Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[cody]

Holy cow, Dollard is on the forum

Mr Dollard what an honor it is to see you posting here. I really hope you will consider sticking around and giving some direction to all the experimenters here. Ive soaked up all i could from the few videos of you there are and am working on a project along those lines. You said enough in the videos to give a good start for experimenters i think, and im looking forward to working with high voltage and huge circulating currents. Anyways, thanks for sharing everything you have and i hope you will consider sharing more.

Thanks
Cody

[amigo]

Also,

Charles Steinmetz - Elementary Lectures on Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses.pdf

[amigo]

Concerning the Excitation of Electrical Waves Through Parameter Changes (Russian 1934).pdf

My Russian is a bit rusty though, anyone else can volunteer for a translation?

[baroutologos]

Its very nice to read from a man heavily involved in Tesla's work and overunity issues.

You explanations delight me as many others i suppose concerning the scalar and wave explanations. I am not a EE neither i know about equations but i can perceive a logical explanation when i hear one ( i think)

Mr Dollard,
this site is devoted to renewable energy via unorthodox methods as Tesla alleged ways of "free energy" etc.

Is there any way of achieving free energy that is way cost efficient than solar or wind power?
If yes, Are you in possition to teach a mostly uneducated crowd (myself included) to basic methodology results oriented?

In any case i will appreciate a straight answer.

Salutes,

[Schpankme]

(RG + XB) + j (XG – RB) = propagation constant squared

RG is the scalar or DC component that is NOT A WAVE,
It is DC and has NO FREQUENCY, no WAVELENGTH and thus NO WAVE!
SCALER = NO WAVE - GET IT???

Eric,

In honor of you and the impact that your teaching has had on me. I named my two dogs (liter mates) Scalar and Wave, almost 14 years ago. Today my wife was looking over my shoulder while I was commenting on your latest post; she looks at me and says, “So this is how you came up with names of 'our' dogs; they are two different animals, just like the man says!” I love it.

Thank you,

Schpankme

[Slovenia]

Thank You

Hi Eric,

Thanks for sharing with us again. Coyotes are very smart fellows, they have survived incredible odds against them. You are like having Tesla himself in our midst. Just having you present with us is nice.

Best Regards,
Slovenia

[Dollard, E. P. (N6KPH)]

Scalar explained...

...for those who’s minds have been polluted by the prevalent quantum goddess reality:

Let us turn to the Heaviside Equation which is the most fundamental equations in all of Electrical Engineering:

(RG + XB) + j (XG – RB) = propagation constant squared

where:

R resistance in Ohms
G conductance in Siemens
X reactance in Henrys per second
B susceptance in Farads per second

Therefore:

RG is the scalar or DC component that is NOT A WAVE,
XB is the longitudinal or AC component and is an alternating electric wave

XG is the transverse or OC component and is a forward moving oscillating electric wave. RB is the transverse or OC component and is a reverse moving oscillating electric wave

This equation allows for all electrical conditions in time and or space and combinations thereof. The example equation is the dimensions of time (see: Steinmetz Theory of Transient Electric Waves and Phenomenon and also my paper: Symbolic Representation of the Generalized Electric Wave.)

Example:

The air in the room; the room is filled with air and has atmospheric pressure of 2998 mB, your stereo is blasting away, the speakers are creating longitudinal waves having length and frequency and exert a oscillating force centered on 2998 mB (+ or – 10 mB)

RG is the air pressure, a scalar
XB is the sound of the stereo, a longitudinal wave

XG = RB, thus no transverse waves exist (XG – RB) = ZERO

Hence (RG + XB) is what is going on in the room, the disinformers have convinced you that this whole quantity (RB + XB) is scalar, RG is the only scalar component. It is DC and has NO FREQUENCY, no WAVELENGTH and thus NO WAVE! SCALER = NO WAVE - GET IT???

If people don’t get this fundamental concept – my time is better spent talking to my pet Coyote… I have nothing further to say…

[boguslaw]

I don't know why you are doing this ! Bearden theories are cryptic but actually the essential part is "not killing the dipole" and that is the truth, that one statement is all what is needed from Bearden teaching.
If he is teaching that , he is the honest guy, but because he do not teach how to accomplish that effect I suppose he is controlled and cannot speak freely.
He is pointing to the correct sources and only our laziness don't allow us to read and analyse those old texts.

He is doing the same as Don Smith - hiding a lot of tips among nonsense , cryptic statements.

[DavidE]

???

They strong armed their way into my Desert laboratory to steal all related equipment. The property owner of the desert lab died shortly thereafter, within weeks of Chris Carson’s death. Friends of yours Peter?

Who can you trust these days....

[Sputins]

Thank you for your post Eric.

It’s an absolute honour to hear from you Eric!

I yelled out loud and nearly fell off my chair and even I took some of the afternoon off work because I was so overwhelmed with emotion that you have posted here. Wow!

I hardly know where to begin:

It makes my blood absolutely boil to learn of what has happened to you Eric, concerning the common swine you speak of: Commonweal, R. Joshua Reynolds, the Montauk Crowd, some mystery criminal group in Missoula and I suppose that’s just the short list.. It is an absolute abomination! And if what you say about what happened to Chris Carson (your friend) is true, it is also an absolute abomination!

I watched with tears streaming down my face, the recent You-tube posting of you and Chris Carson giving a talk at the SBARC Ham Radio club. At the end you describe to some degree what has happened to you. - The video is a goldmine of information for the likes of us here on this forum. You are an exceptional speaker and teacher! (Chris was also). You speak with intelligence, humour, sincerity and even with some slight anguish in your voice. - I have listened to every word uttered on that video, like 100 times or more! - I have many questions on that video but I’m not going to ask them of you at this time.


You said in your post: “So in light of all the above, why should Eric Dollard involve himself in the useless or criminal behaviour of others.” (edit) - “I have no interest in teaching anyone about Tesla except under the department of the Navy or the likes thereof”. “The door is shut”!

Sadly, I have to agree with you in light of what has happened to you in the past. Indeed it has only brought you great personal turmoil, grief & trouble.

But you ask “why should”. – Well with a tears and a lump in my throat I suggest maybe why: - You are the only teacher regarding Tesla! Period! The greatest honour you can have or offer to your fellow man is to teach. Who else concerning the subject of Tesla, and The Great White Lie, will provide the required light on the subject? (Keeping in mind all your practical experience together with the teachings of your books, works & papers both published and perhaps some unpublished). Already your paper “The Fallacy of Conductors” provides some insight into #2 in your post. Why else did you make those old Borderlands videos back in the mid 1980’s? – But to teach. -There are experimenters and scientists all around the world who will listen to you and study your works and eventually show the proof via the internet, replicated experiments; if the science of Tesla and even general Electricity were explained. (As your five books and other papers show).

Yes, you have already given us more than most. Most of your books, papers & video’s, are available on the internet for those who look. Maybe there are still some more hidden gem’s (like the SBARC Ham Radio club video) that could be released? For example the San Francisco Tesla Society - Perhaps they could post some of the presentations you gave there in past years and recently. – (Ok yes you have put one of the presentation.ppt and other recent PDF downloads on the American Marconi Foundation website). Thank you, it is all wonderful material!

My personal dream would be that you would make a series of new and up to date educational DVD’s in which you explain and cover your five papers together with other teachings including some circuits & with simple practical experiments to show the principals. – Let it all loose as it were, or perhaps provide the small seed which contains it all, reaching a world wide audience. Please don't lock the Tesla door Eric, we are not all criminals – Please teach us. - However if it means more personal grief & turmoil, then I understand why you are no longer interested in doing so. Sadly it should have never been the case.


Thank you Eric, Mr T Rex, for your post here on the Energetic Forum. (I hope it isn't the last one). If nothing else you have given us all an insight into your world and the grief & turmoil you have gone through in regard to your life & work with Tesla experiments.. Even though we probably don’t quite comprehend it all. - You have answered the original question of this post, straight from the horse’s mouth! It raises many more questions though (as always). It seems as if there is some kind of silent war that is still going on even today, in regards to energy, science and our freedom.

God Bless you Eric, all the best in all your endeavours.

With humble regards and greatest respect,
Michael from Australia.

[sucahyo]

Nice to hear your word Eric. Many thanks for the head up .

I had a young student from Korea visit me a few years back. He had no problem understanding the basic concept of producing an energy synthesizing apparatus, because his mind was uncontaminated by all of the Bedini/Bearden falsehoods.

The problem I see with Bearden theory is the suggestion to utilize voltage without current to get high COP. This itself already disproven with Bedini device which always use current with switching time slower than 4ns (assuming that mechanical switch of a slow rpm motor would never near that switching time).

It distract experimenter from the true goal.

Example of Bearden statement:

http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/120209.htm

With really very little thought and effort you can design a circuit/system that will power the "external circuit" and its loads with STATIC VOLTAGE alone, never drawing any current at all from the source. But inventors have been killed for discovering how to do that, and going about doing it. Electrical engineers would not even dream of it, because it is totally outside their model and what they are taught. They are taught erroneously that they must "draw power" from the source. Without current there is no power, yet there can easily be a continuous flow of enormous EM energy, but just with the external circuit's electrons "pinned" or frozen momentarily.

It is not easy since the high COP should only, as a factor, be attained at spesific input signal form just like shown by Gotoluc on self running coil or by Bedini at spesific output signal form. I never hear a working high COP device that use "voltage without current".

[EgmQC]

Hi Mr Dollard,

I'm happy to know that you took time to post here and ill do some deep research on what you posted, and a great thx for all what you have done in the past.

Best Regards,
EgmQC

[Raui]

My goodness, Eric Dollard (presumably!) pops into this thread and nobody follows up on what he's pointing out to you? It took me less than 5 minutes to track it all down (other than the paper in German--I'll get to that after reading the others).

Incredible...

Eric, if that really was you, let me just say a tremendous THANK YOU for that.

This was precisely what I was thinking. That chapter on Reaction Machines is a very interesting read indeed. I'm in the process now of reading through the rest of the chapters. They're quite math orientated as a whole, just a warning to those not great with maths. Thank you very much Mr Dollard.

Hi Eric,

What's your beef with Bedin and Bearden??

I think the term "Scalar Wave" came about because modern science has no decent scientific terms for "Out of the Box"...Science? lol.

Anyways, thanks for popping in.

Duane

While I can kind of see why they called it Scalar waves as we're dealing with more of a electrostatic wave and electrostatic values are often reffered to as voltage which is the magnitude without direction aka. a scalar quantitiy however it's overly confusing because it makes little logical sense for the reasons Eric posted. A better general name for these waves would be electrostatic compression waves (or longitudinal as compression and logitudinal waves are one and the same) made up of electrostatic fields rapidly alternating even this doesn't sum them up but is a better name than 'scalar waves'. In the older textbooks this field is called the dielectric field which I feel is even more appropriate, this is what Eric calls the field if I am not mistaken.

Raui

EDIT
@Shamus
I found the chapter on Reaction Machines in this book; Internet Archive: Free Download: Theory and calculation of alternating current phenomena maybe the different editions have this removed? This I believe to be the 3rd edition.

[Shamus]

Hi Jetijs,

Here are some links, basically patents and a book by Steinmetz:

MEANS FOR CONTROLLING ALTERNATING ... - Google Patent Search

DU HAMEL - Google Patent Search

Theory and calculation of ... - Google Books

If I track down the German paper I'll post directly in this thread. I've been meaning to get back to Steinmetz, but am currently slogging through Walter Russell. Happy reading!

EDIT: The Steinmetz linked above is part of a later edition that was split into three parts, and the chapter Eric talks about above is not in it. If I find an earlier edition with that chapter I'll post a link--unless someone beats me to it.

EDIT 2: The chapter in question can be found as Chapter 16 in Theory and Calculations of Electrical Apparatus. Dunno if it differs from the earlier edition, but it's probably worth a look.

[Jetijs]

Hi Shamus.
Can you post those papers for others to read?
Thank you and many thanks to Eric