Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2019 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 12 SEATS AVAILABLE!

2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference
ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 12 SEATS AVAILABLE - LIMITED SEATING
Get your tickets now: http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #211  
Old 12-25-2014, 01:55 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 495
Pods are temporary Soft Electrons?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
I'm sorry I'm so lazy that I'll answer this before looking any further into this topic's pages...

My guess is that there are two forces at work here: a memory, and the actualization of that memory inside the PMH.

So, the toggling back and forth can't initially light the LED because the PMH already remembers which way the prior flow of energy was directed within its circular path. This would imply that there are two reversals occurring simultaneously within every AC transformer during each half cycle: a reversal of its memory of the direction of flow and the actualization of its reversal (which is what everyone looks for: an output).

The reason why I suggest this, is on account of Joseph Cater's series of books, such as: The Awesome Life Force, which describes hard electrons contained within soft electrons. If soft electrons are moved about with either: no expense of energy (no resistance), or else an expense of energy less than 'breaking' the soft electrons which encapsulate the hard electrons to release their greater amount of energy, then an overunity results. {If I quote him accurately from dim memory of my own. }

So, this could imply two flows going on within a PMH: one of soft electrons and another of hard. Thus, there are two actions to take in reversing the polarity of flow for every PMH or AC transformer demonstration. It's just that in the case of an AC transformer, both polarity reversals happen at the same time, while in the case of the PMH set of reversals -- as aptly demonstrated by your YouTube video -- each reversal has to occur separate from the other.
I'll take a guess that F.D. Tombe's use of the term 'Pods' may be equivalent to Joseph Cater's term of 'soft electrons' making both a temporary phenomenon.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #212  
Old 09-23-2015, 10:20 PM
ThrowSomething ThrowSomething is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Orleans, La.
Posts: 1
Using coils from drain pump...

I used the coils from another replication. Works quite well.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 04-11-2018, 12:19 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,946
Perpetual Motion Holder

The origin of the Perpetual Motion Holder was already shared earlier in this thread, but here is the more complete story: Perpetual Motion Holder Origins - A & P Electronic Media
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 04-12-2018, 02:10 PM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
#7 reloading pellets

Aaron,
I saw your video on the #7 reloading pellets used as coil cores. Very informative and good method.

How did it perform? Any heating or problems?

Since this thread is about magnetism I thought to ask you here.

wantomake
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 04-12-2018, 04:18 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,173
Edward Leedskalnin PMH « RWGresearch

“Oh Nuts!” Magnetic Lock

Necessary for 4th edition book on Magnetism!!

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 04-13-2018, 12:18 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,946
core material

Quote:
Originally Posted by wantomake View Post
Aaron,
I saw your video on the #7 reloading pellets used as coil cores. Very informative and good method.

How did it perform? Any heating or problems?

Since this thread is about magnetism I thought to ask you here.

wantomake
They can heat up at high frequency. For low frequency applications like the Bedini SG and other similar machines, it will work fine.

There is a core material I was introduced to relatively recently that may obsolete anything I've seen. I'll ask if this person doesn't mind me sharing it.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 04-14-2018, 10:14 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,049
48 Hex nuts locked from a single spark.

This effect is limitless and requires no special winding. Compare this to rwg42985's "Oh Nuts" magnetic lock video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeJ5wHBpaf4
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 04-14-2018 at 10:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 04-19-2018, 12:59 AM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,049
Ed Leedskalnin's Coral Castle flywheel.

I noticed Ed Leedskalnin's "Coral Castle Flywheel" was a large wheel of over sized U shaped stators; I remember reading that it went through the floor and attached to some kind of pulley assembly. I wonder if the wheel may have risen vertically by PMH attraction like a piston, lifting tons of weight a tiny distance, then decoupled to drop back and turn a geared ratchet on a shaft below rather then rotating? The magnetic strength imparted to the stator by the tiny pulse in the video must be millions of times over unity!

https://youtu.be/Y0hHpY6JtmI

I plan to run a test tomorrow to see if the PMH pulse will attract the over head twin from a distance. I'll upload another video. This may solve the riddle. Ed had a secret method for lifting stone blocks that weighed tons. Perhaps he jacked them up incrementally with this kind of simple magnetic engine?

Suppose we line 100 Hex nuts up and weld them to a steel frame; Then we position them in close adjacency to an overhead steel frame. Next we run a wire through the holes in the Hex nuts and give it a spark. Would the nuts rise let's say 1/4"? A reverse current spark would unlock and drop the welded nuts and steel frame. It would simply be a matter of gearing to generate power this way. Millions of times over unity!
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 04-19-2018 at 01:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 04-19-2018, 03:06 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,049
Ed Leedskalnin's PMH locking effect at a distance.

Here's a successful demonstration of the effect: It would require power to keep ferrite cores attached with electro-magnetic energy.

https://youtu.be/fNtcbwpU9O8

Here's a second one with barbecue skewers holding the upper stator in place. I inadvertently break the lock because the lower stator and coils are held down by pressure from the skewers at the sides toward the end of the video, but it's clear the stators are locked together with no current to the electro-magnetic coils in the mean time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOJKmvF-t2A
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 04-19-2018 at 10:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 04-20-2018, 05:19 AM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,488
How are coils connected together ? Can you draw schematic ? What if you disconnect the leads which are permanently closing connection when the cores are locked in attraction ?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #221  
Old 04-20-2018, 12:39 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,049
schematic

@bogoslaw,

Disconnecting the leads does nothing to effect the permanent locking effect, but if the two coils are not connected by a clip at the negative sides, nothing takes place. The stator schematic is below to the right of the coil picture:

I noticed other testers demonstrating this effect on youtube, so it's nothing new, except I'm doing it with off the shelf components that are easy to come by.

I noticed that my rectangular ceramic magnets press neatly into the coil cores, so I plan to try some VTA experiments next.
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 07-17-2018 at 06:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 04-28-2018, 10:54 AM
itzon itzon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Question Core material

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
They can heat up at high frequency. For low frequency applications like the Bedini SG and other similar machines, it will work fine.

There is a core material I was introduced to relatively recently that may obsolete anything I've seen. I'll ask if this person doesn't mind me sharing it.
Did you get the chance to ask this person about sharing this info about core material? I'm sure many would like to know.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 04-30-2018, 06:20 PM
mikrovolt mikrovolt is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 788
There was a discussion with a few ideas about steel shot. about post #177
COP 20.0 (2000%) Demonstration

The video interview with Paul Babcock who is a busy guy, was open to the idea of that experimenters
could work with reducing magnetic reach and magnetic energy recovery.
The Bedini motor had a very significant speed increase with new core!
Magnetic reach I think is how deep a magnet's field pushes into the stator core.
In this case the Bedini coil. I believe stacking magnets brings the flux in tighter.
This inverse distance means power So better engineering needed to work with closer tolerances.
I recommend Paul and David Babcock and Jim Murray have much valuable information.
This is some the excitement that we missed in Idaho that year. (The SERPS demo)

https://youtu.be/rP6fpN6avIc?t=427

Paul talks about blowing things up. I take that to mean that making use of the physics
improves the energy output (power). Jim goes on to say that getting more people familiar with this technology
reduces the chances of having only a few control it.
__________________
 

Last edited by mikrovolt; 04-30-2018 at 07:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 08-27-2018, 02:41 AM
altrez's Avatar
altrez altrez is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 554
Question Starting

Hello All,

I am just starting out on this and I am not really sure what the PMH is used for, However I am going to build one. I found a pre builit kit on amazon that I think will work.

Can someone explain to me why it would not?

Here's the link!

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/...?ie=UTF8&psc=1



-Altrez
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 08-28-2018, 11:59 AM
bistander bistander is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,514
Material

Quote:
Originally Posted by altrez View Post
Hello All,

I am just starting out on this and I am not really sure what the PMH is used for, However I am going to build one. I found a pre builit kit on amazon that I think will work.

Can someone explain to me why it would not?

Here's the link!

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/...?ie=UTF8&psc=1



-Altrez
Hi Altrez,

That device has no material specifications for the steel or iron core. Your intended use depends on the magnetic retentivity of the core and that depends on the metallurgy. That device will certainly have some residual and show the desired effect to some degree. It might be a good way for you to get started experimenting. Try different current. Then some different core steel types.

Good luck,

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 08-28-2018, 12:17 PM
wayne.ct wayne.ct is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 546
Good probability

I would guess you will have some success with that, but like bistander said, you won't know till you try it. If it is constructed in such a way that you can take it apart and do some experiments you will learn a lot by trying some changes. The principle behind this is the characteristics of the material in the magnetic circuit. Different metals and the perfection of the junction where the keeper contacts the electromagnet are the independent variables. The wire and number of turns in the coils affect the size of the magnetic charge you can put into the magnetic circuit as does the voltage you apply to the coils. Even without making changes to the hardware you can compare what happens when you give in 12 volts instead of 6.
__________________
There is a reason why science has been successful and technology is widespread. Don't be afraid to do the math and apply the laws of physics.
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 08-28-2018, 09:23 PM
altrez's Avatar
altrez altrez is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Hi Altrez,

That device has no material specifications for the steel or iron core. Your intended use depends on the magnetic retentivity of the core and that depends on the metallurgy. That device will certainly have some residual and show the desired effect to some degree. It might be a good way for you to get started experimenting. Try different current. Then some different core steel types.

Good luck,

bi
Hello bistander,

Yeah I did not find any info on the metal but I will try it out in the next few days and see how it works.

-Altrez
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 08-28-2018, 09:25 PM
altrez's Avatar
altrez altrez is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne.ct View Post
I would guess you will have some success with that, but like bistander said, you won't know till you try it. If it is constructed in such a way that you can take it apart and do some experiments you will learn a lot by trying some changes. The principle behind this is the characteristics of the material in the magnetic circuit. Different metals and the perfection of the junction where the keeper contacts the electromagnet are the independent variables. The wire and number of turns in the coils affect the size of the magnetic charge you can put into the magnetic circuit as does the voltage you apply to the coils. Even without making changes to the hardware you can compare what happens when you give in 12 volts instead of 6.
Hello wayne.ct,

I like the idea of trying different voltages. I am not sure if it can be taken apart but i will find out soon.

-Altrez
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 10-06-2018, 01:54 PM
Dave45 Dave45 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,504
Two primarys
Two secondarys in series
Femf
__________________
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 10-16-2018, 02:38 PM
Dave45 Dave45 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,504
How do you create a sink, a low pressure zone
Study of creation- physics
Watch the weather channel

Why did the tpu stop producing when turned over

Food for thought
You dont vibrate it you spin it
__________________
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Reply With Quote
  #231  
Old 11-04-2018, 09:57 PM
Dave45 Dave45 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,504
[YT]https://youtu.be/tck2eNuhLlM/YT]
At 6:58 the compass rotates
A compass does not rotate using ac
__________________
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 03-15-2019, 03:04 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 495
Exclamation Seems to me Tesla figured out how to get useful energy out of a PMH

http://www.energeticforum.com/316604-post126.html

Although, it took me a year to figure out what the simulation, in the post - above, was implying ...

That two PMHs are involved ...
  1. One has an extremely large mass to its core plus moderately large coils, while ...
  2. The other one has smaller coils and no extension of its core outside of its coils like the first one has.

This is the foundation of William Lyne's story of Tesla's contribution to some of the German Elektro-U-Boats in WWII, that: "for every two hundred pounds of iron added to his Special Generator, one horsepower was added to its output".

This is essentially a PMH enhancement to whatever electric generator, or motor, can utilize the benefit of this enhancement.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 04-26-2019, 06:39 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 495
Gravity and How to Extract Energy from out of a PMH

Quote:
Question
Edward Leedskalnin (Coral Castle) describes a perpetual motion holder in his writings. I've built one and pretty much know how it works (I think). It is NOT a perpetual motion device by any means, but more like a magnetic version of a capacitor. That, I think, is the best way to describe it. (I never saw this effect demonstrated in grade school or college, which sort of surprises me.) It can be seen demonstrated here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhiAIsJCS9Y

and here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJSDYYaF3LA -- dead link

(NOT an unknown phenomena....)

The closest conventional use I could find of an internal, stable magnetic field is the field creation in magnetic core memory toroids.

My question is: How stable is this field? Would it really last forever, or at least many, many years?

It seems that it would have less leakage than a capacitor (holding an electric field), so I'm guessing it's holding capacity would be many years. I'm also assuming that nothing is "moving" but a stable configuration of magnetic domains is created by the brief electric field (which can then be removed) which maintains the (internal) magnetic field due to their alignment. Is this correct?

(NOTE: electric energy can be retrieved from the field by wrapping a coil of wire around the material and breaking the connection. The collapse of the magnetic field induces an electric current which can light a lamp or LED with a brief pulse of current.)
Answer
Since the radius of an eddy current, not the mass holding the magnetic eddy, determines its intensity, time is of no consequence.

Despite the use of energy to induce a magnetic eddy (and electromagnetic energy is time-dependent), and despite the reverse polarity of an eddy, the eddy itself is not energetic since the duration of electromagnetic inducement is not a factor which alters the storage capacity of a magnetic eddy within Perpetual Motion Holder material. Thus, a magnetic eddy is a force devoid of the component of time rather than an expression of energy (which must include time to have any meaning).

Thus, to answer your question using mere logical deduction (devoid of experimentation) predicated on what is already known about magnetic eddy currents, the charge in a PMH will last forever.

The magnetic permeability of the material, and its mass, will merely determine how much force gets transferred to the material from the exterior magnetic field used to induce the magnetic eddy and, thus, also determine how much loss occurs in a transformer core (for instance) whenever electrical energy is attempting to transfer from the primary coil of a transformer to its secondary.

Magnetic permeability will also determine how much loss occurs when the PMH is broken to release its stored potential.

Maybe, it would be more common sensical to replace my use of the term: “force” with the more pragmatic term of: “potential energy”?

Thus, it will be possible to hypothesize that a PMH is converting kinetic into potential energy during its charging and is conversely converting potential into kinetic energy during its release?

As an aside... A PMH is the simplest confirmation of -- what we've mistaken to be a separate force known as -- gravity generated by the magnetic lock of a hollow planet.

The radius of a planet (and its magnetic permeability), not its mass, is directly proportional to its gravitational field since the intensity of an eddy current is likewise directly proportional to the radius of a magnetic eddy. This magnetic lock (popularly referred to as gravity) may be jeopardized if the thickness of a planetary, hollow sphere is minimized since capacitance would be enhanced and also if the planet's radius is increased. This increase in capacitance would also raise electrical resistance and, thus, also diminish how much magnetic charge could be transferred to a hollow, spheroidal planetary body upon its magnetization by some external (or internal?) force (at its center of hollowness?).

Quote:
The toroidal shape of a core is preferred since the magnetic path is closed, there are no magnetic poles and thus very little external flux. This allows the cores to be packed closely together without allowing their magnetic fields to interact. -- Magnetic-core memory
So, a Perpetual Motion Holder capable of holding a larger charge would be a magnetizable ring which is very stout and very broad. All that is required is to induce a magnetic field in a PMH at right angles to the direction across the segments of magnetizable mass that we wish to hold together.

Now, anybody want to guess how any of this could be applicable to resolving the mystery of how did Edward Leedskalnin build his coral castle?

Or, how about the magnetic force binding an atom's constituent ingredients (of protons, etc) to generate its own pseudo-gravitational force holding itself together in the form of an atomic-sized PMH?

Wow! My head is swirling.....

I'll go one step further and stick my neck out even more than I have already...

If a condition, within a circuit powered by alternating current, could be arranged in which one side of a transformer is composed of high voltage and low current while the other side of this transformer is composed of high current, but no voltage, then we will have constructed a PMH in the area of high current without voltage. This latter area will produce all the current we need, endlessly, provided we maintain one salient feature: that both areas must possess a 180 degree phase shift between the voltage and the current portions of their sine waves at all times.

Voltage and resistance always coexist. Both may be overcome when current, alone, dominates one section of a circuit. Then, whatever resistance exists within this area becomes, as it were, invisible to current traversing through this area. And without resistance having any impact, a PMH can release its potential energy without ever losing it since there won't be any resistance to convert it into voltage.

And without any voltage to drop, there isn't any back EMF, either.

Obviously, then, resistance only applies to positive current. While negative current (aka, negative resistance) is accelerated by resistance rather than impeded by it.

Or put more succinctly...

Time is a measure of entropy. It serves no other purpose other than its consequential inverse, namely: backwards time is a measure of negentropy. Without time, eternity replaces change making entropy and its opposing negentropy meaningless.

EMF is not a dipolar force. It is a monopolar force pre-existing outside of relativity. Only upon its inclusion inside of relativity does it gain a polarity of charges. This is due to its interaction with the two monopolar forces of north pole magneto and south pole magneto. The magnetomotive is a subatomic force while the electromotive is a proto-, or pre-, atomic force. The magneto forces are circular and orbital while the electro forces are linear within the field of the magneto. Outside of the magneto's influence, the electro's linearity has no meaning, nor does it serve any purpose since eternity never goes anywhere it hasn't arrived at already.

These two monopolar magnets were first brought to the attention of our collective unconscious by Edward Leedskalnin. He said that they travel in opposing directions in a circuit. This would make one of these two forces known to us as “conventional current” flowing in the same direction as the markings on a diode while its opposing force flows in the opposite direction we have designated as the flow of electrons through a circuit. But this condition only exists whenever current and voltage are in phase by zero degrees of separation – particularly affecting A/C circuits.

But when current and voltage are out-of-phase by 180° of separation, then these two monopolar forces flow in the same direction resulting in negentropy.

If they were to flow in the conventional manner opposing one another, then entropy is the natural result.

But if they flow in the same direction, then there is no reason for any resistance to register a drop in voltage. Instead, resistance accelerates their speed.

This is how to liberate force from out of a PMH without cost since no voltage will ever drop so long as current and voltage are a full 180° out-of-sync.


https://physics.stackexchange.com/qu.../476189#476189
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 04-27-2019 at 12:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 04-26-2019, 07:45 PM
spacecase0's Avatar
spacecase0 spacecase0 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 411
just to add to what you just said,
remember that core memory is basically the same thing.
they worked out very well how to write and read the magnetic field.
read about that version here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 04-27-2019, 12:29 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 495
Perfect! Thanks...

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecase0 View Post
just to add to what you just said,
remember that core memory is basically the same thing.
they worked out very well how to write and read the magnetic field.
read about that version here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory
This did it for me. A toroidal shape is a must.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old 04-27-2019, 03:30 PM
bistander bistander is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,514
Gravity and How to Extract Energy from out of a PMH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
Quote:
Question
Edward Leedskalnin (Coral Castle) describes a perpetual motion holder in his writings. I've built one and pretty much know how it works (I think). It is NOT a perpetual motion device by any means, but more like a magnetic version of a capacitor. That, I think, is the best way to describe it. (I never saw this effect demonstrated in grade school or college, which sort of surprises me.) It can be seen demonstrated here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhiAIsJCS9Y

and here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJSDYYaF3LA -- dead link

(NOT an unknown phenomena....)

The closest conventional use I could find of an internal, stable magnetic field is the field creation in magnetic core memory toroids.

My question is: How stable is this field? Would it really last forever, or at least many, many years?

It seems that it would have less leakage than a capacitor (holding an electric field), so I'm guessing it's holding capacity would be many years. I'm also assuming that nothing is "moving" but a stable configuration of magnetic domains is created by the brief electric field (which can then be removed) which maintains the (internal) magnetic field due to their alignment. Is this correct?

(NOTE: electric energy can be retrieved from the field by wrapping a coil of wire around the material and breaking the connection. The collapse of the magnetic field induces an electric current which can light a lamp or LED with a brief pulse of current.)
Answer
Since the radius of an eddy current, not the mass holding the magnetic eddy, determines its intensity, time is of no consequence.

Despite the use of energy to induce a magnetic eddy (and electromagnetic energy is time-dependent), and despite the reverse polarity of an eddy, the eddy itself is not energetic since the duration of electromagnetic inducement is not a factor which alters the storage capacity of a magnetic eddy within Perpetual Motion Holder material. Thus, a magnetic eddy is a force devoid of the component of time rather than an expression of energy (which must include time to have any meaning).

Thus, to answer your question using mere logical deduction (devoid of experimentation) predicated on what is already known about magnetic eddy currents, the charge in a PMH will last forever.

The magnetic permeability of the material, and its mass, will merely determine how much force gets transferred to the material from the exterior magnetic field used to induce the magnetic eddy and, thus, also determine how much loss occurs in a transformer core (for instance) whenever electrical energy is attempting to transfer from the primary coil of a transformer to its secondary.

Magnetic permeability will also determine how much loss occurs when the PMH is broken to release its stored potential.

Maybe, it would be more common sensical to replace my use of the term: “force” with the more pragmatic term of: “potential energy”?

Thus, it will be possible to hypothesize that a PMH is converting kinetic into potential energy during its charging and is conversely converting potential into kinetic energy during its release?

As an aside... A PMH is the simplest confirmation of -- what we've mistaken to be a separate force known as -- gravity generated by the magnetic lock of a hollow planet.

The radius of a planet (and its magnetic permeability), not its mass, is directly proportional to its gravitational field since the intensity of an eddy current is likewise directly proportional to the radius of a magnetic eddy. This magnetic lock (popularly referred to as gravity) may be jeopardized if the thickness of a planetary, hollow sphere is minimized since capacitance would be enhanced and also if the planet's radius is increased. This increase in capacitance would also raise electrical resistance and, thus, also diminish how much magnetic charge could be transferred to a hollow, spheroidal planetary body upon its magnetization by some external (or internal?) force (at its center of hollowness?).



So, a Perpetual Motion Holder capable of holding a larger charge would be a magnetizable ring which is very stout and very broad. All that is required is to induce a magnetic field in a PMH at right angles to the direction across the segments of magnetizable mass that we wish to hold together.

Now, anybody want to guess how any of this could be applicable to resolving the mystery of how did Edward Leedskalnin build his coral castle?

Or, how about the magnetic force binding an atom's constituent ingredients (of protons, etc) to generate its own pseudo-gravitational force holding itself together in the form of an atomic-sized PMH?

Wow! My head is swirling.....

I'll go one step further and stick my neck out even more than I have already...

If a condition, within a circuit powered by alternating current, could be arranged in which one side of a transformer is composed of high voltage and low current while the other side of this transformer is composed of high current, but no voltage, then we will have constructed a PMH in the area of high current without voltage. This latter area will produce all the current we need, endlessly, provided we maintain one salient feature: that both areas must possess a 180 degree phase shift between the voltage and the current portions of their sine waves at all times.

Voltage and resistance always coexist. Both may be overcome when current, alone, dominates one section of a circuit. Then, whatever resistance exists within this area becomes, as it were, invisible to current traversing through this area. And without resistance having any impact, a PMH can release its potential energy without ever losing it since there won't be any resistance to convert it into voltage.

And without any voltage to drop, there isn't any back EMF, either.

Obviously, then, resistance only applies to positive current. While negative current (aka, negative resistance) is accelerated by resistance rather than impeded by it.

Or put more succinctly...

Time is a measure of entropy. It serves no other purpose other than its consequential inverse, namely: backwards time is a measure of negentropy. Without time, eternity replaces change making entropy and its opposing negentropy meaningless.

EMF is not a dipolar force. It is a monopolar force pre-existing outside of relativity. Only upon its inclusion inside of relativity does it gain a polarity of charges. This is due to its interaction with the two monopolar forces of north pole magneto and south pole magneto. The magnetomotive is a subatomic force while the electromotive is a proto-, or pre-, atomic force. The magneto forces are circular and orbital while the electro forces are linear within the field of the magneto. Outside of the magneto's influence, the electro's linearity has no meaning, nor does it serve any purpose since eternity never goes anywhere it hasn't arrived at already.

These two monopolar magnets were first brought to the attention of our collective unconscious by Edward Leedskalnin. He said that they travel in opposing directions in a circuit. This would make one of these two forces known to us as “conventional current” flowing in the same direction as the markings on a diode while its opposing force flows in the opposite direction we have designated as the flow of electrons through a circuit. But this condition only exists whenever current and voltage are in phase by zero degrees of separation – particularly affecting A/C circuits.

But when current and voltage are out-of-phase by 180° of separation, then these two monopolar forces flow in the same direction resulting in negentropy.

If they were to flow in the conventional manner opposing one another, then entropy is the natural result.

But if they flow in the same direction, then there is no reason for any resistance to register a drop in voltage. Instead, resistance accelerates their speed.

This is how to liberate force from out of a PMH without cost since no voltage will ever drop so long as current and voltage are a full 180° out-of-sync.


https://physics.stackexchange.com/qu.../476189#476189
Hi Vinyasi,

I notice that your "answer" on the stackexchange has disappeared. It was there yesterday; gone today. What happened?

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old 04-28-2019, 12:14 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 495
Unhappy 4 thumbs down votes sends it to the toilet!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Hi Vinyasi,

I notice that your "answer" on the stackexchange has disappeared. It was there yesterday; gone today. What happened?

bi
Last time I checked yesterday, it was at negative 3 with a warning that one more negative vote will trash it and someone had posted a complaint that it meandered. I agreed with him by claiming that one thing leads to another.

I just got off the phone with a friend who wanted to go there and vote for me if it will help. I thought of this yesterday. Maybe I should have posted a request, here, for people to go there and vote to preserve it?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old 04-28-2019, 08:00 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
How to extract energy from a PMH?

This thread
ANOTHER Basic Free Energy Device

Post # 18 lays out everything I shared with a process and what you will learn.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old 04-29-2019, 04:43 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 495
Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
This thread
ANOTHER Basic Free Energy Device

Post # 18 lays out everything I shared with a process and what you will learn.
You've inspired me to improve my circuit simulation of a shorted motor which, due to its removal at Wikimedia Commons and my account at archive dot org, I've gone private with it. But I'm including it the next English edition and in a Spanish translation both of which will be posted, soon, at Amazon....

http://amazon.com/author/vinyasi

What you did was got me to thinking about the DC portion of my simulation which I didn't think there was any possibility for improvement. But I'm not trained, nor am I experienced, in this field. So, I run strictly on inspiration.

I also posted a simulation based on Paul Falstad's simulator which I had worked on a few months ago when I first read your post on this Basic Free Energy Device, but failed to post until now...

Nutty PMH ---- http://is.gd/realpmh

Thanks, again!

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old 05-15-2019, 03:54 AM
Pot head's Avatar
Pot head Pot head is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Nunya
Posts: 150
I saw the video and wonder if the effect is used in the way John Bedini has found out that a triggering device will unlock the electromagnetic field by using the energy to charge a battery?
I use two stock coils from TeslaGenX in parallel to run a very large sg unit and that is just one circuit board. My machine did run itself and with overunity it charged my house battery bank for inverting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cody View Post
I built a little demo to show how easy you can put one of these together. Its a very interesting device to match an interesting man.
YouTube - Ed Leedskalnin Magnet
__________________
I have been to another planet. It’s called My Family.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers