Energetic Forum  

Go Back   Energetic Forum > Energetic Forum Discussion > Renewable Energy
Homepage Energetic Science Ministries Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Reply
 
LinkBack (6) Thread Tools
  #271 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2008, 08:58 PM
ren's Avatar
ren ren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 881
Actually I think a finer gauge will make it more efficient, just less powerful, so yes, perhaps less mechanically efficient, but electrically more efficient.

By the way, did you order SWG or AWG 24, because there is a difference?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #272 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2008, 09:08 PM
FranzOZ FranzOZ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Thank you very much for your answer; being a "perfectionist" I would order the 23 size (or may be I can lower a bit the number of turns to lower the resistence).
Mr. Bedini's drawing show the coil being 11/2" high and 1" diameter but nothing about the diameter of the core. Any advice on that ? I hope I'm not to much of a pain with my "beginer" questions.
Thanks a lot.
Franz
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #273 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:11 PM
FranzOZ FranzOZ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Thank you Ren.

Wire is AWG.
Why it would be more efficient electricaly with 24 ? (I don't know very much about coils and electromagnetism, just some basics).

Best regards,
Franz
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #274 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2008, 04:11 AM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 391
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranzOZ View Post
Mr. Bedini's drawing show the coil being 11/2" high and 1" diameter but nothing about the diameter of the core. Any advice on that ? I hope I'm not to much of a pain with my "beginer" questions.
Thanks a lot.
Franz
Hi Franz,

I think you may have the measurments a little off there , but that's ok. From what I can tell most of the coils have a 3.5" flange and are 4" long. The core is usualy 3/4". This is how I build mine anyway, and they work fine. A basic bifilar coil (800 or so turns) however will not fill a spool of that size, but once you start to add more power winds it will. Beginer questions are good, reminds us about the basics again. So ask away.

Cheers,

Steve.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #275 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2008, 06:58 PM
FranzOZ FranzOZ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Thank you Steve. The basic design calls for 450 turns, on the other hand you are talking about 800 turns - some other people use 600 or even 1000 windings. So what would be the most efficient number of turns ?; how much is to much ?
I think that on the trigger side a higher number of windings would increase the biasing voltage in the base of the transistor and on the power side would increase the radiant energy in the power coil along with the "kick" applied to the magnet. This if I'm right - considering my very limited knowledge.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #276 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2008, 05:43 AM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 391
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranzOZ View Post
Thank you Steve. The basic design calls for 450 turns, on the other hand you are talking about 800 turns - some other people use 600 or even 1000 windings. So what would be the most efficient number of turns ?; how much is to much ?
I think that on the trigger side a higher number of windings would increase the biasing voltage in the base of the transistor and on the power side would increase the radiant energy in the power coil along with the "kick" applied to the magnet. This if I'm right - considering my very limited knowledge.
Hi Franz,

To be honest I don't know what the optimal number of turns is. My first coil only had 360 or so turns. It worked ok but couldn't do much. The coils I have now are made by a transformer winder where I live, and I just give him the spool size (as in the above post) and tell him to fill it. Much easier than wearing away my fingertips winding them myself. I haven't got an official turn count off of him yet, but it would be between 800 and 1000. (that is with multiple windings ie. 5 or 6)

Cheers,

Steve.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #277 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2008, 05:55 AM
ren's Avatar
ren ren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 881
Hi FranzOZ,

If its electrical efficiency is measured by current draw, then a thinner gauge of the same length will have a lower current draw due to higher resistance. This may not translate to a higher mechanical efficiency however.bThats the basic of it as I see anyway. More turns equal stronger field, but not necessarily a higher voltage spike as some assume. The spike is best influenced by the speed of the switch, faster on and offs equal higher voltage spikes. This is why some people see higher spikes with relays I think.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #278 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2008, 04:24 PM
FranzOZ FranzOZ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by dambit View Post
Hi Franz,

To be honest I don't know what the optimal number of turns is. My first coil only had 360 or so turns. It worked ok but couldn't do much. The coils I have now are made by a transformer winder where I live, and I just give him the spool size (as in the above post) and tell him to fill it. Much easier than wearing away my fingertips winding them myself. I haven't got an official turn count off of him yet, but it would be between 800 and 1000. (that is with multiple windings ie. 5 or 6)

Cheers,

Steve.

Thanks Steve. Lucky you that you have this winder around ; I just hate winding coils , because of that I think to wind 3 ore 4 windings on my first coil, to have room for future expansion.

Take care,
Franz

Last edited by FranzOZ : 10-18-2008 at 04:39 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #279 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2008, 04:38 PM
FranzOZ FranzOZ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by ren View Post
Hi FranzOZ,

If its electrical efficiency is measured by current draw, then a thinner gauge of the same length will have a lower current draw due to higher resistance. This may not translate to a higher mechanical efficiency however.bThats the basic of it as I see anyway. More turns equal stronger field, but not necessarily a higher voltage spike as some assume. The spike is best influenced by the speed of the switch, faster on and offs equal higher voltage spikes. This is why some people see higher spikes with relays I think.
Thank you Ren, i thought of that, but how long a relay can last at this switching frequency ? If going electromechanicaly may be better using carbon brushes like the people from the Electrodyne Corp. did with the Tesla Switch that they build.

Best regards,
Franz
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #280 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2009, 04:45 PM
krispy krispy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3
HI Guys, Just getting started with my first attempt - A couple dumb questions to make sure I get it right the first time....

Can someone recommend the best Iron core diameter? the drawings show seem to imply a 1" OD spool flange x 1.5" tall? this seems small, but so is magnet wire! if these dimensions are the ones to use, then I would think the core could be no more than 3/8" diameter...could it be 1/2?

Also, I'm thinkning I'll use a piece of rebar for my core...any comments on this? If I cant find any welding rod this may be my best option.

Oh, and one more thing...can I wrap it directly to the core, or should there be a space? i.e, if I wrapped a typical plastic spool, and slid the core in afterwards? this could allow me to test with different core materials...

Thanks in advance for any advice guys, wish me luck!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
Reply


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/365-bedini-schoolgirl.html
Posted By For Type Date
Versión traducida de http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/365-bedini-schoolgirl.html This thread Refback 10-08-2007 12:30 PM
Renewable Energy This thread Refback 06-07-2007 01:37 AM
John Bedini | Radiant Energy This thread Refback 05-21-2007 12:32 PM
John Bedini | Radiant Energy This thread Refback 05-10-2007 12:37 PM
Noble Realms / At Last! Unified Field Philosophy Revealed for Spiritual & Scientific This thread Refback 05-03-2007 12:37 AM
Noble Realms / At Last! Unified Field Philosophy Revealed for Spiritual & Scientific This thread Refback 05-03-2007 12:23 AM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
2007 Copyright ? Energetic Forum? A Non Profit Corporation - All Rights Reserved