"what would happen if the bulb was surrounded by mirrors and concentrated into a single beam aimed at something? Perhaps the mirror surfaces being arranged in a forward-angled spiral."

You ever looked into the lens of a military search light? All that extreme beam of light is just from a small gas flame. thousands of small mirrors.

@Aromaz: No, I'm not familiar with them. But I figured I wasn't the first one to connect light with mirrors. So you're saying they used mirrors to cast a stronger beam. All I'm suggesting is to take that a bit further into the concave as a possible focused power source... taking ALL the light coming off a light source and throwing it into one small area, or point.

Sort of like what happens with a solar cooker, except better because the sun is a moving source. If you did the solar cooker with static bulbs correctly placed you might have a lot of energy, maybe even almost all the energy from bulbs, focused.

There would still be waste heat, but if you came up with something for the heat to do -and contribute- it would only get better. I was down to the Northwest True Value a few days ago and they had a new heater running in the basement with a sign beside it telling it only uses the energy of a lightbulb. I believe two of those babies would almost heat an entire home.

I think it could be bettered, and instead go further to being the home's power source, if someone was to do it. Probably not Over Unity but 99% or 100% is very acceptable. However, if once it got warmed up & running was to feed a piece of its own Output back to power the bulbs you would definitely have OU.

I betcha Sir James Dyson could do it <> Bagless vacuum inventor Sir James Dyson introduces bladeless fan <> what he has done with Wind could be done with Light, except that the light would be going in, combining via the mirrors, then coming back, reflected out on the same side. Check out his circular Wing~Venturi wind system these 2 pictures:




I would try arranging the bulbs around in a circle toward the outside diameter, the reflected light being focused back into the center, where it would be focusing into a globe filled with an energy-collecting gel of some kind... or maybe just focused into a different type of wire, or a metal ball acting as a capacitor (for holding a building charge of light NOT an electrical capacitor).
....

Has anyone thought about the analagy of this imense sea of energy we are in?

Has anyone watched something get dropped in a perfectly smooth pool of water. The results are amazing to watch in time laspe photography.

Has anyone ever thought of this pool of energy surrounding a coil?

What happenes when you pulse that coil just once for this example?

Has anyone just put the two together? Why is it that the resulting pulse comes back so much more voltage then what was put into it and even shorter pulse width?

One theory is that the surrounding pressure of energy we are afloat in can do a lot more then what we can do in a shorter time with our current electronics. Much like blowing up a baloon. Blowing it up takes time but releasing it takes very little time. If there was infinit energy then you would think that the energy bounce would be infinit but it isn't. There is a limitation of the tension to balance. It can only respond so much or have a certain amount of tension to the surrounding field that it took to displace it. It is not a collasping field but a field that is being crushed back twords a balance of tension. In all the experiments ranging from Bedini to anyone on here, I don't think anyone has thought of this analogy.

Better to understand the back pulse and you get the laws that govern this subcomponent of electricity. Lets say the background element of electricity. Undertsanding things like the time it takes to bounce back, no matter what voltage it is, should be key to understanding the background movement speed and weather frequency alters that movement or voltage potential. When a smooth pond is broken by an object falling into it, if it has obsticles like shorelines or walls, there will be a corrisponding wave returning causing an additional wave or energy pattern at the impact site. Cutting a 2d image of the impact site would be like looking at an oscilascope view of a wave form, only at 1/4 of the whole picture Time to the nth degree. If someone could calculate the variables of the transformer to input vs the negative pulse in relation to voltage and time compression I think you'll be starting to understand the laws that govern the returning compression creating the huge votage spike. You might even start to devise ways to use it in such a way to be able to amplify or get the most out of that compression spike.

This is just one way to approach OU. Sir Dyson sure has it right. Devise a way to do more with less using little known or payed attention to conventional physics to get more then you pay for. As with air, electricity has something that gets dragged along with it. If that thing is the real energy and what we are seeing is just the manifestation of that energy then devising a device to do what Sir Dyson did with air would be the key to unlocking the secret.

I do not subscribe to the OU dogma. What I do subscribe to is energy is neither created or destroyed. It just transforms from one state to the other. How well the transformation process of your device determines it's true efficiency. Whats not transformed to the work you want is only dissapated to the background tension. Now certain transformations can always include moving the background tension and give it inertia thru resistances or like media attraction. Move air and it won't move forever because there are resistances. Move air in the right way and it will move more then what you have to pay for using a common realm of physics, pressure. But only in the immediate area of your device. After that distance of resistances take over and it stops eventually.

Are we gonna find a way to OU. Probably not. Are we gonna find ways to manipulate the natural flow of this energy to convert it into usable energy. I'd say we are touching on it. But at what cost?

@Jbignes5: The cost? hehehe that's sanity. You have to lose some to make what's left new. Waves going into a rocky shore the energy gets broken and directed every which way, but in a swimming pool with hard sides you have more reflection. That's about what I know about waves. <> An electrical equivalent to what Dyson's circular wing is doing ~speeding up the air flow~ is sort of what happens when a small current is passed through a tiny wire.

Let's say that wire was inside a ball, and the ball was filled with some element or liquid that would have a v/fast reaction time to Heat. Okay, so if you pulsed the wire you would create a big expansion~contraction cycle. To get electricity from the physics at work you would need a generator like a coil that would push a magnet in & out on contraction and on expansion, so you'd be making current first off the electrical-caused expansion that first caused the expansion, right? But, the electricity generated off the natural rebound contraction would be EXTRA. You have made a twofer of the price of one electrical pulse, which I believe would give you an over unity situation. hahaha

That's your pond wave man. You need a somewhat unstable liquid or gas (highly reactive) that would not be molecularly altered by the action... so that it would recover to the same smaller state it was to begin with. Like trying to push a car out of a ditch, it goes so far then comes back at ya. You could harness that too, because that's gravity doing the work on the weight of the car. You only pushed it.

@Jbignes5;

I could not made this statement better. You are on the spot!

@CloudSeeder;

You do have an interesting point. If one could take a small light source i.e. 1 inch gas flame in search light and make it into a masive 35,000 ft beam, then whay can we not do it with electricity?

ahh, we need to find the 'mirror' for electricity, something that will bounce the electrons and multiply their force by exciting more from the sea of energy.

So what material did Stubblefield use in in heating dishes that bounced the energy to and from? What was their shape? What happened to them? Were they real?
These questions nagged me for a few months already.

@Aromaz: Plates to me mean capacitors. You're thinking reflection. Without a doubt he figured out a way -possibly- the plates may have done both. That's the real trick, to get stuff to do more than one operation at the same time.

Like Dyson combining a wing with a circle shape plus a venturi effect to speed the air up. A threesome banger actually, a synergy. Hmm, perhaps if the circle was magnetized and speeded up electrons in a wire going through the center. You might would need a switch turning one off at the same time the other turns on, like a very fast knife switch.

I only know enough electronics to be dangerous. hahaha I hear the Gov made a very powerful railgun not long ago that fires a million projectiles a minute. What they use for weapons many times has a peaceful expression if we look for it. Perhaps, instead of using a wire carrier for the juice, perhaps a stream of water or other fluid whichever might give some electrons to the Cause.

@All: We could be close to finding what Tesla found, electricity from the air, borrowing electrons from the air, or one of the elements in the air for that matter. I am only minimal help but I know enough to recognize cards being shuffled.

I think it might be helpful to remember that these guys lived in a different time. They still referred to air as the ether, as if it had mystical powers to give up... so they went in search to find them and get em. They believed, they had faith, and that's where the young guys fall on their face sometimes. Their training [brainwashing] is almost complete.

Like my enginewow and Millenial Dawn engines. They'll stand there looking you square in the face and acknowledge there are laws they still don't understand, right?, but when I tell them my engines don't violate thermodynamic laws but instead are a layer above them, the old brainwashing kicks in and that's the end of that. Male Ego kicks in and any further discussion is futile.

I think people are coming to realize we could use some new plays. I get a lot less resistance nowadays than I did 3-5 years ago. Wouldn't it be funny if the answer involved using Dyson's own device, adapted with coils and switches? As far as I'm concerned it looks a bit like he stole the idea from the TV show The Time Tunnel.

Not that my ideas for spiraled mirrors escapes the same criticism. That would indeed be hilarious if we ended up making devices from an early TV Sci-Fantasy show. Maybe we could bring back Lee Meriwether. She was hot.

One point that I keep running into is the point that the sea of energy is plasma based. In all of the experiments and observation it seems that this aether is gaseous or has fluid dynamics involved. Plasma sure fits the bill. take a tube fill it with plasma and pulse the plasma in a direction. In theory it should do what Sir Dyson did. Draft more plasma along with it. Use the total plasma to generate or manifest electricity and walla you have a movement of the basic structure of say the medium and then have it manifest on wires or plates and draw from that what you need. That way you are not trying to use the basic structure or consume it but just move it causing the manifestation of electrity and using that. Then it should rebalance after and no harm done. This way we are not destructively sucking from the very nature of everything and only making waves to cause a manifestation of electricity. Maybe I got that wrong but there should be a way to make a pump converter without it being a brute force device.

@Jbignes5: In my car engine I bring supercold air (a liquid by being compressed at 4,361 psi) together with steamed H2O already injected into the cylinder. This is the makings of a very powerful tornado, and you could call it a plasma of sorts. As the injected liquid air even touches the steam, the steam is collapsing back into a much lesser volume of condensed water.

Collapsing away creates a vacuum in front of the expanding air. This magnifies the rate/speed of air expansion enormously... to where when it hits the piston head it slams it, not simply expands into it, with the Speed of a Thiunderclap in a vacuum w/out air to slow it down.

By combining these two simple forces together -both of them apart being inert- I've made an engine that goes to exponential, where 2 + 2 = more than 4. It does many of the things you say is possible of your plasma => it turns a big alternator to pump out gobs of electric current. That's the pump you say you want via the action you say is possible.

And as Aromaz and others here have mentioned its action should have its equal with other energies. I believe if we were to build my engine we would gain even more insights into energy that would help everybody make those expanded extrapolations. Making the "physical expression" would tutor us to make it work in other disciplines.

Come on there is more to be gleened from this. You have great ideas for energy generation. This is exactly what I was talking about. Coaxing energy from what one would not expect or connect to. Air and water I believe have the highest concentrations of this plasma energy. Water being the perfect conductor or transducer. Has anyone looked at at the expansion of ice forming in water and how much of a distance it will travel or even the power that a liquid has in that transformation. There are non-electrical ways to produce phenomina that could be harnessed. Much like your description Rodin touches on the power that might be present in a tornado. 5-10 times that of a atom bomb.
Maybe electronics is the wrong way to go here. Yes the generation could be electronic but the mechanism should be of something non electrical. As in the case of Sir Dyson he gets more out then he puts in. Putting light power generator that have near zero cogging would only bee a boon after using his priciples and design of his bladeless fan. Imagine a bank of these fans thru a wind tunnel like aparatus driving generators. Would it put out more then in?

You could also argue that Wind & Solar & Gravity energies are all forms of plasma from which we can benefit without having to produce. I've designed an engine for each one that goes beyond current technologies.

My "Wind Engine" of 2003 or so was a back & forth reciprocating machine with big "hands" (fans) that would turn their side to the wind, be pushed back and then turn sideways to return back forward. The power to pull it back to the front came from a cross member piece connecting the two sides fans. One side was always pushing the generator mounted at the base benefiting from the leverage (the arms the fans were up on). Leverage increased the power of even a slight wind speed below what is usually required of a standard windmill.

My solar engine does a few neat tricks of power magnification also, and far above what any "solar panels" can achieve, but at the moment I'm working on my Gravity Wheel and it looks fantastic. A lot of people worked real hard to prevent me from regaining my footing and building my various engines. A "conspiracy"? I don't believe that they sat down together and plotted against me but the effect has been similar <> a combination of individual efforts has gotten in my way.

When I found this Energetic Forum site I felt by joining I would escape that. And I am poised now to complete my gravity wheel. In fact, I've already built 4. Two are rather impossible to construct with my low level of building models experience; one came very close to spinning nonstop, and the one I'm about to complete today fixes the problems that one had. The arms kick a high leverage factor to the axle, and a generator gear meshed to an axle gear can power a home, not the whole world like nuclear, but the whole world one home at a time, one nighttime-charged battery bank at a time.

Like you would expect a plasma system to do. My earlier attempt at gravity is shown in this drawing below on the right, while my solar system device is explained how to make in the left side of the picture. I've added a few tricks to it since writing it up =>



I certainly do not mean to discourage anyone from pursuing their own chosen dream systems using electronic waves and big plasmas but I do think that building my simple systems first might give some insights into those more complicated systems.

@Jbignes5: Yes, Sir Dyson has done a great thing, but he hasn't done anything a plumber didn't know when they started using pipe. His system is just using the venturi magnification. He has made a "new use" of existing information, not some awesome bow on your knees knaves new technology. hahaha <> What he has done (and what I have done also) is recognize the self-feeding that comes from using circular engines or circular engine combinations of systems. In short, cyclical is also cannibal.
....

Floyd Sweets quote:

"The summation of the losses due to resistance, impedance, friction, magnetic hysteresis
and eddy currents and windage losses of rotating machinery will always reduce overall efficiency
below unity for a closed system. "

A good find nvisser! Myself, I started spontaneously just having ideas. I have never used the term "over unity" towards any inventions as each had occasion to occur to me, nor have I ever called them "free energy" or "perpetual motion". The only thing I have claimed is a belief in perpetual power that in a few natural circumstances can cause therefore a resulting perpetual motion but it only lasts as long as the switch is turned on, which negates the definition of perp. I wrote this about 5 years ago, my 1-2-3 understanding =>



I have only recently given in to using the over unity phrase because others here use it, but I don't like it. I do so for breaching the divide. If I was to start using it a lot people might say ah ha, he's another miracle chaser, which I am not and never have been. However, in the few instances I have come face to face with miracles I do not hold back from saying they are.

Your quote from Floyd Sweets is taken out of context. I do not allow such cup-always-empty statements to hammer me. His quote presents all the negatives quite well, so the job at hand is to either find ways to negate them but the best choice is to find ways to obtain something from them that contributes back into the equation.

As a for instance my enginewow.htm system. When the steam is almost instantly condensed by cold air you have some very cold water runoff. To circulate that back up to be re-steamed again would take right much electricity. However, the other side of the system, the air, is being re-compressed and compressors get very hot. But if the cold water coming from the engine cylinders is routed through water jackets surrounding the compressors you have cooled your compressors PLUS pre-warmed the water for being re-steamed, resulting in two positives from what appears at first to be a negative drain on the system.

It's all in the equation. Write the equation properly and you have achieved double positive sometimes, which people would call over unity, but like I said, I've never "tried" to create over unity and I hate the term and hate even writing it. But the thing is nvisser, that if you can find a few of these big plusses in a system, like enginewow, the total system can overpower those few remaining negatives of Floyd Sweets.

You design a system that uses resistance, uses impedance, either uses cancels out or otherwise avoids friction, uses magnetic hysteresis where a brake is needed perhaps, and as you do so you develop the impossible, whether it's "over unity" or not.

Perpetual power looks a lot like perp <> it isn't. Enginewow looks like perp but it uses gravity in the inertial forces generated by a moving vehicle to leverage-compress (re-compress) the air <> using gravity power effects is using an "outside force" which means it is not perp. Many of my own systems achieve power gains from leverage. Enginewow and Millenial Dawn both do it.

Millenial Dawn even negates the negative accumulation known as entropy. Every cycle it comes to a complete halt, and by the laws of Physics when kinetic stops the system gains another reload of potential energy. hehehehe whereas on the other engines that never come to a stop suffer mightily from entropy, and accumulation of heat from friction.

The Pantone GEET engine does my tricks by using the heat. Engine processes are like a cattle stampede. You have to set up barriers to direct the energies even the negative ones so that they all synergize together and feed into the overall system. All systems have negatives but if some of them on the outer subsets periphery are losing, who cares? As long as they do something positive toward the main set (system). It's all about overlapping sets and subsets, except instead of numbers we're dealing with energies.

It only works in circular systems because circular always comes back to where it started... which in reality means there is no start. Every point on the wheel is a starting point. Like a solar system's planetary orbits for example, the Moons around them, even perhaps in atomic scale also.

To make "perpetual power" I found it helpful to know about what is called a repeating loop, which occurs in an incorrectly written subroutine. My circular engines are all flawed repeating loops.

Yet still not Perp because they can be stopped and re-started. hahaha Anyway, the objective then is the same with magnetics or electricity. You need to stop thinking control the damn thing and aim for flawing it so it keeps going through the motions. I've done this a number of times so I know it can be duplicated across the other platforms, unless you keep repeating Floyd Sweets in your sleep. Then you're screwed.

Cloudseeder
My apologies.
That was not directed at you. I was thinking more of the Bedini free energy generator and other electrical close loops that we try to build.

No apology necessary nvisser. I don't know anything about Floyd Sweets so you broadened my knowledge. I appreciate you doing that. He specified his comments as regarding "rotating machinery" and also "a closed system". Since I don't know when the man lived he could've been talking about Eli Whitney, and I have no idea how he defines a closed system. My "systems" are more a combination of mini systems so his comments were not necessarily taking me into consideration, as in all-encompassing including my systems.

Maybe he's at odds with me & maybe he isn't. I just wanted to add some pancakes on the pile. Now I'm sitting back and waiting to see who brings the syrup. Or even another pancake. (Actually I'm not sitting today. I'm working on my gravity wheel to release it asap, and making very good progress.)

You should go read about Floyd sweets VTA. Very interesting
Floyd Sweet
The most amazing aspect of Sweet's device was that it put out so much more power than it took in. How much more? In a 1988 model, Sweet found that 330 microwatts 330 one-millionths of a watt of input power made it possible for the VTA's wire coils to put out more than 500 watts of usable energy, or about one and a half million times the input power.

Thank you very much! It does look very interesting, just as you said. After only a few paragraphs it says he saw something good in transformer malfunction that everyone else saw as a flaw. In a sense, my inventing and writing picks up on where the lives of some these many scientists ended. When I found Dr. Abraham Hertzberg's 1997 nitrogen-powered prototype (in 2003) I didn't find out til later he died just a few months before I saw how to make his engine work better.

I must be the cleanup boy, or water boy. I don't have any of those fellows schooling or credentials but, I came to the table with other gifts. I am lacking what they had and it gives me a "cross platform" capability. I combine anything that works, synergizes. And of course I have a vastly-improved Internet to work with.

I'm a slow reader so I'll have to tackle on that later. Thank you for your kindness! I am not schooled or qualified to be top dog on anybody's blog. I just toss my frisbees into the air and maybe somebody grabs one that helps them go further. I think everybody on the Forum knows much more than I do. When I was about 13 I came across a multi-subject college book my Dad's and that summer I read about Physics, Calculus, Anatomy, but I don't recall finding electricity. I went to ECPI a short while in 1987 so that's where I picked up what I had missed.

I am quite literally not qualified to be here. I anger some people.
I don't know the lingo so I sometimes have to invent new terms.

@nvisser: I had several concussions early in life, one a fly from a moving car as it rounded a curve & I landed on the back of my head, so I had PTSD flashbacks and a steady hum in my head til I was 22. I would start projects I never completed because the impacts had made my bipolar gene "go active". No one considers me a player. The actual odds of me completing a gravity wheel are very slim, as slim or slimmer as Moses parting the Red Sea.... or there having been an actual earth wide deluge "Flood".

Throw in that my thyroid never worked right heh heh heh and you know why I couldn't go to college <> didn't have enough energy. Mostly I've had to deal with extremely low body temperature and bouts of hypothermia. Even now it gets some worse so I have to keep the apt temperature above 77 or I start to aching everywhere as my blood circulation begins slogging down.

I'm not expected to accomplish anything further in life because so far I haven't accomplished anything anyway. All I have is a few ideas and no money because I never made any above food money. If my writing a lot looks like I have an overactive ego well, that's unfortunate because I don't much have one of those either. I can't point back to all my schooling or degrees, can't point back to all my accomplishments or great achievements.

Point of fact, I'm probably close to being the biggest nothing on earth. If someone was to actually shoot at me the bullet would start crying for being wasted, get angry and turn around at whoever the dummy was who pulled the trigger.

But I think those people who have opposed all these ideas of free energy are accepting that sooner or later people would figure stuff out, and I kinda think when they see someone as uneducated as I am even figuring it out they surely know resistance is futile. So I think we all have an open road now and should not expect any more threats for our work.

However, I also think they work real hard to keep us from ever having the money to build any of them.... so they really don't need bullets anyway. They just stick together as a tight group controlling the money and we all continue to fail. They know each of us has our own pet projects so the likelihood of anything coming from any of us is infinitesimally minute.

We totally lack cohesion required. The movies add ridicule. Yep, we're finished and plastered to the wall, from the most highly educated of us down to me. All we lack for is a proper eulogy. The longer we flail away at our quicksand the funnier we look. Even our demise looks funny. We come off looking funnier than the motorcyclists riding through asphalt and having their heads shaved and wearing wigs.

I'm used to all that but for those others on here being highly educated and then to suffer the indignity of being lumped together with the likes of me, failure man, for them it must be the lowest pit they've ever found themselves in. Someone like me coming from the bottom of the pit and standing beside them, whew, that's gotta be rough.

Someone should investigate that... because if it's true then Japan's planned system out in Space could possibly power the entire planet => Japan to Spend $21,000,000,000 on a Power Plant in F%#king Space - Power plant in space - Gizmodo. Some months ago I proposed a method for exploding liquid metal onto the Moon to form an interconnected metal mesh antenna for receiving solar energy to be beamed to Earth. No one seems to hear me. I lack the fantastic graphics. I only throw frisbees => Real Time Right Now Energy no Big Batteries Needed PDF List for 2008 Warnings for End Times Watchers and No More Fuel Pumps Ever Poverty of Third World Poor Ending Circular Energy Sources Renew Themselves Repeating Engine Loop Design of CloudSeeder Riley +download e-mail message for the Hopi elders "engine that breathes and uses water like the trees" => http://www.newpath4.com/Engines_that...rees_eml. zip and sitemap: Footrace to Peace from God's Kingdom World Health Zero Emissions No Exhaust Non-Polluting Energy Sources Helping Those Less Fortunate and pdf => http://www.newpath4.com/theearthstoo... recipice.pdf <> all reading, no pictures and no women, so hmm, scant vistors! hahaha Imagine that. No scantily just scant. This concludes this week's shameless plug of my website.

@nvisser: Sunlight shines above a tree and a shadow hits the ground. If a universal magnetism exists then let's say it is like the sunlight, with the exception one is visible the other not. So magnetism's shadow would be there but we wouldn't see it, so we wouldn't need a physical tree-equivalent. Being invisible is the tree-equivalent. Being invisible to us is the blocking agent.

Mr. Sweet "saw" the invisible by knowing it was there. Seems to me he set up a step up transformer and fired up the lesser side... and the pressure of the everywhere magnetism pushed itself into the other side to make the equation work. In other words, he built part of a machine that left a place for the magnetic pressure to fill in & complete, which it felt obliged to do. This is not unlike the way trinomial equations are solved when missing three variables. He plugged in a variable or two and magnetism plugged in the remaining variable which just happened to be extremely large.

Kind of like how we would set a dish outside so it would be there to get filled when it rains <> except magnetism is always raining.

Have fun with that!

It reminds me of how when a switch is thrown to a device say a washing machine, and electricity in the circuit box "senses" a hole that needs it and fills it, rushing past the thrown [closed] switch to reach the washing machine motor. Sweet figured out that magnetism would do the same thing, just without wires. Computer virus companies do something akin to this when they set up a "honey pot" (a completely unprotected computer system) to draw every new virus and trap it. I would say that Floyd Sweet set up a honey pot to attract magnetism. heh heh heh heh Damn smart man if that's what he did => he set a trap for magnetism.
....

Why we are all struggling along here;
1) the fact of RADIANT electricity has already been proven in the previous century - beyond doubt.
2) Also in that same millennia the pure fact of OVERUNITY was proven beyond any doubt. More electricity out from wires than was originally supplied - and that not on small Bedini scale!

Imagine a power generating plant having an output of 64,000 Mega Watt of electricity on a specific day, all along the lines they have transformers that are able to handle 120,000 MW. Suddenly their power in the lines start rising - above and over the 120,000 MW and these transformers blew up.

How can we on Earth be affected by space radiation?

How about magnetic storms on earth?
New Discoveries Show Electricity Governs Our Lives

What the heck, we are seeking the right answer with the wrong tools at the wrong place.

All joking back to the box: Do this following for a nice video of RADIANT energy!

Go to: Search and Download SOHO Near Realtime Data

Search for: Near Real Time
Set your resolution to 1024 (512 is OK if you have slow connection)
In the left IMAGE TYPE: Select LASCO C3
At display click on Movie
Start and End dates - type in:
2003-10-25 and 2003-10-30

Leave last n images open.

Click on Search

- sit back and enjoy the solar flare of 2003 that cause quite a bit of havoc.

We're dealing with two different animals. #1 is earth-generated that primarily pushes electric down a wire (voltage) and #2 a natural space energy perhaps of a universe level that is doing more than mere voltage. It's probably working on both sides, both pushing and pulling itself through our devices. Our puny little systems are like nothing to such a power <> they represent no resistance at all <> therefore the tiny amperage.

Every machine we make generates noise of some kind. Noise is energy. If we accept that this universe is one big machine, which apparently Floyd Sweet did do, then his conclusion of an invisible noise energy just makes more sense. Mr. Sweet must have concluded that we are living inside one giant clock-like mechanism that is screaming out a noise we are unable to hear (thank goodness).

It's actually a very simple concept, one that Mr. Tesla was also tapping into. Well, if Sweet could do it, and Tesla could do it, working apart from each other, exactly why aren't we using it now? Tesla shook a skyscraper and an entire city block while Sweet almost had his home vaporized. Have we just gone completely blind or what?

Wha! I didn't here that. Tell me about it or send a link?

David P.

In both cases it was a matter of resonance. Tesla with his 'vibrator' Floyd with resonating magnets.