Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2019 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 SEATS AVAILABLE!

2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference
ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 SEATS AVAILABLE - LIMITED SEATING
Get your tickets now: http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-12-2009, 07:08 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
High Voltage from Thin Air?

Hello;

I present a question to those that have a SEC Exciter, what is the minimum parts count (configuration) of an Exciter that is required to obtain HV in excess of 300V from an input of 18V.

No! you do not use a step up transformer and you do not use voltage multipliers. What you do is to ping the 'Energy Lattice' and capture the return.

Sounds and is simple. What is required is a 'Spatial Gate'.

See a new section I am starting at www.drstiffler.com/sgate.htm

Willing to participate here if you are a worker and not a talker like on another forum I left because it was full of dysfunctional people. I want to provide as much information to working researchers as possible, but will not accept ignorance.

BTW

I do not believe in OU, what it should be called is CEC for 'Cohered Energy Coefficient', which is a far more accurate way of looking at things. A conversion of one energy form to another with a 'mathematical' gain. No creation of energy, just a cleaner conversion between forms.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 03-12-2009, 07:34 PM
Joit Joit is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,993
Hi and then

Very interresting Page, and a lot Stuff to look through.

I think there are less familar with this Concepts, but i am positive,
if something looks like it works, you will get couple Helpers.

And btw, i still belive in OU, when you see, the output is way better as the Input, like H. Johnsons Magnet motor, and just, to keep things simple
__________________
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2009, 07:38 PM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
I really honestly hope for the discussion of your work, that the people in this forum have a more scientific approach to new information presented to them and the agility to actually reproduce the experiments rather than sitting in their chairs and lazily flaming everything.

The earth ground configuration certainly has a lot of potential (in 2 meanings)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2009, 07:53 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joit View Post
Hi and then

Very interresting Page, and a lot Stuff to look through.

I think there are less familar with this Concepts, but i am positive,
if something looks like it works, you will get couple Helpers.

And btw, i still belive in OU, when you see, the output is way better as the Input, like H. Johnsons Magnet motor, and just, to keep things simple
The connotation of OU (Overunity Unity) is a bad acronym, the reason is that it gives the impression that something is obtained from nothing and by doing so we can obtain what is also a misnomer 'A Self Running' machine or device. The Universe in which we exist is full of energy, but in many ways is like a vitamin K injection, until you have one, the energy you feel is not present in any other way.

NEVER will the idea of being able to obtain a gain in energy (really a conversion) ever be accepted so long as we have these stupid concepts of free runners and energy from nothing. There is a FINITE amount of energy in the universe which is defined by the mass of the universe, we can not change that, but we can convert one form to another which in our limited view appears to be that old out dated 'OU' so many hang on to.

I accept what you are saying, but maybe the term 'CEC' which could mean 'Converted Energy Coefficient' would be better than OU? I Use 'Cohered Energy Coefficient' because I (Collect and Convert) other forms of available energy to a form that can be used and "APPEARS" to be your 'OU', but it is indeed not.

Hey maybe this will help, look at a flowing river and you see massive amounts of water flowing past a reference point, yet you can not in you mind grasp the energy that you are seeing, but allow that water to turn turbines and look at the meters and hey, we have Mega Kilowatts. This is how simple it is in the understanding. No Magic, a mere manipulation of what is already here into something we can use in a form we understand.

Make any sense?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2009, 08:23 PM
Jetijs's Avatar
Jetijs Jetijs is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,134
Hi DrStiffler!


Glad to have you here!
__________________
It's better to wear off by working than to rust by doing nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2009, 08:23 PM
Joit Joit is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,993
I guess, we are coming offtopic :P.

I think, as someone did start to use the word Over unity, he was more open minded, but Peoples tend to like to specify every Meaning of all Things, and that is, what it maybe did become a bad Taste.
Even like 'Free Energy', some take it as, there is somewhere a Big Pot, what you can grab into it, and get Free energy, or its free like, it flys around, and you only need to have One certain Reciever, to catch it.

And i guess i see what you mean, just to use the existing Ressources and use them well.
Like i saw a Vid today, where J.Newman said, there are a lot of Forces, what gives us acces to the energy, what flows like a River. (Omy, i do read to much about him right now)
But i think, there is a other Way too, to get Things over the Limit, as wich we know right now.

Other Side, for me is the Universum a big Pice of some basic Elements, maybe more, maybe less basics, but a huuge Ammount of Energy.
But even it will maybe die once, to be reborn, but there are anywhere a lot Things, what you can use them for your advantage.
And same with a Magnet, 2 Poles, and one neutral dead Zone.
And i think in all Directions, how you can use Things proper, to got them working over her Efficience.
So, anyhow, i think, its even possible, to make, create Energy, and someone postet here allready, Energy/Current is probatly only the Garbage of the Universe.
But there should allways be a Relation between give and take.

But anyway, everyone should use it, as it fits for him, and not bend hisself for a special Phrase, even, when the Word CEC give more Room about, to think about Things

Edit And well, maybe its, because i allways think about, where the River comes from.
__________________
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

Last edited by Joit; 03-12-2009 at 08:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2009, 08:37 PM
darkwizard's Avatar
darkwizard darkwizard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Argentina
Posts: 338
Send a message via MSN to darkwizard
Negative energy can be created.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2009, 09:12 PM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
I am wondering at what range the SEC exciter jams the radio transmission?
Are we talking about 2 or 3 meters or hundreds of meters?
This would make it impossible to operate a SEC in my appartment at least.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2009, 09:19 PM
Mutten Mutten is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
Welcome Dr Stiffler. I'm happy to see you found your way over here. We've been discussing some of your work in another thread. Avramenko's plug - Single wire power

I've been following your work for around a year now, and have recently had the time to start experimenting with your SEC15-3.

My replication stage is somewhere around the Coolwhite series. Still working on tuning but the more I play with this circuit the more I have to say this is damn cool!

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...oo/SEC15-3.jpg
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2009, 09:45 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomorph View Post
I am wondering at what range the SEC exciter jams the radio transmission?
Are we talking about 2 or 3 meters or hundreds of meters?
This would make it impossible to operate a SEC in my appartment at least.
The SEC Exciters can be placed in shields (similar to Faraday Cages) and the radiation into the environment is about equal to a Dell Desk Top Computer.

The radiation around an Exciter is fairly uniform to a specific distance, at which point it drops much faster than the inverse square law. In practice a basic experimental SEC will when operated at less than 24V will emit a field that will cause interference up to 20m, yet this depends on tuning and can be as low as 6m. When I talk about a standard 15-3 I mean one that has an input of less than 1.5W.

Tuning has an effect because a 15-3 can be tuned from a bandwidth of 300 to 600 MHz in width with the low end peak around 9 MHz. The AM Band is not a problem unless you are using a Spatial Gate. The AV Plug outputs seem to limit the low end to about 4.5 MHz and up.

Yes, it can cause a problem in an apartment or with you neighbors, yet a production unit (one designed for a specific purpose) can be controlled.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-12-2009, 10:09 PM
Joit Joit is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,993
Question about the Spartial Gate
At the Schematics is a Load. What Kind of load is it, like a Resistor and for what is it for?
__________________
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 03-12-2009, 10:22 PM
Mutten Mutten is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrStiffler View Post
The SEC Exciters can be placed in shields (similar to Faraday Cages) and the radiation into the environment is about equal to a Dell Desk Top Computer.

The radiation around an Exciter is fairly uniform to a specific distance, at which point it drops much faster than the inverse square law. In practice a basic experimental SEC will when operated at less than 24V will emit a field that will cause interference up to 20m, yet this depends on tuning and can be as low as 6m. When I talk about a standard 15-3 I mean one that has an input of less than 1.5W.

Tuning has an effect because a 15-3 can be tuned from a bandwidth of 300 to 600 MHz in width with the low end peak around 9 MHz. The AM Band is not a problem unless you are using a Spatial Gate. The AV Plug outputs seem to limit the low end to about 4.5 MHz and up.

Yes, it can cause a problem in an apartment or with you neighbors, yet a production unit (one designed for a specific purpose) can be controlled.
I was doing some battery charging tests this past weekend and had to run out to the store and when I got in my car and turned the radio on I noticed I could hear the SEC15-3 about 15 feet outside my house, through the radio, but as soon as I pulled out of the driveway it went away.

Later when I came home I used my police scanner set on scan in the lower FM bands and could clearly pick up some kind of beat frequency coming from it.

No spectrum analyzer, yet. Working on it~.

So yeah if you have close neighbors, might want to shield it
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-12-2009, 10:25 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joit View Post
Question about the Spartial Gate
At the Schematics is a Load. What Kind of load is it, like a Resistor and for what is it for?
A non or minimally reactive load, resistance, bridge rectifier to a filtered load (which can be reactive) or electrolyzer.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:33 AM
amigo's Avatar
amigo amigo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 744
Hey doc,

Happy to have you join and participate the forum.

I wonder about the Spatial Gate, does it have to be copper? Not that sourcing copper is a problem, but I wonder does the element (metal?) play a specific role.

How would Aluminium perform for example, or Carbon, or even a semi-conductor?

What if the gate was plasma based (rarified air environment or noble gas even) instead of a solid?

Do we really only look for capacitative coupling (copper/plastic as in your Spatial Gate), or if there's more to it...

Remember in Cool White there was a beaker with (and without) water, which in my mind was forming a Leyden Jar. Technically then if we made the "gate" bigger, would we get higher gains (it would need to be tuned with L3 and the load, no)?
__________________
Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:49 AM
Jules Tresor's Avatar
Jules Tresor Jules Tresor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 364
Welcome Dr. Stiffler !

Glad to see you here Dr. Stiffler.

I have had some success reproducing your circuit and obtening high voltages.
It's just great and so simple to build. I think I had wrong transistors because I couldn't get Fluo Tubes to light, just got neo bulbs to light, and I run a small DC motor at the same time, like in one of your older circuit

Now I can see that you made very important discovery that should bring much higher potential to your circuit ... mass, mass and mass again !

Exciting a metallic mass and collecting lots of radiant energy ... it remembers me M. Newman that says that the bigger the mass of copper, the bigger the energy collected.

Actually you SEC seems to do the job of a Tesla Coil, and connecting an 'emitting antenna' to it, gives you the possibility to radiate energy, that you collect with an other antenna connected to ground.
Am I right to say that it's a Tesla concept but with your SEC in place of a Tesla coil, and that makes things easier because we also don't need another Tesla coil at the reception side ?

Your Cool White video with the 2 Fluo Tubes between 2 copper plates and a ground impressed me very much, giving a flux of hope in my heart for 'cheap' lighting!

Now you are bringing cooling also, so where are you going to stop !?!?!

Reading Dr. Reich about Orgone and Dore I think that you get headaches with the experiment with the large blocks of aluminum because aluminium is producing bad Orgone ...

Anyway I consider myself as an ignorant in this domain, so I won't post here unless I have something to share. This post was just to give you a from the heart, because I was very sad the way they wasted your thread on another forum, considering the unvaluable importance of your discovered circuit. God bless you.

Thanks for sharing so much Dr.
MDG
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:49 AM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by amigo View Post
Hey doc,

Happy to have you join and participate the forum.

I wonder about the Spatial Gate, does it have to be copper? Not that sourcing copper is a problem, but I wonder does the element (metal?) play a specific role.

How would Aluminium perform for example, or Carbon, or even a semi-conductor

What if the gate was plasma based (rarified air environment or noble gas even) instead of a solid?

Do we really only look for capacitative coupling (copper/plastic as in your Spatial Gate), or if there's more to it...

Remember in Cool White there was a beaker with (and without) water, which in my mind was forming a Leyden Jar. Technically then if we made the "gate" bigger, would we get higher gains (it would need to be tuned with L3 and the load, no)?
WOW! A hundred questions.

In the next three days I will have more info on my site and it will answer some of your questions, yet in short for this Gate design either Cu or Al. The issues of L3 is moot with this Gate, it is not used, neither is C2.

The 'Load' can be low R for modest HV and higher current and you can go to like 10K for the load and supply FL's while getting good heat from the 10K.

When you look at the first diagram one might be tempted to think of it as a tuned line (no tuning present) but it is more productive to look at Dr. Aspdens work with the cylinder capacitors and the idea of energy capture within the plates.

I will revisit you questions after I get more on the page as it should make more sense and reduce many questions. But do ask if it does not help explain much of it.

Gas? Now you are going to have to wait on that, although a small hint, been there done that some years back and it worked well with Xenon.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:06 AM
amigo's Avatar
amigo amigo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 744
@DrStiffler,

Thanks for the quick reply!

Actually, I'll go read Dr.Aspden's cited work again, as it has been awhile since I last read that and because we are working in that area better to freshen up on it.

As stephenafreter noted above, maybe we should stay away from Aluminium and stick with Copper because of DOR, as you never know when you are producing one until it starts to hurt.

And I've recently read the "horror stories" about Oranur that Peter (Lindemann) wrote in BSRF Journals, so it raised my concern even more.

Hera are the links for your perusal:

http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/oranur1.pdf

http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/oranur2.pdf
__________________
Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:17 AM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenafreter View Post
Glad to see you here Dr. Stiffler.

I have had some success reproducing your circuit and obtening high voltages.
It's just great and so simple to build. I think I had wrong transistors because I couldn't get Fluo Tubes to light, just got neo bulbs to light, and I run a small DC motor at the same time, like in one of your older circuit

Now I can see that you made very important discovery that should bring much higher potential to your circuit ... mass, mass and mass again !

Exciting a metallic mass and collecting lots of radiant energy ... it remembers me M. Newman that says that the bigger the mass of copper, the bigger the energy collected.

Actually you SEC seems to do the job of a Tesla Coil, and connecting an 'emitting antenna' to it, gives you the possibility to radiate energy, that you collect with an other antenna connected to ground.
Am I right to say that it's a Tesla concept but with your SEC in place of a Tesla coil, and that makes things easier because we also don't need another Tesla coil at the reception side ?

Your Cool White video with the 2 Fluo Tubes between 2 copper plates and a ground impressed me very much, giving a flux of hope in my heart for 'cheap' lighting!

Now you are bringing cooling also, so where are you going to stop !?!?!

Reading Dr. Reich about Orgone and Dore I think that you get headaches with the experiment with the large blocks of aluminum because aluminium is producing bad Orgone ...

Anyway I consider myself as an ignorant in this domain, so I won't post here unless I have something to share. This post was just to give you a from the heart, because I was very sad the way they wasted your thread on another forum, considering the unvaluable importance of your discovered circuit. God bless you.

Thanks for sharing so much Dr.
MDG
Well glad to be here, hard to believe that it appears to be a group of civil and interested people.

And you are welcome.....

Over many years of work in electronics I often experienced artifacts that were strange and impossible to understand from my training. I was taught to suppress oscillations and spurious signals, it was add filters as it is all bad. This of course is a false idea and direction because in the noise a self induced oscillations we find the interface to one level of the 'Energy Lattice'.

My years of work were spent in getting a feel and good understanding for how to stabilize the chaos (where it all hides). I have seen and worked with many different ways to pull from the lattice and some more effective and many different manifestations in the returns, running from heat to cold and localized spatial modification. Many people over the last 150 years have seen most if not all of what I have seen, yet they focused on in most cases only one. My direction is to solve the interface in a way that it can be a producer of all the possible return.

My final systems will show this.

I am happy to see you have had success and you will be very interested in the Gate.

I think Tesla was a very talented man, along with many others before and after him, although I feel Tesla has been turned into a cult figure in order to distract people. It seems that Tesla has been given credit for everything including Milk, I don't buy it.....

Tesla gave use many things, but to fixate on him and his work (not all known), is a means to no end.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:16 AM
lighty's Avatar
lighty lighty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Croatia
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrStiffler View Post
Sounds and is simple. What is required is a 'Spatial Gate'.

See a new section I am starting at www.drstiffler.com/sgate.htm


Now, that is an interesting concept. Do you by any chance have any measurement results and specs?


BTW- welcome to this little oasis of sanity where dysfunctional people are very rare.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-13-2009, 08:15 AM
Hoppy Hoppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrStiffler View Post
Hello;

BTW

I do not believe in OU, what it should be called is CEC for 'Cohered Energy Coefficient', which is a far more accurate way of looking at things. A conversion of one energy form to another with a 'mathematical' gain. No creation of energy, just a cleaner conversion between forms.
Hello Dr. Stiffler

This is an excellent description of what I believe we should be striving to achieve; not all this OU mumbo jumbo.




Hoppy
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:26 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by lighty View Post
Now, that is an interesting concept. Do you by any chance have any measurement results and specs?


BTW- welcome to this little oasis of sanity where dysfunctional people are very rare.
Yes I do, but let me first explain how I prefer to release data.

I have so many time been called on the carpet because my data is not somewhat centralized. Once its out there it will never go away.

With this in mind I prefer to answer question on subjects and data for which I am sure and may have or have not posted to my site. In this way we can all have the same numbers and understanding of the idiosyncrasy that may be involved.

I hope to over the week end place data on my site on the Gate. For now it is very similar to the VLT work, without the coils.

Someday I will resist talking about anything until I can supply all the info to go with it, yet I think many smart people are working on this and it must get out there even if in small parts at a time.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:02 PM
Joit Joit is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,993
Btw I asked about he Load, because some Motors seems need to have a load, to perform better.
But i think, i found an Answer somewhere else about the Why, Charge puts the EM Field in, Load takes the EM out.
Thanks for Answer anyway.
__________________
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

Last edited by Joit; 03-13-2009 at 03:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:39 PM
lighty's Avatar
lighty lighty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Croatia
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrStiffler View Post
I think Tesla was a very talented man, along with many others before and after him, although I feel Tesla has been turned into a cult figure in order to distract people. It seems that Tesla has been given credit for everything including Milk, I don't buy it.....

Tesla gave use many things, but to fixate on him and his work (not all known), is a means to no end.

Ah, you already have my sympathies for saying the same thing that I've been saying for years now. Tesla was but a man and fallible as any of us. Even as an engineer and scientist he made mistakes and had some misconceptions. The science evolved and although some of his concepts are not yet employed commercially most of them are already very well explained for people who wants to hear about it. That especially goes for his single wire transmission system (wireless system is one and the same thing only using ground as a single wire conductor) which is already economically viable and well understood by Russian team of Strebkov, Zaev and late Avramenko.


As for your organizing the data, I agree with you that unorganized data can be a nuisance when you dealing with stuff which are a bit "exotic" from a point of view of common engineering practice. So, by all means sort and organize data, there is no hurry, the sky is not falling.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-14-2009, 02:56 AM
Mutten Mutten is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
Built an SGate today and just finished getting it together. Results are similar to Dr Stiffler.

3 second time exposure, light on in the other room. Flash kept killing the red glow of the bulb.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...5-3gate006.jpg

5 second exposure. Neon isn't really this bright but it is fully lit up.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...5-3gate005.jpg

The Setup
Bulb is glowing slight red when I took that but the flash kills it so you can't see.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...5-3gate008.jpg

Amp draw seems a bit wonky. 17vdc 430ish milliamps.

Standard SEC15-3 setup with the addition of 470pf cap coming off the collector connecting to the SGate. L1 air core measures in at around 4.5uH. Didn't have a coil form for it so its held together with zipties. L2 adjustable from 1-7uH. L3 air core 24uH. Ignore the av plug and neon in the breadboard its disconnected.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:09 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutten View Post
Built an SGate today and just finished getting it together. Results are similar to Dr Stiffler.

3 second time exposure, light on in the other room. Flash kept killing the red glow of the bulb.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...5-3gate006.jpg

5 second exposure. Neon isn't really this bright but it is fully lit up.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...5-3gate005.jpg

The Setup
Bulb is glowing slight red when I took that but the flash kills it so you can't see.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/a...5-3gate008.jpg

Amp draw seems a bit wonky. 17vdc 430ish milliamps.

Standard SEC15-3 setup with the addition of 470pf cap coming off the collector connecting to the SGate. L1 air core measures in at around 4.5uH. Didn't have a coil form for it so its held together with zipties. L2 adjustable from 1-7uH. L3 air core 24uH. Ignore the av plug and neon in the breadboard its disconnected.
*Excellent*

I enjoy seeing a person that can take a small amount of information, add it to experience and cover with intelligence and make a system work. Isn't this the way it should be, no spoon feeding required.

I am happy to see that you were able to get the replication running without cylinder specifications. Once you properly adjust sizes you will be very happy with the results. Please look at my last video and try the 10K and 1ohm resistors with your setup, I would like to hear your results.

Great work indeed....
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:26 PM
Mutten Mutten is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
I just threw the SGate together with what felt right. Didn't measure anything but I am noticing that mass seems to play a role. Probably due to capacitive/inductive resonance.

I think the DMM I'm using doesn't like the sec15 because the numbers are all over the place depending on how its tuned. Working on getting an analog meter or a power supply. Just using some batteries right now.

Might be my L2 ferrite core. Gonna try something smaller and see if that helps.

I find this circuit to be fascinating. Keep up the good work Doc.

Question. Are there any other transistors that work? I just ordered 100 more MPSA06 since I've blown up most of my supply with mistakes/tinkering.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-14-2009, 03:40 PM
DrStiffler DrStiffler is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutten View Post
I just threw the SGate together with what felt right. Didn't measure anything but I am noticing that mass seems to play a role. Probably due to capacitive/inductive resonance.

I think the DMM I'm using doesn't like the sec15 because the numbers are all over the place depending on how its tuned. Working on getting an analog meter or a power supply. Just using some batteries right now.

Might be my L2 ferrite core. Gonna try something smaller and see if that helps.

I find this circuit to be fascinating. Keep up the good work Doc.

Question. Are there any other transistors that work? I just ordered 100 more MPSA06 since I've blown up most of my supply with mistakes/tinkering.
As far as transistors, I tried many, many different ones. Now be forewarned that not all MPSA06's will work either. I so hate when a project depends on a single part as much as the Exciters do, should that part be gone, so does SEC, at least at the present time.

Motorola Brand used to work but the last bunch I obtained did not. Vishay and Fairchild, with Fairchild being my best and most dependable ones. In case you or some one is not aware the unique oscillation is from the transistor and the best I can figure at this time is that it has to go with the particular geometry in the 06. Until I hear or find different this is where it stands.

Yes DVM, DMM or just about anything digital dislikes Exciters. Be very careful with camera's and laptops.

Please try the resistors (non-inductive) and get back.

Thank you for your work...........
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:00 PM
amigo's Avatar
amigo amigo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 744
Cool, Mutten, you are catching up fast.

I went today to Home Depot to get items for the Spatial Gate and lucked out since I was able to concoct something together from seemingly incompatible parts (see attached images).

I'm going to put the circuit together next and see what happens, will post more soon...

By the way, the space between the collector and ground cylinders can be changed, both slide over the center cylinder.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg spatial_gate_1.jpg (61.6 KB, 306 views)
File Type: jpg spatial_gate_2.jpg (51.3 KB, 243 views)
File Type: jpg spatial_gate_3.jpg (49.5 KB, 241 views)
__________________
Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?

Last edited by amigo; 03-14-2009 at 11:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-15-2009, 01:37 AM
amigo's Avatar
amigo amigo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 744
@all,

As promised here's the completed circuit replication. I have taken some creative liberty (Doc, please don't shoot me ) in not putting the circuit on the separate board as original demonstration, but directly wiring it on the gate's Collector cylinder.

I did this for two reasons: because I had an appropriate transistor (Fairchild PZTA06), and because I noticed that the transistor gets hot. By doing this I got two issues resolved, possible stray capacitance and cooling. The large pin at the top of the transistor is the Collector.

I left the wires of other components at their original length, but I could've shorten those as well. I did cheat on the L2 by using a pre-made choke instead of winding an air coil - I'll wind one tomorrow and replace.

There's no diode going from the power rail to the L2 though, as there wasn't one in the circuit on Dr.Stiffler's Spatial Gate page.

Included is the shot of my spectrum analyzer, set at 10MHz steps, with FM band at the far right, last two divisions, taken while I was holding the neon bulb to the Ground cylinder.

It also appears that my Spatial Gate produces AC, as indicated by the glow of both electrodes on the neon bulb.

The incandescent bulb is a 4W night lamp; the fluorescent is also 4W with a large 10K resistor for heat dissipation.

Current consumption, in mA, is shown on the DMM in each individual photo.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cool_white_spatial_gate_1.jpg (95.5 KB, 272 views)
File Type: jpg cool_white_spatial_gate_2.jpg (76.4 KB, 410 views)
File Type: jpg cool_white_spatial_gate_3.jpg (53.8 KB, 163 views)
File Type: jpg cool_white_spatial_gate_4.jpg (72.7 KB, 191 views)
File Type: jpg cool_white_spatial_gate_5.jpg (71.4 KB, 258 views)
__________________
Are the ravings of a lunatic signs of a genius?

Last edited by amigo; 03-15-2009 at 01:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-15-2009, 01:41 AM
Mutten Mutten is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 85
@Amigo, Much cleaner than what I threw together, just used some 1/2" and 3/4" piping and wrapped electrical tape around the smaller tube to get the spacing nice and tight.


@ Dr Stiffler, I've got 3 Fairchilds left from jameco, and ordered 100 MPSA06s from Newark, ON Semi's as per Amigos advice in another thread. I'll probably pick up some more Fairchilds later this week.

Was out all day, didn't get a chance to do much. I'll try some resistive loads if I can squeeze in some time.

I keep getting my inductors mixed up in discussion terms. Need to set myself straight.

As per http://67.76.235.52/SECExciter.asp

L1 From the power rail to the collector.
L2 From Collector to Load
L3 tunable.

For some reason I had it in my head L2 was the tunable. I think one of my previous posts was mixed.
__________________
 

Last edited by Mutten; 03-15-2009 at 01:51 AM. Reason: added info
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers