Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2019 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 12 SEATS AVAILABLE!

2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference
ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 12 SEATS AVAILABLE - LIMITED SEATING
Get your tickets now: http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #91  
Old 05-09-2019, 09:26 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyWatcher View Post
Hi turion, thanks for the tips, wondering how you will trigger what looks like motor coil placements, since the rotor has alternating poles.
That's odd that you can only get 5/16" gap,

Yes, I'm going with the horizontal rotor,
Think about this picture of rotor magnets that you will need then
The outer edge must be machined to keep a constant gap, other wise
you can't work in thousandths of an inch fitting square pegs into
round holes. If this does not help you to understand Turion's
recommendation I can continue. Trust me it will sink in.



You will have to do better than this.See?



Take your time, there is more here than many may think, it will take
effort to hold back long enough to count up all of the needed order for
excellent success. Unless you want to throw it away later and start all
over again. A square magnets around a circle? Hummm...
__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-09-2019 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #92  
Old 05-09-2019, 10:41 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Sky,
The rotor is 7" diameter. I could have probably gotten away with closer tolerances than 5/16, but I have had rotors explode from magnets making contact, and I am scared sh*@less of that happening again. Hence the spacing. I would rather have less power output than lose teeth. My only interest in building this little 3 coil machine in the first place was to use it to demonstrate all the principles. My bigger machine uses the same principles, but it is less easy to demonstrate them, and I still need to wind nine coils for it. I have too much on my plate already. It has vertical rotors with magnets on both sides, and a safety shield that WORKS. It isn’t just winding the 12 strands of wire on each coil that takes up the time, it’s cleaning the coating off the ends of 240 pieces of wire, labeling the beginning and end of each individual wire, and making all those series connections that need to be soldered and shrink wrapped. That is hours and hours of work that I don’t have time for. Today I gave up and called a yard maintenance company to do the yard work at my old house, new house and at my mom’s place. I am too old to remodel two houses and keep up with normal maintenance in addition to doing all that yard work. I did rake up 20 piles of leaves at my old house and I wasn’t 1/10 of the way done.

Dave
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda

Last edited by Turion; 05-10-2019 at 01:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 05-10-2019, 02:27 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Every yardman has seen a magneto on a lawnmower, gokart, tiller,
minibike or a snowblower. This is the correct format. Embedded in the
face of this fan/flywheel/rotor is a horseshoe or arced magnet.

Air gaps are 10-20-30 thousandths depending on the motor

1/16" = 62 thousandths

Properly done the core must be cut in an arc as well, to meet the surface
of the magnets.

__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-10-2019 at 02:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 05-10-2019, 03:05 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,315
Hi bromikey, well that settles it then, I'm making it a vertical rotor, I have built many vertical rotor devices previously, so I'm not too shabby at it.
This way, will be easier to get tighter tolerances.

Hi turion, thanks for sharing.
Yes, even this little test model took some hours, though It was worth it, for what it showed.
peace love light
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 05-10-2019, 09:30 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Hurry up Turion yer gittin old Your first model is about the mechanical
level of the average guy. Tho scary it works.

Good choice Sky we trust your preference. You have all the advantages
by listening to our past blunders. Everybody makes mistakes.

okay here is what is rolling around. Thane use to use those magnets
with holes in them plus the easy shields you can pick up at the time
but the hole makes a mess of the field, strong is not everything.

Thane did a lot of video showing speed up or what he calls his RegenX
coils before we found out he was running 1/4" gaps. Any tighter and
the rotor bearing play and the rotor flex becomes an issue for tolerance.

When Thane finally emerged with his closer gaps he had to use "C" cores
to be practical. Unless you are going to follow Turion where he places
another coil on the other side to balance out the stress.

Vertical rotors need magnets long enough to come out on both sides.
Big bearings, big shaft and quarter inch gaps will permit some runtime
without magnets getting loose.

So when you think about a coil remember it takes two coils for each
magnetic pole.

Also Thanes latest coils are not that big on the "C" cores probably don't
need such big ones with the larger dia rotor on the back end of that
E-Bike plus the tight gaps help. But what I want to say is that he gives
the output of his new coils. He is running 36-48vdc back to the drive
batteries (somewhere there) and intermittently 10amps each but targets
5amps running back to the pack. 10 coil packs gives him 50amps back
to his drive batteries so while recharging is taking place as he drives
the power to drive the back wheel increases with each engaged coil.

So Turion is getting 195w and Thane is getting about the same per coil.
I find that very interesting.

......................................
__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-10-2019 at 09:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 05-10-2019, 03:56 PM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,315
Hi all, Hi bromikey, yes I was looking at thanes more recent stuff, c-core is too difficult and costly, so I will just put coil/cores on both sides of rotor.
I'm going to make it as simple as I can imagine it, similar to that large replication of bedinis free energy device, on that trailer, though without the flywheel and of course, not that big.

Still recovering a bit from being sick, so not going full force at this just yet, though I AM planning it out in my mind, for when my body is ready to rock.
peace love light
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 05-10-2019, 04:17 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
My vertical rotors do NOT need magnets “long enough to come out both sides.” Magnets going all the way through the rotor can be sucked out by the attraction of the iron core no matter how tightly pressed in or epoxied in place. I speak from experience. The whole purpose for building the rotor this way was to have TWO magnets in each position with an extremely thin layer of plastic between them. The two magnets are attracted to each other THROUGH the plastic and hold each other in. Good luck getting them out without destroying the rotor. It is the SAFEST rotor you can build as long as the outside of the magnet is FLUSH with the surface of the rotor. The last rotor that exploded on me had magnets like this that stuck out 1/16 of an inch. I thought that was no big deal. The magnet hit and I found out it IS a big deal. Because my magnets are 3/4 thick you can see that the rotor is just over 1 1/2 inches thick. This makes for an EXTREMELY stable rotor with NO flex or wobble. It also lets you put coils on BOTH sides of the rotor which I see as a POSITIVE rather than a negative. More coils means more generator output.

I have learned my lessons by building many, many, many versions of this machine.

Be careful with the advice you give if you haven’t built a working machine. You will find that many things you THOUGHT would work will not.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 05-10-2019, 08:35 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Options

Sky,
Take a look at this video and get back to me. I can send you any one of these and maybe save you some time. Build at your own risk though. As always.
https://youtu.be/L6pa8FeKo78
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda

Last edited by Turion; 05-10-2019 at 08:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 05-10-2019, 09:30 PM
viomarmi22 viomarmi22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2
I bought 40 pieces. of this type of neodymium magnets for the construction of a rotor with halbach array.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/2-pc...34934c4dlqeYUy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 250mm_prototype_text__20881.jpg (36.8 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg 250mm_prototype_2_text__31648.jpg (45.7 KB, 14 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 05-10-2019, 10:26 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
My vertical rotors do NOT need magnets
“long enough to come out both sides.” ..........

Be careful with the advice you give if you haven’t built a working
machine.
Common sense teaches that to properly build a rotor with magnets
shielding / holders, magnet holders MUST be used. I have spoken till
I am blue in the face about common sense/practical mechanical.

I will hold back no punches. THANE HEINZ? Do you acknowledge his
work? Do you see his rotors? Do you read patents concerning power
generation for marine installations? We if you did like I am seeing
you would know that shielding / holders limit the magnetic field from
one pole overlapping the next pole.

Do I need to draw a picture of a rotor with magnets on it doing a
field visual of overlapping magnetism? Do I? You know me, I will.

I am discussing refinement and practical applications not proof of
concept. I want it to run so it does not tear itself to ribbons or burn
up with heat.

Magnets having shielding / holders are mounted with special press fit
rubberized epoxy formulas. The holder centralizes the magnet inside.

In other words my magnets on my bench for my project show that the
shielding/covers/holder keep the magnet from coming out, they are held
by the field itself. The magnet keeps itself to a degree.

Yes I have it on my bench and no I am not talking speculation. It might
help if your read my posts in your busy day. Anyway I am warned now
about giving advice.

Another thing (MY OPINION) you run 3000rpm's using plastic rotors you
are going to be killed eventually or kill someone with a magnet. This is
not a game of who is better this is about common sense staying in
one piece.

Okay lets take it from the top.

#1 All commercially grown rotors use some form of a metallic substance
to ensure structural integrity for tolerance

#2 Magnets not only need holders to help retain their position but
the same is a magnetic shield limiting magnetic interference. Shields
push the field out front where the core is not permitting the field to
reach over several inches to the adjacent pole not intended to be
engaged.

I have stressed this before, common mechanical sense, probably way
over the heads of those not considering. Look at Thane Heinz rotors.

Reject my offering go ahead, to your own peril.

Now does anyone what a suggestion how to hold magnets more tightly?
I guess not.



Many other pictures of this rotor are on this site put here by one of
Thanes past machinists. These many pictures show shielding cylinders
around the magnets.

I have shields and I use metal rotor, I have them here on my bench.
Yes they work just as well as plastic. I have plastic rotors on my bench.

So my experience is what i am speaking about. Personally I think you
have to be crazy to run a plastic rotor up to 3000rpm - 4000rpm
Insane.

Plastic cracks, plastic can not stand the pounding, plastic can not
take the vibration. Plastic is a joke and unsuitable for long term
practical use in high quality machines.

The shielding eliminates the problems where a metal rotor bleeds of flux.

No commercially available electric car motors use plastic rotors and
rightfully so. Electric motor engineering is not totally without merit.

Thank you for your time. You better listen to me.
__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-10-2019 at 10:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 05-10-2019, 11:41 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Rotors

Some of what you said I agree with and some I do not. When two North magnets are put on a rotor the two fields don’t “overlap.” A “virtual south” is created between the two. Now shields MAY focus the power, but I would rather add length to my magnet which gives me more production. A thicker rotor with longer magnets.

Anything held in with epoxy is asking for trouble under stress. Period.

I agree that rotor material needs to be aluminum, but that is for a commercial build. For now I will stick with what I’ve got. Some of the new materials are almost as strong, and THAT is what my new rotors are made of. For experimenting it will have to do. If I intended to build a generator like this to power my home, I would ABSOLUTELY spend the money on aluminum rotors and high speed bearings. But I don’t.

I have other projects.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 05-11-2019, 02:52 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
When two North magnets are put on a rotor the
two fields don’t “overlap.” A “virtual south” is created between the two.
You are right, forgot that one and have little knowledge. All north's?
Okay. I'll have to think about that a while.

The thing about the shields is that counterbalancing magnets and rotor
magnet might reach over a 3" span while magnet to core interact at close proximity say 1" range and even closer if shields are used.. In order to
lower the drive input magnets to magnets and magnets to core material
must be equal, easy to say and hard to do.

Controlling stray fields is done with shielding even with all north's you
want separation and the virtual south should still be there.

If you have many magnets around a rotor LIKE THANE DOES you have
magnets that are as close as 1/4" apart, without a shield your rotor
will fail. Thanks for being so understanding.

I thought aluminum was bad? Well I heard that on youtube where
someone showed that it just didn't work. Do you have any aluminum
rotors yet?

You need help to perfect your system, too bad everyone has jumped
ship and the burden now falls on you. Everyone is weak in one area or
the other so we need to work together. Where is the help?


__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 05-11-2019, 02:58 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,315
Hi turion, thanks for the offer and sharing the video, though I need to build this myself, so I can learn more and gain more experience.

I think I will design the rotor like the single plastic one you showed, with the material left between the 2 magnets, so they help keep each other in.

Also, could always put a thin, but strong enough lexan laminate over the entire side of each rotor and secure with screws, to help retain the magnets.

Yes, I realize, especially now that I've started recovering my epoxied neo magnets from a previous rotor project, how brittle epoxy is and under stress, not a good idea.

Good thing those magnet stacks were attached to a ferromagnetic rod, or they probably would have let loose.

So I'm thankful you guys are pointing these things out.
peace love light
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 05-11-2019, 03:21 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
So everyone understands, I am not talking about sticking a magnet
on the side of a pop bottle with epoxy. Look at how it's done
mechanically first and know that the epoxy does very little yet it is
there. Not just any type you decide to try, it is special stuff, use it.

Keep in mind these rotor run 5000-6000rpms, the big pic is a for a
motorcycle generator. Press fit epoxied but that doesn't mean the
epoxy is the only thing holding it. The magnet holds itself in also.

https://thumpertalk.com/uploads/monthly_03_2016/post-463607-0-82547500-1457076285.jpg

https://thumpertalk.com/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i1376.photobucket.com/albums/ah12/gsuarezlecuona/Husqvarna%2520TE610e%25201998/IMG_20150408_193936_zpsum8imq1a.jpg&key=5b6b3727f9 b118f8dfe6ba14db2d17e6e101d45a59b918f16777a0e4323e 11db




__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-11-2019 at 03:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 05-11-2019, 03:38 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Here are a few more examples. Think about it? Eventually you will
understand why that this is the way it is done in factories today.

Generator rotors with strong magnets. Old news.




Yamaha



https://x.cloudsdata.net/6f/images/products/large/5c6c2208ca2ec_IMG20190219163154.jpg

Buy one already made

https://unitedexpressdist.3dcartstores.com/150cc-125cc-Scooter-Moped-Magneto-Flywheel-Stator-GY6-8-Magnet-152QMI_p_2105.html

God awful vibration and super RPM's epoxied magnets.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6HBBQWjT0Os/maxresdefault.jpg
__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-11-2019 at 03:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 05-11-2019, 06:29 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Coils

The whole purpose of this thread was to discuss the kind of coils that ALLOW you to run your generator at NZuCH LOWER rpm and STILL produce max power. I KNOW the “effect” is caused by the passage of a single magnet and has nothing to do with the distance between magnets or the time it takes to go from one magnet to the next.

So here are some of the things I have looked at. If you have a one inch diameter magnet it takes a specific amount of time to pass the coil core at a given rpm. But what if the magnet is 1/4 wide by 1” high and much LONGER so the mass of the magnet is the same or GREATER than a 1” diameter by 3/4 thick magnet? How does this affect the generator coils output and the rpm st which it speeds up under load. I’ll give you a hint. It speeds up at a LOWER rpm. I would not be surprised to see that we could get the rpm down around 1,000 and the sane volts andanps out of a coil.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 05-11-2019, 08:10 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
The whole purpose of this thread was to
discuss the kind of coils that ALLOW you to run your generator

If you have a one inch diameter magnet it takes a specific amount of
time to pass the coil core at a given rpm. But what if the magnet is
1/4 wide by 1”

I’ll give you a hint. It speeds up at a LOWER rpm. I would not be
surprised to see that we could get the rpm down around 1,000 and
the sane volts and amps out of a coil.
Does the core size stay the same in this quiz? Say a 3/4" core used for
both magnets? If I knew that then I could look more at duration.

Note: it took you 10 yrs to develop this work, in another 10 maybe you
will have a new tech. Be realistic plz

__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-11-2019 at 08:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 05-11-2019, 11:53 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Core

Yes, core size stays the same. As to new tech. It already exists.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 05-12-2019, 12:44 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,315
Hi bromikey, thanks for sharing the information.

Hi turion, thanks for sharing.
I see what you mean, the narrow magnet would reach the center of the core (TDC) ,much quicker for the same rpm, or I mean it has less distance to travel to TDC once the core interaction starts.
Of course, that would not give a good power sweep of the coil, without the magnet height, then again, with a bumped out core, it might not matter as much.
Sounds like you've built it and tested it, would like to see pics of that.
I don't have any small diameter neo's on hand, just the 1" diameter, though I could get 5/16" or 7/16" diameter disc neo's.
peace love light

Edit: Also, I created this thread for experiments, to see if I could get the true effect and I have.
Not for how low can we go, that was bromikey's ideas, which are fine.
Now I would like to try and make some useful juice and keep the rpm's lower if possible.
__________________
 

Last edited by SkyWatcher; 05-12-2019 at 12:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 05-12-2019, 03:15 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Magnets

Got a rotor on the drawing board soon to be built with magnets 1/4 wide by 3/4 high (the height of the core) and 2” long, magnetized through the length. It is one of several things I am trying for thus small prototype to see the effect on output. Would also like to try 1/4 wide by 3” high by 2” long magnetized through the length, to compare sweeping the entire coil (3” high) with the magnet vs just sweeping the core. (3/4” high). Magnets are on order. Working on getting the rotor made. I did test something similar, but this will be quite specific.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 05-12-2019, 03:33 AM
Pot head's Avatar
Pot head Pot head is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Nunya
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyWatcher View Post
Hi bromikey, thanks for sharing the information.

Hi turion, thanks for sharing.
I see what you mean, the narrow magnet would reach the center of the core (TDC) ,much quicker for the same rpm, or I mean it has less distance to travel to TDC once the core interaction starts.
Of course, that would not give a good power sweep of the coil, without the magnet height, then again, with a bumped out core, it might not matter as much.
Sounds like you've built it and tested it, would like to see pics of that.
I don't have any small diameter neo's on hand, just the 1" diameter, though I could get 5/16" or 7/16" diameter disc neo's.
peace love light

Edit: Also, I created this thread for experiments, to see if I could get the true effect and I have.
Not for how low can we go, that was bromikey's ideas, which are fine.
Now I would like to try and make some useful juice and keep the rpm's lower if possible.
John Bedini wrote the bigger the build the better and the slower it needs to move, unlike smaller versions.
__________________
I have been to another planet. It’s called My Family.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 05-12-2019, 06:17 AM
Netica's Avatar
Netica Netica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 153
Hi Turion,

Its good to read the info you post to help people, thanks for all your help.

From what I can learn your rotors have all the same poles on each side of the rotor. I am just wondering if you have ever tried to run north, south, north, south, on the same side as well. And if you tried it, if you found any difference in the way the generator would run.

I was wondering if you chose all magnet poles being the same on each side of the rotor for any particular reason?

Thanks
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 05-12-2019, 07:44 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Netica View Post
Hi Turion,


I was wondering if you chose all magnet poles being the same on
each side of the rotor for any particular reason?

Thanks
Yes I can answer that. To use a counter balancing magnet on the
opposite side from the coil from the rotor they must all be one way
(north in this case) to do it.

Turion has told us this for years, but it's okay, I'll help out on repeats
if that is okay?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 05-12-2019, 02:38 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
N/S

The machine I recommended (which I have also built and am putting back together at this time) is all N magnets out on the rotor. For EXACTLY the reason Bro Mikey talks about. When you are using a horizontal rotor with magnets on the rotor edge, when a magnet is aligned in attraction with a coil, the magnet directly across from it is aligned with an adjustable magnet on the stator. They cancel each other out. In a vertical rotor, that's magnets on the face of the rotor instead of the edge (so it can have a coil on each side of the rotor) wen the magnet is aligned with the two coils, the magnet opposite it on the rotor is aligned BETWEEN two adjustable magnets that match the face of the magnet aligned to them in repulsion. It will not put out as much as my big machine because it is only 10 coil instead of 12 and does not have as many magnets on the rotor, nor are they as thick. But when I get it back up and running it will STILL prove my point. I know some people are going to whine because it doesn’t put out 2,000 watts, but let them. It is also WAY less expensive to build than my big machine for a number of reasons. Size, number of magnets, etc. So it is THIS machine I have chosen to share for replication.

My BIG machine has N/S magnets on the rotors and 12 coils. But the rotor is larger in diameter by 3 inches and has a second set of magnets out closer to the rim. Each time one of the primary magnets centers between two coils in attraction to both, these secondary magnets center between two magnets on the stator in repulsion. The N side of the magnet is aligned with an N magnet on the stator and the S side of the magnet is aligned with an S magnet on the stator. The stator magnets are adjustable on the big machine just like on the small machine, but I made MISTAKES building the big machine that I corrected when I built the smaller one. The big machine used square magnets that rode in square plastic tubing and the little magnet holder that was adjusted in and out was complex and did not work well. I went to round magnets in pvc pipe for the small machine and that eliminated the magnet holder complexity. Live and learn. It was also CHEAPER, which is always good.

At speed I see no difference in INDIVIDUAL coil output between the two machines, but the number of magnets on the rotor makes a difference as does the thickness of the rotor magnets. One just has more coils and stronger magnets. It USED to have weaker magnets and that is when I compared the output of the coils. Right now, the bigger machine definitely gets MORE out of the coils.

Which brings me to another thought. At SOME point the core is absorbing all the flux it can accept, so the coil will put out NO MORE electricity no matter HOW big or thick the magnets are. I don't know what that point IS.

as a side note: I have an entire box that is probably 18 inches square built out of 1 x 6's holding all of the different rotors I have tried on these machines to get the one I believe outputs the most for the situation. They each have a piece of 3/4 plywood between them so that I can get them apart because the all want to stick together. Some of them are only 1/4 inch thick with a single magnet pressed in, and some have magnets pressed in from both sides. Some are missing some of the magnets because they got pulled out for the NEXT rotor. I would be happy to send ANYONE one of my old rotors so they can experiment if they are willing to pay the cost of shipping up front. I am really tired of people promising me they would pay for shipping and then they get what I sent them for FREE and never paid my shipping costs. I can't tell you HOW many times that has happened, and I don't mind giving stuff away for free or I wouldn't OFFER it, but it is the principal of the thing when people make promises they don't keep.
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda

Last edited by Turion; 05-12-2019 at 03:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 05-12-2019, 05:01 PM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,315
Hi all, thanks for sharing the good information.
It's time to fire up the cad software and start working on a design.
peace love light
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 05-12-2019, 05:18 PM
alexelectric alexelectric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
The machine I recommended (which I have also built and am putting back together at this time) is all N magnets out on the rotor. For EXACTLY the reason Bro Mikey talks about. When you are using a horizontal rotor with magnets on the rotor edge, when a magnet is aligned in attraction with a coil, the magnet directly across from it is aligned with an adjustable magnet on the stator. They cancel each other out. In a vertical rotor, that's magnets on the face of the rotor instead of the edge (so it can have a coil on each side of the rotor) wen the magnet is aligned with the two coils, the magnet opposite it on the rotor is aligned BETWEEN two adjustable magnets that match the face of the magnet aligned to them in repulsion. It will not put out as much as my big machine because it is only 10 coil instead of 12 and does not have as many magnets on the rotor, nor are they as thick. But when I get it back up and running it will STILL prove my point. I know some people are going to whine because it doesn’t put out 2,000 watts, but let them. It is also WAY less expensive to build than my big machine for a number of reasons. Size, number of magnets, etc. So it is THIS machine I have chosen to share for replication.

My BIG machine has N/S magnets on the rotors and 12 coils. But the rotor is larger in diameter by 3 inches and has a second set of magnets out closer to the rim. Each time one of the primary magnets centers between two coils in attraction to both, these secondary magnets center between two magnets on the stator in repulsion. The N side of the magnet is aligned with an N magnet on the stator and the S side of the magnet is aligned with an S magnet on the stator. The stator magnets are adjustable on the big machine just like on the small machine, but I made MISTAKES building the big machine that I corrected when I built the smaller one. The big machine used square magnets that rode in square plastic tubing and the little magnet holder that was adjusted in and out was complex and did not work well. I went to round magnets in pvc pipe for the small machine and that eliminated the magnet holder complexity. Live and learn. It was also CHEAPER, which is always good.

At speed I see no difference in INDIVIDUAL coil output between the two machines, but the number of magnets on the rotor makes a difference as does the thickness of the rotor magnets. One just has more coils and stronger magnets. It USED to have weaker magnets and that is when I compared the output of the coils. Right now, the bigger machine definitely gets MORE out of the coils.

Which brings me to another thought. At SOME point the core is absorbing all the flux it can accept, so the coil will put out NO MORE electricity no matter HOW big or thick the magnets are. I don't know what that point IS.

as a side note: I have an entire box that is probably 18 inches square built out of 1 x 6's holding all of the different rotors I have tried on these machines to get the one I believe outputs the most for the situation. They each have a piece of 3/4 plywood between them so that I can get them apart because the all want to stick together. Some of them are only 1/4 inch thick with a single magnet pressed in, and some have magnets pressed in from both sides. Some are missing some of the magnets because they got pulled out for the NEXT rotor. I would be happy to send ANYONE one of my old rotors so they can experiment if they are willing to pay the cost of shipping up front. I am really tired of people promising me they would pay for shipping and then they get what I sent them for FREE and never paid my shipping costs. I can't tell you HOW many times that has happened, and I don't mind giving stuff away for free or I wouldn't OFFER it, but it is the principal of the thing when people make promises they don't keep.
very good information, all the help of this experienced user is appreciated.
a very kind request, can through schemes show what you say, to have more clarity than what was commented, read and read and some things I do not understand, with all respect for your knowledge,
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 05-12-2019, 07:16 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,748
Video explanation

https://youtu.be/VM2POv6D4Zc
https://youtu.be/AkECEEj6Yuo
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 05-12-2019, 07:30 PM
alexelectric alexelectric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 35
thanks for your help Turion
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 05-12-2019, 09:41 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
.

My BIG machine has N/S magnets on the rotors and 12 coils. But the rotor is larger in diameter by 3 inches and has a second set of magnets out closer to the rim. Each time one of the primary magnets centers between two coils in attraction to both, these secondary magnets center between two magnets on the stator in repulsion. The N side of the magnet is aligned with an N magnet on the stator and the S side of the magnet is aligned with an S magnet on the stator. The stator magnets are adjustable on the big machine just like on the small machine, but I made MISTAKES...................... .
Awesome Dave, dang, why didn't i think of that
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 05-12-2019, 09:55 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
It is nearly impossible to show a rotor that does not cog. What I am
seeing in your videos is that the project is nothing like I envisioned
from the many posts.

video's say it all. No balanced or non cogging rotor I was actually
hoping to see a free wheeling rotor in your set up, yet each time
this is not shown due to problems? Half assembled?

Hum...... Dang I wished I could see that machine with zero cog.

Hard to do.

One thing important for those trying to use the counterbalancing
magnets, use a smaller magnet than the rotor magnet. Distance can
not solve all the problems with balancing.

It is possible I know because I am getting closer.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
coil, lenz, diameter, multifilar, strands, pieces, rotor, base, magnets, piece, delay, thread, wire, transmitter, hooked, reciever, airplane, quiter, smoother, brushless, motor, size, drive, placing, questions

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers