about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[Markoul]

There is no "BLOCH WALL"

there is no "BLOCK REGION"


All these are denotative of a CARTESIAN LOCUS

If there was something there, you could cut a magnet in half and have a NORTH pole half and SOUTH pole half


Nobody can understand magnetism without understanding the ancient Greek principle of Icommensurability OR knowing the REAL definition of POLARITY



You CANT GET THERE from here gerlfriend.

incommensurable
μη δυνάμενος να μετρηθή (not possible to be measured)

...or you can say in that case indivisible.

And of course there is always the so called Bloch region or else middle ground state where pressure mediation between light matter electric charge and dark(unknown) matter magnetic charge balance out and are in equilibrium. In a static field (not EM wave) E is -180° opposite to B. There are trying to cancel each other and constantly press against each other.


How many times you break a magnet there will be always a Bloch region created where this pressures balance. Always finding the sweat spot. You can see that when you attach a steel plate on one of the pole of a magnet. The Bloch wall will shift.


That is my take on the Bloch wall and is very hard someone to convince me otherwise...

EM

[TheoriaApophasis]

incommensurable
μη δυνάμενος να μετρηθή (not possible to be measured)

thats not the definition of incommensurability, thats what can be said OF what is incommensurable, but not what it IS.


the AORISTOS DYAS is incommensurable, A+ Horizmos, or "Without a (line) Horizon", meaning it has no PLACE (topos) to find it like a line on the Horizon, you cant point to it, cause it has no PLACE / Location.

To try to point to a (place/location/ Cartesian) value like the "bloch wall" is as useless as pointing to HOPE or LOVE

There is nothing located "there"

[Markoul]

Peace out Girl Scout


Dare anyone to solve THIS IMAGE

https://ibb.co/hGq58J

HOW the HELL is it possible to have the SAME IMAGE on left and right????

cause on the right, in the center of the ring magnet, there IS NOTHING THERE



Soooooo HOW does 'NOTHING' have the SAME image as the side/"pole" of any other normal magnet.

Yep! I second that...nothing there...the pressure whirl is generating a void at the center and this is true for every magnet pole of a magnet independent its physical shape.

Aslo all magnetic dipole fields have the same geometry independent of shape of magnet or strength.

[Markoul]

There is nothing located "there"

Ahh! ΑΟΡΙΣΤΟΣ = vague, indefinite ... now I get what you mean.


Of course there is nothing there it is 0 zero electric charge pressure differential there E=0. It is the equilibrium line.

If a magnet could be represented by numbers. Bloch domain wall would be always the zero. There is always the zero line on a magnet, thus however many time I spit physically a magnet there will be always a zero. I call the zero the Bloch wall If you don't mind

With that said generation of energy comes always from zero. At the zero ground level electric charge there is no electric energy of light matter to hold off the door shut. And all the hell breaks loose.

The gate to dark matter (aether?) domain opens and dark matter magnetic charge gets ejected into light matter in the form of two hyperboloid counterspace opposite jets of magnetic energy, thus dipole magnetism.

This implies to all matter magnetic or not.

The crux of my EM - Light&Dark matter theory

Therefore because in any two points in the universe from the macroscale down to the quantum level, the electric charge is unbalanced and therefore there is always an Electric field produced, and there is always also a midpoint (domain wall) between them, where E=0, this is the exact spatial string where magnetism emanates out of the dark matter domain as a unknown yet magnetic charge particle or its quanta...is it the superluminal neutrino?...I don't know.

Important here to note is because magnetism is ejected out of the midpoint (domain wall) as monopole dark matter radiation of any spatial electric field between two electric charged points is space therefore because this dipole nature of electric fields the monopole megnetism is ejected in two distinct jets each towards each electric charge of the electric dipolar field, thus magnetism experienced in ordinary matter is always dipole in nature.

This is a beautiful theory because it binds electromagnetism with dark matter domain proving that what we call electromagnetism (including unified strong and weak force) is an effect caused by the interaction of ordinary monopole electric charged matter with dark monopole magnetic charged matter everywhere in the universe and in any scale.

Also the stronger the electric charge unbalance between two spatial regions for example in a dipole magnet, the more the domain wall between these two regions opens up and more magnetic charge emanates from the domain wall out of the dark matter to the ordinary matter thus more electromagnetism.

If the above theory proves theoretical or/and experimental true, and we consequently then get rid of the "action at a distance" dogma and accept dark matter (magnetic monopole charge) as the elusive till now medium for energy and information transfer then we have also opened the gates and made the breakthrough for explaining gravity I submit.


EM

[Markoul]

Point of disagreement?

...continuing

Because opposite direction of the two jets of magnetic charge emanating from the Bloch region of every dipole magnet...

THERE IS NO MAGNETIC FLUX GOING FROM NORTH POLE TO SOUTH POLE OF MAGNET OR VICE VERSA! PERIOD.

Magnetic charge is circulating separately between each pole and the Bloch domain wall on each side of a dipole magnet forming two distinct magnetic bubbles or else hemispheres. These hemispheres have counter torque geometry.

Also notice after the generation of the magnetic field of a permanent magnet magnetic charge dipole jets pressure are pushing away all free electric charges towards the poles therefore we never get a voltage reading between the poles of a neodymium magnet (ferromagnets are dielectric) .

Magnetic charge trajectories are extending pass the physical dimensions of a magnet through space until eventually due electric charge blockage in space (remember electric charge is always fighting magnetic charge, they don't like each other) they fall back, colapse, to the magnetic poles, counter space void (dark circles on the ferrocell following the minimum energy loss path.

my2cents

EM

[TheoriaApophasis]

...continuing

my2cents

EM

A magnet doesnt have "poles", it has the inverse of counterspace, ie the Ether, etc (names are meaningless)

the so-called "bloch wall" (another meaningless concept) sits at the opposite of force and motion (ie magnetism),

sits at the opposite of space
sits at the opposite of magnitude

of course even saying "sits at" is still wrong.

[Markoul]

A magnet doesnt have "poles", it has the inverse of counterspace, ie the Ether, etc (names are meaningless)

the so-called "bloch wall" (another meaningless concept) sits at the opposite of force and motion (ie magnetism),

sits at the opposite of space
sits at the opposite of magnitude

of course even saying "sits at" is still wrong.

I agree name calling all the time the little poor magnet is rude!

[Ufopolitics]

Welcome Theoria!!

Is great to have you here -finally- TheoriaApophasis!!

So trying to establish a Final Geometry Shape for a Magnetic Field...

We have an empty "kind of tunnel" between each extreme end (namely poles) where both "tunnels" run (Axis Parallel) INWARDS towards the center or counterspace plane, where the accretion Disc (Dielectric Field) is at its Equator (center)...where related to "our space"...this type of cross (tunnel plus center plane) there is absolutely NADA...Nothing.

Do you agree with me that when we move a magnet in space, linearly (parallel) to its axis, we are "stirring" all electrons on its surrounding space in the same direction as Field Partial Spins add to full rotations?

If you agree with the above...then, say IF we would be able to "stir" electrons SPATIALLY THE SAME WAY as magnetic field does...but without any field present...and insert a coil within such space...do you think we could be able to collect Energy from those Spatial Electronic Spins?

Thanks in advance Ken!!


Warm Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

If you agree with the above...then, say IF we would be able to "stir" electrons
Ufopolitics

Whut? No such thing as "charge carrying particles". ie electrons.

Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science.
“To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble! Just to mention another improbability...” - Nikola Tesla
Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)

“My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large entity carrying a surface charge and is not an elementary unit (particle). When the ‘electron’ leaves an electrode of high potential and in a high vacuum it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than normal.” – N. Tesla

“To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.” – W. Russell

JJ Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard

“There is no rest mass to an ‘electron’. It is given here the ‘electron’ is no more than a broken loose “hold fast” under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.” – E. Dollard

“Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the ‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings

Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.

“Electrons as a separate, distinct entity…doesn’t really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a ‘field’.” - Dr. Steve Biller

You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their “force lines” is the “flow of electrons”; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance. There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; ‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.



This Electron = Particle BS is nothing more than Greek ATOMISM. The universe is NOT a giant sea of tiny pool balls rolling and banging and spinning.


How the so-called "electron microscope" REALLY works>
"Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses ‘electrons’ to form an image, specialpreparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the vacuum.

All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material. This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater”. The sputter coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum.

Argon gas and an electric field cause an ‘electron’ to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating ”

Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for “electron” microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he’s “shooting his electron gun”. A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it. This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor “lenses” of dielectric flux lines.

[Ufopolitics]

The "Nothing" of a Magnetic Field?



Is this the geometry of "nothing"?


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

Is this the geometry of "nothing"?
Ufopolitics

how about

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/42342708182/in/dateposted/

which is also same seen here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/

[Ufopolitics]

how about

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/42342708182/in/dateposted/

which is also same seen here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/

OK, So...your image shows:



Then redoing the Geo Volume of "Nothing" based on your graph...



I mean, could we connect both Hyperbolas into one Hyperboloid, plus disc to complete the Counterspace Volume?

Now related to Ferrocell...is it then showing the two Dielectric Hyperboloids?, since it clearly shows two separate volumes and a dividing center plane.

According to your image it shows a full magnetic "Torus" (contortion plane) from top to bottom of magnet axis...not likely observed on ferrocell.


Thanks


Ufopolitics

[Markoul]

how about

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/42342708182/in/dateposted/

which is also same seen here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/

Much better now!

Magnetic torus on each "pole" not crossing over the inertia plane disk. Sorry about the distortion of the image.

Magnetism emanates from the accretion disk coming out from the invisible dark energy domain as an aether manifestation.

[Ufopolitics]

Much better now!

Magnetic torus on each "pole" not crossing over the inertia plane disk. Sorry about the distortion of the image.

My Friend Markoul,

Please re-read drawing, the two white hyperbolas are called :Dielectric Hyperboloids

The Two Red Curves denote the Magnetic Torus profile

Magnetism emanates from the accretion disk coming out from the invisible dark energy domain as an aether manifestation.

According to what I have learned, it is the other way around...

Magnetism emanates from each two opposite ends (Centrifugal) to return to dielectric-accretion disk (Centripetal)

Hope this helps out..

Regards


Ufopolitics

[Markoul]

Magnetism emanates from each two opposite ends (Centrifugal) to return to dielectric-accretion disk (Centripetal)

Hope this helps out..

Regards


Ufopolitics

Dear Ufopolitcs,

Do you know whirlpools which eject?... they always suck (I am not talking about electric charge expelled by the plasma series of the primer fields video series, but purerly about magnetic energy and flux, remember magnetism pushes away, deflects electricity as you observe on the crt, they don't like each other)

Sorry to bust your bubble Ufopolitcs but magnetic radiation is generated and originates form zero thus the accretion disk (Bloch wall) coming out from aether domain (dark domain) into light matter (our domain):

In the wire-frame representation of the field you have created. Each torus on each pole of the magnet consists of elipsoid flux trajectories (I know Ken will now hate me for telling this, but just to show the flow of magnetic energy and with what we see in the ferrocell)

If you would apply vectors it would look like this:



Poles (dark void on the center of the pole) are really input portals and return points for the magnetic flux and energy.

So what is then the difference you ask me between "North" and "South" pole?

If you observe the image above (you have created ) we see the counter skew trajectories of the flux on the two poles. This creates a counter torque geometry or rotation if you prefer between the two poles. North pole vortex is whirling from an observer CCW and South pole CW. Of course all this happen in superluminal speed and we perceive only the magnetic field as a static field.

EM