Bashar Free Energy Space-Time Antenna Replication

[morpher44]

really good PHI video

Phi VBM Tori Array - YouTube

[morpher44]

thoughts: magnetomer versus Lorentz-o

I've been trying to reason out this cone-shaped,
interpenetrating cone thing and have come to TWO
experiments to add to my TODO list:

Lorentz-O
----------
Stan Deyo has a nice anti-gravity lecture and during this
multi-part lecture mentions Lorentz-O.
To get a spinning electro-magnetic vortex, one way would
be to have a ferromagnetic ring with a NOTCH cut in it.
Wrap a coil around this, PULSE it with DC, and
a spinning field develops because the shape is very much
like a horse shoe magnet, with a North face and a South face
at the notch location on the ring. The pulse are just
raising and lowering the intensity. Do this on a periodic basis,
and like pushing a child on a swing, you can keep the spin
going with low energy input.
This approach would argue that the Bashar coil should be wound
such that the down-going cone and the up-going cone have
wiring in the "SAME" spin direction. No bucking fields .. just
an attempt to inductively couple with a spinning field -- the vortex
created using this Lorentz-O approach.

OR ... another idea....

Magnetometer-Like Approach
----------------------------
Suppose instead the two cone shaped coils are wound around their
circumference such that when one is upside-down and put into
the other, the wiring sees currents flowing in the "opposite" direction.
I've been reading up and studying fluxgate magnetometers.
You actually need more coil winding here. You need the
"excitation" coil that is pulsed with LOW-FREQUENCY AC or DC pulses,
and you need the "sensing" coil that is used to observe the
echo pulses coming back when the coil is placed in the presence
of a magnetic field.
Normally magnetometers use ferromagnetic material, but this
approach can be utilized for more "subtle" magnetic fields using
air coils (I speculate).
So if the BASHAR STA was wound bifilar on both cones,
and wired such that you have opposite turn directions when the
coil is constructed, the "excitation" coil can be pulsed with low-frequency,
say 100hz or so, pulses, low power. The "sensing coil" would
give an ECHO pulse that is proportional too the magnetic field seen
by the coil at various orientations. Putting the coil in alignment with
the down-ward slanting magnetic field line is likely ideal if you
are trying to TAP that.
Now for the tricky part though.
The equations for fluxgate magnetometers have not yet fully been
worked out, I don't think. These are devices that have many
variables, the geometry, the materials, the number of turns,
the magnetic fields involved, the current going thru, the mutual-induction
in the device, etc.
Using this fluxgate approach for power-generation is an area of research
not yet investigated -- in the public domain -- for some reason.
I find that odd.

Conclusion
----------
I'm starting to lean towards magnetometer, magnetic resonance, etc.
as a viable approach for many of these devices.
The Lorentz-O Stan Deyo idea is also interesting, but there appear
to be things about this that Mr. Deyo didn't pass along, and it
just seems a bit more complicated.

I hope some of you experimenters out there might think about
these ideas with respect to things you might want to try.

[Tishatang]

d3x0r
Great find, thanks for posting. I thought this was common knowledge that the magnetic fields of a bar magnet circled back to the bloc wall in the middle. I believe it was Howard Johnson who plotted the magnetic field point by point years ago? There was a video about it I saw maybe ten years ago.

Anyway this video takes it into the real world with these bowel shaped magnets. He does not explain the polarity of the bowel. One cannot have unipolar magnets. When one is North for example, is the inner part of the bowel South?

Is the shape of the bowel a hemisphere or a parabola? I suspect the curve maybe be that of a rope or chain hanging between two points? There is a name for this curve that I do not recall. Gravity is pointing straight down at any point on the curve. If you have the reverse magnetic polarity coming up from the bottom, than the direct opposing force would create the flat plane center of the galaxy.

As I recall, the curve of a chain hanging can be generated by putting a mark on the edge of a circle. You roll the circle on a flat plane and you plot the points of the mark on the background plane as you roll the circle. I hope this is correct? It's been a long time since I read this.

Winding a coil in this shape would be a lot more complicated than on a conical form. But the video hints the Bashar coil would work whether or not the points come together or are interlaced. You would just get different effects?

[d3x0r]

Bashar conical fields

I recently saw this guy David LaPoint on youtube. He's got a theory about bowl-shaped magnetic fields. Two intersecting conical coils also resemble this magnetic field.

Primer Fields Part 1

It's a very intersting behavior that these bowl shaped magnetic fields exhibit. A bowl with a hole in the bottom is also a deformed torus.

[Tishatang]

morpher44
look what I found: Double vortex image

Lucas – The Invert Vortex From 21 December 2012 – Starting The New – 27 January 2013 | Lucas 2012 Infos

[Tishatang]

morpher44
I have some thoughts: First, I assumed magnetic fields important. But, as I read thread, cosmic or tachyon particles supposed to be source? If true, perhaps aim axis of coils at center of galaxy. The three stars forming belt of Orion constellation; related to three great pyramids alignment.

You are right stretching coils out in phi ratio. Here is image of vortex of water at around 5 min mark this video.

Nature Was My Teacher - The Vision Of Viktor Schauberger (part 2 of 4) - YouTube

Walter Russell had the two spirals coming to a point facing each other. Bashar coil more correct they interlace a little; maybe about 1/3 the length. This is discussed in the extensive writings of David Wilcock where he discusses error of Russell. He also discusses the reason for quantization of energy you observed. Its been a long time since I read this, maybe I can find link?

The extra space between coils makes it easier to interlace them. As I looked at the threads of a wood screw to represent the coils, where they interlace, they cross each other at right angles more or less. When the wires cross at right angles, these junctions cancel each other magnetic fields. This creates or receives scalar (tachyon?) energy. This is secret of caduceus coil and, I think, Henderson basket weave coils. Between the pegs, wires are crossing at right angles.

You want the electricity flowing in one direction. So, when it is returning, it is going the opposite direction to cancel the fields to create the scalar interface. Usually, this means the two coils of Bashar would be wired in series?

It might be in your experiments, you hit the right combo and a large amount of energy comes pouring in. I suggest a big knife switch or emergency cutoff.

Victor Schauberger referenced in above video, discovered that air vortexes above a certain speed are self sustaining. He invented the German flying saucer by spinning the air vortex generators to maybe 60,000 rpm. When they installed the special high speed motor, it took off and went right thru the roof of the lab!

Just food for thought.

[morpher44]

response to Tishatang

Morpher44
If you are at the South Pole looking down, the natural flow is CW. It seems opposite, but is not. If you were on the moon looking at earth, both vortexes turning together, same direction.
Place your coils with CCW on top if you are in Northern hemisphere. Maybe with axis in alignment with declination of magnetic lines of force according your latitude? Or, have setup on gimbals to rotate axis to magnetic lines of force?
Hope this helps?
tishatang

Tishatang,
Yes this does help. Thanks.
I was thinking I should figure that vector out exactly in my
"lab/bathroom", and hang a little vector model from a string
and orient it to help me remember the exact declination, etc.
I wonder if its possible to get one of those compasses in a sphere
they make for automobiles and observe which way it TIPs.

This helps: Earth's Magnetic Field Calculators - Instructions | ngdc.noaa.gov

[morpher44]

moon does rotate.

The moon does not rotate.
Nick_Z

Does the Moon Rotate?

[morpher44]

27 windings...

I've decided to solder at 27 windings for both LOOP7 coil and LOOP6
coil.

Tonight I tried various things and I've found a hook-up situation
that is now yielding greater than 200mVAC peak-to-peak
on my scope with an Earth Ground connection to one side
of the hand-made inner capacitor of the cone.
Btw, I did manage to measure that capacitance and it was reading
about 5.5nF. My meter was just haywire the other day.
That measurement sounds pretty good and is near the 7.8nF
of Hendershot's handmade cap. His cap was much more foil --
more surface area. People have attempt to make his capacitor
and measured up in the 20 nano-farad range...

The circuit is simple. One plate is connected to Earth Ground.
Other plate left floating.
LOOP7 bottom lead connected to ground of scope probe.
LOOP7 upper is wired to bottom of LOOP6.
LOOP6 coil upper is wired to scope probe.

Hence LOOP7 and LOOP6 are connected in series.
Remember that these two each self resonate at a PHI ratio
from each other -- per the windings and location on the coil which
has a PHI ratio AREA for the circle.
Further, they have a mutual-induction relationship that is
transformer in nature. Lastly they share a hidden capacitor
in the Wizard hat, being brushed gently by the Lenz's Law
oscillating magnetic fields.

On my scope I see the "unpowered" oscillation "passively"
heterodyning like I hoped, with a BOOSTED gain in the peek-to-peek
voltage. 200mVolts is a pretty decent voltage. Possibly enough
to move a magnet .. per the Hendershot Fuelless Generator.
For moving a magnet, the current is the important consideration.
If you could wind a coil with at say 5 ohms, but many many
turns, then you could send 40mA peak-to-peek to the coil
from this Wizard hat.

The Wizard hat may do better if it had line-of-site to the sky
and wasn't in my house.

More studying and experiments to perform, but I wanted to pass
along these results, which is just 2 coils on the Wizard hat former.

[morpher44]

Wizard Hat Coil - Phi Coil Data to share

This coil I'm working on that uses the PHI ratios in a very fractal way
all around the design, I've decided I'm going to call the
"Wizard Hat Coil". It looks like a Wizard Hat, with strange PHI
ratio separated basket weave coils on it.

I have some data to share.
I wound LOOP 7, the Hydrogen Line diameter, and determined the 27
winds was the correct number to tune exactly the lower frequency
derived using
f(low) = Hydrogen Line Freq / (PHI^15)

Today I got a bit of time and wound LOOP 6. I realized to tune this coil,
the LOOP 7 coil can either be shorted or unshorted, since it is likely
to have a mutual-inductive response to the LOOP6 coil.

See attached. As predicted, the shorted and un-shorted measurements
are different. They cross and cross again above and below the 27th
winding. I'm not sure if I should use 27 winds though, because
I want this coil to actually be self-resonant at 1.684944Mhz.
I need to think about this and decide which winding number is right --
i.e. 27 or a bit more to go to 1.684944Mhz. Opinions?
This is getting interesting.

I realized that my pulse generator only goes as high as 2Mhz,
and my next coil up is to be 2.73Mhz. Hence, LOOP6 was the last
one I can calibrate using this signal generator technique.
My scope can go up to 60Mhz. It may be possible for me to
pulse one of the lower coils in the cone at each frequency and
then see on the scope which winding gives the highest voltage.
If that doesn't work, tuning the other loops may be a challenge.

[Tishatang]

Actually the moon does rotate, exactly once every month. It all depends on perspective. From earth, it does not seem to rotate. If you were on Mars, you would see it slowly rotate as it goes around the earth. You would see all of the moon once a month.

NASA is a big censorship disinfo puppet. We have a giant planet bigger than Jupiter orbiting our sun the last ten years. Link here:

"PLANET EARTH - HOUSE OF THE RISING SUNS" - PART 5 OF 5 - HD SWEET! - YouTube

They have since erased this planet if you download the dates shown in this video. But, it is real, I checked the NASA site when this video came out. When I went back later, it was whitewashed away.

Comets are not dirty little snowballs. One, twice the size of Jupiter went flying through our solar system about ten years ago? See lecture Nassim Haramein.

(PART 1) Nassim Haramein at the Rogue Valley Metaphysical Library. 2003. (4 HRS) - YouTube

I had a small clip of this in his long lecture. But, it is not on my channel anymore. YT took it off my channel???? Censorship abounds in this world of lies and disinfo. Change is coming soon.

[Nick_Z]

If you were in the southern part of the world, and flushed a toilet, the water goes down in an opposite direction. This is NOT an illusion, as the vortex energy of the planet is what makes that happen, in an opposite direction.
What if, the two coils don't have to "buck".

If we are to tap this planet's vortex as an energy source we need to understand it, and to work with it, as was mentioned by Tesla and others.
I don't recall him ever mentioning anything about "bucking coils". Yes, No?
If you spin a gyroscope very fast it would never get off the ground, but if you were to spin two gyros in opposite directions, together they may overcome Earth's gravity. But, a mechanical device may not be able to spin fast enough to do this.
Why is it that most UFOs seen are round, oval or saucer shaped? Could this be a clue...

The moon does not rotate. Which makes some of us wonder if our moon is not something other than a normal moon, possibly an artificial moon of sorts, brought here for a special purpose, long ago.
We'll find out more about our moon soon, as there are bases, mining, and and space crafts seen flying and landing on it. As possibly even air to breath. And the NASA is not letting us know anything about it, only that they have not been back in 40 years. Right!?!

Nick_Z

[Tishatang]

Morpher44
I just happened to glance at this thread. Yes, you are right, both coils turn together, not bucking one another. If you are standing on the North Pole looking down, the natural flow is CCW.

If you are at the South Pole looking down, the natural flow is CW. It seems opposite, but is not. If you were on the moon looking at earth, both vortexes turning together, same direction.

Place your coils with CCW on top if you are in Northern hemisphere. Maybe with axis in alignment with declination of magnetic lines of force according your latitude? Or, have setup on gimbals to rotate axis to magnetic lines of force?

Hope this helps?

tishatang

[morpher44]

internal ramp theory

OMG. I had watched this video about one month ago and was
impressed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTgxGJfXRQ0

Today I just noticed it again and was STRUCK by how similar
the internal ramp idea is to the coil I'm building. The internal ramp
spiral up the pyramid looks like it maintaining the PHI ratio.
I bet you it is. If this is so, the ramp could house wiring and do
the same exact thing that I'm trying to replicate. I.e. the notion
of heterodyning PHI frequency for largest possible gain -- done
"passively".
Synchronicity?

[morpher44]

Bashar Cone Former

I will be posting my replication soon enough, keep up the good work!
Warren

I'm curious how you are going to do the cone shaped former.
Some people have tried to make tower structure from long dowels,
and then wound around the tower structure. I just used poster board
and made a cone that was flimsy. I stuff it full of cloth to make it
more ridged while winding, then removed the cloth.
There is also the copper PIPE in a spiral approach.

Also, if you watch one of the Bashar videos when he describes the spiral,
he starts from the base and does a CCW spiral to the apex, and
then connects to the down-going cone base, and does that same
CCW motion down to its apex. MEANING, that the spirals are
spinning in the SAME direction to augment each other rather
than to FIGHT each other. That choice is probably important.
I thought it didn't matter when I made my big coil, but after
thinking about this a little harder, I think it does probably matter.
You want the vortex fields to be spinning so that both coils
benefit.

If you use a poster-board former, the math need to impose
a PHI spiral onto a 102 degree WEDGE shaped former before
it is made into a cone would be a bit tricky. This is an interesting
computer graphics problem -- or math problem. It occurred to
me that one way of winding would be to follow that spiral
exactly. You might even be able to tape the wire down in loop
segments that you then have to solder together when bringing
the two sides together into the cone shape. This would be
tricky, but an interesting experiment as well.