Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Sponsored by Teslacoin Foundation

Teslacoin Foundation

http://tesla-coin.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11971  
Old 11-05-2017, 12:11 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwane View Post
Increase matter, then we increase energy!

Dwane



understanding permanent magnet is The key to Don Smith device, we can't increase matter through proper earth grounding which is important also , take this simple drawing about how permanent magnet work, similar idea of John bedini .



in order to receive aether energy you need to send energy to it ! between the two phase send/receive you have a useful power , earthing in Tesla wireless system was very important because he used the earth as a capacitive ball, in other words his system resonate the whole globe , he put the power in place A and the earth give the same power ( maybe more ) to place B, this is why he was able to send any amount of power to any distance,

Don System is a bit different and more advanced , instead of sending wireless power why not duplicate it locally ? Tesla wireless system is very effective with no loss , your situation is correct when we deal with atomic power :



the above equation is achieved if we could divide the atom for example ( the case of atomic bomb ), Don solution is quiet simple and safe , why no to divide the electrons pair based on spin the same as permanent magnet, we need to send energy in order to receive it , so we could store radiant energy , the device have to have the ability to polarize the environment, another vital requirement is one zone interaction ( Bloch wall for example )

when these requirement is achieved earthing will be an enhancement to the system , moderate earth ground can be part of strong Over energy device .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Untcnnitled.jpg (24.9 KB, 152 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by med.3012; 11-05-2017 at 12:16 AM.
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #11972  
Old 11-05-2017, 02:53 AM
Solarlab Solarlab is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 62
F.Y.I.

Here's an older video that directly relates to "E = mc^2."
You might find it interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA

An accompanying post from April 2016 that outlines, to some extent,
a very preliminary postulation that is still under study; and consideration.
Development is progressing, all be it quite slowly and it has changed to
some extent over time.

Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Several other posts, over a period of time, on this thread provide a
bit more background.

Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

FIN
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11973  
Old 11-05-2017, 04:47 AM
tswift tswift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 323
Some people's idea of fun on a Saturday night: dinner and a movie.

My idea of fun on a Saturday night: hand-soldering an SSTC driver prototype board.



That's about as simple as a true SSTC can get, almost as simple as a slayer exciter. It's a half-bridge of two IRF540 MOSFET's driven by a TI UCC37325 chip. Feedback is by current transformer, which connects to the terminal block so you can easily swap the polarity if it's wrong. Testing coming soon....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1755_small.JPG (181.7 KB, 2 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11974  
Old 11-05-2017, 05:25 AM
Solarlab Solarlab is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 62
tswift

Few are blessed with the "Curse of the Ever Curious!"
The world is lucky that guys like you exist... they won't say thanks...
but we will ***** #great work

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11975  
Old 11-05-2017, 06:24 AM
Dwane Dwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post
understanding permanent magnet is The key to Don Smith device, we can't increase matter through proper earth grounding which is important also , take this simple drawing about how permanent magnet work, similar idea of John bedini .



in order to receive aether energy you need to send energy to it ! between the two phase send/receive you have a useful power , earthing in Tesla wireless system was very important because he used the earth as a capacitive ball, in other words his system resonate the whole globe , he put the power in place A and the earth give the same power ( maybe more ) to place B, this is why he was able to send any amount of power to any distance,

Don System is a bit different and more advanced , instead of sending wireless power why not duplicate it locally ? Tesla wireless system is very effective with no loss , your situation is correct when we deal with atomic power :



the above equation is achieved if we could divide the atom for example ( the case of atomic bomb ), Don solution is quiet simple and safe , why no to divide the electrons pair based on spin the same as permanent magnet, we need to send energy in order to receive it , so we could store radiant energy , the device have to have the ability to polarize the environment, another vital requirement is one zone interaction ( Bloch wall for example )

when these requirement is achieved earthing will be an enhancement to the system , moderate earth ground can be part of strong Over energy device .
Hi Med.3102,

Thanks for the reply and advice. I think I did not express myself properly with the increase of energy statement. What I intended to say was that if Tesla's aether theory is correct, it predicts an increase in energy with the increase of matter, therefore energy is not fixed, and as such should allow energy to be fluid in the environment. Thus, therefore, energy is not subject to the notion of mutability through destruction or creation. I could be wrong with that analysis. However, given the nature of the universe it is highly likely that the original premise held by current Physics is wrong. Also, Tesla's Aether Pump is worth considering in this regard.

Yes i agree about the Bedini concept. I too have been trying to trationalise the output from my don classic setup. I am not seeing the Bedini effect. This tells me that something is wrong. Maybe when I get the Resonance fixed I might see different output.

The NAR NMR is another interesting phenomena I read on another website run by RomeroUK. My subsequent research indicates that the NAR suggested has a few issues with it that requires some very detailed analysis at a very professional level. And, might emit, radiation. Too much for me at the present time.

regards

Dwane
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11976  
Old 11-05-2017, 06:28 AM
Dwane Dwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by tswift View Post
Some people's idea of fun on a Saturday night: dinner and a movie.

....
Maybe BM and BC, Before Marriage and Before Children for some of us!

As usual, your work show a certain clarity!

Regards

Dwane
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11977  
Old 11-05-2017, 02:50 PM
Rakarskiy Rakarskiy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 54
Donald does not hide that he got acquainted with N. Tesla's works "official-use-only". Magnetic field is a delusion. And a lot is calculated for any simulator. Sincerely.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11978  
Old 11-05-2017, 02:59 PM
tswift tswift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwane View Post
I am not seeing the Bedini effect. This tells me that something is wrong.
I find that nothing is as powerful for settling debates as experimental proof. For those who have not seen the radiant effect manifest personally, the following experimental setup will do it. It's what I used the first time it happened to me. If you run this for a little while to get some radiant energy into the battery, then you can hook the battery up and use it to run something with a transformer (such as a 12V inverter) and you will briefly see the overunity gain manifest. It doesn't last long, perhaps a minute. Obviously the longer you charge the battery the better results you're likely to get, but it isn't practical to charge even a small battery very much this way because of the miniscule charging current. For the battery I used a small 12V gel-cell, perhaps 5 AH.



For more control, use a variac before the HV transformer and turn it up just until the spark gap starts arcing, and then back it off very slightly to achieve stable firing at 120 Hz (or 100 Hz for our overseas friends). If this gets your gap too hot, just use one lead from the transformer and you will have 50/60 Hz sparks. I used a 10 KV oil-burner ignition transformer rated 240 VA, any 60 Hz neon sign transformer with a reasonable wattage rating will do. You could use an HVHF power supply like a flyback to charge a small HV cap (which then discharges through the gap with every firing) to achieve similar results if you have those parts on hand instead.

The real question, the one I pondered over since I first saw this work a year and a half ago, is WHY DOES THIS WORK? It's so stunningly simple, kind of like most of Don's devices. At the time I was using a normal house wiring ground, you've heard me say previously that with enough voltage even this works, but you're likely to get better results with an improved ground.

The answer is that this radiant energy, the stuff that works the magic, is provably just a different form of the stuff we call electricity. Like Don said, it can be stored in capacitors and batteries. To produce it doesn't require any complicated arrangements of coils, resonance, magnets, or indeed anything but an HV dipole! For those familiar with Bedini's devices, the idea of charging a battery using a large positive spike should sound very familiar. Bedini used the flyback pulse from a sizeable inductor to achieve the same result, but it isn't the coil that works the magic, it's the voltage of the dipole itself and it doesn't matter how you produce it.
Attached Images
File Type: png simple radiant.png (4.2 KB, 6 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11979  
Old 11-05-2017, 03:45 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakarskiy View Post
Donald does not hide that he got acquainted with N. Tesla's works "official-use-only". Magnetic field is a delusion. And a lot is calculated for any simulator. Sincerely.



Hello,


can you provide more details please ?



regards
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11980  
Old 11-05-2017, 09:01 PM
Elcheapo Elcheapo is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 115
method change

Hi all,

Glad to see so many persistent experimenters!
Too bad for the little success.

Maybe it's time to move over to the mhz range and
try something different.
I'm of the conviction that the higher the frequency
and voltage used, then the higher is system efficiency.

Remember that hv in a coil is directly related to no.of turns.
And yes wire length has to be either 1/4 or 1/2 Wave length.

I wound a 1/4wl coil on 1 inch pvc form. With just a 2-turn loop
of #14 at the base of the coil and driving it at 10 watts with the
old ham rig, voltage at the top end of the coil was 6 or 7 kv.
I'm sure that a smaller diameter coil would give even higher emf.

I was using 3.4 mhz for testing and didn't want to qrm my ham friends.
So I'll be building a small 10 watt unit at 3mhz to do further testing and
do away with the bulky ham rig.
3mhz is 100 times faster than an nst. If it's too high than ultra-fast
rectifiers might be needed.
You get maximum voltage from the top end of a 1/4 wl coil and max.
voltage from the center of a 1/2 wl coil.I've already tried it by holding
a Fl. bulb along the side of the coil.

I believe that it's the high sharp pulse from the bemf that brings
in some of that ambient energy. So we need a spark-gap to get those pulses.
The higher the voltage, the greater the attraction to ambient.

My spark-gap will be feeding the top end of a 1/2 wl coil, back down to
earth ground. Output coil will be placed at the center of 1/2wl coil.
Because of so many turns in the 1/2wl, output coil would only need a dozen or so turns to get 115 volts.
This would be a large step-down. And as we all know,the more stepping
down in a xformer the more current the secondary gets!
This way, It just takes a small amount of ambient to create a much greater amperage in the secondary.

Just my take on this thing. I might be all wrong.

Elcheapo
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11981  
Old 11-06-2017, 12:12 AM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031


@Elcheapo


Hello,

thank you, High voltage is good because we minimize the loss when we use tiny electric current but using higher frequency impose another difficulty especially when combined with large turn number ..

there's some key point still not discussed in this thread , i don't know why ?
for example energy balance as described by Don Smith, this is not a floating name given for decoration it's a real phenomena that can't be found in scientific literature , another key is electron spin separation mechanism.. Don said about this without physical explanation but he said the electrons met in one point and then separated again, doing the same thing forever, between the two phase you have useful power, this also explain energy balance because voltage will equal to current .

IMO we don't need a very high voltage since we are able to make an exact magnetic copy from another electric value, Don system don't care about the initial current you give to the system because he work using electron spin mechanism ! you give an initial voltage and the electrons attract the same magnetic value for free .

the phenomena can be easily seen if Metglass are available everywhere but this is not the case .., another easy option is to use ferritic stainless steel ( tiny layer tube ) as a core.

regards

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11982  
Old 11-06-2017, 03:07 AM
Elcheapo Elcheapo is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post


@Elcheapo


Hello,

thank you, High voltage is good because we minimize the loss when we use tiny electric current but using higher frequency impose another difficulty especially when combined with large turn number ..

there's some key point still not discussed in this thread , i don't know why ?
for example energy balance as described by Don Smith, this is not a floating name given for decoration it's a real phenomena that can't be found in scientific literature , another key is electron spin separation mechanism.. Don said about this without physical explanation but he said the electrons met in one point and then separated again, doing the same thing forever, between the two phase you have useful power, this also explain energy balance because voltage will equal to current .

IMO we don't need a very high voltage since we are able to make an exact magnetic copy from another electric value, Don system don't care about the initial current you give to the system because he work using electron spin mechanism ! you give an initial voltage and the electrons attract the same magnetic value for free .

the phenomena can be easily seen if Metglass are available everywhere but this is not the case .., another easy option is to use ferritic stainless steel ( tiny layer tube ) as a core.

regards

Great if you can implement it into your system,otherwise it's all just more theory.
Don contradicts himself at times. One time he says to use mhz and another
time he says, just use 30khz.
He also says, to protect investors interest, NOT everything is told.
The Kapanadze system has much in common where he says "resonance"
is the key.
We just need to try different ways until we get it right.

Regards
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11983  
Old 11-06-2017, 05:18 AM
Dwane Dwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post
Hello,


can you provide more details please ?



regards
Hi Med.3012.
Without trying to appear to be knowledgeable, what I think is being proposed is current the inductance and capacitance have to be brought into synchronisation, or perhaps with a very small leading voltage in the coil. I think the easiest way forward is to adjust the current flow by setting the value of the capacitor to allow the current to slow down and discharge through the coil in synchronous with the voltage. This will enable good LC Resonance to peak, and thus, give us the Power wave in first diagram. Correct me if I am wrong. Result efficient output.

Have ordered a Metglass core with bobbins. The supplier has threatened me with making sure I get it before Christmas! Whoopee!!

Regards

Dwane
__________________
 

Last edited by Dwane; 11-06-2017 at 05:49 AM. Reason: inconsequential information
Reply With Quote
  #11984  
Old 11-06-2017, 10:53 AM
Rakarskiy Rakarskiy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post
Hello,
can you provide more details please ?
regards
We must begin by understanding the essence of the magnetic flux itself-the dipole device. The dipole is a self-sufficient unit of energy. It consists of an equal in strength, but differs in the sign of power monopoles. The mathematical result is always ZERO -1 + 1 = 0 (Maxwell's equation, true for mathematics). But the power of magnetic rays is always there. Magnetic rays coming out of one monopole and entering another neither when not intersect, but can be focused.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11985  
Old 11-06-2017, 12:30 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elcheapo View Post
Great if you can implement it into your system,otherwise it's all just more theory.
Don contradicts himself at times. One time he says to use mhz and another
time he says, just use 30khz.
He also says, to protect investors interest, NOT everything is told.
The Kapanadze system has much in common where he says "resonance"
is the key.
We just need to try different ways until we get it right.

Regards

this is not only a theory but a practical device need more consideration, the main idea is to intercept the magnetic field using conducting foil the same as Don Smith plasma globe system :



the results is another electric component aid the magnetic field create it ! the following PDF explain how this device work in two completely different way:

www.free-energy-info.com/Mohamed.pdf

part 2 explain why the ETBC is a compacted Tesla wireless transmitter, it also give a better sight about Tesla bifilar coil, when you add another dimension to it you just make another new device i call it the extended Tesla bifilar coil ( in short the ETBC ) , this device show a double frequency behavior compared normal LC circuit , this mean the waves travel faster than speed of light , Don smith refer to this as a magnetic resonance which travel faster than light, my advice to friends here is to look for a faster waves as pro Meyl demonstrated with his experimental kits an electric scalar waves with 1.6 more speed than light ! if we use the same calculation by diving the frequencies, the ETBC show even more speed which is double speed of light !

until now the most successful device is the S-ETBC, the following video show it working, input 3W charging 100UF TO 300V in about 3 second and discharging this to 40W/220V light bulb :

https://youtu.be/lo0dRiKWUOc

the description of serial ETBC can be found here : https://youtu.be/a0FNZZywgng, keep in mind no earthing is used, no tuning , and a small ferrite core ( low magnetic permeability ) , only 4 ETBC was used, in practice you can add the desired number of ETBC you want which lead to even more power , if combined with earthing plus tuning and a better core OVER ENERGY is a normal results of open resonating magnetic system.


regards
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11986  
Old 11-06-2017, 03:05 PM
Elcheapo Elcheapo is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by med.3012 View Post
this is not only a theory but a practical device need more consideration, the main idea is to intercept the magnetic field using conducting foil the same as Don Smith plasma globe system :



the results is another electric component aid the magnetic field create it ! the following PDF explain how this device work in two completely different way:

www.free-energy-info.com/Mohamed.pdf

part 2 explain why the ETBC is a compacted Tesla wireless transmitter, it also give a better sight about Tesla bifilar coil, when you add another dimension to it you just make another new device i call it the extended Tesla bifilar coil ( in short the ETBC ) , this device show a double frequency behavior compared normal LC circuit , this mean the waves travel faster than speed of light , Don smith refer to this as a magnetic resonance which travel faster than light, my advice to friends here is to look for a faster waves as pro Meyl demonstrated with his experimental kits an electric scalar waves with 1.6 more speed than light ! if we use the same calculation by diving the frequencies, the ETBC show even more speed which is double speed of light !

until now the most successful device is the S-ETBC, the following video show it working, input 3W charging 100UF TO 300V in about 3 second and discharging this to 40W/220V light bulb :

https://youtu.be/lo0dRiKWUOc

the description of serial ETBC can be found here : https://youtu.be/a0FNZZywgng, keep in mind no earthing is used, no tuning , and a small ferrite core ( low magnetic permeability ) , only 4 ETBC was used, in practice you can add the desired number of ETBC you want which lead to even more power , if combined with earthing plus tuning and a better core OVER ENERGY is a normal results of open resonating magnetic system.


regards
Ya, that's just one of the many devices that Don built.
But I had thought this thread was about experimenting with the nst driving a tesla coil.
Sorry. Guess I'm on the wrong thread. Bye Bye
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11987  
Old 11-06-2017, 03:12 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
@Elcheapo


we only need a one device ! Bye and good luck .
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11988  
Old 11-06-2017, 04:01 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwane View Post
Hi Med.3012.
Without trying to appear to be knowledgeable, what I think is being proposed is current the inductance and capacitance have to be brought into synchronisation, or perhaps with a very small leading voltage in the coil. I think the easiest way forward is to adjust the current flow by setting the value of the capacitor to allow the current to slow down and discharge through the coil in synchronous with the voltage. This will enable good LC Resonance to peak, and thus, give us the Power wave in first diagram. Correct me if I am wrong. Result efficient output.

Have ordered a Metglass core with bobbins. The supplier has threatened me with making sure I get it before Christmas! Whoopee!!

Regards

Dwane

thank you for your explanation , there's no limit to how ambient energy can be harvested, recently with a help of friend we did a simple experiment analyzing electric current in a parallel LC circuit , starting from simulation software like Multisim there's a huge current circulate between L AND C at the same time the electric current from the source remain very low , see this :





in practice it's not the case due to resistance presence .. (wires for example) , we get 1A from the source but 3A between L AND C , this lead me to think about the necessity of gas discharge tube in Don system as a source of negative resistance to bypass the actual positive resistance which present all the time,




from some literature i found the best way to create such negative resistance is using square waves rather than sin waves, the good news is the ability of ETBC to create such negative resistance also because it oscillate internally which allow ambient power to enter to the system ,



source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_resistance
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capvvture.JPG (78.0 KB, 424 views)
File Type: jpg Untitl000ed.jpg (81.6 KB, 109 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by med.3012; 11-06-2017 at 04:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11989  
Old 11-06-2017, 06:00 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 785
With the talk about coils, bloch wall, I thought I'd drop this in - posted by John Bedini 3 years ago:
https://www.energeticforum.com/renew...tml#post266282
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Bedini View Post
...At a different point in time I will discuss what the coil is and how quantum mechanics plays an important part in all of this and how you get the extra energy out of the system. I did write a paper for University of Edinburgh along with Dave Clemons that explained the way the coil works in the system as an energy pump and how the SSG in attraction mode works. This is why I said, the Back EMF is always lower than the battery voltage. If you look at the coil in space it can be viewed with vectors all pointing in but not coupled to form energy. As the coil is pulsed compression and decompression takes place these vectors get sucked in through the Bloch Wall while it is in compression mode forming magnetic poles, North and South. This was never released to the public as it would drive everybody nuts. The Engineers at the school answered me with; we never looked at it this way. But the analyses were correct and explained why some machines work better in different areas of this God forsaken planet. Yes Gravity plays an important part in all of this. It’s only a matter of time when you will tap that Gravity wave for energy as that is where my experiments have led me in my work. I know you will read this many times to understand what I have just said and you all know the meaning of this if you do it. If we take this further you now have discovered the answer to the TPU. Some say that the Shaman resonance is responsible for this but the energy is driven by gravity that permeates everything throughout space it’s just a matter how it’s taped for energy. Solid state devices detect this wave if arranged correctly and then the TPU becomes not complicated anymore with windings and high frequency’s oscillators that is what powered Tesla’s car, the box with many vacuum tubes, so again the term Free Energy is wrong as you must put some form of energy in to start the process of conversion and hope you get more out.
Just remember that the energy cannot be destroyed it can only be converted into another form, for example the last version of the SSG...
John Bedini
__________________
 

Last edited by Bob Smith; 11-06-2017 at 06:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11990  
Old 11-06-2017, 08:07 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
With the talk about coils, bloch wall, I thought I'd drop this in - posted by John Bedini 3 years ago:
https://www.energeticforum.com/renew...tml#post266282

Yes i agree with John inspiration, my respect to this great man.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11991  
Old 11-06-2017, 09:33 PM
Dwane Dwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by tswift View Post
I find that nothing is as powerful for settling debates as experimental proof. For those who have not seen the radiant effect manifest personally, the following experimental setup will do it. It's what I used the first time it happened to me. If you run this for a little while to get some radiant energy into the battery, then you can hook the battery up and use it to run something with a transformer (such as a 12V inverter) and you will briefly see the overunity gain manifest. It doesn't last long, perhaps a minute. Obviously the longer you charge the battery the better results you're likely to get, but it isn't practical to charge even a small battery very much this way because of the miniscule charging current. For the battery I used a small 12V gel-cell, perhaps 5 AH.



For more control, use a variac before the HV transformer and turn it up just until the spark gap starts arcing, and then back it off very slightly to achieve stable firing at 120 Hz (or 100 Hz for our overseas friends). If this gets your gap too hot, just use one lead from the transformer and you will have 50/60 Hz sparks. I used a 10 KV oil-burner ignition transformer rated 240 VA, any 60 Hz neon sign transformer with a reasonable wattage rating will do. You could use an HVHF power supply like a flyback to charge a small HV cap (which then discharges through the gap with every firing) to achieve similar results if you have those parts on hand instead.

The real question, the one I pondered over since I first saw this work a year and a half ago, is WHY DOES THIS WORK? It's so stunningly simple, kind of like most of Don's devices. At the time I was using a normal house wiring ground, you've heard me say previously that with enough voltage even this works, but you're likely to get better results with an improved ground.

The answer is that this radiant energy, the stuff that works the magic, is provably just a different form of the stuff we call electricity. Like Don said, it can be stored in capacitors and batteries. To produce it doesn't require any complicated arrangements of coils, resonance, magnets, or indeed anything but an HV dipole! For those familiar with Bedini's devices, the idea of charging a battery using a large positive spike should sound very familiar. Bedini used the flyback pulse from a sizeable inductor to achieve the same result, but it isn't the coil that works the magic, it's the voltage of the dipole itself and it doesn't matter how you produce it.
Hi there Tswift,

I have been running this test circuit for about 30 hours now. Perhaps it is my small NST, 10kv 30ma, that is not sufficient. Whilst running it is more likely to run my battery down. Is it possible this battery is sulphated? Needs conditioning? However, I replaced the battery with a cap and charging was 1.1 volt per second. The output voltage from the nst, via the variac was around 2kv.So some juice is coming from the circuit. What I did notice on the scope was that I was getting a lot of positive going voltage activity. Very much like extra fine voltage strikes. Changing the HVHF diodes did not eliminate this. Not a clean output.

As you say, very much a Bedini type response, different scenario.

regards

Dwane
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11992  
Old 11-06-2017, 10:42 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,441
Do you know maybe why Tesla started with spark gap, then moved to quenched spark gap , then to rotary breakers and ended up with klystron vacuum tube switch ? If you know- you will understand why it is so hard to get extra energy using spark gap
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11993  
Old 11-06-2017, 11:42 PM
Gedfire's Avatar
Gedfire Gedfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 472
Wheel work of Nature

Dear fellow researchers.


I found something lastnight .You see, I was rereading Don's Last Words.

Then I looked up single wire transmission etc.Then the article mentioned tesla.
So I read Tesla's lecture seen here.

"Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency"



FASCINATING.I have seen something like this before and actually made something, but it only lights a very small bulb.It can't power my 400w drill.
What if I scaled up?

You know use 200v at 500hz? Does any know how to use a PWM to drive an IGBT or Transistor?

Does it reflect Don's Last Words?
Attached Images
File Type: gif tesla017.gif (8.5 KB, 428 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by Gedfire; 11-06-2017 at 11:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11994  
Old 11-07-2017, 04:07 AM
mikrovolt mikrovolt is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 782
Bob Smith,
There was a mathematics physicist named David Clements of Oxford University
visited John Bedini after coming to a conclusion there was a "negative" energy
of old that had vanished from equations. In reply John went into theory on
how this missing energy is triggered. ref:John Bedini - Inside Radiant Energy - Disc 6

The interview David Clements asked John Bedini "what was radiant energy ?"
Atlas Tesla's Radiant Energy
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11995  
Old 11-07-2017, 11:08 AM
Rakarskiy Rakarskiy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 54
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_energy

In the resonant circuit, in the coil, under the phase shift of the current and voltage, there is a position when on the graph, Current and Voltage, have opposite signs. At this point, the coil is the source, and generates energy.

The problem is the overclocking of the resonant circuit and the removal of energy, so that the resonant circuit has no feedback. Most likely, it was D. Smith who decided when he got acquainted with the closed materials of N. Tesla.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11996  
Old 11-07-2017, 01:34 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakarskiy View Post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiant_energy

In the resonant circuit, in the coil, under the phase shift of the current and voltage, there is a position when on the graph, Current and Voltage, have opposite signs. At this point, the coil is the source, and generates energy.

The problem is the overclocking of the resonant circuit and the removal of energy, so that the resonant circuit has no feedback. Most likely, it was D. Smith who decided when he got acquainted with the closed materials of N. Tesla.

Hello,


according Don Smith normal measurement equipment can't detect radiant energy effectively, in other hand we can solve the problem if we use the correct capacitor/coils combination, Don stated something like that in his Yahoo group participation again i will give the link :


https://energyevo.com/2015/01/18/upd...y-yahoo-group/


https://energyevo.com/2016/08/05/nue...missing-posts/



it's clear he used a capacitive coupling rather than inductive coupling, the technique i suggest use this kind of coupling, we are able to go further when using the concept S-ETBC because each ETBC blind the next ETBC allowing only the magnetic flux to pass, this boost the voltage in L2 coil for quick capacitor charging.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11997  
Old 11-07-2017, 04:03 PM
tswift tswift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwane View Post
I have been running this test circuit for about 30 hours now. Perhaps it is my small NST, 10kv 30ma, that is not sufficient. Whilst running it is more likely to run my battery down. Is it possible this battery is sulphated? Needs conditioning? However, I replaced the battery with a cap and charging was 1.1 volt per second. The output voltage from the nst, via the variac was around 2kv.So some juice is coming from the circuit. What I did notice on the scope was that I was getting a lot of positive going voltage activity. Very much like extra fine voltage strikes. Changing the HVHF diodes did not eliminate this. Not a clean output.

As you say, very much a Bedini type response, different scenario.
Aha! I finally got someone to try it! It's not that I don't appreciate all the people chiming in with different theories, but what turns a theory into accepted fact is EXPERIMENTAL PROOF. I've read all, or at least most, of those other theories and sources before and they were often confusing, or contradictory, or unclear, and generally there's no easy way of translating the theory to, "OK, now how do I use this to build a working device?"

On the contrary, what I'm showing is easily testable, demonstrable, and repeatable. You don't need any coils at all, or magnets, or tuning and resonance, to demonstrate the effect. Some more details: when I did this it was with a battery that was more or less completely discharged (perhaps 10V) and very weak from lots of deep cycling and hard abuse in experiments. I used a weak battery on purpose so that the tiny charging current would be evident, and it would be immediately clear in a self-looped configuration if it was running up or down. And indeed this is what I did next with the battery after zapping it for a few minutes, I used to power my PVM12 HVHF supply (which it only just barely would) in a looped configuration like Don's self-charging battery where the battery is connected with Avramenko diodes to ground.



When I turned on the PVM12, the voltage plunged to something like 7V (barely enough to keep it operating) but then within a few seconds, ZOOM! It shot up to more than the voltage where I started it and kept climbing for about a minute, until the effect dissipated and it went back to normal behavior and ran down again.

Remember that the actual power gain ONLY MANIFESTS IN A TRANSFORMER OR MOTOR. You won't see it unless you run the right kind of load with the battery. The battery still won't look very charged because it isn't. This test is just to demonstrate the nature of radiant energy and how it really is just electricity, only a different kind of electricity. It still travels through wires and can be carried on electrons or ions. It's almost like the normal, familiar electricity we know and love has a multiple personality disorder. Under just the right conditions, it can be coaxed to show its other side. But then you can store it in that condition, and I really can't figure out why that would be the case but it seems to be. I still have a lot more questions than answers but I'm trying to share what I have learned so far.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11998  
Old 11-07-2017, 09:45 PM
med.3012's Avatar
med.3012 med.3012 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Algeria
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by tswift View Post
I've read all, or at least most, of those other theories and sources before and they were often confusing, or contradictory, or unclear, and generally there's no easy way of translating the theory to, "OK, now how do I use this to build a working device?"
....
I still have a lot more questions than answers but I'm trying to share what I have learned so far.


Hello

i think most participants here want to share knowledge, where how and when we have successfully achieve our goal isn't important , it happen soon when we feel we are brother in humanity on this earth, we still have free access to more valuable resources on this earth , water , air , etc ...
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11999  
Old 11-08-2017, 01:54 AM
Dwane Dwane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by tswift View Post
Aha! I finally got someone to try it! It's not that I don't appreciate all the people chiming in with different theories, but what turns a theory into accepted fact is EXPERIMENTAL PROOF. I've read all, or at least most, of those other theories and sources before and they were often confusing, or contradictory, or unclear, and generally there's no easy way of translating the theory to, "OK, now how do I use this to build a working device?"

On the contrary, what I'm showing is easily testable, demonstrable, and repeatable. You don't need any coils at all, or magnets, or tuning and resonance, to demonstrate the effect. Some more details: when I did this it was with a battery that was more or less completely discharged (perhaps 10V) and very weak from lots of deep cycling and hard abuse in experiments. I used a weak battery on purpose so that the tiny charging current would be evident, and it would be immediately clear in a self-looped configuration if it was running up or down. And indeed this is what I did next with the battery after zapping it for a few minutes, I used to power my PVM12 HVHF supply (which it only just barely would) in a looped configuration like Don's self-charging battery where the battery is connected with Avramenko diodes to ground.



When I turned on the PVM12, the voltage plunged to something like 7V (barely enough to keep it operating) but then within a few seconds, ZOOM! It shot up to more than the voltage where I started it and kept climbing for about a minute, until the effect dissipated and it went back to normal behavior and ran down again.

Remember that the actual power gain ONLY MANIFESTS IN A TRANSFORMER OR MOTOR. You won't see it unless you run the right kind of load with the battery. The battery still won't look very charged because it isn't. This test is just to demonstrate the nature of radiant energy and how it really is just electricity, only a different kind of electricity. It still travels through wires and can be carried on electrons or ions. It's almost like the normal, familiar electricity we know and love has a multiple personality disorder. Under just the right conditions, it can be coaxed to show its other side. But then you can store it in that condition, and I really can't figure out why that would be the case but it seems to be. I still have a lot more questions than answers but I'm trying to share what I have learned so far.
Hi Tswift,
I get the message that the input is critical to this test? I like to think I live in a modern country, but, that does not mean I can always get want I want that others in their countries are able to get. This time, it is the 12v HVHF power supply. Previous was the Metglass transformer core. My nst is 220-240 vac. Not going to cut it. I see the PVM12 listed at US$ 99.95, then plus freight, for me with the FX rate, about AU$ 170+. Plus waiting time! Pity, this test might have gone somewhere. At 30 watts, the PVM12 would be a lot better than my cheap nst. Perhaps I should look at making something?

Incidentally, I review all the tests or projects I see discussed, and try to make an informed decision as to practicality of build, based upon components I have, or difficulty is getting components, time and whether the circuit/ test is within my game plan. Too much?

Regards

Dwane
__________________
 

Last edited by Dwane; 11-08-2017 at 02:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12000  
Old 11-08-2017, 03:17 AM
tswift tswift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwane View Post
I get the message that the input is critical to this test? I like to think I live in a modern country, but, that does not mean I can always get want I want that others in their countries are able to get. This time, it is the 12v HVHF power supply. Previous was the Metglass transformer core. My nst is 220-240 vac. Not going to cut it. I see the PVM12 listed at US$ 99.95, then plus freight, for me with the FX rate, about AU$ 170+. Plus waiting time! Pity, this test might have gone somewhere. At 30 watts, the PVM12 would be a lot better than my cheap nst. Perhaps I should look at making something?
The NST output voltage is all that matters for the battery-zapping experiment, it doesn't matter what your grid power specs are. You also don't have to use a PVM12, I have one on hand and it's been pretty robust and very useful for experiments. The point is that it has a transformer and it's an inverter (not for 12V to 120V 60Hz, but for HVHF) so if you feed it radiant energy then it will operate over unity. But for testing you could use a normal cheap 12V to 120V 60Hz inverter (or 220/240V 50Hz for our overseas colleagues), which is something probably all of us experimenters probably have laying around. All you have to do is power the inverter using the battery you have just zapped with the first circuit, and you should note that the inverter can deliver much more power than normal without increased input current draw. If all of a sudden you can get a kilowatt from a small gel-cell then you know something unusual must be happening. Based on what I experienced with the PVM12, you will see a short period of a few seconds to perhaps a minute of enhanced output with less current draw, then it will progressively go back to normal behavior. Remember that this is an open-loop configuration, not even attempting to run it closed loop. If this is successful then it essentially proves and demonstrates that the overunity effect (A) exists and works as advertised and (B) is due to the altered nature of the charge stored in the battery when it's charged in the right way.

My experiment with the PVM12 configuration was an attempt to keep charging the battery while under load using the capacitive coupling from the HV output. It wasn't successful at first. It was only after I zapped the battery from the 60 Hz NST that it ran up instead of down while looped, but still only briefly. Based on what I know now, if I tried this test again I would use a much smaller plate on the HV output wire of the PVM12. This would cause less loading on the PVM12 and much larger voltage swing than the big plate I was using at the time (probably close to 1 square foot). Under the right conditions it's possible that this could work and run the PVM12 continuously self-looped, because the battery is getting charged with radiant energy from the earth charging by induction, but I haven't done this successfully yet.

It was this test, where I clearly and unmistakably saw the overunity gain manifest in a normal off-the-shelf transformer, that proves a number of different points. Mostly that the transformer design and materials aren't what makes the difference, you will never achieve the results you're looking for just by tinkering with this. What works the magic is the energy itself, and when it's present any normal ordinary transformer will then run OU because of the Lenz's law cancellation (motors too, for the same reason). You're already zapping a battery, just try powering some different things with the battery and check the results and see for yourself. Do you note any differences? Does it make any difference how long you zap it for? Does it make any difference how long it sits after zapping it before using it? Try starting your car with it. If you can start your car from a small gel-cell then you have to suspect something unusual is going on....
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers