Originally Posted by goldsphere

Well it seems a simple thing to replicate.
Eight coils wound like the Cook device in series around central coil on core.

Originally Posted by Allcanadian

@teslaproject

I would agree we should look at the facts and maybe we could start with the present day beliefs in physics. Today they believe gravity is an attractive force between masses but they have no credible explanation for what gravity "is" only what it does. Today they believe a magnetic field is magical virtual photons which magically pop into and out of existence from multiple alternate universes, again they have no idea what a magnetic field "is" only what it does. Today they say particles such as electrons have a negaitive charge but they still have absolutely no idea where this "charge" came from or why it exists. In fact we have no more idea about how much of anything really works in nature fundamentally, as a fact, than we did 100 years ago in Tesla's time.


Was Tesla wrong -- clearly? I see very little that is clear in any sense of the word. What we are told is that mass and energy are conserved and we are also told that all matter is continually absorbing and radiating what we call energy. Now if matter is continually absorbing and radiating "energy" then where does this "energy" come from?
In any case I think your theory that a radioactive material absorbing energy from an external source should keep emitting energy forever is flawed because it assumes the radiation of energy/mass can have no effect on the mass over time.
Regards
AC

Originally Posted by Allcanadian

@boguslaw


Oh dear it sounds like there's trouble in wunderland, I wonder what their going to do when they find out radioactivity in an object can be neutralized in a matter of hours, lol. You know it's getting harder and harder to believe anything mainstream science preaches anymore. The egomaniacs get up on their soapbox and tell us this is the way it is and this is how it must be because science say's so and if you don't believe us then you must be stupid or delusional. Then when they find their facts which were supposedly written in stone by the hand of god are not entirely true then they just say-- well that's science-- as if they had some credibility. I think when people stop treating science like a form of religion we will finally start learning things we never could have imagined.
Thanks for the link
Regards
AC

Elaborating the Neoplatonist picture. Agrippa accepts the basic Neoplatonic framework sketched above. God has the Forms in his mind. God created "Angelical and Celestial secondary causes," beings Agrippa also calls the "Intelligences," and God "gives the seal of His Ideas to the Intelligences." The Intelligences then use the "heavens and stars as instruments" to send these copies of the Forms down to humans on the Earth. In exactly the way our souls/intellects control our bodies, the Intelligences -- the Celestial souls -- control the body (=the matter) of the universe. So just as my mind "sends commands" to my body in order for the mind to achieve its aims, so too do the Intelligences/ celestial souls use the stars to achieve their ends. Thus Agrippa agrees with Avicen[na], who says "whatever things are done here, must have been before in the motions and conceptions of the stars and orbes." Agrippa says that "quintessence" -- Aristotle's 5th element, aither -- is what conveys the Intelligences' power to material stuffs: the spirit is contained in "the rays of the stars."

Originally Posted by wrtner

...not forgetting that the cores need to be iron (not steel) and that
there are LR circuits here which need to run at resonance.

Originally Posted by goldsphere

What proof do you have of this? Steel is 99.8% iron, so I don't see your point.

Originally Posted by MonsieurM

you could email the newspaper asking where to go for microfilm access to their archives.

Originally Posted by wrtner

The point is that iron sheds its magnetism quickly when the power
to its coil is removed. With steel, there is a lag. It is in the original
writings.

As for resonance, you will need to see for yourself.

Originally Posted by goldsphere

If that is the case then ferrite would be the ideal thing to use.

Originally Posted by boguslaw

Any news ?

Originally Posted by boguslaw

Hi

I ask somebody located near Seattle to dig into archive of
The Post-Intelligencer (Seattle WA) for article from Thursday, July 29, 1920 about Hubbard generator. Please if you could find every possible copy of this article and resolve two most important words in it.

Originally Posted by AetherScientist

As you can see in the schematics and some pictures of the hendershot transformer, it really looks like a Tesla coil but instead of having one secondary it has multiple secondaries.

Have anyone heard about someone that had used more than 1 secondaries in a Tesla coil? You know that there are different techniques to use the output energy from a Tesla coil secondary. A lot of people used it to make big sparks, but you can perform work with it.


My question right now is....
A ferrite rod (that acts like the core of the transformer) can act as a core? If I apply Pulsating DC in the primary, can I get dc or AC in the secondary?

Originally Posted by boguslaw

For hydro-device I see only 3 solutions :

1. Capacitors were still charged but without electrons between capacitors plates
2. Device operation and oil flow were synchronized and replacement of oil between capacitors plates were done to avoid Len'z law in precise moment of electrical switching
3. Oil stored charge (electrons) and the amount of them accumulated over time. After some period of time capacitors were charged continously !?

Originally Posted by shawnnweed

the two words are "house light-ing" circuit. It was smeared but I had another person verify with me and we both concur.

Originally Posted by shawnnweed

Yeah, it's not problem. I was in the Seattle are anyway. I called the newspaper, which is no longer a newspaper. They seem to only run online ads now. They referred me to the Central Seattle Public Library. I called them and they sent me to the historical section on the 9th floor at 1000 4th Ave. It's amazing the whole building, all ten floors, is one big library. I talked to the side desk and they sent me to a microfilm machine with the entire month of July 1920. They had new machines so it was microfilm and not micro fische. I went to the end and of the film and read the article. I had to use light enhancements and magnification to read it. However, it was still discernable. The article said that the entire thing was only 11 inches by 14 inches and put out something like 120 volts and 230 amps. He hooked it to a boat engine and ran the boat at ten knots. The article said that the entire thing was inert until he touchedfor a few seconds with a common house lighti-ing circuit. This reminded me of John hutchinson using a 12 volt dc adapter, with the wires cut, to polarize his crystal cells. 12 volts causes 1 volts. I have a feeling that both John's used higher voltage and amperage to polarize both of their batteries in a 12 to 1 ratio. But that is just a guess. However, not an unfounded guess.
,Shawn