Cold Fuze Glow Plasma Radiation Test

[kenssurplus]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aauj5RHz_gY

This is a replication of Jean Luis Naudin's A.P.E. electrolisys cell experiment. This was done to look into the 4 following areas:
Glow discharge anomalies perhaps related to EVO or cavitation.
Radiation generation by either glow or plasma discharges.
Transmutation of elements or creation of extra matter.
Temperature effects on the above areas.

Plasma discharges showed an associated radiation emission, whereas glow discharges did not show appreciable radiation.
Experimental conditions and changes caused the data collected to be unusable except in the widest generalities.

The test device consists of a glass Fuze bottle with two tungsten electrodes stuck through a wooden lid. Attached to the tungsten electrodes are alligator clips running to a D.C. capacitor ( two 1000 mf caps paralleled) which is fed by a Full Wave Bridge rectifier. 240 volts AC from house mains goes into the FWBR.

A well respected researcher owns and operates the gieger counter and helps with the test.

Be safe.

[Jeff Pearson]

Thank you for this. Most of us don't have geiger counters. I find this highly interesting and not just in relation to electroylisis.

[kenssurplus]

Thank you Jeff for your interest and your comment. I firmly believe there is more to this everyday water than we have been led to believe.

Spread the knowledge.

[genessc]

Makes me wish I didn't cook my Mazur PRM-9000 with the high voltage experiments... It can't detect anything anymore so I must have caused some sort of damage to the tube by keeping it in the garage where I do the ion chair work.

What sort of radiation did you detect from it under both states? was it in mS? or Rads? I'm more familiar with microsieverts as thats what I used to measure in. Local background radiation in the bay area is about .120mS-.200mS, that was at 10sec sample averaging, and has been since after fukushima when I purchased that originally. I haven't been able to measure for the last 6 months or so, so I've no idea if its skewed at all.

Did you measure the DC behind the fwbr for volts and amp consumption in both states under water? What'd you note?

.... watching the vid now... maybe you already showed what I'm askin.

Its interesting how you have to have that one electrode just touching the surface of the water huh. Oh and you dosed it with Lye huh....

You read up on any of that Keshe stuff? He uses Lye... in a whole different way... I gotta take a second look at that guy, waiting on his second book.

Gene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aauj5RHz_gY

This is a replication of Jean Luis Naudin's A.P.E. electrolisys cell experiment. This was done to look into the 4 following areas:
Glow discharge anomalies perhaps related to EVO or cavitation.
Radiation generation by either glow or plasma discharges.
Transmutation of elements or creation of extra matter.
Temperature effects on the above areas.

Plasma discharges showed an associated radiation emission, whereas glow discharges did not show appreciable radiation.
Experimental conditions and changes caused the data collected to be unusable except in the widest generalities.

The test device consists of a glass Fuze bottle with two tungsten electrodes stuck through a wooden lid. Attached to the tungsten electrodes are alligator clips running to a D.C. capacitor ( two 1000 mf caps paralleled) which is fed by a Full Wave Bridge rectifier. 240 volts AC from house mains goes into the FWBR.

A well respected researcher owns and operates the gieger counter and helps with the test.

Be safe.

[kenssurplus]

Makes me wish I didn't cook my Mazur PRM-9000 with the high voltage experiments... It can't detect anything anymore so I must have caused some sort of damage to the tube by keeping it in the garage where I do the ion chair work.

What sort of radiation did you detect from it under both states? was it in mS? or Rads? I'm more familiar with microsieverts as thats what I used to measure in. Local background radiation in the bay area is about .120mS-.200mS, that was at 10sec sample averaging, and has been since after fukushima when I purchased that originally. I haven't been able to measure for the last 6 months or so, so I've no idea if its skewed at all.

Did you measure the DC behind the fwbr for volts and amp consumption in both states under water? What'd you note?

.... watching the vid now... maybe you already showed what I'm askin.

Its interesting how you have to have that one electrode just touching the surface of the water huh. Oh and you dosed it with Lye huh....

You read up on any of that Keshe stuff? He uses Lye... in a whole different way... I gotta take a second look at that guy, waiting on his second book.

Gene

Gene, the geiger counter that was used read out in "milliroentgens per hour" in 3 different scales (I don''t have it available now so cant verify what the scales were).
here is the conversions from:https://answers.yahoo.com/question/i...1212725AAeN5Ds

Best Answer: Most Geiger counters measure radioactivity in several units. A common one is "counts per minute". You will also see measurements in both mrem/hr and µSv/h. The µSv (microSievert) is an internationally accepted unit for tissue dosage. The REM (Roentgen Equivalent Man) was much more common in the past, but is still in use.

1 rem = 0.01 Sv = 10 mSv = 10,000 µSv
1 mrem = 0.001 rem = 10 uSv

=========================

Units of Measurement (Radiation)
1 rad = 0.01 gray (Gy)
1 rem = 0.01 sievert (Sv)
1 gray (Gy) = 100 rad
1 sievert (Sv) = 100 rem
Rad and Gray are ‘absorbed dose’ units.
Rem and Sievert are ‘equivalent dose’ units.
This is from Radiation and the UV Index...
pisgahchemist · 4 years ago

I didn't record the DC volts and amps as that was not part of the original criteria looked at. Although, I do sort of remember an initial test showing ~1/2 amp @ 240 VAC, but that would change with addition of electrolyte and depth of electrodes, temp of solution, etc. All of those conditions changed so the data would not be usable at all.