about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[bistander]

Recent publication

Here is a recent paper authored by Markoul. It is referenced in the delete discussion at Wikipedia.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885318311090

Title:

Research articles
The quantum field of a magnet shown by a nanomagnetic ferrolens
Authors EmmanouilMarkoulakisAntoniosKonstantarasEmmanuelAn tonidakis

[Markoul]

Interesting.

I'd like to hear from Markoul about the Wikipedia deletion.

bi

{Edit}



From: https://en.everybodywiki.com/Ferrolens
Not quite like the Wikipedia.

Hi Guys,

Yeah, sadly, they deleted the Wikipedia ferrolens entry which was already up for three months now as a regular WP article.

The page was attacked by third-party COI roaming WP pages. Wikipedia is a dirty place and much is going on there.

I could ask for help from this forum here to vote in this delete discussion parody but since nobody seemed to be here the last period I didn't bother.

I am glad however that the ferrolens page is now on everybodywiki.

BTW, where have you been all this time?...took a vacation?

EM

[Selfsimilarity]

Im always here Markhoul
Its just that I didnt know what to add to your posts.
Im working on an update on my webpage, but man,
formulating it in a way everbody can follow is really not such an easy task to achieve. As it is going into the theory of everything, I can start in any corner of history, science, magnetism, electricity, but Im not sure yet, which logic is best applied so everybody will get it.
For some, esotherics is best start, for others particles like electron/photon, for others fields, for others space/time volume.

Its so hard, but I will try it anyways <3

[Markoul]

Im always here Markhoul
Its just that I didnt know what to add to your posts.
Im working on an update on my webpage, but man,
formulating it in a way everbody can follow is really not such an easy task to achieve. As it is going into the theory of everything, I can start in any corner of history, science, magnetism, electricity, but Im not sure yet, which logic is best applied so everybody will get it.
For some, esotherics is best start, for others particles like electron/photon, for others fields, for others space/time volume.

Its so hard, but I will try it anyways <3

Right. What about for starters, writing the old story about science producing technology which in turn misleads science?

...what I mean by that I have strong indications that the established totay magnetic sensors used for mapping and vissualization of magnetic fields including Hall effect sensors and even squid sensors due their high ferromagnetic anisotropy property are responsible (in addition to the classical iron filings Faraday experiment) for distorting the actual field of an magnet and giving us an interference pattern of the field instead. Which is of course is an artificially induced pattern and fake geometry of the actual field....

Thus only a non ferromagnetic and more isotropic superparamgnetic quantum magneto optic method like the ferrocell can give the actual undisturbed image of the field of a magnet. That what I call, The Quantum Field of Magnet.

cheers,

EM


What about that he?

[Markoul]

Brian Kerr has moved his video channel here...

https://tinyurl.com/y7fyrnyy
If you like his ferrocell videos you can find him in the above link.

He left youtube for personal reasons explained here:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVpFwdAnW4g[/VIDEO]

[Selfsimilarity]

Thanks for the inputs Markoul, I did some content rearrangement and extention. Its cool like this from the buildup. Like it alot. Also went after Timm's suggestions to first hit them with as many ferrocell images as possible to digest Then start explaining. Have a look and let me know what you think What really is Magnetism – Some Thoughts – An Analysis investigating Magnetism Energy Dynamics via Ferrocell (Light) & CRT (Electrons) & Matter (Iron filings). Click on the picture below to see my powerpoint presentation

[Markoul]

It's like encyclopedia Britannica but specific for Ferrocell

Excellent.

I specially liked the correlation you do of magnetism with Dark Matter and Dark Energy... you know... magnetism is with one foot standing on the dark side...If you know what I mean

As a tip maybe you should do some grouping and categorization of your links and info on your site.

EM

[Markoul]

Ferrolens suggests magnets are possible Quantum Harmonic Oscillators

Quantum field θ pattern of magnet observed with the ferrolens points that a magnet is a quantum harmonic oscillator?



If we assume that the flux pattern above observed with the ferrolens is correct and since magnets are considered to belong and best described by quantum mechanics thus must be quantum machines and also accept the characteristic of magnetic potential of magnetic fields then in the quantum system which is called a magnet, must exist a magnetic potential energy ground state:

see Fig.1 and Fig.2 below





reference: http://www.umich.edu/~chem461/QMChap5.pdf

What are your thoughts about it?

EM

[Selfsimilarity]

I fully agree on quantum oscillator Bochwall is the decharged zeropoint, becoming 2D dielectric potential, magnetically holographically projected into macroscopic magnetic 3D. Macroscopic is all about Fibonacci and golden ratio. These rules/ratio are very important for music too. Fits the quantum oscillation perspective

Guys, we need more exposure! Noone knows the ferrocell. Not enough people listening. I get 4 visitors per day on the webpage. In comparison to world population, we have a problem ;D Any idea how we could achieve that?

[Markoul]

**** them... there are not worthy!

Using the new field geometry shown by the ferrocell

I am now in the process to produce the first monopolar magnet array.

I already have produced successfully three prototypes in my lab.

Publication will come next year.

This will draw their attention anyway.

EM

[Selfsimilarity]

Ferrocell pattern analysis



Guys, when I compare the image from ferrocell to what we know about electric and magnetic fields, it look like neither of them. Its the point inverse mirror image of electric fields aswell as of magnetic fields. Like "anti"-electromagnetic fields. Could this be right? What you guys think?

[Markoul]

SSML,

First, great image presentation above! i LOVE IT!


Your observation is correct and known for many long time now.

This difference is due the false classical model of dipoe magnetic field geometry established in science observed by the macroscopic view of magnetic fields using ferromagnetic sensors and measuring devices.

Since Electric fields and Magnetic fields force vectors presented as fact by mainstream science have as said a 90° polarization angle differential, it would be a perfectly logical conclusion to expect this difference to appear also in their dipole interaction flux patterns.

The quantum magneto optic device ferrocell makes this possible showing us the actual so called Quantim Field of the Magnet.

It is natural when the oposite poles (N-S) of two magnets coming close, the flux lines of one magnet to try to run in parallel with the flux lines of the other. The field lines of one magnet try to encopass the lines of the other and eventually the two poles will join to form the dielectric or else Bloch domain wall field in the middle. This is directly a result of the vortex-torus geometry of the polar fields of a magnet as shown by the ferrocell.

The same behaviour is aslo shown and demonstrated on two merging opposite counter rotational water swirls:



If they are brought close enough the two swirls or whirlpools will merge to one.

This video bellow accidently demonstrates at best opposite poles dipole magnetic interaction (magnetic attraction bond):

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8[/VIDEO]

and this one here:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSqZmLh53Ic[/VIDEO]

merging whirlpools (i.e. a dipole magnet):

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwJTsJdWeek[/VIDEO]

When now the two whirlpools are spinning at the same direction the wave fronts (flux lines) are hitting each other resulting to repulsion.




EM

[Markoul]

Magnetic attraction and repulsion explained as fluid vortex dynamics

Magnetic atraction and repulsion expalained as fluid vortex dynamics (merging and repulsing vortices , whirlpools)






EM

[bistander]

Opinion

Guys, when I compare the image from ferrocell to what we know about electric and magnetic fields, it look like neither of them. Its the point inverse mirror image of electric fields aswell as of magnetic fields. Like "anti"-electromagnetic fields. Could this be right? What you guys think?

Hi Self,

I agree with the premise. Unsure about "anti"-electromagnetic fields. But that is better than magnetic vortex and Bloch nonsense. I do know that the image on the ferrocell is not representing the magnetic flux field directly. The ferrocell image is certainly influenced by the magnetic field like the whirlpool is influenced by the gravitational field. The gravitational field is not the shape of the whirlpool, is it?

Regards,

bi

[Selfsimilarity]

Hi Bi,

I think what the ferrocell is hinting to is the point-symmetry aspect.
It adds a new attribute to electric and magnetic fields as sine and cosine waves. They can be pulsed. Electric and magnetic fields in our space, contracting to zeropoint and inversing on the other side (ferrocell point-mirrored image of electric AND magnetic fields with inversed polarity). I think this pulse oscillation is nature's standing wave (standing waves are permanent, as in "permanent" magnetism), and it spins, while it pulses.