Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric Dollard

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sputins
    replied
    CRD Progress & testing

    Gíday Eric,

    I hope your eye injury is healing okay.

    As far as I am aware there is only David Dawson and myself who have attempted to construct the Cosmic Ray Detector (CRD).

    My efforts are shown on its own sub-channel here:http://www.energeticforum.com/eric-d...ad.php?t=19697
    So there it follows my build progresses and includes datasheets and spectral graphs etc. Further updates to come.

    The HV DC (10Kv) section is not yet installed, however it is constructed and will be mounted in the power supply housing soon. Iím at the stage using the test fire circuit of determining the minimum amount of capacitance needed (at my 190v DC supply voltage) to trigger the 0A4G. Currently the 1uF cap isnít enough, (assuming my circuit is working correctly) but it does alter the corona slightly on the 0A4G when test button is pressed. So itís working it seems, but not quite there yet..

    Pictures show the overall setup, the power supply, the CRD main housing and circuit and the 1P40 Phototube. (The Phototube either mounted directly, or via an extension lead). Photo shows the 0A4G all a-glow, a lovely corona on it.





    Below: As I donít have the Bell Telephone ringer, Iíve committed heresy and used a double pole relay and an annoying electronic buzzer instead. - Although the silver coated terminal posts on the relay may hold up to the arcs better?



    More work and likely further modifications are needed, but this version of the CRD is close to working, hopefullyÖ

    Leave a comment:


  • 7redorbs
    replied
    part 2

    If the above were the case then would this not mean that any household battery relies on cosmic rays for the acid to peal away the moving 'electrons' of the zinc or iron? Tesla spoke specifically about radioactivity being "turned off" by the proper isolating of cosmic rays from a sample of radium? IS this possible and presumably if it were, would this be done by some electrical means, or by the deflection of cosmic rays? Cosmic ray deflector, well at least it rhymes I suppose. Maybe it would be worthwhile to build such a deflector in the case that a cosmic ray was detected at 50C with the CRD. It would certainly explain well the reason why the denser the metal then the more likely it was to interact with these Faster than light "Cosmic Rays", there are less gaps in the "diffraction grating" such FTL particles are passing thru.

    I suppose what I'm saying is, would it be possible to get two cosmic ray detectors running in tandem , to test this, both individualised to a specific cosmic ray from a specific star to obtain a delta (or distance traversed thru a straight line or curved route), a round robin, which would essentially be usable for obtaining the "real" velocity of a cosmic ray between detectors "A" and "B", with a known distance 'd' and a known period of time 't', would it be possible to obtain a velocity detected faster
    than light? Presumably now some people have listened to Eric and constructed some CRD, could this be a next step, and help tell us something about the means by which Tesla intended to develop velocities between 50 and infinite times the speed of light?

    Are we mistaken to think that Tesla claimed he could transfer power and communications "regardless of resistance distance"? resistance? Can you elaborate a little bit more about that, perhaps most of all for everyone else who might not understand why overcoming distance would be as significant as the discovery of fire, both for the transfer of intelligence and the human extension of power for an interplanetary civilisations? Did I go too far? Wasn't this what Tesla envisaged? Would appear on the front covers of 19th and 20th century newspapers with titles like "Free Energy, coming soon". What ever happened?


    Was it ever really possible? Were the coming world wars 1 and 2 an influence on why the Marconi MLFTA disappeared into RCA's hands? Do you think that it is significant that Marconi built the Tesla system, and neither the man that built it (Marconi) or the man that invented it (Tesla) had control over it post 1917. I know many times Tesla recommended that electrical inventions be in control of the government and military; because of all the
    significant over exaggeration of inventors and electricians in the day, but isn't it true the friendly government military RCA company also worked great harm into the advance of radio and wireless as a whole, for instance by obstructing FM Yankee radio, non satellite mobile-commercial communications, and the longitudinal system of Tesla? Is it fair to say that companies like Marconi, RCA and Edison Electric didn't like competition from others and tended to stamp it out - regardless of whether it was far superior or could be for the benefit of civilisation. again - did Commercial greed and human ignorance outweigh human competence, right? We've lost our Victorian engineers!

    Is this really the world we find ourselves living in? Many signs point to yes. Much practical and mathematical data has been provided by you Eric and I would like to thank you for continuing on the difficult and hazardous work of challenging the convention of the scientific religion. That of the electron, the neutron star, and dense metals - all wrong? Where did scientists go wrong?

    Concerning the problem of relativity, or should I say regarding "anti relativity". Tesla was not the only enemy of Einstein. Schroedinger and Heisenberg were causing quite a mess as well for it!

    Tesla tough, was making claims about systems which he claimed operated like quantum physicists "entangled particles". Tesla was talking about faster than light waves, before quantum physicists like Schroedinger and Heisenberg started to suggest them at Copenhagen. Where "Einstein failed to convince". Tesla was not the only one trying to defeat the tenet of light speed velocity. Apparently nearly all "modern" physicists today say "its okay for electrons to travel faster than light" and thru the dimension of time, apparently that's quite conventional for Q physics, its just been claimed that such a faster than light or instantaneous spooky action at a distance cannot carry data. Is this baloney? I believe Tesla and you would think the physicists were "marching off" performing experiment after experiment and leading themselves from one invention to another, without actually caring to be critical what it is they are treating. Even Thomson himself is a good example of this because it took Rutherford to replace the broken plumb pudding with an electron! But it didn't stop Thomson invented a vacuum tube that worked, though, right?!


    So, could it be that Tesla was so far ahead of his time that he pre-discovered a way to use quantum entanglement to achieve an infinite velocity of a travelling wave. Also, as this has been bugging me severely, is it true to say that the surface area or width of a longitudinal wave "envelope" is so infinitely small, that it's "amplitude" or "length" must be infinitely long in order to satisfy the principle of energy to mass ratio' of Einstein, that is to say if energy was locked up tight in a beam so focused and confined that, it's effective amplitude and distance resistance would have to be proportional to the width , surface area and density of the beam?


    Tesla occasionally said in his "true wireless" document when comparing his radio system to that of the Hertzian one to be "Billions of times inferior", is that because of this principle of "punching thru" by the arrangement of dimensional wave envelopes .

    As you've suggested before, is it fair to say that the wave of Nikola Tesla is something different. For instance you once mentioned that it was the "time" period of which energy was released which determined power (i.e. energy is not equivalent to power), similarly you said that it was not about the "speed" of the velocity but the proportion of energy to mass, in your old SBARC lecture, is that still relevant? Sorry for such a long letter, it has been some time that I have written to you Eric but appreciate everything you have done with the Earthquake project, it has been a real eye opener at what can be done with new types of theoretical waves, and detectors to confirm it!

    Thanks for everything you have done, and the rare privilege and pleasure of being able to put to you some of my questions, and I am glad that they are hopefully about what most excites you . the CRD. and "Ray" of Tesla.

    On a slight side note there had been some discussion elsewhere that "Tesla's X - ray " system was completely harmless, completely. Really? Do you think you can help elaborate on the difference between reflected and direct x rays?

    It is with thanks to dr-green for providing this information yesterday on another group. Is the social and commercial situation, just like you say Eric, are we really being irradiated unnecessarily not just by medical x-ray equipment but radio equipment too? Have you seen the upcoming 5G microwave telecommunications masts? Do you think it's safe? Worse or better than 3 and 4G? What about the phone emissions themselves as opposed to the masts? Presumably 4G being 100Mhz, 5G will be even greater in freq.

    It's such high frequency you can download a dvd film in a few seconds, to think its trillions of billions of bytes per second! It's literally "thousands of times faster", surely the mobile phone companies have tested the microwave emissions over the last 30 years? I fear not. But from what I understand from you and Tesla's work the world could have been a far friendlier and happier place had not human greed and ignorance created this paradise lost, and isn't it a shame too? A world at war over nothing really significant, but such things as overcoming distance resistance, is a frightening weapon of possibility is it not, just as much as it is that of peace. Perhaps you are right , transmitting power wirelessly may not be a good idea, but in the right hands surely will it not build the technology for a new Babylon? All I can say is I hope to one day see it benefit society the way tesla intended, and although all the human resistance against what it is you are doing Eric, I know it in my heart, philosophically that what you are doing is meaningful and worthwhile, and while it may not be accepted by academics today, this work of teslas and yours may bring about a change in nuclear and atomic physics to bring about very real change.

    Thank you sir for everything you are doing and all that you have endured, I have seen you experience some of it, and I can say with certainty more than numerous people like me are still here to help in any way we can to see you succeed in your endeavours of anti relativity. Lastly, and my apologies for asking so much, have you heard of the Catt Anomaly (too much electricity on a conductor and a problem finding where it comes from?) If not then I highly recommend the reading, it is very reminiscent of the things you have pointed out and if you have heard of it I would be very excited to hear your thoughts on conductors orientation to the planetary axis, I think this is how Marconi built his station, wasnt it?

    be well! All the best


    Best Wishes,
    Adam



    PS: If it would be all right and if Eric can respond to any of these questions in my letter at all, I would very much like to repost Eric's response to The Tesla Society (UK) for editorial. Would this be OK?
    Last edited by 7redorbs; 01-15-2015, 11:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • 7redorbs
    replied
    re: Cosmic Ray Detector Faster than Light & Other Controversial Contrivances

    Hi Eric,

    Thank you for all the work you have shown us all so far. Due to personal circumstances I only recently received your letter and postcard dated July 2013, thank you. I appreciated it a lot and it is my regret that I have not written to you directly in so long but as a lot has been going on and I have only just received it.

    I have come to prefer writing on paper as opposed to the internets and apologise for not writing sooner but I thought that after your previous kind and generous explanations of things in the interviews I had the rare privilege and pleasure to do with you in 2013 and 2014 that I should post some follow up questions of things that we perhaps didn't get round to fully covering last time. Although I don't think I ever mentioned it your work has really saved my life, in more than several ways, and at the very least saved me from a life of meaningless hypocrisy. I did not think I would ever be able to thank you enough, but after working on the earthquake fundraiser with Aaron and yourself it became clear to me that you really had finally managed to get a project alive again, like your previous Landers installation, and it was really working this time round, with a lab. I have for the most part the last few years been really upset by some people's reaction to your antirelativity lectures. It really had a lot more information to provide on radio than a lot of people realised or would have liked to admit. I mean if electricity travels without a velocity Eric, the discovery is mind blowing! There is a lot of theoretical physics that probably supports infinite speed of an electron! Trained physicists joke that one or two electron is "probably enough for the universe!" - if they move in an out of time! That is a cool trick, I wonder if the second law of thermal dynamics considers this sort of applications. I think not.

    For a long time I have been interested in the nomenclature of the "Ray", specifically the "Cosmic Ray" described by Tesla. Isn't it true that Tesla said that atoms themselves consisted of something more akin to "streams of rays" as opposed to particles like electrons and protons. Could it really be as you (and Tesla) suggest? Quantum physicists and relativists really lost the way - and to an avid researcher - tesla warns of this - repeatedly.

    Not only that he provided claims but those claims asserted he had not only obtained evidence, but constructed elaborate ray detectors to achieve such a thing. For instance, Tesla briefly mentions he measured the cosmic rays from Antares, more than several times, to be of a velocity which was 50C or 50 times the speed of light. As presented by Tesla such a statement seemingly disproves relativity in one fail swoop, what happened to that? really? Tesla was ignored?

    The same with Wheatstone? He constructed what seems to be a perfectly good test using a split or segmented transmission line to obtain the speed of the electrostatic discharge which he gave to be approximately 281,000 miles per second. Is Einstein and both Wheatstone incorrect if the velocity is infinite? I think often (and for a long time) people have tried (and failed) to measure electricity, physicists and electricians like Wheatstone have contrived ways to measure and predict electrons, but I am not convinced whether physicists or electricians of today understand what causes them. Tesla believed an external kinetic means caused the activity of some atoms. What are your thoughts on this Eric? For instance we know Tesla believed atomic activity were concerned with something he described as "streams" or "streams of rays", we know that radioactivity could be halted in atoms according to tesla. In the modern traditional sense we've only just started to find out about the influence that suns have on the background radioactive decay of isotopes - the results seem compelling enough to show that Tesla may have been right all along - radioactive decay could be caused by external means, such as the emissions from our local star and other stars. What are your thoughts about this Eric?

    Can the cosmic ray detector help end this speculation? I think so, but it would be nice to hear what you think about obtaining the velocity of a cosmic ray with detectors.

    For instance, When I've asked around on forums and on the internet, not many people are forthcoming with an answer, of course physicists (the enemy) always have an opinion on "FTL" - it's impossible to them - just like God - because the 2nd law of thermal dynamics needs no god to create matter, right?! What do we know really? IS it possible that matter could be created by an external force? At least according to Tesla radio activity of dense metals alpha and beta and gamma rays was being caused by external means. !!!! I believe Tesla even suggested there was something other than "matter" which seemed to give certain properties to matter, such as the emission of light or alpha beta and gamma rays.

    Well, so I'm told, "neither electrons or neutrinos" are capable of what Tesla described in a modern sense. I think the question arises, naturally, how Tesla may have measured such a velocity. But having talked with Eric in some detail about this before it has been suggested that Tesla provided no apparatus or technical detail as to detect cosmic rays. That really is a shame, but it is exciting to have had Eric and see some engineers construct! I wish more were involved.

    Another question specifically concerning the individual detecting of waves from specific stars , such as Antares, previously suggested in rare hints by Tesla. Would this alone completely disprove relativity by the obtained velocities measured? Can this be done? It is my hope that such a thing would work a long way to exonerate both your own and Tesla's claims. It seems you've probably achieved some interesting effects already which "only transmission linesman can explain" and "only transmission line deal with". Is it true to say that the explanation of electricity and it's behaviour from an linesman or engineer is very different to that of a theoretical physicist?!

    Briefly and perhaps not loudly enough I had briefly suggested previously to Mr. Dawson and others that the detection of specific rays from a specific location, such as Antares could work to measure to obtain and detect these theoretical cosmic rays, and make them "less theory". However from what I understand a single device is so far unable to provide a velocity of a cosmic ray to exceed that of light. Would two in tandem as I have described provide such a benefit of providing a velocity of the ray? Would such a possibility be obtainable?

    I have been thinking that I think it would be a learned opportunity for some enterprising people to construct several cosmic ray detectors in tandem at different points of the earth, and, each Cosmic ray detector be focused on a specific star or `individualised` to a particular ray. (that is to only detect specific ray emissions from a specific location) along with an radioactive isotope and geiger counter - is this even possible or worthwhile?

    Presumably if one is able to detect a single cosmic ray electrically with the apparatus you have so kindly provided diagrammatics for, which some people have already replicated, then with the addition of a second point of reference and cosmic ray detectors do you think it would be possible to obtain a velocity of the cosmic ray or additional novel information about the activity of our local sun and other stars? Do you think the CRD could be adapted to obtain the velocity of Marconi's MLFTA propagations?

    Eric you have mentioned before that the propagation of electricity `does not have a velocity`, in the strictest sense are you to mean that the tesla electrical system, that is to say the transmitter and receiver could in certain scenarios appear to act in tandem in some sense whereby `electrons`, or rather electricity disapears at one end, whilst electricity arrives at the other. Such a scenario was described by Einstein as a paradox, impossibly he said for instance; if one were to trigger with a switch which would cause a boxing glove to come out and hit the person just before they touched the trigger, and preventing them from reaching it to begin with, what happens? This is an interesting and compelling question, as what both you and Tesla claim distinctly is that in certain rare cases effects can be known to precede the cause. Can you elaborate on the algebraic method that you used to show this? I believe you use a 4 quadrant theory to explain such a possibility. Was einstein wrong about the paradox? What would happen in such a strange scenario that effects would precede their cause? Is this not a time machine in the grandest sense of the word , a time radio.

    In the case of the Tesla Magnifier I have been wondering was the objective to overcome distance resistance? Is this even possible? It surely would be a holy grail!


    Tesla's Wardenclyffe transmitter appears to have two wave forms, overground and underground - one is interacting with the ground of the earth and the other the ionospheric `ether`. Can you elaborate further about how Tesla might have extended the planetary grid to become an interplanetary grid? It was a bold claim and if possible really represents more than just an "Electrical stonehenge" as you called the Bolinas station which partially featured some of this Tesla technology. What is happening with Bolinas now anyway? Commonweal, greenpeace , the local municipalities, national park etc? Shouldn't this sort of site be a museum? Why does it seem that physicists, electricians and beurocrats would see this die? Is it ignorance or something more nefarious? Human stupidity, or does someone not like the idea of buildings falling down, the earth splitting in two and tanks getting blown up at a distance. heh, you'd think it was all out of a James Bond film, but waht is probably more likely, everything out of a James bond Film is straight out of Tesla's 19th and 20th century writings! right?


    I've been wondering did Tesla plan to use the earth ground as a means of instantaneous point to point transmission? From everything I've read and everything Tesla said this looks to be what Tesla was claiming. IS it really possible to move thousands or possibly millions of horsepower between locations without distance resistance existing in between?

    and is there an specific algebraic construct available for reference of this possibility. I apologise as time and money has been sparing of late that I have not been able to keep up with all of the new activity you are engaged in which I am sure no doubt is far less out of date than my own conceptions.

    Of course, if speeds were to exceed that of light then would not the potential energy would be rather phenomenal? from what I understand about nuclear physics, and from reading about Nikola Tesla's ideas in newspapers and article clippings, it becomes apparent that Tesla did not believe that radioactivity is caused internally by the arrangement of protons and electrons and neutral particles, i.e. not a function of density, but believed that something akin to an external cosmic ray caused the dense matter to become unstable . In such a case then the electron rotation of any electrolyte, and any resultant potential between any anode and cathode, could be caused by external means, which would of course be interesting because that would itself mean that the motion of all chemicals 'electrons and protons' could arbitrarily be powered by external means. Could this what Farnsworth was doing with his tubes? The possibility of a new order of inter-action perhaps as significant as Thomson and Rutherford initial findings?
    Last edited by 7redorbs; 01-15-2015, 10:04 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • t-rex
    replied
    Versors in Space

    In response to the previous post, my mathematical expressions for Versors in Space appears at the end of my paper titled "Theory of Wireless Power". Refer to this for more information. A complex product in space has four components:
    1) Scalar Product
    2) Line Product
    3) Clockwise cross-product
    4) Counter clockwise cross-product
    For complete information on my derivations of these ideas refer to the paper titled, "The Principals of the Algebra of Physics" by Alexander McFarlane.

    I will be able to see the internet for another week or so giving the rare opportunity to ask me questions.
    My main interest is the Cosmic Ray Detector.

    73 DE N6KPH

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    The discussion on displacement current made me look into Erics work on the electromagnetic energy. It left me with much questions however.

    In short Eric takes the product of the electrical and magnetic field. Normally the cross product is the poynting vector.

    Eric says the inproduct is a vector too. So when electric and magnetic flux are in the samer direction there is a longitudional vector.

    However to say that the inproduct is a vector is true in 4 dimensional versor calculation only if the scalar part of the versor is not zero. So i understand that Eric says the electric and magnetic field is a 4d versor field with a non zero scalar part. From that It might be that all the transversal and longitudional products follow that make the transversal and longitudional waves and scalair fields.

    But it is a big asumption that the electric field is a versor 4d field and it sounds like space counter space but Eric is not explicit about it.

    If he uses versors to do 3d calculations than the scalar part should be set to zero but than there is no longitudional vector product only a scalar product.

    This all has me in a loop of almost understanding and thinking this is not correct but I might miss something. After several weeks I decided to write this down maybe someone understands?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    Extracoils

    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    Excellent work Sputins, very good job of demonstrating some of the effects. Nice output too. Have you tried extra coils yet?
    Thanks for that dR Green.

    I have built a couple of extra coils, each with different wire, wire lengths, spacing or some other variable. Once I find the one Iím happy with together with its terminal capacitance, Iíll duplicate it for the second (image) or receiving coil. So the answer is yeah but only for one coil thus far, not both together at the same time at the moment. The Extra coil does add to the output. I do look forward to having the two extra coils in place. I could try two different extra coils on each coil and attempt to tune to the same frequency by adjusting the top terminal capacitance. Ė Something I could try fairly soon.

    The method of construction on the extra coils is Iíve been using half inch Teflon rod or wooden dowel as the spokes (salvaged Teflon rod, or baked wood dowel at 105C for several hours). The wire is space wound with the nearest desired diameter of fishing line. Then the windings, wire and fishing line against the Teflon or wood are painted with several coats of polyurethane. Once dry the fishing line is carefully removed and the wire holds its position, (hopefully, most of the time).

    Hereís a little discovery tip: On some other trial builds the use of a white or clear ĎSilicon Tapeí is used between the spokes and the wire. This silicon tape acts as a nice Ďroadbedí for the wire. As it has some springiness, spongy quality to it, as well as a good insulator. It provides some tension and helps hold the wire in its location when space wound, polyurethane is then not required, neither is cutting slots Ė Likely this is the standard method Iíll use in future.


    As push-pull transmitters are difficult to impedance match (Pi-networks not recommended or used for push pull). Iíve also been working on an add-on module for my existing single ended transmitter, as I have an 833a tube and its filament transformer to extract out of an old sparking VTTC I made years ago.. Then I can use a beefed up Pi-network to Z match.

    This and some sort of modulation would be nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by Sputins View Post
    Excellent work Sputins, very good job of demonstrating some of the effects. Nice output too. Have you tried extra coils yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    Originally posted by jpolakow View Post
    Hello All,

    First my apologies for being absent here. I have had quite a number of things pop up in my personal life that have completely overwhelmed me and taken up all my time, including a prolonged legal defense and some very unfortunate family news. I will give a more thorough review of what I have been up to at a later date, as I am still busy trying to get caught up in my life.

    Nonetheless, I am now publishing the work Eric gave me in November regarding Inductance and Capacitance. It took some time to publish because I had to learn how to use latex in order to present the formulas properly. Thus below is the beginning of the work on inductance and capacitance. As per Eric's instructions, I will make one post per week of the material. Without further delay...
    Good to hear from you John.

    Wish you all the best in sorting out your personal business and confronting the unfortunate family matters. - September/October/November 2014, I went through my own trials and tribulation period. It can be very difficult and wear you down physically and mentally. The things youíd rather be doing of course suffer.

    Just as well you have a tenacious spirit. You will prevail eventually.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    image hosting

    Originally posted by Marcus Neuhof View Post
    John,
    Thank you very much for your efforts and sorry to hear about your troubles. If it's convenient for you, consider posting a PDF as an attachment and/or hosting the files somewhere besides Photobucket. (I believe LaTeX makes generating PDFs fairly straightforward, but that may of course not be true for your situation.)

    There are posts in the Dollard forum archives which have been rendered more or less useless, already, because the person depended on a 3rd party image hosting service which has since deleted the images (or shut down entirely).

    It would be terrible to have Eric's and your hard work lost to history in a few months or years because of this phenomenon.
    @John P - if you put the images into your own blog site and put them here, they won't disappear. I can also setup a ftp account for you to upload images here on the Energetic Forum server.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marcus Neuhof
    replied
    John,
    Thank you very much for your efforts and sorry to hear about your troubles. If it's convenient for you, consider posting a PDF as an attachment and/or hosting the files somewhere besides Photobucket. (I believe LaTeX makes generating PDFs fairly straightforward, but that may of course not be true for your situation.)

    There are posts in the Dollard forum archives which have been rendered more or less useless, already, because the person depended on a 3rd party image hosting service which has since deleted the images (or shut down entirely).

    It would be terrible to have Eric's and your hard work lost to history in a few months or years because of this phenomenon.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpolakow
    replied







    Leave a comment:


  • jpolakow
    replied
    Hello All,

    First my apologies for being absent here. I have had quite a number of things pop up in my personal life that have completely overwhelmed me and taken up all my time, including a prolonged legal defense and some very unfortunate family news. I will give a more thorough review of what I have been up to at a later date, as I am still busy trying to get caught up in my life.

    Nonetheless, I am now publishing the work Eric gave me in November regarding Inductance and Capacitance. It took some time to publish because I had to learn how to use latex in order to present the formulas properly. Thus below is the beginning of the work on inductance and capacitance. As per Eric's instructions, I will make one post per week of the material. Without further delay...

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    mag amp

    David,

    Were those posted in this forum at an earlier time? If not, where did you get those?

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    Magnetic Amplifier

    From Eric Dollard to John Polakowski:

    Magnetic Amplifier:
    As this was intended for display at this Forum is presented here:

    Mag Amp - Eric Dollard to John Polakowski:

















    I have not built this device as yet as am too busy elsewhere but is on the list to be included for the CSI.

    John,
    If you are still here would like to know how you are doing and what projects you are currently working on?
    Thanks.

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    Tesla 2.0

    TESLA 2.0 VIDEO IS BACK - We have received literally hundreds of emails about the Eric Dollard interview video on YouTube going private. Before that happened, there were literally thousands of views. Eric Dollard exposed a few people in that interview and they retaliated so the producers of that video, Union Features, made it private but re-uploaded an edited version here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5fPR7Jc9u4

    Even if you already saw the video, please go to that link and give it a LIKE to support Eric Dollard.

    DOWNLOAD THE UNCUT VERSION HERE: Quite a few people downloaded the original and they're already uploading it to multiple places to preserve the uncut version. Click the following link, click the button that says Download This File, enter the captcha code and hit the button and it will download in a zip file. In the zip file is a high resolution mp4 of the entire uncut interview - there is no Copyright notice in the video but that doesn't mean it isn't copyrighted - check with Union Features if you have any questions: http://www.filedropper.com/tesla20mp4

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X