Mr Lester J Hendershot's magnetic generator.

[thx1138]

Scalability

Hi thx1138.
...being scalable could of course be used for cores other than Hendershots original size. I hope it is widely shared, with author acknowlegdement of course.

I wouldn't reccomend using it to build different sized coils because it will change the geometry. The reason I mentioned scalability was to make sure that people would get the correct size on their own printer. It should be scaled to 5 15/16" diameter that the dowels are placed on.

I guess it could scaled up or down OK as long as the wire size is scaled appropriately also but using the same size wire on a different sized pattern would change the geometry of the resulting basket weave.

That's why I added the last paragraph in the original post.

I don't need acknowlegdement. Just hope people will build it so it can be figured out.

Still trying to catch up on the previous posts in this thread. I'll be there soon.

[GSM]

The attached PDF is a template to be printed out and used for marking points for the dowels in the coil. Use a thumb tack in the center point and another thumb tack somewhere in the periphery to keep it from rotating. Then take a punch or nail and mark the center of each dowel, remove the template, and drill the dowel holes.

When printing, make sure it is printed at 100% and landscape. Check the diameter of the printed image and adjust the PDF scaling if necessary. It worked OK for me as is but I've only tested it on one printer.

This is generated by a computer program so if you need a different diameter and/or #of dowels PM me with an email address, the dowel center to center diameter, dowel diameter, and # dowels and I'll change the parameters to generate another one.

Hi thx1138.

http://www.energeticforum.com/attachments/renewable-energy/13831d1382279383-mr-lester-j-hendershots-magnetic-generator-5-15-16ths.pdf

That is an excellent piece of artwork, and being scalable could of course be used for cores other than Hendershots original size. I hope it is widely shared, with author acknowlegdement of course.

I have before mentioned an Fe > Mn > Fe > Mn ............ oscillation at atomic level via magnetic induction of electron spin-axis rotation causing electron capture.

I also mentioned likely neutrino involvement due to the Fe > Mn isotope having very similar mass, with possible free space neutrino involvement related Mn > Fe recovery and Beta emission.

My thoughts are thus because the aluminium overwind in the Hendershot will develop charge as it transduces any Beta or X-ray region photonic output from the base iron centre core into an electrical feedback for the 4th winding. Manganese and iron are closely related, thus the also magnetic manganese isotope is a likely stepping stone for perfectly tuned atomic oscillation within an iron based magnetic field.

http://www.energeticforum.com/attachments/renewable-energy/13832d1382347493-donald-smith-devices-too-good-true-positron-electron-capture.jpg

We are taught about electron capture and K capture, but never about any reverse activity, and yet there is absolutely no reason why this cannot happen within the internal atomic gravityational relationships within domain spun magnetic fields, still with energy release due to the constant neutrino flux availability.

Electron - Proton Interaction

What is positron capture

I'm still waiting for coils etc. to be delivered, and it took me four hours to find my geiger counter after a new cold water tank had been installed in the roof space. No hurry though !

Cheers ........... Graham.

[thx1138]

Template for coil

The attached PDF is a template to be printed out and used for marking points for the dowels in the coil. Use a thumb tack in the center point and another thumb tack somewhere in the periphery to keep it from rotating. Then take a punch or nail and mark the center of each dowel, remove the template, and drill the dowel holes.

When printing, make sure it is printed at 100% and landscape. Check the diameter of the printed image and adjust the PDF scaling if necessary. It worked OK for me as is but I've only tested it on one printer.

This is generated by a computer program so if you need a different diameter and/or #of dowels PM me with an email address, the dowel center to center diameter, dowel diameter, and # dowels and I'll change the parameters to generate another one.

[GSM]

More Disinfo.

I recently showed this link -

http://library.liberaenergio.org/files/-%20Free%20Energy/Lester%20J%20Hendershot/Hendershot_in_Farbe.doc

However I just realised that this representation also includes disinfo.

Everyone here - do save youselves a copy of this - these are photographs of the last 'known-to-operate' device examined.

So what was done to it to throw everyone off ?
They made out that there was a third core-cap connection or photos deceive ?

Look at the foils supposedly coming out from between the breadboard and the windings -
'Supposedly' these are from an assembled core-cap element foil as it is lowered into an already wound coil-set ?
How on earth could anyone manage this ?
Also, how come those foils appear pristine when all else around is marked from reconnections ?

To me those foils were either pushed in beneath the windings before the photographs were taken, and thus before Crusty diligently traced them out as part of his new circuit diagram;
or only photographic parallax makes them appear as shown.

They are not additional capacitor winding connections.

The only capacitance present here would be that between the Fe core and the Al overwind, and that would not change from the 7.8nF quoted, no matter how many insulated turns of Al foil were used to capture the circumferential spin cycle energisation of Fe released Beta emission.

Thus to me the only question here relates to foil thickness and how many turns are required in order to capture all of Beta emission, whereafter coincidental field energisation of Auger electron avalanches within the foil could increase the electron charge, which is then used as positive feedback to maintain both oscillation and output.

The third capacitor on Crusty's drawing in this link does not exist, though a core connection is conceivable in order to initiate oscillation.

Cheers ............. Graham.

[GSM]

Watch out for DISINFO !!!!!

From Ed Skilling - A Story of Free Energy - August 1962. Original page 20.

The Capacitors C1 and C2 are the most difficult to build .....
The foil from two capacitors Pyramid electrolytic TM58 must be removed ......
A TM58 capacitor should measure, including foil and paper, 91+1/8 long and 2+3/4 in. wide.
Wipe off excess electrolytic .....
One side of the paper holding the foil will be full length, the opposite side will be split with terminal connections appearing at each end of the split portion.
The capacitors that were used in the early experiments had a gap between the split foil of 3/4 of an inch.
After insulating the cylinders, wrap the capacitor foil and paper around each of the cylinders.
Start at one end with the long unsplit foil on the inside and wrap the full length onto the cylinder.

"capacitor foil and paper" singular !!!!!
Drawing shows two 'Original terminals of capacitor.'

If the correct tensions were applied while wrapping the capacitor paper and foil, the measured capacity should be 0.0078uF.

NOT ANYWHERE does it state to wind more than the single long foil plus paper.
NOT ANYWHERE is there mention of any other capacitance value.
That 7.8nF is the cylinder to foil value I estimated yesterday.
One of the re-used solder tags clearly went directly to the cylinder as per the photo in Post#387 above !

Short circuits of the capacitor will render the results useless ....

This would short out the winding fields before they could energise the sleeve core.

For accuracy the capacitors should be measured with a reliable capacitor bridge.
(for balance between flip-flopping magnetic pulse energised core-cap assemblies)

I have suggested that the Fe of the sleevecore is magnetic field induced to emit beta radiation.
Beta radiaction meeting aluminium foil will generate a potential with respect to source.
Connection of the sleeve core and aluminium foil terminals to a positively phased feedback winding will ........


The Art of Lying is to not tell lies,
but to create 'truth' using half-TRUTHs !

So be careful whose 'truth's you BELIEVE,
and figure out why you were told them !

GSM: March 2013.


Cheers .............. Graham.

[GSM]

I obtained the information from the Net and Built it accordingly:

Three things needs clarification:

Can any body please help with some better photos.

Hi Macfire,

Don't let the *CON MERCHANTS* take advantage of your mind again.

Three things ? If only ! Even people who possess devices that once worked can't get them to run again.
No one is known to have built a functional Hendershot generator since Lester died over 50 years ago.

If you want 'free energy' follow Akula and Kapanadze via YouTube !!!

Otherwise good info and photos here -

http://www.rexresearch.com/hendershot2/FromArchivesLJH.pdf

http://library.liberaenergio.org/files/-%20Free%20Energy/Lester%20J%20Hendershot/Hendershot_in_Farbe.doc

Much more is available, but be on the watchout for wilful disinfo repeated by those who do not understand.
Also ignore anyone attemting to explain/study this via the use of circuit simulators;

Lester's Magnatronic Generator did NOT run via any published/software translatable "scientific" process !!!

Cheers ................. Graham.

[MACFIRE]

Hendershot Fuel Less Generator

I urgently need advice on the building of the Hendershot Generator.

I obtained the information from the Net and Built it accordingly:

Three things needs clarification:

1. Would the use of 6mm dowl sticks instead of 3mm dowls sticks prevent the machine from working.
2. What is the correct rating of the transformers to be used? In the manual it only said 1/5 ratio but nothing about the VA rating. I am using 2x 500VA rated transformers and need to know if this is far to big and if so what should the correct VA rating be to make the unit work?
3. The Video of the build is **** to say the least thus leaving me to guess the correct wiring of the unit according the circuit diagram. Can any body please help with some better photos.

[GSM]

Getting back here from the Don Smith thread (I gave up in that thread last year, and ditto this!), where I have shared ideas related to my understanding of the Hendershot device with its similarly opposing magnetic fields;

opposing electron spin orbit alignments induce a floating skin effect within magnetic centre core region domains which become re-aligned with induced resultant circumferential field rotation (in Hendershot this is induced via capacitor induced phase shift in a near centre winding, and not via a spark gap impulse) -

the mechanical central skin domain region electron orbit motions are like those demonstrated in this clever ring based construction video I just came across -

https://youtube.googleapis.com/v/NI2N6fsPjjg

electrons are induced to circumnavigate backwards and forwards in alternating spin waves at output frequency like little gyroscopes, and thereby have imposed upo them atomic orbit-breaking forces as illustrated here -
Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel - YouTube

such that they collide with other core nucleii with electron capture = Fe to Mn isotope transmutation (near identical atomic weight) and Beta release, also collide with other electrons to release Auger electron avalanches, with Auger electrons also amenable to field acceleration and direction.

In Post#387 above I included a photograph showing a left core-cap with a tag making direct electrical connection with the inner ferrous core.
I also indicated my puzzlement at the stated capacitance values for Hendershot's hand wound capacitors wound directly over that centre core. Different capacitance values have been quoted, but there is no way the 96" long by 2.75" wide element mentioned could have had a capacitance value as low as the 7.8nF.

I was going to construct my own tin can capacitor overwind and measure with a capacitance meter, but do not have any of the 'pure Kraft paper' and a tin can the same size as Lester used and as was stated in original notes.

Hence I decided to use a web based capacitance calculator -
Tesla Coils - Capacitance Calculator

An inner core 5.25" dia. gives a length of 16.5", by 2.75 inches high for width.
For Kraft paper and first insulation layer I have estimated a 5 thou plate spacing.
For dielectric constant I have estimated and entered 3.5.
When the number of platesis 2, and the dimensions are in inches,
the estimated capacitance of the first core-cap turn came out as 0.007139uF.

Clearly this is in the ballpark of 7.8nF, and PROVES that the centre core itself must have been circuit connected, for otherwise, and without its own tag connection, that figure would not even have been measureable.

So were there other capacitor elements, if yes what for, and how were they really connected ?

Cheers ................ Graham.

[GSM]

Tesla car -

How was speed controlled? What was connected to the gas pedal?

Tubes were oscillator. Throttle controlled frequency over a working rev range.
Car had clutch and gearbox, and possible different rear axle gearing.

He {Harold Aspden} basically is saying, in regard to your work, that the energy released in the Fe->Mn transition is stored in the aether and when the aether equalizes its energy level, the energy from the Fe->Mn transition that was absorbed by the aether is fed back into the Mn->Fe transition.

RE aether: Where does an energy "field" store its energy? What medium is storing that energy?

Intra-nucleus relationships with orbiting electrons ARE the storage of energy in space-time; whilst gravity/ electric charge/ magnetics balance those energies within and around atoms/ matter.
Isotopes have typical lifetimes before retaining stability via action from the all pervasive neutrino flux, which is not a field but a constant flow from nuclear reactions within stars/ Sun etc.

The Aether has been deemed an essential medium, even reactive, or reflective; but neutrinos are atomic particles, which are none of those, nor some kind of field either.

Thus where any atom might emit a neutrino, this has nothing to do with the donation of a neutrino from somewhere else, for they are not stored in any 'Aether' and then returned.

Yet when I mention to him that the movement of an electron never stops and is therefore perpetual motion, he's stumped.

BRAVO !

Cheers ................... Graham.

[thx1138]

Rethinking gospel

Re your Tesla (top ten) link, strange that there was no mention of his Pierce Arrow energy box !

There's really not much to say about the box. The tubes that are stated to have been used didn't exist until much later and the whole story is shaky enough to make it dubious at best. One thing that has always bothered me about it was the statement about the "normal" auto controls being used. How was speed controlled? What was connected to the gas pedal? Nary a hint in all the info I've seen.

Have come to Harold Aspden discussing the Aether, and that is a turn-off before I start.

That's too bad. He basically is saying, in regard to your work, that the energy released in the Fe->Mn transition is stored in the aether and when the aether equalizes its energy level, the energy from the Fe->Mn transition that was absorbed by the aether is fed back into the Mn->Fe transition.

I have a friend that has been a ham operator for over 50 years and he has the same problems with over unity and perpetual motion. He can't kick all that previous radio training either. It is his gospel. Yet when I mention to him that the movement of an electron never stops and is therefore perpetual motion, he's stumped.

It tickles me how many times on these forums the posters are looking for "alternative energy sources" and trying to find them through conventional thinking. They start off with a new idea and immediately revert to conventional thinking citing Maxwell, et al and it never seems to go anywhere except around in circles. And these are usually the same people who think that knowledge and inventions are being suppressed but won't look at alternative explanations. It's like pounding a square peg into a round hole.

RE aether: Where does an energy "field" store its energy? What medium is storing that energy?

[GSM]

Stainless steel can be magnetic or non-magnetic depending on how it is manufactured. This would relate to your surface spin idea. The following link explains the atomic structure of the two different types. The second paragraph is of interest. I'm not far along enough to know if this would impact your work but thought I would mention it.
Why don't magnets work on some stainless steels?

Just catching up myself thx1138.
Apart from helping out at my son's house I had been sharing ideas on the Don Smith thread, but I need to get back here.

Re your Tesla (top ten) link, strange that there was no mention of his Pierce Arrow energy box ! I think that what we read depends upon who is publishing !

Thank you for that stainless steel link. At least someone else writes about rotating magnetic domiains, so I feel less of a lone beacon.
Magnetism is an alignment of electron orbits, thus rotating magnetic domains means rotating the axes of the electron orbits within matter in response to an external field.
Then when taking this another step forwards, spinning the magnetic field causes the electron orbit axes to spin as well, this inducing considerable forces upon individual electrons within domains.

Morpher has already made many video based examinations of the Hendershot generator, but I am not aware of him examining a completed construction, which, now that I understand what I am supposed to be achieving, I am going to try for myself, even down to the level of winding/construsting my own magnetic induction (buzzer) assembly.

Still not read your earlier links yet. Have come to Harold Aspden discussing the Aether, and that is a turn-off before I start.
I lived an early diet of radio/electronics and knew the 2" thick RSGB manual inside out before I realised that there was misguidance regarding fields and EM propagation.
Hence before I do more reading I need to do some measurements on the capacity value for foil over a tin can, especially since I posted that last photo of *the central tin can sleeve core core carrying an electrical connection*.
Was the 7,800pF a can to long aluminium foil value ?
Then 1.3uF the value between the short lengths ?
Again something has been most inadequately explained here, especially if the foil is transducing either beta or photonic emissions from the can/ stainless steel sleeve core and feeding that energy back into the circuit to maintain oscillation and output.

Cheers ............... Graham.

[thx1138]

Rotating magnetic field

The year 1928 is interesting as it is related to the Hendershot device. The following is from a 1928 interview with Tesla:
"Toward the end of the interview, we asked Tesla which arena of science most appealed to him. While we expected him to mention radios and airplanes, Tesla answered that rotating magnetic fields were dear to his heart. 'A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.'" Full article at the following link
Archive Gallery: 10 Renowned Scientists Make Their PopSci Debut

Do the basket weave coils have a rotating magnetic field that sloshes the charge around in the internally mounted capacitors and so change the charge density?

[thx1138]

Solar Wind Prediction web site

I decided to go back to the beginning of this thread and work forward to catch up on what I've missed so it's been a while since I posted. I'm starting page 7 now. Also doing some work on my daughter's house so my posts might be few and far between for a while.

That Solar Wind Prediction web site is a very cool animation. I've been looking at space weather in regards to Tesla's Radiant Energy collector and have found some interesting results. The major problem I'm having now is grasping the entire dynamic picture. That site shows the charged particles of the solar wind but that's just one aspect of what is going on dynamically. There's also the magnetic fields associated with charged particles and overall the light being emitted by the sun at the same time. The thing I noticed is that there is an inverse correlation between the solar wind and the charge on my radiant energy collector - the higher the density of the solar wind charged particles, the lower the received charge. One would think it should be opposite of that but I realized all of that matter being cast off by the sun is diffusing or absorbing some of the light energy being emitted. The correlation I did was with X-rays and it was fairly close but out of 50+ observations there were a few outliers that didn't fit the curve so I guess there are other aspects to consider also.

There's a lot of current and historical space weather info at the following link and the links in that page.
SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids

But to grasp the whole dynamic picture you also have to show the earth revolving around the sun and rotating on its axis at the same time and the varying magnetic field of the earth generated by the Coriolis effect whirls in the liquid iron outer core. And then throw the magnetic, electrical, and gravity properties of the sun, earth, moon, and other planets and their moons into the picture and it gets truly mind numbing. At least for me. Of course you can go further out like galaxies and cosmic rays, etc and further in to the molecular and atomic levels. That's how I view the universe, both macro and micro. An infinitely variable fractal on all scales. I got into fractals and chaos theory back in the 90's and decided there is no such thing as chaos. Everything has a pattern given the proper perspective. Simply put, if chaos was the fundamental property of the universe then organization of matter and energy could not exist.

The solar wind animation triggered something in my brain and I went back to look at Tesla's turbine and those spiral shapes also represent the path taken by the working fluid across the disks in the turbine. There are some interesting statements in his patent:

"The subject of this application is an invention pertaining to the art of imparting energy to fluids..." (the solar wind, the atmosphere and any plasma, for that matter, can be considered a fluid); and "...the particles of the fluid..." (particle accelerator?)

And I had a thought about pumping a magneic fluid with a Tesla turbine, the disks being conductive or pumping a conductive fluid and the disks being magnetic. I'm getting a bit far afield here.

Back to Hendershot. In reading the prior posts I noted a few things that might shed some light although you may have already covered them. I haven't caught up all the way.

Stainless steel can be magnetic or non-magnetic depending on how it is manufactured. This would relate to your surface spin idea. The following link explains the atomic structure of the two different types. The second paragraph is of interest. I'm not far along enough to know if this would impact your work but thought I would mention it.
Why don't magnets work on some stainless steels?

Another thing that crossed my mind was parametric oscillation which is, as I understand it, is a non-linear output effect of changing charge density in a capacitive device, meaning a small change in density can make a large change in output in a non-linear fashion. Might this apply to the capacitor positioned in the center of the basket weave coils, the charge density reacting to the oscillations of the magnetic field?

Which brings me to the subject of "magnetic reconnection" which apparently generates energy spikes that may draw extra energy from the medium of the environment. I'll leave that for you to search because I need to get back to work on my daughter's house.

[GSM]

Hi thx1138.

Thank you for your PDF text with final synopsis.

My thoughts are as yours/ Tesla's.

In this regard the Hendershot generator sleeve was (via a magnetic vortex) being induced to emit radioactively. The sleeve was wrapped by an insulator, then a metal (aluminium) collector around that, which developed charge as it stopped the emitted particles.
This alternating charge was then phase shifted via coil resonance and fed back to intensify the magnetic vortex, which was additionally increased via the external load current simultaneously passing through the vortex generating windings.

Did Hendershot get there before Tesla, or did Hendershot become priveledged to Tesla information after his magnetic motor empowered the Spirit of St Louis aeroplane flight across the Atlantic except for a conventionally fueled take-off ?

Will check out your other links now, starting with Tutorial Lessons.
Again; Thank You !

Cheers ................. Graham.

[GSM]

I have attached what I have written up on Tesla's work on radiant energy. It still needs work. Hopefully it will trigger some thoughts for you.

Re Patent age 44.
These notes have an identical basis to those published by Gustav LeBon in his 'Evolution of Matter' book ! (I think 1907) If you read this text you will very quickly realise that this is not only about the evolution of matter, but the basis for the atomic devolution of matter, and that this be possible via EM at frequencies exceeding UV-C.

This of course being where we can cause the very atoms of matter, via their electrons, to become the initiating source of UV>X-ray frequencies within an arrangement of surroundings.

Gustav measured the 'wavelengths' of UV light via electric arc and different types of quartz filters, plus used his electroscope to measure/tabulate the charge effects upon sheet aluminium, plus many other materials including tin and zinc.

He found that what we now call UV-A had a small effect, UV-B more, UV-5 more still and frequencies beyond even greater.
He reported that in outside daylight the aluminium charge disturbance measured by electroscope deflection increased with sunlight and lack of clouds, but he also noted changes of reading which were beyond those explainable by visually observable conditions ! Cosmic rays/ neutrinos ?

Hendershot !!!!!

Cheers ................... Graham.

txh1138 I am so very busy at present, so it will take me some time to get to all of those links in your post above.
You can see how little I have progressed through your own paper. Thanks.

I do hope that other subscribers and visitors here read through your work and all of the recommended links in this thread too.