Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube ONLY 13% OF SEATS AVAILABLE!!!*** 2017 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***


* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-03-2017, 03:23 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
"How much energy is there in a permanent magnet"?

This thread has been suggested as an alternative place to discuss how
much energy a magnet has whether it be in more than one form.
Forms of electricity or in the form of FLUX.




Alternative views should be explored, not met with rejection before
the evidence is heard. If you can't retain a large bank of data and place
the idea's into a sentence structure, then let the one's who can, do this
job. Not all have the ability to teach nor do they have the time it takes
to properly build a step by step case and point.

We can not continue on the same path of current energy models listed in
our books, that are as old as 150 years. I am sure all respectable counter
views bases on school books will be received and properly debunked in
a few key places.

Many inventors have taught for decades the a magnet is a limitless
supply of energy if certain guidelines are met. This thread is in favor of
looking at the limitless energy available, not why it is impossible to
even suggest.

Presenting YOUR view and dominating plus drowning out all others will
be considered a violation so if you call names or belittle have the guts
to remove it afterward, if you must attack.

No one likes a thread side lined or derailed regardless of how many smooth
sounding words you us.

Thank you and I hope each of you can enjoy the others personal way
of seeing and explaining opposing views.

__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-04-2017 at 12:02 AM.
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 05-03-2017, 05:36 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Magnetic force between two parallel current carrying wires

@BroMikey,

Thanks for starting this thread.

Here's an excellent educational video on the magnetic force between two parallel current carrying wires:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeUyPy1AjdQ
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-03-2017 at 05:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2017, 06:23 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Ampere's Force Law

The separation force between the two current carrying wires can be measured with a spring scale, and is calibrated in Newtons, a unit of force roughly equivalent to a fifth of a pound. Naturally, the force is directly proportional to the current in the wires. This force is expressed in Gauss. "The gauss, abbreviated as G or Gs, is the cgs unit of measurement of magnetic flux density".

"The form of Ampere's force law commonly given was derived by Maxwell and is one of several expressions consistent with the original experiments of Ampère and Gauss".

This force law establishes an electrical current to magnetic flux equivalency. There's a corollary, which is the magnetic flux to electrical current equivalency. Dr. Dragone did his doctoral thesis on this subject, and his theories were tested by me with his "Magnet Pump".

Let's say we build a coil around a tube magnet and feed enough current into it to suppress the permanent magnet field. What happens when we cut the power off? The resurging magnet field returns the electrical power to the inductor. This is the special relationship that's the central subject of this thread: How much energy is in a permanent magnet?
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-03-2017 at 07:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2017, 08:53 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Lambda 13.7

The magnet has to do work to re-assert it's field after the electrical suppression field in the coil is curtailed, and consumes heat and grows cold. This work generates excess energy, and the magnet absorbs heat from the ambient environment to fuel itself. Here JLN measures the power in and power out at a ratio of nearly 14 times:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WEXbR9TBMM

The catch is that, if we had to generate the heat the magnets consume with electrical current, the COP would be very close to unity!

"Magnetic refrigeration is a cooling technology based on the magnetocaloric effect".

Pictured below:

"Gadolinium alloy heats up inside the magnetic field and loses thermal energy to the environment, so it exits the field cooler than when it entered".
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-06-2017 at 11:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2017, 10:13 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Colonel Bearden's MEG

The reason why Colonel Bearden's MEG company filed for chapter 13 is that it would take all his MEG output to power a heater to return the magnets to starting temperature; So, no OU as claimed.
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-03-2017 at 10:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2017, 10:56 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
@BroMikey,

Thanks for starting this thread.

Here's an excellent educational video on the magnetic force between two parallel current carrying wires:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeUyPy1AjdQ
Wow I really do like this guys way of speaking, guys like him are hard
to find. He is young and sharp able to instruct. I look all of the time for
good speakers and I just don't find them.

Give me a chance to catch up on the reading.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2017, 11:01 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Ampere Gauss-Watt Tesla.

Tinselkoala, Milehigh, Citfta and bistander all argued with me on the OU site and again here at Energetic Forum about the electrical equivalent to magnetic flux.

