This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quantum particles and Aether.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quantum particles and Aether.


  • #2

    Comment


    • #3
      Some details

      Charles' Law was formulated in 1787
      . . . . . .
      because gas consist on particles i take this law to the particles.
      this is my first heretical -idea.

      and because Charles' Law belongs to the temperature
      of absolute zero T=0K i take this law to the nothingness - vacuum T=0K
      it is my second heretical-idea

      and because Charles' Law belongs to the theory of ideal gas
      i take this theory to the nothingness- vacuum
      this is my third heretical - idea
      ==,,

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by socratus View Post
        They must have geometrical form of a circle: pi= c /d =3,14 . .
        ( All another geometrical forms : triangle, square, rectangle . . .etc
        have angles and to create angles need forces,
        without forces all geometrical forms must turn into circle.)


        ===.
        Best wishes.
        Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
        ===.
        check this out :

        0 (number) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        India

        The concept of zero as a number and not merely a symbol for separation is attributed to India, where, by the 9th century AD, practical calculations were carried out using zero, which was treated like any other number, even in case of division.[13][14] The Indian scholar Pingala (circa 5th-2nd century BC) used binary numbers in the form of short and long syllables (the latter equal in length to two short syllables), making it similar to Morse code.[15][16] He and his contemporary Indian scholars used the Sanskrit word śūnya to refer to zero or void.
        ..... your ideas are not so heretical after all

        and because Charles' Law belongs to the theory of ideal gas
        i take this theory to the nothingness- vacuum
        this is my third heretical - idea
        makes sense that aether is "the ideal gas" .....
        Signs and symbols -Confucius.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by MonsieurM View Post
          check this out :

          0 (number) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          ..... your ideas are not so heretical after all

          makes sense that aether is "the ideal gas" .....
          Physics news Update 768Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything | DiscoverMagazine.com
          #
          . . . .etc.
          ==..

          Comment


          • #6
            I see what you are getting at now Socrates. I must agree the fundamentals of aether is the perfect vacuum. I wonder though, shouldn't a vacuum exsist in an atom in which case there would be unaccounted for energy in e=mc^2 for an atom bomb? Or perhaps that is the amount of energy released from collapsing the vacuum?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Ruphus View Post
              I see what you are getting at now Socrates.
              I must agree the fundamentals of aether is the perfect vacuum.
              I wonder though, shouldn't a vacuum exsist in an atom in which
              case there would be unaccounted for energy in e=mc^2 for an atom bomb?
              Or perhaps that is the amount of energy released from collapsing the vacuum?

              Comment


              • #8
                Interesting that you feel an atom is mainly empty space. I think you may be missing a critical point, no space is empty. There must be a medium in which the EM field of the subatomic particals travels through. It is still aether there as well I would assume. Like you pointed out it is all speculation and we may never figure it out.

                I like your thoughts on temperature, very interesting. How about vacuum pressures vs potential? Any thoughts there?

                Comment


                • #9
                  I will have to read up more on QED. I don't see how E is infinite when we can create and destroy electrons in pair production.

                  Comment


                  • #10

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X