Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-16-2013, 07:07 PM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 468
Colman Beta Decay, New Energy Source

Wesley, a TK researcher over at Overunity.com (user name stivep) just proved that in certain environments (e.g. inside RF fields) even normally stable nuclei can decay. He partially replicated Harold Victor Colman's 1956 British Patent and picked up Beta radiation from non-radioactive materials. The next phase is to extract electrical current, work in progress.

Wesley Video's:
Revolution has begun Free Energy Exposed part3 - YouTube

Harold Victor Colman's 1956 British Patent
"A new apparatus for producing an electric current"
www.rexresearch.com/colman/GB763062A.pdf

According to the present invention we provide apparatus comprising a generator unit said unit including a magnet adapted to produce a magnetic field, means for suspending a chemical mixture in said field, said mixture being composed of elements whose nuclei becomes unstable as a result of bombardment by short waves so that the elements become radio-active and also release electrical energy, said mixture being mounted between and in electrical contact with a pair of different metals, such as copper and zinc, a condenser mounted between said metals, a terminal electrically connected to each said metal, means for conveying said waves to said mixture and a lead shield surrounding said unit to prevent harmful radiation from said mixture.

The mixture is preferably composed of the elements Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt having Atomic Weights of 112, 31 and 59 respectively. The mixture which may be of powdered form is mounted in a tube of non-conducting, high heat resistivity material and is compressed between granulated zinc at one end of the tube and granulated copper at the other end, the ends of the tube being closed by brass caps 30 and the tube being carried in a suitable cradle so that it is located between the poles of the magnet.


Theory for Nuclear Beta Decay as an Energy Source
Overunity.com member, user name verpies sums it up:

"There is another way to look at it: The EM environment affects the stability of the nuclei.

There is more evidence of this influence here.

Cowan and Reines Neutrino Experiment
Cowan and Reines Neutrino Experiment

Contemporary science acknowledges the stimulation of light emission but not the stimulation of beta decay.

Also, it is important to notice, that experiments do not detect free neutrons in beta decay. They only detect electrons/positrons and deduce neutrinos/antineutrinos. Free neutrons are synthesized only in reverse-beta reactions and are easily absorbed by Cadmium atoms (e.g.: in CdCl2) with subsequent emission of a gamma ray. See the Cowan experiment.

Neutrinos/antineutrinos are only deduced since they are near impossible to detect directly.
...and according to Miles Mathis those extra neutrinos are not really emitted in beta decay but they are the result of bad accounting:

P.S.
The Miles Mathis paper, I recently quoted, explains a mechanism of the neutron decay as a collision with external electrons/positrons, suggesting that beta decay always has a cause that is external to the nucleus."


Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Ref:

- Radioactive decay, Changing decay rates
Radioactive decay - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

- Introductory NMR & MRI: Video 01: Precession and Resonance
Introductory NMR & MRI: Video 01: Precession and Resonance - YouTube

- Film badge dosimeter
You can differentiate between beta and gamma with a high ISO photo film with and without aluminum foil.
Film badge dosimeter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

- Neutrons are much harder to detect.
The CdCl2 that Wesley uses, is good at catching slow neutrons and converting them to gamma. When beta particles are shielded with heavy elements (e.g. Pb) it is worse than shielding them with light elements (e.g. Al) because heavy elements convert beta particles to X-Ray radiation through Bremsstrahlung effect. However Pb is better for shielding gamma radiation.

- It is interesting to consider the non-chemical properties of Cobalt and Cadmium.

Both elements are good neutron absorbers that emit gamma rays as an end result of this absorption.
59Co absorbs a neutron and converts to 60Co which then beta decays to 60Ni emitting a fast electron and an antineutrino, next the 60Ni emits two strong gamma rays.

-Also, what the hell is counterspace ?
It is a polar reciprocal of Euclidean space (1/s), that is the result of subunit transform in Projective Geometry (also see here).

This is what you get when you try to get below one quantum of space and that's why some people call it "inner space".
The natural movement in space is linear while the natural movement in counterspace is rotational (yet aperiodic). See here.

Miles Mathis proved, that below one quantum, tangential velocity of c in space was equivalent to an orbital velocity of 1/c in counterspace. See here.

http://api.viglink.com/api/click?for...36613800217310

More Proof of the Reality of the Charge Field
More Proof of the Reality of the Charge Field by Miles Mathis


Counterspace is an an essential concept for understanding modern physics. You'd be wise to learn it.

- Calcium Metaphosphate contains Phosphorus, Calcium and Oxygen.
"C" is an additional unreacted element - Carbon, that is mixed with the Calcium Metaphosphate.

Metaphosphoric Acid + Calcium Hydroxide ---> Calcium Metaphosphate + Water

1 part Co(No3)2 6H2O
2 parts CdCl2
3 parts of 3Ca (PO3)2 + 10C






Could be that a old technology from Thomas Edison, way back in 1903, to Coleman 1956 and Reiss 1982 patents, using NM Resonance, crossed with a magnetic field to stimulate Beta decay, to then create electrical energy from matter?!

More to follow...

Cheers
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 04-17-2013, 10:34 AM
Kempis Kempis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15
Nqr

I think it is closely related:

Nuclear quadrupole resonance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regards
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2013, 03:36 PM
PhysicsProf PhysicsProf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 229
Vrand -- a nice summary, thank you:

Quote:
Originally Posted by vrand View Post
Wesley, a TK researcher over at Overunity.com (user name stivep) just proved that in certain environments (e.g. inside RF fields) even normally stable nuclei can decay. He partially replicated Harold Victor Colman's 1956 British Patent and picked up Beta radiation from non-radioactive materials. The next phase is to extract electrical current, work in progress.

Wesley Video's:
Revolution has begun Free Energy Exposed part3 - YouTube

Harold Victor Colman's 1956 British Patent
"A new apparatus for producing an electric current"
www.rexresearch.com/colman/GB763062A.pdf

According to the present invention we provide apparatus comprising a generator unit said unit including a magnet adapted to produce a magnetic field, means for suspending a chemical mixture in said field, said mixture being composed of elements whose nuclei becomes unstable as a result of bombardment by short waves so that the elements become radio-active and also release electrical energy, said mixture being mounted between and in electrical contact with a pair of different metals, such as copper and zinc, a condenser mounted between said metals, a terminal electrically connected to each said metal, means for conveying said waves to said mixture and a lead shield surrounding said unit to prevent harmful radiation from said mixture.

