High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy

[bradagilah]

Hi,

I am proud to go public, and share the findings of my group. This is a simple example of over-unity ready for America now. The video I am sharing, is crammed full of information you need to know. Also, please visit the link to the overunity and ATS forum, to read the questions I have already answered.

Thanks,
Pierre

Youtube Link:
High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Announcement - YouTube

Overunity.com Thread:
High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy

ATS Thread:
High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy -ATS Thread

[Shadesz]

I smell a rat. No offense.

Show us a working prototype and I will investigate deeper. Watching the video screams of a person who thinks they have it figured out but who wants to let other people actually spend time, energy, and money testing it. Not to mention you demonstrate that you really don't understand electricity.

Prove me wrong, where is the working generator? How many watthours does it use compared to how many it produces? How did you make thsoe measurments?

Until then...


PS, that crash video you uploaded is crazy. Poor person. No-one deserves to die like that. Thanks for sharing. Hopefully it will make some people slow down during storms (both rain and snow). Edit: You seem to exaggerate things. You claim that crash had no survivors however I see it very likely that the big rig driver survived?

[bradagilah]

Read up on the ATS forum, you reply has already been answered multiple times.
High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy, page 1

If what you have to say is not redundant I will gladly reply here.

[Shadesz]

That thread confirms it. No real working prototype. No real understanding of Lenz Law, thermodynamics, and basic conservation physics.

Not to mention I just easily confirmed that the claim you made on your other video is false as well. It appears that the only fatality of that crash was the guy that swerved. The people in the semi, box truck, and car beside the semi survived. Only one reported fatality.


So everyone else, don't waste your time. This guy doesn't do his real homework before making a claim. I'm moving on.

[bradagilah]

That thread confirms it. No real working prototype. No real understanding of Lenz Law, thermodynamics, and basic conservation physics.

Not to mention I just easily confirmed that the claim you made on your other video is false as well. It appears that the only fatality of that crash was the guy that swerved. The people in the semi, box truck, and car beside the semi survived. Only one reported fatality.


So everyone else, don't waste your time. This guy doesn't do his real homework before making a claim. I'm moving on.

You didn't read the ATS read, nor did you read the overunity.com thread. I am welcoming any credible and trusted individuals, to come to my facility in person, and validate the prototypes on behalf of the community.

Instead of researching, a video you have no clue the context off, because you've got an axe to grind, spend that time on the website of major motor manufacturers, including Baldor, Leeson, and AO Smith. Look at the specifications of a premium efficiency four pole AC induction motor such as the Baldor EM3710T, notice the 576 VA per HP breakdown. And then go match that to the specifications of say an Alcir permanent magnet 3PH 24 pole generator head, rated for 6.7 Hp, which supplies 746 VA of electrical energy out, per horsepower mechanical IN. Or, since you seem to be so good at doing your own research, why don't contact Baldor, or Leeson and ask them to quote you on the price for a 24 Pole 3-Phase permanent magnet generator head rated for 5KW, and ask them for all the NEMA name plate specifications. If your willing to do that, your doing the forum members on energeticforum.com a favor.

While your at it, go track the motor specification trends on Baldor's website. Notice how, as the pole count of a motor goes up, its rpm decreases, and its torque increases, and so does its current draw. The inverse holds true with a high pole count generator head, as the pole count goes up, so does the current produced, and the torque required to turn the generator shaft. Toque and current are intimately related quantities with motors. I challenge you to find a circumstance where this doesn't hold true. You are good at doing your research after all? The volt/frequency pattern is also directly correlated with RPM. This fact holds true with DC and AC motors.

What we are doing here is using leverage to achieve overunity, which can't be done mechanically alone, but in the field of electricity it is possible, and the information inside of the text books, and the specifications of every major motor/generator manufacturer corroborate exactly what I am saying.

