I never thought I would slowly learn a little here and a little there of what Eric has spoken of.
Eric has said that the Earth cannot be used to push against since it is serving as the medium of transmission for Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter at Wardenclyffe. So, instead, it uses a virtual ground whose consequence is no emission from the tower. This is in contradistinction to modern-day so-called Tesla coils which do just that: waste leakage for a spectacular lightning show.
I stumbled on a simple modification to a resonating tank circuit which exemplifies this principle of a virtual ground according to Microsoft Bing Copilot's version of an AI.
AI initially scoffed at the ridiculous numeric simulated results and that is in keeping with its lack of resistances, its lack of any load, etc. According to AI, this is due to numeric artifacts, aka: rounding errors accumulating over time. This may be true. But, so what? It teaches a principle about virtual grounds nonetheless.
And Jim Murray has already spoken (at one of his presentations) concerning one of his inventions and what happens when a motor, any motor, operates under a no-load condition. Namely, it seems to exhibit overunity. And this no-load condition is well-known among engineers.
But the thought of stumbling upon a virtual ground: what it looks like in terms of its behavioral characteristics, is fascinating. It is a node, located somewhere within a circuit which does not vary its amplitude a whole lot despite the nearby presence of an easy access to ground which this virtual node makes no use of. This virtual ground ignores Earth ground. This has the consequence of disallowing much of any current to escape to ground. Instead, it builds up within the system.
This accumulation may be predominantly composed of reactive power, rather than real power. I don't know and I don't care since AI is not willing to go there since AI insists that this defies Conservation of Energy since so little energy prompted this response.
Whatever ...
Virtual Ground - by Vinyasi - Is Free Energy for Real?
Eric has said that the Earth cannot be used to push against since it is serving as the medium of transmission for Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter at Wardenclyffe. So, instead, it uses a virtual ground whose consequence is no emission from the tower. This is in contradistinction to modern-day so-called Tesla coils which do just that: waste leakage for a spectacular lightning show.
I stumbled on a simple modification to a resonating tank circuit which exemplifies this principle of a virtual ground according to Microsoft Bing Copilot's version of an AI.
AI initially scoffed at the ridiculous numeric simulated results and that is in keeping with its lack of resistances, its lack of any load, etc. According to AI, this is due to numeric artifacts, aka: rounding errors accumulating over time. This may be true. But, so what? It teaches a principle about virtual grounds nonetheless.
And Jim Murray has already spoken (at one of his presentations) concerning one of his inventions and what happens when a motor, any motor, operates under a no-load condition. Namely, it seems to exhibit overunity. And this no-load condition is well-known among engineers.
But the thought of stumbling upon a virtual ground: what it looks like in terms of its behavioral characteristics, is fascinating. It is a node, located somewhere within a circuit which does not vary its amplitude a whole lot despite the nearby presence of an easy access to ground which this virtual node makes no use of. This virtual ground ignores Earth ground. This has the consequence of disallowing much of any current to escape to ground. Instead, it builds up within the system.
This accumulation may be predominantly composed of reactive power, rather than real power. I don't know and I don't care since AI is not willing to go there since AI insists that this defies Conservation of Energy since so little energy prompted this response.
Whatever ...
Virtual Ground - by Vinyasi - Is Free Energy for Real?
Comment