The mixture is preferably composed of the elements Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt having Atomic Weights of 112, 31 and 59 respectively. The mixture which may be of powdered form is mounted in a tube of non-conducting, high heat resistivity material and is compressed between granulated zinc at one end of the tube and granulated copper at the other end, the ends of the tube being closed by brass caps 30 and the tube being carried in a suitable cradle so that it is located between the poles of the magnet.


Theory for Nuclear Beta Decay as an Energy Source
Overunity.com member, user name verpies sums it up:

"There is another way to look at it: The EM environment affects the stability of the nuclei.

There is more evidence of this influence here.

Cowan and Reines Neutrino Experiment
Cowan and Reines Neutrino Experiment

Contemporary science acknowledges the stimulation of light emission but not the stimulation of beta decay.

Also, it is important to notice, that experiments do not detect free neutrons in beta decay. They only detect electrons/positrons and deduce neutrinos/antineutrinos. Free neutrons are synthesized only in reverse-beta reactions and are easily absorbed by Cadmium atoms (e.g.: in CdCl2) with subsequent emission of a gamma ray. See the Cowan experiment.

Neutrinos/antineutrinos are only deduced since they are near impossible to detect directly.
...and according to Miles Mathis those extra neutrinos are not really emitted in beta decay but they are the result of bad accounting:

P.S.
The Miles Mathis paper, I recently quoted, explains a mechanism of the neutron decay as a collision with external electrons/positrons, suggesting that beta decay always has a cause that is external to the nucleus."


Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Ref:

- Radioactive decay, Changing decay rates
Radioactive decay - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

- Introductory NMR & MRI: Video 01: Precession and Resonance
Introductory NMR & MRI: Video 01: Precession and Resonance - YouTube

- Film badge dosimeter
You can differentiate between beta and gamma with a high ISO photo film with and without aluminum foil.
Film badge dosimeter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

- Neutrons are much harder to detect.
The CdCl2 that Wesley uses, is good at catching slow neutrons and converting them to gamma. When beta particles are shielded with heavy elements (e.g. Pb) it is worse than shielding them with light elements (e.g. Al) because heavy elements convert beta particles to X-Ray radiation through Bremsstrahlung effect. However Pb is better for shielding gamma radiation.

- It is interesting to consider the non-chemical properties of Cobalt and Cadmium.

Both elements are good neutron absorbers that emit gamma rays as an end result of this absorption.
59Co absorbs a neutron and converts to 60Co which then beta decays to 60Ni emitting a fast electron and an antineutrino, next the 60Ni emits two strong gamma rays.

-Also, what the hell is counterspace ?
It is a polar reciprocal of Euclidean space (1/s), that is the result of subunit transform in Projective Geometry (also see here).

This is what you get when you try to get below one quantum of space and that's why some people call it "inner space".
The natural movement in space is linear while the natural movement in counterspace is rotational (yet aperiodic). See here.

Miles Mathis proved, that below one quantum, tangential velocity of c in space was equivalent to an orbital velocity of 1/c in counterspace. See here.

http://api.viglink.com/api/click?for...36613800217310

More Proof of the Reality of the Charge Field
More Proof of the Reality of the Charge Field by Miles Mathis


Counterspace is an an essential concept for understanding modern physics. You'd be wise to learn it.

- Calcium Metaphosphate contains Phosphorus, Calcium and Oxygen.
"C" is an additional unreacted element - Carbon, that is mixed with the Calcium Metaphosphate.

Metaphosphoric Acid + Calcium Hydroxide ---> Calcium Metaphosphate + Water

1 part Co(No3)2 6H2O
2 parts CdCl2
3 parts of 3Ca (PO3)2 + 10C






Could be that a old technology from Thomas Edison, way back in 1903, to Coleman 1956 and Reiss 1982 patents, using NM Resonance, crossed with a magnetic field to stimulate Beta decay, to then create electrical energy from matter?!

More to follow...

Cheers
"More to follow..." Please do follow up!

In particular -- I'm curious, how do they (any of the researchers in this area) MEASURE the beta / gamma/ neutron emissions? Do they just use dosimeters or Geiger counters, or do they actually measure the energy SPECTRUM of the emitted particles? (The latter will give much more information than a dosimeter or Geiger counter can do.)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-18-2013, 05:46 PM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
Although I am not in agreement that this newest video is using Alfa/Beta/or Gamma radiation, as to produce the output shown, as some have speculated. I feel that this really all needs to be confirmed, and further tested.
My feelings are that as Tariel Kapanadze, Tesla, Moray, and others have mentioned repeatedly, that this energy is coming from the surrounding ambient.
Radiation, if present may be a consequence, of this conversion, instead of the cause.
Electricity, all comes from the Aether, the primordial soup, not from matter. That is my opinion. Which I can't prove, nor can current science disprove, as well, at least not well enough for me to accept.
My two cents, take it for what its worth. Time will tell, and is telling.

Newest Russian video: I hope that it's true. We need it to be...
a k u l a 0 0 8 3- Free Energy750W no batery no ground - YouTube

Nick_Z
__________________
 

Last edited by Nick_Z; 04-27-2013 at 03:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2013, 09:24 PM
RAMSET RAMSET is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC and Conn USA
Posts: 1,421
Any Data from your self ?

Nick Z
Quote
"as to not continue to mislead."

--------------
Nick
That is a strong statement !
Have your experiments proven otherwise?

Have you run any experiments in front of a GM tube?


thx
Chet
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-19-2013, 12:15 AM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
If that is the case, I would not continue on with ferrite HF, and short wave emission pulses. Geiger counters may not provide actual proof.
I believe in what the people that I mentioned, say and take it at face value, until it can be confirmed one way or another. Radiation is not for me, and there may not be any safe way to protect oneself from some known types of radiation.
I am currently working in this direction, but if I find that radiation as in gamma decay, is behind it, and the primary cause of the electrical output, I will discontinue this direction of FE research. Until that time I will wait and see, while continuing on. I hope that I'm not being too stupid about this.
If anyone would like to add to this information, or lack of it, please do so.
As more objective tests are really needed.

Nick_Z
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-19-2013, 01:19 AM
RAMSET RAMSET is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC and Conn USA
Posts: 1,421
To which case are you referring?