-------
I made a mistake by not being more careful with my choice of titling in that youtube video, and I never expected it to get that many views, but somehow Joe Roggan got hold of it and tweeted it to everyone. And men like you with a melon up your ass and an axe to grind find a way to turn it into a character flaw. Very well played sir. I'll correct the title, but I was fully aware that the truck driver survived... I am surprised you had, a bit of hesitancy with the full sized eighteen wheeler ramming into an SUV, you actually considered for a second there the possibility of the driver in that eighteen wheeler having not survived? There's a huge difference in mass there, and through instinct alone, let alone hard physics, one would be lead to the deduce that the truck driver would end up alive. But really, I think you knew better from the moment you watched that video, you just wanted to make something out of nothing. Sounds like you are into overunity? Something out of nothing... Isn't that what overunity is supposed to be?


-Pierre

[SkyWatcher]

Hi bradagilah, thanks for sharing the information.
This reminds me of my electric plane that uses a 6 to 1 gear box to turn the propeller, it becomes very efficient in spite of the gear box losses, as long as the correct propeller is used.
Kinds similar to your setup, the correct generator is needed to match the drive motor and ratio.
I would think a small home built device could be made, if people are encouraged enough to verify the claims, I don't think with the state of funny money land, that many are going to spend much time or anything until they see something tangible.
What about rc car dc motors or something like that in that size running a home built multi pole generator.
Does this need to be a certain scale you think to work.
peace love light
tyson

[rogerb]

Hi Bradagilah,

Can you post me a link to the generator specifications and performance curves. I cant seem to find the detail required. A generator will not output a static set of data, but rather as you pointed out there is a dependency on Torque and RPM.

I found the motor spec's:
AC Motors: EM3710T

I am trying to run the numbers on your setup, as a good engineer should do!
This sort of thing defies engineering principles, but nevertheless I will run the numbers.
Roger

[citfta]

Wrong conclusion

I read all the posts at OU and also posted a comment there which I will share here. This guy is mixing up full load current and output power. On OU he claims the output power rating on a 3 phase motor is for each phase and therefore using his calculations you should be able to get overunity. I worked as an industrial maintenance electrician for 30 years. He is wrong about how motors are rated. The rating on a motor is for the total power available at the shaft. He is correct that a 3 phase motor has less current draw on each phase but not about how the horsepower of a motor is rated. If you have any doubts about this just go to any motor manufacturer's site and see how they rate their motors. Wikipedia also says the same thing.

Respectfully,

Carroll

[ewizard]

Guys please read the thread (just 2 pages now) at overunity.com. bradagilah has already made it clear he is not looking for any money on this and just wants to share it with everyone. He has also stated he will do an in person demo with anyone who can make it to any of several locations in the U.S. including Texas and California.

And as far as going by what your college training has taught you or your experience on the job don't we all know by now that the PTB have done all they can to suppress and hide the information we need to make overunity? Do you really trust what is stated on motor ratings? Do we really know through our own testing that it is NOT possible to do what bradagilah is describing here? I say give him a chance to show us before chasing him off. If he is willing to do an in person demo then those who attend will be able to say if this is valid or not. I'll assume a demo will be done in a way to clearly show overunity. Self looping would be the best but if this is only achieving in the area of COP ~ 1.5 it may or may not be possible. But if the right measurement equipment is available I'm sure it can be determined if this is valid overunity.

[one_christian_warrior]

http://free-energy.yolasite.com/

how about energy multiplication
where you have two equal voltage motors
one is DC for input
which has a large pulley attached to it
the second motor is AC
on a much smaller pulley
this way your driver motor only turns a few times
while your output motor spins hundreds of times
you get a multiple of power out
compared to the power you put in
you run your output motor, (or multiple motors)
through a full wave bridge rectifier and voltage regulator
to power your DC input motor
and take AC power straight off your AC generator
You could start this system running by giving the big pulley a little turn

(I had to set my chair to max torq=1st gear and max speed=10th gear)

