Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Something New on 9/11

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Something New on 9/11

    Hi Everyone,

    This is something new found on what happened on 9/11 that I think everyone should see: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis-May1, 2009 | 911Blogger.com This was on May 1, 2009.

    I concider myself to be a man of science and now I have new questions. I would like to know who where the companies that where installing new so-called internet systems throughout the buildings just proir to the event? And I would also like to know who had access to the building elevator systems?

    Come up with some more information you would like to know about what really happend on that day.


    h2opower.

  • #2
    Marvin Bush | Securacom

    George Bush's brother Marvin Bush is one of the main people that owns the security company in charge of the entire WTC complex. They are the ones with access to everything.

    Marvin P. Bush - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Stratesec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #3
      9/11939

      Gleiwitz incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      The Gleiwitz incident, sometimes incorrectly referred to as Operation Canned Goods, was a staged attack on 31 August 1939 against the German radio station Sender Gleiwitz in Gleiwitz, Upper Silesia, Germany (since 1945: Gliwice, Poland) on the eve of World War II in Europe.

      On the night of August 31, 1939 a small group of German operatives, dressed in Polish uniforms and led by Naujocks[2] seized the Gleiwitz station and broadcast a short anti-German message in Polish (sources vary on the content on the message). The Germans' goal was to make the attack and the broadcast look like the work of anti-German Polish saboteurs

      Honiok was dressed to look like a saboteur; then killed by lethal injection, given gunshot wounds, and left dead at the scene, so that he appeared to have been killed while attacking the station. His corpse was subsequently presented as proof of the attack to the police and press.[4]

      In addition to Honiok, several other convicts from the Dachau concentration camp[2] were kept available for this purpose.[3] The Germans referred to them by the code phrase "Konserve" ("canned goods").
      Al

      Comment


      • #4
        There are numerous inconsistency's in the "official" story about what happen on 911. But the finding of thermite in the dust is a real smoking gun that is hard to ignore. Yet the MSM has done a pretty good job of doing just that.

        Other then the obvious what possible explanation is there for the presence of this thermite? And a weapon grade nano-particle sized one at that.

        Comment


        • #5
          YouTube - General of US Intelligence says No Plane Hit The Pentagon!!!


          On other videos on Youtube, You can watch and listen to ground zero just after the planes hit. You will see firefighters running telling everyone to clear the buildings because "bombs are exploding".....and you can hear them.

          There is no excuse for the explosions, they were happening on ground level. Witnesses have said the lobby was "blown up" by the time they got down there when they were escaping....Impossible for the planes to have caused that.

          Comment


          • #6
            So, if the plane did not hit the Pentagon, what happened to the plane and the people on it? I happen to personally know someone who was on that plane and headed to San Fran for a business trip.
            Namaste,
            Pamela
            Discover the Single Greatest Health Science Breakthrough of the Century

            Comment


            • #7
              I wish i knew the full truth, pamela

              Unfortunatly the pentagon has less security on it than my garage... As the only video we are allowed to see is of a time delay traffic stop. Either that Or the footage of the plane will breach national security. Which one could possibly be true?

              Comment


              • #8
                Someone postet somewhere else, that an Airplaine with 6 Blasters did crash few Months after 9/11 at the Atlantic...
                I wont say, that this Flight from the Day did crash somewhere else.
                Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just found this link from Youtube

                  Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                  Proof of the governments real agenda. It took more than one person to assemble an "Operation" of such magnitude, this is the mindset these people in power have. It is every bit as real today as it was in 1962!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    where are the people?

                    Originally posted by Pamela Vicik-Smith View Post
                    So, if the plane did not hit the Pentagon, what happened to the plane and the people on it? I happen to personally know someone who was on that plane and headed to San Fran for a business trip.
                    Not sure about that flight, but the morning of 9/11, Flight 93 (that supposedly hit in Penn) was announced to be landing at the airport at Cleveland and is reported to have bombs on board. It landed, was taxied to one end of the runway, everyone got off. (Where did they go and what happened to them?)

                    In the SAME report, they announced that there were "deeply concerned" about Flight 175 (supposedly hit south tower at WTC) also in the same area.

                    Kind of interesting that this was announced and suddenly it disappeared from the news and remained on the news website and in the archives was online as far back as 2001 when it was released that morning. Not only has the archives been deleted from 2001 showing this but later, they were ordered to delete the story for being "factually incorrect."

                    What are the odds that they would have put up a story about these two planes with those exact 2 flight numbers before those exact two flight numbers are involved in the 9/11 tragedy.

                    Here is one archive or the story: WCPO.com - The Web site of WCPO-TV in Cincinnati, Ohio

                    Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
                    Reported by: 9News Staff
                    Web produced by: Liz Foreman
                    9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
                    A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
                    White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
                    United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.
                    United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.
                    On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.
                    "United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.
                    Sincerely,
                    Aaron Murakami

                    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      wow

                      Thanks for the link and info Aaron

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Pamela Vicik-Smith View Post
                        So, if the plane did not hit the Pentagon, what happened to the plane and the people on it? I happen to personally know someone who was on that plane and headed to San Fran for a business trip.
                        Thatís a very good question and we really donít know the answer. But I seriously doubt that they were on whatever hit the Pentagon.

                        That was a twin engine plane with the engines out on the wings. If that plane hit the Pentagon would we not expect to see two holes punched building rather then just one? These are big heavy engines yet we are to believe that they just suddenly stopped when they hit the building and yet the fragile body of the plane manages to punch in a hole then the wings fold back and they and the engines are sucked into that hole.

                        Then the entire plane is virtually consumed by the fire but we are told that we know who was on the plane because their finger prints were recovered.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yes the Pentagon hit is the second-most absurd "conspiracy theory' put out by the government about 9/11 ... The first and most ridiculous tin-foil-hat garbage being of course the "Bldg 7" lies, imo.

                          They messed up: The early photos show a too-small hole in the building that could not have been made by the Boeing's fuselage, let alone with the two huge Titanium engines.

                          They later brought over a crane and knocked a much bigger hole there.. But that was done too late, the early photos showing the small hole exist. There is positive proof of the crane enlarging the hole, with news footage of it.

                          Oddly enough, that was the ONLY side of the Pentagon to have been recently strengthened to resist bombs: The window had been replaced by ballistic plastics, and the structure greatly strengthened... But only on that one of five sides. The plane had to do a very difficult high-speed descending 180 deg. turn to get to that side too, coming in finally level at an amazing 2 foot off the ground.... You would think it would have been a lot easier for an inexperienced pilot to just go straight in.

                          Several airline pilots with over 20 years' experience, have said they could never have made that extremely difficult maneuver themselves (the plane was supposed to be doing around 500 Knots at the time). This done by a "pilot" who flunked his Cessna training.

                          PilotsFor911Truth.org

                          There were approx. 14 cameras that could have shown the event (including some from a nearby hotel and gas station): The FBI confiscated all the tapes, and we were never allowed to see any of them except for that very odd one they released of the parking lot, which is certainly not convincing either way anyway.

                          If there is no legitimate question here and they are "innocent"... WHY NOT BRING OUT THE OTHER CAMERA FOOTAGE?

                          ...And then there is of course Dick Cheney's famous angry reply... The "HAVE YOU HEARD ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY!?" statement.

                          This was reported by U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta.. Lol rather hard to refute.

                          Notice how Sen. Lee Hamilton changes the subject immediately when he realizes where this is going

                          YouTube - 911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            9/11 questions

                            There was a turbine that was like a few feet diameter or something. Anyway, those are way too small for the plane that was claimed to hit.

                            An eye witness said he saw that is looked like a "cruise missile with wings." It was painted to look like an American Airlines plane. But it is much smaller.

                            The dimensions of the wheel and jet turbine and visual eye witness report matches a Global Hawk cruise missile.



                            Here is a pic of the size of an engine of the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon - these guys could craw inside that thing.



                            Here is part of the jet turbine from an actual photo taken of the Pentagon wreckage - the diameter is smaller than the length of the man's leg.



                            EYE WITNESS testimony on CNN's archive:
                            CNN.com - Up to 800 possibly dead at Pentagon - September 12, 2001

                            Audio of this:
                            YouTube - USA Today reporter speaks

                            "It was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told CNN. "Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards."

                            Eye witness testimony corroborates with the size of the debris matching the Global Hawk as the most likely contender.

                            Hotel footage of Pentagon explosion but no plane. Global hawk flying a few feet above the ground would be too small to be seen. A commercial airliner would have been too big to miss.
                            YouTube - Rare Pentagon 9-11 Surveillance Camera Video of Impact

                            Rumsfield admitting by slip of tongue plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was SHOT DOWN.
                            YouTube - Rumsfeld 's Accidental Slip of the Tongue, Flight 93 shot down!
                            Sincerely,
                            Aaron Murakami

                            Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                            Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                            RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The Exploding Floors of 9-11

                              This newly released footage of the demolitions of WTC 7 and WTC 1 (North Tower) is very significant. There are several important aspects of the demolitions of 9-11 that are proven by these videos. The first is the incredible amount of pulverization of the concrete in WTC 7, which can be seen in the billowing pyroclastic clouds of dust rolling down the streets during its unexplained collapse at 5:25 p.m. on 9-11. Pyroclastic clouds are usually associated with volcanoes and are composed chiefly of rock fragments of explosive origin.
                              Christopher Bollyn
                              see also:
                              Missing Links
                              Al

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X