Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suppression document and YouTube

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    80-90% efficient solar cell technology:
    Caltech Researchers Create Highly Absorbing, Flexible Solar Cells with Silicon Wire Arrays - Caltech Media Relations
    At bottom you can see it is "supported" by BP.
    That was sent to me a few days ago.

    Not that we will have a chance to buy these for our homes
    anytime soon!

    And this 80-90% efficient solar cell technology was developed
    25 or so years ago:
    Alvin Marks - Lepcon& Lumeloid -- 90% efficient solar-electric power conversion -- articeles & patents
    Aaron that's unbelievable I thought Boeing had the monopoly..at 39%
    Boeing Plans Large-Scale Production of 39.2 Percent Efficient Photovoltaic Cells | Solar Power

    Jib, that's EXACTLY where it has to START. EXACTLY There have been many civil rights groups and activist groups for other issues never ours, so the bit of pioneering that your doing is essential

    Comment


    • #17
      Hehehe imo its not "pioneering" m8, it's more about "History"... although nowadays it's somewhat "radical" to even suggest what was commonplace 30 years ago.

      It's really simply REMEMBERING that we once were highly successful in changing things for the better...

      So we understand and realize that we can be successful again in the future too. I cannot stress enough how important this is for us.

      Nothing is "given", no aliens will come along and save us... the criminals will not suddenly change their stripes.... and things won't ever change regarding Energy without the back-pressure from below that makes it change.

      There is one way to get a corrupt government official "do the right thing":

      Make it more uncomfortable for them NOT to act, than to act. Its called Brinkmanship, and it's the only way the People will have their wishes heard. We need to learn that again.

      Talking about the "NWO" as the over-arching conspiracy behind everything is not especially useful: For one thing, it gives the impression there is a monolithic gigantic wall that we could never breach... that it is "hopeless".

      That is simply wrong. This political system we live in is really quite fragile: It relies on TRUST of the government and media to even exist. When this trust is eroded in enough people's minds.. its all over for the criminals except the Trials and Sentencing Appearances.

      Comment


      • #18
        There will always be a conflict of interest and no informed consent UNTIL..
        There is an institute specific for policing this which is evidence based, independent and no aligned - NO PROFIT service
        hang on that's what your non profit org is setting out to do

        Like Aaron each time you post you might be surprised later on how it helps and we can use it

        Thanks Jib

        Ash

        Comment


        • #19
          Another new vid from Craig Brown of Free Energy Truth: Very nice work, Craig!

          YouTube - Free Energy World - Get Ready For The Changes!

          Comment


          • #20
            Good video!

            Jeanne Manning gave a speech at the conference the other week in Coeur d'Alene. She asked the question "How will free energy change the future?". She opened it up for a few people to come up and answer. 1 out of about 10 people actually answered the questioned and he was pretty motivated about the future and our efforts to change it.
            The rest used there opportunity to advertise there business. Hijack Advertising if you will.
            One thing that has also got to change with the opportunity to employ free energy is the mindset that generally all people are consumers. People need to be encouraged fight that mold as often as possible and resist anyone who forces it upon them.

            Cheers
            Matt

            Comment


            • #21
              Very interesting Matthew. i am really sorry i could not attend, i very much respect the work of Jeanne Manning, and many of the other folks there

              Anyone who accuses this genre of "socialism" is dead wrong... there's plenty of self-interest and "capitalistic" activity going on lol.

              __________________

              I would ask you all to consider signing this Petition on Saving the Internet. the lastest set of Laws in the Senate, would give them draconian powers to shut down ENTIRE ISP's just because they feel like it, with no legal recourse, and simply because some scum bag lawyer made an UNSUBSTANTIATED claim about intellectual property. Recently (within the last 2 days), the US gov shut down over 76 sites... PROVING they have enough laws to get REAL lawbreakers NOW as it is.

              Intellectual Property is the MOST subjective and controversial part of all Business Law (similar to Patent Infringement Laws)... So to combat it, they make the most draconian laws, with the least recourse for falsely accused victims, EVER SEEN? That makes no sense at all. They are essentially INVITATIONS for corporate shysters to steal other powerless people's property; and will put a huge scare into anyone who runs an internet business.

              So why these next set of laws then...? They are NOT about intellectual property, they are about CENSORSHIP and ending dissent. And they shred and trash the US Constitution, creating a dangerous Precedent. It is almost UNBELIEVABLE that the Senate would even consider it, but they are.

              Please spread this; its important.

              Stop the Internet Blacklist! | Demand Progress

              Comment


              • #22
                OpEdNews - Article: There is Something Wrong with the Independent Media

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thats kind of "No Duh!!" story. We all should know that it is that way,and its getting worse. He does point some good examples.

                  Matt

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Thanks Mathew (and yes i agree these things should be more widely understood, but unfortunately it would appear they are not).

                    I wrote that article because at that "OpEd News", less than 1% of arts. are about the BP Gulf Disaster.... and probably 0.1% are about alternative energy (even including "conventionals")... and only one buried and ignored art. (and that was only a link) even mentioned the Fed's release of data regarding who they gave the bail out money to:

                    And make no mistake, that is a MAJOR story damaging to the banks and Fed that is being heavily suppressed.... even apparently in the so-called alternative media too. That general story could eventually put Bernanke and several trans-national bank executives in prison (lol fat chance, but you never know).

                    I sent in my own "link" story on it there to OpEd News last week, and it got completely buried, it never even showed up on the main front page (which is something that they would have to do "manually" and deliberately, other wise it would be visible on the main page for at least a little while, because the que is based on "time" they were submitted).

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Oh I didn't realize you wrote it. I thought is was just a good article you were pointing too.

                      Very good job brother.

                      Matt

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hi jibbguy, have you tried sending it in to "Before It's News"? I believe they accept articles from anybody. At least some of the stuff they have on their site is pretty far out and some seems to be from real people trying to get other people to see the danger in what is going on in our country. You might give them a try. I read most of the articles with a somewhat skeptical mind, but I have also gotten some pretty good info from there on occasion.

                        Carroll
                        Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          @Jibbguy

                          Hey just wanted to mention I gave it to my Mother, she's big on research in this similar subject matter. She really liked the article as well. She said your great writer.

                          She want to know if she finds a place to post it is OK. A link or something?
                          Just to spread it a bit. I didn't think you would mind but I figure I should ask.

                          Cheers
                          Matt

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Thanks, Matthew (and thanks for the suggestion citfta i will check it out),

                            Yes its OK to publish it other places once the "48 Hours Exclusivity" at OEN wears out (tonight about 11 pm i think).

                            Other than that it is "open source" hehehe

                            I choose that place to publish first, as it is probably "the best of a bad lot" lol regarding the personal opinions of editors towards "free energy" and other "radical" subjects, and it has a quite large semi-mainstream readership that includes many members of Congress and/or their staff. Rob Kall there is a "good guy", but i really have no idea what constraints he is put under to be allowed to operate at all... but i am willing to bet, that there are "constraints"... for ALL of the major sites.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Guys what about a Wiki leaks sector of this stuff?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Assange says that one of his major rules is the material can't be "self-produced"... so it must come from some government or corporate source

                                Wikileaks claims it is now holding some very damaging stuff on "BP", in case Assange is killed or put in prison.

                                Is it the shelving of more efficient solar panels, or a memo on how they must suppress them? Maybe some other free energy device they shelved?

                                Or is it a "smoking gun memo" ordering Obama around on how to handle the Gulf Disaster?

                                Interesting to speculate on. We should all write him and urge him to release it now anyway; they've probably got enough other stuff in "reserve" (they also claim to have something really bad on Bank of America)... But we REALLY NEED to get some hard evidence on BP right now.

                                _______________________________

                                THIS STORY IS VERY IMPORTANT TOO: But it is being totally ignored, and censured not only in the mainstream media, but even by the so-called "independent media"... Why? Because, it can eventually put Bernanke and his buddies IN PRISON for Fraud, lying to Congress, and several other things including Anti-Trust act

                                Lol, it is pretty funny in one respect: They corrupted, co-opted, or intimidated into silence 99 out of 100 US Senators... but that last ONE can sink them all

                                Socialism for the Rich - Newsroom: U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (Vermont)
                                Last edited by jibbguy; 12-08-2010, 03:36 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X