Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 150 118 90 78 45 SEATS LEFT - 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE

Monero XMR


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #2671  
Old 12-29-2017, 02:59 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
UFO
So if a phaseshift occurs inside your contraption, wich God forbids, then you have to buy a FIVE channel scope . . . . . . . . . Regards / Arne
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2672  
Old 12-29-2017, 03:16 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Oh you are so funny...

Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post
UFO
So if a phaseshift occurs inside your contraption, wich God forbids, then you have to buy a FIVE channel scope . . . . . . . . . Regards / Arne
Oh you are soooo funny Seaad!!!

You Better check your contraption for phase-shifting since you're driving it at such high speeds...

You have more chances to crash it than me...
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote
  #2673  
Old 12-29-2017, 03:53 PM
Listener192 Listener192 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 75
Rigol Scope

Hi UFO,

I have the DS1054Z and it will measure the average power of complex waveforms including distorted sines.

The DS1074B is a better scope as it has separate vertical controls for each channel, whereas the DS1054Z you have to press the channel button to access the vertical controls.

This becomes tiresome if you are using the scope to make a lot of measurements.

I use a Pintek DP-25 Differential Probe for voltage measurements, although I would change out the 9V DC power supply supplied with it as it is very noisy.
The differential probe is a must if you are making a lot of line voltage measurements and will save your scope from inadvertent damage.

I use a Hantek CC-65 AC/DC Current Clamp Meter, which is fairly accurate however beware of the battery running down. If you can justify something better I would go for that. I also have several laboratory shunts which I can use although the clamp is more convenient.

Regards

L192
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2674  
Old 12-29-2017, 05:00 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
Hi UFO,

I have the DS1054Z and it will measure the average power of complex waveforms including distorted sines.

The DS1074B is a better scope as it has separate vertical controls for each channel, whereas the DS1054Z you have to press the channel button to access the vertical controls.

This becomes tiresome if you are using the scope to make a lot of measurements.
Hello L192,

Yeah, but it is about double the price...

What about the same number but with a "Z" at end (DS1074Z)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
I use a Pintek DP-25 Differential Probe for voltage measurements, although I would change out the 9V DC power supply supplied with it as it is very noisy.
The differential probe is a must if you are making a lot of line voltage measurements and will save your scope from inadvertent damage.
WOW, that V-Probe is also "sweet", but almost as much as the 1054 Scope!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
I use a Hantek CC-65 AC/DC Current Clamp Meter, which is fairly accurate however beware of the battery running down. If you can justify something better I would go for that. I also have several laboratory shunts which I can use although the clamp is more convenient.

Regards

L192
Current Clamp is ok...range price 50-60 USD, pretty reasonable...

Thanks


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote
  #2675  
Old 01-18-2018, 06:51 PM
Listener192 Listener192 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 75
Any Results Yet

Hi UFO,

Its been some time, any results yet?

Regards

L192
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2676  
Old 01-22-2018, 01:37 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
My Progress...and Development.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
Hi UFO,

Its been some time, any results yet?

Regards

L192
Hello L192,

Not really, not yet...but, did I kept working on it?...yes, definitively.

I can not afford so far all the equipment to test according to your suggested method...but then again, if I have a definite OU in EXCESS, then all that equipment will not be required...right?

I have deviated a bit from my original coils-cores design...and going into a Toroidal core, where I would have both exciters and both secondaries...this way there would not be field losses like in an open or even in a closed but squared core.

The Toroid Geo keeps both fields traveling within, just changing vectors direction.

I have been exchanging mails with MM lately, and it seems he also had this idea way before I have come up with it:



Even though mine will not be EXACTLY as above...it pretty much contains the basic idea.

MM cuts (divide it in four sections) the toroid core...I believe it is not necessary to do it...plus as seen above, his exciters are longer than secondaries...mine are opposite, my exciters would be bulkier but shorter than secondaries.

On the wiring above, MM splits each exciter to send it to Part G...I do not,...I will wind them as a regular coil, back and forth in layers...then connect them both either in series or parallel (whichever way works better) then send wires to my reversing rotary switch.

In this set up I can test ALL magnetic interactions, first as Figuera's is believed he did, or N-N and S-S...or my reversed idea as is: N-S/S-N...then see which interaction would work best by testing.

I believe my excessive V Drop when loaded is due -mainly-to core geometry, which was open so far, then field losses from exciter could not keep up with secondaries-load demand.

I ordered a new part#190 toroid (as seen its spec's on CENTER image) which is on the way...but, I have decided to build a small "Toroid Winder"...it has always been one of my goals to achieve...so, am working on that machine now.

With a T-Winder is much simpler to turn the toroid according to my spec's of wire thickness and length...The winder is based on aluminum (no wood at all)...so I had to find the right machine shop to cut the main TWO big parts, since my lathe will not turn big diameter rings, nor I have a CNC to cut thick plates of 1/2"....as the smaller rollers and belt pulleys... I will make them myself.

So, yeah, it would be some kind of Figuera's TPU...

I am also getting my Server PC repaired so I can load future videos and images...I have some issues now with the PSU...so am replacing it with a bigger and better unit.

Now, my question is to ALL THE AUDIENCE HERE....:

Has anyone ELSE, besides ME...Have done any late testing and development then reach some positive results on this project so far?

Or is it just me, myself and I working here, while the rest seats down very comfortably waiting for my results?


Regards



Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 01-22-2018 at 02:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2677  
Old 01-22-2018, 04:05 PM
Listener192 Listener192 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 75
Other Experimenters Working on Figuera Concept

Hi UFO,

I can't allow myself to work on this until I see some test results that would justify this. I was hoping you were going to show test results on your last configuration, as you indicated that it was operating with O.U. but now you have moved on another configuration.

I am cautious of of patents, as many ideas are patented but never proven and the Figuera device seems to fall into this category. It was only your O.U. claim that kept me interested.

Regards

L192
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2678  
Old 01-22-2018, 06:05 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
Hi UFO,

I can't allow myself to work on this until I see some test results that would justify this.
Hi L192,

I see...so wait till "someone" would waste his time and money...fry his brains, brake his hands and his back, etc...to finally come up with the "final discovery" or the real way to make it happen...in order that others start making it?...

What a nice "way" to do business hahahahaha...except I believe I am on the wrong side...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
I was hoping you were going to show test results on your last configuration, as you indicated that it was operating with O.U. but now you have moved on another configuration.
I have not made ANY radical changes to my original config...except to coils and cores now.
I still have a very functional single brush rotary switch, which all it needs is to be "plugged in" just like we replace a light bulb...
All I have done are improvements (may call it "upgrades" if it sounds better) to original Figuera's config.

I was and still am operating with an OU Device with either one or four brush system...all am doing is making it greater as outputting more than I had in prior sets.

Ever have seen a Factory built PSU (that could apply to ANY Equipment, Tool or Appliance) that all the sudden goes bad?...and the symptoms are EXACTLY as the ones I have right now?...A considerable voltage drop when loaded?

Normally for an experienced repair technician...what would be that cause?...simple, first thing they will look for are Caps which are swollen and bad...they drop V as PSU is loaded, so it can not keep up with load demand.

As it could be many more things, depending on the technology PSU we are looking at...sometimes a FET about to go bad(because of weaker inner insulating film) will give similar symptoms...

Even with a Service Manual, all kind of testing equipment...most Technicians will use the "Bazooka Approach"...or "Replace'em all" technique...

Well, that is exactly what I am doing with my set(s), except that I am all by myself here...and there are no "Service Manuals" where I could go and check the "OEM" Circuits and which one of the components could be the wrong or "bad" one...

I could go with another example, much more related to what I am working on...

Get ANY Home Generator and replace its Exciter Cap by one of SAME SPEC'S but that is "JUST NOT REACHING or NOT KEEPING TOP CAPACITANCE"* as OEM Spec's, meaning not reaching the top Voltage to generate the proper excitation...then what would happen?

*Could even be a good Cap, but under-rated to OEM Spec's.

You start that gen, and it shows top voltage...120V...or 240...NOW, go ahead and load it...what happens?

It drops Voltage...simple

To me is enough that I get Output 150V (no load), and measuring Amps out (by radical short with INLINE meter), I get like 6-7 A, while only spending 60V and 2A at Input.

Isn't that an OU "sign"?

Isn't that enough to motivate MANY HERE to at least "give it a try"?

The fact that V Out drops too much under load, could be just due to any wrong configuration within A PART of the whole set.

Now, once it is found...is perfect.

But that is NOT the issue...the issue here is that in order to faster find what is wrong with a particular set, to then repair it and make it work beautifully...depends basically on a:

TEAM WORK.

But that is dreaming much higher and beyond Free Energy existence...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
I am cautious of of patents, as many ideas are patented but never proven and the Figuera device seems to fall into this category. It was only your O.U. claim that kept me interested.

Regards

L192
No Patent can EVER be considered as a "BUILDING MANUAL"...otherwise it would have absolutely ZERO LEGAL PROTECTION.

ANY Patent is written in the MOST GENERAL LEGAL TERMS their Lawyers could find...in order to offer a legal protection to the "Intellectual Art" within it.

Figuera's is NO EXCEPTION, as He, himself, writes very clearly that ALL DRAWINGS AND EXPLANATIONS are nothing but only EXAMPLES...to "have an idea" about his Invention.

And..."EXAMPLES" are not the REAL WAY to go and build, of course...and will never, ever, get you to make it perfectly from just an example...

However, I am glad I kept you interested with my previous posts...and I am sorry if I have disappointed you (or others here) in any way lately.


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 01-22-2018 at 06:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2679  
Old 01-23-2018, 03:55 AM
Cornboy 555's Avatar
Cornboy 555 Cornboy 555 is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 803
Hey UFO and all, i am still plugging away at this, but very time poor at the moment, with soooo much farm work.

Am still working on 96 bar internal commutator, to supply G every second turn, still with a split Netica winding.

My G is closely wound with 2mm wire, hoping to create enough induction in the toroid to limit the current flow.
Will post on any progress as it happens.

Best regards Cornboy
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2680  
Old 01-23-2018, 12:07 PM
Listener192 Listener192 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 75
Results of your work already completed

Hi UFO,

My point on patents is that people do patent concepts that they have not tested and just because a concept has a patent it does not mean that it works.

My own simple experiment regarding the ideas that Figuera had, was interesting but not convincing enough to warrant deviating from other projects I am working on.

As for the work you have already completed on your previous configuration, the one you claimed O.U. on, I would have thought that you would be going all out to demonstrate test results that would support that finding. I agree that having sufficient test equipment to perform these tests is expensive, but would really save investment in time, exploring avenues that don't yield positive results.

Most claims of O.U. turn out to be measurement errors.

Regards

L192
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2681  
Old 01-23-2018, 03:47 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
Hi UFO,
Hi L192,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
My point on patents is that people do patent concepts that they have not tested
I am sorry but you can NOT speak for ALL Patents out there, since there are MANY which have been tested and proven before even filling an Application for a Patent...For example, I can cite myself on that list, I have a Motor and Generator Combination Patent, where I previously build a prototype, called in legal terms "Specimen".


Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
...and just because a concept has a patent it does not mean that it works.
Yes, I agree above, as there are many who just write an idea and then Patent it...However, I do not believe it is the individual's or "idealist" inventor's fault...but the Patent Procedure Application System which is wrong...It should be enforced, in order to apply for an Utility Patent, to INCLUDE a Specimen as part of the procedure.

But neither You nor Me or anyone else here could change that system established for too long...reason why we see such stupid patents filling up all the data search.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
My own simple experiment regarding the ideas that Figuera had, was interesting but not convincing enough to warrant deviating from other projects I am working on.
I believe that's a "start up" error...bold and underlined above..."simple experiments" would never reveal that it works for real, basically in Energy Generation Systems derived from Electromagnetism.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
As for the work you have already completed on your previous configuration, the one you claimed O.U. on, I would have thought that you would be going all out to demonstrate test results that would support that finding.
Sorry but I have not "completed" absolutely nothing yet. Reason why I still have ALL previous configurations as components very "functional".

1- My first successful configuration was done with a single-positive brush driver (Just like Figuera exampled), exciting just one Coil and another one paralleled to it (Bifilar) with a Cap in a closed tank circuit, projecting an alternate field to primary exciter one, I have shown results, pictures and explanations on how it was put together with full spec's in previous posts here.

On above set up, I have tried several coils-cores combinations, as different spec's wires, turns, layers, etc,etc. However, I have not go back to that switching system again to test my newer sets which I have done by Field Reversals.

2- I put together a second driver, which I have shown also here, where I have tested several coils-cores as well, with this Field Reversals method.

I just have written (described) all above experiments in a VERY BRIEF WAY...As they have consumed several hours of work, brain frying plus money in materials and labor.

Unfortunately I had the PC issues, which I have still not being able to fully resolved as of NOW, which has prevented me from uploading all corresponding testing and results videos. That PC was the Main and faster one I had, designed to run all software graphics and animations I have rendered here previously.

Right now I have been working on a very slow PC, just able to load pic's and write here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener192 View Post
I agree that having sufficient test equipment to perform these tests is expensive, but would really save investment in time, exploring avenues that don't yield positive results.

Most claims of O.U. turn out to be measurement errors.

Regards

L192
That basically "applies" whenever we have very slight differences between I/O, when we need sophisticated equipment and tools to demonstrate our small measurements "above" Input are really OU...and even so, what we would be generating is a "measurement war" here....IMHO, NOT WORTHY IT.

After I am done with PC work and getting it back running again, then I will start getting up to date on my YT Chanel, then posting them all here.


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 01-23-2018 at 03:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2682  
Old 01-23-2018, 03:53 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy 555 View Post
Hey UFO and all, i am still plugging away at this, but very time poor at the moment, with soooo much farm work.

Am still working on 96 bar internal commutator, to supply G every second turn, still with a split Netica winding.

My G is closely wound with 2mm wire, hoping to create enough induction in the toroid to limit the current flow.
Will post on any progress as it happens.

Best regards Cornboy

Hello old friend!!

Yes I know...life friend, that's the way it is.

But I know you will finally get to it and so prove it works or not...


Kind Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote
  #2683  
Old 01-23-2018, 06:24 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
-
Listener192: "and just because a concept has a patent it does not mean that it works"
If I remember right hanon told us, in some post, that a working unit (with OU??) was made and shown to the patent office. This was a must to get the patent issued. Correct me if I'm wrong.

"the one you claimed O.U. on, I would have thought that you would be going all out to demonstrate test results that would support that finding"

But s**t happens! The time will give us the answer.
Open secondary with high Volts and the same made short cut with many Amps is not OU. I normally put a resistor across the output poles. Adjust it to give half the open Volts value. Thats mostly near optimal output. Then I use that reading to compare with the input values to see if I got OU. . . .But I have certainly misunderstood you UFO?

"Most claims of O.U. turn out to be measurement errors."
Thats right! In my case I used a formula suited for a normal transformer at my Bi-toroid-type transformer. Volt x Amp x Cos Thats probably wrong. But I have a bunch of guys beside me. Thane Heinz, Bill Alek, Bro . . .Normal transformers have Primary and Secondary on the same and only core.

UFO: "When I am to prove OU, I go based on the Power Known Parameters, which are simply Voltage and Amperage from Input versus Voltage and Amperage at Output, which could easily obtain Wattage on both I/O levels, just by simply multiplying VXI=W."
I agree to that. But it's not always possible.

Regards / Arne
__________________
 

Last edited by seaad; 01-23-2018 at 06:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2684  
Old 01-23-2018, 07:07 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post
-

...Open secondary with high Volts and the same made short cut with many Amps is not OU. I normally put a resistor across the output poles. Adjust it to give half the open Volts value.
It is NOT just about reading higher voltages with no load...it is about Voltages Drops but NEVER reaching zero value (meaning, NEVER completely dead), NOPE!...to the point I can run AC Tools, like a fan or a drill, or a saw, etc,etc.

But I grasped something very interesting you wrote above..."Adjust the Load Resistor"?...Now, I know you work with micro-voltages and milli-amps (no pun intended, honestly...)...Are you referring to a potentiometer?

I find it interesting, since we would be able to regulate the load resistance, (like a variable load unit does, but that costs a fortune) then from there run the proper Ohms Law Calculations, measuring V Drop at terminals as amperage in series with variable resistor (potentiometer)...am I right?

In my set up I would have to search for a specific higher wattage variable resistor (I have been searching for it previously for other uses, and they are also pretty hefty in price) which could run without burning up.


Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post
Thats mostly near optimal output. Then I use that reading to compare with the input values to see if I got OU. . . .But I have certainly misunderstood you UFO?

Regards / Arne
Nope, You did not misunderstand me at all.

What you may have missed...is that I do not get V drops to zero, not even when I short with amp meter...I have shown pics about it previously..remember?

Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote
  #2685  
Old 01-23-2018, 08:41 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
But I grasped something very interesting ..Are you referring to a potentiometer?

but that costs a fortune

What you may have missed...is that I do not get V drops to zero, not even when I short with amp meter
About potentiometers. I'm using potentiometers very seldom. I'm using them to make rough measurements. Then I measure the pot value and change to a (some) fixed resistor(s) with nearest standard value, in parallel or in series if needed.

At your low speeds it is possible to use bulbs but you have to calibrate them first and make a graph showing the relationship between voltage and current (at different Hz, mean values there). You have to be aware that bulbes are non linjer fellows which flickers at low speeds meaning that the Ohms fluctuates.
At higher frequencies you have to include the coil (filament) existing inside the bulb ==> impedance (R & L).

When you short cut the output with an amperage meter you are using the amperage meter built-in resistance (some Ohm / mOhms) across the poles. That's why you have some volts remaining there.

As you know I'm searching for the OU Effect so I'm reading now earlier posts in the Figuera thread. And this is a taste test which I think suits you and bistander except for the 3-phase angles.
https://www.google.com/patents/US20020125774

Regards / Arne
__________________
 

Last edited by seaad; 01-24-2018 at 08:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2686  
Old 01-25-2018, 04:08 AM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,025
Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post
...

As you know I'm searching for the OU Effect so I'm reading now earlier posts in the Figuera thread. And this is a taste test which I think suits you and bistander except for the 3-phase angles.
https://www.google.com/patents/US20020125774

Regards / Arne
Thanks for the interesting patent. It uses the 3-phase stator winding from a motor (or generator) to produce a rotating magnetic field. The rotor is replaced with a stationary iron member. There is no physical (mechanical) motion in the resultant machine. Yet it produces a rotating magnetic field when excited by a 3-phase source. I tried to explain this method to Ufopolitics when he started experimenting with moving fields in stationary cores.

The patent claims that this rotating magnetic field can "generate" power in a winding which can be used to do work while also replacing the original excitation source. In other words, once started, it becomes a standalone electrical power source with no inputs, electrical, mechanical or otherwise.

I wonder why this was never brought to market. It's like 16 years old. Just a few years left on the protection. And I imagine not too difficult to work around the weak (IMO) claims. Like isn't it essentially a wound rotor induction motor with a locked rotor? Or for that matter, like an alternator with a locked rotor?

Regards,

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2687  
Old 01-25-2018, 08:16 AM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
Thanks for your response bi.

The main question here is: Does the "secondary" windings (locked squirrel cage windings) really perceive the non moving member and its rotating magnetic field(s) in the same way as a real magnetized rotating member with atoms and all flying by?
The whole thing is just a wery complicated "transformer" anyhow!

In the squirrel cage motor the squirrel cage is always lazy and goes slower than the rotating fields.
Maybe this can be arranged by making the rotating exciter magnetic field go ahead the secondary with some degees (90 - 180) in the generator without moving parts. Or even faster =Hz depending of the load?

Regards / Arne
__________________
 

Last edited by seaad; 01-25-2018 at 11:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2688  
Old 01-25-2018, 04:15 PM
boguslaw's Avatar
boguslaw boguslaw is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Thanks for the interesting patent. It uses the 3-phase stator winding from a motor (or generator) to produce a rotating magnetic field. The rotor is replaced with a stationary iron member. There is no physical (mechanical) motion in the resultant machine. Yet it produces a rotating magnetic field when excited by a 3-phase source. I tried to explain this method to Ufopolitics when he started experimenting with moving fields in stationary cores.

The patent claims that this rotating magnetic field can "generate" power in a winding which can be used to do work while also replacing the original excitation source. In other words, once started, it becomes a standalone electrical power source with no inputs, electrical, mechanical or otherwise.

I wonder why this was never brought to market. It's like 16 years old. Just a few years left on the protection. And I imagine not too difficult to work around the weak (IMO) claims. Like isn't it essentially a wound rotor induction motor with a locked rotor? Or for that matter, like an alternator with a locked rotor?

Regards,

bi
Looks like TPU ;-) Something like this was patented before in 40-ties if I remember correctly but only for one phase.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2689  
Old 01-27-2018, 06:30 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post

...When you short cut the output with an amperage meter you are using the amperage meter built-in resistance (some Ohm / mOhms) across the poles. That's why you have some volts remaining there.

Regards / Arne
Hello Seaad,

Oh, your guess above sounds so "coherent", as it also makes sense...

HOWEVER, what about if I tell you that still is above zero volts when radically shorting out without Ammeter shorting it?...but just the two output wires from the secondary coil twisted together?



So, no resistance from meter now (still connected but shorted terminals, so zero amps at its digital screen as seen above)...and still voltage does not drops to zero, V= Left Meter?

You can see Scope Blue Chanel (Output) showing the small square wave...Yellow Chanel is Input.

We only have left the resistance from the secondary coil being outputting the voltage under short?

Please, be my guest, explain it now...


Take care


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 01-27-2018 at 06:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2690  
Old 01-27-2018, 07:15 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
UFO
Some Ohms left somewhere hiding inside yor magpies nest! Pls make a diagram with meters + FWB plotted.
Magn. ind. between cables / probes?? I have got faulty readings (angles) when earth part from probes goes near coil even with my in your eyes tiny currents.

Regards / Arne
__________________
 

Last edited by seaad; 01-27-2018 at 08:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2691  
Old 01-28-2018, 08:44 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
Summary

In my pursuit of the Figuera OU Effect I have found some parts in the patens texts more important/ interesting than others, according to me. (Right now ) . . . See A, B, C below.
Much of the talk about resistance, commutators and such are lots lots of patent 'smoke'. And is more or less; education in how to make current variation. And even the wiring circuitsery / sketches. They are just sketches. In the patents you can read: " what is sought is the patent for the application of this principle " !


A)
(1908) " circulates a proper current, which is taken from one foreign
origin into one or more electromagnets, magnetize one or more
electromagnets"

" and while the current is higher or lower the magnetization of
the electromagnets ((one or more)) is decreasing or increasing and varying"

B)
(1914) " but in no case is there any communication between the induced coil
and the inductor coil "

C)
(1914) " and we will collect from these induced ((y)) the resulting
phenomena experienced from those inductors. ((N, S)) "



A) One or more electromagnets
Here is a situation of Rotating/ Vandering Magnetic Fields possible. Or just varying the amount of something.

See even the patent dicussion some post above. The Rotating Magn. Fields OU genny.
https://www.google.com/patents/US20020125774

1) Just connect a current/ voltage variation to all electromagnets simultaneously/ alternately, (parallel, series or groups).
2) Or connecting to One electromagnet after a another, consecutively. Back and forth, back and forth.
3) Connecting/ adding to more and more electromagnets in parallel or series. And disconnect/ subtract coils one by one backwards again.

At 2) and 3) a rapid current variation can be working at the same time as "the consecutively" or "the more and more" electromagnets is to be conneted step by step in a slower rate. And here the discussion of " make before breake " maybe comes in. It can maybe be important that the next coil is connected previous the disconnection of the first in a situation of Vandering Magnetic Fields?

B) No communication y ==> (N, S)
I have conducted a test closely related to the "2SGen" 2SGen, an amazing tiny Solid State Generator by JL Naudin

In my test I could not achieve NOT y ==> (N, S) (One direction Only) but instead NOT y <==> (N, S) (bi-directional non-connection)

As J. Naudin I used a fully wound toroid as input coil (N, S) and a large width wounded coil(loop) as output coil (y) around the toroid as a equatorial belt around the toroid-"belly" .
With a Sinus signal connected to the input toroid coil. No signal at all could be measured from the surrounding output coil!
But when some neodymium magnets where placed on the side of the toroid core a strong signal comes from the loopcoil (output). The same in opposit direction if (y) was used as input!
With the input coil in parallel resonance I achieved a 75% transfer Input to Output with this a simple experiment.


C) Phenomena from inductor coils (N, S)
Here the author just say that some phenomena (OU??) originates/ arises from from the primary side. And the secondary coils/reels (y) just collects the energy.
How and What is the questions?


Regards / Arne
__________________
 

Last edited by seaad; 01-29-2018 at 10:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2692  
Old 02-08-2018, 09:30 AM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
The show goes on

Clemente Figuera

Clemente Figuera

Regards / Arne
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2693  
Old 03-03-2018, 01:36 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
Here is another impressive system similar to Figuera. Working as I think according to my A)-thoughts in post #2691 above.

170 watts in - 1600 watts out - looped - Very impressive build and video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYlU4UNz6EE&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf-PL6j84vU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_-xw_hL8nQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1abEsE4R3U

Regards / Arne
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2694  
Old 03-03-2018, 03:00 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post
Hello Arne, thanks for the videos and info!

Well..."The Principle" behind those whole bunch of wires plus hardware, is very simply and GENERALLY DEFINED AS:

"A MOVEMENT OF THE MASSLESS, TRANSPARENT (TO OUR EYES), WEIGHTLESS AND VIRTUAL MAGNETIC FIELD(S)"

In the case you have shown, we just replace "MOVEMENT" by a "ROTATION" in above sentence, to make it "more specific" to this application.

Something that I have been telling about, over and over and then more over and over in THIS WHOLE FORUM for a LONG TIME.

If you want to understand what he is doing...it is simply demonstrated (even though pretty rough) by his piece of wood with two rotary magnets (First Video)...and so when he inserts it within the MOTOR STATOR CORE, then we see the two small magnets spinning...I did that, done that before.

He is using Arduino Microprocessor plus a bunch of transistors, plus a bunch of relays, just to achieve the SEQUENTIAL EXCITATION OF EACH COIL IN THE MOTOR (STATOR) FRAME...


And so, he is STORING all the Energy in the 18 SUPERCAPS, in order to allow the "JUMP" or use that circuit as a TRANSFER SWITCH, which allows the SELF OPERATION of the whole machine.

To me, IMHO... just the fact that the System is able to SELF-SUSTAIN, is a GREAT ACHIEVEMENT, REGARDLESS OF OU OR NOT.

What I liked about his setup, is the AC MOTOR STATOR which have -ALREADY BUILT IN- sequenced and OVERLAPPED COILS, and obviously He is exciting each one in a continuous, sequenced order with a DC FIELD coming from his Relays Output...Relays get the spikes back and not Transistors, which I suppose only actuate the relays low voltage coils, to close circuit on the Higher Voltage end of relays.

An easier way to do this would be to have all sequenced coils with a COMMON TERMINAL, then exciting independently each other terminal in sequence...as I can see he is got a TWO POLE ROTOR from a Gen Head, so, it would be very wise to activate simultaneously TWO COILS at 180 and rotate that pattern.

Figuera does all that "rotation" with just a single brush, small motor and the commutator...way more simplified...except Figuera "spreads" sequence into separated coils and not within same armature-core like he did on his setup.

Concluding DIFFERENCES, that Figuera generates a LINEAR MOVEMENT OF FIELD(S), while this guy here maintains a ROTARY SEQUENCE OF THE FIELD(S)...of course, talking about the "EXCITING FIELD(S)"...or "Primaries" if anyone prefer.

Finally, the bulky coil he inserts within MOTOR STATOR, connected to gauge and to AC OUTLET, like I mentioned above, is from a Generator Head Rotor...like I have done as well.

It would be very interesting to see the Signal he is sending to the Stators with a Scope, at least just a couple of them...

Now, the main issue that I see here...is that he is constantly collapsing and rising NEW FIELDS which generates kind of a "SIMULATED ROTATION" but in reality it is NEVER, like is done in a Rotary Generator Head...where the SAME DC FIELD IS ALWAYS CONSTANT AND NEVER COLLAPSING, but only VARYING IN "SPACE-TIME FIELD"


My two pennies worth...


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 03-03-2018 at 03:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2695  
Old 03-03-2018, 03:29 PM
seaad's Avatar
seaad seaad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 228
I have toggled the film frame by frame and found that it is always between 6 -12 relay LEDs lit simultaneously. . . . . 10 12 10 10 6 8 10 10 8 6 10 .... 6 8 10 10 10 8 8 8 8 8 12 10 12 8 8

It's not only a simple coil connection sequence!
Read also at , Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy , about the doubts to the relay freq compared with showed output frequency 60.6 Hz !!

Regards / Arne
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2696  
Old 03-03-2018, 03:41 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by seaad View Post

....
At 2) and 3) a rapid current variation can be working at the same time as "the consecutively" or "the more and more" electromagnets is to be conneted step by step in a slower rate. And here the discussion of " make before brake " maybe comes in. It can maybe be important that the next coil is connected previous the disconnection of the first in a situation of Vandering Magnetic Fields?

....

Regards / Arne
Definitively, the way that Figuera does that "make before break" is by having Brush contact TWO ELEMENTS in Commutator...

This allows the "simulation" of MOVING FIELDS to be OVERLAPPED (Applied to the Rotary Pattern in the Patent you showed before, NOT in Figuera, since it is LINEAR)

HOWEVER, when Two Coils are energized at the same time, even for a millisecond, the Current I, suffers a "fluctuation" AFFECTING the COMMON MOVING FIELD PROJECTION (generated by a SINGLE COIL)...which in my understanding is NOT GOOD for Induction purposes.

It works though...but not the way we all wished to...


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 03-03-2018 at 03:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
clemente, figuera, re-inventing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers