Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

View Poll Results: What is the fIELd geometry of the Universe?
OPEN 2 25.00%
FLAT 1 12.50%
CLOSED 1 12.50%
OTHER 4 50.00%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-01-2013, 03:12 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
Is the Universe OPEN, FLAT, CLOSED?





Brian Schmidt: The accelerating Universe - Vice-Chancellor's Lecture Series - YouTube

Which of these three universal models do you prefer?
Watch the video if you need help deciding.

The fella in the video is Brian Schmidt, a noble Nobel winner in 2011.

Open - Infinite - Light

Flat - Just Right

Closed - Finite - Heavy


Here is another analogy re: OPEN vs. CLOSED.



source of image:
http://www.energeticforum.com/171565-post160.html

Before voting you might want to read post #14 first.
Is the Universe OPEN, FLAT, CLOSED?

Why do we need to decide what the fIELd looks like?

Quote:
"If you want to control the field you must replicate the field geometry....structure and function cannot be seperated.

Thats what Tesla was doing when he experimented with different geometries."

-Junglelord

RIP Junglelord

selah V

Raphael
__________________
 

Last edited by Raphael37; 05-15-2013 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 05-02-2013, 03:08 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
This thread has 47 views.

And this interesting lecture given by a noble Nobel winner has managed only 2 votes.

Would it not be important to zero in on a 'model' that sciences can agree on...?
At least the sciences?


(...religion comes later...)

cheers,
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2013, 03:39 PM
Allcanadian's Avatar
Allcanadian Allcanadian is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 659
If we were a fish in the middle of an ocean of water would we call the "medium" we have no conception of -- flat, open or closed?.

I would say none of the above because water is not flat, it is not open nor is it closed. If we are a fish in what appears to be an infinite ocean then we cannot define a beginning or an end as we have already defined it as infinite. As well we cannot define it as closed because we have concrete proof there is an end to it. We cannot say it is open because we do not know and a flat universe is really not much different than the flat Earth concept and we all know how that turned out.

AC
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2013, 05:31 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allcanadian View Post
If we were a fish in the middle of an ocean of water would we call the "medium" we have no conception of -- flat, open or closed?.

I would say none of the above because water is not flat, it is not open nor is it closed. If we are a fish in what appears to be an infinite ocean then we cannot define a beginning or an end as we have already defined it as infinite. As well we cannot define it as closed because we have concrete proof there is an end to it. We cannot say it is open because we do not know and a flat universe is really not much different than the flat Earth concept and we all know how that turned out.

AC
So if I were you or a fish I would cast a vote for 'other'

But I cannot vote for you.

Vote now

cheers
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2013, 02:03 AM
Ein~+ein Ein~+ein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 298
Ask those on a cosmology forum. This one's on renewable energy.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2013, 04:30 AM
Kytsun Kytsun is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The first world
Posts: 11
Send a message via AIM to Kytsun
There is respectable evidence that 1) the vaccuum contains a "formally infinite" amount of energy, and 2) that the universe is not only expanding, but accelerating. If we accept these as true, then I would say the universe is open, and will continue to be open forever.

However, my own nutty two cents: defining the universe in terms of the conventions invented to grasp it is a mistake. You can model a desk in terms of cartesian coordinates, but really that desk is a heap of atoms that exist in space, not as length and width and depth, but distance from the perciever. If there really is only one dimension of space, then "open", "closed", and "flat" might not properly define the universe.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-2013, 02:41 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
Thank you for the votes cast thus far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ein~+ein View Post
Ask those on a cosmology forum. This one's on renewable energy.
LOL
Yes there are folks who BELIEVE that renewable energy has nothing to do with the underlying cosmology of the universe.
Are you one of those?

Do you know what ASYMMETRY is?
I see one of the most popular threads in this forum is about ASYMMETRY.
i.e. >> My Asymmetric Electrodynamic Machines

Hey Einstein I guessed you missed what I posted in the opening thread, suggesting WHY I posted this particular poll in this sub-forum?

Quote:
"If you want to control the field you must replicate the field geometry .... structure and function cannot be seperated.
So what is renewable energy and why should ASYMMETRY be part of the solution?

As far as I am concerned before we can arrive in the place called FREE ENERGY that above quote must be respected.

TEDxMarin - Jay Harman - An Alternative Cure for Global Warming - YouTube
Therefore please watch the following video, the first 3 minutes will do and then comment.

Mind if I say you and most folks are chasing your own tail/tale and you don't even know it!

Did ya know that the SWASTIKA which is about 12,000 years old, is ASYMMETRIC?
Because it is.

Did ya know that the SWASTIKA architecture has been used to design the NANO LIGHT MILL, a motor that can turn a DISK that is 4000 times its own size?
Is that efficient?
Is the swastika a mechanism that Mother Nature uses to get the job done?


Here is a link illustrating the SWASTIKA NANO LIGHT MILL, scroll down to APP (application) #6.
NANO World APPLICATIONS for the SWASTIKA the true blue AVATAR | Alternative Thinking 37

Are you getting in over your head, is cognitive dissonance about to embrace you?
Maybe, hang in there TRUTH is on the way.

namaste
__________________
 

Last edited by Raphael37; 05-06-2013 at 03:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-2013, 02:45 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kytsun View Post
There is respectable evidence that 1) the vaccuum contains a "formally infinite" amount of energy, and 2) that the universe is not only expanding, but accelerating. If we accept these as true, then I would say the universe is open, and will continue to be open forever.

However, my own nutty two cents: defining the universe in terms of the conventions invented to grasp it is a mistake. You can model a desk in terms of cartesian coordinates, but really that desk is a heap of atoms that exist in space, not as length and width and depth, but distance from the perciever. If there really is only one dimension of space, then "open", "closed", and "flat" might not properly define the universe.
But did you watch the video in its entirety?

This one might help you decide?
TEDxMarin - Jay Harman - An Alternative Cure for Global Warming - YouTube

cheers,
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2013, 04:06 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raphael37 View Post
But did you watch the video in its entirety?

This one might help you decide?
TEDxMarin - Jay Harman - An Alternative Cure for Global Warming - YouTube

cheers,


Name the tune @ mark 0:42 - 1:20
Movie Moment - Contact (First Contact) - YouTube

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-06-2013, 07:31 PM
freepenguin freepenguin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 52
Do we have luxury to entertain and enjoy Metaphysics under name of objective science?

I consider cosmology is pseudo science. Those scientists should spend their time and energy to solve real problems in the world.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-06-2013, 07:36 PM
Allcanadian's Avatar
Allcanadian Allcanadian is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 659
@Raphael37
Quote:
But did you watch the video in its entirety?
This one might help you decide?
TEDxMarin - Jay Harman - An Alternative Cure for Global Warming - YouTube
Yes and thank you, imagine that, a man named Victor Schauberger knew all this and much more almost 100 years ago yet he was labelled a quack. He was ridiculed by most all of main stream science and it still continues to this day. I hope this tech goes viral so they may finally see what fools they have been.

AC
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 05-06-2013, 10:36 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allcanadian View Post
@Raphael37


Yes and thank you, imagine that, a man named Victor Schauberger knew all this and much more almost 100 years ago yet he was labelled a quack. He was ridiculed by most all of main stream science and it still continues to this day. I hope this tech goes viral so they may finally see what fools they have been.

AC
All Viktor S. did was find an APPLICATION for what 'just is' is.
Jay Harman is doing exactly the same thing i.e. finding APPLICATIONS, but IMHO he is finding great APPLICATIONS for what 'just is'.
(the way it should be)
Both Viktor S. and Jay Harman built on the wisdom of those who came before them and have found APPLICATIONS.

Viktor was NOT the first to be mesmerized by helical vortex motions.
Viktor was not the first person to observe nature and conclude the obvious:

"The observer affects the observation"

...something the ancients summed up and called KARMA.
What if - Wave/Particle duality suggests KARMA?

BTW Democritus pondered such movements 2000+ years before Viktor S. was born and 370 years before Christ walked on water.
Quote:
Born: about 460 BC in Abdera, Thrace, Greece
Died: about 370 BC

Democritus's philosophy contains an early form of the conservation of energy. In his theory atoms are eternal and so is motion. Democritus explained the origin of the universe through atoms moving randomly and colliding to form larger bodies and worlds. There was no place in his theory for divine intervention. Instead he postulated a world which had always existed, and would always exist, and was filled with atoms moving randomly. Vortex motions occurred due to collisions of the atoms and in resulting vortex motion created differentiation of the atoms into different levels due only to their differing mass. This was not a world which came about through the design or purpose of some supernatural being, but rather it was a world which came about through necessity, that is from the nature of the atoms themselves.

Democritus biography
And having said that I ponder what Jesus would say about the VORTEX?
Did the son of god know about the vortex?

I think he did.

How do I know, what kind of evidence exists?
Go ask the Freemason/Rosicrucian/scholar Arthur Waite what CARD X and CARD XXI of the Rider/Coleman/Waite Tarot deck signify.


selah V
__________________
 

Last edited by Raphael37; 05-07-2013 at 09:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-2013, 10:04 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
This link is just a reminder that there are MANY MANY MANY theories of everything or ToEs out there in lalala land.

Open Directory - Science: Physics: Alternative: Unified Theories

I would also include the I-Ching, the QaBaLaH, the Vedas, and all versions of the bible, OLD and NEW including the Quran as potential ToEs.



selah V
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-15-2013, 01:20 PM
Raphael37 Raphael37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: wxyz
Posts: 273
So I was reading an article today on Jain beliefs and I found the quote I am about to share on page 142

http://www.jainlibrary.org/elib_mast...ana_008333.pdf

...and I can guarantee you that this article and the beliefs found within the article antedate (came before) anything Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Brian Schmidt or Quantum mechanics proposes.

Quote:
Yantras are further divided into three categories. If the metal plate, which is used for carving, has a inward curve, i.e. concave surface, then the yantra is called a ' saucerlike yantra'.

If it has flat horizontal surface then it is called a 'flat yantra' and, lastly, if the yantra has an outward curve, i.e. a convex surface, then it is called a 'tortoise body-yantra'.

The first is not recommended for worship.
The second is tolerable, but the third is the best for worship.


So how does Jain cosmology match up with 21st century science/cosmology?

1/ inward curve, i.e. concave surface, then the yantra is called a ' saucerlike yantra'.

2/ flat horizontal surface then it is called a 'flat yantra'

3/ outward curve, i.e. a convex surface, then it is called a 'tortoise body-yantra'

So need I say more?

I only want to mention that the UNIVERSE appears to be a FUN HOUSE equipped with three kinds of MIRRORS!!!

Convex, Concave, and Flat
ALL three mirrors are capable of distortion.


BTW

Shall we continue to probe the nano realms using Jain cosmology and Jain science promoting the swastika?

My Asymmetric SWASTIKA NANO Machines
NANO World APPLICATIONS for the SWASTIKA the true blue AVATAR | Alternative Thinking 37

selah V

Raphael
__________________
 

Last edited by Raphael37; 05-15-2013 at 01:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers