High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy

[Mad Scientist]

Yes a video or some pictures would be nice. All the theory in the world proves nothingpossibly work.

But a real live working model one that can be closely examined and reproduced by others

So I have a simple yes or no question. Have you already built and tested an actual working model?

[bradagilah]

Yes a video or some pictures would be nice. All the theory in the world proves nothingpossibly work.

But a real live working model one that can be closely examined and reproduced by others

So I have a simple yes or no question. Have you already built and tested an actual working model?

Yes I have. And I am getting setup to film. But my idea of getting setup to film is not in two hours or by tomorrow... I am working on a timeline of two weeks to a month. As some of the skeptics on other forums have requested that I used multiple cameras, and get setup in a very specific way.

[Dave45]

Chas Campbell Free Energy Generator - YouTube

[leely1]

I have seen people power alternator with a dc motor, though it works but lasted for 8hrs or less. I have seen one that did it well, and could last for 24hrs, still with dc motor and alternator. one thing good about it is that it has amps, it can carry tv, it can carry video. If u people can conduct experiments based on this area, I'm sure u people will get the same results my young man did

[garrys]

gen specs posted on ats board

You could save us all a lot of time and effort by just telling everyone the exact brand and model number of the generator you gave specs for on the ats board since 1291 watts for every horsepower of input is already more than anyone here could ever want.

"Also, the generator I provided specs on, produces, 1291 watts per horsepower, and again, these ratings are from an ISO 9000:1 certified manufacture."

quoted from 2 thirds down the page at :

High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy, page 1

I found this most amusing in a post that started with "lol. I like this part. This is where having a background in electrical engineering would help you all. Otherwise it's your Achilles heal."

Garry

[bradagilah]

I made a mistake in my calculations... none of this works... sorry guys. move on.

[jimboot]

I made a mistake in my calculations... none of this works... sorry guys. move on.

Can you tell us where the mistake was in the calculation? Or how you made the mistake? I'm sure a lot of us would find that helpful. Hopefully no one in a black hat is standing next to you as you wrote the above

[one_christian_warrior]

one_christian_warrior, what you do discribe is not discovered, because usual the transmission from power is usual a 1:1 Ratio minus losses.

One Question, your chair has a Motor in what charge the Batteries?

JOE- ? the late 80s Quickie P200 has 2 motors in the back,
JOE- these motors both movie the chair, and act as breaks, through electrical means

I been thinking about your Story too, but i found a hook there. When you charge your Batteries with a second motor, when its in idle or downhill, then it happens with the Power from gravity and the weight with the Chair,
not with the Power from the Batterie alone or with a Flywheel, what drives only the Generator.

Its another Force, what you do need to add, when you want to calculate it, even when you need more Power to drive uphill. Not sure, how this comes out but mostly negative at the transmission factor.

JOE- ?

For emailing the Gouvernment, i would not do that, mainly they are not interested, probatly speak with a Person there, what really wanna invest into a Idea, but else it is waste of Time. And even more wasted at higher Offices.

JOE- I agree with you here
JOE- what a waste of time this was

[citfta]

He made several mistakes. I explained in post #8 in this thread he mixed up 3 phase input power and output power. He claimed the motor data for horsepower was for a single phase. A motor is NOT rated that way. The rated output power is for all phases combined. Also his formula for input power was wrong. He was including the power correction factor in the input power formula. According to all sites I checked on calculating motor input power the power factor is not included in the input power calculations. He also did not include the motor efficiency in the output power of the motor. The correct formulas for a single phase motor are: Input power = V x I , for output power it is V x I x PF x Eff. He also made claims that a multiphase generator is rated for each phase which I am pretty sure is also incorrect although after seeing what a mess he made of the motor calculations I didn't bother to check.

Can you tell us where the mistake was in the calculation? Or how you made the mistake? I'm sure a lot of us would find that helpful. Hopefully no one in a black hat is standing next to you as you wrote the above

Respectfully,
Carroll

[Mad Scientist]

But a real live working model one that can be closely examined and reproduced by others

So I have a simple yes or no question. Have you already built and tested an actual working model?

Yes I have. And I am getting setup to film. But my idea of getting setup to film is not in two hours or by tomorrow...

[Joit]

Joe, its not discovered, or done, (maybe some did build something like that at a try, but not public) because usual when you think about it, you dont come to a positive Result.

The Force from Gravity, what drags a Weight down uphill is equal to the Force, what you win, when a Weight rolls downhill. Without thinking at other losses, what are in a System with bearings and transmissions.
If it would be otherwise, a Pendulum would swing faster and faster, when you set it in motion, because it should win Energy each time when it swings down.

Another Reason can be, that the Batteries are been sulfated, and with the higher Current from breaking, they did better charge up as they been.
Or even, that the charge system in the Breaks work better then the Charger on the Grid, like gives the Batteries better power.

But anyway, i dont know if its possible, the Watson motor runs with a heavy flywheel too, and few others do use one too. The Inventor from a DAF (Dutch Car) developed a Car with a big Flywheel and claimed, that it does not need any Fuel, but the Car itself came later of course with depending on Gas, but at last, it could drive backwards same fast as forward. Someone should rebuild it and play with it, but i guess any Technican just yawns about that.

But at last, there are more Factors, a Flywheel (what is a mechanical Capcitor), 2 Motors, a Voltage Regulator, (with Capacitors), and big Capacitors - the Batteries.