Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #9451  
Old 06-02-2013, 06:58 PM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Dear Mr Clean.

Following my insight upon Don Smith's device, I'm so curious that Farmhand could develop
Quote:
-THE TRICK IS NOT IN THE SPARK GAPS !
According to what I've understood about what Kelly wrote, the gap seems having one first virtue: letting the HV tranformer finding its self-resonance frequency without being constrained by the excitatory input.
I would add this second one: being the source of ether-compression waves creation, which is mandatory for radiant energy capture. I see a great analogy there with the E.V. Gray cell.
And Utkin gives a third one in his paper about TESLA's secrets: gathering excess energy provoked by charge pumping in the HV transformer (probably at the secondary here).

The term scalar is ambiguous, because it only indicates a mathematical field of a non-vector quantity. I've just only starting the readings of E. Dollard and I feel of course great consistency with that I deduced from other readings, in line with Faraday, Thompson, Schrödinger and in some extent Feynman (as the guy who understood, gave some clues, but has been cautious to never deny his position of official guru) which are my main inspirations.

Therefore, there are 2 kinds of scalar waves that may appear with electric circuits. The first one, consists of an electric potential wave as Maxwell theory allows to predict. The second one is an ether-compression wave that corresponds to variation of the local permittivity.

Indeed, it appears that the more charges accumulate locally and the greater is the permittivity, which is in other terms the electric capacitance of the ether (in F/m). Take a toroid of 1 meter perimeter of void and it yields 8.85e-12 F as a capacitance to gather space charges due to polarization.

At low frequency, the permittivity is a constant, as usually considered. Paul Stowe established that above the UV frequency, the permittivity does vary: this is the border between the classical wave theory and the quantum theory. It corresponds to the compressibility limit of ether and it produces effects that have never been officially studied in mainstream physics but in Tesla systems.

When permittivity varies, does the speed of light also varies and the MC2 rest energy too. Therefore material systems tend to move toward the point of lesser rest energy, thus explaining gravity. Scalar waves as ether compression waves are thus also gravitation waves.

This also brings up some explanations to the Biefeld-Brown effects because an asymmetrical capacitor does create a permittivity gradient which turns into Newtonian acceleration.

When you understand well my theoretical explanations, you have lot of insights to transform space polarization energy into actual charges and currents within your circuit. There comes lot of ways to provoke ether compression, photons and electron-positron pairs creation so to gather them into the circuit for actual usability as material electricity. TESLA-DON SMITH is a way, but variants are mostly possible (Kacher coils, Romanov, Kapanadze, etc.). You may also find other techniques with the E.V Gray motor and the Hans Coler device. I forget certainly many others.

Capturing free energy is not a rare phenomenon, it just requires to go in the HV, HF domains where ether may know compression. This is exactly like passing above the sound barrier. I'm not alas enough skilled in experimenting but I hope these explanations may help trigger on new successes.

Cheers.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #9452  
Old 06-03-2013, 08:35 AM
African African is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.clean View Post
hehe distracted? i need to be doing multiple projects at once, so when my attention nods off, i can go to the next and stay interested, otherwise i'd never finish a single thing

but by ferrite rods maybe the LMD analog? those rods are .5" dia 3" long, from Digikey i believe, comes in a huge box of like 100
coils were wound end to end, 30 gauge mag wire, then measured to find lowest inductance, and removed turns to the rest to make them all 2.133mH and all same direction (the coils will find their own polarities in the process)

As for the Smith build, in case of plain ole good info..

-copper tubing for primary (but it was an old coil, used it cause its dia and turns worked out, but was CCW) shouldve been same direction as secondaries (to my knowledge)

-B&W coil cut in half (didnt have the 4turn/inch so bought the 6 turn/inch)
better inductance anyway

-avoid large capacitances, as Don used, based on projects Nemesis, and Zeus popular Tesla coils a huge amount of info was documented and referenced to Colorado Springs notes as guidance, along with conventional transmission line theory being possible. the intention was to construct ~the Magnifier~ but not to follow anyone elses notions on wireless power or vindication of Tesla even...
....it was for unravelling the operation of the Magnifier, and MAX terminal output
PERIOD
..."when larger primary inductances are used, more tolerable caps can be used at smaller capacitance, and massive secondary inductances can be brought into play..."

i weighed the coils to get an idea of needed primary tubing, then compared the lengths, actually wasnt far off from 1/4, but as discovered from the above, systems can be far out of balance and still work if compensated with small enough capacitance
--and that the spark rate is a small fraction of the tuned frequency (not in most people's ability, unless rotary gap) so im just saying go as small L1 capacitance as you can without having to modify your coil too much

-dont buy huge output storage caps like Don did, yes they fill right up but just tuning caps where needed and maybe diodes just before load, to act as kind of a resonance barrier in a way, or your tuning will tend to change with different loads. you generally dont want anything robbing power, and untill the big output caps fill up, a load cant be placed onto them ive found.

gotta run, hope that helps
Hi Mr Clean.

Thanks for sharing this

I see that there is a bit of a spark gap topic I have found some useful information about spark gaps on these sites, I hope it would be helpful.

Multi-Spark Gap Experiments

Electrical Discharges

Best To all
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9453  
Old 06-03-2013, 12:43 PM
clarence's Avatar
clarence clarence is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by African View Post
Hi Mr Clean.

Thanks for sharing this

I see that there is a bit of a spark gap topic I have found some useful information about spark gaps on these sites, I hope it would be helpful.

Multi-Spark Gap Experiments

Electrical Discharges

Best To all

Hello African,

Clarence ,

thanks for that info you posted, I definitely saved those items! and my personal search (me) immediately virtualized one of DON,s photos from some ones past posting ( I believe it was listed as photo C34 ) which showed TWO GDT spark GAPS attached to his demo device terminal strip for that device!!! I wish I could remember that posting so I could re-save that photo back to my pc!

All of this was interesting since the GAP experiment showed that the two combo spark gaps VS the single or three gap config. gave the way higher COP value!!!! (gigantic higher).


thanks again, mike, onward!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9454  
Old 06-03-2013, 01:30 PM
mr.clean's Avatar
mr.clean mr.clean is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: calgary ab. canada
Posts: 851
TMT tuning vid

hi all quick update on the Magnifying Transmitter

TMT: Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (Pat #1,119,732) - YouTube
__________________
In the beginner's mind, there are many possibilities.
In the expert's mind there are few.
-Shunryu Suzuki
Reply With Quote
  #9455  
Old 06-03-2013, 05:54 PM
mr.clean's Avatar
mr.clean mr.clean is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: calgary ab. canada
Posts: 851
Quote:
Originally Posted by African View Post
Hi Mr Clean.

Thanks for sharing this

I see that there is a bit of a spark gap topic I have found some useful information about spark gaps on these sites, I hope it would be helpful.

Multi-Spark Gap Experiments

Electrical Discharges

Best To all
hi buddy, yes ive seen this document, and it looks really good,

but im curious, wouldn't Intalek be pumped to hook up multi-kilo watt lights to really show the output?

I do think spark gaps are important, and I do hope this is true
thanks
__________________
In the beginner's mind, there are many possibilities.
In the expert's mind there are few.
-Shunryu Suzuki
Reply With Quote
  #9456  
Old 06-04-2013, 03:14 PM
Gedfire's Avatar
Gedfire Gedfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 472
Pulsed DC to AC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gedfire View Post
Hello Peculian,
Thank for your endorsements, useful insights and encouragement.

To answer the question as to a AC output on L2 when the initial current on L1 is Pulsed DC here goes my very Layman ...
(1.) Patents: Flyback Design.
(2.) Naudin’s Solid State Generator: Notice he uses pulsed DC in and uses diodes to rectify the output from coil 2. 2SGen, an amazing tiny Solid State Generator by JL Naudin
(3.) Magnacoster Device: Lots of diodes at the output despite pulsed DC in.
(4.) PJK Chapter 11 page 115 May edition.
(5.) LaserSaber’s Joule Ringer and other Joule Ringers that have secondaries.

You are all welcome to debunk, clarify or add to what was said.This is my understanding at this time and I am willing to learn from others .

Best regards
Ged
Hi All,

Just remembered one of the circumstantial if not direct evidence of pulsed DC to AC by Don Smith himself.

The Intermediate Device with the adjustable L1 illustrates this beautifully.

Pulsed DC to L1 and fullwave rectification (of AC current)at L2.Yes, as you know, diodes on both ends of the coil and the centre tap. Good stuff!

Ged
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9457  
Old 06-04-2013, 03:30 PM
Gedfire's Avatar
Gedfire Gedfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 472
Spark Gap Power

Quote:
Originally Posted by clarence View Post
Hello Deggers,

@Gedfire,

OOOPPS!- forgot to say that true to DON'S style he did not show the spark gap (GDT) in the center terminal connection inside the toroid.

@ALL - cheers

cheers, mike onward!
Hi,

Loved the discussion re: SparkGaps in the subsequent posts.

However my main question may have been unanswered perhaps because of how I stated it.

I am curious as to the use of the SparkGap in this device.In this case does the Spark Gap also act as a voltage limiter?

To answer this I went back to Don Videos,

In the 1996 Conference and the Interview Video where he tells how to build a device, he does imply another use of sparkgaps as voltage limiters.

I am theorising that Xrays are one of the components in SG discharges that does stimlulate electron flow in metal.Maybe that was why Tesla had an Xray tube stimulating a shiny insulated metal in his aerial device.In fact I plan to try just that many month from now.(Yes,I will observe the precautions).

At Xray frequencies I can imagine the excess power gained compared to Radio Frequencies.

Regards,
Ged
__________________
 

Last edited by Gedfire; 06-04-2013 at 03:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9458  
Old 06-04-2013, 04:49 PM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Not only XRays, but all frequencies above the UV are eligibles, the higher frequency, the higher energy.
Placing the gap nearby the secondary coil may reinforce capture and increase the efficiency. Don may have found this point experimentally by practicing. Nevertheless, all these clues seem confirming the theoretical insight about photons creation triggered on by an abrupt dU/dt.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9459  
Old 06-04-2013, 05:08 PM
Gedfire's Avatar
Gedfire Gedfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 472
Spark Gap Power 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
Not only XRays, but all frequencies above the UV are eligibles, the higher frequency, the higher energy.
Placing the gap nearby the secondary coil may reinforce capture and increase the efficiency. Don may have found this point experimentally by practicing. Nevertheless, all these clues seem confirming the theoretical insight about photons creation triggered on by an abrupt dU/dt.
Thanks for commenting and I agree 100%. Don had the Gray tube illustrations in his archives.The Moray Valve may have operated on similar principle using the sparking capacitor.



Ged
__________________
 

Last edited by Gedfire; 06-04-2013 at 05:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9460  
Old 06-04-2013, 05:09 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
Not only XRays, but all frequencies above the UV are eligibles, the higher frequency, the higher energy.
Placing the gap nearby the secondary coil may reinforce capture and increase the efficiency. Don may have found this point experimentally by practicing. Nevertheless, all these clues seem confirming the theoretical insight about photons creation triggered on by an abrupt dU/dt.
There is no OU in this : you can also place a RF transmitter and a set of receivers and by recover part of energy spent by transmitter you would state it is OU....I saw that kind of effect with Katcher Brovin circuit when all around is full of electrostatic charge and I can recover part of energy with Avramenko plug back to power source (battery) : current consumption fallen a lot but it was still far below COP=1
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9461  
Old 06-04-2013, 05:29 PM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
OK, let's restart from the beginning.
I don't reinvent here RF emission, I'm not at this level of gullibility.
You misunderstand because so-called photons at RF level are no particle but just regular spherical waves. Furthermore mainstream physics hasn't understood this fundamental difference.

What does an abrupt dU/dt is to provoke aether compression waves (variation of the local permittivity). Compression waves are the kind of waves that serve as TEM wave reflector and that catch inside the ambient ether waves. The ambient waves are those evidenced by the Casimir force and also those that correspond to the ZPE.

Therefore, you have a net matter creation upon space under the form of high energy photons. Just capture them back and you've got OU. Theoretically you provide one 1/2h.nu per photon and space provides you the other half.
__________________
 

Last edited by quantumfuel; 06-04-2013 at 05:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9462  
Old 06-04-2013, 05:54 PM
Gedfire's Avatar
Gedfire Gedfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 472
Thought Experiment

While we are on this may I hear your thoughts on the following experiment:

Using a very still pool of water.Say 5 feet in diameter and 2 feet deep .I install several miniature linear wave generators.Say eight and put them in an regular octagonal formation say 6 inches from the centre of the said pool.I then rhythmically disturbing the centre using maybe, a tapering pendulum suspended at the end of an elastic support.Now I am taking to care to use the least energy as possible and also "tune" the "pulsings" to not oversplash and to not break the elastic support.

Given the linear wave generators are made from the best conductors, wound bifilar, have strong neodymiums, and have sufficient surfaces exposed for receiving the incoming waves would it be feasible that you may get more out than in?

Thought experimenting.(Yes, I know, I would do it myself if I had the time and resources... )

@Quantum, interesting expansion on your orginal post.Lets see where the discussion goes next.

Ged
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9463  
Old 06-05-2013, 01:14 AM
teslasmyhero teslasmyhero is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 20
Crowd Fund For Don's Tech Peek

I'm sorry if this seems a bit criminal but,I wonder if we could crowd fund a careful
techy on a trip to Japan to take a video peek into at one of the vending machines
Don's powering with one of his devices? It will be the one that's not plugged in.
__________________
 

Last edited by teslasmyhero; 06-05-2013 at 10:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9464  
Old 06-05-2013, 06:54 AM
stupify12 stupify12 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 86
You got it dude!

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
OK, let's restart from the beginning.
I don't reinvent here RF emission, I'm not at this level of gullibility.
You misunderstand because so-called photons at RF level are no particle but just regular spherical waves. Furthermore mainstream physics hasn't understood this fundamental difference.

What does an abrupt dU/dt is to provoke aether compression waves (variation of the local permittivity). Compression waves are the kind of waves that serve as TEM wave reflector and that catch inside the ambient ether waves. The ambient waves are those evidenced by the Casimir force and also those that correspond to the ZPE.

Therefore, you have a net matter creation upon space under the form of high energy photons. Just capture them back and you've got OU. Theoretically you provide one 1/2h.nu per photon and space provides you the other half.
Very nice and detailed explanation of what really is happening on tesla coil. Many thanks.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9465  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:39 AM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Tx Stupify12 and others.
I published more detailed explanations in French here.
MagnetoSynergie - Projet générateur de photons V1
I also have its English translation, just ask it.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9466  
Old 06-05-2013, 11:15 AM
African African is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarence View Post
Hello African,

Clarence ,

thanks for that info you posted, I definitely saved those items! and my personal search (me) immediately virtualized one of DON,s photos from some ones past posting ( I believe it was listed as photo C34 ) which showed TWO GDT spark GAPS attached to his demo device terminal strip for that device!!! I wish I could remember that posting so I could re-save that photo back to my pc!

All of this was interesting since the GAP experiment showed that the two combo spark gaps VS the single or three gap config. gave the way higher COP value!!!! (gigantic higher).


thanks again, mike, onward!
Hi Clarence.

Thanks you should read more about the Towsend affect and Geigher counter (hope i got spelling right) these two individuals really made some amazing discovery's, This is only my own opinion of an idea that i want to try is to have a spark gap carbon on to tungsten in a vacuum tube environment to see the effects.

As for that photo C34, i looked for it in the pages that i have saved from this thread but could not find it. I have saved from about page 100 to present.

Please realize that i am only a beginner in this and that i am nowhere close to having the knowledge that you and others have on these subjects.

Thanks again.
As always Thanks to all for Sharing
Johan
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9467  
Old 06-05-2013, 01:04 PM
African African is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.clean View Post
but im curious, wouldn't Intalek be pumped to hook up multi-kilo watt lights to really show the output?

I do think spark gaps are important, and I do hope this is true
thanks
Hi Mr Clean.

I am not sure what Intalek means but if you are asking me about what i simulated, All i can say is that i have build a circuit on a simulator that is similar to what you have done and was based on on an earlier version of a electron accumulator, The only difference is that on the earlier version i had no components values so i just used the component values from your circuit and got a better result.

I used a 555 timer with a 12V Dc power source to run it, It started of measuring 27V then it rapidly climbed to 13KV (i have never seen a simulator done this) after adding the lamps, then measured the Ac Volts it was about 235V.

My view on Spark Gaps were that i thought that it was just a safety measure until i realized that there was something like the Townsend affect and that the possibility exists that more current can be had for the taking with a spark gap.

Again this is just my opinion.

And wile i am so freely with my opinions, I saw somewhere on a site that Tesla coils was measured and found that the height was a division of the diameter by 1.618 (the golden ratio)

Best Regards to all.
And as always Thanks for Sharing
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9468  
Old 06-05-2013, 03:19 PM
Gedfire's Avatar
Gedfire Gedfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 472
English Translation Dynode Photomultipier

Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
Tx Stupify12 and others.
I published more detailed explanations in French here.
MagnetoSynergie - Projet générateur de photons V1
I also have its English translation, just ask it.
Quantumfuel,

I would like to have the english translation please.I believe this information to be very important in my understanding.

What are your thoughts on the Dynode or its composite version the Photomultipier? Glorified SparkGaps? What if I built a 5 gallon pail size Photomultiplier?

Ged
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9469  
Old 06-05-2013, 03:45 PM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
I've just uploaded the file here:
Download Project - Photons Generator v1.1a (en).pdf from Sendspace.com - send big files the easy way

Apparently Dynodes are relatively simple elements that combines Compton effects and electron acceleration by electrostatic plates. It allows multiplying photons like operational amplifiers do: it requires an external source of energy to do its job. The Compton effect itself should be more investigated at the quantum level: there is still a lot to discover and to tell about it (I noticeably think about Mills' theory).

What do you mean with "Glorified Spark Gaps"? Do you have a link?

A good idea brought up by Tesla (but it seems that a few people did understand its true interest) is to setup a magnetic field across the spark gaps, so that the ignition is switched off more rapidly. Not only you've got a strong dU/dt at the ignition but also another one at the extinction. This should double the captured energy.
__________________
 

Last edited by quantumfuel; 06-05-2013 at 04:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9470  
Old 06-05-2013, 09:46 PM
Peculian's Avatar
Peculian Peculian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
I've just uploaded the file here:
Download Project - Photons Generator v1.1a (en).pdf from Sendspace.com - send big files the easy way

Apparently Dynodes are relatively simple elements that combines Compton effects and electron acceleration by electrostatic plates. It allows multiplying photons like operational amplifiers do: it requires an external source of energy to do its job. The Compton effect itself should be more investigated at the quantum level: there is still a lot to discover and to tell about it (I noticeably think about Mills' theory).

What do you mean with "Glorified Spark Gaps"? Do you have a link?

A good idea brought up by Tesla (but it seems that a few people did understand its true interest) is to setup a magnetic field across the spark gaps, so that the ignition is switched off more rapidly. Not only you've got a strong dU/dt at the ignition but also another one at the extinction. This should double the captured energy.
Hi there QuantumFuel and welcome at this "board" !
Many thanks for the useful info you shared with us.
As for your last sentence in the quoted here post I am interested to know
what do you think or know btw about spark gaps.
example: What do you think about spark gaps; is their nature only pure electrostatic ?
Magnetic ? or a combination of the two forces ?
I have asked this question to many people but it seems no one can explain it.
From your study and knowledge you have what is your opinion on spark-gaps ?

Thanks & cheers !
__________________
<< BP Ultimate + Shell-V Power + Allies (opec) = the Ultimate Power Aligators to Suck People`s Blood !-! >>
Reply With Quote
  #9471  
Old 06-06-2013, 08:10 AM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Riemann already stated >150 years ago about magnetism, I think he had the right vision and I've no reason to contradict him.
Let's regard at the subelectric medium, since it has the capability to propagate electric excitations, its fundamental manifestation is current.
Rightly Maxwell (and Heaviside who has been left behind) did mathematically prove that current exists in two forms:
- the material current which corresponds to charge displacement
- the space current (there falsely called displacement current) which corresponds to change in the subelectric medium.
Hence the space current flow constitutes the true reference, i.e. the real inertial frame that must be considered to observe physics (please rubbish relativity and other kinds of tale).
When space current is rotating, a new force appears due to Euler change of frame. This is exactly like Coriolis forces, because the observer frame doesn't rotate with the space current. Thus simply appears the magnetic force, with explaining its vectorial product form (V X B) like the Coriolis one.
Returning to the point, a spark gap per se has nothing magnetic (or just by border effects).
What does occur in a spark gap is that the charge conservation law is challenged. As space current does exist, you also have space charges (which corresponds to vacuum polarization) and the charge conservation law does also apply there. Indeed the subelectric medium is naturally neutral and it hates perturbations due to polarization. Therefore it makes the best effort to recover its neutrality: this is the root cause of all physics.
To best relate the space charge conservation law, Lorenz gauge condition is the mathematical expression that must be universally true.
Yet you can provoke situations to thwart the space conservation law by generating strong du/dt (and also a strong current scissor = div(I) which is a path rarely explored because not intuitive). This is exactly the role played by the spark gap. My first explanation 6 months ago was that by a natural upper principle, Mother nature was forced to inject energy and to create photons in order to recover its neutrality. In the meantime, I've discovered the works of Paul Stowe who shed a new light on the behavior of the medium: above a certain frequency limit, the medium becomes compressible, meaning that the permittivity varies; this complicates the derivation of the Lorenz gauge formula and should be reconsidered in general equations (you have subsonic and supesonic set of equations similarly in aerodynamics).
Nonetheless, when permittivity varies, does the speed of light also vary and then regular TEM waves can be deviated and reflected, thus explaining why photons are seen as particles in space and why and how photons are created in the spark gap. Photons are TEM waves enclosed in a scalar wave, such as classical wave guides, their energy thus takes the form of E=h.nu. The Planck constant can therefore be explained by a topological approach, exactly as proposed Paul Stowe.
__________________
 

Last edited by quantumfuel; 06-06-2013 at 01:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9472  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:34 PM
Hobby Eon Hobby Eon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
Riemann already stated >150 years ago about magnetism, I think he had the right vision and I've no reason to contradict him.
Let's regard at the subelectric medium, since it has the capability to propagate electric excitations, its fundamental manifestation is current.
Superb writings but far to academical for normal people. I absolutely belief that bucking magnetic fields can generate o.u.
Could you give us an example of such circuitry ?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9473  
Old 06-06-2013, 05:10 PM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Sorry for my too academical style.
Physics relies first on observation, facts gathering and then hypothesis.
I've just elaborated some new hypothesis that apparently consistently match facts; this however requires experimental confirmations. Don Smith's Kapanadze's and other variants fall in this kind of confirming circuitry.

Then, let's put aside "beliefs" and "academy". I will just respond according to my understanding of things without pretending about absolute truth.

The magnetic field is not the right candidate although you may also reach interesting effects, but I guess at higher costs. Why ?

Because magnetic field corresponds to an angular momentum: in other words to the inertia of bicycle wheel. And with inertia you've got forces that oppose to brutal changes. Therefore you can pass your nerves on bucking magnet, you won't really provoke the necessary ruptures in the ambient ether. I think there may exist some shrewd solutions to pass over this difficulty. But I'm rather stupidly effective: why doing complicate when one can get it simple?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9474  
Old 06-07-2013, 03:45 PM
Hobby Eon Hobby Eon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
Sorry for my too academical style.
Physics relies first on observation, facts gathering and then hypothesis.
I've just elaborated some new hypothesis that apparently consistently match facts; this however requires experimental confirmations. Don Smith's Kapanadze's and other variants fall in this kind of confirming circuitry.
Thank you, master. I will study your pdf this weekend. But in the mean time
i would like to talk about the bucking magnetic principles. My intuďtion says that if it can be done electricly,
it can also be done magneticly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg coilsbuckingaction.jpg (22.1 KB, 69 views)
File Type: jpg Kapanadze buckingcoils .jpg (34.3 KB, 68 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9475  
Old 06-07-2013, 03:52 PM
Hobby Eon Hobby Eon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
on bucking magnet, you won't really provoke the necessary ruptures in the ambient ether. why doing complicate when one can get it simple?



Thank you for switching on a mountain of light.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9476  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:36 PM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobby Eon View Post
If it can be done electricly,
it can also be done magneticly.
Sure, that's consequence of Maxwell's theory. Just consider that magnetism is the by-effect of electricity and not the inverse.
On your schematics, I see on the left a joule thief like system. I've studied it with a friend where we tried to replicate the claims of Prof. Steven E. Jones without success. I found neither any OU replication of any joule thief right now (always curious to see one if any). We concluded that Jones got mixed up with the TEXTRONIX. Be also cautious with Naudin's publications, I also have studied him for years: he always remains fuzzy about any results, and often after digging a little more you understand that nothing special really happened.
On the right there is a KAPANADZE like system. If my predictions revealed true these kind of systems could be strongly improved in terms of efficiency.
Crossing the finger to be right, because if we have understood the secrets of Mother nature, there we have the key for the next revolution. And goodbye to nuke evils.
__________________
 

Last edited by quantumfuel; 06-07-2013 at 06:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9477  
Old 06-08-2013, 01:43 AM
Kokomoj0's Avatar
Kokomoj0 Kokomoj0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumfuel View Post
Returning to the point, a spark gap per se has nothing magnetic (or just by border effects).

I am not going to say you are outright wrong since I do not know the circumstances you said that, however we know for a fact that it has magnetic properties since we can hear it in an AM radio.

sort of a weird thread to post that in however LOL
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9478  
Old 06-08-2013, 06:32 AM
quantumfuel quantumfuel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Magnetism appears by border effects because E and B fields are strongly inter twisted, of course.

My friend Arend is maintaining an awesome article, you can find here.

He purposely reminds us an important point emphasized by Eric Dollard:
Quote:
Contrary to popular belief, the Tesla transformer is not a steady state device but is a magnifier of transient phenomena. Also it does not behave like a L. C. network nor a transmission line, but more like a unique type of wave guide. If all parts of the system are designed properly the EMF and hence dielectric flux jumps from zero to an enourmous value almost instantaneously, thereby producing an almost inconceivable displacement current into space. The transformer is then basically a device for rapidly discharging the capacitor bank nearly instantly into free space, producing an enourmous dielectric shock wave similar to a sonic boom.
Spark gaps do not produce magnetic boom, but rightly an electric boom. Don't be diverted by side-effects and focus on the true and root cause of things. This is one of the points to understand from my previous messages.

Nevertheless, I'm not here to discuss theories. I'd better like having contact with experimenters and elaborating DON SMITH system variants, so to have confirmation or not about what I'm proposing.
__________________
 

Last edited by quantumfuel; 06-08-2013 at 07:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9479  
Old 06-09-2013, 07:27 AM
Hobby Eon Hobby Eon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 88
To enrich our theoritical insights.

To enrich our theoritical insights in these technical matters.
There is confusion about the definition of bifilair. At school a power resistor has resistance wire and to counter that induction it is coiled back on itself hence bifilair. And a second coil in the same direction is just a double coil. So the flat double Tesla coil.
What can not be understood by normal people is that a non inductive bifilair coil is able to produce a voltage.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scalar1.jpg (69.6 KB, 79 views)
File Type: jpg scalar2.JPG (72.4 KB, 77 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9480  
Old 06-09-2013, 07:37 AM
Hobby Eon Hobby Eon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 88
Are these Coriolis forces ?

Are these Coriolis forces ? I cannot envision in my mind what is going on here:

!!! Free Energy Demo #2 Magnet motor.mp4 - YouTube

In my mind a magnet is some mini 'black hole' with an entry and exit that most only works on -some- metals. Yes, more mystery. But i certainly think Tesla and his fellow scientists of the time were schooled in these matters. Kelvin, Crookes and Lodge to name
a few.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers