Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #871  
Old 08-24-2016, 12:13 AM
Wistiti Wistiti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadman View Post
Originally posted by matu at OU regarding the Figuera magnetic circuit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crq9j-f6Z7g

Regards
CM
Again!:
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #872  
Old 08-24-2016, 09:10 AM
hanon1492 hanon1492 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 463
More OU devices with poles in repulsion. Look carefully their polarities and compare them with Clemente Figuera 1908 patent:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150704...chleuniger.htm


Link to the webpage in PDF translated into english


Bucking coils



Hans Coler



Daniel Dingel (or Dingle)



Floyd Sweet (VTA)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #873  
Old 08-29-2016, 01:41 AM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
It is actually very easy to see why Figuera chose DC over AC.
all you have to do is make two column's for each one, one positive aspects and one negative. you will see the negative aspects under AC fill up rather fast as does DC positive aspects.
DC electromagnets are far superior to AC electromagnet on many levels and remain in the knee of the hysteresis curve reaching efficiency levels unobtainable by AC, plain and simple. then by varying the currant slightly with part G, a constant E field is attained in the same relative space of the secondary from both primary electromagnets, just as Maxwell and Faraday had predicted and William Hooper had proven 70 years later.
no fairytale pixi dust needed like in other proposals, just a simple part G magnetic device that splits the currant into two separate feeds from opposing magnetic fields, allowing each feed to be varied in currant in complete unison.
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 08-29-2016 at 02:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #874  
Old 09-02-2016, 10:36 AM
citfta's Avatar
citfta citfta is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,323
Hi marathonman,

I tried following the thread on OU for a while but got tired real quick of all the arguing about which way was the best way to build this device. I just reread again your excellent description of how the device works. I have studied the drawings quite a bit also and I agree with your assessment of how it works. My question is has anyone actually built a modern version of this device and gotten it to work? And has anyone come up with a relatively easy way to make this device solid state? I have some ideas about that but as the title says why reinvent the wheel if someone else has already got a nice solid state circuit designed. I am thinking a couple of power transistors driven in class A amplifier mode by two sine waves 180 degrees apart should allow you to control both coils as you describe. Thanks for any info you can share.

I disagree with you on one point. Overall AC has a lot more advantages than DC. But in certain situations and devices DC has the advantage and this device is certainly one of those.

Carroll
__________________
Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone. This means YOU especially BroMikey.
Reply With Quote
  #875  
Old 09-02-2016, 03:59 PM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs up replication

Yes, there has been a replication of the 1908 patent but unfortunately he does not or rather will not come forward. i guess he is protecting his family and i can respect that.
according to him, he took an 100 amp alternator that has brushes built into the fan hub assembly and converted it into part G controller. he said the key to non sparking was the grinder he used to grind a flat spot on the wire face. he said he ground it at the speed which the device operated at and that the finished device had so little wear in operation that he was completely taken by surprise.

after months and months of intense study of part G, it's rotation and interactions with the rest of the system, i realized i could use PNP transistors on the high side to mimic the rotation of the brush. in a make before break set up, i could replace the rotating brush to make the system completely non moving and still function just like the original part G should all while allowing the receding electromagnet's inductive kick back into part G as it is shoved out of the secondary core to allow self sustainment. if one was to place taps at certain intervals around the core with PNP Mosfets in a make before break scenario, rotation could be completely synthesized and operate in the same manor as the original device parameters.

i have designed a timing board to allow an adjustment of the make before break timing and the power Mosfet board but i'm not ready to place it in prime time just yet, still need a few tweeks. the cooling fins can be had on ebay for a decent price but the power Mosfets are really expensive.


PS. i forgot to tell you, the device replication has been running for a year and a half at 5 kilowatt output with plans to expand to 15 kilowatt to be completely grid free.

MM
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-02-2016 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #876  
Old 09-03-2016, 07:30 PM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs up pcb manufacture

I have found and use this pcb board manufacturer. the quality is good, the prices are unbelievably low and shipping is very prompt. i have used them for about a year now and i am VERY pleased with their service. if you need any boards made, do yourself a favor and check em out, you won't be sorry. the link is to their web site is below.

China PCB Prototype & Fabrication Manufacturer - PCB Prototype the Easy Way
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #877  
Old 09-03-2016, 08:40 PM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs up timing board

Cifta;

The timing circuit i chose is a Schmitt inverter ic through an AND then decade counters. the output is protected by high power Photodarlington Output Optocouplers. i also gave the board the ability to adjust the make before break timing giving me a little more control. i chose to mount the high power PNP Mosfets on a separate board so i can have maximum thermal management, encasing the two fin sets to form a tunnel to be cooled by a set of fans in a push pull set up. the fan control board i designed allows me to use three fan sets if so needed with thermal adjustments to be set for what ever temp i so choose.
by the design parameters i so chose, i will have the ability to completely mimic the rotation of the original part G device while maintaining all it's proper functions while remaining motionless in it's operation.

contrary to certain Figuera followers, part G can "NOT" be omitted if self sustainment is to be the goal. if the inductive kick back from the declining electromagnet being shoved out the secondary is not preserved and stored for later use, then self sustainment will NEVER be attained. you will end up with a device that needs a constant power supply and that is not what we want. then all you have left is a complicated "transformer" but certain individuals can not grasp this concept of reality and so chose the easier path of ignorance and deception instead of studying and researching the patents in depth.

MM
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-03-2016 at 09:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #878  
Old 09-03-2016, 08:47 PM
citfta's Avatar
citfta citfta is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,323
That sounds good. I am looking forward to seeing how that turns out for you.

Take care,
Carroll
__________________
Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone. This means YOU especially BroMikey.
Reply With Quote
  #879  
Old 09-03-2016, 10:01 PM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs up designs

The design software i use is DipTrace, first pic is timing board (work in progress) second pic is PNP power Mosfets on separate board ( good to go) and third pic is thermal fan controller board.
moving forward.
Attached Images
File Type: png Timing board.PNG (232.1 KB, 33 views)
File Type: png PNP Power Mosfet's for part G.PNG (148.6 KB, 28 views)
File Type: png Thermal Fan controller.PNG (88.2 KB, 31 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #880  
Old 09-04-2016, 12:32 AM
sprocket sprocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by marathonman View Post
I have found and use this pcb board manufacturer. the quality is good, the prices are unbelievably low and shipping is very prompt. i have used them for about a year now and i am VERY pleased with their service. if you need any boards made, do yourself a favor and check em out, you won't be sorry. the link is to their web site is below.

China PCB Prototype & Fabrication Manufacturer - PCB Prototype the Easy Way
Wow, they are cheap! I nearly electrocuted myself not long ago building mains-powered stuff on veroboard. This would seem a safer route! Thanks for the link.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #881  
Old 09-04-2016, 04:58 AM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Question part G

Turion;
While resistors may seem tempting they do nothing but get hot, waste power and high power resistors are damn expensive. in the patent, the device is shown in it's most elementary form (resistor) for understanding of the function and never states resistors, as in plural sense and is connected to the commutator bars thus to set N and set S.
the only other way to resist currant in Figuera's time was through the use of a magnetic field in which he used in part G.
that is why part G has a core;
1. to use two opposing magnetic time varying fields to change currant intensity in complete unison.
2. to store the inductive kick back from the receding electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary.
if you negate #2 your device will never achieve self sustainment, part G is mandatory.

just something to think about in your journey.

sprocket;
your welcome.
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-04-2016 at 05:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #882  
Old 09-04-2016, 05:13 PM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs up Blast from the past

This video i found is from Barcelona Spain in 1908, the time of Figuara's patent #44267 as he was living their at the time. i can not tell if the street lights were DC or not but by observing the video and the technology, i would say yes, they were using DC then. it doesn't really matter because i know the 1908 device is DC ran.
take a ride from the eyes of the master. Mr Figuera himself.
ps. tram cars are DC driven.

A Ride Through Barcelona 101 Years Ago
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-05-2016 at 04:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #883  
Old 09-04-2016, 06:24 PM
Mario's Avatar
Mario Mario is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 423
Hi Marathonman,

I have seen some info about this device on the P.J Kelly handbook but never really looked at it in detail. After having read your explanation a few posts ago I tried to get an idea of what is needed to accomplish the needed action in the coils.
Maybe I'm oversimplifying things, so correct me if I'm off…

We want the 2 opposing power coils to basically alternate each other. While N is turned ON its magnetic field starts building up in a ramp, at the same time coil S has been turned OFF and its field is decreasing. We want to be able to collect and store the energy of the 2 collapsing fields.

The easiest way I can think of is to use power mosfets. The one driving the first coil with a 50% duty cycle square wave, the one of the second with the inverse square wave of the first. Even better is to be able to control the duty cycles in sync, for that we could use a SG1524 or similar dual flip flop chip as a drive signal.
To collect the collapsing field of each coil we could make the coils bifilar and use the second wire to collect back to the battery via diode. Or make a half bridge mosfet setup for each coil and collect from the power coil directly via diodes back to the battery.

I think the square wave signal could work, as the current rises in a steady ramp and so is the decrease if routed back to the battery. Depending on size and load impedance, frequency and duty cycle could be adjusted. The magnetic fields strengths would be similar to the crossfade of 2 audio tracks.

just some thoughts,

Mario
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #884  
Old 09-05-2016, 03:22 AM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs down Timing

No sir, that would be incorrect.
the two primary sets are taken up and down in opposition in unison causing the formation of a double strength E field. notice i said "UNISON" because without the exact timing of both primaries one taken up, while the other down, induction will fall to the peak of the increasing electromagnet. currant is only reduced enough to clear the secondary then raised again while the other is reduced.....never off !
see both primary magnetic fields are occupying the same relative space in space, causing the two motional electric fields to form in the same direction complimenting each other so when the unison motion is broken, induction will fall to the peak of one electromagnet. this very fact has eluded many replicators to the point of putting the research down when in their frustration they failed to realize this very fact.

also, there is no collapsing field to be collected in the Figuera device "EVER". if bemf is present, induction will fall to the peak of one. as the increasing electromagnet basically shoves the decreasing electromagnet out of the secondary, the energy in that confined space of the core will be shoved out the back of the primary feeding part G's core being stored like an inductor, to be used in the next half rotation of the brush. this very action allows the Figuera device to be self sustaining.
part G's opposing fields allows this action to take place blocking the field energy from draining out, thus allowing the declining electromagnet to feed it every half turn of the brush.

i would suggest you study all figuera patents before you attempt replication or further postings to grasp the concept of Figuera's dream device.
go to Hanon's web site and download all the patents and study till your eyes bulge out.

if you have any questions please feel free to contact me and i will explain the best i can. i have 10's of thousands of hrs study and research in the Figuera device, basically devoted my life to it.

MM
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-05-2016 at 04:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #885  
Old 09-05-2016, 03:58 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,132
I see many people popping in on this thread over a LONG period of
time with each person pointing out with dramatics their thoughts on the
subject. Then the guys like me get lost wondering which way to turn
or thinking that maybe someone out of all these people could throw
together a quick video or even lay out an experiment that shows the
reasoning for any conclusion.

Nope. None of the above instead what we have are boasters who play
a game of cat and mouse. Next the little people chime in with real world
questions based on real principles who are shooting in the dark and always
shot down.

Why don't we all just say that none of us knows what's really going on
OR show an example to prove that you do understand. Cause I sure
don't and can't follow all of these long lines of gibberish without some
honest to goodness experiments in the said direction.

Turion and Mario both have picked good questions that were cast off
without a care, questions I would have asked if I were smart enough on
the subject, questions that looked like to me should get us all involved
with a hands on experiment.

Nope again. No way, just more speculation.

Will someone with a need to get to the bottom of this explain what this
is all about? Is there and experimental principle that anyone can show
here that gets us all to another new plane of understanding?

I mean isn't that what we are here for?

Nope, just rambling without a clue and this is making me wonder if
I am going mad.
__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 09-05-2016 at 04:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #886  
Old 09-05-2016, 05:46 AM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
no ranting

Excuse me ! i don't see not one once of ranting in my post.(simple english) if you can't understand the Figuera device try the advise i gave Mario, read and study the patents. that's as plain and simple as i can put it guy. wow, to blast someone for their knowledge on a particular subject is just completely wrong.
i even stated if there was a question just ask. now what do you want to know? just ask instead of blowing off at the mouth.
no one was "blown off" as quoted from you. i responded with an intelligent answer that apparently you didn't approve of and if that is the case, i cant help you their.

if you don't understand just ask!

Ps. simple experiment, as stated in my long description post, take two opposing magnets glued to a nonmagnetic strip. with a loop of coil in between. move magnets back and forth and you will see galvanometer move with double the intensity as one magnet alone.
this is the same action of the Figuera device. read about William Hooper and it might clear things up a bit, also read my excellent description post 873.

sorry you have been mislead until now.
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-05-2016 at 06:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #887  
Old 09-05-2016, 06:58 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,132
Okay Okay I'll try it. This is where I am suppose to bow out gracefully
by saying (Like the last 10,000 people have) thanks I'll go back and
re-read the patents again and since my patent reading abilities are
garbage I'll see you in about 20yrs.

No you didn't do anything wrong but I am frustrated with all these
threads that don't give any tangible connection to free energy production
or shall I say I don't see anything here yet. There I go again asking
for any kind of direction to the result.

Yes I would like to know what it is, not what it is not. So far the others
have found out what it is not. They ask to gain a point of
reference and WOW they are just left hangin. No one ever
said you were ranting, it's me doing that come on.

Many devote religious men come and go leaving us with the same
ole classic line "GO READ THE PATENTS" Ya know science being
the cornerstone of worship.

I guess I have that line down to a tee.

Come on "M" Man you can help me further into this than that can't you?
Since you are offering a deeper understanding, surely you have an
experimental validation?

Okay I got the part about the coil of wire and the magnets, now what
are you doing with it? Or what can be done with it? Or what could I do
with this to show some sort of result that will benefit others in that the
principle shows the viewer that something never before seen is taking
place?

CAN YOU TAKE ME HIGHER THAN THE COIL BETWEEN TWO MAGNETS?

Because frankly I don't see what you see or do you see something I don't see? See how I am drowning here and those who have come and gone
have already drowned for lack of any sort of communication with
continuity?

Not because of you, because this is a highly complex entry. I am hoping
you are the man to spearhead this darken path for some of us.

__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 09-05-2016 at 07:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #888  
Old 09-05-2016, 08:53 AM
marathonman marathonman is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 543
Thumbs up Slow down n' breath

Wow ! you need a vacation or less medication.

what the two opposing magnets are doing through movement are creating two motional electric fields that just so happen to support each other creating a double intensity E field. both induced are in the same direction and this is exactly what is happening in the Figuera device.

that is two Motional Electric fields with both induced in the same direction. this can NEVER happen with N/S set up, it has to be N/N for this to work causing the B fields to be effectively canceled but the remaining E field remains intact. the secondary according to the patent is "properly placed" in this zero B field zone.
slow down and let this wonderful information sink in and read post 873.
__________________
 

Last edited by marathonman; 09-05-2016 at 09:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #889  
Old 09-05-2016, 09:51 AM
Mario's Avatar
Mario Mario is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by marathonman View Post
No sir, that would be incorrect.
the two primary sets are taken up and down in opposition in unison causing the formation of a double strength E field. notice i said "UNISON" because without the exact timing of both primaries one taken up, while the other down, induction will fall to the peak of the increasing electromagnet. currant is only reduced enough to clear the secondary then raised again while the other is reduced.....never off !
see both primary magnetic fields are occupying the same relative space in space, causing the two motional electric fields to form in the same direction complimenting each other so when the unison motion is broken, induction will fall to the peak of one electromagnet. this very fact has eluded many replicators to the point of putting the research down when in their frustration they failed to realize this very fact.

also, there is no collapsing field to be collected in the Figuera device "EVER". if bemf is present, induction will fall to the peak of one. as the increasing electromagnet basically shoves the decreasing electromagnet out of the secondary, the energy in that confined space of the core will be shoved out the back of the primary feeding part G's core being stored like an inductor, to be used in the next half rotation of the brush. this very action allows the Figuera device to be self sustaining.
part G's opposing fields allows this action to take place blocking the field energy from draining out, thus allowing the declining electromagnet to feed it every half turn of the brush.

i would suggest you study all figuera patents before you attempt replication or further postings to grasp the concept of Figuera's dream device.
go to Hanon's web site and download all the patents and study till your eyes bulge out.

if you have any questions please feel free to contact me and i will explain the best i can. i have 10's of thousands of hrs study and research in the Figuera device, basically devoted my life to it.

MM
Hi MM,

I think I'm seeing it correctly, but maybe I didn't use the right words. I'm someone who needs to visualise the basic concept in his minds eye, see the involved processes at work…
What you describe with the 2 opposing magnets glued to a non magnetic stick moved back and forth is actually the basic process I meant. With field collapse I mean the flyback, not counter emf or back emf. So if I turn the mosfet of one coil ON the current/mag.field increases to its maximum point. When I turn it OFF the current/mag.field decreases (but still in the same direction) at a rate dictated by what the coil is connected to. In the case I mentioned it would be connected to the source battery. This results in the even up and down ramps in current/mag. fields of the to coils as show in the attached drawing (very crude..)
Now, I know that in the original the varying currents and storage of returning energy was done with the special part G rheostat or variac. But, since we know the basic actions we want to take place, I thought what I described earlier could still do what we want.

Mario
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2312.jpg (206.4 KB, 47 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #890  
Old 09-05-2016, 01:04 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 5,009
Right On the "Money" MarathonMan!

Quote:
Originally Posted by marathonman View Post
Marathonman

[...THE BEST POST OF ALL...]




Hello MarathonMan,

It is very nice and comforting to see that at least One single person on this whole Forum is "seeing" EXACTLY what I have been repeating over and over all over this place.

You are RIGHT ON driving EXACTLY into the real thing. The real "secret" that has been hiding for so long...

All this time we could have JUST moved THE MAGNETIC FIELD (What I call the "Virtual", Massless, Weightless Magnetic Field and of course including the Electric Field, knowing that always Both Fields come Along...).

You have got the perfect and MAIN "law" for this to take place...do not EVER, allow for those Fields to Collapse.

About "Part G"...I built it:

[IMG][/IMG]

Out of an Old Car Alternator slip rings...a Commutator and some brushes I designed to be able to spin at high speeds without separating from contact.

The only difference between Figuera's Patent and what I am doing...is just about the way I am exciting coils...Figuera does it in a Linear-Reciprocating (Straight Back and Forth) action, while I am doing it in a Rotary Fashion...but the principle is Exactly the same.

The bottom of all this...is that IF We follow all the Fields "likes", we will get a perfect induction at the "Secondaries", which could be also called "The Induced Coils" or the "Generating Coils", etc,etc.

I also call this Effect to "Mutate" the Fields along the cores, without allowing them to ever collapse.

The other VERY Important fact...is that We also could do this same effect by using Only N-N or S-S facing towards the "Secondary" or "Induced"...And the advantages I see by doing this are:

1-Coils Voltage Polarity never reverses, so only One Brush could be used while connecting a "common" kind of ground to all coils in the "Primary", or DC Exciting Field...

2-This set up lead Us to use less complex Electronics circuitry for FET's to drive this translation of the Fields in Solid State, by using either a High or Low side signal, but only ONE SIGNAL, while we keep the other line directly connected to one end of the coils.

The Coils geometrical arrangement between Primaries and Secondaries could be done in any "color" we all choose...straight, linear like Figuera...or closed rotary into any shape like an Ellipse, a Toroid (like Steven Marks TPU), or simply even a square or rhomboid geometry will work as well...just because it don't matter...as long as the Induced is "sandwiched" between both Inducing or Exciting Fields as it follows a sequential, -non stop- continuous pattern.


This is the key to Free Energy guys...we spin that Virtual Field through any arrangement of ferromagnetic core elements without ever allowing it to collapse...and vualá...here comes free energy.


Doesn't it feels bad thinking that Mankind could have done exactly this same thing over two hundred years ago...without ever needing to rotate those super heavy, tons of heavy steel rotors to generate electrical energy?

Plus...If we consider that All Generators ever built out there...are not sweeping Double-Crossed Inducing Fields between "Secondaries" or "Generating Fields"...but just One Field at a time...that is a waste of -at least- Half of the Energy EVER Produced...

Oh well...it did fill up the pockets of all Oil Cartels for that long...

The "Hidden, Secret Game" is over...

I am wishing you the best of luck and success in all your future builds, as am very sure you will do get there!!


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 09-05-2016 at 01:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #891  
Old 09-05-2016, 01:14 PM
Wistiti Wistiti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 483

Nice post UFO!
I think you really understand it!
With your great build skill i will not be surprise if you be one of the first to show us a working prototype.

__________________
 

Last edited by Wistiti; 09-05-2016 at 01:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #892  
Old 09-05-2016, 04:41 PM
hanon1492 hanon1492 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 463
MM,

Thanks for reviving this thread. It is always good to get skilled people involved in this project. I hope trolls do not come to f*** up this good conversation.

Everyo e: Please study in deepth the 1908 patent https://figueragenerator.files.wordp...uera-44267.pdf

And please note the patent notation trick to hide the repulsion between both inducers fileds.

Rectangle N and Rectangle S could had been called as Rectangle A and Rectangle B.

This is the real secret.

__________________
 

Last edited by hanon1492; 09-05-2016 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #893  
Old 09-05-2016, 05:50 PM
Jeff Pearson Jeff Pearson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Taos NM
Posts: 188
Bro Mikey...experimental verification....mechanical analogy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crq9j-f6Z7g
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #894  
Old 09-05-2016, 06:05 PM
kEhYo77's Avatar
kEhYo77 kEhYo77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 171
Hanon, are you 101% sure that this is the case with N and S poles being wrong? I know the patent says that it is a simplified drawing.
To me the whole drawing looks more and more like rectangular coils from top view. The wires touch to those rectangular lines and in the center of each coil there is an indication of what magnetic field of that coil is facing the top, the bottom is hidden and is opposite. Also, it look to me that the resistor array part might have been a cylindrical, cored inductor consisting many turns between taps and working as a variable choke. I'll try to check something similar on my setup.
I am not trying to sway you or anything, I'm just seeing what I see.
__________________
“ THE PERSON WHO SAYS IT CANNOT BE DONE SHOULD NOT INTERRUPT THE PERSON DOING IT ! ”

Last edited by kEhYo77; 09-05-2016 at 06:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #895  
Old 09-05-2016, 07:17 PM
interdesign21 interdesign21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Malaga-Spain
Posts: 104
@hanon
The one Figuera concept which has obsessed me for a looong time, is that variable DC current WITHOUT COLLAPSE.

In my mind it drove its own path and staked altogether with the Ken W. concept about opposing poles. (high pressure space)

Suddenly both gave sense, and I made a setup to observe its rightness.
I am actually winding some coils over a ferrite ring to improve it.
I can see in cacharreo that Figuera is indeed well alive.
regards
Alvaro
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #896  
Old 09-05-2016, 07:29 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 5,009
Looking at Magnetic Fields...

Hello to All,

This is the way I see the magnetic fields on this patent...

[IMG][/IMG]

Above is the same exact image from original patent...except for the color lines and numbers are mine.

I have set the contact brush at three basic positions (1, 4, 8), and based on the resistor diagram plus the connections of the DC Field feeding All Coils, Figuera is feeding at all times (no variation) the negative side, while He passes the Positive (High Side) through the contacts and resistors. (note the "+" sign at center of rotary disc.

So, in Position 1 the North Magnetic Field (Blue Lines) is at its Max Value, while South is at Minimum Values, since South Coils are receiving the Sum from All Resistors in series at its Positive Input. (note the South (Red Line) all the way back at position 1, while the Blue Line (North) is all the way to the front, closer to induced, secondary coils.

Position 2 is a "Half Way" where all coils are receiving same feeding, same resistance at positive input. So, Magnetic Fields are Identical in strength...or somewhere about, since Figuera has 13 resistors, so position 4 is NOT exactly Half Way...maybe an error...Idk...and IMHO I do not think this is relevant at all.

Position 3 is the complete opposite to position 1 where the South (red line) is all the way to the front (Max South), closer to Induced secondaries, while North (Blue Line) is all the way back as the weakest field, since it is adding all resistors in series to its Positive feed.

When we effect this variation through time, Both Magnetic Fields Polarizations fluctuate between High Mid and Low strengths in a smooth fashion thanks to resistors, as resistors also do not allow for both magnetic fields to ever collapse, even in the "in-between" contacts.

It should be understood that at the other side of the resistor box, are another six contacts which complete the full 360º rotation from 9 to 14 at commutator.

Maybe you all know this by now (I know for sure MarathonMan does)...if so, just disregard this post and am sorry.


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 09-05-2016 at 07:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #897  
Old 09-05-2016, 07:56 PM
Wistiti Wistiti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 483
:(

Sorry UFO i have tough you have understand...
But you drawing is wrong... The primary is always in bucking!!!
N-N or S-S but not N-S...
It is always bucking but varing the intensity of one of the bucking coil at the time.

...
MM please correct me if im wrong!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #898  
Old 09-05-2016, 08:18 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 5,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wistiti View Post
Sorry UFO i have tough you have understand...
But you drawing is wrong... The primary is always in bucking!!!
N-N or S-S but not N-S...
It is always bucking but varing the intensity of one of the bucking coil at the time.

...
MM please correct me if im wrong!
Hey Wistiti,

Oh am sorry, but I went by the N-S Letters...and took them as poles...

But do not worry, it works as well for N-N or S-S...it really don't matter, that could be changed by simply rotating the coils 180º and test which way give you more energy.

The point here is what happens to the magnetic fields, how they fluctuate back and forth with the secondary in the middle...no matter if all north, or all south or in attraction mode, N-S or S-N.

Do not complicate yourself with minor details...try to focus on the invisible fields and not allowing them to ever collapse...


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote
  #899  
Old 09-05-2016, 08:29 PM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Pearson View Post
Bro Mikey...experimental verification....mechanical analogy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crq9j-f6Z7g
Thanks Jeff
I like the experiment, the endless talk is fine too. I still have the iron
filings I used in grade school. After studying the patent I'll come back in
a few years to see what device came of this.

I want to see hanon device. I'll keep watching for that.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #900  
Old 09-05-2016, 08:29 PM
Wistiti Wistiti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 483
I think the polarity of the primary field really mathers... It must always be in
Bucking ... Test it, i think it is the best way to see it! 😉
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
clemente, figuera, re-inventing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers