An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[Gambeir]

Gambier, I will explain it again. When a magnetic field varies with respect to time, in close proximity to a material that "conducts" electricity, an electromotive force will be induced to the conductor. This conductor due to current flow, will initiate a magnetic field to form. These two magnetic fields may "repel" or "attract" each other depending on the arrangement, which imparts a physical and real force.

These forces will act in "magnet and copper pipe experiment", because the pipe can be a conductor of electricity with the material commonly chosen for the experiment (copper for example). Because of the direction the magnetic field in the pipe has been induced (like poles are "touching"), the magnetic field of the permanent magnet and pipe will repel each other. First, the permanent magnet imparts a force on the copper pipe's magnetic field (which pushes the pipe down since the magnetic field is anchored to the pipe), which results in the "weight" increase I have already explained in my past post. Second, the magnetic field of the pipe will push back on the permanent magnet, this is Newton's Third Law of Motion in action. Newton's Third Law of Motion meaning, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so if I exert a force on a wall the wall will exert a force back on me. This action will occur for the permanent magnet, which is why its rate of fall to the Earth is slowed.

Now, as far as the "expanding dielectric inertia plane", no, the video I think you're talking about is already explained by Faraday's Law. When you're talking about the "first" video where he talks about magnetism, there's the below one first I found.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0

There he talks about his invented magnetic toy, he doesn't talk anything about the "dielectric inertia plane" in there, so I assume you mean a different video? I found the "Video 1, Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism", there he talks about it, so I'm going to use that video for now. There he makes the claim the "dielectric inertia plane" expands with motion, but this is just unnecessary. Again, the induced magnetic forces will be stronger if the time they occur is less, it is analogous to power (work divided by time equals power, let time be reduced and power rises).

This is why Ken observed less nails being attracted when going slower, and got more nails when moving faster because the induced field was stronger which made the attraction on the nails stronger during that period. The reason why less nails fell is likely because the more attracted nails to the magnet, caused some surrounding nails in the magnetic toy to be slightly displaced. So when other nails fall when Ken flips the toy over, the nails get a bit stuck and we see this. You even see the nails get stuck at around 6:32 in the video even when trying to flip the toy back over. And even when shaking the toy a few seconds later, he has to give a few good shakes to make the surrounding nails that get even a little stuck fall back down.

With this, there is no new magnetic "theory" needed to explain his video, because its already been explained, but due to ignorance apparently not. If there was an issue with modern theories not being able to explain these nails, then it would be talked about, but its not, because it can already be explained to the people who have been educated. I've only found one person in the comments section of that video who attempted to explain the results with known scientific theories, which kind of scares me.

Ken's logic and rejection of basic principles in the context of his "theory", would send us back to the science and understanding of the 17th century. If he says the force on a conductive pipe isn't caused magnetism, but the flawed "induction of weight", then almost all modern technology is flushed down the toilet. For the "induction of weight" to work, there must be: no Faraday's Law, no Lenz's Law, no Newton's Third Law of Motion. So, all foundational electrical understanding and principles that build of off these can be dumped into the trash. No Newton's Third Law, no industrial revolution. Quite a disaster to reject and ignore all of those by assuming they don't contribute in that situation. Ken has repeatability shown his wrongness and ignorance in this, because he doesn't know physics, he can make a "new explanation", and say other explanations are wrong, he knows everything about magnetism, everyone else is wrong because he's right, Einstein is a crackpot and we should call him names and personally insult him. Seriously, this is sounding like delusional behavior to me, it's like watching people deny the Earth is round, yet don't know any science and reject accepted explanations to feel like they're superior. We cannot go down this path for progress. Ken Wheeler is not a luminary for truth if he repeatedly makes these misleading statements. Remember, the "wise" people that watch his videos, seem to be people mostly uneducated in physics and science.

I have already given the scientific explanation to the pipe experiment, just because you don't understand it or it doesn't see simple to you, doesn't change it from established fact. From what I remember, you've told me in conversation already that you don't know physics, what I've given you is already an explanation from the physics perspective. It's been confirmed millions of times throughout the world scientifically, yet you deny what's already been shown in favor of something else unsubstantiated. At the end of the day, you cannot always ignore other information, which is why many people are gullible to this stuff, they ignore, are in denial, or ignorant. What's true is true, and that's how it is.

With Alexey's videos, I don't think its a good idea to jump to conclusions. The videos could've easily been faked with today's digital technology, but I don't know. We can't trust every video or photo, because people will do these things for whatever their own motivations are. So, far nobody has appeared to replicate that device, but I tend to personally learn on the opinion it's likely to be a hoax.

I've heard of that movie you've mentioned. I can enjoy some good Mozart every now and then, I'm personally more of a Bach person to be honest. Bach's music is really beautiful to me, but Mozart is great too.

References:

Video 1 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWMu0cndKl4
MAGGI, Magnetic Perpetual Motion Art. Neodymium-Yagi device using Magnetosphere and EM Induction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0
Faraday's law of induction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farada...w_of_induction
Electric generatorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_generator
Crystal Structures of Metals: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshel...electroplating.

Doofus I know you think you understand, but please stop trying to convince me to agree with you because I won't, and if you do understand, as you apparently insist, and if you're correct, then you should be able to make a working model: Models have always been the first method of proving concepts. You should make something instead of trying to tear Wheeler down. You're not going to convince me you understand by saying that Ken Wheeler doesn't, and so you should just give that concept up. I think it's really probably proper for you to take your explanations and apply them to your own thread first.

I know you're ideas may work to a certain degree but the fundamental model offered by Ken Wheeler is the correct model and ya know how I know that? I Know that because I reverse engineered the Vril Saucer drawings sufficiently enough to grasp what was taking place, which is something I don't think anyone else has ever done, but what I can say about that is you can use Ken's model and apply it to explain how and why the so called Schumann Levitator works.

It's important to understand that in the Levitator design the counterspatial activity is taking place in a liquid medium, and as such it isn't attached to the vehicle itself but rather is insulated from the body of the machine. In so doing we are not then attaching a fan to the back end of a sail boat hoping to drive ourselves across the water. To understand why that is important you would have to appreciate Ken Wheeler's dielectric theory of magnetism and gravity, but for those who do you can use the gravitational model theorized by Ken Wheeler to explain the operation of the Schumann levitator, and you cannot do that with the system you are proposing.

Yes, it is true that almost everyone whose ever looked at the ARV drawing all have similar thoughts to your own, I've heard them many times, you are not the first one to make such suggestions as the most likely explanation for how it works, of that I can assure you but I doubt that what you think is correct, and not because what you've proposed is inaccurate but rather that it's missing the fundamental understanding of what is actually taking place, and that is where the Levitator design actually proves out the Wheeler model of gravity. It is here where the length of this thread and the course of the historical path taken to conquer gravity becomes valuable in the extreme because to understand the hidden history enables one to understand that the ARV is only another evolutionary experimental step to go beyond the Schumann design. It doesn't mean it is a superior design, it just means it was another probable design, undoubtedly one of many given the virtually unlimited budget available to the defense contractors., but above all else that historical approach shows that the real reason the machine works is because the gravitational model proposed as theory by Ken Wheeler is the correct model and that's really the most important thing to get out of the entire lot.

Gravity is exactly what Ken Wheeler has described it to be and nothing else. It is simply incoherent magnetic/polarized bits of matter all co-joined by random incoherence of their own polarized (ie, magnetic) fields, and which when sufficiently large enough in volume will produce a coherence of magnetism, and when a coherent magnetic field is present then a counter spatial center point is present, and when those exist then gravity exists, and from that point all matter, be it coherent or incoherent, will seek to move towards that point source leading to counter space.

All you need to really do is to create another point source & which is not physically attached to the same vehicle that is creating it. Now I've already given (freely) a clear suggestion of how to accomplish that with the simplified schematic and I've already given, again totally free, a general understanding of the theory of operation to the Schumann Levitator, which actually fits precisely in line with the Ken Wheeler's dielectric field theory of gravity in how it operates, and that cannot be accidental but rather has to be because it is a real working design. Certainly it would take some physical experimentation and testing to get all the details worked out but the over all system, it's theory of operation is clear and understandable to those whom understand Ken's model of gravity.

[BroMikey]

During the election results, congress needs the UFO intel, see doc

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/covid-19-bill-180-day-countdown-ufo-disclosures

https://www.complex.com/life/2020/12/classified-ufo-documents-released-180-guests-covid-19-bill

[spacecase0]

interesting idea of how it works, I was not planning on running that test, but I sure will now. I agree that the people in the video are a bit focused, I was only excited at the location of the coils that create the rotating magnetic field that I was previously convinced was in there somewhere.

[phoneboy]

spacecase0, had an Ah Ha! moment with this in early November (at least thats what i believe, gave me a nasty headache). Unfortunately for me, I've alwsys been one of those people who consciously gets concepts all at once. Was on the web, saw an image, and my weird ass brain put all the peices together.

I'm putting together a small $30 proof of concept as you don't necessarily have to do this The ARV way. If it works I'll say yay or nay.

Specifically with regards to the ARV, a high voltage supply is necessary but the caps are only there to store it as most high voltage supplies are current limited. Steering is accomplished a different way, Mccandlishes drawing is a bit misleading.

I believe this device is working like this. Lets say your the big bad wolf and you're suck on a sailboat in the middle of a lake with no wind. You secure yourself to the boat and blow on the sail. Now we all know you wont get anywhere normally. This device is taking the force you apply and separating it from you so its acting on the boat/sail as if it was generated externally. Its remarkably simple as nature does this for you.

The folks on that video you posted are going down the rabbit hole with this device specifically. They're way overcomplicating it

[spacecase0]

I hope I get formatting now. the one researcher was somewhat known, he was at a university, and supposedly the test setup was confiscated by the USA government. If I remember correct, it was 2 copper plates (not sure if they were the same size or not) that were encased in epoxy. when charged it was said to float. the one in brazil was just a website I ran across, he was trying to get the word out on what was going on. and it would seem as if I forgot what the last one was... would seem to be a few holes in my memory lately. it will be a while before I get to the Van de Graaff tests. another way to look at all this is that gravity is caused by a change in how fast time flows. A magnetic vortex like in an atom spends more time on the slow side so it moves in that direction. and time fields are created by a rotating magnetic field (just like the internal spin of atoms). the way this works is that the more intense the time field the slower time on the clock progresses. so we have 3 field forces, time (why not express it in spin...), electricity (call it divergent spin), and magnetism (most seem to agree it is the curl of electricity). Gravity eluded people because it is a side effect of the time field. (the space-time idea makes the math on this so messy that people don't figure it out from that point of view). looking at this from another view, you can get over gravity with high enough voltage on a capacitor, but at least in my tests all the movement is only when you are charging the capacitor, so not super useful for anything more than steering. The ARV is basically an open air electron accelerator, very close to the cyclotron (yes, also asymmetrical to get the required movement). It charges the entire craft to huge voltages by stripping electrons from the craft and adding them to an electron vortex around it that makes even a stronger rotational magnetic field. I am very confidant in all this because I have seen each idea of this work on its own before, putting the parts together is logical step to my experiments (even thought it is pricy and I may not be able to get it done). Only if I fail in this will I go back to earlier experiments and try to show others with video and proper documentation as I failed to do the first time. I think the big thing that people are not looking at is just how critical the rotational magnetic field is to all this. If I can I will at least try to show others what the rotating magnetic field does.

[Doofus Nugget]

I have seen 3 separate researchers claim that voltages in the 2MV to 3MV range creates total weight loss. one was in Brazil, and his website is long gone now. at least he seemed to not know of TT brown. I have been working on building a Van de Graaff generator to test it, but other projects have distracted me. it is not a pricey test to run as I can build all the hardware needed.

Hi spacecase0, that seems interesting, do you know the details on those researchers and what they exactly claimed in detail? If you are willing to do that I'd appreciate it.

Also, maybe as a suggestion for something to test the with a Van de Graaff generator, maybe you could try to check for variation in background radioactivity, to test for Tesla's theory of radioactivity, since the particles he spoke of are apparently positively charged, maybe something could come out of it? And maybe, maybe, since such primary solar ray particles spoken off by Tesla, they could be controlled with high potential fields, to check if their impacts with atomic matter have any correlation to gravitational acceleration experienced? Those would be my suggestions as ideas to use the Van de Graaff in scientific experimentation, at least what I'm most curious about at the moment. I haven't much to spend on experimenting, I'm planning on getting some things during this holiday season to experiment on, I'd be interested in testing the Cavernous Structure Effect since it appears very simple to generate.

And another thought before I forget, I remember in posts you mention you have no formatting capability. If you check at the top bar where you type: there's a camera symbol, link button, upload attachments button, smile face, and letter "A". If this isn't toggled it won't allow you to format/edit your posts in what you'd expect, maybe that's your problem that it became un-toggled? Anyway, good luck on the Van de Graaff then.

[Doofus Nugget]

You're wasting your time with me Doofus. I understand and I'm explaining it clearly. Something you are not doing. If you don't want to accept that Ken Wheeler is the foremost luminary of our time that's your choice, but I will say this is no where near as complex as you're making it out to be.

As an example, all that's happening in the Alexey device is that the aluminum plate forms a proxy artificial electrostatic field and assisted by the crystalline structure of the aluminum which has a greater capacitance due to it's ability to filter and then hold incoherent dielectric energy, and which is made possible by the crystalline structure of the metal: A prismatic effect induced by the crystalline structure of aluminum similar to a piezo~electric in a sense but not the same, which is why the ARV used a piezo~electric quartz as the basis for the so~called capacitor plates in it's design. In the Alexey device spinning the magnets results in an acceleration of their own dielectric planes of dielectric inertia, causing these dielectric accretion disks to expand, a physically proven fact shown in Ken Wheeler's very first video on magnetism, and then these are individually combining with each other to form a larger dielectric accretion disk, and which then gives a multiplicative effect to the accumulation of the surrounding dielectric field.

None of the described actions are visible. UV light is not visible and the dielectric is not visible under normal conditions. Indeed it isn't even officially acknowledged.

Weight in mass is created by the induction of the dielectric when it is co~joined perpendicular to the magnetic. That is clearly visible in the Alexey device. Indeed, it is the predominate foremost visible feature of the model.

I'll be laughing when someday a kid comes up with rubber band powered flying model and hey that's not as far fetched as some might imagine. You simply have to understand what's really happening in order to conceive how it might be possible. I would suggest you watch the Movie Amadeus. Ken Wheeler is the luminary of our time and those wise enough will see and recognize that truth.

Gambier, I will explain it again. When a magnetic field varies with respect to time, in close proximity to a material that "conducts" electricity, an electromotive force will be induced to the conductor. This conductor due to current flow, will initiate a magnetic field to form. These two magnetic fields may "repel" or "attract" each other depending on the arrangement, which imparts a physical and real force.

These forces will act in "magnet and copper pipe experiment", because the pipe can be a conductor of electricity with the material commonly chosen for the experiment (copper for example). Because of the direction the magnetic field in the pipe has been induced (like poles are "touching"), the magnetic field of the permanent magnet and pipe will repel each other. First, the permanent magnet imparts a force on the copper pipe's magnetic field (which pushes the pipe down since the magnetic field is anchored to the pipe), which results in the "weight" increase I have already explained in my past post. Second, the magnetic field of the pipe will push back on the permanent magnet, this is Newton's Third Law of Motion in action. Newton's Third Law of Motion meaning, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so if I exert a force on a wall the wall will exert a force back on me. This action will occur for the permanent magnet, which is why its rate of fall to the Earth is slowed.

Now, as far as the "expanding dielectric inertia plane", no, the video I think you're talking about is already explained by Faraday's Law. When you're talking about the "first" video where he talks about magnetism, there's the below one first I found.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0

There he talks about his invented magnetic toy, he doesn't talk anything about the "dielectric inertia plane" in there, so I assume you mean a different video? I found the "Video 1, Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism", there he talks about it, so I'm going to use that video for now. There he makes the claim the "dielectric inertia plane" expands with motion, but this is just unnecessary. Again, the induced magnetic forces will be stronger if the time they occur is less, it is analogous to power (work divided by time equals power, let time be reduced and power rises).

This is why Ken observed less nails being attracted when going slower, and got more nails when moving faster because the induced field was stronger which made the attraction on the nails stronger during that period. The reason why less nails fell is likely because the more attracted nails to the magnet, caused some surrounding nails in the magnetic toy to be slightly displaced. So when other nails fall when Ken flips the toy over, the nails get a bit stuck and we see this. You even see the nails get stuck at around 6:32 in the video even when trying to flip the toy back over. And even when shaking the toy a few seconds later, he has to give a few good shakes to make the surrounding nails that get even a little stuck fall back down.

With this, there is no new magnetic "theory" needed to explain his video, because its already been explained, but due to ignorance apparently not. If there was an issue with modern theories not being able to explain these nails, then it would be talked about, but its not, because it can already be explained to the people who have been educated. I've only found one person in the comments section of that video who attempted to explain the results with known scientific theories, which kind of scares me.

Ken's logic and rejection of basic principles in the context of his "theory", would send us back to the science and understanding of the 17th century. If he says the force on a conductive pipe isn't caused magnetism, but the flawed "induction of weight", then almost all modern technology is flushed down the toilet. For the "induction of weight" to work, there must be: no Faraday's Law, no Lenz's Law, no Newton's Third Law of Motion. So, all foundational electrical understanding and principles that build of off these can be dumped into the trash. No Newton's Third Law, no industrial revolution. Quite a disaster to reject and ignore all of those by assuming they don't contribute in that situation. Ken has repeatability shown his wrongness and ignorance in this, because he doesn't know physics, he can make a "new explanation", and say other explanations are wrong, he knows everything about magnetism, everyone else is wrong because he's right, Einstein is a crackpot and we should call him names and personally insult him. Seriously, this is sounding like delusional behavior to me, it's like watching people deny the Earth is round, yet don't know any science and reject accepted explanations to feel like they're superior. We cannot go down this path for progress. Ken Wheeler is not a luminary for truth if he repeatedly makes these misleading statements. Remember, the "wise" people that watch his videos, seem to be people mostly uneducated in physics and science.

I have already given the scientific explanation to the pipe experiment, just because you don't understand it or it doesn't see simple to you, doesn't change it from established fact. From what I remember, you've told me in conversation already that you don't know physics, what I've given you is already an explanation from the physics perspective. It's been confirmed millions of times throughout the world scientifically, yet you deny what's already been shown in favor of something else unsubstantiated. At the end of the day, you cannot always ignore other information, which is why many people are gullible to this stuff, they ignore, are in denial, or ignorant. What's true is true, and that's how it is.

With Alexey's videos, I don't think its a good idea to jump to conclusions. The videos could've easily been faked with today's digital technology, but I don't know. We can't trust every video or photo, because people will do these things for whatever their own motivations are. So, far nobody has appeared to replicate that device, but I tend to personally learn on the opinion it's likely to be a hoax.

I've heard of that movie you've mentioned. I can enjoy some good Mozart every now and then, I'm personally more of a Bach person to be honest. Bach's music is really beautiful to me, but Mozart is great too.

References:

Video 1 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWMu0cndKl4
MAGGI, Magnetic Perpetual Motion Art. Neodymium-Yagi device using Magnetosphere and EM Induction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0
Faraday's law of induction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farada...w_of_induction
Electric generatorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_generator
Crystal Structures of Metals: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshel...electroplating.

[spacecase0]

I have seen 3 separate researchers claim that voltages in the 2MV to 3MV range creates total weight loss. one was in Brazil, and his website is long gone now. at least he seemed to not know of TT brown. I have been working on building a Van de Graaff generator to test it, but other projects have distracted me. it is not a pricey test to run as I can build all the hardware needed.

[Gambeir]

You're wasting your time with me Doofus. I understand and I'm explaining it clearly. Something you are not doing. If you don't want to accept that Ken Wheeler is the foremost luminary of our time that's your choice, but I will say this is no where near as complex as you're making it out to be.

As an example, all that's happening in the Alexey device is that the aluminum plate forms a proxy artificial electrostatic field and assisted by the crystalline structure of the aluminum which has a greater capacitance due to it's ability to filter and then hold incoherent dielectric energy, and which is made possible by the crystalline structure of the metal: A prismatic effect induced by the crystalline structure of aluminum similar to a piezo~electric in a sense but not the same, which is why the ARV used a piezo~electric quartz as the basis for the so~called capacitor plates in it's design. In the Alexey device spinning the magnets results in an acceleration of their own dielectric planes of dielectric inertia, causing these dielectric accretion disks to expand, a physically proven fact shown in Ken Wheeler's very first video on magnetism, and then these are individually combining with each other to form a larger dielectric accretion disk, and which then gives a multiplicative effect to the accumulation of the surrounding dielectric field.

None of the described actions are visible. UV light is not visible and the dielectric is not visible under normal conditions. Indeed it isn't even officially acknowledged.

Weight in mass is created by the induction of the dielectric when it is co~joined perpendicular to the magnetic. That is clearly visible in the Alexey device. Indeed, it is the predominate foremost visible feature of the model.

I'll be laughing when someday a kid comes up with rubber band powered flying model and hey that's not as far fetched as some might imagine. You simply have to understand what's really happening in order to conceive how it might be possible. I would suggest you watch the Movie Amadeus. Ken Wheeler is the luminary of our time and those wise enough will see and recognize that truth.

[Doofus Nugget]

no idea how this will post being that I have no formatting or editing ability here. here is a video https://www.youtube.com/embed/_w3eTfFX7Ss they verify the rotating magnetic field... so this device is getting clearer, the capacitor section is for steering only, the asymmetric vertical magnetic field is powered by the homopolar generator. together with the rotating magnetic field is what makes it float and move. to bad the people that made the video don't know all the details. it is the electron vortex that this device makes that does most of the effect, and also why they often appear to change color and size, the electron vortex changes as you change the field for various movement.

I remember seeing part of the video when it came out, it was interesting. There's one claim from Mark McClandish that shook me, where he states from something he got from an experimenter that, if you get the Biefeld-Brown up beyond a threshold voltage of 1.2 million volts, the weight of objects in the surrounding space will decrease. I found that quite fascinating, and certainly something I'd like to investigate when I can start affording more experimental supplies.

From what I've seen of the video and what is claimed in the video, it appears the central column is some kind of electrostatic generator, similar in remarks to Nikola Tesla's electrostatic generator he proposed using for his "Teleforce particle projectors". However, it seems that voltages circulating in the column would be lower, below 10 kilovolts at the output of the column I think (but I could be wrong, I remember it was stated in the video somewhere what voltages came out of this column), which in my opinion probably wouldn't contribute as much to the overall "levitation" effect. That's why I think the levitation effect comes from beyond this 1.2 million volt threshold, if it can be confirmed separately. Considering that it's alleged the capacitor plates would operate at beyond 10 million volts, the resultant "weight losses" would be left to imagination. Thomas Townsend Brown and several others really only went so far with the effect, never really beyond the hundreds of kilovolts, so it makes sense that this effect claimed by Mcclandish was never reported by Brown. So, you'd really have to get the Biefeld-Brown Effect at a "higher level" than what the common person normally has access to, in order see any supposed results.

In my opinion, that specific effect should be the most important thing to look at in terms of all this, since it appears the most tangible in my mind.

[Doofus Nugget]

Strings, fishing lines, and other inventions are not realistic and do not explain what is obviously physically possible, as proven by millions of photos and eyewitness accounts, and that is not the path of a true detective. We don't seek to explain away something simply because we don't understand what we see; instead the true detective seeks to understand what they are seeing and that is the path of the true detective because obviously the machines are real and obviously they do not work according to the fraudulent physics of academia, and so lacking anything else reasonable we have to come up with fishing lines and strings?

That photo was taken by USAF military air transport pilots.
It's real. The black bottom and other artifacts prove it's not a fraud.
You just have to understand what you're seeing is all.

The machine works like any other flying machine in that the principles which govern it's operation are no more complex than those which govern that of a model airplane. It's simply not been clearly understood previously. Not by me and not by really anyone else that I know of. * Except of course Ken Wheeler because obviously he did understand.

In general all that's taking place is the surrounding dielectric field is being taken in by an accretion disk and this is visible because the base, or bottom, is dark to pitch black and completely non reflective.

The accretion disk is a rotating magnetic field because accelerating the magnetic field speeds up the dielectric plane of inertia, which then gather in the surrounding dielectric field. and afterwards this same, or another, magnetic field holds the accumulated dielectric mass, and which is then creating a false mass, and we know this is correct because field theory says that weight in mass is produced by induction, so therefore a true real mass is unnecessary and unwanted. Instead a mass of accumulated dielectric energy is formed out of the surrounding dielectric field.

Mass A, the real mass, which is composed of an incoherent magneto-electric field, does then attempt to form a singularity with the false mass which is entirely made from an incoherent dielectric energy field, and then due to the incommensurability of magnetism, which will always seek to maintain a singularity, each mass will move towards each other to reform a singularity of the magnetic dielectric, but since we have mass B, the false mass contained in a hollow column and suspended in free space, then these two mass's will forever be held apart whilst continually trying to moving towards the null point between themselves and seeking to reform a singularity to form a whole mass. The result is then that such a machine can produce instantaneous acceleration.

The manipulation of the contained dielectric mass is responsible for all other observed phenomena associated with UFO's. All UFO phenomena is explained by Ken Wheeler's dielectric theory of magnetism.

That's all there is to it and anything else is delusional.

We now have a complete and accurate understanding of the ARV since the capacitor plates are what we knew the most about when this inquiry began and the design of those are perfectly in line with the theory of operation for this machine.

.
Mark McCandlish drew a virtual blueprint of a real working machine: the one shown in the photo: We simply didn't have the physics to understand it's operation when this inquiry began but we do today thanks to Ken Wheeler and maybe a bit of detective work has helped some to understand how his field theory applies to the physics of these machines.


If you watched the previously attached video's then watch the same effects here in Ken's latest video.
Case Closed. Mystery Solved. The information is now free and we will see what I've said here vindicated in the very near future.

NATURE’S CONJUGATE FIELD EXPLAINED

Gambier, what I'm pointing out with just this picture... is that there's a physical wire that appears to be supporting this specific "UFO" in this specific photograph. I'm not saying these machines don't exist, or that the "Alien Reproduction Vehicle" wasn't a real thing. So, please analyze the photograph more carefully so you can understand what I see, zoom in and take your time.

Picture1.png

Picture2.png

I've even include a more "artistic" pixelated picture, which may or may not help you see what I'm seeing. Hopefully the multiple pictures can arrows I've put, can show you that there's a wire sticking out of the top of this "UFO", that's just what's in the picture, a fact. Maybe you cannot see it for some reason, maybe I have better eyesight or am noticing patterns better, I just hope you can see what I'm talking about visually.

Now, just because it was taken by ONE air force pilot (Harvey Williams), does not mean that this photograph is suddenly not a hoax. Just because someone may be perceived has having a "higher status" doesn't always contribute to someone's credibility (meaning they are honest). And, the "black void", well its black what does that mean? Well, that just means there's no reflected visible light coming back to hit your eyeballs in that area of space. The correlation to the ferrocell and "dielectric portals/black holes" is not correct. The dark spot on the ferrocells simply means that light is refracted in such a way due to the magnetic orientation of the fluid particles inside the ferrocell, which results in there being dark voids with no light, which is how a ferrocell works. To compare the ferrocell and a "black spot" that happens to be there in the photo, is jumping to conclusions. Even if this photograph wasn't a hoax, then I feel it would be dishonest to say this only has one single possibility and every other possible explanation is suddenly delusional, what? That does not make sense to me. If its a black "void", it just means there's a lack of light reflecting off that surface that reaches the camera, meaning something is probably obstructing the light, which can simply be the body of this "saucer" itself, or perhaps other unknown variables of the conditions in the environment.

The dark spot in the ferrocell video is merely from light refraction of the light from the LEDs, due to orientation of the particles of the fluid in the ferrocell caused by the magnetic field of the permanent magnet present. To assume there's a connection, is misleading within the context of the ferrocell.

As far as Ken Wheeler's "theory" goes, I've personally never seen any evidence myself that indicates direct support of it, from what is claimed as "evidence" through his own experimentation is Ken's own misrepresentations. His claimed "gravity is caused by induction" experiment (dropping magnet in copper pipe), falls apart completely due to his rejection or ignorance of basic electrical and physical foundations (Faraday's Law, Lenz's Law, Newton's Third Law of Motion, and Eddy Currents). He claims that Lenz's Law cannot explain why the weight of the copper pipe increased, yet this is completely false. Lenz's Law is at the very foundation of why the weight increases, but other factors are here too.

The weight increase is due to the fact that as the magnet falls, a magnetic field is induced around the copper pipe, this new magnetic field opposes the original falling magnet, which slows its fall. However, when the new magnetic field opposes "pushes" the falling magnet with its field, the magnet's field pushes back on the pipe's magnetic field (which accounts for the weight increase). But, this means the weight increase is dependent on the electrical resistance of the pipe, and the magnetic field of the falling magnet. Ken's fallacy is that he assumes the weight of the permanent magnet he used should fully be transferred to the weight of the copper pipe, but this is a wrong assumption. For example, if you reduce the resistance of pipe then the resultant magnetic field induced around the pipe will be less, likewise the push on the permanent magnet will be less, and therefore the force of the falling magnet pushing on the pipe's magnetic field will be less, so the weight increase will be less.

The push exerted by a falling magnet's field is shown by SuperMagnetMan's video (which I put in the references of this post), but he uses copper coils instead, however the principle is the same with the copper pipe.

To assume that Ken's ideas are the only answer to these things, is not a good path to go down. From what I've seen and listening from him, he really is very misleading and for the sake of wanting to understanding how things work, I think you'll go down a wrong track. Given that its heavily implied Ken lacks an understanding of basic principles, I'd recommend being highly cautious about what he says/claims and not take it at face value.

I would highly recommend you fully check all the references I list, 100%.

References:

(Theoria Apophasis) Fallacy of Gravity & Weight. Everything is electrical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyKHF5KdWVA
(Planarwalk) According to Theoria, Gravity is Just Magnetism and Word Salad (ft. @AB science): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qfC...mQEtl3l422wCWW
(Verbz) Ken Wheeler's Ferrocell Videos - Confused Observations and Misleading Terminology: https://steemit.com/science/@verbz/k...ng-terminology
(ElectroBOOM) The Amazing Eddy Current: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7Rg0TcHQ4Y
(SuperMagnetMan) Magnetism and Wave Generation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oq40SqxnDvM

[spacecase0]

no idea how this will post being that I have no formatting or editing ability here. here is a video https://www.youtube.com/embed/_w3eTfFX7Ss they verify the rotating magnetic field... so this device is getting clearer, the capacitor section is for steering only, the asymmetric vertical magnetic field is powered by the homopolar generator. together with the rotating magnetic field is what makes it float and move. to bad the people that made the video don't know all the details. it is the electron vortex that this device makes that does most of the effect, and also why they often appear to change color and size, the electron vortex changes as you change the field for various movement.

[Gambeir]

1967 Provo, Utah UFO Hoax:

In 1967, a pilot named Harvey Williams allegedly encountered a UFO (unidentified flying object), and was apparently able to take a photograph. Below are two pictures of the supposed UFO, one in "black and white" and the other is colorized.

(1967) Provo Utah Ufo Hoax Picture in Black and White.jpg(1967) Provo Utah Ufo Hoax Picture in Color.jpg

Hopefully, most people with well-working eyeballs should be able to tell the obvious problem with this, its fake. Look closely at the top of the "UFO", you'll see what appears to be a wire or string extending beyond the picture. You know, it has always bugged me why most "flying saucers" need to have long lines extending always from the top, as if it was being positioned or held there. We never see any "UFOs" birthed from "mother ships" with their umbilical cords still attached, so what gives? Well, this was a very simple trick back in 1940s-1960s when picture quality was poorer and in "black and white". This made these wires harder to see and apparently fooled many people. Just look at older UFO photographs, and you may start to see the similarities.

George Adamski, Howard Menger, Billy Meier, Daniel Fry, all had at least one thing in common, they all faked their photos with armature wires. ALL FAKE. "But wait! They stayed loyal to their UFO stories their entire lives, so they MUST be truthful." Well... some people will go to strange lengths for whatever they want. Their photos are fake, fake, that's it. What do you think that says about those people I mentioned above?

I reason I bring this topic up is that many people tend to attribute the above pictures as "evidence" for the existence of the "Alien Reproduction Vehicle" or "Flux Liner". Well, not really evidence supporting the its existence anymore, is it? I'm surprised the Mark Mccandish didn't catch this one since at least 20 years ago. So, its important to fact check these things and not blindly believe everything someone says because, they could be wrong whether intentionally or not. Don't be afraid to do your own research, it can really go a long way to find out things for yourself.

(1967) Provo Utah Ufo Hoax Picture in Black and White Cropped.png

Strings, fishing lines, and other inventions are not realistic and do not explain what is obviously physically possible, as proven by millions of photos and eyewitness accounts, and that is not the path of a true detective. We don't seek to explain away something simply because we don't understand what we see; instead the true detective seeks to understand what they are seeing and that is the path of the true detective because obviously the machines are real and obviously they do not work according to the fraudulent physics of academia, and so lacking anything else reasonable we have to come up with fishing lines and strings?

That photo was taken by USAF military air transport pilots.
It's real. The black bottom and other artifacts prove it's not a fraud.
You just have to understand what you're seeing is all.

The machine works like any other flying machine in that the principles which govern it's operation are no more complex than those which govern that of a model airplane. It's simply not been clearly understood previously. Not by me and not by really anyone else that I know of. * Except of course Ken Wheeler because obviously he did understand.

In general all that's taking place is the surrounding dielectric field is being taken in by an accretion disk and this is visible because the base, or bottom, is dark to pitch black and completely non reflective.

The accretion disk is a rotating magnetic field because accelerating the magnetic field speeds up the dielectric plane of inertia, which then gather in the surrounding dielectric field. and afterwards this same, or another, magnetic field holds the accumulated dielectric mass, and which is then creating a false mass, and we know this is correct because field theory says that weight in mass is produced by induction, so therefore a true real mass is unnecessary and unwanted. Instead a mass of accumulated dielectric energy is formed out of the surrounding dielectric field.

Mass A, the real mass, which is composed of an incoherent magneto-electric field, does then attempt to form a singularity with the false mass which is entirely made from an incoherent dielectric energy field, and then due to the incommensurability of magnetism, which will always seek to maintain a singularity, each mass will move towards each other to reform a singularity of the magnetic dielectric, but since we have mass B, the false mass contained in a hollow column and suspended in free space, then these two mass's will forever be held apart whilst continually trying to moving towards the null point between themselves and seeking to reform a singularity to form a whole mass. The result is then that such a machine can produce instantaneous acceleration.

The manipulation of the contained dielectric mass is responsible for all other observed phenomena associated with UFO's. All UFO phenomena is explained by Ken Wheeler's dielectric theory of magnetism.

That's all there is to it and anything else is delusional.

We now have a complete and accurate understanding of the ARV since the capacitor plates are what we knew the most about when this inquiry began and the design of those are perfectly in line with the theory of operation for this machine.

.
Mark McCandlish drew a virtual blueprint of a real working machine: the one shown in the photo: We simply didn't have the physics to understand it's operation when this inquiry began but we do today thanks to Ken Wheeler and maybe a bit of detective work has helped some to understand how his field theory applies to the physics of these machines.


If you watched the previously attached video's then watch the same effects here in Ken's latest video.
Case Closed. Mystery Solved. The information is now free and we will see what I've said here vindicated in the very near future.

NATURE’S CONJUGATE FIELD EXPLAINED

[Doofus Nugget]

1967 Provo, Utah UFO Hoax:

In 1967, a pilot named Harvey Williams allegedly encountered a UFO (unidentified flying object), and was apparently able to take a photograph. Below are two pictures of the supposed UFO, one in "black and white" and the other is colorized.

(1967) Provo Utah Ufo Hoax Picture in Black and White.jpg(1967) Provo Utah Ufo Hoax Picture in Color.jpg

Hopefully, most people with well-working eyeballs should be able to tell the obvious problem with this, its fake. Look closely at the top of the "UFO", you'll see what appears to be a wire or string extending beyond the picture. You know, it has always bugged me why most "flying saucers" need to have long lines extending always from the top, as if it was being positioned or held there. We never see any "UFOs" birthed from "mother ships" with their umbilical cords still attached, so what gives? Well, this was a very simple trick back in 1940s-1960s when picture quality was poorer and in "black and white". This made these wires harder to see and apparently fooled many people. Just look at older UFO photographs, and you may start to see the similarities.

George Adamski, Howard Menger, Billy Meier, Daniel Fry, all had at least one thing in common, they all faked their photos with armature wires. ALL FAKE. "But wait! They stayed loyal to their UFO stories their entire lives, so they MUST be truthful." Well... some people will go to strange lengths for whatever they want. Their photos are fake, fake, that's it. What do you think that says about those people I mentioned above?

I reason I bring this topic up is that many people tend to attribute the above pictures as "evidence" for the existence of the "Alien Reproduction Vehicle" or "Flux Liner". Well, not really evidence supporting the its existence anymore, is it? I'm surprised the Mark Mccandish didn't catch this one since at least 20 years ago. So, its important to fact check these things and not blindly believe everything someone says because, they could be wrong whether intentionally or not. Don't be afraid to do your own research, it can really go a long way to find out things for yourself.

(1967) Provo Utah Ufo Hoax Picture in Black and White Cropped.png

[Gambeir]

And another one.