This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Time Machine switch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mario
    replied
    Thanks, it'd be great if you could manage to add the recording to the site you'll be giving the link to and send an email with the link, so the ones that subscribed but can't make it will still have a chance.

    cheers,
    Mario

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    recorded call

    I'll ask but there are no plans to record it at this time - we may just do another live call but it is difficult to schedule these high caliber presenters.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mario
    replied
    Aaron, is there a chance of getting an mp3? This will be 4am in central Europe... I have a dayjob

    thanks,
    Mario

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    31 Hours Left!

    31 Hours Left!

    7pm Pacific Time Zone
    8pm Mountain Time
    9pm Central Time
    10pm Eastern Time Zone

    -----------------------------------

    Only the battery secret will be given away.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    time machine switch

    Originally posted by jerdee View Post
    Observations here:

    1. The Bedini TS diagram shown at the top of this thread is nothing more than an impedance matching network between the split potentials.

    2. The load is obviously apart of the circuit and controls the impedance match process! So when Aaron states that he will not show the load, you are MISSING half the circuit!

    3. The batteries must all be conditioned and working at very similar conditions of charge and discharge to work in this system. Otherwise impedance will not match across split positive network when batteries are rotated.

    4. The lower the impedance of the matching network, the more can be extracted across the low impedance inductive load. Yes this load must be inductive!!!

    5. Mechanical switching is best, to produce instant potential differences across load. Just like how the sharper the delta is for switching is much more efficient for longitudinal resonance of open coil! Much greater gains! If done with switches, keep them extremely low in impedance. Beta match and parallel them!

    6. Splitting the negative will give you greater gains as Bedini has told us that for a long time now. As well as bigger differentials of potential.

    These are just a few things that I have observed! Please let me know if I'm far off!

    Jeremy.
    Hi Jeremy,

    The only thing I'll comment on at this point is #2. Without the load, it should be overwhelmingly obvious where to place the load. It is more of the concept that I want to show so that everyone will be able to see it and apply it in COUNTLESS different variations. I don't want anyone to get stuck on it having to be the circuit I'm showing. The circuit I'm going to show is probably the simplest variation that anyone ever has shown of this particular method - a VERY EASY to follow circuit concept.

    Also, I mentioned that I'm not sure I'm sharing this yet. The battery secret for sure but this, I'm leaning towards a no on the time machine switch at this time and the battery secret is something way more practical at this point.

    Leave a comment:


  • jerdee
    replied
    Impedance Matching

    Observations here:

    1. The Bedini TS diagram shown at the top of this thread is nothing more than an impedance matching network between the split potentials.

    2. The load is obviously apart of the circuit and controls the impedance match process! So when Aaron states that he will not show the load, you are MISSING half the circuit!

    3. The batteries must all be conditioned and working at very similar conditions of charge and discharge to work in this system. Otherwise impedance will not match across split positive network when batteries are rotated.

    4. The lower the impedance of the matching network, the more can be extracted across the low impedance inductive load. Yes this load must be inductive!!!

    5. Mechanical switching is best, to produce instant potential differences across load. Just like how the sharper the delta is for switching is much more efficient for longitudinal resonance of open coil! Much greater gains! If done with switches, keep them extremely low in impedance. Beta match and parallel them!

    6. Splitting the negative will give you greater gains as Bedini has told us that for a long time now. As well as bigger differentials of potential.

    These are just a few things that I have observed! Please let me know if I'm far off!

    Jeremy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    I looked at the dates, I defendantly will miss it. Will there be way to follow up?


    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    switch

    Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
    I believe this patent is where all of the Tesla Switch related material started from, no matter what fables have come about.
    I think I originally posted it here in the Baldinelli thread or even before.

    But I came across it quite a while back.

    My switch is not exactly that but is remote related.

    I'm going to definitely give out my battery "secret" but not so sure about
    the time machine switch, yet at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    The simple switch is actually similar in concept. Are all 4 of those caps? Do you know what the origin of this concept is?
    The diagram just represents the idea and the flow of the power. I have one I am using batteries for and another in the works that uses caps and one power source. As far as the concept goes I first built it as a motor in which the motor would trigger the switching based on whether or not I wanted a push or a pull out a the coil. I just decided to run it as transformer and see what the AC across the transformer would do. Its a really efficient switch, one the best I have used.

    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    You say for cold current it takes a different configuration - what do you think that configuration would look like?
    You would want to switch one of the input coils around from an input to an output (Look at the diagram you'll see what I mean), so both primary turns flow in the same direction. The output would need to be several hundred turns more than the primaries and you would want to only grab the negative half of the wave on the output wire.

    Originally posted by Aaron View Post

    That is similar - I believe that is where Hob got his ideas for some circuits he posted in relation to the Tesla Switch.
    I believe this patent is where all of the Tesla Switch related material started from, no matter what fables have come about.

    Sorry for not getting back sooner, I have been outa town for the week working. With no internet.

    I hope I am in town when you have this thing.

    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • minoly
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Hi Patrick,

    The event is free - the book is a free download - link will be given at end of event.
    Cool - Thanks!

    Patrick

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    it's free

    Originally posted by minoly View Post
    Hi Aaron,
    you mention above that "registration is free"
    and on the event count down page
    you note that a book will be given as a thank you for our interest.
    I see no cost associated with this event yet.
    will there be one (cost to us $$'s)?
    respectfully,
    Patrick
    Hi Patrick,

    The event is free - the book is a free download - link will be given at end of event.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    @uusedman

    Originally posted by uusedman View Post
    Hi Aaron,

    I have attached a schematic of what I talking about.

    Peace and Love.
    Ok, I see - yes, mine is very different - it is a switch.

    Leave a comment:


  • minoly
    replied
    Originally posted by uusedman View Post
    Hi Aaron,

    After knowing about the 2 positive battery setup, I started experimenting and came up with 2 negative setup. However, all it did is drain batteries on both sides of the setup. I had this video up for a while demonstrating the 2 negative terminals lighting a bulb: ‪Tesla Switch negative potential 1-1‬‏ - YouTube

    Should I go back and look more deeply into this 2 negative setup?

    peace and love
    you have to play with it a bit more than that. the batteries, as usual, are very important as well as the load. JB talks about it quite a bit in one of the Tesla switch threads. can't remember the title of that thread. Maybe someone else here does. I think it's the one that John Koorn, Steve, Bit's as well as others played a big role in developing.

    Leave a comment:


  • minoly
    replied
    Hi Aaron,
    you mention above that "registration is free"
    and on the event count down page
    you note that a book will be given as a thank you for our interest.
    I see no cost associated with this event yet.
    will there be one (cost to us $$'s)?
    respectfully,
    Patrick

    Leave a comment:


  • uusedman
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Hi uusedman,

    It is quite a bit different. I'd have to see the whole schematic to know for sure.

    For sure, everyone will get the battery secret (not as fun), but is something I think everyone should know about - after the webinar or call - it will be in a document everyone can download. Not sure if I'll share this switching method yet, not too related except for the relationship to time.
    Hi Aaron,

    I have attached a schematic of what I talking about.

    Peace and Love.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X