Ok i did another experiment to do concerning the block wall and dielectric inductance. in the first experiment I have a large area of capacitance through the tube. It is possible that the extra capacitance is drowning out the signal produced by the bloch wall passing through a dielectric. In this experiment i will use a ring of copper tape inside and outside. i made sure the connections were good using ohmmeter. i used a smaller magnet since the big one wont fit becuase of solder connections.
https://youtu.be/Yb_gsNcLPtw
still no voltage change.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I just disproved ken wheelers magnet theories
Collapse
X
-
Wise words from central Kansas.Originally posted by BroMikey View PostI would love to entertain your viewpoints on anything but fortunately for me I see your slanderous and malicious intentions on display on the forum has easily disqualified you as an objective judge, beyond any reasonable doubt.
Almost everyone can see that.
Now what did you say?

Your data collection will need to be based on a more complex line of reasoning and you never have any.
Originally posted by BroMikeyI meant that post for Ernie, He and Burt art still add it. Some folks will always be mainstream thinkers even if the evidence is dishonest or incorrect.
Ernie
I have never heard that before in my entire life!
How do you come up with them!
It was actually another thread (the one on Keshe) that made me search the i-net and find this book review.
Though the book itself seems to be not that good, this review is.
It sure has some good points that make it easier for me to understand what is going on on this forum.
Also, and this one more specifically applies to BroMikey and his above quoted post, it is a well known (and proven) fact that people search for affirmation in others, especially when you are insecure. There for it happens quite often that you think to see in others what is actually in yourself. Projection, this is called.
Let me leave it there. I think you'll get the point.
Now let's just give microwatt a chance here. The fact that he has less posts on this forum than some others does not mean that he is a priori unqualified to disprove a theory. In fact some mega-posters produce nothing but BS.

Ernst.
Leave a comment:
-
attraction due to rotating AETHEROriginally posted by Dingus View Posthis 'dielectric plane' ...he's the one who actually discovered it, ... I personally prefer "Magnetic Equator" myself.
Al
Leave a comment:
-
Hey RamsetOriginally posted by RAMSET View PostThis community has amazing resources [the open source community]
these resources were offered to Ken to substantiate another of his Claims regarding bismuth and heat anomalies [ no interest from him]
We have been completely unable to achieve these results in proper caloric measurement testing.[he is aware of this].
perhaps he can make some suggestions on the test protocol ?
infrared cameras do not Bode well where reflections can occur [his method for the claim]
respectfully
Chet
I really do not understand where all of these various tests will take us but
here is how I look at it. Take a look at the pictures Ken posts on magnets.
Then take a look at the computer generated graphics compiled during the
the lifetime of Howard Johnson AKA (HOJO)
Next take a look at the university level magnet experiment using iron filings
on a piece of glass presented as rock hard evidence for 80 years.
Now you see how I look at Ken's work.
All we need do is look at the early patents using magnetic resonance
imaging and how complex the data spool becomes. You and I have been
lied to from day one. Ken is struggling all alone with what should be more
than just another lie. This is why I welcome your experiment. If you could
post the full spectra of your particular version of proving out this theory
then I am sure others here are intelligent enough to reason it out.
Simply post the measurement technique for our review.
Astrophysics is a branch of space science that applies the laws of physics and chemistry to explain the birth, life and death of stars, planets, galaxies, nebulae and other objects in the universe. It has two sibling sciences, astronomy and cosmology, and the lines between them blur.
Unless people can grasp many forms of so called science and are able
to read between the lines they can never see a proper or valid test
for a process that they have never studied.
Leave a comment:
-
Minor correction; his 'dielectric plane' is the blotch wall. He just likes to use original names for some reason, probably because it makes him feel like he's the one who actually discovered it, that or he named it that before finding out that there was already a name for it & used his own name either out of habit or simply because he likes it better. I personally prefer "Magnetic Equator" myself.Originally posted by microwatt View PostI have carefully watched kens videos on his theory of magnetism. He states that each magnet has a dielectric plane where the bloch wall is.Last edited by Dingus; 11-03-2015, 01:16 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
amazing resources
This community has amazing resources [the open source community]
these resources were offered to Ken to substantiate another of his Claims regarding bismuth and heat anomalies [ no interest from him]
We have been completely unable to achieve these results in proper caloric measurement testing.[he is aware of this].
perhaps he can make some suggestions on the test protocol ?
infrared cameras do not Bode well where reflections can occur [his method for the claim]
respectfully
ChetLast edited by RAMSET; 11-02-2015, 11:57 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry UFO I wasn't talking about you, I hit the wrong reply button.
UFO you are as always, right on. I meant that post for Ernie, He and
Burt art still add it. Some folks will always be mainstream thinkers
even if the evidence is dishonest or incorrect.
Mike Rowland (Central Kansas)
Leave a comment:
-
I based my experiment upon what ken did in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-k8qe0o9SU
At the point 1:31 he said "dielectric inductance"
if there really was dielectric inductance. and energy must be conserved therefore what must be induced is charge.
Leave a comment:
-
Theories are theories. lets see a physical experiment. Just because it sounds beautiful and conforms to your beliefs doesn't mean its true. Just once please
find a way to measure the vorticity of a magnetic field.
Leave a comment:
-
yea your right about the read the book a 1000 times and never understand it. its like quantum right?
maybe he just wants to understand and wants a simple explanation.
no matter how advanced your theory is yuo should be able to explain yourself, simply without resorting to attacks, especially if you think your so right. and kens not known for proving himself. or answering questions. if you act the way you do and say people can read it a 1000 times and not understand it, your sounding like einstein and quantum. and that whole group, or pretend group as it happens to be.Last edited by ldrancer; 11-02-2015, 12:06 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I would love to entertain your viewpoints on anything but fortunately for meOriginally posted by Ernst View PostYou do not need to have read anything about relativity to post here that you have proven Einstein wrong.
You do not need to understand anything about Newton to post here that you have proven him wrong.
You do not need the faintest understand of thermodynamics to post here that you have proven these laws don't apply.
But don't touch our counter-space heroes, such as Kenny.



That is certainly one of the most hilarious things I have read here.
Kenny will respond,
Kenny will try to hurt you, and
Kenny will add numerous references to where he got his knowledge from.

Ernst.
I see your slanderous and malicious intentions on display on the forum has
easily disqualified you as an objective judge, beyond any reasonable doubt.
Almost everyone can see that.
Now what did you say?

Your data collection will need to be based on a more complex line
of reasoning and you never have any.Last edited by BroMikey; 11-02-2015, 07:42 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I respect your abilities on the subject of electronix but other fieldsOriginally posted by microwatt View PostCoils? for one thing lenz's law states .................................
You think my experiment is bunk? Tell me how i should prove kens theories without toys. I have many years of electronic experience and could bould many things.
of inquiry are at stake here. When you go over into what Ken is doing
you have to study astrophysics for about 40 years so you can see
what the line of bull is being spread a foot thick.
I have spent many years of my leisure traveling to library's with book
shelve on many floors. There is so much to know.
There is a gift in each of us that can wade into deep waters where
truth's are mixed in with lies and understand how it got that way.
If you go back and study the metaphysical doctrines of the ages
you will see why men will lie to keep their standing in the scientific
community.
Great thinker pride themselves in being right, this is why books are
full of errors. Why? Because the upper crust of power hungry controller
love to pick and chose their so called adepts to be elevated in the public
eye through media such as your school books.
You and I have been lied to. Ken like all men have gifts, these gifts
come from the gift giver and it is HIS GOOD PLEASURE to watch the
outcome. I state all of these things first before going into electrical
or lines or force because I sense people are irritated with Ken on other
levels that they consider weakness.
We all have faults and I am sure Ken will be the first to agree that he
does not know everything. So if you see a failure in one area try to
find the strong points at the same time.
Ken knows the terminology of the upper level thinker in the scientific
world today and I like the way he redefines those terms to make some
sense out of THEIR gibberish. When I say "THEIR" I mean the lying
controllers. Those who have been running governments for thousands
of years and hide the truth. You will never get the whole truth from
"THEM"
This is why Tesla was buried alive by the media, he went against "THEIR"
truth, the only one YOU know.
I can't tell you how many times sitting in classrooms that a place in the
text was an out right misconception and the teachers could see it too.
One building block made out of a lie is used in the foundation of the
structure to insure that it falls. I think UFO gave you some hints
for a more proper test and even though we don't have Ken's credentials
we can still do experiments to prove or disprove anything.
The Gifts and callings given to men are given to measure them so if you
think Ken is doing something wrong you will need to supply more data.Last edited by BroMikey; 11-02-2015, 07:10 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Dielectric Material Versus Dielectric Plane...
Of course not..."real scientific research" utilizes "iron filings" to "see" magnetic fields...Originally posted by microwatt View PostI respect that he wants to delve into the truth but real scientific research does not use toys such as ferrofluid and magnet field viewers.
Ferrocell, Film Viewer and CRT screening uses Polarized Light to reveal magnetic fields...excuse me but if I remember well, Faraday discovered that magnetic fields and light are directly related...a "while" back, known as the "Faraday Effect".
I don't "think" so...I am sure...You think my experiment is bunk?
And...you could read the same book over and over...a thousand and one times...and still do not understand absolutely nada...which seems to be your case...
What you are "trying" to attack is just your poor interpretation based on a word (dielectric) while ignoring "plane" (which is NOT "material" at all, but means Spatial Geometry) ..So, your "starting point" to "disprove" all the extensive material related to magnetism disclosed by Ken on this Forum does not have any other category but ridiculous.
In ANY part of Ken Wheeler's book, I recall he mentioned Dielectric "Material" existing at the center of every magnet...where the domain wall is...but He refers to a Dielectric Plane.
I could recall "Counter Space" as a cited parallel to Dielectric Plane in a magnet...but then I believe your already bad understanding of Ken's Theory would get even worst.Last edited by Ufopolitics; 11-02-2015, 06:46 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Typical
You do not need to have read anything about relativity to post here that you have proven Einstein wrong.
You do not need to understand anything about Newton to post here that you have proven him wrong.
You do not need the faintest understand of thermodynamics to post here that you have proven these laws don't apply.
But don't touch our counter-space heroes, such as Kenny.
Ken wouldn't want to hurt your feelings.


That is certainly one of the most hilarious things I have read here.
Kenny will respond,
Kenny will try to hurt you, and
Kenny will add numerous references to where he got his knowledge from.

Ernst.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: