![]() |
|
Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here. |
* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#241
|
||||
|
||||
Free energy wheel charges cell phone, hum...............
__________________
|
|
#242
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
1) Option /This option is the most controversial. It is the first formula that operates in the dispute about the flywheel, the second is given when studying the mechanics of motors./ Centrifugal force (in Newtons) = flywheel mass (kg) multiplied by its flywheel speed (angular velocity, meters per second) per square, and this is divided by the total flywheel radius (in meters). Calculate the rotational moment on the flywheel shaft, again according to the known formula: Rotational torque (Nm) = Centrifugal force (in Newtons) multiplied by the flywheel radius (in meters) 2) Option /classic version/ Torque Formula (Moment of Inertia and Angular Acceleration) In my opinion, as it were, it is necessary to learn how to manage it.
__________________
Last edited by Rakarskiy; 09-11-2018 at 05:32 PM. |
#243
|
|||
|
|||
Hi BroMikey, you are right, this generator must be a magnets modified one. I made a similar set up with a normal generator and Lenz-cogging destroys it soon. No jokes with Mr.Lenz-cogging, trucks use it as brake.
So basically there are two tipes of flywheel generators: 1-Unmodified generators with unbalanced flywheel to break the Lenz-cogging. 2-Modified generators with little Lenz-cogging and a balanced flywheel acting mainly as an energy storage.
__________________
|
#244
|
|||
|
|||
Lenz? What is a generator brake?
The stator is wound in a closed loop, and the stator, wound by the "wave", the brake is exactly the same. A magnet inserted into an open ring does not repel, so the wave coil should not slow down, does it. Even at idle, the generator has a deceleration degree when there is no EMF in the windings. So, how does the Lenz affect the generator brake?
__________________
Last edited by Rakarskiy; 09-12-2018 at 08:24 AM. |
#245
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
and two 20hp motors and two 100hp motors Thx for the chime in, clears up things for ![]()
__________________
|
#246
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
|
#247
|
|||
|
|||
Some generators have Lenze cogging when the coils are shorted, and some may have ferro type cogging even when they are not under load, to me that sounds like double trouble. Generators can at least just avoid the ferro cogging even though they have powerful magnets and steel or iron, that much is just in the design.
A few small steps can tip the scales. Edit I forgot to mention about using dc motors as the prime mover. 'when the output of the captured power from the collapsing magnetic field is captured, tuning the circuit for maximum impedance matching does make a big difference. Can be done quite easily with off the shelf motors.
__________________
Last edited by lotec; 09-16-2018 at 09:56 AM. |
#248
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
#249
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
and disconnecting windings with an off the shelf motor. ![]()
__________________
|
#250
|
|||
|
|||
Hi
Thanks for asking. What I meant about impedance matching is, that if the output voltage is too low, then there won't be enough electromotive force to push the amperage to where it needs to go, and if it is too high then useful amperage is being unecessarily sacrificed for voltage that may not be particularly useful. My observations were made in the context of using the motor itself as the target destination for the output, ie feedback. In the circuit below, I opted for a high side switch, to prevent the motor coil from discharging in series with the battery, to keep the voltage down, and avoid confusion as to where the feedback power was coming from. I used a fixed duty cycle of 50%, knowing that the optimum frequency is going to produce the optimum on time for the motor inductor for feeding it's target destination. R1 is for measuring the current in from the battery and R2 is for measuring the amount of current being fed back into the motor. I started with a very low frequency of about 100 Hz, then started to walk through the frequencies. As the optimum frequency is reached input current starts to drop off quite noticeably and the output current rises quite noticeably as well. When the input is at it's lowest and the output at it's highest then it is tuned. The motor also had a surprising amount of torque as well. Those are the upsides to the situation, but the downside is that once finding the optimum on time for the target destination, if the off time is lowered, thereby increasing the duty cycle, then the amperage recovery declines. It seems to need the full 50 % off time to recover the full amount of amperage. Maybe this has something to do with amperage lagging. The motor doesn't spin as fast as if it has 100% duty cycle, but I think that the added torque and lower current draw and efficiency make up for that. I was only using a small slotcar motor with permanent magnets, but am optimistic that this effect can be scaled up. It may be useful for other types of target destinations that use amperage as well. I think it could be worth looking into. There are definite advantages to doing this, as opposed to just randomly selecting a frequency to pulse the motor at. After the circuit is tuned this way, the 0.1 Ohm resisters can come out, but it's kind of fun to leave them in and see just how much amperage is being fed back in, when the motor is under different degrees of load. cheers
__________________
|
#251
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks for the interest. Yes, pretty much so I think. The generator part of my last post didn't come across the way I intended, and when I wrote it, I had a small dc motor with powerful pm''s in mind as the generator. I am reluctant to use it as a generator because of how hard it is to turn, even when no power is being taken from it. My thoughts were that if that type of drag were eliminated then, that would be a step in the right direction for me. Nothing very profound about that statement, in hindsight , I probably shouldn't have posted that. I liked your idea of pulsing stater winding's in some motors, maybe they could be impedance matched and fed back on themselves too. Free magnetism. waste not. want not. cheers,
__________________
|
#252
|
||||
|
||||
Free Energy Motor that generates 2.4v
__________________
|
#253
|
|||
|
|||
Pay attention to the flywheel
Pay attention to the flywheel
__________________
|
#254
|
||||
|
||||
He is powering a grinder off of his little motor running the special
flywheel connected to the big big permanent magnet generator. The question is "What does the special flywheel do?" It has an outer ring on a small clutch to pull it along with the inter. Thx 4 the vid. ![]()
__________________
|
#255
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
|
#256
|
||||
|
||||
It is jumping around in the center section breaking the magnetic lock
and therefore getting around Lenz Law. Lenz free jerking. ![]()
__________________
|
#257
|
|||
|
|||
The invention of Peruvian Fernando Ramos Sixto Solano, who created the Force Multiplier System
http://quanthomme.free.fr/qhsuite/20...oRamosDoc1.pdf ![]() ![]() The scientific justification of the Kapitza-Stephenson pendulum and the Chelomei pendulum
__________________
|
#258
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Me English ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Last edited by BroMikey; 09-26-2018 at 10:22 PM. |
#259
|
||||
|
||||
A sort of jiggly crank shaft wobbling. Shaking out free energy.
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
#260
|
|||
|
|||
In general, it does not shake, it's an inverted pendulum. And he has quite a scientific justification. The Kapitsa pendulum.
Quote:
![]() ?????????? ????????? ? ???????? 4
__________________
|
#261
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Last edited by BroMikey; 09-28-2018 at 10:16 AM. |
#262
|
|||
|
|||
Kapitsa, a scientist and he is interested in the effect. Peruvian "this flywheel" in the form of a lever with a load, fixed rigidly, which creates a variable torque, rotating in different directions of the two flywheels.
__________________
|
#263
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
|
#264
|
|||
|
|||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMBZB3dVgtc Quote:
__________________
|
#265
|
||||
|
||||
That is a good idea, I like that. A tire could hold heavy fluids and
at the same time balance out some of the load yet still be a cheap price for materials.
__________________
|
#266
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
|
#267
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
|
#268
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
Last edited by Rakarskiy; 11-02-2018 at 05:53 PM. |
#269
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, generator design is so important in that cogging could be
eliminated but I am not sure what this one hold yet. I'll look it over close to see. Anymore info is needed. Thank you for your kind regard. ![]()
__________________
|
#270
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
|
![]() |
Tags |
energy, free, motor, electricity, imanes, generator, magnet, renewable, gravity, electric, power, magnets, force, kinetic, electrical, speed, electromagnetic, motors, generators, body, object, rest, news, relativity, mechanics |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Please
consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription. For one-time donations, please use the below button. |