I remember myself almost a year ago, logging into this forum in the hope of obtaining free energy with humble materials.

I had read Bedini's comments concerning free energy with the illustration of devices primitive and stupid plain ones.

I begun, as many of us here with SSG. In spite of various testimonies that we obtain FE there, it turned out to be bull...
Then, we are told it is not Ou there.. More sophistikated systems are OU, not the old plain SSG. Various other devices claiming OU are more than proven a pile of bull...
Old and new ones same thing. no matter what you try, as told, no OU there.
I haven't meet a single trustworthy man to have reach OU here.

....

To me, a Harvard professor preaching OU cannot exist, i would not believe him, and i would consider him a illuminati (say) puppet.
On the contrary, the very people claiming OU via dumb devices and proven THOROUGHLY are not, make the perfect illustration that OU is not there.
....

In any case, OU can or cannot be manifested, the methods described by Bedini and others are plain disinformation and have not the slight potential of OU gaining.

I may displease some people and Bedini fans here. But lets face the facts. have you got ou? Hell no. Wake up. this kind of religion without proofs contradicts my scientific reasoning.

Stop buying DVDs of psedoscience. It maybe nice for pop-corn cola and sofa case, but full of bull for practical use.

Last and not least, when more than 1000 times asked kindly invetors to help out and an ou machine to be made by a third party, Chinise wisdom, big oil assassins threats and UFO conspiracies are claimed not to do so. As if they can in the first place.

The same "inventors" have set a whole industry based on us selling a lot of trinkets and "alternative" kind of stuff not which doing anything the alternate really.

I here stop my case.
Have fun playing with transistors, coils and magnets but forget OU there.


Sincerely
Baroutologos

ps: the one who likes to argue must have attained Ou himself

The expression perpetual motion, or perpetuum mobile, arose historically in connection with the quest for a mechanism which, once set in motion, would continue to do useful work without an external source of energy or which would produce more energy than it absorbed in a cycle of operation. This type of motion, now called perpetual motion of the first kind, involves only one of the three distinct concepts presently associated with the idea of perpetual motion.

Perpetual motion of the first kind refers to a mechanism whose efficiency exceeds 100%. Clearly such a mechanism violates the now firmly established principle of conservation of energy, in particular that statement of the principle of conservation of energy embodied in the first law of thermodynamics. (Indeed, the first law of thermodynamics is sometimes stated as “A perpetuum mobile of the first kind cannot exist.”). See also Conservation of energy.

Perpetual motion of the second kind refers to a device that extracts heat from a source and then converts this heat completely into other forms of energy, a process which satisfies the principle of conservation of energy. A dramatic scheme of this type would be an ocean liner, which extracts heat from the nearly limitless oceanic source and then uses this heat for propulsion. This type of perpetual motion is, however, precluded by the second law of thermodynamics which is sometimes stated as “A perpetuum mobile of the second kind cannot exist.”

The third type of perpetual motion is, in contrast to the two types described above wherein useful output was the goal, merely a device which can continue moving forever. It could result in actual systems if all mechanisms by which energy is dissipated could be eliminated. Since experience indicates that dissipative effects in mechanical systems can be reduced, by lubrication in the case of friction, for example, but not eliminated, mechanical perpetual motion of the third kind can be approximated but never achieved. An example of a genuine case of this kind occurs in a superconductor. If a direct current is caused to flow in a superconducting ring, this current will continue to flow undiminished in time without application of any external force. See also Superconductivity.

you've said yourself that very few people actaully stick to the original plans... I know you are guilty of that as well...

And have you tried using conditioned batteries yet I doubt that you have rigourously conditioned your batteries in that short time.

Dear sheph,

I have tried everything and anything. No ou anyway. no ou could be in this way
Unless you have other experience


Regards,
Baroutologos

I do have other experience. I can not claim that I have ever achieved greater than COP1 in regards to the charging battery, though a fan I modified (which I was told was between 75 - 85% efficient to begin with) performed 8 times more mechanical work then the original fan could with the same batteries. This is interesting, but not proof.

Though I can not explain why the batteries charge as fast as they do when the power they are recieving is so low. when performing the load tests, the energy that ends up in the batteries far exceeds the energy that was being output by the oscillator. Usually many times greater.

That's evidence enough for me to keep going.

Your main complaint seems to be against Mr. Bedini.

Anyone who has read his story must come to the conclusion he won't show us anything really worth-while as far as over-unity is concerned... This is by paraphrasing his own words. His reasoning is that he was warned away by government / oil cartel agents. So if you listen to him at all, then you must always keep that in mind... He has made that clear multiple times.

However, if you follow his open-source work you will see a pattern and plan that many would term "worthy": That is to bring along the community and teach them certain principals and techniques necessary for finding and creating THEIR OWN devices & results. How many here started with building the SG? How much was learned from that experience? I would submit, that was the real point.

If you accept the idea that Free Energy exists, then imo, logically you must also accept that Suppression of it exists. If suppression of it exists, then you will probably come to the conclusion that this suppression must be universal: It must stop any open University Studies of these technologies, it must stop them from being Patented and allowed to market, and it must stop them from being widely heard about in the mainstream media. This is just common sense: As once ONE SINGLE F-E device reaches the mainstream, the questions and interest of the Public becomes too loud to ignore... And scientific theory must change to accept the empirical evidence. Once that happens, there is room for a hundred more devices to be accepted. So if Suppression exists, it must be all-encompassing to work at all.

So... It all comes down to whether we think suppression is plausible or not. Here is an example of Suppression that EVERYONE i have ever had this discussion, AGREES WITH:

That a government would deliberately stop a technology that was a danger to public health and safety from reaching market, and suppress information on it: Declaring it "Secret". As i say, EVERYONE agrees this is possible, and most would agree it is the "right & proper thing to do".

So it comes down to this: Do you trust your government to always use this power if suppression wisely? Are you convinced that some people within a government could not mis-use this power to have something that really was "safe" declared secret anyway... Because it would hurt some corporations' profits, or disrupt someone's plans?

That is the question you must answer for yourselves. Because if you do not trust this to always be the case, then you must admit the possibility that these Free Energy technologies DO INDEED EXIST, and have been suppressed. What we are trying to do here, is re-invent the wheel... Wheels that have been re-invented over and over the last hundred years. Every time someone is successful, the wheel is taken away, the knowledge of it suppressed, and we have to start over

Overunity or perpetual motion are two distinct things.

Perpetual motion in my opinion can NEVER exist because this means that you NEVER have an input, you never have a fuel, it works on its own, that IS breaking the law.

Overunity is another thing depending on how you look at it.

Overunity is taking a 9v battery and powering a circuit to produce 240v to power your house and as long as the battery is connected or has not run down, it will power your house. Another example is if you have a generator which is run on water only, impossible NO, you are using a fuel just like gas. When you run out of water the generator stops, the fuel was water, just like in a car the fuel was petrol.

Now overunity is real but you allways need a fuel, be it a battery or water or what ever you want to use, you have to put in an input to get an output.

Here on this forum has been shown OU, look at the Dr. Stiffler videos, I think it is his secound to last which shows OU. On his computerised plotting of an experiment he has clearly shown OU of the two plots of jouls consumed to the joules extracted. He shows the cross over point where after he is getting OU. He does not put it into words, but he is showing it to our eyes, that is the way he is, and that is one way that it CAN be done.

Mike

[quote=jibbguy;68284]
Well said Jibguy!!

There are many misunderstanding about Over unity many of the people who claims it, don't actually know what is happening on their devices and think that voltage reading is over unity.

The principal reason of this is that is there is a lot of confusion about what energy really is and where it come from or where it goes in internet.

The laws of thermodynamics is impossible to be broken because is very clear whenever you put energy in a closed system and you transform that in whatever energy, potential or kinetic. You will never extract all that energy back. Energy is not created and not consumed its transformed or at least accumulated or transfered.

Some people think there is a magical energy that come from somewhere and can be extracted. I don't believe is magical.

There is energy everywhere one can use it to perform work but you need to find a way to use it and principally know where it comes from. You at least need a bit of energy to be able to use it.

example:

One say i got a battery witch have a 12v and 100 amps. This totalize 1200W of stored energy, power right. But what happens when you short it??? The voltage witch is the energy in form of potential force accumulated in form of chemical energy, makes the electrons from the negative side pass thru the wire and if you have a resistance between it will heat up this is an energy transformation, from the electrochemical energy in the battery into electrical energy or movement of electrons than into heat.

What voltage really is?

Is easier to start understanding how electrical energy work by thinking voltage as a vacuum and wires as a tube and electrons like air, instead of the water pressure comparison that comes from the a tank passing thru the tubes and coming to the ground.

I know an inventor that is able to light up a 1kw lamp for 48 hours using only a battery 9 volts 4 amps he didn't explained me how because the subject was far ahead but the important is that he can.

If you think about if the thermodynamics laws clear indicates a closed circuit obviously is clear that in an open circuit you can have different conditions even over unite (or have more work done than conventional with the same energy) without breaking any laws of thermodynamics.

In my thread you can see i talk about my research on water as a fuel witch is believed to not be true by many, and i'm working since 3,5 years on it now and i think it don't break any laws while working because i don't consider it a close circuit.
my thread:
Stanley meyer the true

I didn't reached yet but i'm close to that. O U Its possible for sure its write on the laws of the conservation the clue (the way that wont work)!

Michael, did you just bring the Earth to a stand still? Just kiddin'.
There are many oscillating/ moving/rotating fields we are immersed or exposed to, many of which barely understood. There are existing theories, same as a theories -LAWS- created upon discoveries. Some of them were declared century ago. When Wright Brothers flew their aircraft in 1903, books were still claiming man made flying apparatus impossible due to the LAWS of physics. The more open we remain the more chances are that we achieve something, instead of perfecting denial, based on LAWS. Greatest discoveries and technical advancement in history of human mankind were accomplished by people not afraid to think freely, often against common sense, odds - predicted by colleagues and lack of support. I'm not a dreamer but I would not dare to discredit someone's life of work and experiments only because I don't fully understand them or my replication does not work as it suppose to. We shall look for possibilities and combine our efforts as long as internet remains available. 30 years ago I had to seat in the library and search through towers of books to find an answers. We have an opportunity which never existed before; worldwide lab with unlimited resources, brain power and every possible piece of equipment to test our ideas. Just think about

V

Yes... exactly.
I think there is a new paradigm starting up here that is a Renaissance.
The old hierarchical business model for invention is breaking down and
being replaced by a world-mind that is struggling to organize its thoughts
and resources.

"Humanity will be like an ant heap stirred up with a stick: See the excitement coming!" - Tesla

Guys well said. really.

The case is that you cannot claim Ou and fetch specific drawings that have not the potential at OU at all.

Claim OU in nanomechanics that could operate at stochastic resonance. OK possible.
Claim OU at very high energetic states of matter. OK perhaps.. But to claim OU with a coil and a magnet and a battery, which have been replicated in muriads different setups and NOt one dare to claim so. How the ff.. we can trust those "patents" and "setups" ?

IMO, start with a setup of yours based on your understanding. Chances are much higher to reach OU instead of following patents as Bedini's, Adams etc etc

That's i am gonna do anyways..

Regards,
Baroutologos

ps: the next inventor who claims OU with stupiod plain circuits, will have to bear the burden of guiding third parties at replicating the device. No replication = no possible

Hmm...there is a simple test.If million of users will try to connect to that WWW service at the same moment it surely fail to operate properly.
What if million TV sets are adjusted to the same TV signal ?

I somewhat agree with you. But it may take these archaic coils and circuits to get to the point of understanding to move on. The whole thing revolves around manipulating the magnetic fields/spectrum and frequencys to do your bidding in my opinion. When someone can take a 4 inch crystal tube filled with water and oscillate the crystal and watch the water disappear as it blows a 4 inch hole through his roof,that's telling me something.
As a Vietnam veteran I can safely say never give up. When you do the battle is over for you.

I can understand your discouragement in trying to replicate the Bedini setup.


I have felt it too.


Over two years of charging/ discharging batteries I have not seen OU.

But what I have seen is my knowledge of electronics has grown by leaps and bounds and I have built a battery swapper with a pic controller, and I have picked up many skills that have been most useful to me.

I have meet with others who have struggled with the same experiences and have been able to make new friends, and.... to share with those who are just starting.

What I have gained is an effective method of desulfating batteries. I have learned some very efficient methods of charging batteries. And, I have learned of the chemistry of batteries.

Is Bedini a fake like Mylow when it comes to OU? I have no idea. But I will say he builds one heck of an amplifier that sells for high dollars. ( I used to work in a shop that sold them )

I for one am glad that OU is not easy. If it was easy then the governments would goto war with incredible energy weapons.... Yet these may be there only in hiding.

I will keep on playing with this as I am addicted, and I will also work in other areas as well. Solar power, and syngas, and windpower are all ways to get energy, slowly I hope to use them well, better than yesterday.

Mart

Bedini, Einstein, Newton, Tesla, the Wright brothers aside (many more of course), all have which contributed to solving this worlds make up -- Probably all which has said “never give up”, but in their teachings, theories or just down right abstracts, have taught me to continue my efforts to make this world a better place. I am honored to be part of a community that wants more than the “status quo” and experiments, Disputes (which is totally ok), creates and explains their view, to achieve success in the development of free energy (that’s right, free energy (maybe not OU or perpetual)). One day it will happen, just as the Wright Brothers took flight, we will obtain free energy, and rid ourselves of the reliance on fossil fuels.
Baroutologos, I will be happy to say that I have contributed in some way to make that happen, but if I ever say that “I am done” will be the first time that I have settled for “Second Best”.

Regards

Bit’s

I think your in part right when you say the following

I for one am glad that OU is not easy. If it was easy then the governments would goto war with incredible energy weapons.... Yet these may be there only in hiding.

However i think one of the main reasons that energy weapons are not used in war is because the main reason for war is over energy. As well energy is a control factor of the those in power. If the average joe blog has the ability to control his/her own destiny then in most cases he/she will choose to stay at home and enjoy the good life. Have you ever thought why china dosnt have free energy. The chinese people dont live in a little shell any more and are aware of a big wonderful world outside the regime. It would divide country strongly. Those who want to stay red and those who want liberty and know they can have it via free energy. I dont explain it to well but i think you get what i mean.

Who did that?

Cheers,

Steve

P.S. I couldn't care less if some of Bedini's OU claims are not being replicated. He seems like a pretty good bloke and he builds amazing amps! I am just thankful that I now have a kick-ass battery charger.

Perpetual motion is a fundamental property of matter. Matter never stops moving! Electrons revolve perpetually around their nucleus. If matter really behaved the way we're taught in school, every electron in the universe would have spun into its nucleus at the beginning of time.
Where does all that energy come from? We're swimming in a sea of energy. Just because we haven't figured out yet how to harness it for our own purposes doesn't negate its existence.
The possibilities and opportunities are endless. The most difficult hurdle is getting out of the mindset that free energy is some sort of a pipe dream. Nobody said it was easy (it isn't). Bedini gave us some tools and pointed us in the right direction, it's up to us to take it further. This entails a lot of hard work. Research is not easy or quick.
People want it all handed to them on a silver platter. Life doesn't work that way. Building a schoolgirl motor or two and then throwing up your arms and declaring free energy a bust is shortsighted. The schoolgirl motor is kindergarten. It's just the beginning, not the end.
This road is not for the feint of heart. Countless disappointments are the rule and not the exception. Nevertheless, each setback is a lesson. If you stay in school long enough you start to learn things. The more you learn, the more you see. New possibilities present themselves and the process continues.
My advice is to get your hands dirty, and keep them that way.

Cheers,

Ted

Excellent posts . I too, have been involved or obsessed with free energy for about 15 years. I have tried to replicate different systems from different inventors to obtain free energy. One thing I found out was that these patents, which you can freely download, are only a set of ideas, which may have not been built in the first place. The patent office no longer requires a working model to obtain a patent. And too, there are no dimensions to go by. These are not actual blueprints. Of all the many people who have been working on free energy over the years, only a handful have suceeded.Of those, only one I know of has actually posted his on the web. It is not all complete though. Energy is all around us, we only need to design a device that can convert it in useful energy.This is not in opposition to conservation of energy laws, it is using energy already existant and changing it. I have not succeded with free energy either, but have come close many times. I have not become discouraged either. Perseverance. My new design works on paper. Good Luck. Stealth

@Baraotologos
@theremart
@dambit


My case is identical, I have not seen OU in this circuits, my battery has 20 cycles charging discharging totally controlled, I've using a Good Equipment regulated power source to feed my solid state, the Solid State was perfectly tuned, with high tech components:


Two Coils
TL494 PWM precission
Mosfets IRFP450 one per coil.
4n25 Optos for Mosfet Control
Battery YB5L-B.

The circuit was tuned reaching a 65% recovery spike measured putting a resistor on the output.

I had two months charging & discharging the battery, the discharging process was with a 3 Watts bulb, I've noticed the when the bulb is connected the voltage drop to 12.51 volts but is scaling up after first 8 minutes to 12.56 (conditionning sings), but when the battery is discharged by the bulb per 1 hour then the circuit need > 10 hours to fully charge the battery to >14.2 volts (levels 100% connected).

The circuit has operated with 65 ma @ 12 volts, so I have tried to recharge the battery with only < 6 hours and was impossible, the battery only reach 13.5 volts and in this level battery is continually discharging between cycles for example if I repeat discharging process for the next recharging cycle in 6 hours hardly reach 13 volts....

I have no OU, was impossible, conditionning process sings is no visible with 20 cycles I've took 2 months (charging + resting & discharging + resting etc).

I can say that battery is perfect 100%, amperage, holding charge etc.

Baraoutologos, you're right this is continue in this way is stupid and anti-economical, wasting money in transistors, copper etc.

I would like to see the result's ren in his Window Motor and to know if was possible get OU adding circuit's Mike. I'm saving some money to try a Window Motor using the circuit's Mike and Why not?, the circuit I've designed about Adams generator coils some months ago.

overunity.com is publishing news about circuits OU but really works?.

Regards...

Patmac am i sound like a bit angry? I am researching man and have purpose of finding the truth.

Thanks for your confirmation but one thing is very clear to see. No OU is possible with the circuits and info given by Bedini et all. Its best to tell Ou secret is hidden and not revealed, than to support is easy to be attained with some transistors, wires and coils and DVDs of course.

I remember EFTV 10, saying after you saw that monumentary DVD you have no excuse not to make an OU machine... jeez a pile of bull. This forum has some of the excellent tinkerers i have ever met. yet not one OU. So? we have not excuse? We are dumbs?

Perhaps... if we are to continue spending and buying the OU promise by the OU merchants. Its a kind of fetich if you think better of deprived of logic. Unless its a hobby... That way i understand.

@ Stealth,
If there are some people claiming that have attained Ou why not share their results? Economic interests? Kind of convinient. I know equal amount of people claiming they are speaking with God.

Anyway, perhaps OU is there, but guidance surely is not. Only exploitation of our urge to obtain OU.
I have nothing more to add. Conslusions are yours gentlemen.


regards,
Baroutologos

@baroutologos

Yes. I ever thougt Bedini uses some like negative resistor for example, look if we extract negative energy from SG and pass throught a truly negative resistor then output current is amplified and is possible get OU. But what type negative resitor is using?. Maybe rocks who knows...

Many people try to find "over unity" without first identifying the energy form they are trying to tap. It's like trying to build a windmill without ever experiencing the wind.
You have to be able to identify and "measure" the energy source before being able to harness it. Zero point energy sounds great, but how the hell do you quantify it, let alone use it? Tom Bearden talks a great talk, but I have yet to hear him offer one way to tap into all the energy he yammers endlessly about.
Negative energy, zero point, Dirac Sea, scalar waves, Phasers and light sabers are all in the same fantasy world until they can be harnessed and used. I think this is where a lot of the confusion and frustration is generated.
Stick to what you can work and feel comfortable with. Find the energy source first, then figure out a way to harness it.

Ted

Whats the definition of "overunity"?. Is the word thrown around to loosely.

I never heard Bedini himself say the monopole was an overunity device. I was always under the impression it put the battery into a state of self charging. It also reformatted the lead crystal structure that allowed for more storage in a given battery.

Would you believe the results? Even if you couldn't duplicate it.....And if God spoke to you would you listen?

Hmmm

Matt

I need to clarify what I call free energy. This is energy that is already here, like sunlight on a solar cell, or wind on a wind turbine, or hydroelectric from a water source. OU is what I call man made energy, like from a battery powering a device which produces more energy than was consumed. I was not talking OU. I was talking about identifying and using energy already in motion, but changing it to another form in which we can use to do work. Energy is all around us, we just need to identify it and build a device to transform this energy to a usable motor. Good Luck. Stealth

@Stealth
I think your on the right track, many people who do not understand always get into this argument of semantics. ie...OU is impossible as is perpetual motion because of this or that scientific principal, it is a nonsensical argument because they always take the terms out of context to suit their perspective. Physics and nature dictate all matter is in motion, all motion is energy, matter is energy, energy propagates through all supposedly empty space as radiations (light, microwave, UV, infrared ect...)therefore all space whether it is occupied by matter or not contains energy. I think the biggest issue is the fact that everyone complicates things until they make little or no sense what so ever. If you want to see perpetual motion all you have to do is look out the window, everything you see will always be in motion relative to something else -- perpetual motion is nature
Regards
AC

People, pls. We all need to have same reference ground.

Whatever negative energy is, it must be converted to standard electricity in order to obtain the usual usefull effects. if negative energy was to have same effects as normal electricity, then fine by me.

If work could be produced, heat, light etc then no problem at all. The case is it is not there and it does not. Someone claims, we could not utilize it since we cannot grasp it essence.

Pls... we are told the standard devices make and capture it. Batteries. No? OU is in batteries we are told. No? Anyway, this debate is somewhat futile. The point is, with this kind of orientation and humble means my best bet is that no one of us could ever experience Ou no matter how many years pass and how much persistance we have.

Its almost mathematically true that anyone of serious search of OU could spend muriads of hours and money and yet nadda. That was the "easy" promise of some coils and magnets and a set of battery. (and having bought a couple of books and DVDs of course)

Later you discover its not that easy huh? We must "understand" first huh? has anyone understood anything so far? If yes pls present your results and some device for replication that goes OU. Its a long way yet to go... Okkk...

One thing is for sure. A clever practical man should make distinction between things that work and bull.

Regards,
Baroutologos

I would just like to repeat something I said earlier about my experience since baroutologos is only speaking from his experience...

@patmac
I'm pretty confident that solid state can not go "overunity". The mechanical work is important.

Yes, baroutologos, you have a point.

I totally agree with you in terms of blind OU chasing. You have to be very bright and talented (and I mean - very very, one in a billion) person to empirically build a device, using presently available tech, that works based on physics principles yet to be discovered and utilizes energy from source yet to be found as valid energy source. For normal, everyday citizen it is practically impossible.

In contradiction we should search for natural phenomena, which can't be explained by traditional science. That is what I am trying to do, reading about K.Meyl and building an experimental setup. That is what other guy in this same forum is trying to do, developing a device in order to try to detect scalar EM waves.

It is a fact, that energy is around us, at zero point. Vacuum energy. I believe it can be used. Many believe otherwise. But there are two possibilities. One, that in macroscopic scale all these fluctuations really averages out and we can't pick it up using macroscopic phenomena (like electromagnetism), that our only chance is nanotech. Second, maybe there are some kind of interaction that allows to use that energy with macroscopic phenomena, but then again - we don't know how that could work. In both cases it is extremely hard to just "tap into this energy".

Best luck to all.