OMG its like a the exact thing !! thanks for this

I guess eventually all roads lead to the same place eh LOL

i hear ya man, but my meter reads the slightest current on the don smith driver, and im using the same meter, its working.. and so is yours

... the 175mAh 9 volt im running on is still running the 4 lights,since about 12:00am, its 2:24am now and...still going

hehe yes, its working, anyone catch vid 5 at 3:38 where i short the load to ground and it surges 3 amps? i did that to show the needle move, but it reads 100ma just fine on the Smith suitcase driver i made.

so i know its accurate,and no sticky spots

ouch, that hurts, i dont see any sense in insulting anyone, and if we doubt something that someone says, we can ignore it.

Im a big believer that most of the good things have already been done, and just a little re-arranging can change everything.

How long has the darlington pair been around? prob longer than me, but ive never seen one with NO resistors AND 24 volts on it, AND not meltingdown!

anyway, we've come this far, i think we can keep going without hurting any feelings

Hi Mr. Clean,

Congratulations for that radiant video..even at low voltage but it prove that we can obtain a free energy...

I've been reading and follow this forum since last year and trying to digest slowly since the circuit is keep been changing or improving, but yet no result have been shown... But today..you make it man...!!.

Cheers

Sahars

How did you determine the suitcase device as a known load ?

Also since the actual power through the load is undetermined, (unless you measured it in a recent video) the efficiency can't be determined either.

We all know that lights can be lit with pulsed power more efficiently than the regular way.

To determine efficiency the load power needs to be measured as well, preferably with the same meter. Only then can a calculation be done.

If it has been done I apologize.

If the output is stepped down then rectified it can be measured with the very same meter.

Until proper measurements are done it is just conjecture really.

I don't understand how efficiency could be ascertained without in and out measurements.

Cheers

not sure about you question, but i have seen Russian dude with litterally a coil to a light jammed inside a core and it lit UP big !!!
dont know if it killed output, but it sure is active in there

and prob a resonant wave match in wire length (my best guess) but it did look pretty random, just a coil of 8 turns, then the last turn just went up the middle and to close the circuit with the light.

and if that did work, then why not save all the output for stepdown transformer,
Tesla has lots of self-exciting stuff where L2 feeds the primary circuit and "magnifies feeble currents enough to operate sensitive devices" -Tesla

AND i believe that Kapanadze got his idea from Tesla's 1899 Colorado Springs Notes book, im in posession of a copy right now, 2 INCH thick, 8.5'' x 11'' huge book....and thats only one year of experiments?!?!?!
i'll add some pics in the next vid i do

Anyway,

Hi,

Vladimir Utkin has just added one extra page to his document. It is his comments on Paul Baumann's Testatika self-powered generator and is now page 16 of his document which can be downloaded from http://www.free-energy-info.com/VladimirUtkin.pdf

Patrick

I don't see an insult in what Dynatron wrote. If you don't see the problem
with allowing unsubstantiated claims to go unchallenged fair enough. People
can take anything as an insult if they want. It's relative.

I don't understand why the transistors would burn up if there is such a minute
amount of power being used. For the transistors to get hot they would need
to be dissipating energy as radiant heat.

Do you intend to investigate the circuit and take more measurements ?

Cheers

P.S. A great many of Tesla's "sensitive" devices actually magnified/amplified signals to
allow the receiver to be operated from batteries. I think Tariel steals grid
power by way of the ground currents produced by the grid just personally. Or
it is all fake. I'm not convinced of his claims. But that's just my opinion.

..

oh jeez you are so strict about that, i really respect that,
your argument is that Maybe the meter is wrong...
...ok... but what if it's actually right

but are you saying that my meter should have some certain measurement ??
(Recall on the Smith driver i used .5 amps almost exclusively, it can read what it needs for this watt requirement)

...but you're right...

it should read 1 AMP if you put 12 watts of DC lights up to 12 Volts and a negative wire....
(please tell me that statement was correct)

...but it doesnt read one amp, or any amps...btw neither did yours.... im not sure if its "cold" electricity,
IT SEEMS TO BE JUST RINGING, AND THIS RINGING COMMUNICATES VERY WELL WITH LED BULBS

btw... coincidences are proven MATHEMATICALLY impossible

hehe but if there is one more person with this low draw, then is it a coicidence? or a patern?

All i can say is, im not new to this stuff, and i think there's something special here, not sure exactly yet,

****Right now all i know is that it lights up LED bulbs for very little current, and it helps to add some long wires to act as virtual ground

Hi mr clean,

Great stuff, really interesting video, just wondering if you have tried, or can try to run a dc motor instead of the lights to see what happens.

cheers

Well idk, i think i'll clean up these wires and make a little "lite box" for the room, and run it off one solar panel.
the panel can provide 1 amp at 15 volts, so it should be charging about 1000 times more than i need for the lights
If i can get the 24 volt setup stable, i think that would be cool.

BUT just like all the wierd theory we read, one factor that could do a lot of good in this little oscillator, would be uping the capacitance in the system
....we got volts, we got freq, now cap would help, but idk how to fire more power into L1 without charging up a cap a detonating it across a sparkgap

So i want to get back to the big spark machine

oh my 9 volt just ran out, now i can sleep, ran the 4 lights for a little over 3 hours from 175 mAh 9 volt(...not fresh) theres another calculation i guess

You see, yes you can get more lite at full wattage, but it wont last, this system just keeps the lites going longer, gotta have some value there

Do not mislead people. This man is not the inventor, and has no success in replication.

Hi folks, Hi mr clean, thanks for sharing the recent 9 volt battery test.
It looks like the 9 volt battery test was using around 50 milliamps or around 600 milliwatts to run your 4 - 3watt led lights for 3 or so hours.
Pretty darn good in my book, I am cobbling together something to try and replicate in some way.
I'm surprised lidmotor isn't jumping all over this.
peace love light
tyson

Thanks for the update Sir.Please inform Mr. Utkin that his work is highly appreciated.

Best regards,

Ged

Very interesting! Coils as inner electrode! One wire transfer of exciting activity!

- Does the Wimshurst machine excite the inner coils in self resonance?
- Can this be related to Mislavski experiment on page 10 (Utkin)? Rotating magnetic AC field inside a capacitor? In this case teh coil activity would add to heh principle of asymmetric cap.

Hi Mr Clean,
Great news with the 9 v battery I have 300 pcs in stock Kodak brand will be good for this

Have you ever tried any alternative to ground / base like am radio antenna a ring magnet from microwave or aluminum foil or water

In the Philippines using car batteries for lighting the negative is soaked in a sewer channel to save on wiring
To get 110 v ac from a 220 v ac source one live plus one wire from a rod in the ground or water pipe ( many were electrocuted bec of this)


will try the microwave transformer set up instead of ignition coil
Also is the 1 farad cap required in the circuit?????

PLEASE WORK IT OUT WITH SOLAR PANELS

THANKS FOR SHARING

TOTOALAS

i fully agree with you. We have to learn to think by ourself. Tons of drawings does not mean anything, it just hidding the true. I believe i know something about electronics and some zilano posts cant work. People,pls do just simple simulation if you dont like to build a devices.....

But at first keep your minds clear of all posts and have critical thinking. for every statement must be prove, othervise it has no a value.
A in university, for every formula we expected a prove of concept.

the system which zilano mentioned that "need a right capacitor" will probably never work. Is hard to get transformer in resonance, becouse of mutual inductance.And that inducance also depence on load on secondary side.

Better is use a modulation of main signal. something like AM modulaion in radio. hen you can use a simple filters to create a envelope, or diode capacitor, inductor system. that one you can find in some dynatron schematics as well. and also in mustafa007 device. You can be sure you cant use just simple resistor divider. If you put real power into that, it will burn out.

I believe is good to use a resonance as reactive power amplifier. then we need conversion to real power, which usually mean just phase shift, which can be done in some tank device. your extraction device should be made base on resonance type. if your resonance circuit will amplify a voltage then use a capacitor, if it will amplify a current, then use a current transformer.

of course it is just a theory. my working devices did not get COP >1 till now.

I want build a COP = 1 device a first, then hope some overunity as well.

to create a COP = 1 device, we have to eliminate a standard problems in transformers. biggest one is backEMF. becouse backEMF is always agains us, we need to remove it a first i think. i found some canadian patent about how is possible eliminate backEMF with something like guiding a magnetic flow over different path as original one.

!! Bi-toroid Transformer 1000% OU !!

Don smith device is also just a transformer, what if secret is in how to eliminate backEMF?

Hello!
I use online translator
The whole secret of Smith in the transformer izrolyatsii.
In fact the load on the secondary winding does not affect the inductance of the primary frequency of the LC and, therefore, does not change ..
The output transformer should have a large core is 5 times more than the planned output, because the primary winding of the reactive current is the phase shift of the current and voltage by 90 degrees.
Iron or metglas magnetic core is a mediator between the primary and secondary. Stores iron core magnetic field, and selects the secondary winding of the power is the core.
The transformer at 50-60 Hz on a ferrite core will not work, not enough headroom capacity. In addition, a small ferrite saturation flux density.
Here is a picture which shows Smith transformer - this is a big iron core.
The configuration of the resonant coil L1/L2 much of a difference does not, the coil may be wound with a one-way, may be an option with the winding CW-CCW-it's not so important, separation of cold electricity is due to the high-frequency, rather than winding configuration.

Attached Images

index.jpg (20.8 KB, 24 views)

Interesting view.

Some people can. I was not making an assumption but simply stating a possibility.

It is possible that her deletion of the actual post could represent a retraction of the claim until she says otherwise.

It can be for you and whoever else wants to see it like that. But I talk for me,
you talk for you, and everyone else can talk for themselves, including Zilano.
With all due respect you don't get to decide for us.

Regards

at John ,

the reason ( imho ) for the principle of asymmetry is to create a state of Anisotropy where the flow in directionally dependent ( like a siphon ) :



ps: from wikipedia

I have a lot of respect for your efforts mr clean. I'm very glad you don't take
things to heart.

The results you got from the setup are truly very impressive. I was thinking
also looking at my wave form that the battery might be experiencing some
reversals of current, I can't be sure though. Batteries don't like AC but the
caps can tolerate it I think.

Anyway I made a short video to show how two identical meters can read
different. One reads about half than the other which would mean the
difference between almost 200 mA and nothing. I was caught out by the
meter in the video a while ago. Even if the meter looks like it works fine,
a rough calibration attempt with a known load power and DC can be telling.

meters can give anomolous readings..wmv - YouTube

Even though I'm skeptical I still hunt the free energy beast .

Cheers

P.S. Before anyone jumps down my throat. I'm not trying to get on mr cleans
back. The point of jumping in and checking it out is mainly because I am
interested in sensitive oscillators I have uses in mind and also if it is catching
some free energy somehow, I wanna find out how, if I can. To do that it's
gotta be checked out.

..

A lot of the things these famous free energy identities do doesn't make much
sense. Take Tariel for example, if he has investors he is keeping secrets from
them, or they wouldn't need to give him any more money. Then it doesn't
make much sense if the investors allow all these video's to be made and
posted on the net. The reason it makes no sense to me is, if it looked too
much like the real thing to the bigger energy corps. they would buy him up in
no time, or otherwise deal with him.

What would makes make more sense to me is if Tariels "investors" were the
suppressors and they have him putting out distractions.

Any way I look at it I can't see any reason for his investors to allow the
videotaping if it is real. I can see the investors allowing the videotaping if
they weren't concerned for his safety at all or the money they invested or
getting future secrets from Tariel, if he has any. The investors could also use
his video's to raise money. And maybe never deliver. Who knows. None of it
makes much sense.

Same with Thane. I think the video's are to raise money, and the video's are
dodgey to say the least. Why would he show details of the tech he wants to
make money from ? His association with NASA is a bit sus too. If the
association is real it's sus to me, they are a government dept. and so would
immediately inform the DOE or whatever of a national security threat if his
claims are true, apparently this stuff is suppressed by the government.
The government either suppress it or they don't.That being said is
it too far out of the realms of possibility that he could work for
disinfo. He says he can "Make" energy. OMG. His setups don't produce
free energy, they just appear to.

We only need to look at the results in Overunityguide's thread to see it's a
farce, the output is only a fraction of the input. If overunityguide wasn't a
shill I would be surprised.

Here's the thread.
Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

Cheers

Thanks for your input.

What is "it" that you are referring to?

What "decision" are you referring to?

Your post here above. If you decide the above then it can be that way for you.

I get to decide for myself.

Cheers

This the first reasonable Answer what i have read after 100 Pages of Zilano Nonsense.
Does noone from you guys read the related Pdfs? Instead only listen to someone who quotes wild only from any available Doc's with no sense or shows you a cute Picture from someone?

Hi Farmhand,
your meters in the vid are OK. Nevertheless you are right in complaining their difference.
Look at the class 2.5! It says that your meter is allowed to cheat you:
2.5% at end position of 5 Amps = 125 mA.
But is gets worse. This is a constant over the whole range NOT 2.5% but 125mA.
This means that the error is:
- @2.5 Amps -> 5%
- @1.5 Amps -> 10%
- @0.75 Amps -> 20%
Perfect "guess-meter"
As we have very accuate digital meters we could decide to calibrate our analog meters quite acccurately.

On the other hand we could decide to buy some old analog multimeters. 1% DC / 1.5% AC were quite usual. Apart that they can be switched to different ranges. If we measure in the upper quarter of the range they are suffitiently accurate.

Thank for offering your input.

The meaning of that quote is the possibility still exists that Zilano's deletion of the actual post could represent a retraction of the claim until she says otherwise.

I simply stated a possibility, not a decision.