Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Sponsored by Teslacoin Foundation

Teslacoin Foundation

https://www.teslastarter.org


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #12181  
Old 05-30-2018, 02:12 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
This picture is inaccurate. Once you transmitter is broadcasting, even a nearby pipe can harvest the energy. My RX/TX slayer are wound both the same way. We need to peel the BS and rattle shaking to experimentation.

However Helical coil direction does matter when you set up your transmitter. I had two primaries, both wound with the same diameter just in different directions. No matter how I tried to get one to work, I couldn't produce the same power with the other. My L2's are wound CW, my primary worked the best CCW



the ETBC is a very flexible device ... it's not inaccurate , you just don't understand it ! it's a model not just a device , for a Tesla wireless transmitter to work in such a compacted area we need other requirement to fill ..

when i say a model it can be beyond what you see it ...it's not my fault you see it inaccurate.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #12182  
Old 05-30-2018, 03:26 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post
the ETBC is a very flexible device ... it's not inaccurate , you just don't understand it ! it's a model not just a device , for a Tesla wireless transmitter to work in such a compacted area we need other requirement to fill ..

when i say a model it can be beyond what you see it ...it's not my fault you see it inaccurate.
I may not understand it, but then again I haven't seen results that want me to understand it. I call em as I see em med, and when people see that pic, and think that's a requirement for TX/RX, and it's simply not true. So shake that rattle... If the goal is power generation, I'm not buying any sacred geometry.

You'll have guys wasting years trying to build spark gap resonant coils and winding them CW and CCW, back and forth, on and on... more years on the blasted exciter.

Please don't take it as a personal attack. I have told you before, I am willing to abandon any branch of my research when a learn that there is really nothing there. I'm a hermit crab moving to better shells. If you want to live in yours forever... more power to you. But it's my right to challenge you on experimental grounds and propose sanity checks.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12183  
Old 05-30-2018, 08:35 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
I may not understand it, but then again I haven't seen results that want me to understand it. I call em as I see em med, and when people see that pic, and think that's a requirement for TX/RX, and it's simply not true. So shake that rattle... If the goal is power generation, I'm not buying any sacred geometry.

You'll have guys wasting years trying to build spark gap resonant coils and winding them CW and CCW, back and forth, on and on... more years on the blasted exciter.

Please don't take it as a personal attack. I have told you before, I am willing to abandon any branch of my research when a learn that there is really nothing there. I'm a hermit crab moving to better shells. If you want to live in yours forever... more power to you. But it's my right to challenge you on experimental grounds and propose sanity checks.

if there's a result with it you will use it even if you don't understand it ..
when you work with an ETBC you have too many options , you can work with a Mixed ETBC, you can choose the serial ETBC, you have the dual one ( D-ETBC ) or if you are good enough you can try the T-ETBC

the beauty here even if you try a T-ETBC you have at least two configuration !! the most successful device is the S-ETBC , now i ask you did you built such device and test it ? most people built such device say it has a kind of hidden power.


i spent at least a 5 years developing the ETBC, the final model which describe it as a compacted Tesla wireless power transmitter is the key to fully understand it , i can share a photo show some test :





i was trying the possibility to use stainless steel as a core for the ETBC, heating effect was very tiny compared a normal coil ( i used Mazilli driver which put significant current inside it ..) this tell us it's not a classical electromagnetic device..

some strange test i was able to light a small incandescent light bulb without using a coil , as i said it's a very flexible device , i just opened the CD connection and put another small ETBC ( with ferrite core ) inside the big ETBC that work as a capacitor only and i can take power !

in all test there is energy consumption when a load is attached even in a capacitive induction ! this lead me to think there's another parameter should be discovered .
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot_2018-05-30_21-25-03.png (236.5 KB, 477 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12184  
Old 05-31-2018, 01:59 AM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Med do you have a video of constant output of parallel loads? Incandescent bulbs are fine, LEDs are fine => 10W.