Nick
You claim deception is afoot {misleading] ,and you base this statement on nothing of substance????

Nor do you have the ability to properly "test" for this in any way whatsoever?

Unfortunately Zeal does not constitute credibility........and insult with out investigation is not a proper course ..........

As you say there is much at stake here !

thx
Chet
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-19-2013, 03:52 AM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
RAMSET:
You are mentioning deception, not me. As gamma radiation tests have not been properly conducted in this case in particular, of the video above. There is also no adequate protection from this supposed source of as yet unproven electrical output in this particular case. No one has actually made the test, other than Wesley with a Geiger counter on other previous projects. Just how accurate those may be, or how it relates to this yoke device is unknown, at least as far a I know. So, to claim a possible connection to very dangerous gamma emission device or even Alfa/Beta source, as the working principal is premature, and possibly misleading. I feel, and is my opinion until further notice. In any case I will continue to work in that direction, myself, for now.
Ramset, this is my last reply to you,
I have given the above statements to anyone else interested, as a warning, only, even though I will take the risks, or benefits, if there are any.
__________________
 

Last edited by Nick_Z; 04-19-2013 at 05:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-19-2013, 06:32 AM
RAMSET RAMSET is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC and Conn USA
Posts: 1,421
To mislead

Nick Z
Quote
I feel that this really all needs to be confirmed, as to not continue to mislead.
--------------

Mislead definition
1. to give false or misleading information
2. to lead or guide in the wrong direction


Nick Z
You offer zero zilch nada to support your claims ?Other than "its scary and not safe"
you are entitled to your opinions ,however regarding claims of Wesley's deception as it applies to this Topic [colman beta decay]?
your words speak for themselves.

--
NMR has been reported in regard to TK device ages ago [by team wesley]
issues with replication became apparent,
safety as noted by T1000 [original team Wesley member]was also an issue "The Biggest issue",still is.

This newest approach uses much less power and you are right to be cautious
chose your words and accusations more carefully,Wesley has spent a fortune to open source this to you,HE experiments for your benefit and your safety!

And shares all he can .

To PLAY with this on the kitchen Table with out proper equipment [safety] ,or to encourage others to do so is Grossly negligent.And Wesley is not encouraging this ,quite the opposite ,HE is taking all the risks.

A little gratitude and appreciation would be nice.....

I see you are back peddling and adding "Possibly " to your "Misleading " claim

So no more from me on this !
thx
Chet
__________________
 

Last edited by RAMSET; 04-19-2013 at 07:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-19-2013, 03:35 PM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
I will make some corrections if I may, at the risk of being a bore...

This electrical output from ferrite yokes or other ferrite forms MAY not possibly be safe, IF the electrical output claimed is due to nuclear decay. But, this output MAY not be due to the reasons given (nuclear decay), at all. Nor the risks involved, either.
Yes, this all needs to be verified and confirmed. Not by me. As no conclusive test have been made lately to actually prove the point, one way or another. Especially on this latest (no battery, no ground) video. Where no test have been made. Geiger counter test made "ages ago" on a different type of device aren't conclusive of all devices, nor prove that the electrical output is actually due to reasons given.

I have never suggested or intended anything such as what Ramset is saying, as he is an expert at twisting ones words:
"Deception is a foot"? "Back peddling", "to PLAY with on the kitchen table, or to encourage others to do so, is GROSSLY NEGLIGENT." "HE is taking all the risks" (Wesley). On, and on...

If "possibly misleading" is also too strong a statement, I will retract it, with my apologies.
Nick_Z

P.S. Here are some comments made on another forum, I feel that they deserve attention here, as they may add to what has already been suggested.

Colman_Gillespie Device
__________________
 

Last edited by Nick_Z; 04-20-2013 at 05:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2013, 04:20 PM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhysicsProf View Post
Vrand -- a nice summary, thank you:



"More to follow..." Please do follow up!

In particular -- I'm curious, how do they (any of the researchers in this area) MEASURE the beta / gamma/ neutron emissions? Do they just use dosimeters or Geiger counters, or do they actually measure the energy SPECTRUM of the emitted particles? (The latter will give much more information than a dosimeter or Geiger counter can do.)


Here is Wesley's latest video (Part 5) taking measurements with his new "Ranger" nuclear identification detector instrument:

Revolution Has Begun Free Energy Exposed part5.avi

Revolution Has Begun Free Energy Exposed part5.avi - YouTube




Ranger Plus specifications:

Ranger Plus has both gamma and neutron
detectors.

http://www.atomreaktor.dk/geiger/RangerBkg.pdf

http://www.atomreaktor.dk/geiger/Ranger.pdf

http://www.qsl.net/k/k0ff/Ranger%20M...r%20Manual.pdf

http://www.atomreaktor.dk/geiger/Ranger.pdf



Some more reference materials from Wesley, reading recommendations:

- Thorium Plasma Battery Technology - Wrongly Top Secret?
Thorium Plasma Battery Technology - Wrongly Top Secret? - Green Energy Reports - Open Salon

- The Interview That Convinced Me (Eugene Mallove Part 2/12)
The Interview That Convinced Me (Eugene Mallove Part 2/12) - YouTube

more at overunity.com, stivep message
Reply #17155 on: April 21, 2013, 02:54:07 AM
Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze


Getting interesting

More to follow...

Cheers
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 04-26-2013, 08:22 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_Z View Post
I will make some corrections if I may, at the risk of being a bore...

This electrical output from ferrite yokes or other ferrite forms MAY not possibly be safe, IF the electrical output claimed is due to nuclear decay. But, this output MAY not be due to the reasons given (nuclear decay), at all. Nor the risks involved, either.
Yes, this all needs to be verified and confirmed. Not by me. As no conclusive test have been made lately to actually prove the point, one way or another. Especially on this latest (no battery, no ground) video. Where no test have been made. Geiger counter test made "ages ago" on a different type of device aren't conclusive of all devices, nor prove that the electrical output is actually due to reasons given.

I have never suggested or intended anything such as what Ramset is saying, as he is an expert at twisting ones words:
"Deception is a foot"? "Back peddling", "to PLAY with on the kitchen table, or to encourage others to do so, is GROSSLY NEGLIGENT." "HE is taking all the risks" (Wesley). On, and on...

