Tweet
Classic example of TRV data being misinterpreted
The following is a classic illustration of TRV data being misinterpreted by a Client.
Short version-
Many years ago I did a TRV session for an individual that wanted to know what job they would be working at 5 years in the future.
The data I got described a prison. There was data of someone sweeping, looking out the fence, and many other emotions one would feel if they were an inmate and wished they were on the outside.
There was more, but that is the gist.
I gave him the data, still not knowing what the Target Cue was (I was "blind").
He then told me the cue and was all excited because he had been thinking that he wanted to work in a correctional facility. He even said that the description in the data was matching to the facility that he was thinking of working in.
I cautiously voiced that it seemed like the data was referring to an inmate, not someone who worked there and went home every night. He said it was probably just him empathizing with the plight of the inmates.
A few years later I heard that he had been convicted of a crime and was in prison. Just recently I learned that he is in the very facility that he was thinking of working at (the one that had been described in the TRV data).
I was a new TRV'er at the time. Today if the same thing occurred, I would have other work it blind and be more direct with the Client...maybe suggesting to do some work on an optimum alternative to the current trajectory.
WOW!
Short version-
Many years ago I did a TRV session for an individual that wanted to know what job they would be working at 5 years in the future.
The data I got described a prison. There was data of someone sweeping, looking out the fence, and many other emotions one would feel if they were an inmate and wished they were on the outside.
There was more, but that is the gist.
I gave him the data, still not knowing what the Target Cue was (I was "blind").
He then told me the cue and was all excited because he had been thinking that he wanted to work in a correctional facility. He even said that the description in the data was matching to the facility that he was thinking of working in.
I cautiously voiced that it seemed like the data was referring to an inmate, not someone who worked there and went home every night. He said it was probably just him empathizing with the plight of the inmates.
A few years later I heard that he had been convicted of a crime and was in prison. Just recently I learned that he is in the very facility that he was thinking of working at (the one that had been described in the TRV data).
I was a new TRV'er at the time. Today if the same thing occurred, I would have other work it blind and be more direct with the Client...maybe suggesting to do some work on an optimum alternative to the current trajectory.
WOW!
Comment