When i can im going to swap cap for a battery.
I think the battery will charge, start to tune itself and become a negative
resistor.

YouTube - BEDINI IMHOTEP BODKINS REPLICATION UPDATE3

Update3

What I have to change here to work with low consumption?
http://www.geocities.com/capecanaver...22/coildrv.htm

This may be a silly question Raoul, but I do not think it is made clear that the motor will NOT self start.

You [and other experimenters], must spin the fan, once you have everything connected, so that the trigger coils will generate current to power the transistor. Then it should continue to run.

If this still does not work, remove any resistors to the Base on the tranny and try again. If all connections are correct and transistor is okay, there is no reason why this shouldn't work. [This is assuming you have tested the re-wired motor, as per Imhotep's instructions].

If anyone is having problems, please go back to basics and start at the beginning. It is better to walk before you try to run,[sorry, not intended to be a Chinese proverb!]

[One other point about the relay Raoul if you missed it, using a magnet stuck to the side of relay allows you to tune the cfl etc, by moving the magnet to different positions. If you read through this thread from behinning, you'll find the info. or someone could clarify this?]

instruction videos for building the Imhotep-Bedini fan. There are 4 videos - go here:
Imhotep's Laboratory | Renewable Energy
~~~

Bodkins

Subject: Explanation of John Bedini's Formation of Negative Resistors in Batteries
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:27:23 -0500
From: Tom Bearden
To: Jerry W. Decker
CC: John Bedini

Jerry,
First we must...

Letter in its entirety at this link.
Bearden on Bedinis' Negative Resistance Effect - 04/09/00

"One can collect a billion watts of power from a millivolt, e.g.,
given enough intercepting charges q. The "magnitude"
of the potential isn't fixed at any point, because
the potential is a set of flows involving the
entire vacuum of the universe.
W=(phi)q
-Bearden

@ Bodkins.... were you thinking along the lines of this?
YouTube - Radiant Oscillator 6
here's a thread just started on it...
John Urbanowski Amazing Radiant Battery Charger

cheers

Thanks for the link DavidE.

VERY, VERY IMPRESSIVE - 'John Urbanowski Amazing Radiant Battery Charger'

Nearly 4 amps draw on battery, [no cfl's here!], yet only 800mA input will maintain the voltage.

"...he even had a 10 amp load on one 12v side of one battery and the voltage on that battery went from 12.25 to 12.22 after one hour"

Who says you can't re-charge the source battery?

"What is so remarkable in his circuit is the feed batteries are the same as his charge batteries"
- John Urbanowski Amazing Radiant Battery Charger

This is where we really want to go!

Congratulations to John Urbanowski and thank you gotoluc/goldenequity for sharing this with everyone.

All you true pioneers out there, will not sleep for weeks now

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
UPDATE...
Peter Lindermann has posted a reply dismissing the claims, called 'Time Will Tell'.
John Urbanowski Amazing Radiant Battery Charger

Please read in conjunction with John Urbanowski's claim and decide for yourself.

Superb description of the potential we are all experimenting with!

Thanks for finding the quote DavidE!

I also found this in there:

"Nelson and another engineer used an electric light bulb as the load, adjusted the pulses and timing appropriately, and produced a little unit which kept its battery charged while continuously illuminating the light bulb."

Thanks to you *Imhotep* and Shiva, we are getting to see how true this really is!

Now the next question is, how can we keep the supply battery charged?

I have found a new circuit similar to the one posted by Lidmotor in his video:
Ignition Coils

Go to your local hydroponics shop and get a cheap, analog foot-candles light meter. They can be had for <$20 and they will have a scale for HPS lights and a separate scale for CFL lights.

From 2 inches away from the bulb:
my mains powered CFL indicated ~25 foot candles
my imhotep replication indicated ~8-9 foot candles


Others may get better readings but we must be consistant w/ the distances from the bulb. 2 inches was randomly chosen.

YouTube - BEDINI IMHOTEP BODKINS REPLICATION UPDATE3 RADIANT ENERGY TE

Update 4

BEDINI IMHOTEP BODKINS REPLICATION UPDATE4 - APPARATUS FOR THE UTILIZATION OF RADIANT ENERGY TESLA PATENT 685957


Link to boxa888 on youtube
YouTube - Utilization of Radiant Energy 1901 Nikola Tesla,My test 4


YouTube - Utilization of Radiant Energy 1901 Nikola Tesla,my setup 1

Hey, never mind the circuit Philosopher, just look at those fabulous photo's of HT sparks!

I think these must be the ones that bit Ren a few times... Ouch!

~~~
crackahcrackah - thats a great solution for cfl users to compare results with!

Guys i just read a report stating that CFL"s have MERCURY in them,. and the EPA has some guide and procedure to follow if you beak one, sad thing is they end up in landfill!

Also some report that CFL's give off RF Frequencies that make some sick,(not all CFL's are equal) i think the modification would stop the RF? any ways IF YOU BREAK ONE BY ACCIDENT, OPEN ALL THE WINDOWS AND AIR IT OUT AND DON'T BREATH IN. That's about what the EPA states.

Bodkins nice work. I think it would be interesting to have you flip the capacitor, diodes and all, around. Just reverse it. I would like to see if the voltage levels that it maxes out on are different.

that would be too easy Bodkins!!


@Crack got some freetime coming to play.Niceone with the candle meter idea.
@Nat great info brother.Lots to think about.
Note to all my floor has a plastic sheet under it. that ads to what Nat saying.

No problem bodkins!

Just need people to replicate now to confirm findings and to develop further so that we can all benefit from it.

p.s the 2nd ignition coil isnt required. It works without it. Perhaps required later.

Cheers

Nat

Uploading video Nat just playing around no great heaps but it all help to understand the Flow.
We need to get all the info we can on video Nat. There all coming up the rear and if anyone can replicate anythin me you and lid have seen, BINGO
The downside is they dont sleep for a week

Please everone try this it helps
http://www.paths-123.com/products_sh...orld_Team.html

Bodkins

I did some additional research on my x-ray question.
According to Tom Bearden negative electricity discharge
coronas can emit UV, X-Rays and even Gamma Rays.

But don't worry, you won't feel a thing.

YouTube - Bodkins Update 2

I think cracka would find it even more interesting, if he were to try the flipping.

Carl

I second that motion

My next Book
Internet Archive: Details: A history of the theories of aether and electricity : from the age of Descartes to the close of the nineteenth century

Next Setup

Attached Images

Bodkins Bingo.JPG (151.7 KB, 43 views)

Heres the revised circuit that i have been working from

Cheers

Nat

I would if I had the time . My next goal is to use a convergence of methods. Namely, I want to take Imhotep's circuit, remove the portion which controls switching, insert an avalanche pulse width modulator ( <400picoseconds), and use this with the coils. I would expect an even better result via the coupling of an avalanche PWM w/ a toroidal iron powder core inductor (like bob boyce's special toroid) which could then be hooked up to either the car coil or the light bulb directly.

We know that Tesla has said rapid switching was critical so < picosecond PWM's should logically be a step in the right direction. From what I have read it is possible to get a ~2800V/uS slew rate. This rise time rate could be applied to iron powder ferrite core inductors which Zaev N.E. has indicated have a heat conversion to electricity effect when rapidly pulsed. One other guy I'm speaking with is looking into the same thing.

I do believe that this can be applied as an improvement to the current circuitry. And there's only one way to find out...

Cracka

Hi Folks,

I thought i better post a warning. I don't have the knowledge or skills to determine whether this system is generating xrays or any other type of rays. If you build this system you build at your own risk. You may or may not be damaging your health. Owners onus applies.



Nat1971a

!!!!ANYONE WISHING TO REPLICATE YOU DO AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!!!
YouTube - !!!!ANYONE WISHING TO REPLICATE YOU DO AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!!
THANK YOU ALL
Scalar Wave,Negative Resistor,Earth,Wind,Fire?

Attached Images

	CIMG1104.JPG (119.8 KB, 14 views)
	CIMG1103.JPG (158.6 KB, 12 views)

Hi folks, would like to give my results on ignition coil powered cfl's. I am using 555 timer at 4.8khz,50/50 duty, 100micro sec. rise & fall. driving single ign. coil at 12V. routing collapsing field of primary of ign. coil to an 11W Incand. bulb w/ 330uf,200V cap in parallel to bulb. have 3 different cfl's, a 23W, 32W, 13W. the light output of the 23W I would liken to a 25W incand. running at 1/2 brightness or a lil more. and draws 380 milliamps while the 11W incand. bulb at back end is maybe illuminated to 1W or a lil more. however things get interesting as i add the 2nd 32W cfl in series, amp draw drops to 320 milliamps and in my opinion light output is increased to maybe twice. from what i can see each bulb has not diminished in brightness at least i cant detect it with my eyes. when hooking up 3rd smaller bulb also in series light output in basement again is increased. im not sure if this is just spreading out the light better giving the illusion of more light but my eyes cant detect a decrease in each bulbs light intensity and w/ 3rd bulb attached amp draw drops to 280 milliamps. although i think identical bulbs would work better in series like this. Also i did try using a normal car inverter comparing a 60w incand. to 3 in series and in that case yes each is diminished in light output spreading it out through the 3 bulbs but the ignition coil cfl tests are not that way at all. So to me it's looking like if we start with a higher power input to give more real life light outputs then string a bunch of these in series like Bodkins is showing it seems similar to what Joseph Newman is saying, that our input is a catalyst and the copper atoms or in this case the gas and coatings inside the bulb are being converted into light and when using more bulbs or more gas and such we use ever progressively lower inputs and should have more light than we started with at much lower input. And along those lines why wouldn't thick nichrome wire coils in series produce the same heat as one coil would, or more who knows, for lower and lower input. although in this case with these cfl's i would be expecting each light to diminish in light and they don't seem to be, very strange.

Peace, Love, Light

Some questions: What is the values of the capacitor you put between the two diodes to protect the transistor?

What is the resistance values of the induction coil?

What is the actual consumption of the circuit?

Thank you!

SkyWatcher