Basically something that stays on for up to 10 hours with 8Ahr battery?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12185  
Old 05-31-2018, 02:54 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
Med do you have a video of constant output of parallel loads? Incandescent bulbs are fine, LEDs are fine => 10W.

Basically something that stays on for up to 10 hours with 8Ahr battery?

i didn't arrived to this level ! i just compare the IN versus the OUT , in HV there's always an extra power but not to the point of constructing a self sustaining device..
i use a capacitors and see the discharged power ..

from time to time i take some studies and try low voltage experiments .. since it's very safe and easy to change the configuration in the fly , this allow too many variation in a small time, in my opinion the same law will work in HV or LV because we are dealing with current and voltage they exist and no way to run away from this fact

Don Smith video always lead me to think there's more .. he say the output don't affect the input in any respect which seem to be very difficult if not possible to some of us

i was very upset in an experiment when using a capacitive induction mechanism , the input is 3W when attaching a 3W bulb the consumption increased to be 6W

i tried to benefit from Lorentz forces without success , i tried the ETBC in the most advanced config but we always learn from mistakes !
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12186  
Old 05-31-2018, 12:18 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post


Don Smith video always lead me to think there's more .. he say the output don't affect the input in any respect which seem to be very difficult if not possible to some of us

This is definitely true once you have a RX/TX capacitive coupling. Output does not effect input. Once you get your EBTC to resonate, and place another coil nearby, you'll have achieved it.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12187  
Old 06-01-2018, 02:10 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
This is definitely true once you have a RX/TX capacitive coupling. Output does not effect input. Once you get your EBTC to resonate, and place another coil nearby, you'll have achieved it.

can you explain an example about a capacitive coupling ? the question remain why we can't achieve high power ? a few watts can't do a great job !
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12188  
Old 06-01-2018, 04:15 AM
ricards ricards is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 255
Hi med,ilandtan,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitive_coupling

wikipedia does a very good explanation of it. and provides examples too.

maybe the reason why we can't have high power is because were not aiming for it..
sticking with 12 volts..
sticking with slayer exciters..
maximizing the geometry..
etc..

on don's smith table top device, the primary capacitors are 4uf and it looks like a tank circuit.. at 2KV that's about 8 joules..
If you guys have ways to eliminate the output affecting the input power.. I think you just need to cycle larger amount of energy..
If a resonant tank circuit at that rating is maintained by a source of 12v..
and the output does not affect input.. technically you should be able to make a high power devices by now.. don't you think?.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12189  
Old 06-01-2018, 05:13 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
Hi med,ilandtan,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitive_coupling

wikipedia does a very good explanation of it. and provides examples too.

maybe the reason why we can't have high power is because were not aiming for it..
sticking with 12 volts..
sticking with slayer exciters..
maximizing the geometry..
etc..

on don's smith table top device, the primary capacitors are 4uf and it looks like a tank circuit.. at 2KV that's about 8 joules..
If you guys have ways to eliminate the output affecting the input power.. I think you just need to cycle larger amount of energy..
If a resonant tank circuit at that rating is maintained by a source of 12v..
and the output does not affect input.. technically you should be able to make a high power devices by now.. don't you think?.

Hello ricards,


low voltage is very safe to work with since i don't have a clear method how to replicate Don Smith effect ( not the device ..)
about the output don't affect the input i think yes there some sort of methods but it's not easy to do !
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12190  
Old 06-01-2018, 12:07 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post

can you explain an example about a capacitive coupling ? the question remain why we can't achieve high power ? a few watts can't do a great job !
Gentlemen, Tesla was doing this at high power, over great distances. So we know that capacitive coupling at higher power is possible.

The transmission is only a secondary effect.

If output does not affect input, doesn't it sound logical that you can create an independent circuit that contributes to the input power?

Ric... the reasons for Slayer Exciters are because they are cheap, turnkey resonant systems. They're power can be ADDITIVE.

For Example: Slayer primary L1TX consumes 6W, L3 of RX produces 3W. I should be able to create the drive for another whole Slayer, or why not just drive a second primary?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12191  
Old 06-01-2018, 12:26 PM
ricards ricards is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
Gentlemen, Tesla was doing this at high power, over great distances. So we know that capacitive coupling at higher power is possible.

The transmission is only a secondary effect.

If output does not affect input, doesn't it sound logical that you can create an independent circuit that contributes to the input power?

Ric... the reasons for Slayer Exciters are because they are cheap, turnkey resonant systems. They're power can be ADDITIVE.

For Example: Slayer primary L1TX consumes 6W, L3 of RX produces 3W. I should be able to create the drive for another whole Slayer, or why not just drive a second primary?
well that is quite interesting.. I've tried the Idea wired and capacitive coupled to capacitors not really like TX/RX..
have you tested if multiple receivers is possible without affecting input? or without diminishing output from other RX?..

edit.
oh and what is the efficiency of your RX?..
__________________
 

Last edited by ricards; 06-01-2018 at 12:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12192  
Old 06-01-2018, 02:32 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
well that is quite interesting.. I've tried the Idea wired and capacitive coupled to capacitors not really like TX/RX..
have you tested if multiple receivers is possible without affecting input? or without diminishing output from other RX?..

edit.
oh and what is the efficiency of your RX?..
My input uses 12.6VDC@470ma and my RX output I measured 297VDC(open across a bridge rectifier)@115ma(when shorted across bridge rectifier).

I'm not claiming I get 34W of power, because I can't light a 30 watt incandescent.

But I have 15W LED that I can barley get glowing if I harvest the slayer L2 coil, but I can make it probably 70-80% bright on my RX, and that is a 100W equivalent so it throws off a good clip of light. Not bad for 6W of input.

I know I can run multiple RX, but soon as I start grounding them together it affects the output of my first RX. The best way is to ground them is to different sides of the battery terminals, so one RX will ground to the Neg, one RX will ground to the positive. If you ground to the battery you eliminate the capacitive effects of nearby objects and increase efficiency. That is the only way you can place an un-grounded metal plate between the two and still transmit the energy.

There is a science to all of this and DS knew it. Let me give you and example, I was using 20 inch jumpers, and decided it was too messy but when I moved to 16 inch jumpers, there was a reduction in output. Much of it has to do with the power of your Slayer Exciter, and that is all about tuning.

With my 12V Slayer, I can pull about 1.3cm of an arc.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12193  
Old 06-02-2018, 01:45 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
Gentlemen, Tesla was doing this at high power, over great distances. So we know that capacitive coupling at higher power is possible.

The transmission is only a secondary effect.

If output does not affect input, doesn't it sound logical that you can create an independent circuit that contributes to the input power?

Ric... the reasons for Slayer Exciters are because they are cheap, turnkey resonant systems. They're power can be ADDITIVE.

For Example: Slayer primary L1TX consumes 6W, L3 of RX produces 3W. I should be able to create the drive for another whole Slayer, or why not just drive a second primary?


there's no problem with high power or great distance if we could compact the same mechanism.. ( we don't need high power and we don't need great distance if we could change that system to work locally )
the transmission is a secondary effect but in the ETBC system the two work together , this mean we have a kind of energy balance

i think we are using a totally different system this is why we can't understand each other properly.. anyway i just give an opinion to something that may change our view to the electrical laws according Tesla ..


regards

__________________
 

Last edited by med.3012; 06-02-2018 at 01:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12194  
Old 06-02-2018, 03:17 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post
there's no problem with high power or great distance if we could compact the same mechanism.. ( we don't need high power and we don't need great distance if we could change that system to work locally )
the transmission is a secondary effect but in the ETBC system the two work together , this mean we have a kind of energy balance

i think we are using a totally different system this is why we can't understand each other properly.. anyway i just give an opinion to something that may change our view to the electrical laws according Tesla ..


regards

Yep, I agree. I fail to understand what you are trying to accomplish with the EBTC.

When you get a self running device. Please message me directly.

Thanks!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12195  
Old 06-02-2018, 06:09 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
What I am trying to do is what DS said would be possible:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Smith to NuEnergy Yahoo group
The 02 Device in the 1600ís Chair has three separate coils tuned to the same frequency as the Tesla Coil from the center. A limitless number of separate coils, each duplicate the energy present in the Tesla Coil. This does not draw down or limit in any way the original energy source, however it duplicates fully the source. Magnetic Waves which spin the remote electrons duplicates the original energy source without reducing in any way the source. ( Physics as prescribed by the establishment is 100% wrong ) Feedback from the remote Coils supplies excess energy, some of which can make the Device self sustaining. The 03-2 Device uses the same system for feedback. See upper left end of Device for the dual Coils on a ceramic rod center mount
If it's what I'm thinking you should be able to use capacitive coupling to separate input and output, thereby using the output to drive the input harder or maybe even be self sustaining.
__________________
 

Last edited by ilandtan; 06-02-2018 at 06:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12196  
Old 06-03-2018, 01:37 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
Yep, I agree. I fail to understand what you are trying to accomplish with the EBTC.

When you get a self running device. Please message me directly.

Thanks!





no sign of success until now ... very long road , but experiments is our last chance in this field .. !

welcome
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12197  
Old 06-14-2018, 12:07 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Hi Med,

The reason I don't understand what you are doing is that you keep trying to build a device that is "balanced" and compacted in the same device.

Where did you contrive those requirements?

I don't see the big picture goals, because if you take a device, that's passive, and that doesn't generate more energy nor feed back energy, holistically you will be clamped to the physical laws of inductance, reluctance, Ohm's law, Lenz's law.

The proximity of the parts will make it respond as a transformer, and inductance will be the strongest component... which as you know output will effect input. There more you pull, the more the device will draw.

I perceive that the ultimate outcome of the EBTC.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12198  
Old 06-15-2018, 08:38 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
hi ilandtan,


we are celebrating the holiday of Ramadan

the ETBC is just a coil, with more freedom degrees .. it's just a theory ))
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12199  
Old 06-28-2018, 01:21 AM
ricards ricards is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 255
Resonance

Has anyone really tried to make any don smith device in a resonant fashion?..

Like calculating inductance and capacitance..
matching the tank circuits resonant frequency..

or any of the sort..

and not really take the Output power forcefully, like directly through a load.
but like a split where some of the output is used to maintain the source oscillation for it to grow bigger and more powerful.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12200  
Old 07-06-2018, 12:29 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Thumbs up



@ ilandtan

hello !


it maybe interesting to you and other researcher in this field to share the following drawing which prove the ultimate relation between Don Smith and the ETBC !

to the right my model the T-ETBC , to the left an image token from Don 1996 presentation :




don smith system appear to be a 4 layer ETBC, this mean two layers form the primary but another set form the secondary which can be a perfect arrangement to cancel lenz's law ( maybe to extreme level ..)

the conducting foil appear clearly ! i watched that video several times but never noticed this until recently !!!! ( maybe the reason is the length of that video which exceed two hours ... )

regards



edit : the exact time can be seeing here : https://youtu.be/Cr07kI7HhzU?t=4497
Attached Images
File Type: jpg both.jpg (131.8 KB, 402 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by med.3012; 07-06-2018 at 12:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12201  
Old 07-29-2018, 05:50 AM
Dwane Dwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post


@ ilandtan

hello !


it maybe interesting to you and other researcher in this field to share the following drawing which prove the ultimate relation between Don Smith and the ETBC !

to the right my model the T-ETBC , to the left an image token from Don 1996 presentation :




don smith system appear to be a 4 layer ETBC, this mean two layers form the primary but another set form the secondary which can be a perfect arrangement to cancel lenz's law ( maybe to extreme level ..)

the conducting foil appear clearly ! i watched that video several times but never noticed this until recently !!!! ( maybe the reason is the length of that video which exceed two hours ... )

regards



edit : the exact time can be seeing here : https://youtu.be/Cr07kI7HhzU?t=4497
Hello med 3012,
working with Very High Voltages has many obstacles associated with it. None the least of which is knowing the working voltage at its peak! Looking at Don's diagram, the termination points from the output would indicate to a storage device or invertor circuit of some form.

It also looks like the ETBC, you discovered, does not need that much energy to produce larger outputs. Is it that the ETBC is driven purely by voltage and develops the current from the fluxing of the ETBC? Giving the ETBC a uild up of current and High voltage? Which is then transformer into more appropriate usable energy?

Lots of questions!. Final one! Don suggests a 10kv NST with a 30khz frequency. Therefore, to maximise the ETBC, frequency matching the NST to the ETBC will give an unparalled high output?

Thanks for the sharing

Regards

Dwane
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12202  
Old 08-03-2018, 12:04 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwane View Post
Hello med 3012,
working with Very High Voltages has many obstacles associated with it. None the least of which is knowing the working voltage at its peak! Looking at Don's diagram, the termination points from the output would indicate to a storage device or invertor circuit of some form.

It also looks like the ETBC, you discovered, does not need that much energy to produce larger outputs. Is it that the ETBC is driven purely by voltage and develops the current from the fluxing of the ETBC? Giving the ETBC a uild up of current and High voltage? Which is then transformer into more appropriate usable energy?

Lots of questions!. Final one! Don suggests a 10kv NST with a 30khz frequency. Therefore, to maximise the ETBC, frequency matching the NST to the ETBC will give an unparalled high output?

Thanks for the sharing

Regards

Dwane

Hello Dwane !

in my opinion there's two link can help in solving your questions already published !


https://energyevo.com/2015/01/18/upd...y-yahoo-group/


https://energyevo.com/2016/08/05/nue...missing-posts/


as you know Don has several devices derived from his unique discovery.. the 4 layer system appear to be very easy to replicate and can give immediately huge output ( so it's very dangerous be careful .. ) after that he use some sort of storage
and finally an inverter .

about the final question please don't worry about the output frequency of NST ! the most important is how much you pulse your primary according to your design there's a threshold where you start to see a respond from your primary coil , find this threshold and pulse your coil as much as possible according the output level you need .

the threshold i am talking about is the minimal HV electric current that give a respond ..


regards
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12203  
Old 08-13-2018, 10:33 PM
Utopia Now's Avatar
Utopia Now Utopia Now is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 89
4 layer system, threshold ?

Hallo Med.3012

What 4 layer system from Don do you refer to , what 4 layers ?

And what do you mean by threshold ... what response should I expect ... is that a special effect in L2 ?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Don Tesla Center Tap.jpg (62.3 KB, 35 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12204  
Old 08-31-2018, 03:01 AM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
How to make Don Smith Devices Work

Let me remind everyone of Don Smith's key quotes. That his devices used magnetic resonance, and if you are working on electrical you are chasing the wrong rabbit.

If you are trying to build a resonant system, what are you expecting? That electrical resonance circuits hit some sort of ambient energy that exists and you can somehow harvest that energy? (Place buzzer sound here)

You can see from all the over 400 pages of forum the wishing that there was some mystical energy yet to discover, many of them devoted to resonant Zilano circuits produced what? A below unity light bulb? Chasing electrical resonant system without magnetic domain (Place buzzer sound here) Chasing Sacred geometries in electrical circuits may improve yield but alone...(Place buzzer sound here) (Place buzzer sound here)
I want you to imagine the DS 2KV circuit on that plywood board, the one with the movable center.
Now I want you to visualize his magnet generator the one with two magnets with coils around them, and being separated by a record with powdered Nd.
What do both devices have in common? The Kunel patent. Don Smith even specifically says one of his devices uses the same mechanism. Remember which one? The only device demonstrated working the suitcase device.

What is the mechanism? Pushing water up a hill and harvesting the return. "disturbing the ambient"

What is the ambient energy? Well what is a magnet at rest? It is ambient. The flux lines don't move so thus induces no current. So you add a mover to the magnet or the harvesting coil... you have a generator/alternator.

But do you need a mover? How bout just magnetic disruption? Disruption which alters the flux flow, again there is movement of flux, and induces current in a coil.

Important engineering flaw A DC pulse through a coil from a capacitor produces an instantaneous magnetic pulse in opposite polarities strongest at the center of the coil. It is not a uniform magnetic pulse through internal structure of a solenoid. If you don't believe me do some tests, then ask yourself why engineering models only describe static DC responses not pulses.

Furthering that fact, take your Kapanadze coil, it has a ferrite core? Nope, at least not fully It doesn't make sense that you could produce energy that way, how about putting some magnets inside a Kapanadze coil with an air gap. A resonant coil pulsed, disrupts the field between the magnets, the stator coil harvests the flux.

Simple and stupid all at the same time. What is a Faraday Homopolar generator, two magnets having the flux disrupted by the motion of a brass disrupter
Quote:
Originally Posted by My mantra from Adam Trombly
All we have to do: Is in a resonant domain, introduce an heterodyning wave or standing wave, properly and it increases the effective field density in a given electromagnet circuit. It increases the density of that field by orders of magnitude.
We should be all doing face plants right now. Now do you understand what magnetic resonance is? Hint: Its not NMR

If you take these ideas forward through Don Smith devices, it explains how ALL his devices could work. The piezoelectric element devices in the center of a PVC tubing, or his magnetostrictive devices (LOL what good is a material that shrinks or expands with electrical pulses?) Nothing ... unless it's disrupting magnetic flux between fixed magnets... hence being called magnetostrictive.

You're Welcome
__________________
 

Last edited by ilandtan; 08-31-2018 at 02:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12205  
Old 09-05-2018, 03:34 AM
thaelin thaelin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 80
Watching Don speak and how he describes what he does, there is no NMR to be seen here. Start speaking magnetic fields and that seems to be the answer to how he does it. One signal riding on top of the other. That relates to many other schemes as well.

This is simply how I see this and nothing more. If you disaggree then so be it. It's only a personal view anyhow. But the best thing, I intend to use this idea to further the trek. That path is my choice.

thay
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12206  
Old 09-06-2018, 08:54 AM
ricards ricards is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilandtan View Post
Let me remind everyone of Don Smith's key quotes. That his devices used magnetic resonance, and if you are working on electrical you are chasing the wrong rabbit.

If you are trying to build a resonant system, what are you expecting? That electrical resonance circuits hit some sort of ambient energy that exists and you can somehow harvest that energy? (Place buzzer sound here)

You can see from all the over 400 pages of forum the wishing that there was some mystical energy yet to discover, many of them devoted to resonant Zilano circuits produced what? A below unity light bulb? Chasing electrical resonant system without magnetic domain (Place buzzer sound here) Chasing Sacred geometries in electrical circuits may improve yield but alone...(Place buzzer sound here) (Place buzzer sound here)
I want you to imagine the DS 2KV circuit on that plywood board, the one with the movable center.
Now I want you to visualize his magnet generator the one with two magnets with coils around them, and being separated by a record with powdered Nd.
What do both devices have in common? The Kunel patent. Don Smith even specifically says one of his devices uses the same mechanism. Remember which one? The only device demonstrated working the suitcase device.

What is the mechanism? Pushing water up a hill and harvesting the return. "disturbing the ambient"

What is the ambient energy? Well what is a magnet at rest? It is ambient. The flux lines don't move so thus induces no current. So you add a mover to the magnet or the harvesting coil... you have a generator/alternator.

But do you need a mover? How bout just magnetic disruption? Disruption which alters the flux flow, again there is movement of flux, and induces current in a coil.

Important engineering flaw A DC pulse through a coil from a capacitor produces an instantaneous magnetic pulse in opposite polarities strongest at the center of the coil. It is not a uniform magnetic pulse through internal structure of a solenoid. If you don't believe me do some tests, then ask yourself why engineering models only describe static DC responses not pulses.

Furthering that fact, take your Kapanadze coil, it has a ferrite core? Nope, at least not fully It doesn't make sense that you could produce energy that way, how about putting some magnets inside a Kapanadze coil with an air gap. A resonant coil pulsed, disrupts the field between the magnets, the stator coil harvests the flux.

Simple and stupid all at the same time. What is a Faraday Homopolar generator, two magnets having the flux disrupted by the motion of a brass disrupter

We should be all doing face plants right now. Now do you understand what magnetic resonance is? Hint: Its not NMR

If you take these ideas forward through Don Smith devices, it explains how ALL his devices could work. The piezoelectric element devices in the center of a PVC tubing, or his magnetostrictive devices (LOL what good is a material that shrinks or expands with electrical pulses?) Nothing ... unless it's disrupting magnetic flux between fixed magnets... hence being called magnetostrictive.

You're Welcome
One device that I first heard was the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator by Tom Bearden, in one of don's video, he talked about it.. it's operation is something like you describe.

MEG theory of operation is plausible but something hard to replicate, primarily because of the recommended core to use..
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12207  
Old 09-07-2018, 02:13 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 168
Simple but not a trivial task

I'm not saying this is a trivial task, anybody can put magnets in a resonant circuit and get nothing more, because there are two obstacles that need to be surmounted.

#1 Timing
If you have taken any closed circuit driving a lamp where a coil is within the circuit, if you put a strong magnet and try to sweep it across the coil, it has no effect on the brightness. Why
  1. You know you can induce current in a coil by passing magnetic flux. This is how a generator works
  2. If the magnetic kick isn't in phase, it can't augment the output power, so it must be timing
  3. Maybe the point is to harvest the collapsing magnetic field only when the coil isn't energized

#2 Lenz's Law
If you created a way to disrupt the magnetic field effectively or made any type of generator, you know that once you place a load in the circuit, you have to push harder. It is conservation of energy. It's nature's governor, so we don't get "free" runaway energy. It keeps the universe from going up like a flashbulb. I have investigated three examples of systems that I believe are credible.
  • Adam Trombly and his co rotating closed path homopolar motor. He notes as load was increased the motor would accelerate.
  • Paul Babcock and his motor that turns off the coil before Lenz effect can push back. If you find this guy's video on the topic, it is priceless because it explains his approach to overcome these laws. And his epiphany when he understood that "the power you expend to create a magnetic field has nothing to do with the strength of the magnetic field you create."
  • Nicola Tesla and his power transmission. It is not the feat of transferring power wirelessly, a transformer is doing that by magnetic induction. It was doing it through the magneto-dielectric coupling over great distances, and storing the power in the resonance of the Earth.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12208  
Old 09-17-2018, 03:38 AM
luc2010 luc2010 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 55
Hello,

I have two questions? Please

1) I need Don L Smith book?

2)
how to determine the capacitor size???

lets
assume we need 10kw
50 hz
480 v
C= ?

guys you are awesome!!

Thanks and Regards
luc2010
__________________
 

Last edited by luc2010; 09-17-2018 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12209  
Old 09-17-2018, 07:10 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,455
Its never 50hz i think its rather hf. Try to recompute based on energy per second then per impulse for the resonant frequency then compute back the energy and current per impule and the amount of charge per second.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12210  
Old 09-17-2018, 08:36 PM
luc2010 luc2010 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by boguslaw View Post
Its never 50hz i think its rather hf. Try to recompute based on energy per second then per impulse for the resonant frequency then compute back the energy and current per impule and the amount of charge per second.
Hi Boguslaw

Nice To Hear From You!!

i think i make a mistake
it should be like
c*f = 0.043* 0.002= 860 micro farad aprox

now lets try to recompute like you recomand based on that

energy = 0.5 * c* v*v
E= 0.5* 860* 480*480
E= 99.072 joules
but the power p = e/ t or p=e*f
p= 99.072/ 0.01
p= 9907.2 w
p=9.9 kw

like you can see just some ordinary math!

btw
you dont have don smith book pdf? an answer to americas energy deficit?

guys? please
whats you think?

thanks
luc2010
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers