Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #241  
Old 06-29-2011, 05:15 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multipier 2011

Hello World,
Like you I’m a dreamer of a better future.
Obviously through free energy, things would be a lot different.
No more wars for gasoline and petrol. No more polluting planet earth.
But the system maintaining the profits out of controlled energy is way more organized than one could ever possibly imagine. Just take a minute and think of all the interests that would be affected if people had free energy.
Now think that the source of free energy is Gravity. As Mr. tutanka says about Mr. chalkalis’s invention.
In a world that science is improving and old facts are proven wrong or obsolete every day, we are still so absolute about some things.
Newton (1643 – 1727) described universal gravitation and the three laws of motion, which dominated the scientific view of the physical universe for the next three centuries… (Wikipedia)
For your consideration I will mention that The first electric bulb light was made in 1800 by Humphry Davy. In my humble opinion he would have probably been accused of using witchcraft in 17th century.
A year ago I found out about Mr. F.M.chalkalis Energy Multiplier and since then I’m following its course.
Today, with the help of many people we actually have the scientific documentation that proves Mr. Chalkalis claims of Over-Unity.
Proofs, that should make us reconsider or knowledge on physics we have been taught.
Yet, I see none saying a word about it.
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #242  
Old 09-18-2011, 04:28 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Hello World,
Keeping my promise on informing you of any news on F.M.Chalkalis Energy multiplier, I would like to bring to your attention the following letter that was posted on Mr Chalkalis page about two week ago.

Link: F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER Friday, September 9, 2011.

Read and decide on your own.
After all, it is a responsibility and obligation to our children to keep our minds open and decide for our own what is truth.

W32

“Un-Learning is a fundamental requirement of Innovative Thinking.”
A.Kerkar
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 10-09-2011, 06:41 PM
knovos knovos is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
No serious replications yet seen on this forum. The design of Mr. Chalkalis is probable to big for most of us, but why not trying to replicate it on a smaller scale ?!. You can get all his drawings on his blog F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER
I'm going to try to replicate his device using his specifications, as much as possible, for the materials I have available. I am sick and tired of all the thoughts and math discussions, mixing it sometimes with other devices. Lets build the damn thing and see what comes out. Then we have something to discuss. So, now you all can sit back and wait for me. If I fail, I will accept the title 'loser' no problem.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 10-15-2011, 05:16 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Dear Knovos,
Since you are following the F.M.Chalkalis thread, you must already know I am a supporter, because I honestly believe it can change our world. Unfortunately I do not have the ability to build a copy myself.
Reading your post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by knovos View Post
No serious replications yet seen on this forum. The design of Mr. Chalkalis is probable to big for most of us, but why not trying to replicate it on a smaller scale ?!. You can get all his drawings on his blog F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER
I'm going to try to replicate his device using his specifications, as much as possible, for the materials I have available. I am sick and tired of all the thoughts and math discussions, mixing it sometimes with other devices. Lets build the damn thing and see what comes out. Then we have something to discuss. So, now you all can sit back and wait for me. If I fail, I will accept the title 'loser' no problem.
i would like to add that:
As long it concerns smaller scale devices (smaller weights), you should read of Mr.Chalkalis ‘s advices on the mater.
Concerning the possibility you may be called a “loser” as you say, I would like to encourage you that if you follow the instructions and specifications firmly it would be impossible to fail.
Even more, if you google it you will find that there are confirmations from Universities about Mr. F.M.Chalkalis device functionality and even technical data tablet with COP based on the prototype.
I have been studying this innovation for quite a time and I would be more than happy to contribute in your try with any help you might need.
The responsibility of proving that the F.M.Chalkalis device can be successfully copied is of great importance and I do wish you lots of strength.
PS.: You should build an enchased base and underpinned foundations because the forces are huge.

My Best Wishes
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 10-15-2011, 08:33 PM
gassplitter's Avatar
gassplitter gassplitter is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5
Dear W32,

Thank you very much for your encouragement. Yes I know you are a big fan of mister Chalkalis his device. And yes, I have read as much as I can about all the information that for building this device. This evening I made a start by making the first drawing for the smaller scale replication. I decided to make a replication that is 25% from the original. My first concerns are how to make two weights each 5711 gram and the motors that I want to use, maybe they are not strong enough. But that are problems that can be solved I'm sure. This device is really simple to build but it must be accurate in the dimensions. Yes the forces will be huge so maybe thats the reason why Mr.Chalkalis did not used bearings. Bearings are no problem I think as long as they are build for the forces. I really don't understand why there are no serious replications yet. Talk to you later.
Kind regards,
Knovos.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 10-17-2011, 09:28 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Dear Knovos or gasspliter,
I was really happy to hear your initial declaration about replicating F.M.Chalkalis‘s devise following the original specifications as you said. Now I read you decided to make a replication that is 25% from the original.
Allow me to say that I got some doubts… but I do wish you good luck.
regards
w32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 10-25-2011, 08:49 PM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Chalkalis Replication pics

Hi all, just to let you know, I posted some pics here at overunity.com. I go by ae_vector in that forum.

Chalkalis Gravity Wheel

-brian
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 10-31-2011, 12:17 AM
ashtweth's Avatar
ashtweth ashtweth is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,499
Send a message via Skype™ to ashtweth
Chalkalis Energy Multiplier Replication Initial Hand Spin - YouTube
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 10-31-2011, 07:50 AM
Stephen Brown's Avatar
Stephen Brown Stephen Brown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 119
A thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by n84dafun View Post
Hi all, just to let you know, I posted some pics here at overunity.com. I go by ae_vector in that forum.

Chalkalis Gravity Wheel

-brian
Hey Brian,
Here in California we use plywood as sheer-paneling for earthquakes.
Instead of more 2 X 6s try using plywood cut to the O.D. of the frame and nail it along the outside of the frame.
This will strengthen it substantially.
Just a thought.
Stephen
__________________
Potential, is a terrible thing to waste.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 10-31-2011, 08:34 AM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Brown View Post
Hey Brian,
Here in California we use plywood as sheer-paneling for earthquakes.
Instead of more 2 X 6s try using plywood cut to the O.D. of the frame and nail it along the outside of the frame.
This will strengthen it substantially.
Just a thought.
Stephen
Great idea Stephen! For now I need the front and back open for easier prototyping, but eventually the plywood idea is something that I'll use for the final build. Thanks for the tip.

-brian
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #251  
Old 10-31-2011, 10:12 AM
Duncan's Avatar
Duncan Duncan is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,329
Just watching ...

Not working on this but very Interested and following, No comment but just a point that caught my attention 1st is Mr Chalkalis's device which started this thread pleasewatch it again. (I'm sure youve watched it a 100 times)
This is a "screen shot" from "energy from the vacuum" floyd sweets secrets
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-t...2520floyyd.png
The rest are obvious
New Free Energy by George Mitchell - YouTube
ThaneCHeins's Channel - YouTube
ThaneCHeins's Channel - YouTube
Great thread Ashtwerth hope all is going well in other regards.
Best wishes Duncan
__________________
Whatever you can do,or dream you can,begin it.Boldness has genius,power and magic in it.Begin it now.
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 11-03-2011, 10:39 PM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Motor installed for RPM control

Here's a new video of the first motor test. The input is approximately 30 Watts and calculated kinetic energy is about 102 Watts. Not sure how much input will go up when loaded yet.

Chalkalis EM Replication First Motor Test - YouTube
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 11-03-2011, 11:25 PM
Roland Roland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by n84dafun View Post
Here's a new video of the first motor test. The input is approximately 30 Watts and calculated kinetic energy is about 102 Watts. Not sure how much input will go up when loaded yet.

Chalkalis EM Replication First Motor Test - YouTube
Good job! I look forward to seeing whats next.

I think the plywood that was mentioned before could be give you some more stability. The plywood does not have to be solid to work, you could cut out the center like a frame...
Keep up the good work.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 11-04-2011, 01:52 AM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
How do you calculate the 102 watts of kinetic energy?

Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 11-04-2011, 02:23 AM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Equation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones View Post
How do you calculate the 102 watts of kinetic energy?

Matt
I got the equation from his blog: F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER

Watts Equation: Wt(kg) * 9.8 = Newtons * Radius(m) * rpm / 9550 = KWatts

The specs on my replication:

Total Center weights 7lbs = 3.18 kg
Diameter = 30 in, Radius =15 in
Location of weights from axis = 15 in * 45% = 6.75 in = .171 m
(Center weights location are 45% of radius)

Plugging in the values:

(3.18kg) * 9.8 = 31N * (0.171m) * (180 rpm) / 9550 = 0.100 KW = 100 Watts
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #256  
Old 11-04-2011, 02:47 AM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
I ran his Math across a couple of people who are into that stuff. Its not valid, thats part of reason he catches alot of negative attention.
Basically it boils down to a really complex math problem involving angular velocity and angular momentum. You have 2 states, start up , and run.
You cannot apply the same math to run that you would under start up. He has problem with that. Once the pendulum is in motion your input is only responsible for a very small portion of the rotation.

Now I am not saying the effect isn't valid but you should do an electrical conversion.
Use a generator and an adjustable load. If you want valid numbers.

I have already experimented with the pendulum and I am sure there is something to it But his math is really wrong and very odd for the condition he is calculating.

Don't make the same mistake of making claims on his math.

Also to stop the shaking you could just get some boards on the ceiling and wedge two longer boards between the ceiling and floor. Make sure you have tension. That should help alot. If you can anyway.

Nice work
Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
Reply With Quote
  #257  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:14 AM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones View Post
...Basically it boils down to a really complex math problem involving angular velocity and angular momentum. You have 2 states, start up , and run.
You cannot apply the same math to run that you would under start up. He has problem with that. Once the pendulum is in motion your input is only responsible for a very small portion of the rotation.

Now I am not saying the effect isn't valid but you should do an electrical conversion.
Use a generator and an adjustable load. If you want valid numbers. ...
I'm not sure exactly how he came up with his equation either. If anyone can suggest a better equation to figure out the energy of a rotating mass at steady state rotation, that would be great.

I'm thinking of using the other motor used in my Lockridge motor project. Maybe use the modified motor as my drive motor and unmodified motor for the output generator.

-brian
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #258  
Old 11-07-2011, 10:22 PM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Almost there

Here's my Chalkalis EM Replication with generator on system but not attached to the shaft:

Chalkalis EM Replication with Generator - YouTube

By the way, there's a new video from Chalkalis himself: F.M.CHALKALIS DRIVING SYSTEM CHANGES 2011 - YouTube
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #259  
Old 11-08-2011, 12:06 AM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
That starting to get real neat.

Nice work bud.

Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
Reply With Quote
  #260  
Old 11-08-2011, 03:28 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier. A donation!

Hello World,
keeping my promise i am bringing you the latest news from Mr. F.M.Chalkalis blog.

"Sunday, November 6, 2011
"He who thinks freely, thinks well" a quote taken from Rigas Feraios
There were moments, while reading some articles and posts, when I felt that this world just doesn’t deserve to be given anything for free.
These were moments of great disappointment and discouragement from the behavior of some people. But still, my personal beliefs for a better future, prevailed.
And as it proves there are many more like me out there, sharing the same beliefs.
I am saluting all the purely thinking fighters for Overunity.
The ones having the power to form their own opinion about what is really happening and do not just follow the opinions and directions of some columnists or organizations that “allegedly” care for our well being.
In the following links you can find out on your own what I am talking about as well as Who are some of these gentlemen that supposedly represent the struggle for a better world.
Energiewende - Ein Brief an Greenpeace | Politaia.org
Free Energy Suppression
Just search on your own “who is behind free energy organizations”

As far it concerns these still negatively commenting, I think it is not necessary to repeat the undisputed scientific certifications about its functionality.
Unfortunately, due to lack of specialized electrical knowledge as well as lack of the necessary funds required to order the appropriate pulse generator, I have not yet been able to harvest power out of the device, which though is calculated to be more than 70% usable.

These are the latest data and development:

CHANGES IN THE DRIVING SYSTEM
The driving system is placed at 36° degrees and the first pulse is given while the second weight is located at the 1° degree. As a result, there is Smoother operation, almost silent and impressively less power consumption in the driving system.
F.M.CHALKALIS DRIVING SYSTEM CHANGES 2011 - YouTube

ONE MORE ENERGY OUTPUT POINT OF THE SYSTEM
At number 4 of the comments I wrote, I say that special attention should be given to the base and the elastics.
Later I realized that my calculations «300 RPM x 50 kg = 15000 kg / min which means 900 tons per hour » were wrong. I did not calculate that at the 300 RPM of the existing prototype, the main weight is rotating at a speed of 57,650 Km / h and the external weight is rotating (running) at a speed of 126,604 Km / h.
Therefore the pulse pressures are much higher and at 300RPM exceed the 25.000 N
Witnessing the size of that force made me realize that we can get output energy from another point of the system as well. Without changing any of the previous data.
Since then, I have conducted various experiments, trying to convert these pulse pressures to a rotary motion, but with no successful results so far. Other, larger forces, appear in the system, changing the expected behavior.
Some friends advise the use of a piezoelectric system for the collection of that power. Insisting and emphasizing, that this energy alone is enough.
Unfortunately I have no knowledge of this technology, nor access to it.

This innovation has been donated and belongs to humanity.
Hopping to the help of Every One of Us for further development.
In the past I have written about who I am and how I work. I have never asked for anything personally.
A kind request. It would be great, if anyone willing and able to help in any way to this effort, would communicate through email.

Fotios M. Chalkalis"


You can find the letter and all links on chalkalis.blogspot.com
W32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #261  
Old 11-08-2011, 03:32 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Dear n84dafun and Knovos,
I do congratulate you for your hard work as well as your enthusiasm.
Though, I have to say you are not paying much attention to the specifications.
1)I doubt that your frames will manage to hold the forces even in such smaller scale replicas
2)You have more that 20% losses because of your NON aerodynamic shapes.
3)Mr. Chalkalis uses two pulses on every rotation, which is the 085% of the perimeter
4)The elastics on the driving system have to be with air tubes, not solid, in order to be soft enough.
We must agree with Mathew Jones, because in order to calculate the actual power we must use the new laws of MechanoDynamics.
Best regard
W32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:04 PM
n84dafun n84dafun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82
Generator Test

Here's a video test of my generator. I'm going to need some pretty high gear ratios to achieve the high RPM the generator requires for significant power output. The gearing will definitely reduce the overall efficiency of the whole system.

Gererator Testing - YouTube
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 01-18-2012, 06:22 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier 2012 News

Hello World & Happy New Year!
I would like to inform you about the 2012 news on Mr. F.M.Chalkalis's Energy Multiplier. I would suggest you read the letter and then watch the video.


Friday, January 13, 2012
ETHELOTIFLIA
(Willful Blindness)
Happy New Year.
My wish for 2012 is for everyone to have good Health and that there be Peace and Love which unfortunately lessen more and more everyday in our civilization.
The congratulation messages of some people that even equate me to the great Leonardo Da Vinci give me the strength to continue my work.
I did not have the opportunity to study physics. Maybe if I had studied I would have never got involved with this matter.
For many years now, there are scientists shouting that Newton's theory is wrong.
I have also proved that in practice using my invention. Because in my opinion, in this theory the centrifugal force is misestimated and the effect (the phenomenon) of the lever disregarded, as well as Gravity.

Dear fellow humans, considering the amount of information exchange and communication available today, e.g. internet, it really makes me sad to realize that the Willful blindness of a large proportion of humanity place us in a situation, worse than it was in the Middle Ages. They are prisoners of what they have been taught being unable to think on their own.
What I do not understand and troubles me, is that great scientists got to the point of searching the God in CERN and yet they could not change fundamental errors in physics we are being taught for more than 300 years now.
Also, I do not understand the other scientists and leaders of this world, who supposedly care for alternative energy, yet all the various development programs, adopt only solar, wind, bio-fuels, etc. ignoring Gravity, the endless energy to which we owe our existence as written by great scientists such as Stephen Hawking, F.M. Kanarev and others.

These are the latest development updates:

1. Part of Dr. Kanarev 's article “ABOUT THE PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE”, dedicated to the young mechanics of the 10th All-Russian Congress. August 2011.
Link to the document on Google Docs
(You can download the document in PDF format from within google docs link by clicking Ctrl+S )

2. As you can see in the video, the driving system functions with one motor and a single flywheel. Providing the same results with a lot less consumption. It would be ideal with the appropriate tire profile.

3. In the video you will watch an experiment in which practically, without any electro motion and any need of mathematics, I believe it is being understood, even from the more skeptics, that our system has nothing in common with the ones it is being compared to. Perhaps they will even be able to snap out of their taught physics lethargy and realize the advantages of the triangular shape, the lever and the addition of external pulse motion that make our system functional.
Also It is clearly visible that:
• With the use of two toothpicks, applied at 510mm distance from the shaft, we can rotate the 50 kg pendulum.
• The spectacular amount of force cutting a 30x60mm wooden board while the second weight is still located at 32,6 degrees. The wooden board is placed at a distance of 190mm from the shaft, where we have the Maximum power. That equals to only 11% of the force, torque we had at that given moment. Now, consider the size of the force, torque on 180 degrees plus the momentum of centrifugal force on higher rpm.

4. Output energy, as I wrote before, has to be harvested from the main shaft. Starting when the second weight passes the 0 degree point and ending when the second weight again passes the 180 degrees.
In the example with the painted tube (cylinder) on the main shaft, you may see another way of how I imagine a pulse generator with the magnets build on the main shaft and passing the coils only during the falling. The size of the generator can be increased by adding more magnets in length. Every millimeter away from the diameter of the main shaft is as a loss.
5. Regarding smaller size constructions, I believe that reading the brilliant example used by Hughe at "Nexus" is the best way to make you understand why in the past I wrote that if my space allowed it, I would have used heavier weights or longer arm or even both and certainly longer lever.

All efforts are welcome in our fight but in smaller size constructions the results (the effect) will be invisible causing disappointment and misleading evidence. Please do not derogate from the specifications.
Good Luck to everyone.

Fotis Miltiadis Chalkalis
Video: http://www.youtube.com/F.M.Chalkalis 2012 Update

Best wishes to all
W32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:38 PM
Cloxxki Cloxxki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 457
(all, I also added my comments on Youtube, please help me understand or correct me if you can)

Any theoretical support or founding for your theory please?
Why would pressing down under a given angle offer a gain?
A simple rough calculation would be greatly appreciated.

I have seen your work, replications, but have no clue what your invention is about. I don't see why there would be any sort of magnification from an inpulse as your propose.

Thanks,
J
__________________
 

Last edited by Cloxxki; 01-18-2012 at 07:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 01-21-2012, 08:01 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloxxki View Post
(all, I also added my comments on Youtube, please help me understand or correct me if you can)

Any theoretical support or founding for your theory please?
Why would pressing down under a given angle offer a gain?
A simple rough calculation would be greatly appreciated.

I have seen your work, replications, but have no clue what your invention is about. I don't see why there would be any sort of magnification from an inpulse as your propose.

Thanks,
J
Hello Mr. Cloxxki, I just wanted to inform you that there is an answer from Mr Chalkalis on your youtube comment:

"Dear Sir,
Your comments lead to the assumption that you did not read or understand the description of the experiments shown in the video. The published analysis of the presenting forces in every stage of the pendulum rotation would have answered all your questions.
I am sorry you cannot understand." CHALKALIS


W32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 01-22-2012, 11:26 AM
Cloxxki Cloxxki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 457
If anyone on the forum understands this technology, and define it in a few sentences, please do for everyone's benefit!

Am I crazy to see very significant input of work through the toothpicks, and very typical leverage breaking the piece of wood?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 01-23-2012, 04:18 AM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,259
Any similarities?



Physics Of Skateboarding

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 01-23-2012, 05:13 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloxxki View Post
If anyone on the forum understands this technology, and define it in a few sentences, please do for everyone's benefit!

Am I crazy to see very significant input of work through the toothpicks, and very typical leverage breaking the piece of wood?
Mr. Cloxxki,
Since you do realize that the torque of the pendulum, rotating with such a small speed, is big enough to break the 30 x 60 mm wooden board, why can’t you realize the size of the torque on the shaft when the pendulum rotates at 160 or 300 rpm using a lot less input to maintain its speed?
Now, I don’t really think I could “define it in a few sentences” as you wish.
Maybe someone else in the forum could do that, but IMHO you should study all details on your own if you really want to understand.
About the “very typical leverage breaking the piece of wood” sounds to me like describing football as “22 men running around on a field of grass kicking a leather ball”….
Friendly Regards
W32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 01-23-2012, 06:08 PM
Cloxxki Cloxxki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by W32 View Post
Mr. Cloxxki,
Since you do realize that the torque of the pendulum, rotating with such a small speed, is big enough to break the 30 x 60 mm wooden board, why can’t you realize the size of the torque on the shaft when the pendulum rotates at 160 or 300 rpm using a lot less input to maintain its speed?
Now, I don’t really think I could “define it in a few sentences” as you wish.
Maybe someone else in the forum could do that, but IMHO you should study all details on your own if you really want to understand.
About the “very typical leverage breaking the piece of wood” sounds to me like describing football as “22 men running around on a field of grass kicking a leather ball”….
Friendly Regards
W32
Respectfully, it sounds to me like you are confusing accumulated kinentic energy through repeated pulses input with torque. There is no OU unless you offer an explanation. I strongly fear that your misunderstanding of physics has led you to claim OU from an utterly simple device with complicated instructions.

All I saw in the recent video, was an overly complicated pendulum which needed a very signifant push just to keep going. The fact that the pulses were below the breaking limit of 2 toothpicks doesn't tell us anything.
First the pendulum was lifted over top center, and then it received repeated long pushes.

A normal pendulum is expected to make multiple rotations after such a lift and subsequent pushes. If anything, the pendulum suffers from high drag. Not that drag will ever stand in the way of overunity, it should easily overcome it.

Anyone, please tell me I am mistaken when I address the issue of energy vs. torque as the inventor seems to use it as proof of OU?
I only have highschool level of physics, but a good idea is usually easily explained to me. I am not dumb. At least my mom told me I'm not :-)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 01-23-2012, 09:37 PM
W32 W32 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by aljhoa View Post
Any similarities?



Physics Of Skateboarding

Al
Mr. aljhoa, I would like to express my sincere congratulations on your Excellent reply!
Mr. Cloxxki, The aim of argument, or of discussion, is not victory, but progress.
Thank You!
W32
__________________
W32
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers