Hi guys,
I have been posting some of my experiment results in other peoples threads. Now, I create new topic to discuss and report testing results based on my experiment with hydroxy and Honda Accord 1.8L (1981 model).
So far I made few test run before and after car repair (engine oil leakage problem). I'm going to report test results after the repair.
Base millage reading taken without hydroxy
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.34L/100KM (0% savings)
I use 13 plates semi series cell (3mm hole at bottom of each plate) to generate hydroxy which runs above 90% efficiency. The gas goes in to vacuum manifold at carburetor.
Leaning fuel done as below:
Millage reading taken with hydroxy and lean fuel maximum (Test 1)
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.49L/100KM (2.31% lose)
Test observation
I feel the engine power reduced a bit. I need to shift to lower gear to climb up hill road or by press more gas. Onces I had the high idling speed problem (2000 rpm at half way testing) so I turned off the electrolyser and race the engine few times and the idling rpm comes to normal even after turn on electrolyser. So I think the high rpm could be due to carburetor fuel cable spring doesn't work properly to pull back.
I didn't notice any other problem by running hydroxy into intake manifold. At the end of run the electrolyser consumes about 20A so I guess hydroxy production is somewhere 1.5LPM to 1.8LPM.
Question
Why the car uses more fuel compared?
Is it because of fuel leaned too much and I need to press fuel peddal lower during up hill climbing?
Next testing plan
I'm thinking of increase more fuel into carburetor by turning know anti clock wise. Probably I need to set fuel not too lean. I may increase the fuel while observing the rpm meter (should not fluctuate) with load.
Please help to post your suggestion to improve my future test results.
I have been posting some of my experiment results in other peoples threads. Now, I create new topic to discuss and report testing results based on my experiment with hydroxy and Honda Accord 1.8L (1981 model).
So far I made few test run before and after car repair (engine oil leakage problem). I'm going to report test results after the repair.
Base millage reading taken without hydroxy
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.34L/100KM (0% savings)
I use 13 plates semi series cell (3mm hole at bottom of each plate) to generate hydroxy which runs above 90% efficiency. The gas goes in to vacuum manifold at carburetor.
Leaning fuel done as below:
- Start the engine and let it run a while to warm up.
- Engine speed reaches 1000 rpm (idle speed).
- Turn on the electrolyser without injecting hydroxy into engine. Engine speed reduced slightly lower than 1000 rpm.
- Start to turn fuel knob clock wise until engine starts jerking (almost fully closed). Engine speed drop to 750 rpm and fluctuates a bit.
- Inject hydroxy into intake manifold vacuum. The engine rpm stablize a bit.
- Take the car for test ride.
Millage reading taken with hydroxy and lean fuel maximum (Test 1)
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.49L/100KM (2.31% lose)
Test observation
I feel the engine power reduced a bit. I need to shift to lower gear to climb up hill road or by press more gas. Onces I had the high idling speed problem (2000 rpm at half way testing) so I turned off the electrolyser and race the engine few times and the idling rpm comes to normal even after turn on electrolyser. So I think the high rpm could be due to carburetor fuel cable spring doesn't work properly to pull back.
I didn't notice any other problem by running hydroxy into intake manifold. At the end of run the electrolyser consumes about 20A so I guess hydroxy production is somewhere 1.5LPM to 1.8LPM.
Question
Why the car uses more fuel compared?
Is it because of fuel leaned too much and I need to press fuel peddal lower during up hill climbing?
Next testing plan
I'm thinking of increase more fuel into carburetor by turning know anti clock wise. Probably I need to set fuel not too lean. I may increase the fuel while observing the rpm meter (should not fluctuate) with load.
Please help to post your suggestion to improve my future test results.
I really appreciate it. About O2 sensor, my car is 1981 Honda Accord which uses carburetor. I'm going to test another round today with hydroxy. In previous test, the fuel was too lean. Today, I'm going to adjust the fuel knob to allow a little bit more fuel and see if this makes any difference.
Comment