Ice age 3-D model

[mire]

Ice Age Model years of work went into this. I hope you find it of interest.


2012: External Net Force Torque, Precession - YouTube

This model in its physical form, and character was made with great care to include all know probability in its most simple of form.

The establishment of the most probable of all the inputs i include for this simple model.


A warning this is a very unconventional theory, it only came to light recently, and is related to my special study's.
This will include research I have done in order to make global climate change theory possible to every reader.
I have determined a need to account for the recent flurry of questions about ice ages, and Global warming.
The information I will include will have as many Facts as possible for this very simple Ice age theory.

Background information, define ice age.

A change in climate were the northern pole, southern pole, or both begin to experience a build up of ice sheet, or snow cap for an unidentified period of time.
This can relate to mini Ice age definition as well. The best I can do is relate this to observation.

'The "wiki"- definition An ice age or, more precisely, glacial age, is a generic geological period of long-term reduction in the temperature of the Earth's surface and atmosphere, resulting in the presence or expansion of continental ice sheets, polar ice sheets, and alpine glaciers.'

The wiki definition is also speculative. It considered an ice age as a long term scenario. I simply excluded that premise.

The basics . Q: When we describe a system effected by change, how do you determine, and go about explaining these changes in a scientific manner?
Include, and determine the state of changes occurring in the system leading to a functional physical working model.

My question was used to determine these factors.
The methodology, I had used the axiom assuming all is true. I picked it apart piece by piece, what is left are these observations, and determinable effects.

I had tested for a high degree of accuracy.
All statements used for explaining changes by categorizing the fundamental laws of nature.
Change was determined by cause, and effect including only what is not assumed, but instead what is widely known.
Factor that are less widely known are also included, and gives answers to questions current models lack.

by use of axiom assuming all statements are true, and then by testing it for truth.
by using well known principles, explaining a cause for a given effect.
by keeping it very simple, including self evident or well known principles.
by explaining other less known causes for a given effect.

Try to see this for what I show. I have a carpenters level. It has a bubble of air in the center. The level is used to show what side is up, and what side is down. The air bubble in the center shows equilibrium.
How can I use this in my model that this is so in the case of our planet? How will this predict when a possible ice age will occur?

let earths axis be the level plane, and if I stretched my level from north to south pole the bubble is in perfect equilibrium.. This be the implication, the earth has an up and down.
Obviously Earth is not in perfect equilibrium, when it comes to cold air finding its place among the cold air in our planet system.
We may then state the planet is not in perfect balance, and the bubble resides over the southern pole, rather then the equator. Do you agree?



How will that bubble then in fact shift from equilibrium? Not as hard as you may make it, but by a change in earth axial position. This would cause the bubble to shift.. do you agree?
We have a northern hemisphere, and a southern. If the coldest hemisphere be the southern, than because of Antarctica having a lower temperature then the north pole. This remains true.
Now I wish to cause all the cold air in the south to flow to the north. How can that be? A simple explanation.
A move in axis will prove a shift in bubble, and therefore equilibrium is now in the process of shift, and change. The observable factor, and start of the age. Prediction is important.
I have determined the Northern side now in a process of cold air shift. That shift will eventually find its equilibrium with the coldest air once again above the northern pole.

There are many circumstances that can be related to an ice age, long term, or short term.
One of these circumstances has to do with the earths temperature in relation to the evaporation rate of the oceans world wide.
More evaporation, more water vapor in the atmosphere, and not in the oceans. Predictions that self verify are important.

How can cloud cover effect the globe in relation to temperature rains, snow, oceanic currents, and airflow circulation in the system?
In the same manner volcanic gasses may block out the sun. In the same manner if a deep impact was to occur here on earth, by causing the solar rays to be reflected.
This could lead to a progressive ice age, as time passes world temperatures will fall at a faster rate, more so after the blocking of solar radiation.
Other factors included are also determined, and agree with current knowledge.
Such as gasses from volcanoes. this may block out the suns energy over time. I include the most understood factors, well known today by modern science.
Dust from either volcanoes, meteorite impacts, and the deforestation of the planet. To much air born material in the system.
Perhaps even a dust bowl world wide. leading to a colder climate due to less solar warmth reaching the earths surface.
Solar fluctuations, may lead to a cooling, or warming of earths surface. Both can lead to an ice age. I can agree with that.
Location of equilibrium, or a change in Earth Axial position can lead to a warming, and cooling in one hemisphere over the other.
Non equilibrium. The teeter totter perspective. Similar is the function of a see-saw.

Factors included seem to answer all of the possible circumstances related to ice age periods.

Premiss.

By a change in Axial position, or equilibrium of Earth system in relationship to said galactic plain. I can reflect this change in several ways.

1. By a change in location, and, or position of a body in relation to said plain. A body such as the Earth may experience diverse effects. Including magnetic anomaly, including a change in air flow direction, or temperature within the given system. assuming it has an atmosphere.

2. A change in Earth axis position, to whatever degree may have diverse effects on the inner system, or atmosphere of said body.
This In relation to its present equilibrium, and its magnetic alignments to the stars.. The rotation of the given body, or its angular momentum can make predictable statements. Self verified today.

3. Ice age By volcanic emissions alone, or in conjunction with a change in equilibrium of a system. In relation to its orbit, axial position, and speed of rotation. May also lead to an ice age. Extremely non intuitive.

4 A large meteor impact may lead to an ice age, by the blocking of solar rays reaching the Earths surface.

All statements are true statements.. Yes or no? I have determined this is accurate.
How many of these effects mentioned have taken place today, and when did the first ideas develop?


1. For the axial shift, and bubble, yes there was 2 separate events in the last 2 years. the axis has shifted a total of 7 inches.

2. more then 30 volcanoes have erupted, and continue to erupt in the last 18 months.
fact. If you want to see the numbers of how much dust and ash have been sent hurling into the atmosphere. (quantity of gaseous material).

3. Water vapor level of our atmosphere is quickly increasing. Storms with high wind speed reflect these relations in the given way. A change in angular momentum, and velocity of rotation.
I will also post the numbers. water vapor, or steam is the number one volcanic gas expelled by volcanoes. Include estimated gaseous material over time.

4. There has not been a deep impact on earth by meteorite in a long time. This observation of cause for an ice age today is therefore is excluded from any cause as of today. No deep impact.

I only need to show you with pictures how the air in the system, has made a change in direction in the last 18 months. I show air flow from the southern hemisphere is moving to the northern.
The proper term is arctic, tropical, continental flow. Crossing boundary lines.

5. Solar fluctuation, again this is present in this model. Solar energy is a given, and may decrease, or increase over time.. We now are in the 24 solar cycle, and it has produced heating fluctuation on Earth also.
The sun has also produced many solar flare extremes during this event. 24th solar cycle started in 2010. All info can be found on the net about the problems of solar cycle 24. I can provide much more data. Make your own determinations on these conditions. Solar energy, angular momentum, volcanic eruptions, meteor impact, increase in gaseous materials , and dust in the system, axial shift, Etc..
Oceans reflect the immediate changes, and therefore determined a leveling off period is also is progressive.

All these effects are ongoing, and observable.
The self verified Factor: solar anomalous, volcanic eruption on a large scale, tilt in axial position, Earth magnetic field anomalous, a change in direction of air circulation, and oceanic tides moving to the north.

The model is simple, and works very well for prediction. Excluding all global warming BS mainstream claims.

According to this model are we closing in on an ice age?
Has all causing factors been reflected upon enough to make a determination? If we stick to known causes only. It definitely closely agrees.

Ice age cause, simple verifying model.

See the movies I have made. Immediate determinations based on observation of the globe over time. The first movie was just after the Great chili quake. After the axis has shifted 3 inches.
Pleas pause this movie at 31 seconds, do you see what I do? Intuitive of scientific validating factors. The intimidate change is a constant in determining a cause. There is a massive drip, or a drip of cold air moving toward the equator. Looks like a change in equilibrium in the Earth system. This is the bubble I have reflected. Some may say this is a wobble, some may say indeterminable. Further scientific observation does not agree with the given notion..

[mire]

definition assume respiratory conditions are increasing.

For me, I have noticed the atmosphere is producing copious amounts of ozone, several less well know causes can be accounted for.
Lets face it, the nuclear disaster in japan is a main contributor. Radioactive material drifting around the entire world.

What does radio active mean? It means it is releasing energy.
The interaction in our atmosphere, causes a response.

water vapor in the form of cloud cover gets heated, heat causes it to evaporate quickly, leading to less cloud cover were the heating is very high.
Perhaps the drought in Texas is related to that, the radiation transforms the atmosphere leading to a huge spike in low level ozone, you may not like this answer, but it is scientifically sound.

Other causes an increase in natural gas, and methane bubbling up from pockets under ground that have reached the surface. an earth quake, or drilling in search of fuel may release the trapped pockets of gas.

This gets even more dangerous, as it is also exposed to solar rays, and even the radiation coming from nuclear plants that fail, nuclear testing, under ground testing etc.

This is not per-say the (only factors) to respiratory problems on a global scale, but is becoming evident, a main contributor. Independent study, and sampling of the air you breathe and the drinking water being consumed
Is necessary for determining cause. The amount of tolerances a body can handle is determined not by the individual, but by the quantity a species can safely tolerate.

If the quantity of these very dangerous by products find its way hovering above your home, you can be sure the clean breathable oxygen is reduced. It may even lead to brain damage, or permanent damage to the respiratory system.
researches verify that.



If we go back to 2010, 6,7 or greater quakes are increasing in frequency.

If we go back to 2009 we have a somewhat stable environment.

When dealing with 2010, prediction was very intuitive, and there was found to be a cause.

In 2011, predictions may be determined on a time sensitive base if we look at 2010.

Earthquakes are generally not time sensitive. random quakes are a result of stress on plates that are in motion, assuming the earth is in a stable condition.

In 2011 the earth is quickly becoming destabilized, and an outcome for future predictions based on the time frame given for 2010 will lead to a higher degree of accuracy.

The progression of the destabilizing crustal shifts for 2011 will clearly show an increase of frequency, and more powerful quakes, leading to the next great earthquake expected within the next 4 months. closer to the end of march is my prediction, although it may be sooner December 2011 to February 2012.

January 2011 will have a high probability for 7.0 to 8.0 earthquakes.

If you had thought earthquake prediction is unlikely, then by looking at a graph of 2010, you may prove with accuracy time sensitive relations for 2011, and also 2012.

People claiming to be able to use astronomical charts in the past found it most difficult.

Volcanic eruptions are no different for 2011, and 2012 many will be erupting by mid January, and continue for a few months there after. You may find a chart for 2010, and determine these eruptions most accurately for the next 2 to 3 years. It is time to be prepared.

The progression will accelerate more so after destabilization. So yea, its not looking good.

I hope your concern may lead to a better understanding of the process of torque induced precession.

It has been found to be a progression of axial shift. Over a 3 to 5 year period starting in early months of 2010.

The magician does not tell his secrets, but in this case science does. I am a scientist, not a magician.

Get technical, and yes science does, you must provide data within the parameters, or scope determined to be highly unlikely to occur.

The greater the magnitude of prediction, the less likely it is to occur. Stated you must go back to a somewhat stable platform 2009. When dealing with averages, the greater the imputable input factors, the greater the average relation over time. We don't average here.This is clearly time sensitive.

I have set the bar much higher. you must go back to the year 2008-2009 and make your input data entirely.

Do the same for the entire year of 2010 to the current date. Compare, see if a time sensitive progression has occurred as of Feb 27, 2010.

Then you must determine how an earthquake is related as a time sensitive factor, comparing the 4 years of total data.

To be on the safe side, 2 years before progression, 2 years of progression. Now you plot on two charts, each with 2 years of average data, and compare. The chart will tell the story all by itself. the chart must follow the time sensitive information provided. Meaning each month, and each quake plotted on the chart 6.0 or greater corresponds, or in relation with the date it had occurred.

By doing so, the data will reflect to a much higher degree of accuracy.



"Terminology of definitions, context : wiki

"In traditional logic, an axiom or postulate is a proposition that is not proven or demonstrated but considered either to be self-evident or to define and delimit the realm of analysis. In other words, an axiom is a logical statement that is assumed to be true. Therefore, its truth is taken for granted, and serves as a starting point for deducing and inferring other (theory dependent) truths.
basic, foundational proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition, or assumption.
to be the cause of; bring about. A person, or thing that acts, happens, or exists in such a way that some specific thing happens as a result; the producer of an effect:
"

Science has been looking for evidence that explain what chain of events, or factors play a major role in predicting cataclysmic events in the past, present, and future.
Making past assumptions leads to debate, a major problem for modern theoretical advancements, and the difficulty researchers have addressing these issues.

My goal : By taking certain considerations, and factors into account paving the way for new viable study dealing with past, present, and future crisis of the environment. With the flurry of data entering the debate, certain real factors may have been ignored, or misunderstood in recent years, leading to false, or misleading outcomes. The reader is stuck in the middle of this debate, asking more questions than having answers provided.

In light of the moon, Bruce Lee said, "don't focus on the finger, or you will miss all that heavenly glory." he also said when he strikes a target that "It strikes all by itself"

I have chosen the date Jan 29, 2010 to begin this study. Why? Because it was then certain information had come to light relating to the events that follow. I bring your attention to the first wolf moon in 20 years. smiling at Bruce. The event may have not been all that memorable to the reader, but it was for me. What occurred shortly thereafter was something incredible indeed. After turning my attention away from the moon I observed the sun in its relation out of curiosity for the event. I had discovered the sun was in a process of change, that change was the beginning of a new solar cycle. (solar cycle 24) A process that will be the most memorable event for the rest of my life. After I had observed this process for the next 5 to 7 days I had confirmed that a new solar cycle had begun. shortly after it was also confirmed by leading scientists of the day.

The next observation lead me to focus on the effects this change could have on the planet earth, and that is just what i did. I now had 3 factors to keep a close eye on. Each new factor was leading to other factors with a higher, and higher degree of probable outcomes. (cause, and effect chain.)

1. The sun. solar rotational periods. In comparison, determinable factors help predict earth quake, and eruptions.
2. The moon. lunar periods of change. Time frame relations observable factors.
3. The planet earth, and all the effects relate to these changes. Predicted out comes.

The first real results came as a series of powerful earthquakes. Unaware at the time of the historical implications of the Jan 17, 2010 Haiti earthquake,
occurring just prior to the start of solar cycle 24. I had considered all may have been by coincidence, and my attention was now on the The Vernal Equinox. A time when the Sun reaches the balancing point in its path through the tropical zodiac, when the length of the day is equal to the length of the night.
Astronomy charts confirm, leading to the beginning of the new astrological year. (The new age also, 25000 years perhaps) The dawning of the age of Aquarius.
It was my belief at the time Feb 16, 2010 marked Equinox, sweet 16. I also confirmed it had occurred in a specific location on the planet looking at astronomical charts.

[mire]

[mire]

Ice age 3 d -model described. Yes Doctor? The precession is continuity torquing. It continues to follow the slipping top analogy.
Its simply spinning. Its simply stunning, its simply continues to rotate I will exaggerate your observations. Its simply up to you to observe.

As it rotates earthquakes become time variable according to rotational speed. The axis it i pointing, it following the spinning top.. its simply slipping. its simply a stunning effect. There is a pressure of fluid within the core. Its simply splitting, its Humphrey Dummpie. Its described ,and self verifying. Its simply continues.
Its bursting, of a water balloon. Its simply to soon., Its simply predictable. Its following its secondary oscillation. Beating like a drum. The wave is in front. Its simply like a pointy boat or arrow. Its simply caused by this star. There is, simply no way around. The time frame was predictable. Its simply solar rotation. Its simply lunar precession. @3 days of solar rotation, and according to speed it will split like a cord. Ripping the seams. Its
It was simply well known. Its simply a des-cry. An utter dis-( By grace). I am simply sorry. It simply was well known to be true. lighting up like a tree on Christ mass day. Its spilling on two sides. The start of the predictable out come is time variable. It also follow along the net force inducing. Its also bouncing and skipping along. simply bending space. What is relativity?

Its simply, Cause and effect.. Angel

As the earth spheroid preforms like an egg.

[mire]

Observe with care.

2012 net force precession. Rainbow in the sky. - YouTube

I will add a final summery as time permits..

Thanks all, and cheers.

[mire]

The page looks great and is already time really informative...i read out your interesting and informative post....Thanks for sharing this informative post....

Thanks for the reply.

I managed to make short summery of cause and effects..

Summery conclusions.

Ice age cause, simple verifying model. Immediate determinations based on observation of the globe over time. After the axis has shifted 3 inches.
Feb 27-2010, and again 4 more on march 11-2011 scientific validating factors. The immediate change is used as a main determining factor, or the cause for immediate changes in weather, volcanic activity, and earthquake relations over the last 2 to 3 years.

subduction zones due to torque. clearly the earths magnetic field is attracted to the secondary systems magnetic field interaction with all the planets in our solar system. Earth Has experienced increases, and decreases of rotation speed.

The secondary system will reach its closes point, and a great Quake is therefore predicted, expected. Possibly by March 23 2012.
Earths orbit crosses the horizontal plain according to the position, and alignments of charges, or the magnetic field lines of that secondary system in relation to local space, and earths current position of yearly orbit.. We must be closing in very quickly now. Today is feb 15 2012.

The influence of net charge, and the determined lens effect, or Red shift cassimire effect influences Earths reaction to inductive forces causing eruptions.
April to may we should see this increase in activity once again, according to time sensitive data over the last 2 to 3 years.
Volcanic eruption time variable is predictable, confirming the increase of volcanic eruption expected for the month of January through march 2012. Not excluding April, and May 2012.

The 3-D model has Pictures of ongoing storms earthquakes, and other given effects determined to be a direct relation to the increasing energy inductive forces.

everything needed to make accurate prediction , calculate net charge, Observe gravitational lensing, or poynitng energy was included. A self generated system of mass. The inductive charge and movement through local space.
Increasing pressure, Velocity, and changes of direction of Earths inner fluid.
gaseous material releasing vast quantity of dangerous materials for all life.

The Precession can now be solved as caused by an external torque, rather than caused by lunar or solar cycles alone. Verifiable reactions according to Einstein are confirmed. Astronomers such as Galileo Galilee

See Maxwell poem of continuum mechanics.

Thank God, and God blessing to All. Peace.

[mire]