Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube ONLY 13% OF SEATS AVAILABLE!!!*** 2017 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***


* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #4231  
Old 04-28-2013, 02:43 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by aljhoa View Post
'Kill the poor to balance budget''
Yahoo!7 Finance – Wed, Apr 17, 2013 10:21 AM AEST

"A modest cull would strike at the root of ...dilemma,"
Yahoo! Finance
Matthew Grimm and the Red Smear, Kill the Poor - YouTube

Welcome to Hufflepuff - YouTube

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #4232  
Old 04-29-2013, 12:25 PM
5150's Avatar
5150 5150 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Near downtown
Posts: 273
Interesting Read

Identity of the Khaki Wearing Boston Bombing Operatives Revealed

Identity of the Khaki Wearing Boston Bombing Operatives Revealed



also another good read for a counter balance

BOSTON: IRRESPONSIBLE, DISGUSTING CONSPIRACY THEORIES


Devvy Kidd -- Boston: Irresponsible, disgusting conspiracy theories

______________________

MILLER: Finally some answers about the Sandy Hook school shooting


MILLER: Finally some answers about the Sandy Hook school shooting - Washington Times
__________________
 

Last edited by 5150; 04-29-2013 at 12:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4233  
Old 04-29-2013, 04:39 PM
Mad Scientist Mad Scientist is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 563
So let’s see the author states that she has checked the official records and has determined that these were real government people and therefore the “official” story must be correct. Well I guess that settles it, what more can be said?

http://i.imgur.com/ibQIl1P.jpg
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4234  
Old 04-29-2013, 04:59 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Thanks for the links, 5150. I have always regarded Devvy Kidd highly for her investigative journalism, and agree with just about everything she says in the linked column - excepting the facts concerning flight 93. I think she's been hoodwinked on that one. But as far as Boston goes, I think she's on the right path. There definitely were two explosions near the Boston Marathon finish line, and those explosions were obviously of enough force to kill or severely injure bystanders who were in close proximity to the devices. The idea that the blasts, and resultant injuries, were somehow faked isn't very credible. As with a lot of other Internet postings, I see this sort of thing as intentional disinfo reporting. It is unfortunate, because a lot of people latch on to these reports believing they are truth, when in fact they are no more true than a lot of what the mainstream media tells us. A lot of people run with, and repost the disinfo stuff, and when this is later debunked as b.s. then it has the intended effect of casting doubt over any and all other conspiracy theories regarding the incident. There are obviously a great many unanswered questions about the Boston events, including what and when the federal agencies knew, and what involvement the Tsarnaev brothers actually had in all of this. Did the brothers hatch and carry out this plan alone, or did they have help? If they did have help, who helped them? Were the brothers simply used as patsy's to take the blame for the events while actually having little or nothing to do with them? I was very surprised when the younger brother was captured alive, as I thought he would surely end up with a bullet to the head to prevent him from talking. We are told that he did talk to fed investigators, and that he admitted involvement in the bombings. Of course those reports may, or may not, be true. We haven't seen video of his interrogation and confession, so anything we are told should be taken with a grain of salt. Now that Dzhokhar has been Mirandized, he won't be saying much of anything, even if and when he goes to court, as his lawyer will have Dzhokhar plead the Fifth, and anything he did actually say before being Mirandized will be inadmissible during his trial. A rather clever way of silencing the young lad, wouldn't you say? If he isn't given the death sentence then he will likely live out his life in solitary confinement to "protect" him from other inmates, and that's the last we will hear of him.

To me, the most serious question remaining unanswered is who the "naked man" actually was. It is rather obvious that police at least suspected that man as being one of the reported terrorists, and feared that he might have an explosive device, such as a suicide vest, beneath his clothing. The man was ordered to remove all his clothing and then placed in a police cruiser until FBI agents arrived. After being allowed to don a shirt and pants, the FBI agents removed the man from the cruiser and took him over to a wall where they shined flashlights on him, took photos, and talked to him for a period of time. That was all seen, but no one appears to know what happened afterwards, and that's what I'd like to know. Was the man determined to be an innocent passer-by and released, or was he determined to be Tamerlan Tsarnaev? If the latter is the case, then when and how did Tamerlan receive his mortal wounds? If the former is the case, then who was the naked dude, and why hasn't he told his story to news reporters?

If you Google, "Who was the naked man arrested after the Boston bombings?", there are 98 million results. No one would have the time to look at all of these, but most seem to have a similar slant - "Police say the naked man arrested in Boston was not Tamerlan Tsarnaev." Everything about this seems to have ended 5 to 7 days ago, with the only opposing viewpoint remaining to be the claim by Tamerlan's aunt that she's "100% certain" that Tamerlan was the naked man. Another report attributed to the authorities says the naked man was actually a Chinese man, but that doesn't seem credible to me. And still another report attributed to police says that the naked man was actually the man who the Tsarnaev brothers had carjacked. That man appears to be the one laying on the ground in the below photo, but does not resemble the naked man:

While the man shown above would not appear to resemble the naked man, Tamerlan Tsarnaev most certainly does. In earlier still photos taken from video, the naked man's facial features are not all that distinguishable due to the darkness of the pictures, but when lightened as shown below, the hair and hairline is a perfect match for Tamerlan, and certainly not a match to the man lying on the ground in the previous photo:

__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff
Reply With Quote
  #4235  
Old 04-29-2013, 05:10 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Scientist View Post
So let’s see the author states that she has checked the official records and has determined that these were real government people and therefore the “official” story must be correct. Well I guess that settles it, what more can be said?

http://i.imgur.com/ibQIl1P.jpg
Right on, MS! Just because the men have been "identified" as belonging to a National Guard group, is that supposed to quiet any suspicions of their possible involvement? Heck, does anyone remember who killed the four dead students in Ohio that Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young sang about? It was the National Guard.

And even though some information is being released now about Sandy Hook, who's to say that information is true when there is so much that doesn't add up, and so much that was obviously covered up?
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff
Reply With Quote
  #4236  
Old 04-30-2013, 04:01 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
Perhaps it is a universal truth
that the loss of liberty at home
is to be charged against provisions against danger,
real or pretended from abroad.

James Madison - Wikiquote

7/7 Setup - YouTube

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4237  
Old 05-01-2013, 06:56 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
I recently wrote about a presidential eligibility case that is to be heard in the Alabama Supreme Court, where judge Roy Moore is chief justice. The Alabama Democrat party has now filed an amicus curiae brief with the court seeking to have the case dismissed. “Stated simply,” the brief reads, “there is absolutely nothing any Alabama court can do to change the reality of President Obama’s election to a second term in office. … No Alabama court has the authority to delve into the legality, conduct or results of that election.” The brief also claims that the case, which was brought against Barry by 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, amounts to a “baseless attack,” Obama being the “object of [their] scorn” and their intent being “a jaundiced and jaded political agenda.” In an effort to discredit the plaintiffs and label them as tin hat conspiracy theorists, the brief states, “In order for one to accept the claim that President Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery, one has to buy into a conspiracy theory so vast and byzantine that it sincerely taxes the imagination of reasonable minds.”

This of course is standard operating procedure whenever Barry's protectors want to see a case dismissed for supposedly having no merit. Judge Roy Moore, and at least one other justice, Tom Parker, aren't likely to allow the case to be dismissed so easily, though. Moore said in a 2010 interview concerning Barry's eligibility that, “This is the strangest thing indeed. The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.” And justice Parker wrote a concurrence to the 2012 case now being appealed, saying, “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

This case could well be the one that succeeds where all others have failed, and the court could rule in favor of the plaintiff's original request that the Alabama Secretary of State be caused to review Barry's eligibility as a presidential candidate on the 2012 Alabama ballot based upon receipt of a certified copy of his bona-fide birth certificate. If Barry even has a bona-fide certificate then it certainly doesn't look like the forgery he put up on the White House website, so it will be interesting to see what Barry tries to foist upon us this time around if there's no way for him to avoid disclosure.
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff
Reply With Quote
  #4238  
Old 05-01-2013, 09:04 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295


If you're old enough to remember Nikita Khrushchev telling Americans that, "We will bury you!," then you will understand both the humor and the appropriateness of the above poster.
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff
Reply With Quote
  #4239  
Old 05-02-2013, 02:22 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
TMTCTMTSTS

Cinderella - The More Things Change - YouTube

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4240  
Old 05-02-2013, 05:04 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Exclamation Alert! Please read and sign the NO NATIONAL ID petition today!

No National ID Petition to:
My U.S. Representative and Senators

Whereas: Governments that truly want to protect liberty have no need to track the every move of their citizens; and
Whereas: Privacy from government is a chief cornerstone of our liberties, enshrined in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and
Whereas: In the past, many Members of Congress, instead of taking steps to actually end our illegal immigration problem, have chosen instead to use the issue to dramatically expand government intrusion into our lives; and
Whereas: The so-called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" proposal being touted by Senators Chuck Schumer and John McCain includes a de facto National ID card that would be required for all U.S. citizens in order to hold a job legally; and
Whereas: Biometric scanning technology would be included in the card, which could allow government bureaucrats to track citizens' every move.
Therefore: I urge you to oppose any legislation requiring U.S. citizens to obtain a National ID card just to get a job - or any other bill that would establish a National ID card that includes biometric scanning or tracking devices.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to this link to sign the petition. Thanks!

The national ID scheme is just one really bad part of the more than 800 pages of legislation that the 'Gang Of 8' is attempting to impose upon us under the guise of "Immigration Reform." Did you know that this "Immigration Reform" legislation would give immediate amnesty to 11 million illegal aliens, issue work permits to them at a time when over 20 million legal aliens and U.S. citizens are without jobs, and will immediately qualify the 11 million illegals as eligible for welfare handouts? Actually, they are already eligible for free medical care, and are allowed to apply for Food Stamp benefits without need for divulging their illegal status. The US Department of Agriculture actually distributes a pamphlet to communities in Mexico telling Mexican citizens how to go about applying. Now isn't that insane?
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 05-02-2013 at 05:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4241  
Old 05-04-2013, 01:19 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
It can be tough trying to wake the sheeple




__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 05-04-2013 at 01:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4242  
Old 05-04-2013, 02:01 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickoff View Post
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to this link to sign the petition. Thanks!




WATERTOWN, MA -- On Friday, April 19, 2013, the small Boston suburb of Watertown was completely locked down. Governor Deval Patrick ordered that people stay in their homes and that businesses close, as droves of police and soldiers closed down the city. Roads were blocked off, vehicles were prohibited from driving on the roads. Trains, buses, and public transportation was shut down. Anyone caught on the streets would be accosted and searched without probable cause. A No-Fly Zone was imposed overhead. No civilians were allowed in or out of the lockdown zone. National guard soldiers were photographed checking pedestrians' IDs on the sidewalks. The streets were empty, except for armored police vehicles and military Humvees.
Systematic House-to-House Raids in Locked-Down Watertown, Massachusetts - YouTube

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4243  
Old 05-08-2013, 02:19 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
By PABLO GORONDI Associated Press
BUDAPEST, Hungary May 6, 2013 (AP)

Much of the recent trouble began with Hungary's 2010 election,
when disillusioned voters made the extremist right-wing party Jobbik
the third-largest force in Parliament. Though Jobbik doesn't have the power to pass laws,
it gained a stage for its anti-Semitic — and anti-Gypsy — rhetoric.

Jobbik lawmaker Marton Gyongyosi called last year for lists to be drawn up
of government members and lawmakers with Jewish origins,
claiming they could present a "national security risk."

Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress,
says "there is much more Jewish life but there's also more hatred,
more anti-Semitism" in Hungary.

"If Hungary had less anti-Semitism, it could blossom," Lauder said.

Jewish Meeting Highlights Anti-Semitism in Hungary - ABC News

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4244  
Old 05-08-2013, 03:44 PM
dutchdivco dutchdivco is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,000
Benghazi ain't going away

It appears like, anyway. Hearings are being 'held', and THIS time it looks like debate/questioning WON'T be limited to 5 minutes, and the repubs are going to try to hang Hillary, in particular, and Admin in general.

Should make for some good T.V. 'soundbites', at least! Hillaries "What does it matter!" outburst is going to hang around her neck, if she tries for a run in 2016! Repubs are said to have 'whistleblowers' prepared to 'tell all' about what happened. Nothing stink quite so much as a coverup, and Benghazi stinks to high heaven! Jim
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4245  
Old 05-08-2013, 11:46 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Yes, Jim, the Benghazi sham stinks really bad. The hearings will be interesting, I'm sure. Three whistle blowers will be telling it like it really was. The whistle-blowers said set to testify include Gregory Hicks, a foreign service officer and former deputy chief of mission/chargé d’affairs in Libya, and Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant secretary for counter-terrorism at the Department of State. Eric Nordstrom, a diplomatic security officer and former regional security officer in Libya, will also testify.


I'm sure that TPTB will do all they can to minimize the damages that will be caused by these people, and the MSM will barely say anything about it. It seems they are already focusing all of their attention on the Jody Arias trial outcome, and on the three women who were held captive for ten years by someone named Castro. Hmmm, I wonder if there's a connection to Fidel. Or is he an InFidel?
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 05-10-2013 at 11:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4246  
Old 05-09-2013, 01:53 PM
gene gene gene gene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 257
I watched much of the Benghazi hearings yesterday on C-SPAN, which stands for cable satellite public affairs network. C-SPAN is a good network to watch if you want to view real time government proceedings. I thought the hearings were to be continued today, but could not find it scheduled at Live Video - C-SPAN3 | C-SPAN

It seems that many of the speakers did not have papers and documents of importance supplied before hand. Perhaps the Dems need some time to study so they can put their spin on them.

In the hearings it seemed that the dems were blaming everything on the budget and the fact that there could not have been a timely response by aircraft to the attack, and to this I say better late than never. How did they know how long the fight would go on??

The questions from the repubs were more focused on who was responsible, and why actions were not taken.

I believe It was Gregory Hicks who said that many requests were made for more security at the embassy but had been denied.
Gene
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4247  
Old 05-10-2013, 03:10 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
Stephen Hawking

8 May 2013
Last updated at 12:44 ET

"The academic boycott against Israel is in our view outrageous and improper, certainly for someone for whom the spirit of liberty lies at the basis of his human and academic mission," conference chairman Israel Maimon said in a statement.

The Israeli Ambassador in London said it was a shame Prof Hawking would not be attending.
"Rather than caving into pressure from political extremists, active participation in such events is a far more constructive way to promote progress and peace," he said.

But Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain of Maidenhead Synagogue said: "As someone who admires Stephen Hawking enormously, it is so disappointing that he is letting political arguments prevent academic discourse.

BBC News - Stephen Hawking boycotts major Israel conference


By Mendy Finkel
Published May 09, 2013

When I first read that the preeminent physicist, Stephen Hawking, had joined the boycott of Israeli academics, I thought to myself, “good for him.”

Surprisingly, with the exception of his Israel boycott, I could not find any instances of Mr. Hawking boycotting or even speaking out against other nations in the Middle East.

But fine, Mr. Hawking has no responsibility to monitor the suffering of the entire Middle East; it’s really just the suffering of Palestinians that he’s concerned with. And it’s no secret that the current governing administrations in the Palestinian territories have an atrocious human rights record, with the persecution of gays, religious minorities and women among its leading offenses.

Stephen Hawking’s double standard | Fox News

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4248  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:29 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Quotable quote of the day......


"We can't solve problems by using the same kind

of thinking we used when we created them. "

-- Albert Einstein

Einstein was right, and this concept is so self-evident that you would think everyone in Congress would understand that illegal alien amnesty, with talk of tightening up border security and passing legislation to limit the hiring of illegals, will have no positive effect. This was already tried in the 1986 "Immigration Reform and Control Act," which was touted as the cure-all that would put an end to illegal immigration. That was a Demonrat plan approved by a Demonrat House and Senate and signed into law by Ronny 'Raygun.' Initially that only amnestied 3 million illegals, but the total was 16 million by the time Bush #1 and Clinton left office. The 1986 Act probably would have worked if language to impose harsh penalties on employers of illegals had not been stripped out before passage.

The "Gang of Eight"wants to cram their "Immigration Reform" proposal down the throats of the American public. Make no mistake - this proposal has nothing whatever to do with real reform. At a time when 20 million legal US workers are out of work, it is insane to propose a plan that would legalize 33 million otherwise illegal aliens within the next decade, but that is exactly what the plan is. Initially, 11 million or more illegals would be granted immediate amnesty, issued work visas, and become immediately eligible for free medical care, food stamps, and a host of other welfare programs. Studies have shown that it would be far less costly to US taxpayers to simply enforce the existing laws regarding illegals, and deport them. The Demonrats, of course, are all for amnesty because those who are amnestied will forever be grateful to the Demonrat party in future elections. The Rebuttlickans are just as bad, as they are quite likely to cave in on this amnesty for fear of further alienating Hispanic voters. There is little doubt that they will do everything they can to sell Marco Rubio to Hispanics as the best thing since burritos, and as the best candidate for President in the 2016 elections, despite the fact that he is no more constitutionally eligible than Barry. The Rebuttlickan party hopes that by moving farther left in their ideology they will somehow capture enough votes to win in 2016, but that is irrational thinking. Those who want to be given free handouts for the rest of their lives are well aware that it is the Demonrat party which has historically made this possible, and we already have 47% of the people living off the labors of the other 53%. This amnesty is the tipping point that will put welfare recipients into the majority, and forever ensure a one-party system, putting the final nail in the coffin of liberty.
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 05-10-2013 at 07:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4249  
Old 05-11-2013, 02:51 PM
dutchdivco dutchdivco is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,000
Rick

I DO agree with much of what you say. The Rebuttlickens have tried to 'appear' hard on immigration and amnesty, by focusing on 'Border enforcement', and establishing certain 'benchmark' measurements of border security effectiveness, as a condition for anmnetsy; this is all a 'smokescreen', the KEY weakness of the 1986 law was that, as you say, WORKPLACE enforcement was weakened, in the law, and further weakened in enforcement; Immigration Dept. was pressured by congress, (at the behest of Chamber of commerce and similar lobbying groups) to concentrate enforcement on the 'illegals', and leave businesses alone, except for the occasional 'show' raid, on chicken processing plants, etc.

This is in line with the oft heard "we CAN'T deport 11 million people!" argument; and the ONLY thing Romoney ever said that I agree with, although they made it appear that THIS is why he lost; IF illegals can't get work in the U.S., they will 'self-deport', or won't bother coming here (illegally) in the first place.We don't need to spend 10's of billions of tax dollars on contracts for sophisticated electronics, etc. (many of which have been found to not work, and undoubtedly many of these Rebuttlicken Congressmen got campaign contributions for voting for!); if we had effective workplace enforcement, we would get far more 'bang for our buck'; a National law, like the Az. law, only that was worded so as to eliminate the word 'Knowingly'; in order for Sheriif Joe and the State attorney to prosecute a company for hiring illegals, they have to be able to PROVE that the company was 'knowingly' hiring illegals.

Don't have to meet such a high burden of proof for many other crimes; "Oh, we can't PROVE you 'knowingly' were robbing a bank, commiting a Terrorist attack, etc. so we are not going to prosecute!" IF all employers were required to submit every employer to E-verify, (or face prosecution), and if a small portion of the $ spent on 'Border security' were instead spent on building up the E-verify system to handle the increased 'traffic', Border patrol could concentrate on true security issues, as the flood accross the border would become a 'trickle'.

As you said in your first post of this thread, you don't watch much T.V., or Lamestream media coverage. It was interesting to see the Benghazi coverage this week! On Wed. nite, they DID cover the hearings and showed maybe 30 seconds of testimony by the #2 man at the embassy, Mr. Hicks, and then showed a 'outburst' by a democrtatic committee member, in which he was making it clear he was NOT directing his comment to the witness, but to the Repub members of the committee, and basically saying 'this is all just politics'.

Impression left for viewers was this is all just 'more of the same old sh*t; Repubs and Dems fighting. BUT, on Thurs. and Friday, after the e-mails were released, I saw on both NBC and PBS nightly news, clear concessions that its OBVIOUS; it was the STATE department, and NOT the CIA, that was 'scrubbing' the 'talking points' to remove any reference to Terrorism and Al Quaida, etc., and that there motive was clearly 'perception', NOT keeping info 'top secret' for any security reason. Saw at least one reporter saying that Petraius, (head of the CIA) was 'upset' and adamantly opposed to the 'scrubbing', and will probably be called to testify; Hillie will be back testifying again as well, and her "What does it matter" argument ISN't going to work, next time! This may well torpedo ANY Presidential bid for her, in 2016!

Coarse it is all theater, and i've given up a long time ago on trying to come to any definite conclusions as to what 'they' are really trying to do, but I DO think Benghazi is going to continue to stink. Jim
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4250  
Old 05-11-2013, 03:54 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post
Boney M - Rivers of Babylon 1978 - YouTube

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4251  
Old 05-11-2013, 06:26 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by dutchdivco View Post
I DO think Benghazi is going to continue to stink.
No doubt about that, Jim, and here's why. Let's take a look at the actual Benghazi incident timeline, which was taken by Doug Ross from information culled by Stephen Hayes and the House Oversight Committee:



Notice that Ambassador Stevens called Hicks immediately after the first shots were fired, to advise him of the attack in progress, and that Hicks obviously called the State Department and Department of Defense (DOD) quickly, because in just 19 minutes after the attack began the DOD ordered a drone surveillance aircraft to be positioned over the attack site. Just 6 minutes after that, Barry's White House and Pentagon Brass were notified of the ongoing attack - by an e-mail message sent from the State Department! Good grief, wouldn't it have been much quicker to make a conference call to the White House and Pentagon? Regardless, it would be foolishness to think that Barry was not personally briefed on the situation by 4:05 pm that afternoon, the time the e-mail was sent. And just one hour later, at 5:06 pm - while Barry, Bite-em, and Panetta were meeting at the White House, the State Department sent another e-mail saying that Ansar al-Sharia, a Muslim extremist militia group, claimed responsibility for the attack. So roughly an hour before dinner time on the day of the incident, Barry, Bitem, Panetta, and obviously Hillie too, knew this was a terrorist attack and knew the terrorist group that was responsible. Incredibly, Hillie is announcing, just 4 hours after learning the actual facts, that an Internet video had incited an angry mob to carry out this violence, and it is not until 11 days later that White House spokesman Carney admits this was a terrorist attack. Pay special attention to the fact that the timeline indicates that General Ham was relieved of his AFRICOM command position on October 18, some 37 days after the Benghazi incident. Actually that is pure bull. It may be the day he was "officially" relieved, but as I stated in post #3554 on November 14th, Ham was actually relieved of his command at gunpoint on the day of the attack, with the reason being that he was refusing to obey the order to "stand down." Ham had learned of the ongoing attack and had ordered a rapid response team to respond to it when the order came from higher up to restrain Ham and stop the rescue mission. I'd say that we especially need to hear testimony from Ham and determine exactly who gave the stand-down order. Then we need to hear from that person as to where that order actually came from, and trace back to determine who was the originator. The order most likely came to General Ham from the Pentagon, but at who's request? Leon Panetta, Hillie, Barry? These are questions that must be answered, and make all else look like small stuff. As mentioned in the above linked post #3554, whoever issued the stand down order, and resultantly aided the enemy in carrying its attack to completion, is guilty of treason. It is high time that the perp was unmasked and held accountable.

As Doug Ross says of the above information,

"It is now clear to me that:

a) Hillary Clinton lied under oath to Congress.
b) Barack Obama went to sleep knowing that a U.S. Ambassador and other Americans were under terrorist attack.
c) Barack Obama awoke refreshed the next day to begin fundraising.
d) The entire Executive Branch lied repeatedly to the American people to save Obama's chances for reelection.

Could someone drag John Boehner out of whatever bar he's in, wake him up, and let him know: There is more than enough material for impeachment proceedings to begin and criminal charges levied against Hillary Clinton."
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 05-11-2013 at 08:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4252  
Old 05-12-2013, 02:18 PM
dutchdivco dutchdivco is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,000
Also on Benghazi

Dems disinfo has also tried to say lack of responce to security requests was because repubs 'blocked' funding for emabassy security. And THIS was 'reported' in lamestream. But I ALSO saw reports which made it clear this is B.S., and there WAS sufficient funding to provide security for the Benghazi mission. It seems the reasons why the security requests were denied had more to do with 'maintaining a small footprint', than anything to do with funding.
Yes, need to hear from gen. Ham, who gave the order to 'stand down', and WHY, and who ordered him relieved of his command at gunpoint, and WHY!

There are only a few people with the authority, right? And it seems like the main players were aware of what was happening, and were talking, but their focus was on how to 'spin' the situation, rather than how to DEAL with it. Shameful disgrace, and lots of heads SHOULD roll, for this!

I'm not sure this rises to the point of impeachable offence, YET. Leave Boerner in his bar, but what comes out by following the trail, questioning Gen. Ham under oath in a public hearing, etc. and building a case to bring 'Whats it matter?' Hillie back for a serious grilling, may well lead to,....Oh, crap! I forgot about O'bummers 'insurance policy'; Bitem! Whatever we do, musn't impeach O'bummer, until Bitem can be included. The only thing that could be worse than O'bummer as Pres., would be Bitem as Pres.!

Come to think of it, its 'open secret' that Bitem wants to run in 2016. If this does indeed torpedo Hillie, it leaves an opening for Bitem. Coarse, if he is 'tarred' with the same brush,....actually, the Dems ARE 'due' to lose in 2016, no matter who they run, if you look at recent history; Bush 1 following Reagan is the only time I can think of, where a 2 (full) term with one party in the W.H. was followed immediately by a third.

Not that I'm terribly excited by ANY potential candidate for Repub, in 2016. I suppose MAYBE I could get a LITTLE excited about Rand Paul, but I suspect party won't allow him to get close to the nomination.Jim
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4253  
Old 05-12-2013, 02:55 PM
Mad Scientist Mad Scientist is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 563

Quote:
Originally Posted by dutchdivco View Post
Yes, need to hear from gen. Ham, who gave the order to 'stand down', and WHY, and who ordered him relieved of his command at gunpoint, and WHY!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4254  
Old 05-12-2013, 04:57 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Just to see what kind of drivel is currently being promoted by CNN, I took a quick look this morning while having some coffee. I was disgusted to see them showing something that looked like one of those Saturday Night Live comedy spoofs in which 'Congressional investigators' looking into Benghazi were questioning 'Jodi Arias.' Jody is understood to be a compulsive liar of course, besides being a murderer. The 'question' being asked came from 'Darrel Issa,' and was something like "Do you know what group is responsible for the Benghazi attack?" The answer from 'Jodi' was something like "You already know that was Ansar al-Sharia, so what is the purpose of this questioning?" And to that, 'Issa' simply gets a stupefied look on his face as everyone laughs, including the reporters showing the clip on CNN.

It disgusts me that CNN would stoop so low as to show this clip. There's nothing funny about it, unless you happen to be Barry, or someone in his administration. Clearly the purpose of showing this was to promote the idea to the public that the Benghazi investigation is simply a political witch-hunt, and that Issa is a complete moron for asking stupid questions about something that's already been looked into. Made me want to barf.
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff
Reply With Quote
  #4255  
Old 05-12-2013, 11:12 PM
jdodson's Avatar
jdodson jdodson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 183
Your right rickoff that is disgusting and pathetic.

Innocent people were murdered both by terrorists and by jodi
What kind of sick people make a laughing joke out of those situations.

Truly disgusting.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4256  
Old 05-13-2013, 03:29 AM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdodson View Post
Your right rickoff that is disgusting and pathetic.

Innocent people were murdered both by terrorists and by jodi
What kind of sick people make a laughing joke out of those situations.

Truly disgusting.
What is a never-ending story
intended for "washing" and soap selling?


Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4257  
Old 05-13-2013, 01:26 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by aljhoa View Post
What is a never-ending story
intended for "washing" and soap selling?
Hmmm let's see........... isn't that the "official" government explanation to every matter of public concern or protest?
__________________
"Seek wisdom by keeping an open mind to alternative realities, questioning authority, and searching for truth. Only then, when you see or hear something that has 'the ring of truth' to it, will it be as if a veil has been lifted, and suddenly you will begin to hear and see far more clearly than ever before." - Rickoff

Last edited by rickoff; 05-13-2013 at 01:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4258  
Old 05-16-2013, 02:59 PM
gene gene gene gene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 257
Hi Rick,

Any update on the Alabama supreme court, eligibility case? It was over 2 wks ago when you posted about it.

More scandalous activities, this time its the I.R.S. !!!!!

McConnell: IRS Can't Be Trusted to Implement Obamacare

Earlier this week, the senator demanded the resignation of IRS Acting Director Steven Miller, who admitted that he had known about the singling out of conservative groups with such words as "tea party" and "patriot" in their names since last May.

McConnell tells Newsmax that the current IRS controversy is yet another effort by the Obama White House to suppress those who oppose its policies. He cites moves by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius regarding Obamacare.

"During the debate, she sent out a directive to the health insurance companies telling them they couldn’t send a letter to their policyholders giving them their impression of the impact of Obamacare on premiums," he says. "Now, the same secretary is shaking down those companies for contributions to a fund that will apparently pay for ads to be beamed at the American people trying to convince them that they should like Obamacare."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com McConnell: IRS Can't Be Trusted to Implement Obamacare
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

If you or I were to pull something like this in our business, we would be jailed for sure. All these people do is resign, most likely with an under the table bonus, only to be replaced by the next appointed, bought and paid for puppet in line.
Our government is so corrupt that I feel all our efforts are in vain.

Regards, Gene

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com McConnell: IRS Can't Be Trusted to Implement Obamacare
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4259  
Old 05-16-2013, 03:00 PM
5150's Avatar
5150 5150 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Near downtown
Posts: 273
Quote:
I think it’s time to lynch one of those *******s and set an example. You don’t like our government? Then move the **** out of the country! God they piss me off.

Ok thats a quote from the article and was a response posted on a Facebook page regarding these Robin Hooders..

A group of self-styled Robin Hoods who scamper around the streets of a New Hampshire city and feed expired parking meters for strangers has been hit with a harassment lawsuit.

here is the link to the article

'Robin Hoods' who feed parking meters are hit with lawsuit in New Hampshire - U.S. News

and here is a link to their website

Free Keene



_________________________

My thoughts on this are that these Robin Hooders are basically standing up and using a peaceful for of activism to say NO more Abuse! They are basically preventing the city from collecting fees for tickets. I think it's great!

In regards tot he argument they are harassing or causing issues... I think this is just BS to have a way to sue them and get a court order for them to stop. so..lesson learned.. in the future anyone doing this type fo stuff elsewhere needs to just go quietly about heir business and pay the meters without speaking to or confronting the meter maids.

I wish there were many more examples of this kind of stuff all over but the system is set up so they will collect revenue and put a stop to most people who want to stand up.

As for the comment by the person who said if someone doesn't like the government they can get the heck out of the country, well I I just have to shake my head at such an ignorant statement like that.

What do you guys think of this story and the idea of peaceful activism like this?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4260  
Old 05-16-2013, 03:23 PM
gene gene gene gene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 257
Hi 5150,

Your post made me laugh. Thanks I needed that.

Obama would like us to believe that he is the Robin Hood of health care, but he is in fact the prince of thieves.

Now if one of these Robin Hood guys or gals would like to pay my taxes, OK sign me up. LOL

Best to you, Gene
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers