Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Sponsored by Teslacoin Foundation

Teslacoin Foundation

https://www.teslastarter.org


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 02-24-2010, 11:18 PM
Stealth Stealth is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Free energy

I have often wondered, but have found no explanation, to confirm the law of thermodynamics that states, ''energy can not be created or destroyed''. If in fact, energy cannot be created or destroyed, then what happens to the electricity we use in our electric machinery? Does it revert back into the environment from which it came? Then why can't we create a machine with a closed loop to keep recirculating this energy? Why would it not run uanabaded forever, except for periodical maintenance? If it is only changed from one form to another, it should be possible to continue to change this process until we no longer have need for it. Until the period in which we become so advanced as to be capable of producing all our basic needs upon request from our own thoughts. When we have access to the nature of the universe itself,and can become one with all creation. Is this our ultimate goal, to not only observe the universe, but become one with it?I have read of several people who, I think, have done just that, to a certain extent.Will there be a time when our very thoughts manifest themselves into matter? Good Luck. Stealth
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #32  
Old 02-25-2010, 01:47 AM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Answers I hope to help.

Well our current system only uses current as the strengthener to our device. More power scotty. But there are many devices on this forum that don't need the current to run or very little. Our current devices usually disapate a good portion to over come other layers of rules like resistance(heat) and friction (heat) to name a few. Most the return energy gets reused to destroy the same Dipole That Bearden talks about. It's all a shuffle game even with out current devices or methods. No energy is being consumed at all. It just gets disapated or returned to the battery or whatever source you are using and a good portion to the environment for it to be recycled by nature.
As for the Free energy you are talking about well how can it be free if we don't have to pay for it even in our current system. It isn't free, it is just there. With the right conditions it could and most likely will be used as a potential for something else. It never stays still and is in constant motion no matter if you are there or not. Free is a buzz word of this type of con. If you divert or convert it in a current device it goes thru the converter to the other things like heat and such. But if you hadn't pulled it off it's course it would have done what it always has done and continue to move and help the next thing move. It isn't Free. The problem is this free implies it has a cost somewhere and if what I have observed just because you don't pay for it there is still a cost. The cost might not be what comes out your battery but then gets shifted to maybe em radiation or anything else concidered a byproduct or a certain pollution (disorganized byproduct). Even with the methods I have descibed in this thread there sure will be a cost. But one thing I know is that cost will not take much to readjust to go back to it's natural form. With other methods the cost gets shifted. Take for instance the battery for a Bedini motor charger. the batteries go thru a fundamental change. They say they are conditioned. Well what I have seen is the material looks the same but the molocules of the plates and even the acid get smaller. Because the battery has all the energy sucked from it from between the particles that make it up. This is why the batteries on the kromrey converter had to be charged for hours or days before they would take the charge. This energy they squeezed out of it had to fill back up which is a slow process even when charged conventionally since this natural energy isn't in high amounts when using regular electricity. It could be the exact reference I put to about the capacitor or coil works the same in a battery. If you take more from one side it creates a complex field in the battery and it takes a while before it disapates and returns the battery to the normal condition.
We need to start thinking in the byproducts as a cost. Yes when left alone it will revert and disorganize into the natural form but in the mean time the cost is a poison to our environment with curent methods which can and will be a poison to us.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-25-2010, 02:19 AM
amigo's Avatar
amigo amigo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 744
Jbignes5,

no offense, but I wish you used a new-line more often. Or condense your thoughts to shorter sentences. Or both.

So far your posts are sooo long, they seem like one long uninterrupted sentence...at least for me it makes it very difficult to read or follow.
__________________
Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-25-2010, 02:36 AM
Stealth Stealth is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Free is a relative term. There is always an upfront cost involved with building a unit to convert this energy. Also there is a periodical maintenance cost, and or repair cost for parts. These things are a given. There can't be perpetual motion, as any friction and or heat reduces the efficiency to fall below what is needed to fully sustain its motion. All observable systems have a definite lifespan, from terrestrial to extaterrestrial planetary systems. Even galaxies have lifespans, although they use their power and materials to create more galaxies, so in a sense , they seem to be perpetual in that sense. When we use systems to produce energy, we are only creating a system for energy itself to propagate. We do not create elctricity, per se, but only create a conduit to channel energy through it.We have not created anything, but have only allowed energy from the environment to be captured and or manipulated. This is what Tesla did, and I hope you are able to capture and increase the energy to do your bidding. Then, it will cost you very little, if not free.Good Luck. Stealth
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-25-2010, 06:18 AM
leedskalnin leedskalnin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 26
I Agree!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth View Post
Free is a relative term. There is always an upfront cost involved with building a unit to convert this energy. Also there is a periodical maintenance cost, and or repair cost for parts. These things are a given. There can't be perpetual motion, as any friction and or heat reduces the efficiency to fall below what is needed to fully sustain its motion. All observable systems have a definite lifespan, from terrestrial to extaterrestrial planetary systems. Even galaxies have lifespans, although they use their power and materials to create more galaxies, so in a sense , they seem to be perpetual in that sense. When we use systems to produce energy, we are only creating a system for energy itself to propagate. We do not create elctricity, per se, but only create a conduit to channel energy through it.We have not created anything, but have only allowed energy from the environment to be captured and or manipulated. This is what Tesla did, and I hope you are able to capture and increase the energy to do your bidding. Then, it will cost you very little, if not free.Good Luck. Stealth
I agree with you Stealth!
The best historical evidence is this: Why J.P. Morgan destroyed the Wardenclyf Tower?!! Because he wanted to put meter on energy receivers and Tesla said that is FREE ENERGY generation!! and then he(Morgan) destroyed it! Energy can be generated freely but there is some cost for maintenance and designing the generators unit.

Thanks
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-25-2010, 07:45 AM
braden braden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 70
Electricity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth View Post
I have often wondered, but have found no explanation, to confirm the law of thermodynamics that states, ''energy can not be created or destroyed''. If in fact, energy cannot be created or destroyed, then what happens to the electricity we use in our electric machinery? Does it revert back into the environment from which it came? Then why can't we create a machine with a closed loop to keep recirculating this energy? Why would it not run uanabaded forever, except for periodical maintenance? If it is only changed from one form to another, it should be possible to continue to change this process until we no longer have need for it. Until the period in which we become so advanced as to be capable of producing all our basic needs upon request from our own thoughts. When we have access to the nature of the universe itself,and can become one with all creation. Is this our ultimate goal, to not only observe the universe, but become one with it?I have read of several people who, I think, have done just that, to a certain extent.Will there be a time when our very thoughts manifest themselves into matter? Good Luck. Stealth
Stealth, I have often thought of electricity as a form with mass, when in fact electrons have no mass(Matter is made out of waves!) and have been proved to be wave forms .This may explain wirelesss electicity which we know can be demonstrated. This whole area of extracting and making Aether work for us seems to follow a pattern of discovery. If you think of the puzzle as a jigsaw and step back and take a look at the pieces people have uncovered ,history gives us a clue in that, Resonance,high voltage , creating a stressed electrical field ( capacitors) ,spark gaps, and Magnetic quenching all seem to be the ingredients needed to make things happen.It has been documented that magnets are in fact a radiant energy sink and that the north and south poles are in fact the entry and exit points for the Aether. Tap into or harness this work horse and you tap into ZPE. I have been working on this for quite a while, using this lead in the attached doc. I have a been working on a device which combines the following works, Aspens, Cooks, and Hubbards coils incorporating magnetic quenching of a spark gap. I make no claims, but with I have witnessed some very interesting results. I am convinced that by putting all the above in a mixing pot and through trial and error ,you will stumble upon the answer. Tesla was an engineer ,who had the resources to tinker his whole life and he to stumbled on the unexplained. Think of what we have today at our finger tips( Electronics abound), and ask how come we havent already found the answer, its simply because none of us work collectively and poole our approach and thinking .Any back to that tinkering
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Aspen_June2007A_Update.pdf (44.5 KB, 67 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by braden; 02-25-2010 at 07:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-25-2010, 01:28 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
I am sorry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by amigo View Post
Jbignes5,

no offense, but I wish you used a new-line more often. Or condense your thoughts to shorter sentences. Or both.

So far your posts are sooo long, they seem like one long uninterrupted sentence...at least for me it makes it very difficult to read or follow.
I understand and you have to bear with me. It is the way I communicate. It takes some time to get the gist of my concepts. It is also my very essense that has led me to this concept.

I appologize if i run together or rehash stuff so many times. I can be obsessive about explaining everything all at once and it jumbles my ideas. I will work on condensing ideas more and refining my communications from now on.

I just think it is important to fully understand this and sometimes I go overboard.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-25-2010, 01:39 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by leedskalnin View Post
I agree with you Stealth!
The best historical evidence is this: Why J.P. Morgan destroyed the Wardenclyf Tower?!! Because he wanted to put meter on energy receivers and Tesla said that is FREE ENERGY generation!! and then he(Morgan) destroyed it! Energy can be generated freely but there is some cost for maintenance and designing the generators unit.

Thanks
As I have suggested the cost shifts to what happens when you seperate the polarities. This shifting makes weird things happen if it isn't of a higher frequency like Tesla reported in his experiments. So thats the cost I am talking about. Somethin akin to pollution but has a faster disapating or disorganizing factor. This is because it is closer to this fundamental source and has little translating or conversion to return to it's natural state.
__________________
 

Last edited by Jbignes5; 02-25-2010 at 02:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-25-2010, 06:17 PM
ewizard's Avatar
ewizard ewizard is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outside the Matrix
Posts: 1,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbignes5 View Post
I understand and you have to bear with me. It is the way I communicate. It takes some time to get the gist of my concepts. It is also my very essense that has led me to this concept.

I appologize if i run together or rehash stuff so many times. I can be obsessive about explaining everything all at once and it jumbles my ideas. I will work on condensing ideas more and refining my communications from now on.

I just think it is important to fully understand this and sometimes I go overboard.
While I got straight A's in high school and college English I tend to write like you do on forums. I personally think this type of writing indicates an intelligence where you see the connectedness of everything. It can be hard for some people to follow. I wouldn't worry much about it as sometimes getting your ideas down in written form can be sidetracked if you spend too much time concerning yourself with correct grammar and and formal writing style. I don't want to discourage you from working on your writing style though if that's important to you but just don't let it stop you from getting ideas out.
__________________
There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-25-2010, 06:46 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Thank you...

Thanks,

There is one thing I need help in and you guys are my goto men or ladies on that topic. I encourage you to help me stay focused by the ocassional pointing out of things that make it hard to understand.

I wanted to tackle a much higher order of these more then microscopic particles or conductors. Think of a volume of these particles. All in order and lined up like little magnets that float on planes that are 90 degreese from the radiative source. This volume can be expressed in a simpler way as looking thru multiple lcd screens at the same time.
They tend to link and connect in 3d version of multiple lcd's stacked from you to the source. These connectors from each lcd link to the ones behind it and when you move them in front of you it allows the connections to automatically align from the source to your eyes. Even though it allows you to see the source it only allows what you can percieve and the rest is deflected away from you just by you changing your viewing angle from the set angle of the connectors.
This radiative event is just that, 360 degrees all around the source. Since you only can percieve 2 angles with your eyes thru the network of connectors, you only see a limited amount of the energy that it is radiating. Now light has a value that takes to travel a distance because it is a wave of the source. The light has limits and not the connectors. Hence why there is a darkness around black holes. Since light is dragged into these black holes the drag must be faster then light can do to escape the attraction.
So faster then light travel is being done already in nature. That travel is the potentials moving on the network of connectors twords the black hole. The energy is still there it is just moved faster then it can to show the radiative event outwards.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 02-25-2010, 07:18 PM
Stealth Stealth is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Teslas discoveries

Tesla imagined a group of rods extending into space. He then contemplated the temperature difference of the rod ends here on earth, compared to the temperature of the ends of the ones extending into space. He knew if he could create that difference, he could exploit the energy radiating from it. He did manage to create a similar experimental condition. What he discovered was that when such a condition exists, there is a great potential for energy capture. He now only needed to redirect and change the energies signature to be compatable with his own invention,AC current. What he really discovered is, that space is one polarity, and earth is another. This is why lightning strikes the earth. Replicate this scenario and you can supply energy to all the world, just as Tesla supposed. You will need to create negative ions to cause this to happen. Good Luck. Stealth
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #42  
Old 02-25-2010, 08:33 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Now back to the particles.

......|>(+)<|......Weaker potential bond condition to the outside potentials

......<|(+)|>......Stronger potential bond or amplified by the source charge

{+}<|<|<|(-)<|(-)<|(-)<|(-)<|(++++)|>(-)|>(-)|>(-)|>(-)|>|>|>{+}.......Major amplified source charge

{}= potential of the source or Ghost charge. (-) these are attracted in the original field and are part of the balance of nature to the supplied (+) source.
Remember that the (+)|> the tip is a focal point of the charge as pure potential of the charge following the conductor. The tip makes this a natural amplifier on a one way basis with alittle backwards ability to feedback to the source. The feedback is only on real charges and not the ghost charges or potential.
This is a slice of the method these particles use to go any distance by just pure charge potential from the source. With distance adding deresolution of the charges organization thru less and less of the end potentials conduits. Like a light bulb looking like a dot farther from the source.
These particles align to the potential original charges or attain a balance. After the balancing they just stack with more uncharged connectors afterward that can carry the potential to any distance. These are the connections that I am working on to describe anything in our nature. They are unfinished but a basic guide for now to some of the basic static transfer of potentials. With a little sight related examples as proofs of this concept.

I believe the most fundament shape for this particle is a pyramid. Why? Well think about this for a bit and look the the conductor. Knowing how like charges repell why would two of them stick on the charge potential. As with the Tesla switch we know a viariable voltage like an ac signal is generated by just taking the difference of a more negative voltage. Tesla knew this parallel and series setup was just a focuser. Lets look at two real charges.. (-)<----> (-).... We can all agree they repell right? Well now we introduce our potential provider or perfect conduit over space for this charge.
(-)|>(-)
This would attract from the very nature of the particle. More area to conduct from the larger left area surface. The right charge is strongly pulled to the to the left charge because it is focused more twords the tip. Remember these particles are superconductors. For some reason they are the very substrate of what I bellieve makes up iron or ferrous materials. The natural background has a thinner grouping of these like in space. When bigger masses are formed these conductors tend to line up in a radiative way going from the center of the planet to the outer of space. Not loosing the connection but just the potential is present outside of the real (matter) charge fields. The ghost image that is distance related is only a ghost of the real matter all connected via channels or vastly dense fields of these conductors.
Everything exists on our world in shells and there is a reason for that. The singularity inside our planet is channeling the radiative material into spears all pointing out of our planets center. This material I believe was not of the same as the superconducting background. It could be said that they have an attraction to our matter. The matter reacts in different ways in having a variable amount in each different type of material or alloys of these different conductors in the superconducting materials. The variable is in the amount it contains and the size of them. This radiative event going on in our planets core pulls on the matter because of the on rush of everything radiating around it in it's charge field. Meaning a transferance of all the radiative falling into its recievers or conductors. I believe as you go closer to the core things get pulled on harder. Can anyone confirm this thru conventinal dogma? If thats a yes then we now know what causes gravity. And you can see where I am going with that can't you?

We can take this further by deducing that the sun is the opposite charge singularity then earth or any other clestial body in our solar system. This is what causes the orbit by the attraction and pulls of the rest of our solar systems charge polarity. I would also like to say that we must have the moon because it completes our balance in the whole solar system. Push one planet out of the acceptable range of orbit and blam the whole system is out of wack. It would realign naturally by itself if left alone though.
This could also be the explaination of the Ice age that happened in our history. By a 13th planet exploding, wherever it was, would throw the entire solar system off and it would need to rebalance taking a pretty long time.
__________________
 

Last edited by Jbignes5; 02-25-2010 at 09:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-25-2010, 11:00 PM
Mavrick23 Mavrick23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17
Long messages

Too often people try to condense their thoughts too much when writing messages and end up leaving questions or misunderstandings about the details. I would rather see longer messages bearing on a single topic than too short and feeling still in the dark. Granted you can go too far (Beardon's wrings drive me crazy) but I don't normally see that in the forums.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-25-2010, 11:57 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
I agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavrick23 View Post
Too often people try to condense their thoughts too much when writing messages and end up leaving questions or misunderstandings about the details. I would rather see longer messages bearing on a single topic than too short and feeling still in the dark. Granted you can go too far (Beardon's wrings drive me crazy) but I don't normally see that in the forums.

The problem that I see with my writing is that it goes this way and that. I am trying now to keep on closely related concepts so as to not make it tough to read. But I find myself drifting from unorganized to a razor sharp thought about a concept and back again.
The problem is this concept and further concepts are completely comming to me the further I try to focus on the subject. I start from the basic rules of motion and potential creation and add a rules from there to explain little parts of physics.
The concepts there is in a roughed out shape and need refinement and maybe a mathimatical ruleset designed around the original base set of rules. Much like in my onion example.

The core set run it all. With each layer adding additional branches of complexity and interaction rules. The complexity comes from clumping of the connectors into groups and size of the connectors.

Matter seems be a condensing of these particles that drag other much larger matter into clumps or groups centered around much smaller singularities like the heart of the atom. The external being the Electron sphere or shell. One potential inside and one outside with the outside being a potential ghost charge that is opposite the internals polarity. Since atoms are still relatively small the ghost charge can effect the internal singularity because it is within it's charge field. This would allow you to shift to and from the energy inside the singularity. Maybe resonance applies here?
I lost my thought. I think I'll rest for a bit.
__________________
 

Last edited by Jbignes5; 02-25-2010 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-28-2010, 01:47 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Sorry for the delay..

I am a computer technician and when I was given the chance to test Windows 7 I jumped on it. Unfortunately my rc candidate ran out and I re installed my XP x64. So that the reason for my lack of posts as of late.

Is everyone following this stuff or do we have unanswered questions? I might be able to help you out with the methods I am trying to infer here. Any method that you are having a hard time with can, in the best of my ability, will be answered.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-01-2010, 08:06 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Old picture....

Check this out and tell me what you guys think. Anything look familiar in this photo?



Zoom in the image and tell me what you think....
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-01-2010, 08:13 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbignes5 View Post
Check this out and tell me what you guys think. Anything look familiar in this photo?



Zoom in the image and tell me what you think....
Tesla building TPU ?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-01-2010, 09:11 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
This is the box.

Look at his left arm. There is the box. If you look at the device he is working on it is a board with a coil (sudo magnet) with a ceramic insert and electrode thru the ceramic. This I believe is half an emitter that was built in a modual that he could slip into position in the box. I wish I could find a better hi-rez version to zoom into but I haven't found a better source for the picture yet.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-01-2010, 09:59 PM
Slovenia Slovenia is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,668
Good Job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbignes5 View Post
Look at his left arm. There is the box. If you look at the device he is working on it is a board with a coil (sudo magnet) with a ceramic insert and electrode thru the ceramic. This I believe is half an emitter that was built in a modual that he could slip into position in the box. I wish I could find a better hi-rez version to zoom into but I haven't found a better source for the picture yet.
That is one of the clearest Tesla pictures I have seen. Most of them are not that clear and when you enlarge them just once they become illegible. Thanks for sharing the photo.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-01-2010, 10:01 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Here is another but the contrast is messed...

Better picture but not as good on the contrast.

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-02-2010, 07:39 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,461
Date of this photo would be important to find what is Tesla working on ...
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #52  
Old 03-02-2010, 09:53 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by boguslaw View Post
Date of this photo would be important to find what is Tesla working on ...
I would if I had the information. The only caption this had was that he was in his 60's. There is no real date and nothing but Tesla working in his lab. Use your own eyes. Thats what I do in cases like this. We know he is working on a module that apparently goes in the box to the lower left next to his arm. It also appears he put the module on another smaller square box to work on it. Looks like he is making connections to the coil that he uses to creat a field.
My best guess is a half magnetic quenched spark gap from the appearance of the module but I could be wrong.
Maybe someone else could help me id the photo and the items as well...?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-03-2010, 01:32 PM
jibbguy jibbguy is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 987
Don't want to be a "downer" but in the old days, instruments & instrumentation nearly always used to come in very beautiful wooden boxes exactly like that one portrayed in the pic. And often the documentation for the instrument was stored in the lid as this appears to have.

So it could be something a lowly as a resistance Decade Box Or an old wire recorder (using wire instead of tape), or an early Brush pen chart recorder. Or a high-impedance, high precision VMM.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-03-2010, 01:57 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
you are correct.

I believe the box against the wall and above everthing else is exactly what you are talking about but the box I mention is the lower box that has maybe a silk interior. This silk interior was put in a box that was meant to show off the interiors components when viewed after and experiment.
So I agree that the various boxes on the smaller end were of the very boxes you describe. The only thing I see out of place is the lower left box. Which by the way almost match to the details of the report from his nephew. I don't see the holes for the rods but it could have been before this was done seeing that he is working on the internal module at that time. But then again it could have been just a component box like described by his nephew that had the tubes and rods in it.
I think my main focus is the device he is working on. It seems to fit my descriptions perfectly of any one side of the emitter assembly.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-04-2010, 12:45 AM
amigo's Avatar
amigo amigo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 744
You guys have surely seen the coloured Tesla photos, right?

www.Magnetricity.com ...

__________________
Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-04-2010, 01:12 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Wow

Nice pictures. Heh. I don't usually like colorized photo's I tend to stay with the black and whites for accuracy. Well I looks like I was way off on the picture but it did teach me that he used modules in the boxes he created.
Better news is my neo's are on the way.. I'll throw a link to show you what they are.

cPath_1_13 | products_id_218 | 2 in OD x 1 in ID x 1/8 in Thick Rare Earth Neodymium NdFeB Ring Magnets, Grade N42 - Applied Magnets & WindMax Wind Turbines

These should allow me to pass the electrodes thru a ceramic insert. Although shielding the opposite pole might be easier with these. I'll have to see about that.
__________________
 

Last edited by Jbignes5; 03-04-2010 at 01:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-04-2010, 11:22 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,461
Then this photo is from 1920 or nearby.He started work on his black box device probably.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-05-2010, 01:59 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Well...

Quote:
Originally Posted by boguslaw View Post
Then this photo is from 1920 or nearby.He started work on his black box device probably.
Lets think about this. The car was a pierce arrow 1931 model. It was a luxury car from that day. So it probably was anywhere from 1931-1940. I will read the report from his nephew again and see if he mentions his uncles age. I remember that something was mentioned but I overlooked that.

Nope it clearly states that it was done in the summer of 1931. Tesla at the time would have been 75. And it clearly states that his nephew was 43 years younger, that would be at age 32.
Hope that helps.

Ok so on monday if everything goes well I'll have my mags to start testing the magnetic diodes. I'll start pouring over the patents again to see if the magnetic quenched sparkgap can be found again. Maybe I can find some reassurance that I am indeed on the right track from the patents.
__________________
 

Last edited by Jbignes5; 03-05-2010 at 02:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-05-2010, 02:32 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,015
Bah wont let me edit my previous post.

Here is an exceprt from the Complete patents of Nikola Tesla..

The magnetic arc gap was capable of handling the large currents required by Tesla. In achieving powerful, sudden impulses of one polarity, these were the most durable. Horn shaped electrodes were positioned with a powerful permanent magnetic field. Placed at right angles to the arc itself, the currents, which suddenly formed in this magnetic space, were accelerated along the horns until they were extinguished. Rapidly extinguished!

Arcs were thus completely extinguished within a specified time incre*ment. Tesla configured the circuit parameters so as to prevent capacitor alternations from occurring through the arc space. Each arc discharge represented a pure unidirectional impulse of very great power. No "contaminating current reversals" were possible or permissible.

Reversals ... alternations ... would ruin the "shock broadcast". The effect was never observed when alternating currents were engaged. High voltage was supplied by a large dynamo. Tesla could speed or slow this dynamo with a hand operated rheostat. Power was applied in parallel across the capacitor. The magnetic arc was linked almost directly to one side of this capacitor, a long and thick copper strap connecting the magnetic arc and the far capacitor plate.

This simple asymmetric positioning of the magnetic arc discharger to one side of the dynamo supply produced pure unidirectional electropositive or electronegative impulses as desired. Tesla designed this very simple and pow*erfully effective automatic switching system for achieving ultra-rapid impulses of a single polarity. Capacitor values, arc distances, magnetic fields and dynamo voltages were all balanced and adjusted to yield a repetitive train of ultra-short singular impulses without "fly back" effects.

The system is not really well understood by engineers, the exceptional activities of the arc plasma introducing numerous additional features to the overall system. While the effects, which Tesla claimed, can be reproduced with electron tube impulse circuitry, these produce decidedly inferior effects. The overall power of the basic arc discharge is difficult to equal. Tesla even*tually enclosed the magnetic arc, immersing the gap space in mineral oil. This blocked premature arcing, while very greatly increasing the system out*put.

Most imagine that the Tesla impulse system is merely a "very high fre*quency alternator". This is a completely erroneous notion, resulting in ef*fects, which can never equal those to which Tesla referred. The magnetic discharge device was a true stroke of genius. It rapidly extinguishes capaci*tor charge in a single disruptive blast. This rapid current rise and decline formed an impulse of extraordinary power. Tesla called this form of automatic arc switching a "disruptive discharge" circuit, distinguishing it from numerous other kinds of arc discharge systems. It is very simply a means for interrupting a high voltage direct current without allowing any backward current alternations. When these conditions are satisfied, the Tesla Effect is then observed.

The asymmetrical positioning of the capacitor and the magnetic arc determines the polarity of the impulse train. If the magnetic arc device is placed near the positive charging side, then the strap is charged negative and the resultant current discharge is decidedly negative.

Tesla approached the testing of his more powerful systems with certain fear. Each step of the testing process was necessarily a dangerous one. But he discovered that when the discharges exceeded ten thousand per second, the painful shock effect was absent.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-05-2010, 04:56 PM
Stealth Stealth is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
If you want to discover what Tesla was working with, you only have to build and see for yourself, the Tesla coil. Most of his ideas and experiments mushroomed out from his coil discoveries. This one invention sparked his study into static electricity and aether. I think they are interlinked. Find out how one works and you will ultimately find the other. Lightning is the strongest force we know of, yet we can't, as of yet use it to our benefit. We have not yet built a machine to harness this free electrical power. Maybe Tesla did. He studied the bible and discovered how the ark of the covenant built and stored power, so he used that as a blueprint for what he was searching for. Morey later discovered the same thing, but his machine was different from Tesla's, so there could be many different ways to capture this aether energy. I would say, build the Tesla coil first, as that seemed to be the start of his understanding.Good Luck. Stealth
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers