Coherent displacement vs Dissipative transference

[insyfix]

I've been looking at some of the technical cores in Eric Dollard's papers and Adrian Marsh's theory of displacement and transference. Here's what I've observed so far:

So basically, the core distinction here is the two types of electricity, as both authors agree that standard EM theory describes only half of the equation. There is another unspoken type of electricity which these and many more people which are often discussed in this forum extensively explore.

For Dollard, modernistic electro-magnetic radio theory considers space to be empty and distorted. In contrast, wireless theory (which he determines Tesla's actual machines were built off of) considers space to be filled with an all-permeating ether.

Essentially, it's this:

electromagnetic = transverse, lossy, light-speed (and this is what mainstream scientists consider the only type of electricity because it doesn't exceed the speed of light, so it obeys relativity)

magneto-dielectric = longitudinal, self-powering, faster than light (and this is what is rejected and or never talked about because of the last point, as it proves relativity wrong)

Marsh on the other hand in his theory defines the two core terms, "Transference" and "Displacement" like this:

Transference:

In very short summary, transference refers to the electrical phenomenon that results from the linear inter-action of the electric and magnetic fields of induction, at best, spatially out of phase and temporally in phase, but overall an incoherent phenomenon.

Displacement:

In summary, for this introduction on the concepts of displacement and transference, displacement is a coherent phenomenon and mechanism where the electric and magnetic fields of induction are in phase spatially and temporally, and are effectively unified to one overall induction field.

and another alternative definition:

Accordingly displacement is a phenomenon where the electric and magnetic fields of induction cannot be distinguished from the other electrically, they are essentially undifferentiated, both are acting in the system and acting together as one induced field.

So:

Displacement = magneto-dielectric coherence

Transference = electromagnetic dissipation

So, what makes displacement different? Marsh says it's different because it occurs when fields are "in phase both spatially and temporally," meanwhile transference has them "spatially out of phase and temporally in phase."

Dollard agrees: His magento-dielectric wave has unified magnetic and dielectric fields. And this unified field does not "travel" normally, because its state changes simultaneously everywhere within the system.

The implication here is that what standard meters do is that they measure incoherent fields, because a coherent, unified induction produces no net voltage difference. Basically, you cannot see displacement with an oscilloscope.

Now, there is a reason why we don't normally see it, and there is also a way how we can.

Marsh explains transference dominates steady state:

Only when the need established dynamically in the circuit cannot be met (balanced) through transference, is the mechanism of displacement directly observable.

This happens during non-linear events, such as switching surges, spark gaps and dielectric breakdown. Dollard's spark gap acts as an engine for this, because the sudden collapse creates a broadband longitudinal impulse, which is a pure displacement event.

Marsh provides an example: switching a high-voltage DC dynamo onto a long line. For a moment or two, transference can't keep up. Displacement acts directly, visible as "orthogonal, filament-like streamers."

The gateway to etheric engineering seems to be abrupt changes in the dielectric field. Smooth, linear AC notably never accesses this regime.

Alright, here's another claim which matters, practically speaking. Dollard claims that a properly adjusted magneto-dielectric system presents a reactance to the power company.

In electric wireless systems there exists a reciprocal relation between the energy of the antenna network in contact with the space and the utility that supplies power to the wireless transformers. Thus the reactance of the antenna network appears as a reactance to the power company, if the wireless system is so adjusted. Therefore, it is theoretically possible for the wireless system to become a supply of electrical energy to the power company without burning fuel.

And for Marsh, displacement leads to:

regeneration of the electrical system when source and load are correctly connected and the purpose or “need” of the circuit is established and maintained in a state of dynamic equilibrium.

and:

injection of additional energy required to initiate the re-balance (speed-up) the process of transference.

So, this is coupling to a previously ignored reservoir (the ether's distributed energy), where the source triggers an exchange, but the energy comes from the ether.

A crucial experiment that demonstrates this, is the single-wire line.

According to Dollard, his ground radio used the earth as one conductor, and a single elevated wire as the other, effectively being a single-wire magneto-dielectric waveguide.

Marsh's VNA measurements of a Tesla coil driving a single wire (TMT system) show dual resonances: a series mode (transference, energy passes through) and a parallel mode (displacement, energy stored but not transmitted). The parallel mode requires an extra capacitance representing dielectric field coupling across windings.

This leads me to conjecture that the parallel resonant mode in the transmission gain is influenced by the extension of the dielectric induction field from the primary to the secondary, or a capacitive coupling across the turns of the primary and the secondary coil together. If this were the case it would give a more complete view to the transference of electric power across an entire TMT system, and thus far explored in the research currently presented on my website.

Here C2 has been removed, all other aspects of the equivalent circuit remain the same. This illustrates the effect on the transfer gain by removing the element for the distributed inter-turn capacitance, or that which is conjectured to form the parallel resonant mode, and which has most contribution to the formation of the LMD mode within the cavity of the secondary coil. The results show that the parallel mode is no-longer present, and this element is required to form the parallel mode characteristics in the coil. This suggests that the dielectric induction field is no-longer coupled across the windings of the coil, including across the windings from the primary coil to the secondary coil. The series mode resonance is not affected by this change showing how the parallel and series resonant modes, whilst stemming from the same coil geometry, have a relative degree of independence in the results, something that has also been noted in the experimental tuning and matching of the TEM and LMD modes for high-efficiency transference of electric power.

OK, since displacement is meter-invisible, how do we know it exists? Marsh lists observable effects on form:

• Light from a bulb without radiated heat
• Orthogonal streamers in an electric discharge
• Charging of capacitors from "radiated" energy
• "Compression of oil in a tube"

Dollard adds: tree-like Lichtenberg figures burned into wood, and galactic formations inside vacuum bulbs.

Whether you accept the "creating matter" claim or not, it seems that the patterns are at least reproducible. Coherent displacement organizes matter.

Ok, some questions for the forum.

1. Has anyone here observed Marsh's "parallel resonance" transmission on a VNA? What was your coil geometry?
2. Is the "displacement is meter-invisible" claim testable with custom detectors like electroscopes?
3. Marsh's TMT system claims >99% mid-field efficiency. Anyone replicated?

[waltyc]

I can't answer any of your three questions, but I've been playing around with spark gaps, and don smith style coils. I've had the little orange neon bulbs do some weird plasma looking internal breakdown where they flash blues and purples. I can't find anything online, and its hard to pickup with the camera as the orange outshines it and it happens really fast. Not really a galactic formation but it's so small so I don't know. Probably nothing.