The cell phone jammer is amazing! I have got one, really does work, you know, without the annoying of calls, peace of mind. I think everyone needs one. hope can help you.

Nice question peter. There are many studies behind it and many corporate hands too, but in real sense it is really damaging to human brain. people are longer aware of this problem, every month some 3000 people get deaf due to noise pollution and unnecessary loud chat on their cell phone and it also cause them tumor too.

Hi Peter … a disturbing thread ! I thought you might be interested in Prof Konstantin Meyls views on the mobile phone as a health hazard , I am doubtful that the system politic will allow us to convert to this much healthier Tesla option that he proposes any time soon, still Konstantin considers the mobile phone system circa 0044 mins https://vimeo.com/41021469 I would be interested In what you make of his conclusions
Best wishes Duncan

Hi Peter, Duncan, Dutch and ALL

ATM, we have advised a brain tumor patient who has the tumor WHERE THE PHONE WAS, to take the following, she is doing it, will update the thread with results as they come in.

If your not already using speaker and have been using a mobile phone for a while i would consider doing a course of Tonic III, this girl knocked her brain tumor out by using it, its an amazing story

The Story of Phoebe Latham | Products | Products

Ash

Just a humble attempt to describe what I suspect is happening and a very simplified version of what Konstantin, Eric, Peter and Nicola have been trying to tell us , first in my opinion It is not only mobile phones (although of course that’s primary to this thread ) but any HF spurious emissions I would ask you to take a look at the section marked “official recommendations” at the end of this article by Rife researcher Aubrey Scoon

The End of All Disease - Can Disease Be Cured Electronically?

The observations beg the question why should a relatively low frequency High voltage transmission line also prove to be carcinogenic ?
In my very simplified view the answer is they are both basically the same system all be it on a different scale. Most people learn nothing about electricity that leaves cables and flies through the air they never go near or operate a radio transmitter and all they really know of a radio receiver is how to turn it on .
In order to try and keep it very KISS as far as the current theory goes the maths of radio transmission and reception can be considered identical and in order to draw a picture some might be familiar with, consider the case of a CB radio It had an antenna of a specific size and design just as your Television has an aerial of very precise dimensions … They are both manufactured to be sympathetic to transmission or reception of a specific frequency (or a very narrow band of frequencies) next if you recall came some coax cable usually rated at 50 ohms for a CB and 75 ohms for your television and so where would you measure this 50 or 75 ohms with your meter? the answer is of course you cant, the 50 or 75 ohms is called the characteristic impedance and its what the receiver or transmitter “sees” at that particular frequency, To put this in mechanical terms you can view it like “pass the parcel” you want all of the signal to leave the transmitter and enter the cable you want all of the signal to leave the cable and enter the antenna you want all of the signal to leave the antenna and launch itself into free space preferably going in the right direction.
Alas perfect isn’t possible, if it was every scrap of power would be leaving the transmitter. All this gets far more demanding as a physical construction at higher frequencies such as mobile phones use.
In order to set this “pass the parcel” to an optimum an Instrument called a S.W.R was issued Its job was to measure the power being reflected back and let the user adjust things a little bit.
Here's most of what I've just stumbled through explained a little better

HowStuffWorks "How does a CB radio antenna work?"
A short read of the start of this Hams forum will show you that some spurious signal will always be present

Spurious Emissions

Mobile phones now seem to be more of a fashion accessory and a toy that seems to invade public space and air waves rather than the short term emergency communication which it was originally designed for. The impedance matching and physical design of the aerial are now very much a compromise and so look what happens when you transmit into a miss – match
To use the pass the parcel analogy you thrust the parcel at the last guy and he pushes it back at you, most of the contents are scattered any where all over the floor, In practice this can be anywhere in any strength at any frequency (and yes I did say in any strength) although I could not experimentally replicate it or explain the cause, CB guys and Radio Hams call this effect “spurious emissions” and try to avoid it like the plague. I'm sure you have all experienced a taxi driver or a police transmission breaking through full strength onto a TV program or onto your telephone line even though the frequencies and even the systems are meant to be far apart.. .. you perhaps start to get the random feel of this reaction and as Konstantin points out in the last link I posted, all sorts of desperate measures are taken to try and suppress the effect..... Is it possible that our brains are susceptible to a unknown spurious signal or a cell ? In my opinion of course it is. you bet your life (and you do)
Keep In mind that there is a whole electrical and transmission system who's maths and theory have been hidden from us for years
To try and explain our present systems (Herzian) In very simple terms it seems to run rather as if you were ringing a bell, with a bell rope attached to the clapper, your hand being the transmitter the rope being the transmission line and the bell radiating sound being the aerial broadcasting.
Time the swing right get the length of the rope right with the correct amount of power most of the energy will make it to the bell and be broadcast as sound … get it a little wrong and there is spurious effects …. abstract frequencies on that bell rope of different sizes and in the case of our mobile phones its next to our brain!.

To draw a simple parallel the system Tesla devised and Konstantin and Eric are at pains to point out did not have a bell rope system it was in effect a solid bar connected to the clapper . All the power is transferred with no loss, there is no time lag as the wave travels up the rope and most importantly in this context no random spurious emissions! ( coming into our bedrooms where Its not allowed as Konstantin says )
As I'm sure most of us are aware this faster power free safe system was effectively destroyed and the transmitters in the UK and the USA dismantled and the technology buried The sad tale of E.P.D desperately trying to save one of the last of these stations is outlined here

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...%20Dollard.pdf

by the way if your lucky enough to have a few spare coins, throw it this guys way ... hes a star! who could do with a hand

what one of these spurious signals which could of course be of any frequency may react with, or if some part of us will have sympathetic impedance and resonance with is in my opinion wide open.
I do recall in the late 1960s several reports of authenticated radio traffic being picked up which had originally been transmitted from aircraft in WW2.although I cant remember where that came from so I wont dwell on it.

And so why do I draw your attention to power lines also ? Its the same system It has a transmitter … The generator It has a coax or transmission line … the grid It has an antenna your local substation … It has an SWR cept they call it power factor and reactive power
like the CB and the mobile phone when there's a miss match it must throw spurious emissions the florescent tubes are very broad band receivers in this respect but a spectrum analyser would tell a different story

Folks Worried About High Tension Power Lines (EMF-Health.com) - YouTube

Like the C.B Radio and Bell Rope examples I think these can be literally pretty much any frequency and react with any sympathetic impedance E.P.D has noted transformers with little or no load on them blowing to pieces from the centre of the core with no rhyme or reason, and I have seen much the same effect myself.
From what I have scribbled here you can see that our present power and radio systems in an ideal situation would have an S.W.R of 1:1 if we are ever allowed to use Tesla’s system again it would have an S.W.R of 1 : infinity and the antenna ? probably … a ball

Given the few clear differences I have pointed out I'm sure Tesla’s explanation of a loss free system as he points out himself here

http://www.free-energy-info.com/TeslaTrueWireless.pdf

Will Now make sense ! No loss incidentally means to me no random energy release at any frequency to play havoc with cells or anything else for that matter!
Of course I'm very far down the food chain compared to Peter and Eric and Konstantin and I know from rash and ill considered comments on other threads that there are extremely clever multi disciplined amigos on this forum still I feel with out conjecture we simply hold a status quo which isn’t good enough in the case of this bloody disease and a system which seems to promote and support it . I of course welcome your comments observations and criticisms I seem to be riding rough shod over many disciplines here and to maintain a grasp I'm very indebted to very clever people who have gone out of their way to present things In such a way that I can a least get a tentative grasp of what they see so clearly, in that regard this one does it in spades

The Spark of Life: Electricity in the Human Body: Amazon.co.uk: Frances Ashcroft: Books



Regards Duncan

In the modern times, cell phones have become an essential part of our life. You will be out of fashion if you have no cell phone. One hand, you can send massages and make phones to your friends or your colleagues with phones at any time in any places. On the other hand, we will enjoy our life with it, such as listening to music, playing games, taking photos, recording a vedio, suffering the internet, etc. But more and more people are using cell phones at the expense of public interest. They talk aloud over the cell phones, the endless ringtones sounded everywhere. How to cope with the noises of cell phones in public has drawn public attentions in many places of the world. Do we have to force ourselves to listen to the noise generated by cell phones? Of course not, Cell phone jammer is a useful tool for us to deal with the noise pollution.I have bought one for my convenient life, so if you have the same problem with me, you can come to get one. You will find the cool of it.