gravity waves found

[Jetijs]

David, I tried to contact Matt, my emails don't get through. Can't get him. Can you email him my shipping address? You know it.
Thanks,
Jetijs

[gravityblock]

The inside of the sphere is equal to one. draw a circle....imagine 99999s with their tails sticking through with a 0 on the outside ...with a value of 1....a FULL sphere ..EVERY WHERE BUT 2 POINTS....do the calculations again .... But yet, every quarter is equal to one.

Can you draw this out? I'm trying to visualize this, but I'm having a hard time. Would it be similiar to this video of a ferrofluid in a rotating field, if the 9's were overlayed above and below each other to form a full sphere (1min. 20sec. in the video)?

Thanks,

GB

[david lambright]

.7129 and .6105195

YouTube - Experiment on Fluid Motion this video shows the 4 components of a di-pole magnetic field..... the one main and 3 reflections.....the reflection of the beam puts it out of phase with the main beam this is what permanent magnetism is.....the reflected beam does not shift....the mechanics of it are this;...infinite ray is reflected.no phase shift....reflected ray is split and shifts....this produces the attractive and repulsive force....a laser uses these principles ...this infinite beam or ray, i will show, makes all of the forces... Eienstien equation, E-mc2, shows this form exactly.....this also explains why i felt a pulling/pushing when i used mirrors in my experiments... . Gibbs (free energy) questions in this article, they talk about Gibbs energy and its forward only directionality, AND only when 0>1...but this is a reflected beam so maybe its 9>1 ...like the square root math shows...this is exactly describing the forward only infinite ray i am talking about.......light follows this same pattern...in my experiments, using a laser, i was able to pump the energy to a higher level, increasing the visible flow of energy....the principles are correct.....the math says this is correct... experiments by me and others are saying this is correct....i have seen this energy flowing.....checkout the ferro fluid video again...at 30 sec see how the shape wavers?....this is the same type of distortion seen around devices....if this is nothing, it will fade away ....but it is what i claim and it will continue to grow.....i will post vids when i get some good footage.....david

[Harvey]

Hi Guys,

I think what David is saying is:

x = sqrt(.7129)
Do While x < 1
x = sqrt(x)
count = count + 1
if count > 100 then exit loop
loop
Print x
Print count

What that psuedocode does is recursively take the square root of your last answer ( which is x) up to 100 times and then prints the result of how many recursions were done along with the answer.

For .7129 the answer is less than one until you get up to about 52 recursions. Here is the output for 0.61059195:

0.999999999999986 45
0.999999999999993 46
0.999999999999996 47
0.999999999999998 48
0.999999999999999 49
1 50
1 51
1 52
1 53

There is still a very small portion less than 1 even at recursions 50 - 52 so the program continues to loop through those. It all depends on how much accuracy (decimal places) you wish to carry it out to.
And here is the actual VBA I used to produce it:

Public Sub Lambright()
Dim x, count
x = 0.61059195
Do While x < 1
x = x ^ (0.5)
count = count + 1
If count > 100 Then Exit Do
Debug.Print x; count
Loop
Debug.Print x; count; "Done"
End Sub

Of course if you are going to test Pi then you would need to set the Do While to x < 4 and you will see the iterations progress from 1.7724531023415 down to 1.00000000000001 in 47 recursions after which it will level at 1 (because the square root of 1 is 1).

Cheers,

[david lambright]

from the singularity outward at the speed of light

the way we experience gravity is by the reflection of an infinite ray....this infinite velocity reflected gives us gravity......the mechanism for this is the phase shift upon reflection of this infinite ray ....the infinite velocity goes on past this reflective point, but the out of phase reflection nullifies this second reflection so that the infinite velocity drops to the speed of light C [velocity]...this is why light is color ... the out of phase reflection makes light speed C and gravity is seemingly small but math says it will go infinite .....i will show this mathematically and experimental evidence to be correct......david.......if you do the calculations on the windows calculator, you get .99999999999999999999999999999998 then 1....i does not go to 9.......from eight to one ...every other number breaks down to .9999999999999999999999999999999 and then 1.... the inside surface of sphere is equal to 1...... a total internal reflection of the infinite point is equal to 1 the point . is where to measure from....infinite velocity reflected is the speed of light .....david

[gravityblock]

Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid

Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid.

GB

[solrey]

If you take any number and divide it by 2, then divide the result by 2 and so on, you will only approach 0 but never equal 0. The same applies to iterations of squaring any fraction/decimal between 0 and 1, you will only approach 0 but never equal 0. In the other direction if you take iterations of the square root of any fraction/decimal between 0 and 1 you will only approach 1 but never equal 1. The only reason windows calculator or Van's program flips to 1 at some point is because the calculations are only being carried to so many decimal places so once those spaces are full of 9's the next iteration rounds the result to 1.

the inside surface of sphere is equal to 1

What is that supposed to mean? Which aspect of the inside surface of a sphere?

Pi shows us the infinite by squaring the numbers .7129 all the way back near zero you will get 98.

pi is just the ratio between the circumference and the diameter of a circle (c/d=pi), which is a mathematical constant since the ratio is the same for all circles.

If that's the math for your theory, you might want to rethink it.

cheers

[Harvey]

If you take any number and divide it by 2, then divide the result by 2 and so on, you will only approach 0 but never equal 0. The same applies to iterations of squaring any fraction/decimal between 0 and 1, you will only approach 0 but never equal 0. In the other direction if you take iterations of the square root of any fraction/decimal between 0 and 1 you will only approach 1 but never equal 1. The only reason windows calculator or Van's program flips to 1 at some point is because the calculations are only being carried to so many decimal places so once those spaces are full of 9's the next iteration rounds the result to 1.



What is that supposed to mean? Which aspect of the inside surface of a sphere?



pi is just the ratio between the circumference and the diameter of a circle (c/d=pi), which is a mathematical constant since the ratio is the same for all circles.

If that's the math for your theory, you might want to rethink it.

cheers

I think I missed the link to Van's program

[Harvey]

Hi Gravity Block,

Thanks for that map. Is that an accumulation over a set period of time or just a series of snapshots of various regions all stitched together into a composite picture?

I find it interesting that most of the -200 nT regions are on the East side of elevated terrain while the +200 nT is on the West side. Perhaps this tells us something about how the planet moves through the magnetosphere as it spins.

[solrey]

Sorry, Harvey.

Good job, btw.

cheers

[Harvey]

Sorry, Harvey.

Good job, btw.

cheers

Thanks

[FuzzyTomCat]

I think I missed the link to Van's program

Hi Harvey,

Don't quite know about Van's program ..... but try Mark's

Long Number Calculator

Yes, this calculator has been revised (again), and now supports accuracies of at least 10,000 digits for all functions using PHP as the underlying programming language.

Best Regard's
Glen

[Harvey]

Thanks Glen,

But even if we could copy and paste the answers into the number box and hit calculate and have it do it all in one second, it would take nearly 3 hours worth of seconds to process the 10,000 digits manually assuming the next square root adds another 9 behind the previous on each iteration (which it doesn't).

So I think it's better to have a program loop through the iterations. MS Access does have a Cdec() function that will convert a variant type to Decimal with 28 decimal precision but that doesn't come close to 10,000 decimal places like marks calculator uses. As I stated before, the number of iterations is dependent on how accurate you want to be.

I think Python may offer Arbitrary-Precision arithmetic which is only limited to the memory available with regards to the precision of the calculation. I saw no need to take this exercise that far. Suffice it to say, as Solrey points out, the more precise you make any number between zero and one (number of decimal places), the closer you get to an infinite number of iterations taking each square root so as to never actually rounding up to the whole number 'One'.

[david lambright]

i know what you are thinking

if this is nothing it will fade away......is this guy for real???....YES....see my thread Pi paradox solved, here and i explain everything....for the FIRST time, the mechanics behind the effects are explained with experimental proof of Eds method unification of GRAVITY,MAGNETISM AND LIGHT and it is correct! it solves paradoxes.....we know the present model fails at the quantum level .....this model embraces the quantum fixes the classic to infinity.....david

[david lambright]

thank you solrey

Thanks Glen,

But even if we could copy and paste the answers into the number box and hit calculate and have it do it all in one second, it would take nearly 3 hours worth of seconds to process the 10,000 digits manually assuming the next square root adds another 9 behind the previous on each iteration (which it doesn't).

So I think it's better to have a program loop through the iterations. MS Access does have a Cdec() function that will convert a variant type to Decimal with 28 decimal precision but that doesn't come close to 10,000 decimal places like marks calculator uses. As I stated before, the number of iterations is dependent on how accurate you want to be.

I think Python may offer Arbitrary-Precision arithmetic which is only limited to the memory available with regards to the precision of the calculation. I saw no need to take this exercise that far. Suffice it to say, as Solrey points out, the more precise you make any number between zero and one (number of decimal places), the closer you get to an infinite number of iterations taking each square root so as to never actually rounding up to the whole number 'One'.

thank you solrey...this is exactly what i am trying to POINT out ....our existence is a spherical reflection of an Infinite Point.....the infinite is a point, a line, a ray , a disc, a spiral etc. please critique my thesis.....see Pi paradox solved....david ...ps http://www.energeticforum.com/member...lambright.html here is the link,,,david