Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera

[Netica]

Hello Marathonman,

I very much, did not understand what you had said from post 1183
"as the brush rotates currant enters from set N & S causing two opposing fields" I understood the opposite, until you said "It was difficult at first realizing it flows from - to +."

I would like to understand how it is known that current flows from - to +,. How did you learn it?, and how could it be shown?

This is very important to understand - "actually it seams currant flows one way and voltage the other" Anything further that could be shown regarding this would be great. I am not so much refering to Clemente's machine as I get what you are saying in this regard, rather a more general understanding about current and voltage flowing in the opposite directions.

Thanks for sharing your work and knowledge.

[marathonman]

Flow

It was difficult at first realizing it flows from - to +. was it Ben Franklin that had a 50/50 chance and got it wrong. the status quo is stuck on not letting true information out as this would ruin not only relativity and Quantum Mechanics but the science community as a whole. and to think good ole J.P. Morgan started it all.
actually it seams currant flows one way and voltage the other. it is a crying shame that in 2016 that such little and correct information can be had on the subject. i think society as a whole is waking up to the fact that that all the info we have access through schooling is either wrong, tainted or down right lacking in completeness. J.P. Morgan is a prim example as he had school books pulled, had them changed, then put back into circulation. the entire history of all countries are based on Corporate, Government manipulation.

hopefully things are changing for the better but is it to late as the power Elite have devastating plans and most of us are not apart of it.

what really amazes me is so very little people know about Clemente Figuera. almost every person i talk to including corporate America and science community knows nothing of him so almost needless to say i either get ignored, get told free energy is not possible (we know this is a lie) or they show interest until money is involved. i wish i could get some scientist and money backers involved in this project, sure would be nice. at this point in time i would settle for a little backing.

here is link to DipTrace free for Schematic capture, PCB layout ect. the free version is 300 pin 2 layer. Download DipTrace - DipTrace


MM

[Cadman]

I have been reading and studying about inductors an relating that to part G.
as the brush rotates currant enters from set N & S causing two opposing fields. as the brush approaches set N the winding's are reducing as is cross section of core causing an increase in currant discharge while the winding's are increasing as is cross section of core for set S causing an decrease in currant discharge.
eyes wobbling to much.

MM

Thank you for this post. I have been looking at the current flow backwards.
sheesh
CM

[hanon1492]

How dense can you be be. one device different winding configuration and voltages hanon.

In fact different winding configuration, different cores (in one case both primaries and secondaries are 3" long, in the other case primaries 4" long, secondaries 2" long) , and different driving parameters. But both cases having the same output power (300 W). Sorry to tell it but I see something weird in that. I have just exposed the data that you posted. If you are incomodated with that then it is because something is not straight. A saying tells the truth offend.

[marathonman]

inductor

I have been reading and studying about inductors an relating that to part G.
as the brush rotates currant enters from set N & S causing two opposing fields. as the brush approaches set N the winding's are reducing as is cross section of core causing an increase in currant discharge while the winding's are increasing as is cross section of core for set S causing an decrease in currant discharge.
eyes wobbling to much.

MM

[marathonman]

Good news

Congrats on your Autotransformer .

yes that would nice if that is all we had to do.
i'll keep my fingers crossed for the DC test.
may be you can calculate it at 1.11 and see what happens i results.


MM

[Cadman]

Well I just put power to my autotransformer and am pleased to report that it works perfectly.
24vac in and 15 usable taps with voltage from 27.4 down to 1.5 in 15 even increments.

So if want to build a high powered AC variac then the spreadsheet will calculate it perfectly for you.

Next step is to build the rotating brush and run DC through it and see what the difference is.

Wouldn't it be great if all we had to do to calculate a part G was to change the 4.44 constant to 1.1?

Cheers,
CM

[marathonman]

How dense can you be be. one device different winding configuration and voltages hanon.
get on with it hanon, if you spent more time building and less time running your mouth, maybe, just maybe you would have a working device but i doubt it will ever take place because you will probably argue with yourself.
subject over in my book.

MM

[hanon1492]

So , you sold both of your 100 W in / 300 W out devices, the one described in your post in the 10th of september and the one described in overunuty forum, because they both are different designs. It was curious to me that both have exactly the same input/output results.

[marathonman]

Image posting

when posting an image on this web sit it will burn up your very little space they give you. as i know it has been discussed before, i just wanted people to know that post image dot org has a windows app that allows you to post pics from your desktop and gives you the direct url to that image to be imbedded in your post through insert image button. it says screen capture tool but does the before mentioned also.
just right click postimage, at top of menu is post image, click that then chose pic or pics to upload, click copy link then insert image button here then that's it.

the link here https://postimg.org
it works great.

MM

[marathonman]

Hrothgar;
it was my confusion, sorry.

hanon;
I have already clarified that in the pm to you yesterday. i tried multiple arrangements and yes those are some of them and yes they both put out 300 watts. so what is so difficult about that.
if i am correct, it was last year wasn't it, before i found out what part G really was, not resistors.
and yes that is correct i did sell the unit on OU to purchase the pure iron core i have now that one can see in my picture album on this web site.


MM

[hanon1492]

Well i went to storage today. you know all that Texas rain we been having, well half of it is in my storage rental. one blob of wet cardboard.

but lucky for you Mario i have my soaking wet note book. ink is f-ed up but here it goes.

primaries and secondaries are 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" x 3".

Primary winding are 18 awg wire @ 300 turn ruffly. what i had on hand.

secondaries are 14 aug @ 90 turns i think, ink bad. what i had on hand.

input was 50 volts @ 2 amp.

output was 40 volts per core series to 80 volts @ 3.75 amp.

wire used for resistance was Nichrome wire either 60 or 80, but can't make out the rest.

it is easy to calculate with Ohm calculator like here.
http://www.electronics2000.co.uk/

very good tool to have on computer.


MM

In the 10th of september you posted the design parameter of your 100W input / 300W output (see quoted post above) answering to the questions of some users.

But according to some data on overunity dot com forum some months ago you design was the next that I quote below:

"the primaries have to be no less than equal to your secondary and/or larger. my primaries were changed to 4 inches long with the secondary 2 inches long and am getting great results. because if it was the other way around the magnetic field of the primaries would not extend past the secondary as Figuera intended.

wind your secondary 1/4 inch from the edge of the secondary core and the same with the primaries, this will have a 1/2 inch total gap between them. please secure your device so parts don't fly and cut off important body parts. then pulse them according to Figuera's timing specs.

the device will work with just one but not very good. for some reason it showed up better when i used two sets

I have powered three 100 watt lights with 100 volt 1 amp with two section unit with no diminish

First off my primaries are larger than my secondaries.
primaries are wound with 22 awg 600 plus turns (6 layers) 3.2 inches long
secondaries are 10 awg, layers are up to you, i have three at 2 inches long= 19 turns per layer. final unit will be wound with 10 awg Square.

resistance does not matter as it is up to your resistor network that dictates that. what ever voltage you want to use just remember the currant is controlled by your resistor network that is why i chose 22 awg instead of 26 awg.

yes for now i am using a commutator at 60 cps

i have never posted the commutator i am using, it was my own design, works good to and is easy to build using only a shaft, three commutators and a small motor. oh and wire wound resistors encased in resin.

Figuera used 100 volts then so did i. if you are not comfortable use variac to get the voltage you are comfortable with.

I calculate my primaries at 8.7 ohm give or take not 12, that puts me at 70 ohm for the set. the resistors control the currant not the wires so it will be ok."

Could you please clarify which was your real device to get 300W output, the device that you said that have been sold?

I see both sets of data have different core sizes, different wire diameter, but for some reason both have the same input (100 W) and output (300 W)

If you so kind to clarify those two set of designs. Thanks

[Hrothgar]

Oops

I thought u were talking about his solid state transformer. However the 2primaries in my example change resistance in a dynamic fashion.

[marathonman]

Figuera Device

Hrothgar;
Are you actually describing the Figuera device or another device because your description is not even close to what the patent implies.

Figueras device is two independent magnetic fields occupying the same relative space in space outside there their core. the secondary is then placed in this space that according to William Hooper and others data and research that a duel or double strength E field is formed.

and referring to part G, it is a dynamic magnetic resistor that changes currant flow to both sets of primaries as the brush rotates making contact on the winding's which add or subtract winding's and core material as it rotates.

Cadman;

"I would LOVE to have a Figuera gen that put out that much!"

That is only 7200 watts, making it 15 or 20 kilowatts is just as easy. then you will be off the grid.


MM

[Hrothgar]

I did not post a link that I know of?!

2halves one on each end makes sense I just see it as one coil since I see it with no break in the wire. You might have seen it as one bobbin even tho the second half of the example clearly implied it could not be one coil as it had to be in two places at once. For ease of visualization,. 4 bobbins 2 for the primary 2 for the secondary. Secondaries arranged so they oppose each other if energized. Primaries cap secondaries on both ends also opposing each other if energized. The primary should push on the secondary til it's reactive Pressure/state collapses into the load. After that the primary should raise its own resistance by opposing itself as a resistor, shutting itself off until the end of the cycle.