Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube ONLY 13% OF SEATS AVAILABLE!!!*** 2017 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***


* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #151  
Old 04-19-2009, 12:53 PM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,620
Well the issue I have with this is the way I run my coils. I have 2 magnets slamming into them before to hitting it with a charge. I know it presaturates, and I can see this on the scope. But I was trying to imagine the way to look at the grand total. Maybe some pre calculation for future project.

But that math of yours is above my head. LOL.

I am a trial and error technician.

Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #152  
Old 04-19-2009, 01:01 PM
nilrehob's Avatar
nilrehob nilrehob is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 683
@matt

I guess You could determine the 5*T point for a coil if You have a steady train of square-wave pulses going into the coil and then estimate when the coil is saturated by looking at the oscilloscope.
R is obtained by using a ohm-meter.
Then L=T*R
__________________
Hob Nilre
http://www.youtube.com/nilrehob
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 04-19-2009, 02:12 PM
lighty's Avatar
lighty lighty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Croatia
Posts: 388
@nilrehob

OK now I see what you're getting at. However I see a few problems with your logic.

First of all high voltage doesn't do anything for energization of coil. In order to produce inductive collapse you first need to have magnetic field. In order to produce magnetic field you need current and not voltage. Of course, higher voltage will help overcome resistance of the coil as dictated by Ohm's law and by having a higher current you will need less time to saturate core (stronger magnetic field because of the different ampere/turns ratio). However then you'll have a shorter, higher current impulse and I suspect you will see pretty much the same net energy consumption and that's of course if you don't subtract from your calculations wasted energy due to higher power dissipation of the coils due to resistance. You could of course try to compensate for power losses by optimizing Q factor for some given frequency or impulse length equivalent but then you're stuck with some limited frequency range.

Also, the shorter the impulse the more you have to take into account the hysteresis curve because core material need some time to saturate. Of course you can use HF materials with much narrower hysteresis curve but then you'll be stuck with less energy stored per cycle.

Sorry, but I still don't see the way to overcome some basic rules of magnetic engineering. I'm not saying it's not possible but maybe I'm still getting your idea wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 04-19-2009, 02:44 PM
nilrehob's Avatar
nilrehob nilrehob is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 683
@lighty

OK, conclusion: test it
I'll get back about this once I have done some testing.
__________________
Hob Nilre
http://www.youtube.com/nilrehob

Last edited by nilrehob; 04-19-2009 at 02:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 04-19-2009, 03:58 PM
lighty's Avatar
lighty lighty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Croatia
Posts: 388
LOL I think all has been said and done regarding core saturation in switching systems for the last hundred years- especially with the advancement of SMPS techniques. But if it gives you pleasure to experiment please do do. It can be fun. I experimented quite a lot with all different kind of setups just to get a more practical grip of the theoretical stuff I was taught. It always helps to see theory put in practice.

However be careful to do the proper measurement of current, voltage and precise impulse durations. Otherwise you might come to the erroneous results. It would also be of great help if you have RMS measurements on your scope.

Last edited by lighty; 04-19-2009 at 04:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 04-20-2009, 03:43 AM
cody cody is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 407
Aaron,


"LOL, agreed. But I do want to lead to that eventually in a different thread."

Are you ready to let us know what these other ways are? Are they relating to leedskalnin? Please post whatever it is you have, im interested
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 05-09-2009, 02:19 PM
nilrehob's Avatar
nilrehob nilrehob is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 683
I just stumbled across a patent by Rosemary Ainslie the other day:
(WO/1999/038247) HARNESSING A BACK EMF

In the 44-page pdf there are three descriptions of experiments on this subject well worth reading.
__________________
Hob Nilre
http://www.youtube.com/nilrehob
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 05-09-2009, 04:15 PM
petersone petersone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 59
Hi Hob Nilre
I read the doc.but could'nt see anything that a lot of people on the forums are'nt doing now.
peter
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 05-09-2009, 04:28 PM
nilrehob's Avatar
nilrehob nilrehob is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by petersone View Post
Hi Hob Nilre
I read the doc.but could'nt see anything that a lot of people on the forums are'nt doing now.
peter
Hi petersone,

Further back in this thread I asked for an experiment that would show me something that could not be explained by conventional textbook reasoning.
I thought I found that experiment within the patent above and so I wanted to share it with anyone else looking for the same.

Hob
__________________
Hob Nilre
http://www.youtube.com/nilrehob
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 05-09-2009, 06:38 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,563
other stuff

Hi Cody,

I just saw this. I may do something with this this spring.

Aaron

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody View Post
Aaron,


"LOL, agreed. But I do want to lead to that eventually in a different thread."

Are you ready to let us know what these other ways are? Are they relating to leedskalnin? Please post whatever it is you have, im interested
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #161  
Old 05-29-2010, 10:20 AM
pha3z pha3z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkwizard View Post
... like Jehovah or Yahweh or Elohim or Lucifer are names for the same god.
What bible you are quoting from?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 05-29-2010, 10:30 AM
pha3z pha3z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by boguslaw View Post
In PMH seems there is static magnetic field created which holds a lever,but I bet there are others configurations of iron and copper coils which create PULSATING magnetic field FOR FREE.

Either device such constructed will break from large current or create large and sustaining power output.

I've always said so, theory is simple and you will see that A LOT of free energy devices are using this scheme :

- create a lot of very weak but overunity 'kicks' in completely closed path
- use weak magnetic field generated by kicks to produce current (mostly on conductor surface)
- use positive feedback
- use a regulator to prevent damage to device

The simplest regulator is to CLOSE positive feedback loop using LOAD of some minimum resistance or impedance (vide Sweet VTA)
That's not a very good way but it seems to work.
I know its been over a year since this post, but whatever boguslaw is trying to do, he (or anyone else) might find Jean Louis Nadin's replication of the Steorn Orbo motor valueable. Here's the replication page: The Steorn Orbo motor replication by JL Naudin

The Orbo motor works like this:

Toroid Coil sits as the stator.
Rotor contains magnets which are attracted to the coil simply by natural magnetism. The coil is energized to temporarily eliminate magnetic field interaction (YES its the complete opposite of what you normally do with an electromagnet)!! Momentum carries the rotor on past.

It may relate to the unusual effects boguslaw is talking about.
__________________
 

Last edited by pha3z; 05-29-2010 at 11:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 09-20-2010, 11:41 AM
kaosad kaosad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Inductive spike vs. Back EMF

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
Back EMF is the same as Counter EMF and in either case, including Forward EMF, none of these are the inductive spike from a coil.

If he is saying in the book that forward emf is the inductive spike then he is misusing the entire concept of force as in electromotive force. Is there force with zero work or pure potential moving through a coil and out of it? It might sound good but is is like an oxymoron...kind of like "military intelligence."

I have the same book from a friend it is a great reference nevertheless.
Inductive spike or back EMF or counter EMF, they are all the same thing. The only difference is how the EMFs are generated.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 09-20-2010, 04:29 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,563
back emf and inductive spike completely different

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaosad View Post
Inductive spike or back EMF or counter EMF, they are all the same thing. The only difference is how the EMFs are generated.
You're free to believe what you want.

Back EMF voltage is ALWAYS LOWER than the source voltage. Not
higher such as the spike. They are not the same.

Back EMF is there DURING THE POWERING OF THE LOAD.
The INDUCTIVE SPIKE is there AFTER POWER IS REMOVED.

Please do your research. There is plenty here.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 09-21-2010, 08:13 AM
kaosad kaosad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
You're free to believe what you want.

Back EMF voltage is ALWAYS LOWER than the source voltage. Not
higher such as the spike. They are not the same.

Back EMF is there DURING THE POWERING OF THE LOAD.
The INDUCTIVE SPIKE is there AFTER POWER IS REMOVED.

Please do your research. There is plenty here.
It does not matter how great the resulting voltage is, the most important thing is that they both appear due to the effect of countering the contraction of magnetic field in the coil (directly or indirectly). They boil down to the same equation which governs the voltage measured, i.e.,

v = - N dO/dt (Faraday's law of induction),
where O is the magnetic flux, N is number of turns, t is time and v is back EMF.

(Note that I mentioned they boil down to the same equation, however they can appear in different form of equations. It is just a matter of derivation to convince yourself that they are the same.)

Whether you see the induced voltage high or low basically is due to the initial conditions of your electronic components that form the connected circuit. This is under your control, if you have the knowledge. For example you can make the inductive spike be merely over 0.7V in the first few cycles, by just placing a very large and fully discharged capacitor connected in series with silicon diode as in the famous SSG circuit.

As like what you have observed, the back-EMF appears during or after powering of load. This is just a matter of how you generate it, as what I have said in my first post. The phenomena is still explainable through Faraday's law of induction -- nothing surprising about that.
__________________
 

Last edited by kaosad; 09-21-2010 at 09:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:17 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,563
not the same

Back emf is still DURING the application of power.
Inductive spike is AFTER removing power.

The meaning is also self apparent in the words.

Inductive SPIKE - this is obviously when you take
aware the power.

BACK emf, this opposes the forward current and
the back emf is not a spike. It holds back and
limits the forward current, which an inductive spike
is NOT doing.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 09-22-2010, 02:52 AM
crackahcrackah crackahcrackah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
Back emf is still DURING the application of power.
Inductive spike is AFTER removing power.

The meaning is also self apparent in the words.

Inductive SPIKE - this is obviously when you take
aware the power.

BACK emf, this opposes the forward current and
the back emf is not a spike. It holds back and
limits the forward current, which an inductive spike
is NOT doing.
You can lead a horse to water...BTW thanks for reinforcing what Peter Lindemann demonstrated in his video on the secrets of the electric motor. A lack of reinforcement simply results in confusion on the issue.


While I'm at it, does any one have any links to sites where large scale, say...fork lift motor sized motors, have been constructed by DIYers? I doubt it's feasible but the price of those things really restricts options...
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 09-30-2010, 09:44 PM
plengo plengo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 281
@Aaron's

great topic. Where you are discussing this Spike Induction in further details, please?

Fausto.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:01 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,563
"Ongoing" thread

There is discussion on the spike in the thread "Ongoing".
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 09-30-2010, 11:48 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,014
I have to agree with Aaron here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
There is discussion on the spike in the thread "Ongoing".

The Bemf is a much different beast then the inductive spike. The bemf is countering the emf because of reflective induction. That comes from the design of the coil you use. Lets say bifilar wound as apposed to regular methods.

The spike is another event all together. The inductive spike is a response to the field collapse. As the field collapses it drags along with it natural energy from the outer reaches of that field. As we all know when you shrink down something like a balloon it's surface area shrinks as well. Lets say that as the balloon shrinks the amount of energy is amplified by the time it hits the coil and then gets induced into the coil because of the constricting field boundries. Tesla noticed the same thing as he was using two same mass electrodes to keep his transformer balanced but changed the surface area of the electrodes. If the polarity was right, the electrode with less surface area formed a more intense field effect then was thrown off of the large surface area one. It almost acted like it was amplified and in fact I believe thats the case.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #171  
Old 06-03-2011, 05:27 PM
antigraviticsystems1's Avatar
antigraviticsystems1 antigraviticsystems1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sagunto (VALENCIA) SPAIN
Posts: 181


Uploaded with ImageShack.us YouTube - ‪prueba campo magnetico rotatorio 2.MOV‬‏
__________________
must first understand the nature .... and then imitate

Last edited by antigraviticsystems1; 06-03-2011 at 05:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 03-09-2012, 07:12 AM
miltontr miltontr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: California
Posts: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to miltontr Send a message via Skype™ to miltontr
One possible explaination...

Hi All,

I wrote a white paper a few years back which I recently updated. The topic is the same being discussed and written from the perspective of Aaron's thinking. It's not very technical but hopefully it's helpful.

(white-paper attached)

Regards
miltontr

(3/9/2012 - Date on white-paper corrected)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Transients.pdf (268.4 KB, 60 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by miltontr; 03-09-2012 at 06:00 PM. Reason: Bad date on the Transients white paper attachment.
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:09 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,563
defeating the skepticlowns once again

Thank you for posting that miltontr!

I read over it briefly and will have some other look over it - it is late and I have to get to bed.

This concept is widely unknown by the masses and many self-proclaimed experts think they understand it as well.

For example - Milehigh from Quebec and Poynt99 a Canadian Mountie posted way back in the Ainslie discussion threads something that proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that the conventionally minded "experts" have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.

They claimed for example that because an inductive resistor (wire wound resistor made of nichrome wire in an ohmite resistor for example) is a resistor, that it will dissipate 100% of everything put into it.

Under normal circumstances such as a common resistive heating element, they are 100% efficient because they "burn" 100% of the watts that goes into them, which turns into heat - in that case they would be correct. And that is what we want in a resistive heating element.

However, they believe, and this is evidenced by their claims that are public record in that closed and locked thread, that in the inductive resistors, they will also burn 100% of anything that goes into them so there is nothing left.

All the evidence shows that Milehigh and Poynt99 are 100% wrong in their beliefs and analysis of reality. Basically, this means they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about and this applies to just about every pseudoskeptic out there, which are otherwise known as skepticlowns.

The fact is this - you charge a wirewound resistor and there is some dissipation, which causes heat. But, when you turn the power off, the magnetic field collapses in that wirewound (inductive) resistor and you get a spike back. THE MAGNETIC FIELD AND ENERGY DISSIPATED ARE INDEPENDENT OF EACH OTHER! They are not tied together.

Without even having to go into overunity, over 1.0 cop, etc... that simple fact in and of itself defeats the bogus arguments by amateur "skeptics" that you can't get anything back when you power an inductive resistor. If so, then how was I getting over 1000v spikes coming back from that resistor in addition to some recharging in the front battery since the mosfet shuttles the spike back to the front from the intrinsic "free wheeling diode", etc...

What this shows is that the "skeptics" have no idea what an inductor or electromagnetic coil are, they have no idea what they do and how they operate, and they have no idea of any of the real principles that are in effect when we are powering these devices.

It is completely ironic that those that claims that these perspectives are from crackpots are actually the biggest crackpots of them all!
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 03-09-2012, 05:42 PM
DilJalaay's Avatar
DilJalaay DilJalaay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 67
Lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by miltontr View Post
Hi All,

I wrote a white paper a few years back which I recently updated. The topic is the same being discussed and written from the perspective of Aaron's thinking. It's not very technical but hopefully it's helpful.

(white-paper attached)

Regards
miltontr
LOL,
Your attached Doc shows the date of May,08,2012.
Any way am gona read it.. will

Regs,
D.J
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 03-09-2012, 06:01 PM
miltontr miltontr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: California
Posts: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to miltontr Send a message via Skype™ to miltontr
Date corrected, thank you Sir. --Milton
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 03-10-2012, 07:13 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,403
Inductive spike, how is it called when it's send forward ? Like in Tesla coil ?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 11-12-2017, 10:36 PM
darediamond darediamond is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
Hi Everyone,

This does come up time to time and it isn't a matter of semantics. Back EMF simply is not the spike that you get from a coil when the field collapses.

You charge a coil - lenz's law describes the counter current or back emf that opposes the forward current and resists the forward current's ability to bring the coil's charge up...

Once the coil is charged and you disconnect power, the spike you get back is the "inductive spike" or "transient spike."

You can see Lenz's law here:
Faraday's Law
It is at the bottom.

Look at this nice simple answer:
WikiAnswers - What is the formula for transient spike computation in an inductive load

"E=I x R. The inductive spike occurs as the circuit is opened. The collapsing magnetic field causes the inductor to become the source of the circuit. For example consider a circuit consisting of a 10 volt battery, a 10 mh inductor, and a 10 ohm resistor all in series. With the switch closed, 1 amp will flow through the circuit (after 5 mS). The 5 mS is the time it takes the current to rise from 0 to 1 amp. This is given by the formual TC=L/R where TC is the time constant in seconds, L is the inductance in henries, and R is the resistance in ohms. It takes 5 time constants for the current to reach the maximum current which is determined by I=E/R (Ohm's Law). The delay is caused by the counter EMF generated in the coil as flux lines cut through adjacent turns of the inductor. After 5 time constants, the current is at 1 amp. When we open the switch, it will take 5 time constants for the current to drop to 0 amps. However, this will not be 5 mS because the resistance is now much larger do to the opening switch contacts. The voltage across the switch contacts will be whatever is necessary to maintain the current flow for the 5 time constants. After one time constant, the current will have dropped to 32% of the maximum current or in this case, 0.32 amps. If the resistance of the switch gap is 1 megohm, the the voltage will be 320,000 volts. More than enough to ionize the air and create a conductive path. If we assume an average resistance of 1 megohm, it will take 50 nS for the current to drop to 0. Of course during this time, the switch contact gets zapped. Placing a diode across the inductor such that the diode is reverse biased with the switch closed will give the current an alternate path as the polarity of the inductor reverses when the magnetic field collapses and the inductor becomes the source. This lowers the voltage from 1,000,000 volts to 0.7 volts. The downside is that the time it takes for the current decrease increases bo the ratio of 1,000,000/0.7. In a relay, this may cause the relay to "chatter" when opening. Adding a zener diode in series anode to anode with the spike suppressing diode will alleivate most chattering problems. A 34.3 volt zener will raise the voltage from 0,7v to 35v and shorten the time by a factor of 50 (35/.0.7). "

So you can see that it takes 5ms to charge the coil because the back emf opposes the forward current...that is the delay of charging the coil...the back emf.

You can see it takes 50ns to go back to 0. Why so fast? There is no more back emf opposing anything.

I don't agree that the calculation of the spike is as straight forward as this because other things come into play with sharp gradients.

But you can clearly see the back emf is NOT the spike that comes back. The spikes we are capturing and putting to use is the "inductive spike" or "transient spike" and I believe it does matter what it is called because there are very specific names for these very specific well-known events that have been established for a really long time.

People experimenting with the free energy stuff won't have much credibility in the general world of science calling the spike back emf.

They can believe what the want, that is fine but it is simply ample evidence for them to show that people in this "free energy" field don't even know what they're talking about and they would be correct. Let's not give them any ammunition. If they see that we do know the difference, it is just less resistance (back emf) that we have to work against in getting this stuff out there. It really is an inductive spike or transient spike and the back emf is already gone.
I am using one wire technology of Avramenko Plug to harvest Inductive kickback or back e.m.f in motionless setup. my unit uses 10W and it is generating 120W+!! This is not the regular way of harvesting back emf of Inductive K.B though because it involves attaining coil resonance which is a must.

The is one other thing that bit involves which I can not share here. To get good just from back emf, use extremely lengthy thick gauge of coated copper wire to make your coil and pulse it at it resonce frequency to turn the coil resistance to Zero!! That is one of the 4 secrets!. You need no high voltage input to the coil. 10Vdc or 36V is okay. Use High capacitance and voltage DC caps in your A.V.Plug to multiply to current and voltage and step it down into a stepdown transformer. Good luck!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old 11-16-2017, 06:26 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by darediamond View Post
I am using one wire technology of Avramenko Plug to harvest Inductive kickback or back e.m.f in motionless setup. my unit uses 10W and it is generating 120W+!! This is not the regular way of harvesting back emf of Inductive K.B though because it involves attaining coil resonance which is a must.

The is one other thing that bit involves which I can not share here. To get good just from back emf, use extremely lengthy thick gauge of coated copper wire to make your coil and pulse it at it resonce frequency to turn the coil resistance to Zero!! That is one of the 4 secrets!. You need no high voltage input to the coil. 10Vdc or 36V is okay. Use High capacitance and voltage DC caps in your A.V.Plug to multiply to current and voltage and step it down into a stepdown transformer. Good luck!
Great tips, darediamond. Thank you very much for sharing.
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers