

![]() |
|
|||||||
| Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
||||
|
I was actually looking for direct quotes from Tesla in relation to the
transmission of energy with regard to his improved transmitter using longitudinal waves or whatever. Many things are surmised or confusingly lumped in together, Tesla showed two ways of wireless transmission, by atmosphere and by the ground. And radiant energy receivers are not the intended main receivers for transmissions from a transmitter. I disagree with this statement below, the idea for making and breaking the circuit in a radiant energy collector is to allow the energy to build before applying it, in most cases. Otherwise the current is feeble. Although a radiant energy receiver can in fact supply energy to a transmitter I don't see how it could effectively transmit as an oscillator and at the same time collect from the elevated terminal. Just because he did "other" experiments at Colorado Springs doesn't mean those other experiments were related to the actual transmission of energy. Quote from near the end. Quote:
Cheers |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
I think this Andre gives a very good overview of all instances where Tesla says something about the nature of radiation. He distinquishes a few forms.
When it comes to transmission of energy or electricity, he always says that 'Herzian waves' can not be used for this purpose. Herzian waves are those that we today would call transverse EM radiation. So it will have to be another form of radiation that he uses when he is talking about energy transfer through the air. (in most cases, I believe, Tesla uses the earth to transfer the energy. And I have read somewhere that the ionossphere mirrors earths potential fluctuations, and vice versa. This would make it possible to transfer energy through capacitive coupling. But I forgot where I read this.) Tesla clearly mentions that particle beams/radiation can be used for efficient energy transfer, but I believe in most cases he did not use this. From this point on, we can only guess what kind of radiation he was using. But by reconstructing his work we should be able to do some educated guess work. Ernst. |
|
|||
|
Forgot....
Tesla does mention that the waves he uses for energy transmission resemble sound waves. This is probably the statement that comes closest to what you are looking for? Sound waves are longitudinal as opposed to 'Herzian waves'. Ernst. |
|
||||
|
Yes well what of the quote I gave above, he clearly states the currents he
passes into the Earth are stored there as electromagnetic momentum, is this not analogous to a tank circuit ? Are the oscillations in a tank circuit "hertz" waves ? Or are the oscillations in a tank circuit EM radiation ? Or are they electromagnetic momentum of vibrations ? I don't think they are radiation. Resembling sound waves is "not" sound waves, just "like" sound waves. But I don't see how longitudinal waves are not recognized if sound waves are longitudinal. Sound waves resonate and reverberate and such whereas radiation does not. So any resonance in a tank is "like" sound waves. Seems like good Logic to me. Anyway the directed energy is a different concept to the transmission of energy with the patented transmitters. I think he just intended using the transmitters to transmit the energy to the energy directing device and/or control them (remotely) and/or to produce the enormous potential to run the energy directing apparatus.. The atmospheric transmissions he explains that the currents are transmitted by conduction. Nikola Tesla On His Work With Alternating Currents -- Chapter IV By direct quotes I mean to words written by Tesla or recorded from what he actually said, in context. Cheers |
|
|||||||
|
Ok Farmhand,
a more direct answer then ![]() Quote:
Quote:
Concerning the document I refered you to; I do not agree with the author of that document on many points. But when you are looking for quotes from Tesla on radiation then this document is a very good starting point. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'll try to find something for you. I feel you are trying to say that Tesla never used longitudinal electricity through the air, he was using longitudinal electricity through the earth... Is that right? Ernst. |
|
||||
|
Hi Ernst, I'm not looking for quotes from Tesla on radiation in particular, I'm
looking for quotes by Tesla on Longitudinal "waves" or such with respect directly to the operation of the Energy Transmitters patented for the transmission of energy by the atmospheric conduction or the ground currents. Nikola Tesla On His Work With Alternating Currents -- Chapter IV Demonstration for the patent examiner. Quote:
Quote:
The Earth currents travel by conduction as well, obviously, I just don't think there needs to be a second path back to the transmitter because of the terminal reference. Here is the quote on the process through the atmosphere it has a return through the Earth, I assume, it's not clearly stated. Quote:
the atmosphere and the Earth. For the wireless transmission of energy not using the atmosphere he used only one conductor, the Earth. At least that is how I see it in general. Oh I am taking your hint about the vector calculus and intend to begin study on some things. Cheers P.S. Now I forgot something. While it may be possible for radiation to bereflected/deflected, when we talk in terms of radiation leaving a system/device or radiation from a system/device I think it's gone by definition, I think true radiation only travels in one direction and is lost to the system which it originated from. Terms can be confusing, radiations can be emitted and collected but radiation goes in all directions. Directed beams of energy or particles are not radiations in my opinion. It's about control and intent. If there is an effective intentional direction of waves I don't think it is radiation. Radiation - radii. .. Last edited by Farmhand : 10-21-2012 at 04:16 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
- At Tesla's time there was less knowledge about the nature of the various forms of radiation. Today we distinquish transverse, longitudinal and particle (beta: electrons, alfa: protons, for example), but you can not expect someone in Tesla's time to do the same. - Tesla does clearly distinquish various forms of radiation, though. - Tesla does mention which forms of radiation can NOT be used for the transmission of energy - Tesla does describe various experiments in which energy is transmitted I do not think that a direct quote such as you are looking for exists. The best thing we can do is look at what we DO have and reconstruct it in todays terminology. On the experiment that you quote... That is a simulation experiment, that is why I said Quote:
On vector calculus: this was the (first of three) video that I thought is very helpful for visualising the concepts of div, grad and curl. Once you can visualise this, try to imagine the universe filled with ether and currents running through wires dragging ether outside the wire along. You can then see the vortices of magnetism appear. And of course the other way around. It will also become clear why a constant current induces a constant magnetic field, while a constant magnetic field does not induce potential differences and therefor no current. You need a change in magnetic 'speed' (either faster or slower) in order to create a potential difference. Then if you want more try to find a copy of "Div, grad, curl and all that". It is easy to read and more or less "all there is to it". Good luck! Ernst. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|