If "possibly misleading" is also too strong a statement, I will retract it, with my apologies.
Nick_Z

P.S. Here are some comments made on another forum, I feel that they deserve attention here, as they may add to what has already been suggested.

Colman_Gillespie Device
Wooo Hoooo! I see that now every impulse power source will be confiscated due to dangerous gamma radiation
Nick_Z watch your back, they are coming for your computer containing dangerous impulse DC power source.

I think I know where is the answer. Tesla has give it to us. Remember he was working on x-Rays with an intensity never before and after used and taken clear pictures from a few meters of distance. He was surprised first when Roentgen and others reported dangers from x-ray exposure. Then his ASSISTANT was injured (but we don't know who performed the actual experimentation and if Tesla supervized it) and Tesla changed his mind - it was one of very rare occasions when he did that ! . Very intriguing.....
It is a common understanding that Tesla investigating some other kind of radiation different then x-Rays and that he did not recognized the differences. I doubt about that, I think the answer lies in purity ! IMHO Tesla used one single pure frequency from X-Ray range and didn't scattered matter by mixed waves.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-27-2013, 01:01 AM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
Yes, my computer, well they can have it, as the thing only works when it wants to, and only after a few swift kicks. And only I know where to kick it.


In the last two weeks there have been two or more self-running devices that have been uploaded onto the internet. So, before this second one is also removed by who knows who, I'll post it here, as well.
Гость УСТАНОВКА - YouTube

We don't know what is the actual working principle of these two somewhat similar devices. The first one was mentioned in my previous posts, and this newer one now, that has just come out a few days ago.
I leave it to your discretion.

Here is a picture of my current device, before I rework it into something similar to what is being shown as the two self runners, that I've mentioned.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2013-04-26 12.47.08 (Medium).jpg (52.8 KB, 49 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-28-2013, 04:59 AM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Thank you for opening this subject to the interested people.

as I can not advise legally anyone to do any experiments I'm posting some notes to myself: :
hehehhe

1. power from transmitter must be not less than 10-50W as we do not know the frequency of response as of yet.
2 the suspiciousness of mine is that there is no magic frequency only but range of frequencies the compound is reacting with. the more far from frequency of response the more power is needed to have some sort of mutual correspondence.
3.Be careful with cheap instruments to do not be fooled by RF contamination.
Good shielded old one is the best.( Faraday cage)
4. it is good or must to have something of this sort:
a.Alpha Particle Spark Detector one of examples can be:

Alpha Particle Spark Detector | eBay

but you can make it by yourself using
Spark detector for alpha particles
Spark detector for alpha particles - YouTube

or just:
similar to:
http://www.imagesco.com/geiger/files/detector.pdf


5.MDH Radcal 1015 Radiation Detector/ X-Ray Monitor w/ 10X5-180 & 10X5-6M Probes Z
MDH Radcal 1015 Radiation Detector x Ray Monitor w 10x5 180 10x5 6M Probes Z | eBay
Note: bargain price for 200 and lower he is going to go for it

Radcal MDH 1015 in FDA Compliance Procedures for 35 Years and Counting

I have got one today - I do know know how to use it yet
if someone has manual please post it here

6. Good Radiac meter or similar.

7. if possible Quantrad Sensor Ranger RNG-PLUS Gamma/Neutron Detector Analyzer

8. photomultiplier spectrometer or mass spectrometer



That what is above should be sufficient to cover Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray
Remember:
Geiger Muller is working based on principals of ionization chamber
it measure ionization

if it is Alpha Beta Gamma than opening small flip disc window in radiac probe= Beta to go in if closed= Gamma


if distinction is to be made between Beta and Alpha use paper( stops alpha)
if distinction is to be made between Beta and Gamma use aluminium foil ( stops Beta)



9. Operation:
to make sure that compound is responding
a- switch of the RF and se slow Decay- look for aftershock
b. do not use magnets magnets are to disperse Beta acts as brakes in your car.
c. heat might be present only under load as we are dealing with DC in output.

understand:
a:Auger electron spectroscopy
Auger electron spectroscopy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

b:Cobalt-60
why?
Because we are starting with cobalt 59 look at that interactive material to understand.

c:The mixture which is contained within the quartz tube is composed of the elements Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt having Atomic Weights 112, 31 and 59 respectively Conven 70 iently these elements may' be present in the following compounds and where the tube is to contain thirty milligrams of the mixture the compounds and their proportions by weight are as follows: 75 1 Part of Co (No 3) 2 6 H 2 O 2 Parts of Cd Cl.

3 Parts of 3 Ca (Po 3) 2 + 1 OC.

d: pulsing even manual pulsing helps activation ( it might be something in it.



To your scrutiny:
20130425 Presentation by Wesley in New York
20130425 Presentation by Wesley in New York - YouTube


Wesley
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-29-2013, 04:59 PM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by stivep View Post
Thank you for opening this subject to the interested people.

as I can not advise legally anyone to do any experiments I'm posting some notes to myself: :
hehehhe

1. power from transmitter must be not less than 10-50W as we do not know the frequency of response as of yet.
2 the suspiciousness of mine is that there is no magic frequency only but range of frequencies the compound is reacting with. the more far from frequency of response the more power is needed to have some sort of mutual correspondence.
3.Be careful with cheap instruments to do not be fooled by RF contamination.
Good shielded old one is the best.( Faraday cage)
4. it is good or must to have something of this sort:
a.Alpha Particle Spark Detector one of examples can be:

Alpha Particle Spark Detector | eBay

but you can make it by yourself using
Spark detector for alpha particles
Spark detector for alpha particles - YouTube

or just:
similar to:
http://www.imagesco.com/geiger/files/detector.pdf


5.MDH Radcal 1015 Radiation Detector/ X-Ray Monitor w/ 10X5-180 & 10X5-6M Probes Z
MDH Radcal 1015 Radiation Detector x Ray Monitor w 10x5 180 10x5 6M Probes Z | eBay
Note: bargain price for 200 and lower he is going to go for it

Radcal MDH 1015 in FDA Compliance Procedures for 35 Years and Counting

I have got one today - I do know know how to use it yet
if someone has manual please post it here

6. Good Radiac meter or similar.

7. if possible Quantrad Sensor Ranger RNG-PLUS Gamma/Neutron Detector Analyzer

8. photomultiplier spectrometer or mass spectrometer



That what is above should be sufficient to cover Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray
Remember:
Geiger Muller is working based on principals of ionization chamber
it measure ionization

if it is Alpha Beta Gamma than opening small flip disc window in radiac probe= Beta to go in if closed= Gamma


if distinction is to be made between Beta and Alpha use paper( stops alpha)
if distinction is to be made between Beta and Gamma use aluminium foil ( stops Beta)



9. Operation:
to make sure that compound is responding
a- switch of the RF and se slow Decay- look for aftershock
b. do not use magnets magnets are to disperse Beta acts as brakes in your car.
c. heat might be present only under load as we are dealing with DC in output.

understand:
a:Auger electron spectroscopy
Auger electron spectroscopy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

b:Cobalt-60
why?
Because we are starting with cobalt 59 look at that interactive material to understand.

c:The mixture which is contained within the quartz tube is composed of the elements Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt having Atomic Weights 112, 31 and 59 respectively Conven 70 iently these elements may' be present in the following compounds and where the tube is to contain thirty milligrams of the mixture the compounds and their proportions by weight are as follows: 75 1 Part of Co (No 3) 2 6 H 2 O 2 Parts of Cd Cl.

3 Parts of 3 Ca (Po 3) 2 + 1 OC.

d: pulsing even manual pulsing helps activation ( it might be something in it.



To your scrutiny:
20130425 Presentation by Wesley in New York
20130425 Presentation by Wesley in New York - YouTube

Wesley

Thank you Wesley for sharing your very interesting work in this old, almost lost technology, keep up the good work!

Please continue your experiments as they look very promising in finding a new clean energy source to power our homes and cars.

Thank you for posting your references and equipment used as it helps in discovering how the process works.

I missed seeing that Carl Willis Youtube video for the Spark detector for alpha particles thank you for pointing that simple experiment out!

Spark detector for alpha particles - YouTube

Carl's Yourtube videos are very interesting in studying and understanding radioactivity and natures process for fusion, fission and transmutation of elements for the release of energy.

Have a great day, cheers!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2013, 08:50 PM
RAMSET RAMSET is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC and Conn USA
Posts: 1,421
An enormous contribution

Wesley
Quote

"Post it i here
Please Do it !!!""


Thank you for all your hard work ,as well as your commitment !!

You are a wonderful man!!

Thx
Chet
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-01-2013, 10:35 PM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Copy of the post from Overunity forum:

Quote:
I.m going to be posting something that you not talking about recently :


But Verpies if you find the time could you please analyze it disregard the fact of its sense on nonsense
Please do not concentrate on uranium or take uranium as possible example ( Video) -


it is important to see it as mechanism....................
and as the same mechanism for Colman compound as well.

energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (electron microscope analysis) of uraniu
energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (electron microscope analysis) of uranium minerals - YouTube
start from minute:5:00 of this video.


If electron is dispersed depends of energy level due to x-ray ( SPARK OF TK IS OUR XRAY source but any ion chamber even in coil capacitor due to high voltage )Depends from the fact that it might be as energetic to go to core of an atom or less energetic to play with K orbit of an atom and/or affecting valance electron
We are dealing in physical hole in that atom structure- that hole is than filled with electron fro different orbit.
As electron from higher orbit has higher energy level than it losses energy in quantum when it files the hole.
We are than dealing with relaxation - but as energy must be conserved than whatever is atom manifestation from outside
it is energy.
(Most of the times when electron loses its orbit produces photon= energy= no mass. and energy is huge.)

Than makes atom to produce at minimum Xray back at maximum Beta. Gamma.( I'm not sure if Neutron ..well if it hits nuclei.) everything depends on energy level of "destructive" hit.
could that be applied to ferrite, even to copper ( yes)( could we deal with NMR at the same time as well?- why not)
That energy from atom as it is in unstable stage is than affecting coil capacitor of TK
That rood that I was pointing in TK video Aquarium- steady state generator)
Capacitor than will be charged, If than discharging and coupling circuitry is design part of that energy is returned back to sustain instability of a compound if thatr compound is to be found in TK device.
But if it is not than we have non TK concept.


I'm waiting for XRF spectroscopy analyzer that should arrive shortly to my location.
It is 100% help from seller who decided to give it to me instead of sale it to me.
It has all software and hardware and photo multipliers and cells 2 ribbon cables have been chewed by unfriendly creatures
Color screen and 3D representation.
The importance of it is in fact of recording changes in compound as additional prove of transmutation and
will give me chance to look close in to compound used in general.


I'm also hunting for another one we will see if I would succeed That one is 240k new using cryogenic
high purity germanium detector I have chance to cut a deal similar to previous one.


The result might be to assign chemical parameters to no doubt for its repetitiveness
One might ask why I'm going to so much trouble hunting Colman.


Answer:
I have seen it acting and reacting.







energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (electron microscope analysis) of uranium minerals - YouTube
YouTube

xray spectrometer - YouTube
YouTube
X-ray Electron Spectroscopy / Auger Electron Spectroscopy - YouTube
YouTube
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectrometer Tour by Roy Murray - YouTube
YouTube MESSENGER's X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS) [720p] - YouTube
YouTube

X-Supreme8000 XRF (x-ray fluorescence) spectrometer for materials analysis used in quality - YouTube
YouTube
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) training through MRFN.org - YouTube
YouTube


MRFN.org - YouTube
YouTube


SIMS training through MRFN - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


XPS Analysis through MRFN - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


Bragg Spectrometer, Bragg's Spectrometer Method, Working of Bragg Spectrometer - YouTube
YouTube[/li]

[li]
The MIDEX Micro X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer from Spectro - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


What is X-ray Spectroscopy? - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


spectrometer - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


Make your own CD spectrometer - YouTube
YouTube[/li]
[li]


https://www.google.com/search?q=spec...w=1096&bih=582



Colman Beta Decay, New Energy Source
www.energeticforum.com[/li]



http://www.tau.ac.il/~lab3/XRF/xrf.pdf LOOK FOR Auger Electron



Wesley
__________________
 

Last edited by stivep; 05-02-2013 at 03:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-02-2013, 12:30 AM
level level is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 412
Maximum Radiation Exposure Levels Info and related info

For anyone who is thinking of experimenting with the Colman device, since it is claimed that it generates radiation you may want to read the following info on maximum human radiation exposure levels. I would suggest reading through the whole article and make sure you understand it all before even considering proceeding with experimenting with the Colman device.
Radiation, how much is considered safe for humans?

You would also need some sort of decent Geiger counter and possibly other types of detection equipment to estimate radiation exposure levels. Images Co sells a few different types of devices that may be useful and which aren't real expensive.

Different types of radiation requires different types and degrees of shielding, so you should do your research on this as well. This may help as a starting point:
Radiation Protection

For radiation shielding, you can get lead sheets and a few lead lined containers of different types here (Images Co):
Radiation Safety: Lead Shielding
Not sure what exact type or types of radiation the Colman device can produce, so although lead shielding might help, thickness required would need to be determined and other types of shielding might be necessary as well. Not something to take lightly in my opinion anyway.

Images Co also sells various types of Geiger counters and related equipment and accessories, but I don't know how good these devices are, but at least some of the geiger counters they sell can be calibration certified by the NRC:
NRC Calibration Certification
Images Co radiation detection equipment:
Geiger Counter Index

The above info is certainly not comprehensive, and I also can't vouch for the accuracy of all the information referenced above. I am just posting this info as a starting point. Make sure you know what you are doing if you are going to experiment with any devices that can emit significant amounts of radiation. Too much radiation exposure can potentially lead to serious diseases developing like certain types of cancer. Be safe.

P.S. - Something very important to consider here
Something very important to consider here IMO is that, if I remember correctly, the patent states that once you get the device reacting by applying an RF field of the appropriate frequency and strength to the tube, the reaction will continue for about a month even if you shut off the power to the RF transmitter. What are you going to do if you succeed in getting the device to start reacting? Are you going to leave the device in your house or apartment and have it generating radiation for at least a month, or what exactly?

Even if you only succeed in getting temporary bursts of radiation to come off the device, you should also keep in mind that you are not only putting yourself at risk from radiation, but all your family and friends and all your surrounding neighbors etc. will all be at risk. This really doesn't seem to be the type of experiment that should be conducted as a home experiment at all, and even if you do use a lot of radiation shielding, can you be absolutely certain that the radiation shielding you are using is 100% blocking all radiation? Probably not, unless you are a nuclear physicist or something along those lines. At any rate, it would not seem very responsible at all for the non-qualified person to experiment with this type of device, and most certainly not in your home where you may well be putting many others at risk. Probably the only responsible way to experiment with this type of device would be to make an arrangement with a professor at a university or a scientist at a research lab to allow use of a proper radiation safety shielded and equipped lab, and get direct supervision on the experiments from a properly qualified scientist or professor. IMO, if you can't arrange something like that then you probably shouldn't be doing these types of experiments at all.



.
__________________
level

Last edited by level; 05-02-2013 at 01:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-02-2013, 03:25 AM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
I agree with that comment.
170 lbs led box and everything inside to test - that what I have.
in the time of experiment I control energy level
I'm in early stage of it actually I'm on hold as glass tubes are very fragile.
I can not legally advice anyone to experiment with it.
The statement must be never touch it.
As danger associated with it I "talk to myself" leaving comment here
1. understand what is radioactivity
2. establish what I'm heaving and why
3. based on results take precaution if any
4. establish energetic level as I might deal with safety level of activation
a.Radiation protection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
b.read it: http://www-nds.iaea.org/publications...ecdoc-0469.pdf
c. in case I need it lead gloves
d. lead apron

5. if there is alpha than paper is OK to stop it. Alpha travels most likely few cm from source.

6. inverse square law stays that at any distance I'm getting 1/4 of the dose (D) divided by distance unit.
For example Trace of beta might be unreadable to Geiger Muller probe at the distance if 1m.
Say source is point A than distance of 1m=1/4D= point B in space.
from point A at distance of 2m=1/4D of B point in space= C point in space.
from point A at distance of 3m=1/4D of point C in space = point D in space ...........

That is only simple way of picturing radioactivity level and might not be very accurate it is just for you to understand ....... (Wesley

That is also indicator of radioactivity in this point.
7. if device is closed in lead box or lead bricks I might put collimator

Collimator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

simple one home made or buy one cheap.
8. If any authority ask to visit me... go ahead you not going to find anything not a single trace.

9. understanding and learning does not bring any harm.

10. using allowed samples of radioactive substance traced to the bureau or of allowed level is legal to say calibrate my Civil Defense instruments.




So for me does not give harm to know how to make or where to buy
formula you ( Wesley- any Wesley ) not buying it anyhow
formula is 100% non radioactive so you not doing anything wrong ( Wesley)

Since formula does not leave a trace that means it is not contaminating
The level is controlled by magnetic field that acts as breaks in the car.
So there is what stop action




understand that might be someone who does not want Andrea Rossi to lose his business because of some fellow who might have it simpler and not in any way more dangerous, and not in any way who wants to do any harm to nice Andrea Rossi who once was accused of millions of dollars losses of Italian government as one who contaminated many former oil storage supposedly by preparing cheap fuel for Italians.

The Magic of Mr. Rossi - YouTube

Low Energy Nuclear Revolution - YouTube
Wesley
__________________
 

Last edited by stivep; 05-02-2013 at 04:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-02-2013, 08:37 PM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
Wesley:
When do you think that you'll be able to show an ELECTRIC current output from your device, to prove the point of nuclear decay being a useable power source?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 05-02-2013, 11:49 PM
RAMSET RAMSET is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC and Conn USA
Posts: 1,421
Thank you for the privilege to read your private comments

I suppose you'll be getting bigger muscles with those Heavy Clothes.
make sure you eat your wheaties.....

thx
Chet
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-03-2013, 12:42 AM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Quote:
Nick_Z
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 227
Wesley:
When do you think that you'll be able to show an ELECTRIC current output from your device, to prove the point of nuclear decay being a useable power source?
Not soon.
I do not have proper compound
Copper and Zinc was delivered to my friend scientist as oxide.
Taking that I can only play with black part of it that is permanently embedded in to the total compound.

I have got yesterday
The scintillator dual photomultipier. I have redone ribbon cable chewed by mice.- Internal color display does not work. However it work with external monitor. So far I did not try it with serial port of external computer but software works only with XP and is password enabled.

I got to wait for powder.
@ glass pipes got damaged copper is out from one side- fortunately black staff is still intact.

Power amplifier:
I do not have anything with high power to try it on range from 100-500 MHz but I'm working on it.
All I have is 420-460MHz 50W regulated.
Spending is big as well for all of radioactivity based toys and travel.
But I pay only for my part. My friend for his.
Eventually I might be refunded with it without restricting conditions by any means. That is the deal.
I'm not obligated to keep anything secret but 180 degree opposite.

And I operate by this conditions.

Reasons for time taken?
1.cost
2.lack of experience in this field as no one knows what that leads to.
3.playing with different substances takes time also getting substances even more.
4. estimating level of "unpleasant factors" and proper safety measure.

Honestly I was never trying to build TK but to understand how it works.
Strange as it sounds this is the way I'm.
Fascination with already naked woman is short as than there is nothing new left.Just action..... there is no process left anymore.Nothing to uncover, nothing more to expose, no new futures, no surprising factors
Yes she might be very special .so what... it is like Kapanadze explained.

Please understand that



Wesley
__________________
 

Last edited by stivep; 05-03-2013 at 12:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-03-2013, 03:04 AM
Nick_Z Nick_Z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 334
@ Wesley:
Thank you for your explanation. I understand your goals. The reason I asked is that you had previously mentioned that you had seen some interesting results.

Last night I watched the video that you made, of you and Tariel in Georgia. I had never seen it before. It was quite interesting seeing their life there, the churches, and countryside, etz...

I was always surprised that you did not continue the successful yoke device, especially after being with TK, and experiencing his life, and talking with him first hand. Or some other TK type of replication. But, after what you just mentioned, I think I see why. Not due to the health hazards, entirely. I was concerned as I am working many days, weeks, and months, now at close distance to the ferrite yoke devices, as well as other ferrite cores, using HF/HV, etz..

As you may know I'm now working on the Akula 0083 device. At least trying to understand its mode of operation, in order to further work to replicate it. I have faith in that device, or something similar to it, working as is being shown, and not being just another fake. It may be blind faith, but it keeps me headed in that direction, in any case.
As you said, sometimes the experiment is the goal and the objective, instead of the outcome, or a commercial venture.
Good luck with your tests.
Nick_Z
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-03-2013, 04:11 AM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_Z View Post
@ Wesley:
Thank you for your explanation. I understand your goals. The reason I asked is that you had previously mentioned that you had seen some interesting results.

Last night I watched the video that you made, of you and Tariel in Georgia. I had never seen it before. It was quite interesting seeing their life there, the churches, and countryside, etz...

I was always surprised that you did not continue the successful yoke device, especially after being with TK, and experiencing his life, and talking with him first hand. Or some other TK type of replication. But, after what you just mentioned, I think I see why. Not due to the health hazards, entirely. I was concerned as I am working many days, weeks, and months, now at close distance to the ferrite yoke devices, as well as other ferrite cores, using HF/HV, etz..

As you may know I'm now working on the Akula 0083 device. At least trying to understand its mode of operation, in order to further work to replicate it. I have faith in that device, or something similar to it, working as is being shown, and not being just another fake. It may be blind faith, but it keeps me headed in that direction, in any case.
As you said, sometimes the experiment is the goal and the objective, instead of the outcome, or a commercial venture.
Good luck with your tests.
Nick_Z
Colman is the yoke and Akua and possibly Tariel Kapanadze.
The same concept
Excitation of unstable nuclei due to RF in NMR.
Please read Verpies posts in overunity

Quote:
Verpies:Yes, Auger electrons can be knocked out of atoms but their energy will not be higher than the absorbed photon energy (X-Ray), that caused it, thus no energy gain.
Perhaps a photon can get all the way to the nucleus and convert a neutron to proton (a mass conversion), causing the release of nuclear binding energy, yielding an actual gain.
According to the Reiss Howard paper and patent - even lower energy RF photons can affect nuclei that way
.

Quote:
Sparks:Those XRF analyzers are really good at determining the isotopic contents of elements heavier than Carbon.


Quote:
Slapper: thank you stivep:

wikipedia/cobalt, under characteristics, in the second paragraph:
Quote
The metal reacts with F2 at 520 K to give CoF3, with Cl2, Br2 and I2, the corresponding binary halides were formed. It has no reaction with H2 and N2 even when heated, but it does react with boron, carbon, phosphorus, arsenic and sulphur.[10]

haven't had a chance to view the referenced material so i'm not sure what they mean by 'does react with'.

but it looks like we could have an active state without adding any energy with just the phosphorus in the mix. i recall that there is some carbon in the mix as well?
so i'm curious if you've ever observed any hint of some spontaneous energy levels.

if this is the case the magnetic break is more of a necessity than an option. we'll want each active element to be placed between magnetic poles with the break normally on as opposed to normally off.
what type of electromagnet, or permanent magnet assembly would be best for this application.

i guess i can understand the role cadmium plays as it absorbs gamma; if that is what it does.

it's a real mind twister, for me, to visualize the fields developed in and around the tube. the copper and zinc would seem to produce different fields; one static and the other magnetic.
so can we say the copper/zinc not only help in passing energy through the mix, but also serve to polarize the direction of the particles that get released/emitted.

it will help to know so that we can aim to capture this energy in the most efficient way. i'm thinking washers slipped around the tube, at each copper/zinc junction that encloses the mix.

just posting out loud. i still haven't got around to playing with some barium titanate chunks i got in, like, over a month ago.

thanks for all the good posts guys.

take care.

nap.
Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

for more go to page up there



Can't a photon be blue shifted by matter. I forget the name some type of scattering which is quite the opposite of flurescense. And from whence did this energy gain come from? Is there any chance that electrons have actual orbital momentum a form of inertia which when altered generates photons?
R




Quote:
Quote from: slapper on May 02, 2013, 06:46:43 PM
so can we say the copper/zinc not only help in passing energy through the mix, but also serve to polarize the direction of the particles that get released/emitted.
Quote:
Verpies :Well yes, copper and zinc emit beta particles predominantly from the poles of their nuclei, so when their spin axes get polarized by a magnetic field - so does the the direction of the particles that get released/emitted.
Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze




This is the operating principle behind βNMR spectroscopy.


Read all material from the top of this theme.
As we do not know what TK did we may only assign that the most proper place ( if any) to hide Colman Compound is coil capacitor of steady state aquarium presentation of TK
Look at shiny center of that coil ( red color coil )



Wesley
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-03-2013, 05:14 PM
Jeff Pearson Jeff Pearson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Taos NM
Posts: 188
Yes be aware of the radioactivity. What level of dose does this thing put out and how/can it be shielded. But I don't think that should scare people tooo much as long as precautions are taken. Lets not forget the radiation we are exposed to on a daily basis from cell phones etc. I recently stripped a rear projection television and the thing had a plastic/lead shield behind the viewing screen to block the X-rays put out by the CRTs. I personally don't think we should be scared of this thing, just be aware.
Do you think you have the correct phosphorus??
Thank you for doing this..most of us dont have the fancy gear for monitoring radiation
You can find out what the tube emits and then determine shielding.
What is the wall thickness on the glass tubes you are using? Seems like we want to get thicker glass to replicate this since the tubes seem to be so easy to break
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-03-2013, 09:02 PM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Taos NM
Posts: 46
Yes be aware of the radioactivity. What level of dose does this thing put out and how/can it be shielded. But I don't think that should scare people tooo much as long as precautions are taken. Lets not forget the radiation we are exposed to on a daily basis from cell phones etc. I recently stripped a rear projection television and the thing had a plastic/lead shield behind the viewing screen to block the X-rays put out by the CRTs. I personally don't think we should be scared of this thing, just be aware.
Jeff
Quote:
Do you think you have the correct phosphorus??
Thank you for doing this..most of us dont have the fancy gear for monitoring radiation
You can find out what the tube emits and then determine shielding.
What is the wall thickness on the glass tubes you are using? Seems like we want to get thicker glass to replicate this since the tubes seem to be so easy to break
THERE IS NO NEED FOR ANYTHING SPECIAL WATCH VIDEO

software is free.









Understanding Spectroscopy is of help as it gives not only information about compound but transmutation prove after initial testing.
another prove of activation and impact nature made by radio waves.


Radioactive Sample Analysis - Gamma Spectroscopy
Radioactive Sample Analysis - Gamma Spectroscopy - YouTube


some more info:
1.As NYW group progress( Aidas Arunas/T-1000 Wesley/stivep)
Thanks to Aidas there is a lot of progress in NMR/transmutation of Yoke.
would not that be without the biggest brain in this- Arunas.
He is marvelously brilliant thinker.
As information are preliminary there is time needed for details.
Suffice it to say is that while I'm working on Colman they are working on yoke but not yoke as one - yoke as effect in ferrite.

And the got into revelation.
In the essence we all working on the same
NMR/Transmutation

I'm just afraid to say number( power) to do not look silly but I'm in big WOW.



=============================================


2.Conformation by member of Russian Academy of Science to Andrea Rossi cold fusion.
О демонстрации ядерных процессов для альтернативной энергетики. XLII Зигелевские Чтения 23.03.13 - YouTube!

It is important to remember that I state that Andrea Rossi is "most likely"
using thermal phenomenon associated with Colman patent 1956
Why is that important.
If it is proven than Patent rights of Rossi might be in jeopardy of being revoked.
The secret of Rossi is in secret additive "looks like" that is similar if not identical
in nature to Colman.
Additional benefit is that device than "might" be so simple to build comparing with Rossi to take approx 2 hours to assemble if components are handy.
=============================================
3.Perpetual Motion Test Could Amend Theory of Time
by: Natalie Wolchover

Perpetual Motion Test Could Amend Theory of Time

https://simonsfoundation.org/feature...heory-of-time/
read comments below the article.

Space-time crystal
Space-time crystal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Time Crystals Could Upend Physicists Theory of Time
'Time Crystals' Could Upend Physicists' Theory of Time | Wired Science | Wired.com

the same article but read the comments at the end.

Death-defying time crystal could outlast the universe
Death-defying time crystal could outlast the universe Forums

Quantum Time Crystals

Difficulties around the idea of spontaneous breaking of time translation symmetry in a closed quantum mechanical system are identified, and then overcome in a simple model. The possibility of ordering in imaginary time is also discussed
[1202.2539v2] Quantum Time Crystals



Physics - Crystals of Time

Researchers propose how to realize time crystals, structures whose lowest-energy states are periodic both in time and space

Update as of 5/3/2013 time 21:32 Video
Video & Audio: Frank Wilczek. Time Crystals - Metadata


Wesley
__________________
 

Last edited by stivep; 05-04-2013 at 01:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-07-2013, 05:55 PM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
a k u l a 0 0 8 3- Free Energy1150W part2
a k u l a 0 0 8 3- Free Energy1150W part2 - YouTube




You must see all 37 videos horrifying,

Event: breath taking
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ON UFO - link is below the picture frame of my video you tube video and here as well. !!

SHOCK AND SHOCKING - shock is going to be your feeling after watching series of 37 Videos
WORTH YOUR TIME. Videos are marked by hours - not days of publishing time- as this is happening now



Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure April 29th, 2013 - pt2
Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure April 29th, 2013 - pt2 - YouTube






Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure April 29th, 2013 pt1
Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure April 29th, 2013 pt1 - YouTube!



all video access:

TheTruthAmongstUs - YouTube



Wesley
__________________
 

Last edited by stivep; 05-07-2013 at 10:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-09-2013, 12:22 AM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Well..........................................

There is no longer congressional evidence of UFO

channel I was referring to is EMPTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheTruthAmongstUs - YouTube

no more SHOCK AND SHOCKING SHOCK...



from other news:
Romero ...............
after unexpected visit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Romero made statement:
Quote:
T H I S W A S A B I G F A K E, S T O P R E P L I C A T I N G
THIS IS MY LAST POST
World will be the same

SORRY!
Romero's Self-Sustaining Dynamo Drama


And that might happened to everyone of you including me
if they push for it.

That what greed is doing with people




WHEN THEY COME FOR YOU:

the good thing is that if you are being told that you black or withe or zebra or idiot or just trash....
you will admit that they are right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very next morning you are back to what needs to be finished.



Wesley
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-30-2013, 05:11 PM
stivep stivep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Precise recipe of Colman Compound in practice + assembly
done based on Colman patent + some of effects+ testing components used in experiment+ connection of testing apparatus.

Revolution has begun Free Energy exposed part 6



Revolution has begun Free Energy exposed part 6 - YouTube



Wesley
__________________
 

Last edited by stivep; 06-30-2013 at 05:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers