ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Markoul]

This is highest level engineering Ufopolitics!

I hope you the best in your endeavors for finding enlightenment my friend and look forward for your new youtube videos and findings.

One more thing, there is a German Dr. back in research gate science platform and forum who when I to showed him your video about the separated two magnetic bubbles on a coil powered with d.c. he accused you for fraud and said that you changed the sense of the coil midway!!:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpAb8vfah0c&t=323s[/VIDEO]


quote from RG forum:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is...her_hemisphere

5 days ago

Emmanouil Markoulakis
Added an answer
On support and apart of the context of this thread, of proposed new field magnetic dipole geometry, thus magnetic dipole field consisting of two separated magnetic bubbles each residing on and around each physical pole of a magnet and separated at the middle of a magnetic dipole field where the domain wall of the field is located, I post here this video from an independent researcher (I can not put my own stuff here prior the publication). Notice he is using a compass with has 4-degrees of freedom (4 DoF) in motion so can really show vertical and horizontal components of the magnetic flux of a dipole field.
Please compare the results of his demonstration with my previous Fig. E, F and G:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpAb8vfah0c&t=73s

Emmanouil

...

5 days ago

Ulrich Mutze
Added an answer
Oh Emmanouil,
your independent researcher played a trick on you by changing the winding sense in the middle of the coil. As you see, I rejoined the club - too amusing what you are coming up with.

...

5 days ago

Emmanouil Markoulakis
Added an answer
I am always starting my criticism and judgement on others research in good faith although there is a lot of fraud on the internet. However in this case I know this guy and although not an academic he is a very experienced technician and empirical engineer and don't let his youtube personality fool you. He is a man of integrity i came to trust and we regularly exchange emails.
The best way i believe is to replicate his experiment.
Kind Regards,
Emmanouil

I think you should login to RG (don't need to be and academic, there are many independent researchers there, Timm is also there) and personally answer to this Doctor...

Here is also his profile page on RG... you can private message him:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ulrich_Mutze


your friend

EM

[Ufopolitics]

This is highest level engineering Ufopolitics!

I hope you the best in your endeavors for finding enlightenment my friend and look forward for your new youtube videos and findings.

One more thing, there is a German Dr. back in research gate science platform and forum who when I to showed him your video about the separated two magnetic bubbles on a coil powered with d.c. he accused you for fraud and said that you changed the sense of the coil midway!!:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpAb8vfah0c&t=323s[/VIDEO]


quote from RG forum:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is...her_hemisphere




...



...



I think you should login to RG (don't need to be and academic, there are many independent researchers there, Timm is also there) and personally answer to this Doctor...

Here is also his profile page on RG... you can private message him:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ulrich_Mutze


your friend

EM

Hello Markoul,

Thanks friend!

You know that's the problem when people get too high on their horse...
And this fact also applies to Dr in Sciences...they get so high that consider such a simple experiment as to be done at "school levels"...not belonging to an "Academic"..

When in reality the easiest way to find out if am cheating or not is ONLY BY REPLICATION..of same experiment.

And NOPE I did not wound coil at different directions from the middle!
I have other very old video where I pulse with square wave same coil...and then magnet becomes a spinning rotor..


Kind regards Markoul


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

@Markoul,

Here is the video from March 2012 (6 years by now)..that I was talking about.

[VIDEO]https://youtu.be/TYOwKkNs4lk[/VIDEO]

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Markoul]

And NOPE I did not wound coil at different directions from the middle!
I have other very old video where I pulse with square wave same coil...and then magnet becomes a spinning rotor..

No need you to prove to me anything I have the utmost respect for you, you are a pioneer.

However you should pay a visit to the good Doctor...

[Ufopolitics]

No need you to prove to me anything I have the utmost respect for you, you are a pioneer.

However you should pay a visit to the good Doctor...

Markoul...We got enough with Bistander here...another doctorate...


take care


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

For those readers, a peer review of member Markoul's work is shown below. It supports my position in the disagreements I've had with him, and UfoPolitics.
bi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTV1EVb-V2c

Description
On the Bloch Wall and the Misconceptions Surrounding Peer Review

By FractalWoman

This video is a quasi-review of a paper called "The Quantum Field of a Magnet" by Emmanouil Markoulakis. Although it might seem like I am picking on the author in this video (and I am a little), that is not why I am doing this. In reality, EM and I have the same goal in mind. We both want to understand how the ferrocell works. EM thinks I am misguided and I think he is misguided. But the only thing that really matters (and the only thing that anyone cares about) is the demonstrable truth and not some hypothetical truth that is impossible to prove.

Computer simulations are a kind of proof. If you can't demonstrate your "theory" via computer simulations, then it is of no use to me. I am a computer scientist. I have been for a long time. I need logic, I need clarity, and I NEED CODE, in order to fully understand a concept. When I wanted to understand the torus knot, I wrote some code. When I wanted to understand Ionel Dinu's Aether circulation model, I wrote some code.

AB's CODE clearly demonstrated TO ME how the ferrocell works. It is not an over simplification in my opinion, nor is it a "cartoon". It is the real deal. This is exactly what I was looking for (and what the other ferrocell researchers were unable to produce). In my mind, a computer simulation of the ferrocell is the BEST way to show how a ferrocell works and AB's simulation succeeds in every case that I try. So, in terms of understanding HOW a ferrocell works, I am satisfied with the results.

But it doesn't end there for me. This is actually just the beginning. Now that I have all the tools I need to simulate the ferrocell, I also have all the tools I need to simulate my Aether model. This is why I really needed the the ferrocell simulation code (aside from making pretty pictures). In my Aether model, space is, for all intents and purposes, a "ferrofluid", aka. a colloidal solution of polarizable entities. Using AB's simulation software, I should be able to simulate this in 3D. Not projected 3D or holographic 3D but REAL 3D. So I am very excited about this. That is all I am going to say about this for now.

However, as a starting point for my Aether model, you might want to read (or re-read) this paper I wrote called "A Medium for the Propagation of Light, Revisited" which can be found here:

https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...

All the pieces of the puzzle are starting to come together. I'm so excited.
----------------------------------------

Here is a link to EM's paper on ResearchGate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...