We could all be putting power back into the system, by building a rough Perpetual Motion mechanisms out of junk yard parts even. I would imagine that the manufacturing industry would quickly come out with these mechanisms in all sizes, so that people could easily supplement their incomes by selling power to the power companies

PLEASE let us act FAST
Let this be a Gift to all mankind
this energy multiplication system works
it does not work on electronics calculations
but works on large speed differences
between your input and your output motors

this major multiplication of rpms is great enough
to negate any loss due to friction losses
because of the vast circumference difference
between your input motor (extremely slow)
and the output motor (extremely fast)

ok, lets just keep talking about how this wont work
never really even trying to build it, (it is too far fetched to believe)
and let this blessing to mankind be missed

http://free-energy.yolasite.com/

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, Hi warrior, I have read your information elsewhere a few times already.
He did say this can be done different ways and it seems you found that the drive motor can be a slower rpm high torque, high number pole motor and that the generator can be a high speed less number pole design, which is opposite to what he suggests, though as you point out, works also.
I seem to recall and have information in my library of garry stanley making tests on this, though I don't think he used a step down or step up mechanical ratio change.
I wonder if this is possible with solid state, the solid state exciter that woopy has shown with one turn step down seems similar, very high input frequency drive coil, stepped down to very low voltage, though what happens to the frequency, I assume it is similar, yet is now at a voltage that can charge back the source.
peace love light
tyson

[one_christian_warrior]

hi folks + SkyWatcher

One multiplication factor is
the circumference difference between
the drive motor (very large)
and the generator motor(s) (smaller the better)

Another multiplication factor
could be the number of AC generators
that you have on this one drive motor + pulley
it could be tens or hundreds of them on a large belt

I wish that I had the dexterity
and the experimental equipment
to be able to see these tests work for myself
(please, report back on any test results)

but remember the circuit simulator software
I should be able to use it to do experiments
And even see the figures on the multiplication factors
If,,, I can ever figure out how to use it..... lol

this is sooo,,,,,,,,, simple

your Bro,
. . . . joe

Hi folks, Hi warrior, I have read your information elsewhere a few times already.
He did say this can be done different ways and it seems you found that the drive motor can be a slower rpm high torque, high number pole motor and that the generator can be a high speed less number pole design, which is opposite to what he suggests, though as you point out, works also.
I seem to recall and have information in my library of garry stanley making tests on this, though I don't think he used a step down or step up mechanical ratio change.
I wonder if this is possible with solid state, the solid state exciter that woopy has shown with one turn step down seems similar, very high input frequency drive coil, stepped down to very low voltage, though what happens to the frequency, I assume it is similar, yet is now at a voltage that can charge back the source.
peace love light

tyson

[stargate22]

?????

If he doesn't get the specs out in public sooooon.....it may be short lived!



....or he may?

[Joit]

one_christian_warrior, what you do discribe is not discovered, because usual the transmission from power is usual a 1:1 Ratio minus losses.
One Question, your chair has a Motor in what charge the Batteries?
I been thinking about your Story too, but i found a hook there. When you charge your Batteries with a second motor, when its in idle or downhill, then it happens with the Power from gravity and the weight with the Chair,
not with the Power from the Batterie alone or with a Flywheel, what drives only the Generator.
Its another Force, what you do need to add, when you want to calculate it, even when you need more Power to drive uphill. Not sure, how this comes out but mostly negative at the transmission factor.
For emailing the Gouvernment, i would not do that, mainly they are not interested, probatly speak with a Person there, what really wanna invest into a Idea, but else it is waste of Time. And even more wasted at higher Offices.

[bradagilah]

Goodness gracious. I am so spread across forums right now, I forgot to check back here. I getting setup for a video, please be patient. And I'll request some performance curve data from a few generator head manufactures who have low RPM designs.

I suggest reading up on EVERY POST IN the ATS thread. It has gotten pretty intense.
High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy, page 1