Citfta really piled on a heap of rubbish about the stupidity of coupling Watts and Teslas. It should be abundantly clear to everyone how Watts and Teslas
are simply scaled up values of Amperes and Gauss; Both electrical power equivalents of magnetic flux. This issue helped get me re-moderated over there as Synchro1.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2017, 12:30 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
Tinselkoala, Milehigh, Citfta and bistander all argued with me on the OU site and again here at Energetic Forum about the electrical equivalent to magnetic flux.
.
Thought they'de gang up on ya hey? Gang Bangers
I am sure these guys have wonderful bedside manner using watt
burning math.

We need some new fresh horses, ones that point out all the details
from start to finish without using that condescending tone.

Let'em try it, they all did the same thing to me Allen, they have no
clue who they are trying to scold.

So now you have your delivery platform that has included Beardon
good going, I forgot how many key players we have as examples
with experimental data, not just McGraw Hill parrots.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2017, 02:25 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Quote from Stephan Hartiberlin:

Milehigh is on moderation now also again !

Quote from: synchro1 on May 03, 2017, 05:36:24 PM

#1395 "Kiss my ass" Milehigh.

The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2017, 03:25 PM
Diplomacy Diplomacy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
"Gadolinium alloy heats up inside the magnetic field and loses thermal energy to the environment, so it exits the field cooler than when it entered".
I was reading about this last night, came across an article while looking at different methods of cooling.

The ideal one for our purposes would undergo a phase transition at about room temperature while being as cheap as possible; we can settle with a slightly less efficient material so long as it is possible to extract the heat from it at a reasonable temperature.

Combine this with a properly designed bifilar pancake system and some piping and a pumping system we could get diy refrigeration.

Looking at prices of Gadolinium, it appears to be in the 300USD per kilo range so it will be pricey to experiment, however a solid state Figuera device style refrigerator oscillating 2 or more bifilar pancake coils through a block of the stuff would be a gift that would continue to operate for one's great grand children if it was made with care.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet...rature_devices

There is a table of what has already been done with it, we need magnetic fields with a strength measuring somewhere from .5 to 5 Teslas.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-04-2017, 07:23 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diplomacy View Post
I was reading about this last night, came across an article while looking at different methods of cooling.

The ideal one for our purposes would undergo a phase transition at about room temperature while being as cheap as possible; we can settle with a slightly less efficient material so long as it is possible to extract the heat from it at a reasonable temperature.

Combine this with a properly designed bifilar pancake system and some piping and a pumping system we could get diy refrigeration.

Looking at prices of Gadolinium, it appears to be in the 300USD per kilo range so it will be pricey to experiment, however a solid state Figuera device style refrigerator oscillating 2 or more bifilar pancake coils through a block of the stuff would be a gift that would continue to operate for one's great grand children if it was made with care.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet...rature_devices

There is a table of what has already been done with it, we need magnetic fields with a strength measuring somewhere from .5 to 5 Teslas.
@Diplomacy,

5 Teslas of magnetic force would require an input of 18,000 Joules or 5 watt hours in a coil of 1 Henry of inductance. That's a lot of power for a Figuera device to generate isn't it?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-04-2017, 08:00 PM
Diplomacy Diplomacy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
@Diplomacy,

5 Teslas of magnetic force would require an input of 18,000 Joules or 5 watt hours in a coil of 1 Henry of inductance. That's a lot of power for a Figuera device to generate isn't it?
My understanding is that the device shunts potential back and forth between the two sets of electromagnets, so long as you don't let the field collapse entirely you can rebuild it from partial collapse "cheaper" so to speak.

It is quite a bit of power though, yes.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-04-2017, 08:39 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 929
More AB BS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diplomacy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
5 Teslas of magnetic force would require an input of 18,000 Joules or 5 watt hours in a coil of 1 Henry of inductance. That's a lot of power for a Figuera device to generate isn't it?

It is quite a bit of power though, yes.
Hi Diplomacy,

I see you're new here. Allen and BM don't care much for facts or accurate calculations or even common sense. 5 watt hours. "Quite a bit of power"? I guess it's relative, but 5 wh of energy is about what a modern refrigerator uses in 7 minutes. And 5 T magnetic field is greater than what is used in MRI and would typically use superconducting coils if needed for more than a fraction of a second.

I don't intend to get involved in this thread. BM, the OP, has said in the first post that he's not wanting truth and facts here, just the infinite energy which he knows is there. I just chimed in to warn you.

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2017, 09:19 PM
Diplomacy Diplomacy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Hi Diplomacy,

I see you're new here. Allen and BM don't care much for facts or accurate calculations or even common sense. 5 watt hours. "Quite a bit of power"? I guess it's relative, but 5 wh of energy is about what a modern refrigerator uses in 7 minutes. And 5 T magnetic field is greater than what is used in MRI and would typically use superconducting coils if needed for more than a fraction of a second.

I don't intend to get involved in this thread. BM, the OP, has said in the first post that he's not wanting truth and facts here, just the infinite energy which he knows is there. I just chimed in to warn you.

bi
I took his post to mean "5 watt hours of power every time the electromagnet is fired up".

Making such a magnetic field conventionally I think is obviously not practical, but this doesn't seem to be a place for the conventional and the Tesla pancake style coils show promise.

In either case I am here to learn and discuss, please forgive any mistakes.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-05-2017, 02:56 AM
Gambeir's Avatar
Gambeir Gambeir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Peoples republic of Washington
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
@BroMikey,

Thanks for starting this thread.

Here's an excellent educational video on the magnetic force between two parallel current carrying wires:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeUyPy1AjdQ
I got some issues here with this video. What they don't tell you about Left hand and Right hand rules is the history behind those ideas and which have now produced confusion about polarity charges and their direction of flow, and which originated with ideas about whether a positive was ground or a negative was ground. So you have to be aware that a right hand rule can be applied to a negative polarity. The way to determine which is which is to look at the ground. Be aware of this historical fact. Not many places tell you about this historical screw up: Triva I ran in to while examining the rule.

* There is no law which says that the right hand rule is only applied to a positive charge. That only happens to be the way it's applied in our time. Not how it was applied at a previous time.

Now I know that I don't know anything about electronics and electrical theory, but while the theory may be correctly stated, it doesn't actually work that way. Not unless electrical magnetism is different somehow.

How many people have actually taken two magnets and followed along with the ideas presented in the video? I have and it doesn't work. The drawings of the current flows in the video are both flowing the same direction.

Take two magnets with like poles facing upwards, now no matter which way you face them in parallel they repel each other. They don't attract each other. They will only attract if one pole is reversed from the other, and that means facing down and only down and away from the other magnetic field. The drawings being used in this video show both poles in the same direction, this represents two like poles facing the same way.

If you have two like poles the wires repel each other, not attract each other. In the video he claims the wires are attracted to each other.
Am I missing something here? I'd hate to be doing this once more. https://markitgroupmedia.files.wordp.../dunce-cap.png
__________________
 

Last edited by Gambeir; 05-05-2017 at 03:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-05-2017, 02:04 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
I don't intend to get involved in this thread. BM, the OP, has said in the first post that he's not wanting truth and facts here,

bi
That is not what was said at all. I can even tolerate a lie such as yours.
All I ask is that if you are going to loose your temper and make constant
bad or negative remarks with no real data for experimental evidence to
delete your bad words.

It is understandable that people feel sorry for themselves when they
have no way of forcing a message then begin to loose grip. What I am
asking us all to do is to grow beyond this cause and effect tantrum.

Facts are facts and are relevant to the application or context.

Be more explicit and the post you enter should back up your claim when
you are at the same time calling me a liar. To you it may seem that I have
lied and I may be unaware that I did it.

So please be kind and patient with each other. Each man has the right to
have his "say so" but force and intimidation usage, for instance something
used at the university level, used as a follow up to press the point, will
be corrected.

Such as you are doing right now and either do not care or do not see
what you are doing. Use terminology such as "IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING"
or "it is my belief" when starting a sentence claiming anything.

Be kind not oppressive and forceful.

We need some new fresh horses, ones that point out all the details
from start to finish without using that condescending tone.

If you are out of time and out of breath in bewilderment to get
everyone to see things your way, maybe you are trying to hard.



-----------------------------------------------------
__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 05-05-2017 at 06:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-05-2017, 03:24 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 929
no lies

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroMikey View Post
That is not what was said at all. I can even tolerate a lie such as yours.
I did not lie. I simply stated my opinion. Here is what you said/wrote and then me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroMikey View Post
We can not continue on the same path of current energy models listed in
our books, that are as old as 150 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
the OP, has said in the first post that he's not wanting truth and facts here,
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroMikey View Post
This thread is in favor of
looking at the limitless energy available, not why it is impossible to
even suggest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
just the infinite energy which he knows is there.
Think and say what you will. I'm out of it.

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-05-2017, 03:39 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diplomacy View Post
I took his post to mean "5 watt hours of power every time the electromagnet is fired up".

Making such a magnetic field conventionally I think is obviously not practical, but this doesn't seem to be a place for the conventional and the Tesla pancake style coils show promise.

In either case I am here to learn and discuss, please forgive any mistakes.
@Diplomacy,

That's right! Bistander can't understand that. That power would consolidate into high volt high amp pulse that would sustain the Tesla field for perhaps a second and need to be repeated serially to maintain it. A second look at the equations will reveal a proportion of WH/Sec.

Ampere's force law is Ampere per second to gauss
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-05-2017 at 04:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-05-2017, 04:12 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroMikey View Post

much energy a magnet has whether it be in more than one form.
Forms of electricity or in the form of FLUX.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5pZZJ23rDM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72pjGA-1EuI


Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-05-2017, 04:24 PM
Diplomacy Diplomacy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Burgess View Post
@Diplomacy,

That's right! Bistander can't understand that. That power would consolidate into high volt high amp pulse that would sustain the Tesla field for perhaps a second and need to be repeated serially to maintain it.
I think it is counter intuitive to describe it in such a way to a classically trained person and can see how it would cause frustration.

Watt hours are a measure of energy expended over time so when you say "5 watt hours" a classically trained person will think of it in terms of "5 watts for an hour" and be entirely reasonable in doing so.

I think a big part of the suppression of these various technologies has been in sculpting academic language in such a way that makes discourse on the subject difficult; we should all be on the same team, trying to free our people from the tyranny of those who want to keep them as slaves, getting on the same page with terms and definitions is a part of that.

Not trying to be critical, just trying to share what I think could be leading Bistander to be irritated with you; this forum is an amazing place and understanding each other better will make learning go better for all of us.

Back to the topic at hand, I don't think a magnet is actually an energy source at all, rather a lens through which the aether is pinched/twisted, the only "energy" stored in a magnet is whatever latent heat exists within its mass. Energy put into a permanent magnet upon it being made is just biasing the internal structure, once that structure is built it is happy to sit there.

Consider what conditions kill or alter a permanent magnet , a hard blow, heat, a stronger magnetic field, all of these are merely just changing the internal alignment.

These findings are along a similar vein I think:

https://phys.org/news/2017-01-metal-electricity.html

>There's a known rule-breaker among materials, and a new discovery by an international team of scientists adds more evidence to back up the metal's nonconformist reputation. According to a new study led by scientists at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and at the University of California, Berkeley, electrons in vanadium dioxide can conduct electricity without conducting heat.

Somehow a condition is created that allows the flow of one component of energy and not the others, differentiating the aether.
__________________
 

Last edited by Diplomacy; 05-05-2017 at 04:41 PM. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-05-2017, 05:10 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 929
To Gambeir

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gambeir View Post
I got some issues here with this video. What they don't tell you about Left hand and Right hand rules is the history behind those ideas and which have now produced confusion about polarity charges and their direction of flow, and which originated with ideas about whether a positive was ground or a negative was ground. So you have to be aware that a right hand rule can be applied to a negative polarity. The way to determine which is which is to look at the ground. Be aware of this historical fact. Not many places tell you about this historical screw up: Triva I ran in to while examining the rule.

* There is no law which says that the right hand rule is only applied to a positive charge. That only happens to be the way it's applied in our time. Not how it was applied at a previous time.

Now I know that I don't know anything about electronics and electrical theory, but while the theory may be correctly stated, it doesn't actually work that way. Not unless electrical magnetism is different somehow.

How many people have actually taken two magnets and followed along with the ideas presented in the video? I have and it doesn't work. The drawings of the current flows in the video are both flowing the same direction.

Take two magnets with like poles facing upwards, now no matter which way you face them in parallel they repel each other. They don't attract each other. They will only attract if one pole is reversed from the other, and that means facing down and only down and away from the other magnetic field. The drawings being used in this video show both poles in the same direction, this represents two like poles facing the same way.

If you have two like poles the wires repel each other, not attract each other. In the video he claims the wires are attracted to each other.
Am I missing something here? I'd hate to be doing this once more. https://markitgroupmedia.files.wordp.../dunce-cap.png
Hi Gambeir,

Quote:
Am I missing something here?
Although I do not wish to participate in this thread, you compose a reasonable question which I doubt will be addressed by the OP. So yes, you miss the fact that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the current. So the two parallel wires both carrying current in the same direction do not have magnetic "poles" pointed in the same direction. The magnetic field produced by the current in the wire circles the wire and is convergent meaning the lines of force close on themselves. So it is difficult to identify N and S poles in this case.

I hope that helps. Back to the sidelines.

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-05-2017, 05:18 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Rat Maze

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diplomacy View Post
I think it is counter intuitive to describe it in such a way to a classically trained person and can see how it would cause frustration.

Watt hours are a measure of energy expended over time so when you say "5 watt hours" a classically trained person will think of it in terms of "5 watts for an hour" and be entirely reasonable in doing so.

I think a big part of the suppression of these various technologies has been in sculpting academic language in such a way that makes discourse on the subject difficult; we should all be on the same team, trying to free our people from the tyranny of those who want to keep them as slaves, getting on the same page with terms and definitions is a part of that.

Not trying to be critical, just trying to share what I think could be leading Bistander to be irritated with you; this forum is an amazing place and understanding each other better will make learning go better for all of us.

Back to the topic at hand, I don't think a magnet is actually an energy source at all, rather a lens through which the aether is pinched/twisted, the only "energy" stored in a magnet is whatever latent heat exists within its mass. Energy put into a permanent magnet upon it being made is just biasing the internal structure, once that structure is built it is happy to sit there.

Consider what conditions kill or alter a permanent magnet , a hard blow, heat, a stronger magnetic field, all of these are merely just changing the internal alignment.

These findings are along a similar vein I think:

https://phys.org/news/2017-01-metal-electricity.html

>There's a known rule-breaker among materials, and a new discovery by an international team of scientists adds more evidence to back up the metal's nonconformist reputation. According to a new study led by scientists at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and at the University of California, Berkeley, electrons in vanadium dioxide can conduct electricity without conducting heat.

Somehow a condition is created that allows the flow of one component of energy and not the others, differentiating the aether.
@Diplomacy,

I've been out foxing four know it all "Flat Nose Maze Mice" since Easter. Inductance is a limited area like Trigonometry. Current density is current intensity. Ampere worked his equivalency theory out with Gauss, then Maxwell refined it to include current displacement (A.C.) RMS cosine values, simplified by Heaviside; then Biot-Savart plate charge "Charge equals Flux" in capacitors, then Lorentz and the electron in a magnetic field in free space then Einstein.

I challenged these heavey weights first on he Overunity site, then back here on Energetic Forum, not as a nice guy, but to repay them for insulting me over a discharge curve comparison. None of them; bistander, Milehigh Tinselkoala nor Citfta can read or understand the algebraic expressions commonly used in our inductance formulas. They're all completely ignorant in the field of Physics. All these men were Physicists: Oersted, Ampere, Gauss, Maxwell, Heaviside, Biot-Savart, Lorentz, Joseph Henry, Nicola Tesla and Albert Einstein etc. These electronics "Scope Gadgeteers" never signed up for one Physics course between the lot. Physicists have no need for Oscilloscopes.

I set out to make that group of "Thamsanka Wizards" look like a pack of chumps. I have a Milehigh decal painted on my cowling at this time.
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-05-2017 at 05:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-05-2017, 05:54 PM
Gambeir's Avatar
Gambeir Gambeir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Peoples republic of Washington
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Hi Gambeir,



Although I do not wish to participate in this thread, you compose a reasonable question which I doubt will be addressed by the OP. So yes, you miss the fact that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the current. So the two parallel wires both carrying current in the same direction do not have magnetic "poles" pointed in the same direction. The magnetic field produced by the current in the wire circles the wire and is convergent meaning the lines of force close on themselves. So it is difficult to identify N and S poles in this case.

I hope that helps. Back to the sidelines.

bi
Yes it does and thanks for explaining that. Obviously this thread is outside of my knowledge and I also have no means to contribute to it, but it seemed to not make sense at the moment, still wouldn't if you hadn't taken a second to instruct me. Once I think about what electromagnetic force should be created by another moving field then it makes sense. Opp's.
I appreciate your reply.
__________________
 

Last edited by Gambeir; 05-05-2017 at 06:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-05-2017, 07:25 PM
citfta citfta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,239
Gambeir,

There is a thread here for open discussion about projects on this forum. It is also sometimes used for electronic discussion and questions. If you want to ask any questions about electronics feel free to ask in that thread. It is for actual technical discussions that would interfere with the focus of other threads.

Carroll
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-06-2017, 02:24 AM
padova padova is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 26
Hallo BroMikey

As an addition to this topic I would mention late Mr Howard Johnson and his
work on permanent magnets. Very interesting, at least it was for me.
That's dvd number 4 from series "Enegy from the Vacuum."
Very informative. I saw some parts here and there on the Internet.
There is a book also from him.
Also very interesting man Howard Johnson.

One link: Howard Johnson
__________________
 

Last edited by padova; 05-06-2017 at 02:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-06-2017, 02:51 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by padova View Post
Hallo BroMikey

As an addition to this topic I would mention late Mr Howard Johnson and his
work on permanent magnets. Very interesting, at least it was for me.
That's dvd number 4 from series "Energy from the Vacuum."
Very informative. I saw some parts here and there on the Internet.
There is a book also from him.
Also very interesting man Howard Johnson.
Hello Padova

Good to point out Howie sure gave the world much to go on as his
work was passed to John bedini and further explored. I heard the magnets
shuffling back and forth on one of Peter L. SSG where he had experimented
with the flipping polarity magnet stacks.

Or making mechanical gates you might call it. Other have also shown a
wide range of magnetic engine work pointing to keys that could be
merged with motor generators.

The energy potential redirected at the Bloch Wall comes from the Aether
I would imagine. A number of magnetic engines prove just how much
energy is available to us. As big as you can build for as much as you
could ever possibly want but practical models must first be developed.

Not everyone has the capacity to develop a practical breakthrough.

Howard died before he finished.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-06-2017, 06:14 AM
padova padova is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 26
In part of the the video I saw, no mention of Aether, it say that is
from inner structure of the magnet. But I don't have all informations.
He worked on that very extensively
and have some patents. Very scientific thing.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-06-2017, 06:44 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
I was not very complete, let me show you John Bedini's way
of looking at energy in a magnet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYaS9xCeNJE
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-06-2017, 06:50 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,820
Yet another complete picture. Here is his idea.
Others say the opposite.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw1M3LbzGlY

----------------------------------------------------------

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-06-2017, 11:14 PM
Allen Burgess Allen Burgess is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,436
Ampere's Force law

From Ampere’s law, it can be derived that the field inside a coil of wire is described as: Formula attached below:

Basically Amperes force law; Current in Amps divided into turns per meter of wire equals magnet field strength in Gauss.

3600 Joules per second would generate 1 Tesla of field strength in an inductor of 1 Henry of inductance.

where:
• B = the magnetic field strength at the center, in Tesla (10,000 Gauss = 1 Tesla)
• µo = a constant, the magnetic permeability of free space, 4π×10−7 N·A−2
• k = a constant, the magnetic permeability of the core material. Iron = 5000, Steel = 100, Air = 1.
• N / L = number of turns per length of the core/shaft, expressed in turns per meter
• I = current flowing through the wire, expressed in Amps
__________________
 

Last edited by Allen Burgess; 05-08-2017 at 07:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
energy, views, magnet, thread, limitless, properly, step, books, place, form, alternative, impossible, suggest, view, received, presenting, debunked, key, guidelines, taught, supply, decades, inventors, met, places

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers