Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Sponsored by Teslacoin Foundation

Teslacoin Foundation

https://www.teslastarter.org


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-22-2018, 12:39 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Smile Can a Mag Amp Produce Unlimited Gain from 1 Micro VDC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
As these three YouTube videos relate to ED's work, and as it has been much discussed here, I thought they might be of interest.
YouTube - Transformer core tests part 1
YouTube - Transformer core tests part 2
YouTube - Homemade magnetic amplifiers made from common materials.
I posed a question to Nyle Steiner at his YouTube video. Here it is...

Quote:
What do you think would be the result if three capacitors were added to your duo-diode schematic?

http://is.gd/yoxizi
http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/mag-amp...-diodes-50.gif

...and a load coil was added with a counter-winding to neutralize voltage, but preserve the amperage?...

http://is.gd/ivolun
https://ia800102.us.archive.org/14/i...ating_java.jpg

http://is.gd/emadad
https://ia800102.us.archive.org/14/i...ising_java.jpg

http://is.gd/novoltage

http://is.gd/novoltagecmf

http://is.gd/novoltagecmf2
https://archive.org/download/pc-sim-...no-voltage.cmf

...based on this...
http://is.gd/mag_amp
http://is.gd/magamp2
https://archive.org/download/pc-sim-...si/mag-amp.txt

...and these...
http://is.gd/acmotorctt
http://is.gd/acmotorctt2
https://archive.org/download/pc-sim-...-motor-ctt.txt

http://is.gd/acmotorcttcmf
http://is.gd/acmotorcttcmf2
https://archive.org/download/pc-sim-...-motor-ctt.cmf

CMF files are simulated in...
https://sourceforge.net/projects/circuitmod/
...with Java installed in the computer...
http://java.com/

Do you think these simulations would produce buildable results?

More dialogue...
Can a Mag Amp Produce Unlimited Gain from 1 Micro VDC?
BTW, the attached text files simulate in any one of the following locations...
http://vinyasi.info/ne
http://falstad.com/circuit/
http://lushprojects.com/circuitjs/

Or this downloadable zip file on a PC...
pc-sim-falstad-vinyasi.zip
http://is.gd/electsim
http://is.gd/elektsim
https://archive.org/download/pc-sim-...ad-vinyasi.zip

PS-
The addition of the two 1pF capacitors stimulate Eric Dollard's analog computer in LMD mode while the right-most capacitor of 100pF regulates both the frequency, resistance/impedance, and gain of power across the counter-wound pair of load coils beside it. The battery must be cut off immediately after startup or else it will drag the gain preventing it from occurring. The aerial could have been used as a reference from the beginning and throughout the simulation in place of the battery's initial contribution, but I liked the influence of using the ground at startup for its initial reference is unique apart from the aerial's referencing influence - so I kept the battery for its momentary contribution.

I say 'reference', since I do not believe any energy comes from either the ground nor the air despite all appearances and our common belief system.

It is a little known secret that all 'free' energy comes out of the multiplication of waves. Eric's use of capacitance interacting with inductance is a guarantee of wave manufacture. All I do is make sure the coils I simulate for wave multiplication have magnetizable cores (not air cores) often times with moderately low inductance (100 nano Henrys or less) and the capacitors are likewise between 1 to 10 pF. This insures that these two sets of components quickly reach saturation and react as Eric says they will: the energy entering/absorbed by the capacitors is not the same energy as that which comes back out. That emission is from counter-space using (I suspect) the capacitor's dielectric as a portal negotiating between space and its counterpart. I'm left to imagine that a similar situation is occurring among a pair of low level inductors negotiating a magnetic interchange, an interaction, between space and counter-space. Since energy is composed of more than merely information (its waveform), the energy needed to incarnate (flesh out) waves comes out of the materials of a circuit's construction. That is why too much gain melts, or explodes, a circuit's components resulting in its self-destruction. And this is why energy is theoretically limitless within the boundaries of a circuit's tolerance to support it.

PPS-
Eric Dollard's LMD is a self-saturating module. That's why it comes as a pair of inductors coupled with a pair of capacitors: each saturates its duplicate component. This saturation makes overunity possible since what goes into a component does not equal what comes out provided all amperage references (what we normally call 'sources') have access to unlimited variability, such as: the Earth or an aerial.

Thus, all I had to do was add a pair of low level capacitors to Nyle Steiner's Homemade Mag Amp schematic (with the dual diodes), and a few other mods to create an equivalence of Eric's LMD, because the principle of mutual saturation was already built into both circuit concepts.

Eric Dollard's LMD Analog Computer is the Mutual Saturation of Capacitance and Magnetism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCrRkfU1jKo
(I particularly enjoyed BMan18's comment pinned to the top)

More dialogue...
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...31/TOWtoHHyaXA
Attached Files
File Type: txt mag-amp.txt (1.2 KB, 14 views)
File Type: txt ac-motor.txt (1.9 KB, 6 views)
File Type: txt no-voltage.txt (3.0 KB, 3 views)
File Type: txt ac-motor-ctt.txt (1.7 KB, 5 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 03-22-2018 at 02:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 03-22-2018, 01:47 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,820
Eric Dollard's Magamp

Hi Vinyasi,

Have you ever looked into Eric Dollard's magamp design posted in his thread? Polakowski built a crude version of it in the past and it had promising results. I have all the parts here, but haven't had time to assemble it.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2018, 07:14 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
My response to Ken Wheeler

5:22
I have to disagree. Partially, at least.

The increased number of raised nails are reshaping the extension of the magnet's field to make it more intense. Less raised nails would be a weaker extension. Since magnetism cannot be barred with the use of any kind of barrier, the only thing left remaining which can be done is to extend a magnetic field through magnetizable material. Your examples of ferrous fluid exhibits this property. This increased intensity is stronger at repelling surrounding nails causing a widening ring of non-raised nails. That's all. Nothing else. No dielectricity is being invoked unless equivalent to this explanation as well. The reason you have to use greater force to shake more nails towards the magnet is due to the formation of a ring of repulsion surrounding whatever quantity of nails are shook towards the magnet. The greater the number of nails results in a greater field of repulsion surrounding those nails. This is similar to osmotic pressure. The greater number of ions absorbed results in less osmotic force of absorption - a form of negative feedback.

In other words, despite our obsession with magnetic poles as if that's all what magnetism is about, there appears to be another force opposite to magnetism which does not align itself with the Bosch wall, but with the whole exterior space surrounding magnetizable objects at right angles to their poles. If this is the dielectric field of a magnet, then so be it. But this is a result of magnetism and in no way interferes with it. Instead, this other force is at the mercy of magnetism. Magnetism is dictating its own world. Nothing else is interfering. In fact, I will go further in speculating that if some other force exists apart from magnetism, then this other force can only be noticed if magnetism steps aside. Otherwise, the heavy-handedness of magnetism obliterates all appearance of this other force's presence.

Remember what Eric Dollard says about two of the three elements making up the synthesis of electricity, namely the two forces of: dielectricity and magnetism (the third element being time) -- each force exists only in complete denial of the other force.

Also recall Eric's experiments with the space between two true Tesla coils (the ones with spacings between a singularly layered winding held on an armature) in which Eric made a galaxy appear in burnt out street lights. This space was a null zone in which the electromagnetic influence of his two coils canceled each other out. That's where the dielectric appeared.

As an aside...
This explains our use of counter-wound coils: to neutralize the average of the magnetic field of a coil, its dielectric field, by neutralizing its polarity of voltage and thus isolate the coil's net behavior to that of the magnetic/amperage/current quality, only.

But dielectricity may not have any say so in this since all that is required is to cancel the externalization of magnetic poles in order to cancel voltage polarity and still have current traveling in one direction at a time along each of its respective pathways...
Circuit Simulator Applet ported to JavaScript by Iain Sharp, from the original in Java by Paul Falstad, Used Here to Promote the Simulation of Surges Arising from the Judicious Use of Negative Resistance.

Current is always isolated to a single track of passage while voltage is a field extending outside a track. So, voltage polarity gets canceled with counter-wound coils while current is preserved within the confines of each track.

Conclusion...
Dielectricity can only be inferred since it appears as a statistical result of a magnetizing current.
Magnetism can be measured since it appears in the same manner as current in a wire appears.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2018, 11:21 AM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
counter space energy, dielectricity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdPQwe6gA0Q

whenever someone tries to explain energy from counter space, this scenario is what comes into my mind.. and the counter space is the area where antman stopped shrinking.. sometimes its so great it appears as if I'm studying a fantasy..
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2018, 09:24 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Is this what you mean?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
Hi Vinyasi,

Have you ever looked into Eric Dollard's magamp design posted in his thread? Polakowski built a crude version of it in the past and it had promising results. I have all the parts here, but haven't had time to assemble it.
I had a hard time finding Eric's schematic. This was the closest I came to...
http://www.energeticforum.com/201435-post20.html
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2018, 09:29 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Correct...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdPQwe6gA0Q

whenever someone tries to explain energy from counter space, this scenario is what comes into my mind.. and the counter space is the area where antman stopped shrinking.. sometimes its so great it appears as if I'm studying a fantasy..
Executing a circuit and theorizing why the circuit does whatever it does are vastly two distinct actions. The former is precise. The latter has innumerable variations /including physics/ - none of which deters the former. Consider the latter as light entertainment loosely based on the former and take another swig of V8. Ah! Feel better?

I never heard of curiosity fed imagination being considered one of the deadly sins of religious morals, but I could be wrong here...

As an aside...
I certainly don't need a green card to perform heretical physics. If a circuit violates the laws of physics, then maybe physics is unconstitutional? Immoral? And irreligious? Ultimately, in denial of the self.

None of which matters to me. My only concern is where does reality fall short of my simulations or where does the simulator's theoretical electronics fall short of reality whenever simulating Eric's theme of a dual capacitor coupled to a dual inductor, mutually saturated, unstable LMD analog computer module if none of these simulations can be built?

Nice video, btw.
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 03-23-2018 at 09:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-24-2018, 01:58 AM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
Executing a circuit and theorizing why the circuit does whatever it does are vastly two distinct actions. The former is precise. The latter has innumerable variations /including physics/ - none of which deters the former. Consider the latter as light entertainment loosely based on the former and take another swig of V8. Ah! Feel better?

I never heard of curiosity fed imagination being considered one of the deadly sins of religious morals, but I could be wrong here...

As an aside...
I certainly don't need a green card to perform heretical physics. If a circuit violates the laws of physics, then maybe physics is unconstitutional? Immoral? And irreligious? Ultimately, in denial of the self.

None of which matters to me. My only concern is where does reality fall short of my simulations or where does the simulator's theoretical electronics fall short of reality whenever simulating Eric's theme of a dual capacitor coupled to a dual inductor, mutually saturated, unstable LMD analog computer module if none of these simulations can be built?

Nice video, btw.
sometimes maybe I like to think in terms of coming up a better explanation of this "Dielectric force".. i mean It's there alright and the most logical explanation of its source was from the infinity inside, since It pulls things together.. like some black hole or some sort.. not to the point of getting into another dimension like explanation.. something that makes much more sense.. but who can think in terms of infinity huh?.. ..
our minds are limited as they are and somehow we like to think to limit things so that we can understand things.. so thus we create concepts like "Counter Space" or "Other dimensions"... just to make a point of reference.. to answer our own question "where"...

but what if.. just what if.. the energy is not really from the "Counter Space" or other dimension.. what if It's just from the ambient surrounding?.. just from the air around the capacitor...

let me reword that..

what if.. its all just like "Temperature" when you evacuate the "Electric temperature" of the capacitor, the ambient background will pour some of its temperature into that capacitor, so that when you put back the temperature that you have evacuated, it's more than it was before..

your statement reminds me of the book "Occult Ether Physics"..

but back on topic, I don't think you can get "Unlimited Gains" there's a certain limit on which everything will balance, IMO that's what the nature has been doing from the start, and always have been, to balance things..
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-24-2018, 08:16 AM
mikrovolt mikrovolt is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 785
We talk about the higgs field we can trap an electron by a proton.
Looking at magnets we can describe the energy as a local source
and we describe a source called higgs that is turned on everywhere.
Higgs field gives the electron mass.
We do not understand what dark matter is.
The gravitational lensing allows us to approximate a simulation. as shown

https://youtu.be/-4Mz4OGVC_U?t=3114
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-25-2018, 10:52 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
This is a lively discussion...

..over at DIY Electric Car forum on magamps used for overunity gain...
magnetic amplifier to boost performance - DIY Electric Car Forums
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-25-2018, 11:43 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
OK, but...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
sometimes maybe I like to think in terms of coming up a better explanation of this "Dielectric force".. i mean It's there alright and the most logical explanation of its source was from the infinity inside, since It pulls things together.. like some black hole or some sort.. not to the point of getting into another dimension like explanation.. something that makes much more sense.. but who can think in terms of infinity huh?.. ..
our minds are limited as they are and somehow we like to think to limit things so that we can understand things.. so thus we create concepts like "Counter Space" or "Other dimensions"... just to make a point of reference.. to answer our own question "where"...

but what if.. just what if.. the energy is not really from the "Counter Space" or other dimension.. what if It's just from the ambient surrounding?.. just from the air around the capacitor...

let me reword that..

what if.. its all just like "Temperature" when you evacuate the "Electric temperature" of the capacitor, the ambient background will pour some of its temperature into that capacitor, so that when you put back the temperature that you have evacuated, it's more than it was before..

your statement reminds me of the book "Occult Ether Physics"..

but back on topic, I don't think you can get "Unlimited Gains" there's a certain limit on which everything will balance, IMO that's what the nature has been doing from the start, and always have been, to balance things..
Infinity is not intangible.
The early days of computers were dealing with negative zero, but couldn't deal with it in an honest way. They had to hide it by performing two's compliment arithmetic at the terminus of an operation so as to not result in a negative zero whenever a quantity was subtracted from itself.

Anyone who's studied the I Ching, Chinese Book of Changes, knows that anything taken to its extreme flips, inverts, into its opposite. So, magnitude may seem intangible, but polarity is not.

But from the perspective of a computer's register (the thingy holding onto all those one's and zero's), the limit of that register (be it a 16 bit register, or a 32 bit register, or whatever number of digits base two it can hold) is - for all intents and purposes - infinity. But the catch, in this system, is there are two infinities.

Who has ever quantified zero, anyway?

That's looking at it from the perspective of the individual digits, base two. But from the standpoint of the entire register, regardless of its size, there's only two numbers which exist in the entire universe in base two. That is: zero and infinity.

Now, this is not useless philosophy. This has practical benefits. See if you can use this line of logic to partially, or completely if you're more fortunate than I, define division of any real number by zero. Now, can you do it? Any more readily than before this discussion?

I can. I can define it (if my memory serves me) for one case out of four possible cases, partially define it in two, and not in the fourth case. What do you think these four cases are? Do they satisfy all possibilities?

Although the I Ching, and the Tao for that matter, delineates these two extremes as Yang and Yin, the Vedas go one step further by making this into a trilogy: Sat-Chit-Ananda: Energy, Intelligence, Bliss. Yang and Yin are defined quite well by two of the eight trigrams of the I Ching: Chien (three solid line trigram) for Creative Fullness of Energy and K'un for Voidness of Intelligent (three broken line trigram).

I think that it is the Brahma Sutras of the Vedas which proclaim: "Two fullnesses: fullness of fullness and fullness of emptiness...." [Purnamida; purnamidam] "...Take fullness from fullness and fullness remains."

Would it be too far a stretch of the imagination to suppose that the aether may be more than merely the numeric equivalence of the complex number field quantifying counter-space as Eric describes?

What if it's an unlimited void, or fullness, of energy which is non-quantifiable in that realm/state of its existence? What if it can only be measured by real numbers out here in physicality due to infinity having been split off into multiple physical infinities which we count, ie measure, as definitive quantities of infinite identities? Kind of makes ya think, uh?

This may be analogous to the study of infinite sets denoted by aleph sub zero, aleph sub one, etc.? I don't know. But it sounds similar....

How much Aether is in your Coffee?

If a mind can meditate, transcend the physical world of the senses, and experience Sat-Chit-Ananda at its fundamental source beyond this trilogy, then infinity (or Friedrich Nietzsche's existentialist void) is not beyond the mind's experience. It's merely beyond the mind's grasp as a concept on par with everything else we take to be the exclusive domain of the mind, namely: quantifiable by our senses.

I think Eric is doing a superb job of quantifying the intangible. It sounds voodoo-ish, but who cares? Charlie Lutes always used to say that scientists of the future will become more like priests and priests will become more like scientists. Go figure?

Unlimited gains are the infinite potential realm which the simulator suggests due to my interpretation of trends. A circuit trending upwards in gain with no terminus in sight, accelerating logarithmically as Eric says they do when exhibiting the behavior of an impulse current, is an unlimited gain in my opinion. Why? Because the simulator has an arbitrary limit set at 10 raised to the power of +/- 48 (again, if my memory serves me last time I checked Paul Falstad's electronic simulator).

And BTW, I think the LMD module of Eric performs at least one function which I can recognize: that of magnifying a trend. So, if a trending circuit is gaining, then that's what it will continue to do ad infinitum. But if the circuit is trending towards null, balance, or zero mid-line on the oscilloscope tracing, then the LMD will lock in that trend until its limit is reached or its asymptote is approached from which an infinite limit may be suggestive.

Out of all this talk of infinity, I think what Eric is doing with the concepts of counter-space and complex numbers is quantifying the engineerable amounts of magnetic catalyst entering into a coil or the dielectric catalyst entering into a capacitor's dielectric to stimulate a fixed, but partly non-predictable, quantity of these two basic energies springing out of these two fundamental electronic components to synthesize electricity under certain conditions outside of their commonly understood functions to merely: "give OUT whatever they take IN" minus thermodynamic losses, etc. Thus, they possess two practical functions: one unconventional and the latter very conventional.

Oh, and by another way, one limit - or balance - of Nature is the tolerance in any particular circuit for exhibiting infinite gain before it melts, explodes, etc. So, in theory: energy is limitless while in practice our circuits can only take so much abuse beyond their tolerance. I think impulse current is a stressful experience for the physicality of a circuit at any quantity since impulses are unpredictable, extremely variable, etc despite the irony that impulse current springs from infinity: the ultimate state of non-stress!

I once visited a dream analyst who also specialized in the I Ching, among other things, and he said that: "the experience of some reality or another by the mind beyond its cherished habits can be very enlightening. But woe to whomever can't handle that experience. For they could go insane if not adequately mature enough." And the body must be stable as well.

Borax in my fruit juice helps me since my body has gone through tremendous stressers which would have left me dead a few times over had I not investigated various health protocols. Whatever helps the body will help the mind.
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 03-26-2018 at 12:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-25-2018, 11:56 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikrovolt View Post
We talk about the higgs field we can trap an electron by a proton.
Looking at magnets we can describe the energy as a local source
and we describe a source called higgs that is turned on everywhere.
Higgs field gives the electron mass.
We do not understand what dark matter is.
The gravitational lensing allows us to approximate a simulation. as shown

https://youtu.be/-4Mz4OGVC_U?t=3114
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 03-26-2018, 02:36 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,820
will look

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
I had a hard time finding Eric's schematic. This was the closest I came to...
http://www.energeticforum.com/201435-post20.html
Different from that - may have been posted by Polakowski.

I think I have them in my archives. I'll post them here if I can find them.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2018, 04:22 AM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
Infinity is not intangible.
The early days of computers were dealing with negative zero, but couldn't deal with it in an honest way. They had to hide it by performing two's compliment arithmetic at the terminus of an operation so as to not result in a negative zero whenever a quantity was subtracted from itself.
...

Unlimited gains are the infinite potential realm which the simulator suggests due to my interpretation of trends. A circuit trending upwards in gain with no terminus in sight, accelerating logarithmically as Eric says they do when exhibiting the behavior of an impulse current, is an unlimited gain in my opinion. Why? Because the simulator has an arbitrary limit set at 10 raised to the power of +/- 48 (again, if my memory serves me last time I checked Paul Falstad's electronic simulator).

And BTW, I think the LMD module of Eric performs at least one function which I can recognize: that of magnifying a trend. So, if a trending circuit is gaining, then that's what it will continue to do ad infinitum. But if the circuit is trending towards null, balance, or zero mid-line on the oscilloscope tracing, then the LMD will lock in that trend until its limit is reached or its asymptote is approached from which an infinite limit may be suggestive.
...

Oh, and by another way, one limit - or balance - of Nature is the tolerance in any particular circuit for exhibiting infinite gain before it melts, explodes, etc. So, in theory: energy is limitless while in practice our circuits can only take so much abuse beyond their tolerance. I think impulse current is a stressful experience for the physicality of a circuit at any quantity since impulses are unpredictable, extremely variable, etc despite the irony that impulse current springs from infinity: the ultimate state of non-stress!

I once visited a dream analyst who also specialized in the I Ching, among other things, and he said that: "the experience of some reality or another by the mind beyond its cherished habits can be very enlightening. But woe to whomever can't handle that experience. For they could go insane if not adequately mature enough." And the body must be stable as well.

Borax in my fruit juice helps me since my body has gone through tremendous stressers which would have left me dead a few times over had I not investigated various health protocols. Whatever helps the body will help the mind.
From the definition itself "Infinity" if you have got away to tell what is "Infinity" then that is not "infinity".. but we can grasp the Idea of "Infinity" really well..

negative zero are errors and illusions and are one of the "Contradictory terminology" that exist in our reality that we cannot define properly.
number zero serves as a reference.. the sole purpose so that we can "Quantify".

the results on the simulators are only defined in the limit of the simulators itself. the effects are only up to what the programmer understand in the reality that he is trying to "copy". If he missed one thing, the result can be a total loop or infinity. I speak of one who does programming as well. and Infinity or Loop is the thing we avoid/eliminate as It will cause the program to "Hang"..

but not in real life experiments.. I've designed and built circuits that was supposed to have "Infinite" gains according to my understanding but did not.. simply because I have not understood the reality completely..
but I learned from that..
and this is what I'm telling now.. It will show a "gain" but will start to decline if you do not sustain it from some source..
one thing that I'm sure based on my previous experiments.. all the "Potential" go down to the equilibrium of the system, the "Imbalance" will balance, the rate of which this "Potential" returns to equilibrium with regards to the time It took to equalize in seconds is called "Energy". EPD has been telling that right?.. it's not some primary thing..
remember?..

Dielectricity , Magnetism, Space & Time
Mass, Temperature, Space & Time

but sometimes it feels as if something is missing or not right in it..
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-29-2018, 05:02 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 787
Magamp Images Galore

Enjoying this thread. Thought I'd throw in this link to magamp images:
https://www.google.ca/search?q=overu...w=1920&bih=925
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-30-2018, 04:42 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Maybe so

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
From the definition itself "Infinity" if you have got away to tell what is "Infinity" then that is not "infinity".. but we can grasp the Idea of "Infinity" really well..

negative zero are errors and illusions and are one of the "Contradictory terminology" that exist in our reality that we cannot define properly.
number zero serves as a reference.. the sole purpose so that we can "Quantify".
It had appeared to me that one's compliment arithmetic's need to polarize two relativistic limits, within the boundaries of the number of digits/bits within its registers, as two similar magnitudes of opposite polarity equivalent for all intents and purposes as its definition of infinity was also formulated in the Tao and I Ching.

Taking this one step further, I believe this is useful in defining the division by zero problem as a permutation of four options.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf The Four Quadrant Theory of Division by Zero.pdf (38.1 KB, 3 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-30-2018, 05:43 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Mixed agreements/disagreements, here...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
the results on the simulators are only defined in the limit of the simulators itself. the effects are only up to what the programmer understand in the reality that he is trying to "copy". If he missed one thing, the result can be a total loop or infinity. I speak of one who does programming as well. and Infinity or Loop is the thing we avoid/eliminate as It will cause the program to "Hang"..
Regardless of any simulator's limitations, Paul Falstad's electronic simulator has taught me - by way of setting an example - about the basics of overunity theory which is readily available on the internet, such as the concepts of: discontinuity along a transmission line, phase conjugation, ...

Reflections of signals on conducting lines - Wikipedia
Reflection and transmission of waves
An Intuitive Explanation of Phase Conjugation

... and the exclusion from the Law of the Conservation of Energy occurring under one loop hole....

is.gd - Shortened URL
Conservation of energy - Wikipedia

... and the epitome of fruitful gain: Eric's recipe for the synthesis of electricity as noted below.

At least Paul's simulator does not implement a policy of suppressing surges early on in their development such as Micro Cap does, nor prevent any buildup of electrical potential such as LTSpice does with its error message: "Floating Node".

Paul did have one annoying policy which I removed from my mirror of his simulator, that of arbitrarily assigning a limit to the current of diodes and transistors stating in his program source code that they tend to give 'weird' results which I assume he meant anomalous overunity, but is otherwise pure theory as imperfect as that is. The user certainly has to use his or her imagination to make up the difference. Namely, any of my simulations cannot be treated as if they are schematics to build from. Instead, they have to be interpreted by people like yourself who know better.

It would be better to call a simulation of overunity an indication of an alternate line of reasoning the details of which (except in Eric's case) is missing from our collective awareness. Someday, when public/corporate policy stops competing against our pursuit of learning, we'll have simulators more similar to the perspective of a Dollard, Bedini, etc. Until then, I have to make do with what's available, push the limits of convention to initiate reasoning along new threads of thought and hope that I leave my world in better shape than I found it. Sometimes, this is not accomplished by taking the direct approach of being a do-gooder, but by taking the opposite approach by being - what society more often than not deems to call such people: the outlaw (think: "Outlaw Josie Wales") - or rabble rouser.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
but not in real life experiments.. I've designed and built circuits that was supposed to have "Infinite" gains according to my understanding but did not.. simply because I have not understood the reality completely..
but I learned from that..
and this is what I'm telling now.. It will show a "gain" but will start to decline if you do not sustain it from some source..
Quote:
Discontinuities along a transmission line, of a closed loop geometry, can result in a rampant escalation of power towards infinity - despite the initial fixed amount of energy - based on the complex interaction of reflected (conventional absorption and discharge) and transmitted (possibly skin effect) waves interacting with an extremely low-level capacitor, or pair of capacitors, of 1pF or less between two transformers.

http://is.gd/lmdmod

This delayed Lenz Effect, resulting from Wave Discontinuity occurring in a closed loop, prevents resolution of wave splitting ...

http://is.gd/phase_conjugate_waveform
https://cdn.instructables.com/FPH/PF...E.jpg?crop=3:2
( from: http://is.gd/makewaves )

... and increases frequency at the expense of amplitude. With the help of mechanical switching, surges can be maintained, indefinitely. It is these surges which will add to the depletion of amplitude thus insuring the continuation of magnification of power to any degree desirable.
This is why a lot of my simulations required the constant reminder of a surge generated by an ON/OFF switch or a toggle switch, similar in concept to the initial surge at the beginning of startup, to constantly sustain an upwards rise of absolute magnitude....

http://is.gd/freebatteryenergy
http://is.gd/battcharvp
http://is.gd/highfreq

These and other circuits of similar construction are all underneath the menubar entitled...

Vinyasi.Cts / Analog Auto-Switching

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
one thing that I'm sure based on my previous experiments.. all the "Potential" go down to the equilibrium of the system, the "Imbalance" will balance, the rate of which this "Potential" returns to equilibrium with regards to the time It took to equalize in seconds is called "Energy". EPD has been telling that right?.. it's not some primary thing..
remember?..

Dielectricity , Magnetism, Space & Time
Mass, Temperature, Space & Time
Magnetism surrounded by a changing electrostatic field.
The LMD module alters the dielectric line of force, tied at both ends to the dielectric of two capacitors, over time through which it passes one of each inductor per LMD module to give infinite build up of overall energy within its coils....

For example...

http://is.gd/infinite_watts
http://is.gd/infinitewatts

CMF files are simulated in...
https://sourceforge.net/projects/circuitmod/
...with Java installed on the computer...
http://java.com/
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 03-30-2018 at 06:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-30-2018, 08:21 PM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
disagreement

This is old video but a bit related,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B2Fwo_k9ss

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors, I've figured I could go as much as power more and more light bulbs but it will get dimmer and dimmer as I add more, very simple because they are now wires in series, I tried to put inductors along the circuit and found that to be beneficial, put transformers and manage to light bulbs while having output...
then I got excited and tried to loop it back to the source to try to maintain the "Energy" while powering the load..
nothing can be further from the truth..
as soon as I rectify the output and dump it into the cap threw it back into the source, I've got reduced amp draw, when I try to switch the source it slowly dies.. ok that's that...

but what about the gain?.. well I have more light.. and an output while having light.. instead of just a single bright light.. a bit lousy reasoning but that is how I understood it, and I didn't bother to accurately measure..

going back to "infinite watts" circuit.. let say you manage to get a "gain" from that circuit.. the backemf / lenz law increased the current all throughout the circuit... EVEN AT THE PRIMARY COIL CONNECTED TO THE 60hz GRID.. now what would be the limit of the current?... I would say it will depend on that inductor with the "Infinity" symbol... since it has no load it serves as a ballast.. since all your transformers have lenz effect in them cancelling the magnetic fields and increasing the current..

phase conjugation do exist.. but still, your circuit (inductor-Cap-Inductor-Cap loop), connection is a series one... series circuits have same current flowing in it.. the current that will induce the 3rd stage and 4th,5th and so on will be the same as the current in the first stage (ideal components)... sad to say, but in reality there are still loses..

the circuit might say an infinite current will build-up at the last coil.. but that's just not happening. at least in my circuits. it could have been better If it were powering loads at each stage. instead of just running transformers only.. It could have atleast show some gain.. but currently no..

the theory is interesting but.
I think the simulator is not compliant to reality.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-30-2018, 09:40 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
So, there's no electrostatic lines of force passing through each transformer coil?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
This is old video but a bit related,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B2Fwo_k9ss

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors, I've figured I could go as much as power more and more light bulbs but it will get dimmer and dimmer as I add more, very simple because they are now wires in series, I tried to put inductors along the circuit and found that to be beneficial, put transformers and manage to light bulbs while having output...
then I got excited and tried to loop it back to the source to try to maintain the "Energy" while powering the load..
nothing can be further from the truth..
as soon as I rectify the output and dump it into the cap threw it back into the source, I've got reduced amp draw, when I try to switch the source it slowly dies.. ok that's that...

but what about the gain?.. well I have more light.. and an output while having light.. instead of just a single bright light.. a bit lousy reasoning but that is how I understood it, and I didn't bother to accurately measure..

going back to "infinite watts" circuit.. let say you manage to get a "gain" from that circuit.. the backemf / lenz law increased the current all throughout the circuit... EVEN AT THE PRIMARY COIL CONNECTED TO THE 60hz GRID.. now what would be the limit of the current?... I would say it will depend on that inductor with the "Infinity" symbol... since it has no load it serves as a ballast.. since all your transformers have lenz effect in them cancelling the magnetic fields and increasing the current..

phase conjugation do exist.. but still, your circuit (inductor-Cap-Inductor-Cap loop), connection is a series one... series circuits have same current flowing in it.. the current that will induce the 3rd stage and 4th,5th and so on will be the same as the current in the first stage (ideal components)... sad to say, but in reality there are still loses..

the circuit might say an infinite current will build-up at the last coil.. but that's just not happening. at least in my circuits. it could have been better If it were powering loads at each stage. instead of just running transformers only.. It could have atleast show some gain.. but currently no..

the theory is interesting but.
I think the simulator is not compliant to reality.
Anatomy of a Surge in Slow Motion and the Synthesis of Electricity
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 03-31-2018 at 02:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-31-2018, 08:40 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Current does not maintain itself along a series circuit as evidenced by Eric's video.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
This is old video but a bit related,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B2Fwo_k9ss

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors, I've figured I could go as much as power more and more light bulbs but it will get dimmer and dimmer as I add more, ...
Obviously a TEM arrangement. Not the same as mine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
...very simple because they are now wires in series, I tried to put inductors along the circuit and found that to be beneficial, put transformers and manage to light bulbs while having output...
then I got excited and tried to loop it back to the source to try to maintain the "Energy" while powering the load..
nothing can be further from the truth..
as soon as I rectify the output and dump it into the cap threw it back into the source, I've got reduced amp draw, when I try to switch the source it slowly dies.. ok that's that...

but what about the gain?.. well I have more light.. and an output while having light.. instead of just a single bright light.. a bit lousy reasoning but that is how I understood it, and I didn't bother to accurately measure..

going back to "infinite watts" circuit.. let say you manage to get a "gain" from that circuit.. the backemf / lenz law increased the current all throughout the circuit... EVEN AT THE PRIMARY COIL CONNECTED TO THE 60hz GRID.. now what would be the limit of the current?... I would say it will depend on that inductor with the "Infinity" symbol... since it has no load it serves as a ballast.. since all your transformers have lenz effect in them cancelling the magnetic fields and increasing the current..

phase conjugation do exist.. but still, your circuit (inductor-Cap-Inductor-Cap loop), connection is a series one... series circuits have same current flowing in it.. the current that will induce the 3rd stage and 4th,5th and so on will be the same as the current in the first stage (ideal components)... sad to say, but in reality there are still loses..
Series circuits is not relevant. What's relevant is: "Does the circuit in question exhibit the predominant character of a TEM arrangement or an LMD? This will determine the outcome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
the circuit might say an infinite current will build-up at the last coil.. but that's just not happening. at least in my circuits. it could have been better If it were powering loads at each stage. instead of just running transformers only.. It could have atleast show some gain.. but currently no..

the theory is interesting but.
I think the simulator is not compliant to reality.
The simulation is compliant to Eric's demonstration caught on video tape by Peter....

Current does not maintain itself down the length of a TEM or an LMD as is demonstrated by Eric's heat measurements of the coils and capacitors in his experiment using his hands for sensors...
https://youtu.be/6BnCUBKgnnc?t=30m40s

That's the fact. Now for my speculation derived from Eric quoting Tesla's claim that Tesla achieved 50 times faster than the speed of light with his LMD experiments. I suspect this occurred when Tesla bounced an LMD wave off the moon. It's entire trip was much longer than that traveled by the LMD waves in Eric's experiment. Eric merely achieved one half pi times the speed of light: an acceleration of about 57% faster. Since I further speculate that LMD waves behave the opposite of TEM waves, then this explains how Tesla achieved such a miraculous feat. What is this difference between LMDs and TEMs?

LMDs speed up as they travel through a compressed medium or through a vacuum since both mediums offer LMDs the same characteristic behavior: they allow shock waves to travel through them and an LMD is a shock wave, not a ripple wave such as a TEM.

Of course, TEMs slow down as they travel through a lengthening of their medium of a conductive pathway.

The mystery of accelerating current is to first accelerate an LMD by reducing capacitance to ridiculous levels (in proportion to the level of inductance of an LMD's coils).


This reduction of capacitance will pragmatically require a greater distance for an LMD to travel through the dielectric of a capacitor relative to its surface area. This increased distance will accelerate an LMD.

Furthermore, Newton's Cradle is a mechanical analog to how longitudinal waves actively translate into transverse waves.


The stationary spheres in the center are passing longitudinal shock waves through them just as Tesla passed the same type of waves through bedrock emanating out of Wardenclyffe and also through the medium of empty space en route to the moon and back.

The moving spheres on either end are exhibiting transverse wave behavior in as much as they will be the cause of this toy slowing down and eventually coming to a complete stop due to thermodynamic losses.

The boundary between the moving spheres and the stationary spheres is analogous to the boundary between the dielectric and the conductive plates on either side of the dielectric material in a capacitor.




But for anyone who wants the complicated stuff, see pg. 9 and continuing of...
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...geticForum.pdf

Quote:
"...the smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be stored..." - from pg. 14, 4.
Hence, the increase of space across the dielectric of a capacitor is also the decrease of counterspace and the acceleration of a longitudinal wave passing through it.

Since space is the inverse relation to counterspace, the more the space the less the counterspace and vice versa.

The less the counterspace, the less is the transit time for a longitudinal wave passing through both despite the increase of space.

Space and counterspace are directly proportional for the inductance of a coil (resistors, such as lamps, notwithstanding). This has the effect of increasing resistance and dissipation (as heat) for the transverse wave within a coil whose wire has been lengthened.

Space and counterspace are inversely proportional for the dielectric of a capacitor. This has the effect of decreasing transit time in counterspace and accelerating the rate of motion in space of a longitudinal wave when the span across the dielectric is increased.

Eric says it best...
https://is.gd/spacerel

PS--
https://youtu.be/cCJcU7INwnU?t=3h45m15s
http://is.gd/spacedisjunction

It's amazing that I came up with the premise to this video seemingly on my own inspiration when in reality Eric Dollard had already talked about this....
https://youtu.be/oXGdUXLmgRo
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 05-05-2018 at 05:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-01-2018, 07:03 AM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
so If I use light bulbs instead of coils its considered transverse?..
If I use a battery dc source instead of ac source its considered transverse?..

As far as I know, when the capacitor is placed to isolate the source from the load/coil, it should be considered Longitudinal as the phase conjugate electricity is powering the load, as one plate of the capacitor becomes LESS negative, the other side tries to be MORE negative.. and vise versa.. I see it as a natural reaction to pressure (voltage) changes..

on TEM, LMD dispute.. in both our circuits, they both have transverse waves that radiates away due to conduction current, and Longitudinal waves that is happening in the capacitors or wherever there is a conductor-insulator-conductor arrangement and this is due to the electric potential build-up..

in a circuit..
whenever there is a CAPACITANCE there should exist a Longitudinal wave..
whenever there is a CONDUCTOR there should exist a Transverse wave..

I really see it as simple as that...

and why do you make it sound like conduction current is Transverse?..
that is like saying a water flowing in the pipe is transverse..

of all this what is the relevance of it to our discussion which is the "Unlimited Gain" ??..
I know it's relevant to transmission..
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-01-2018, 10:14 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Are the light bulbs in Parallel? Not in Series?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
so If I use light bulbs instead of coils its considered transverse?..
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors,
Obviously a TEM arrangement. Not the same as mine due to light bulbs are in the wrong place. They should be in parallel; not in series to be an LMD configuration. Only capacitors may be in series. Otherwise, it's a TEM arrangement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
...very simple because they are now wires in series
Besides, are resistive loads, ie lamps, equivalent to inductive loads, ie coils and transformers?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 04-02-2018, 09:30 AM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
I should've drawn the circuit instead

Back_N_Forth_Circuit.PNG

vinyasi,

see diagram above, that is the basic concept of that circuit, It charges a capacitor through a load, and discharges the capacitor through a load as well..

when the switch flips at Pt. A current will flow that can be calculated using Load1+Load2 resistance and source voltage.. so does when the switch flips at Pt. B...
so is the circuit Transverse only?.. or Longitudinal Only?.. if so how?..

I have answered that both wave exist in the circuit and so does to yours. and I've explained how I perceived it..
I hope you could answer...

as to the series and parallel disagreement..
If you will look at it closely, when the switch flips at Pt B. not only everything is in SERIES LOOP connection, capacitors and Load/Inductor is also in parallel..
and this is why I'm saying your Inductors are in series.

that circuit in my video,.. It's main purpose was to show and prove the existence of that "Phase Conjugate" to MYSELF that I'm willing to share....
I'm not comparing Inductors to resistors, what I'm trying to say is, that current in your circuit will not go to "Infinity" as what you are claiming.
and please don't make it sound like I only tried with "lamps".. the build has terminals I can switch to Inductive loads whenever I wish.. (which I already did).. I even tried to use a short piece of wire.. to prove that what I'm saying that the circuit is in "SERIES LOOP" still a series connection that we can add all the resistance and determine the current flowing in it..

whatever it is that your seeing in the simulators are not what I'm seeing in real life circuits.. that is the fact.. proven by experiment.

I hope I have made myself clear to that.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-02-2018, 11:59 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 462
Thumbs up Since your circuit is both LMD and TEM ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
Attachment 20604

vinyasi,

see diagram above, that is the basic concept of that circuit, It charges a capacitor through a load, and discharges the capacitor through a load as well..

when the switch flips at Pt. A current will flow that can be calculated using Load1+Load2 resistance and source voltage.. so does when the switch flips at Pt. B...
so is the circuit Transverse only?.. or Longitudinal Only?.. if so how?..
Both. Transverse in the coils and Longitudinal in the caps. But which predominates? And which is the consequence...Decomposition or Synthesis?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricards View Post
I have answered that both wave exist in the circuit and so does to yours. and I've explained how I perceived it..
I hope you could answer...

as to the series and parallel disagreement..
If you will look at it closely, when the switch flips at Pt B. not only everything is in SERIES LOOP connection, capacitors and Load/Inductor is also in parallel..
and this is why I'm saying your Inductors are in series.

that circuit in my video,.. It's main purpose was to show and prove the existence of that "Phase Conjugate" to MYSELF that I'm willing to share....
I'm not comparing Inductors to resistors, what I'm trying to say is, that current in your circuit will not go to "Infinity" as what you are claiming.
and please don't make it sound like I only tried with "lamps".. the build has terminals I can switch to Inductive loads whenever I wish.. (which I already did).. I even tried to use a short piece of wire.. to prove that what I'm saying that the circuit is in "SERIES LOOP" still a series connection that we can add all the resistance and determine the current flowing in it..

whatever it is that your seeing in the simulators are not what I'm seeing in real life circuits.. that is the fact.. proven by experiment.

I hope I have made myself clear to that.
...then those factors are canceled. But another factor remains....

Do the capacitors accelerate current outside themselves in the rest of the circuit? Is the relationship between the capacitors and the inductors such that the inductors allow the capacitors to accelerate current in the inductors?

If the overall capacitance is high enough relative to the overall inductance, then nothing non-conventional will occur: electricity will decompose into its constituent parts of magnetism and electrostatic charge adding to thermodynamic losses, thus decelerating the circuit's current.

Yet, if the overall capacitance is low enough relative to the overall inductance, then electricity will synthesize from its component parts adding to its losses. And if it adds more than it loses, then overunity should manifest.

There are two quotes of Eric stating that mere coils and caps can synthesize electricity.

Here is one source...
last paragraph of page nine...
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...geticForum.pdf

And somewhere in here is the other citation...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw

The http:// is.gd/ acmotor simulation is not an LMD nor a TEM modular structure, yet the inclusion of the low level pair of caps alters the overall behavior since they are low enough in Farads to accelerate current against the resistance of the wire - especially the wire in the coils. And the coils lack sufficient resistance due to their moderately low level of inductance and thus fail to offer any significant resistance to the accelerative influence contributed by the caps.

The biggest problem in overunity is resistance in the wire: simple resistance and inductive resistance.

Eric mentions the ratio between the capacitance vs the inductance of a coil in this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TttH....be&t=3h07m01s
...in which if those two factors are balanced in a solenoid, then you get a Monopolar Transformer.

It is this ratio that I seek by trial and error since I know no engineering and possess none of that skill. It's usually not precise in the simulator, but multiple windows of minimums vs maximums of the circuit's inductors and capacitors for overunity to occur.

Parallel vs Series is shorthand for indicating which of the two constituents of electricity predominates if we have a daisy chain of modules: a classic Eric Dollard analog computer. But it's not always so clear cut as your circuit and my http:// is.gd/ acmotor circuit demonstrate. Then we have to be more accurate in our appraisal of the situation by admitting that parallel vs series has nothing to do with it. It's the longitudinal vs transverse which counts and that's determined by both the arrangement of coils and caps in a circuit, but also by the overall values of their inductances and capacitances contributing to the circuit, because the question still remains: is current accelerating or decelerating in the wires and the coils? The current in the coils will only accelerate if the cap's longitudinal wave in the counterspace dimension gets small. When this happens in a cap, the opposite effect occurs in the space of a cap's dielectric material in which the space, or distance, increases. In other words, the dielectric along the line of transit gets longer separating the cap's conductive plates vs their square area shrinks by comparison. Since the longitudinal wave will have less distance to travel in its counterspatial medium of the dielectric of a capacitor, the spatial dimension to manufacture that dielectric will have to do the opposite: fabricate a thick layer of plastic or aluminum oxide embedded in a ceramic material to increase the spatial distance of the dielectric lines of force stretching between the cap's conductive plates even though in the reality of counterspace the opposite is happening: the counterspatial transit length of a longitudinal wave traveling through the dielectric material of a capacitor shrinks. Then Nature balances this by making it appear to our spatial reference that the longitudinal wave inside a cap's dielectric material has accelerated when in fact all the wave did was have less distance in its medium of counterspace to travel to get from one conductive plate on one side of a capacitor to the other plate on the other side.

But at the boundary between the dielectric material of a capacitor and each plate on either side, a transition occurs: the longitudinal wave traveling across a dielectric medium converts into a transverse wave at either plate of the capacitor imparting all of the longitudinal wave's acceleration or deceleration to the transverse conversion of itself. This conversion makes it possible for the capacitor to accelerate or decelerate the current immediately adjacent to either side of its two terminal connections of the surrounding circuit.

Thus, the magic happens (the magic being anomalous unconventional synthesis of electricity) inside the caps if it happens at all while we don't appreciate this until it appears in the coils and wires where we can measure it, because counterspatial behaviors cannot be measured, but they can be inferred with the help of a concise dose of Eric's theories.

As a postscript...
A dielectric medium in our reference of space can be either of two extremes: the extreme compression of bedrock which Tesla set his ground transmission at Wardenclyffe into or the complete void of empty space. Either way, a longitudinal wave traveling through either of these two spatial mediums will behave the same way.

A transverse wave will only occur if molecules (for instance) occur at just the right intervals of distance between each molecule for a domino effect to occur, namely: the longitudinal wave can no longer travel through this impure medium of interspersed obstructions without being forced into a conversion of itself into a transverse wave and thus lose all of its force in a very thermodynamically predictable fashion. Transmission through wet soil will do this.

These two options gives us two choices for a dielectric medium within a capacitor. It also gave Tesla an opportunity to conduct a longitudinal experiment exceeding the dielectric capacity of manmade capacitors by sending a longitudinal wave to the moon and back through the medium of empty space. This is where: "Energy from the Vacuum" gets its relevance. That large distance in space resulted in a ridiculously shrunken distance in its counterspatial counterpart which had the distinct advantage of accelerating that transmission to a factor of fifty times faster than the speed of light - much faster than Eric's Borderland experiment in which Eric merely exceeded the speed of light by a factor of 57%, or one half pi times the speed of light.

violation of speed limit of light
https://youtu.be/6BnCUBKgnnc?t=47m23s
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 04-02-2018 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-03-2018, 01:12 AM
ricards ricards is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 258
agreement

I guess we have come to an agreement there..
yes both wave exist but IMO neither predominates. current traveling in wires generates transverse, and voltage build-up on caps, generates longitudinal,..

decomposition or synthesis?.. my current understanding of "energy" led me to think neither, for me energy is a rate of imbalance returning to equilibrium, which we can quantify referencing to the "ambient" or "ground" with regards to electricity..

another look at "current accelerating on low capacitance"..
I see it more as Its "Instantaneous" since its a "Reaction" on the other side of the capacitor... (newton's third law of motion).

IMO electricity is much more understood mechanically by grasping the "Aether" concept. electricity to me makes much more sense with it. rather than the "Vacuum".
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
energy, capacitors, pair, youtube, saturation, eric, gain, lmd, circuits, reference, dollards, computer, low, load, analog, simulate, component, files, http://vinyasi.info/ne, file, counter-space, air, multiplication, components, ground

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers