Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Sponsored by Teslacoin Foundation

Teslacoin Foundation

https://www.tesla-coin.com/inventorshome/


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-23-2014, 04:11 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Based upon 10 years of research and finding a few of the last remaining LINKS in the puzzle from Eric P Dollard,

I will be done in less than a week.

When I upload the 92+ PAGE article (with many original diagrams) to the website,


*EDIT, DONE.

Done, BOOK uploaded, 110 pages


2 sizes, small and large (one reduced in image optimization)


www.kathodos.com/magnetism1.pdf 67.9 MB PDF

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf 13.4 MB PDF


Page 30 begins the description of magnetism.


Yes, there is much repetition at times, but this full work is meant as a prequel to a 250+ page book.


Enjoy

I will give everyone here a link to the book, IT IS FREE

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism

Exploring the nature of Magnetism, with regards to the true model of atomic geometry and field mechanics by means of rational physics & logic

ISBN 0-9712541-8-4





I have been killing myself to finish the work, all the original diagrams, and digital validations, and experiments with pyrol. graphite, and my own special creation of ferrofluid, and checking and rechecking.


Owning every book ever published on earth on Magnetism and having 100% FREE time for the past 14 years, and having a lifetime devotion to uncovering magnetism, ....


I dont say casually that I am certain you will be stunned with the results / information.


Hope you enjoy it.
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-30-2014 at 11:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 06-23-2014, 12:40 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 786
Thanks for the update Ken. Very much looking forward to it.
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2014, 06:32 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
Thanks for the update Ken. Very much looking forward to it.
Bob

Thanks, .....Ive been upset for 20+ years owning every book ever made about magnets and magnetism, ...they are all literally trash.

nonsensical reifications , either atomistic, or illogical twaddle on par with new-age tinfoil hat crypto-mysticism and then there is the Cult of Quantum's position.

Feynmans "virtual photon" twaddle. GR and QM shudder when the word FIELD is mentioned.

GR and QM are no different than ancient Greek Atomism actually.


unfortunately...... "modern humanity has replaced one kind of magic for another kind, more convoluted but the same frequency of crazy" - Jennings.


The term magnet itself is the ROOT of the term magic.

This history of magnetism is the very likely to be sure the origin of the premise of ‘magic’ itself; these histories of magic, based on the Hermetic tradition, suggest that knowledge of the magnet originated with the Magi, plural of magh, or magus, who were the first to discover its attraction for loadstone iron. Consequently, the “magical” loadstones were named in their honor. The word magnet deriving from the Sanskrit root word, mahaji, meaning the great or wise, but specifically meaning “has magic” (in ancient days wisdom was magic and vice versa). The Egyptians believed the sky to be made of iron or steel, namely obviously due to iron meteorites; hence the name for iron, metal of heaven. Meteoritic iron, which is, early on, famous from loadstones with their “magical attraction”.

“Why the Heraclean stone attracts iron. Empedocles says that the iron is borne towards the stone by the effluvia emanating from both and because the pores of the stone are fitted to receive the effluvium of the iron. The effluvium of the stone then expels the air from the pores of the iron. Once the air is expelled, the iron itself is carried along by the abundant flow of the effluvium. Again, when the effluvium of the iron moves towards the pores of the stone, which are fitted to receive it, the iron begins to move with it.” - Empedocles of Akragas (491-435B.C.) (from the second hand account of Alexander of Aphrodisias who paraphrases Empedocles theory.)

As today, there are only two explanations for magnetism, one materialistic and mechanical (as above, evoking particles, nonsense), and the other immaterial, based in fields, the Ether (Platonic and Pythagorean in nature). This Atomistic / materialistic insanity contrasts with the Thalean theory, which attributes the attraction to a non-materialistic, hidden, and immaterial cause, or mediator. As was in ancient times so it is today, that these two views constitute the two main positions used to construct theories of electricity and magnetism throughout the “prescientific” and “scientific” (irrational) eras. All the theories constructed since the days of the ancients can be classified as either materialistic, based on the action of effluvia in the form of tiny insensible particles (same as the nonsense of GR and QM today), or as non-material fields, and forces of attraction that acts at a distance across the intervening space and vacuum.

Another ancient materialistic view of magnetism: “Democritus also says that there are effluences and that like bodies are attracted to like, but adds that all are attracted to a void. Having made these hypotheses, he supposes that the loadstone and iron consist of similar atoms, but those of stone are smaller and it is of some rarer texture than the iron and contains more void. For this reason, its atoms being more mobile are attracted more quickly to the iron (for they are moving to their similars), and entering the pores of the iron disturb the atoms in it as they pass between owing to their small size. The atoms of the iron, thus disturbed, stream outside towards the stone because of their similarity and because it has more void. The iron [as a whole] follows them in their wholesale expulsion and movement and is itself drawn towards the stone. the reason why the stone does not move any more towards the iron is that the iron does not contain so much void.” – Democritus (according to Alexander of Aphrodisias who is source on this subject)



That of course was just a touch of history, which in NO WAY explains magnetism, but an interesting look back........way back !
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-23-2014 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2014, 06:34 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
Will the book include the history of magnetism?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2014, 07:57 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
Will the book include the history of magnetism?
This first edition is only a very tiny section on the history, less than a page.


You can get the HISTORY of magnetism anywhere,

The "how / why/ what" of what magnetism is, how it works..........that missing section (the only important section) is the only real point of focus.

Additionally included is a 4 page section on the missing geometry of light with rational, logical explanations

additionally a correction of the photoelectric effect and its fallacy in presuming the chain of causation from Xray / gamma charge from coincidental light on a charging vacuum plate.

bit of humor:-----



__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-24-2014, 10:09 AM
LutherG's Avatar
LutherG LutherG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 91
Hello TheoriaApophasis,

Thank you for all the work you've done and for your kind gesture in sharing it with us! I can hardly wait to read what you've sorted out!

Best regards,

Luther
__________________
Electrostatic charges manipulating magneto-gravitic streams...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2014, 03:12 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,507
I too appreciate your willingness to share and your dedication to the research.

Dave
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2014, 05:08 PM
ewizard's Avatar
ewizard ewizard is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outside the Matrix
Posts: 1,109
Thank you for sharing this! It has always seemed a misty mystery surrounding what magnetism really is to me. Sure we know some of it's properties but what really explains it has seemed lacking.

Based on your research do you believe it is possible to build a device that can generate power with magnets (essentially free energy from magnetism) ?
__________________
There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-24-2014, 05:42 PM
Stealth Stealth is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 533
Good News

This is certainly exiting news. I once spent an entire year doing all sorts of experiments with magnets. I recorded all the experiments and fashioned them into a book. I learned more about magnetism that year than I would ever have learned reading books or searching the internet. The reason I did it was that the information I wanted was not on the internet or recorded in any book. I have several books that I bought and found they only contained general or sketchy information at best. My tests and experimental are not technical, in any sense of the word, but they only present the facts of my experiments. I look forward to your book and hopefully it may shed light on my own facts I derived from my experiments. Good Luck. stealth
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-24-2014, 08:28 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewizard View Post
Thank you for sharing this! It has always seemed a misty mystery surrounding what magnetism really is to me. Sure we know some of it's properties but what really explains it has seemed lacking.

Based on your research do you believe it is possible to build a device that can generate power with magnets (essentially free energy from magnetism) ?


Kind regards, I should be done within 2 days.


My main trade is translating ancient Greek texts, writing books, however I have always been an inventor and vociferous explorer of unknown (rather not understood) natural phenomena.

I think for my 14th (?) birthday I asked for a Dewar tank and a superconductor Yttrium barium oxide disk and magnet set.


While others try to "squeeze their nonsense" into a "consistent pile of illogical twaddle" (consistent, yet insane, ..illogical) This model of magnetism HAS, and DOES fit the criterion below, ......and of this I am greatly proud to have had enormous free time to experiment, study study study........most of my life without burdens, etc and likewise...


1. Divinely simple

2. Rational

3. Logical

4. Demonstrable to a child

5. Self-consistent

6. Euclidean demonstrably both electrically and magnetically

7. Fit ALL observed phenomena

8. Fit Ockham’s razor analogously

9. Rather than offend the common sense of a even fool like GR and QM does by evoking “virtual photons” and quantum insane hypothetical concept-reifications, the model and explanations must be:
A: necessitated
B: provable
D: explicitly demonstrable
E: undeniably simplex and self-consistent on all levels.





As is the case, I own ALL books on magnetism, most are professional written, ARE consistent, ........... however all are both insane and illogical in their conclusions, and rationally farcical at best usually.

So many "deep thinking but insane" peoples, alas.

which leads to................


“Scientists today think deeply rather than clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane. Todays scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander thru equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no basis in reality.” – Nikola Tesla
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-24-2014 at 08:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-25-2014, 01:19 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
This first edition is only a very tiny section on the history, less than a page.
That's what I was hoping you'd say. Too many books these days seem to be full of needless filler. Even Dollard's Four Quadrant Representation book seemed to have too much fluff for my taste.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 06-25-2014, 06:32 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Done, BOOK uploaded, 99 pages


2 sizes, small and large (one reduced in image optimization)


www.kathodos.com/magnetism1.pdf 67.9 MB PDF

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf 13.4 MB PDF


Page 30 begins the description of magnetism.


Yes, there is much repetition at times, but this full work is meant as a prequel to a 250+ page book.


Enjoy
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-26-2014, 10:22 PM
john_g john_g is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Thanks

Hi TheoriaApophasis (Ken)

Many thanks for the book - very generous of you. I've just starting to read it and looking forward to gaining new knowledge.

Kind regards

John
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-26-2014, 11:48 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Kind regards to yourself, John.

Understood. Its just the first edition, ...it is complete as it is however.


I however am working on a 5 page extension of it entitled "Forces, Tension, and Induction"

(and ultimately another 30+ pages on Field Incommensurability , Field-charge induction geometry, and action at a distance field pressure mediation)



Fields and induction are circular paradoxes in the telling, from the "cult of Quantum"

If you research induction, they will tell you research fields, and when you research fields, they will tell you its a "force which is an induction'.


Idiocy A leads to idiocy B leads to idiocy C !

It is far far wiser for someone to say "I don't know (we don't know)" than to employ conceptual reifications of fields with "forces" and "induction", and never explain any of them, whatsoever.


"Descriptions, descriptions, descriptions everywhere! But not an explanation to be found!" - Author.

Lux et Veritas



Of course, we could all just nod our heads in agreement with Ricky Feynman (as I call him) and say its all done "by virtual photons"; but then some of us are a bit more evolved than to come to such fantastical pseudo-mystical pontifications.
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-26-2014 at 11:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-29-2014, 01:33 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth View Post
This is certainly exiting news. I once spent an entire year doing all sorts of experiments with magnets
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
Now you've got my interest!

Pardon, but after much coaxing from friends that I include the magnetic precession ratios, and angles in the first edition, I cranked out 10 more pages.


They implored me that understanding magneto-dielectric geometry utterly NECESSITATES elaboration on magnetic precession.

In hindsight, they're correct. However I had planned on including that much later, I had to triple check my math , and made 5 more diagrams and detailed descriptions about same,


110 PAGES, and the same links as above, but including the 10 page section:


Magnetic precession rates of the gyromagnetic-ratio at 42.4923 Mhz/T in creating the magnetic vortex
Precessional (vortex) Geometry is also Phi-Phi-1Precession



__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-29-2014, 09:48 PM
Hrothgar's Avatar
Hrothgar Hrothgar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 265
Send a message via Yahoo to Hrothgar Send a message via Skype™ to Hrothgar
Trouble in paradise

I can't finish the downloads the large one stops at 13.4meg and the small one stops at 12meg. they both act as though they have completed by dropping the .part file.
__________________
 

Last edited by Hrothgar; 06-29-2014 at 09:48 PM. Reason: misspelled word
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-29-2014, 10:42 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hrothgar View Post
I can't finish the downloads the large one stops at 13.4meg and the small one stops at 12meg. they both act as though they have completed by dropping the .part file.
The issue is at YOUR end.

Do NOT OPEN the link, right click then "save link as"


Just tested BOTH for download a second ago.................., all works fine.


OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:

http://kickass.to/uncovering-the-mis...-t9272462.html


YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...etismsmall.pdf




__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-29-2014 at 10:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-30-2014, 03:28 PM
wattsup wattsup is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 16
@TheoriaApophasis

I sent you a PM.

Thanks.

wattsup
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-30-2014, 05:08 PM
ewizard's Avatar
ewizard ewizard is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outside the Matrix
Posts: 1,109
TheoriaApophasis, Thanks again for all your work on this and the additional info. So far everyone I've seen has had some trouble downloading it (talk on another forum). I tried it myself and it erred out many times but with the browser I use (opera) I was able to 'resume' it each time until it finished. So if people can't get it with their current browser grab opera (best browser IMO - been using it over 20 years!) from Opera browser - The alternative web browser - Download free and give it a go. If it stops just click on the downloads tab and then right click on the download and choose 'Resume'.

Thanks for your response to my first post but I think I missed an answer in there. Just asking for your opinion : Do you think one can make a free energy generator based on magnets?
__________________
There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

Last edited by ewizard; 06-30-2014 at 05:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-30-2014, 06:11 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewizard View Post
TheoriaApophasis, Thanks again for all your work on this and the additional info. So far everyone I've seen has had some trouble downloading it (talk on another forum). I tried it myself and it erred out many times but with the browser I use (opera) I was able to 'resume' it each time until it finished. So if people can't get it with their current browser grab opera (best browser IMO - been using it over 20 years!) from Opera browser - The alternative web browser - Download free and give it a go. If it stops just click on the downloads tab and then right click on the download and choose 'Resume'.

Thanks for your response to my first post but I think I missed an answer in there. Just asking for your opinion : Do you think one can make a free energy generator based on magnets?


I have called 2 other contacts.......they report downloading both links without any trouble.


Just tested BOTH for download a second ago (yet again)................., all works fine.

OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:

http://kickass.to/uncovering-the-mis...-t9272462.html


YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...etismsmall.pdf

I have downloaded both links remotely off Safari, Firefox and Chrome without any issue.

do NOT OPEN the links, rather "right click" and "save link as"

I have much experience with PDF, and this is always the recommended methodology.



~~~~~~~ Just asking for your opinion : Do you think one can make a free energy generator based on magnets?



Magnetism being a spatial polarized radiation of either electricity in termination, or the inter-atomic volume from proton spin, one of the few plausible methods of 'extracting' movement would be a centrifugal capture supra-diamagnetic device.

Contrary to "nature abhors a vacuum" the case is that "nature abhors pressure gradients" ...

ultimately meaning that, as is currently the case, one requires a prime mover of a polarized field against a dielectric barrier = electrification. Be that wind, nuclear, etc etc.


There is ONE option which needs to be explored that a ratio of 1 to Phi counter-precession at an input of 1 with a resultant output of (at or near) Phi (1.618033) is possible from magnets.

Such a device would only require a small input of counter-precession to the centrifugal field yielding ~1.5-~1.6X output.

So, in short, no. But in specific YES, knowing how to create precession (and therefore movement) at a rate much greater than the input counter-precession, it is possible.

Other possibilities, logically so, exist, but are not known (well, a few are but need to be tested).


The premise for the article was understanding the nature of same, rather than any premise for free energy extraction.


Some people focus on the "WHAT"......... I would let others focus on the "HOW (to use this information to......)".
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-01-2014, 02:52 PM
Hrothgar's Avatar
Hrothgar Hrothgar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 265
Send a message via Yahoo to Hrothgar Send a message via Skype™ to Hrothgar
Still reading

I'm up to page 91 and have noticed 2 errors. on page 69 the left most frame depicts a spiral vortex that is counter to your vortex description as it will sync in "N to N", "N to S" and "S to S". I altered the picture below to this to more accurately show compatible / incompatible vector.

Page 91 has a reference to ether as air as you have mentioned before but it has no quotes.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg vortex2.jpg (32.3 KB, 12 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by Hrothgar; 07-01-2014 at 04:17 PM. Reason: added pictures
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 07-01-2014, 03:09 PM
Hrothgar's Avatar
Hrothgar Hrothgar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 265
Send a message via Yahoo to Hrothgar Send a message via Skype™ to Hrothgar
I posted the file on Amule

I posted the 14meg version on Amule.TheoriaApophasis - Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism
__________________
 

Last edited by Hrothgar; 07-01-2014 at 04:18 PM. Reason: corrected spelling error
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-01-2014, 03:24 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 786
Here's a trick that might help when the download stops. For me, once the doc started downloading, I went to page one and then hit the bottom button on the page to scroll to the end of the doc. Each time it stopped, I scrolled back about 5 pages or so, and it re-started.

My computer crashed a few days ago due to another problem, so I'll have to download it again at some point.

Again, TheoA, thank you for your generosity. I'll put in a payment as soon as I get my computer back and can download it again.
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-01-2014, 04:55 PM
Hrothgar's Avatar
Hrothgar Hrothgar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 265
Send a message via Yahoo to Hrothgar Send a message via Skype™ to Hrothgar
finished skimming

On page 97 you ended the sentence centrifugally when I believe centrifugal may have been better grammatically.

A good read, except for all the angst. I hope you can see my point on the following sentences. Written word is not speech, as such it leaves emotional subtext almost entirely for the reader to determine. That said, you overtly insult and ridicule the seekers of knowledge for going to the shiniest beacons of "truth" which is a good portion of the audience you should be aiming your efforts to enlightening not bashing. You also bash early scientific minds for winning a popularity contest. Truth is only recognized when it is convenient or valuable to do so. Example Einstein didn't undo Tesla, J.P. Morgan did. Tesla also lost to himself, his AC power provided a tool of profit so grand that by the time he even thought of wardencliff it was too late. Einstein and the rest gave PRACTICAL understanding of manipulation, as such not truth but profitable. Your notable judgement of others leaves readers open to negative assumption of your personality which detracts from the truth presented. other than that cheers
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cetrifugal.jpg (24.5 KB, 16 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-01-2014, 05:36 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hrothgar View Post
I'm up to page 91 and have noticed 2 errors. on page 69 the left most frame depicts a spiral vortex that is counter to your vortex description as it will sync in "N to N", "N to S" and "S to S". I altered the picture below to this to more accurately show compatible / incompatible vector.
Page 91 has a reference to ether as air as you have mentioned before but it has no quotes.
No, it is that a 2D representation of a moving double reciprocating vortex is a near impossibility, that "interior view" is meant to show ONLY the dielectric inertial planes relative position to the double conjugating centrifugal and centripetal vortex.

You are correct that that VERY limited image is not the correct magnetic vortex accurately represented in 20+ other diagrams in the work.......however that is on purpose in intent; it is merely meant to demo the relative location of the inertial plane.

There is no "spiral (singular) vortex" in or OF any "magnet", that is why you incorrectly consider that very limited image as "incompatible"

There is 1. circular reciprocation both centrifugal then centripetal 2. magneto-dielectric field-precession (explained in detail) 3. radial centripetal inertial plane as the 'driver' of this conjugate system


Its rather that the image is (that one only) extremely limited.

diagrams focus in on certain aspects, and NOT every diagram illuminates everything going on AT ONCE. Doing same would be, logically, very difficult.
However all diagrams collectively paint the picture in full.

You misunderstand the quote on page 91... it is:
however there is “air” in the atomic ‘balloon’, and
that air is a conjugate pair of dielectric

This is an attack on the GR and QM establishment which claims 99.99999999999% of an atom is "empty, is nothing".


I only make an allusion to the "balloon model" OF THE ATOM in their senseless premise as being a "balloon that has no air" in it.

AS SUCH, i was not referring to the Ether directly or specifically, in that quote, rather to the magneto-dielectric volume in the inter-atomic as mediating and mediator of discharges and atomic orbital geometries as well as the "felly volume" of the precessing and charging nucleus.





Page 97 does contain an incomplete thought-sentence. Kinds regards in pointing out that error. I have fixed same. Always thinking 10 steps ahead has disadvantages in writing, a flaw that Plotinus had as well.

Kinds regards for pointing out that necessary correction where a thought was left 'dangling'.

Lux et Veritas
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-01-2014 at 06:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-01-2014, 05:39 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
Here's a trick that might help when the download stops. For me, once the doc started downloading, I went to page one and then hit the bottom button on the page to scroll to the end of the doc. Each time it stopped, I scrolled back about 5 pages or so, and it re-started.

Bob

Kind regards Bob, having and working with PDF now for countless years, the trick of ANY sizable PDF download is to NEVER click on the link rather..

"right click" then "save link as"

however better options exist here:

OTHER OPTION is a torrent download of the book here:

http://kickass.to/uncovering-the-mis...-t9272462.html


YET ANOTHER option is download from archive.org here:

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...etismsmall.pdf



I have other PDF works that are 1.2 Gigabyte PDF files, and to even dare think of opening them online is 100% impossible regardless of ones www connection. Always "save link as", never open them.


Kinds regards to you for same, Peace.


Lux et Veritas
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-01-2014, 09:22 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 786
Thanks TheoA,
I'll save it next time that way.

Phos aletheia
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-03-2014, 11:05 AM
abdlquadri abdlquadri is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 60
thanks

Thanks alot.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-04-2014, 02:32 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 786
Quote:
Source: TA in Exploring Spatial Energy Coherence
Space has NO ENERGY, Space has never done anything.

This notion that space is "something" or DOES SOMETHING is a mental brain wasting disease of Relativity and the Cult of Quantum

Space is an attribute of a field, to speak of "action/force" IN space, is only the wrong way of saying "the FIELD BOUNDARY..........did X"

There is space IN a field, but there is no field IN SPACE.

When you speak of 'space energy', you're only reifying field energy

I have nearly 100 pages to write on this fact, with mathematical proofs.

There is only ONE DIMENSION of Space
• Space raised to the positive exponent is simply called space (acre).
• Space raised to the negative exponent is called counter-space (per sq.
centimeter).
TA, looking forward to reading your book, particularly in light of these comments. I don't know whether you'd subscribe to them, but your stance vis a vis QM and Special Relativity seems consistent with what I've seen in the work of Robert Sungenis (anti-Copernican), with which I find myself sympathetic.

I couldn't help but see your logic in describing the aether or Stiffler's spatio-temporal lattice simply as field. It would seem to me that in this way, we have one pervasive energetic reality, perhaps with different gradations and expressions. Again, looking forward to reading what you have to say.
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-04-2014, 02:56 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
TA, looking forward to reading your book, particularly in light of these comments. I don't know whether you'd subscribe to them, but your stance vis a vis QM and Special Relativity seems consistent with what I've seen in the work of Robert Sungenis (anti-Copernican), with which I find myself sympathetic.

I will have a 3rd edition out in less than a month. Afterwords there are maybe 40+ pages to add with math and some finer more 'dry' points.


Two quotes from Dollard with 'corrections' (so to say) in parenthesis:

There is only ONE DIMENSION of Space *(within a field)
• Space *(CENTRIFUGAL FIELD) raised to the positive exponent is simply called space (acre).
• Space raised to the negative exponent is called counter-space *(CENTRIPETAL FIELD) (per sq.
centimeter).


Hence we have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time *(FIELD FLUX VARIATION...“OVER TIME”)
2) Space .....*(FIELD BARRIER, Ether pressure graidents)
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism

We can of course give definition TO space, but only as is meant an attribute WITHIN a field, AS a product of a field.

A field containing space is moving at a rate of change of the field as measured BY its attribute, space.


To speak otherwise is like saying There is light (field) expanding into/within illumination (nonsensical). Rather illumination is an attribute co-principle to and as light

Light,/EM , like magnetism itself being a radiation is expanding with its attributional 'field of illumination (space)'. We say we are 'in an illuminated space', when the proper causation would be that we are 'standing within the space of illumination (field)'

where ε0 is the permittivity of space, and μ0 is the permeability of space. Since none of the four Maxwell’s equations is defined to be a causal relation, and since each of these equations connects quantities simultaneous in time, none of these equations represents a causal relation. That is, ∇ · D is not a consequence of ρ (and vice versa),∇ Ĺ~E is not a consequence of ∂B/∂t (and vice versa), and∇ Ĺ~H is not a consequence of J + ∂D/∂t (and vice versa). Thus, Maxwell’s equations, even though they are basic electromagnetic equations (since most electromagnetic relations are derivable from them), do not depict cause-and-effect relations between electromagnetic reactions



I have about 100 pages to write on this WITH mathematical proofs, most of which come from OLEG JEFIMENKO himself. Too bad he died not too long ago.


How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown point, all of them pointing at a place I had never looked, I wasn't even looking for!,..... finally so many pointing fingers could not be ignored. There is no space outside of a field. It is impossible. Likewise therefore no time. Likewise therefore no inductions. Space is a property of a field, an attribute, but there are none, and never has there ever appeared ‘a field within ‘existing space’ ', because space is the effect, not the "medium" into which there is field expansion.

As is typical of GR and QM, they have been looking at the horses ass, rather than the in the horses mouth. When a field is present, then so too space, but not "a field expanding, contracting, interacting IN SPACE".

GR and QM have it backwards (as usual), they have reified SPACE as a 'thing' that 'does things'. Space has done nothing, never has done anything (as a principle or autonomous entity, since definitionally it has no such existence).


Us crazy humans cannot think this way since the entire world we live in is countless endless ocean of fields overlapping fields overlapping fields etc. Namely also, of course, since all matter itself are trillions of spheres of magneto-dielectric 'bubbles' in temporary equilibrium.


.....likewise GR and QM dismiss 'fields' as a principle of space (rather than a modality of the Ether/Aether).
To reify space is like saying "love attracts a rock".


There IS instant action at a distance regarding fields, because space-time does NOT exist outside of a field, space is effect WITHIN a field.

A field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.

Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').

As even Dollard admits, Ether always seeks self-voidance, ALWAYS, IN counterspace.



If, as is logically necessitated, space is merely an attribute of a field, then are we splitting hairs by saying someone is moving potato chips rather than moving french fries, since both are modalities of a POTATO. LOL.
They say specificity is divinity, and the clearer the better I suppose.


All radiation is spatial, all magnetism IS definitionally of course, pure termination of electricity, but always attributional TO a subject. Magnetism itself has no autonomous existence like dielectricty.
TEM, magnetism OF a mass "X", etc. Magnetism as co-principle of the universe, unlike dielectricity, cannot , does not exist as 'an island unto itself' Polarization OF magnetism IN/OF X, and thru X

.......This also explains Dollard many mention repeatedly of (NASA) seeing ONLY the sun and the earth FAR outside the field of the earth....but no stars.
No light far outside of earth, because no field = no space = no induction

Magnet is of course polarized, electrification isn’t caused by the magnetic field against a dielectric, BUT the moving space WITHIN that polarized field of the magnet against the dielectric that is causing electrification. People think the field is causing electrification, rather it’s the moving space causing inertial plane torque. Space has only one dimension as within a field, that space is moving (as meant WITHIN a field) is how energy is created, but moving space WITHIN a field. Spatial displacement against an inertial plane causes its torque/breaking. The limit of space is just the boundary-plane of ANY field.

We think of fields as the "breaks" upon the dielectric inertial plane which creates 'dielectric friction' which = electrification, but in speaking in the SAME WAY we accurately state that "space as immediate attribute TO any field is the barrier which causes electrification", we are literally sweeping the attribute of a polarized field, that being SPACE, against a dielectric causing electrification, rather than the interaction of fields, we have their attributes influencing conjugate fields (mag on dielectric fields etc.)


This of course is , almost, one of those "chicken or the egg" situations, but still all math and evidence points to the Space itself OF a field, rather than the field itself. Namely, ALL fields ARE Ether-modalities by definition, logically and reductively so!

Convergent fields (conterspatial) and divergent fields ('spatial', or polarized)

A space (as attribute to a polarized field) sweeping against a counterspace-barrier = Planck / Electrification.

This "NO Causation" (as per fields, since there is no field in space , rather only the inverse) feature is part of a couple of books by
OLEG JEFIMENKO

BUT he NEVER makes the the connection between fields and space!!!! Arggh!
He has the math, he points out the mystery, but he MISSES the connection!!

He states:
It is traditionally asserted that, according to Maxwell’s equation (3), a changing magnetic field produces an electric field (‘Faraday induction’) and that, according to Maxwell’s equation (4), a changing electric field produces a magnetic field (‘Maxwell induction’). The very useful and successful method of calculating induced voltage (emf) in terms of changing magnetic
flux appears to support the reality of Faraday induction. And the existence of electromagnetic waves appears to support the reality of both Faraday induction and Maxwell induction. Note, however, that as explained in section 1, Maxwell’s equation (3), which is usually considered as depicting Faraday induction, does not represent a cause-and-effect relation because in this equation the electric and the magnetic field is evaluated for the same moment of time. Note also that in electromagnetic waves electric and magnetic fields are in phase, that is, simultaneous in time, and hence, according to the principle of causality (which states that the cause always
precedes its effect), the two fields cannot cause each other (by the principle of causality, the fields should be out of phase if they create each other).


And there is one more fact that supports the conclusion that what we call ‘electromagnetic induction’ is not the creation of one of the two fields by the other. In the covariant formulation of electrodynamics, electric and magnetic fields appear as components of one single entity— the electromagnetic field tensor (dielectric). Quite clearly, a component of a tensor cannot be a cause of another component of the same tensor, just like a component of a vector cannot be a cause of another component of the same vector.

Therefore, since it is impossible to interpret both the electric and the magnetic field as relativistic effects, one must conclude that neither field is a relativistic effect.


MINE:
This is why the insane fools of GR and QM (Or as Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")have created a "mystical" effect precedes cause nonsense. They dont grasp that time and space are attributional to fields and field interactions, and they have no existence autonomous OF or from fields themselves.

Ive always called it the "Cult of Quantum"





OLEG JEFIMENKO

jefimenko
(October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine - May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) - physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.

Biography
He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956).In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-04-2014 at 02:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers