Tweet
Important problem in CPU Fan design
I dont post so often and my time is limited, so appologies for my bad choice of words, lack of tutorial guidance and repetition of previous post's content.
Firstly, thanks the Imhoteps and the Bedini and their associates for the design, it leads to my first time entering the world of resonance and gravity energy! (to my understanding
)
Important problem in CPU Fan design is battery venting!
I made a C,CW,C,CW standard Imhotep-Bedini CPU fan SSG, after long time of experimenting I gexperiencing the following pros and cons:
pros:
1. Battery internal resistance is reduced, but battery charging unsuccessful!
2. Charging process is totally cold or heat is not produced anythere.
3. The current use is interspatial DC while normal CPU fan use constant direct current. The interspatial current efficiency depends on the current capability of the transistor (1N3055 is running efficient and cool, 1N13001 is so hot and fan have no force for spining).
cons:
1. Venting of battery, use large capacitor to prevent venting but then battery do not charge at all (probably because resonance to the battery is disturbed).
2. winding difficulties, including need inductance LC meter for winding calibration, which is for better resonance, and frustration on small things
.
C, C, CW,CW design I tried is better, with less power/inductance/pulse strength, but venting is greatly reduced, battery accepting charging etc.
The theory behind battery venting could be that the 1N4001 diode placed between base and emitter of the transisor short cutting the excessive pulse force from the trigger winding. But C,CW,C,CW design cannot unload excessive pulse force onto the trigger winding, causing excessive force onto fan wheel rotation (out of resonance) and hydrogen produced on battery. The final result is a more powerful fan but less of a charger.
Peace to all
I dont post so often and my time is limited, so appologies for my bad choice of words, lack of tutorial guidance and repetition of previous post's content.
Firstly, thanks the Imhoteps and the Bedini and their associates for the design, it leads to my first time entering the world of resonance and gravity energy! (to my understanding
)Important problem in CPU Fan design is battery venting!
I made a C,CW,C,CW standard Imhotep-Bedini CPU fan SSG, after long time of experimenting I gexperiencing the following pros and cons:
pros:
1. Battery internal resistance is reduced, but battery charging unsuccessful!
2. Charging process is totally cold or heat is not produced anythere.
3. The current use is interspatial DC while normal CPU fan use constant direct current. The interspatial current efficiency depends on the current capability of the transistor (1N3055 is running efficient and cool, 1N13001 is so hot and fan have no force for spining).
cons:
1. Venting of battery, use large capacitor to prevent venting but then battery do not charge at all (probably because resonance to the battery is disturbed).
2. winding difficulties, including need inductance LC meter for winding calibration, which is for better resonance, and frustration on small things
.C, C, CW,CW design I tried is better, with less power/inductance/pulse strength, but venting is greatly reduced, battery accepting charging etc.
The theory behind battery venting could be that the 1N4001 diode placed between base and emitter of the transisor short cutting the excessive pulse force from the trigger winding. But C,CW,C,CW design cannot unload excessive pulse force onto the trigger winding, causing excessive force onto fan wheel rotation (out of resonance) and hydrogen produced on battery. The final result is a more powerful fan but less of a charger.
Peace to all
Comment